Intensive blood pressure lowering in different age categories: insights from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial

Relevance of age and hypertension for blood pressure targets in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: a BOX-trial sub-study

AIMS

To assess whether the optimal mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) target after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is influenced by age and a history of arterial hypertension.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A post hoc analysis of data from the Blood Pressure and Oxygenation Targets in Post Resuscitation Care trial. The trial included 789 comatose patients randomized to a MAP target of 63 or 77 mmHg. The primary outcome of this sub-study was 1-year all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards regression and restricted cubic splines were used to examine whether prevalent hypertension and age modified the effect of low vs. high MAP target on all-cause mortality. Of the 789 patients randomized, 393 were assigned to a high MAP target, and 396 to a low MAP target. Groups were well-balanced for mean age (high MAP target 63 ± 13 years vs. low 62 ± 14 years) and hypertension (45 vs. 47%, respectively). At 1 year, the primary outcome occurred in 143 patients (36%) with a high MAP target and 138 (35%) with a low MAP target. The risk of the primary outcome increased linearly with increasing age (P < 0.001). The effect of a high vs. low MAP target on the primary outcome was modified by age when tested continuously, potentially favouring a low MAP target in younger patients (P for interaction = 0.03). Prevalent hypertension did not modify the effect of a high vs. low MAP target on the primary outcome (P for interaction = 0.67).

CONCLUSION

Among patients resuscitated after OHCA, older patients and those with a history of hypertension did not benefit from a high MAP target.

The association of intensive blood pressure treatment and non-fatal cardiovascular or serious adverse events in older adults with mortality: mediation analysis in SPRINT

AIMS

Randomized clinical trials of hypertension treatment intensity evaluate the effects on incident major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Occurrences after a non-fatal index