Fulminant myocarditis in a COVID-19 positive patient treated with mechanical circulatory support - a case report

Case series: successful salvage from refractory cardiogenic shock caused by COVID-19-associated myocardial injury with temporary ventricular assist devices

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is predominantly known to cause respiratory injury; however, the present case series highlights four instances in which the infection resulted in significant cardiac complications. Among such cases, some represent severe cardiogenic shock, which necessitates the immediate introduction of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for salvage.

Case summary

This case series involved patients with COVID-19-associated myocardial injury leading to fulminant cardiogenic shock. These patients required immediate implementation of peripheral MCS, followed by an instant upgrade to a central MCS system due to anatomical limitations and severe biventricular dysfunction. Central MCS provided effective ventricular unloading, resulting in a significant and prompt improvement in ventricular function. The treatment timeline showed rapid deterioration followed by remarkable recovery within 2 weeks of MCS initiation, demonstrating the effectiveness of aggressive and tailored MCS strategies in managing severe COVID-19-related cardiac complications.

Discussion

This study provides significant insights into the cardiovascular implications of COVID-19, particularly in the context of severe myocardial injury that leads to cardiogenic shock. The report underscores the importance of early recognition and intervention in such cases, focusing on the use of MCS as a life-saving modality. The findings also revealed unique pathological features of COVID-19-associated myocardial injury, including macrophage-predominant infiltration and microthrombosis, which are distinct from the features of conventional myocarditis. These findings highlight the need for further research on the pathophysiology of COVID-19-related cardiac injuries and the development of targeted therapeutic strategies.

Fulminant Myocarditis with SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Narrative Review from the Case Studies

One of the severe complications of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is myocarditis. However, the characteristics of fulminant myocarditis with SARS-CoV-2 infection are still unclear. We systematically reviewed the previously reported cases of fulminant myocarditis associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection from January 2020 to December 2022, identifying 108 cases. Of those, 67 were male and 41 female. The average age was 34.8 years; 30 patients (27.8%) were ≤20 years old, whereas 10 (9.3%) were ≥60. Major comorbidities included hypertension, obesity, diabetes mellitus, asthma, heart disease, gynecologic disease, hyperlipidemia, and connective tissue disorders. Regarding left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at admission, 93% of the patients with fulminant myocarditis were classified as having heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 40%). Most of the cases were administered catecholamines (97.8%), and mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was required in 67 cases (62.0%). The type of MCS was extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 56, 83.6%), percutaneous ventricular assist device (Impella®) (n = 19, 28.4%), intra-aortic balloon pumping (n = 12, 12.9%), or right ventricular assist device (n = 2, 3.0%); combination of these devices occurred in 20 cases (29.9%). The average duration of MCS was 7.7 ± 3.8 days. Of the 76 surviving patients whose cardiac function was available for follow-up, 65 (85.5%) recovered normally. The overall mortality rate was 22.4%, and the recovery rate was 77.6% (alive: 83 patients, dead: 24 patients; outcome not described: 1 patient).

Clinical indications and outcomes of Impella devices for severe cardiogenic shock in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can present with significant cardiac dysfunction, including cardiogenic shock. Mechanical circulatory support with an Impella device may be utilized in these patients to support and offload native right ventricle (RV) and left ventricle (LV) functions. This systematic review aims to describe clinical indications, management, laboratory data, and outcomes in patients with severe cardiogenic shock from COVID-19 treated with an Impella device.

Methods

A PRISMA-directed systematic review was performed and prospectively registered in PROSPERO. The databases accessed included PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and ScienceDirect. Quality and risk of bias assessments were completed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for case reports.

Results

A total of 16 records were included in the qualitative synthesis; 8/16 (50%) of the patients were men. The average age was 39 years (SD: 14.7). The biventricular Impella (BiPella) approach was recorded in 3/16 (18.75%) patients. A total of 4/16 (25%) individuals required renal replacement therapy (RRT). Single-device usage was observed in three cases: 2/16 Impella CP (12.5%) and 1/16 Impella RP (6.25%). Treatment of COVID-19 myocarditis included a wide range of antivirals and immunomodulators; 8/16 (50%) cases needed ECMO (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) support. Overall, only 2/16 (11.7%) individuals died.

Conclusions

Sixteen reported individuals have received an Impella implanted with a mortality rate of 11.7%. Concurrent use of RRT and ECMO implantation was often observed. Overall, the Impella device is an effective and safe strategy in the management of COVID-19-related cardiogenic shock. Future studies should include long-term results.

COVID-19 and Acute Cardiac Injury: Clinical Manifestations, Biomarkers, Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to comprehensively explore the clinical characteristics of COVID-19-related cardiac injury and examine the potential mechanisms underlying cardiac injury in patients affected by COVID-19.

RECENT FINDINGS

The COVID-19 pandemic has primarily been associated with severe respiratory symptoms. However, emerging evidence has indicated that a significant number of COVID-19 patients also experience myocardial injury, leading to conditions such as acute myocarditis, heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, and arrhythmias. The incidence of myocardial injury is notably higher in patients with preexisting cardiovascular diseases. Myocardial injury often manifests with elevated levels of inflammation biomarkers, as well as abnormalities observed on electrocardiograms and echocardiograms. COVID-19 infection has been found to be associated with myocardial injury, which can be attributed to several pathophysiological mechanisms. These mechanisms include injury caused by hypoxia, resulting from respiratory compromise, a systemic inflammatory response triggered by the infection, and direct attack on the myocardium by the virus itself. Furthermore, the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor plays a crucial role in this process. Early recognition, prompt diagnosis, and a comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms are essential for effectively managing and reducing the mortality associated with myocardial injury in COVID-19 patients.

Cardiogenic shock due to probable SARS-CoV-2 myocarditis-a case report

Background

Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, many case reports have been presented describing different cardiac symptoms due to the SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, severe cardiac failure due to COVID-19 seems to be rare.

Case summary

A 30-year-old woman presented with COVID-19 and cardiogenic shock due to a lymphocytic myocarditis. Since she deteriorated under treatment with inotropes, she was referred to our centre, and veno-arterial extracorporeal life support was started. Subsequently, the aortic valve only opened sporadically, and spontaneous contrast appeared in the left ventricle (LV), pointing towards difficulties with unloading LV. Therefore, an Impella for venting the LV was implanted. After 6 days of mechanical circulatory support, her heart function recovered. All support could be weaned, and 2 months later, she had made a full recovery.

Discussion

We presented a patient with severe cardiogenic shock due to an acute virus-negative lymphocytic myocarditis associated with a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Since the precise aetiology of SARS-CoV-2-related myocarditis remains to be elucidated and no virus could be detected in the heart, a causal relationship remains speculative.

Severe COVID-19-associated myocarditis with cardiogenic shock - management with assist devices - a case report & review

BACKGROUND

Primary viral myocarditis associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov2) infection is a rare diagnosis.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report the case of an unvaccinated, healthy patient with cardiogenic shock in the context of a COVID-19-associated myocarditis and therapy with simultaneous veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and percutaneous left ventricular decompression therapy with an Impella. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of therapeutic options for patients with COVID-19-associated myocarditis.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients required a combination of two assist devices to achieve sufficient cardiac output until recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction. Due to the rapid onset of this fulminant cardiogenic shock immediate invasive bridging therapy in a specialized center was lifesaving.

First report of myocarditis in two patients with COVID-19 Omicron variant: case report

Background

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection is responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemics. Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant is the cause for the surge of the COVID-19 pandemics of the end of 2021 and the beginning of 2022, although its subvariants are responsible for the following daily increase of COVID-19 cases in July 2022. Early reports of Omicron variant confirmed patients indicated less severe disease course compared with the disease caused by previously encountered variants with absence of data regarding cardiac involvement by Omicron.

Case summary

A 42-year-old male who tested positive for Omicron was admitted on January 2022 with chest pain and ST-segment elevation in the inferior leads. Coronary angiography revealed non-significant coronary artery disease. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated features consistent with myocarditis with involvement of 22% of the left ventricular mass by late gadolinium enhancement involving both the lateral and the septal walls. The second patient is a 60-year-old male presented following syncope and palpitations after he was confirmed with Omicron infection. Upon emergency department arrival he had ventricular tachycardia of 250 beats/minute and underwent urgent cardioversion. During his hospitalization, there was no recurrence of malignant arrhythmia, coronary angiography revealed non-obstructive disease. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated imaging features suggesting acute myocarditis with involvement of 19% of the left ventricular mass.

Discussion

This is the first report of myocarditis cases as a possible complication associated with Omicron variant. Despite preliminary reports of less severe disease clinicians should be vigilant for potential deleterious cardiac complications of Omicron.

Heart failure during the COVID-19 pandemic: clinical, diagnostic, management, and organizational dilemmas

The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) infection pandemic has affected the care of patients with heart failure (HF). Several consensus documents describe the appropriate diagnostic algorithm and treatment approach for patients with HF and associated COVID-19 infection. However, few questions about the mechanisms by which COVID can exacerbate HF in patients with high-risk (Stage B) or symptomatic HF (Stage C) remain unanswered. Therefore, the type of HF occurring during infection is poorly investigated. The diagnostic differentiation and management should be focused on the identification of the HF phenotype, underlying causes, and subsequent tailored therapy. In this framework, the relationship existing between COVID and onset of acute decompensated HF, isolated right HF, and cardiogenic shock is questioned, and the specific management is mainly based on local hospital organization rather than a standardized model. Similarly, some specific populations such as advanced HF, heart transplant, patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD), or valve disease remain under investigated. In this systematic review, we examine recent advances regarding the relationships between HF and COVID-19 pandemic with respect to epidemiology, pathogenetic mechanisms, and differential diagnosis. Also, according to the recent HF guidelines definition, we highlight different clinical profile identification, pointing out the main concerns in understudied HF populations.

Full myocardial recovery following COVID-19 fulminant myocarditis after biventricular mechanical support with BiPella: a case report

Background

Fulminant myocarditis is a rare yet dreadful condition, which requires evaluation for mechanical support. The concomitant use of an Impella pump in the left and of one in the right ventricle—the so-called ‘BiPella approach’—might allow recovery of the failing heart in selected cases. We report a peculiar case, in which mechanical circulatory support was used as the sole strategy to promote myocardial recovery, without the administration of any immunosuppressants in coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 fulminant myocarditis.

Case summary

A previously healthy 49-year-black man presented to the emergency department with dyspnoea and severe metabolic acidosis. His nasopharyngeal swab resulted positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Echocardiography documented severe biventricular dysfunction which required support with two Impella pumps—the so-called ‘BiPella approach’. Myocarditis was suspected on clinical basis. Endomyocardial biopsy showed SARS-CoV-2 localization within the endothelial cells. No antiviral or immunosuppressive therapy was administered. After 10 days of support, the patient was weaned from both right- and left-ventricular supports as complete recovery of cardiac function and end-organ damage was observed. The patient was discharged from the intensive care unit after 15 days and discharged home 1 month after presentation. The patient had no further episodes of heart failure at 6 months follow up.

Discussion

Prolonged mechanical unloading with two Impella pumps in fulminant COVID-19 myocarditis is a viable and reliable strategy, as it provides the benefits of mechanical circulatory support plus additional disease-modifying effects, reducing wall stress and inflammatory response.

A case of COVID-19-associated fulminant myocarditis successfully treated with mechanical circulatory support

A 49-year-old man, who had not been vaccinated against COVID-19 visited the hospital for fever and cough, and a PCR test for COVID-19 was positive on the Day X. Initially, there was no decrease in oxygen saturation and the patient was under observation as a mild case without medication. Five days after the onset (Day X + 5), chest pain appeared. Electrocardiogram showed widespread ST-segment elevation, and blood tests showed high levels of troponin I. However, given that there was no stenotic lesion on coronary computed tomography, myocarditis was suspected, and he was transferred to our hospital on the Day X + 6. We started treatment with lemdesivir and dexamethasone. On the Day X + 7, the patient developed decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, hypotension, and hyperlactatemia. We decided that mechanical circulatory support was necessary and an Impella 5.0 was inserted under ventilator management. The patient was successfully weaned from the Impella 5.0 on the Day X + 17, was transferred to the general ward on the Day X + 24, continued rehabilitation, and was discharged home on the Day X + 39 with no heart failure symptoms. In this case, we performed daily bedside echocardiography and chose the Impella 5.0 instead of extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) because there were no findings of severe pneumonia or right heart failure. The Impella 5.0 device was inserted via an axillary artery approach, given that it provides more assisted flow than the Impella CP inserted through the inguinal route. Furthermore, early rehabilitation was possible due to the lack of restriction of the lower body.

Temporary mechanical circulatory support for COVID-19 patients: A systematic review of literature

OBJECTIVE

Myocardial damage occurs in up to 25% of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. While veno-venous extracorporeal life support (V-V ECLS) is used as respiratory support, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) may be required for severe cardiac dysfunction. This systematic review summarizes the available literature regarding MCS use rates, disease drivers for MCS initiation, and MCS outcomes in COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

PubMed/EMBASE were searched until October 14, 2021. Articles including adults receiving ECLS for COVID-19 were included. The primary outcome was the rate of MCS use. Secondary outcomes included mortality at follow-up, ECLS conversion rate, intubation-to-cannulation time, time on ECLS, cardiac diseases, use of inotropes, and vasopressors.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight observational studies (comprising both ECLS-only populations and ECLS patients as part of larger populations) included 4218 COVID-19 patients (females: 28.8%; median age: 54.3 years, 95%CI: 50.7-57.8) of whom 2774 (65.8%) required ECLS with the majority (92.7%) on V-V ECLS, 4.7% on veno-arterial ECLS and/or Impella, and 2.6% on other ECLS. Acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest were reported in 7.8%, 9.7%, and 6.6% of patients, respectively. Vasopressors were used in 37.2%. Overall, 3.1% of patients required an ECLS change from V-V ECLS to MCS for heart failure, myocarditis, or myocardial infarction. The median ECLS duration was 15.9 days (95%CI: 13.9-16.3), with an overall survival of 54.6% and 28.1% in V-V ECLS and MCS patients. One study reported 61.1% survival with oxy-right ventricular assist device.

CONCLUSION

MCS use for cardiocirculatory compromise has been reported in 7.3% of COVID-19 patients requiring ECLS, which is a lower percentage compared to the incidence of any severe cardiocirculatory complication. Based on the poor survival rates, further investigations are warranted to establish the most appropriated indications and timing for MCS in COVID-19.

A case of fulminant myocarditis due to COVID-19 in an adolescent patient successfully treated with venous arterial ECMO as a bridge to recovery

Emerging data suggest an association between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and the development of acute myocarditis, with children and older adults being most at risk. We describe the clinical course of a previously healthy 12-year-old female who rapidly deteriorated into cardiogenic shock and arrest due to coronavirus disease 2019 induced fulminant myocarditis, necessitating venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to full recovery. This case highlights the importance of early clinical recognition of myocardial involvement, and the benefits of taking a multidisciplinary approach in treating these patients.

The Pathogenesis and Long-Term Consequences of COVID-19 Cardiac Injury

•

COVID-19 myocardial injury results from immune and hypercoagulability responses.

•

Long-term cardiac consequences of COVID-19 include structural and functional changes.

•

Myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination is uncommon (highest risk in teenage males).

•

Larger population-based studies are necessary to validate these early results.

The mechanisms of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)–related myocardial injury comprise both direct viral invasion and indirect (hypercoagulability and immune-mediated) cellular injuries. Some patients with COVID-19 cardiac involvement have poor clinical outcomes, with preliminary data suggesting long-term structural and functional changes. These include persistent myocardial fibrosis, edema, and intraventricular thrombi with embolic events, while functionally, the left ventricle is enlarged, with a reduced ejection fraction and new-onset arrhythmias reported in a number of patients. Myocarditis post-COVID-19 vaccination is rare but more common among young male patients. Larger studies, including prospective data from biobanks, will be useful in expanding these early findings and determining their validity.

Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients with Fulminant Myocarditis: A Review of Contemporary Literature

Fulminant myocarditis is characterized by life threatening heart failure presenting as cardiogenic shock requiring inotropic or mechanical circulatory support to maintain tissue perfusion. There are limited data on the role of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in the management of fulminant myocarditis. This review seeks to evaluate the management of fulminant myocarditis with a special emphasis on the role and outcomes with VA-ECMO use.

A Case of Isolated SARS-CoV-2 Fulminant Myopericarditis Without Respiratory Failure

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Several cardiovascular complications of COVID-19 have been described in clinical studies. While those with pre-existing cardiovascular disease seem to have worse outcomes, growing evidence suggests that COVID-19 itself can cause myocardial injury, arrhythmia, and heart failure. We report a case of a 27-year-old male with no known comorbidities who presented with nausea, vomiting and non-radiating substernal chest pressure without respiratory symptoms in May of 2020. Laboratory findings showed elevated cardiac biomarkers and electrocardiogram showed diffuse ST-segment elevation. Coronary angiography revealed normal coronaries but findings suggestive of cardiogenic shock. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2 returned positive. He was treated for fulminant myopericarditis and cardiogenic shock with remdesivir, steroid, inotropes and vasopressors but rapidly deteriorated and went into cardiac arrest and was unable to be resuscitated despite multiple rounds of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Fulminant myopericarditis is a rare complication of COVID-19 with high mortality that requires early recognition, treatment and a transfer to a tertiary facility with advanced cardiac services.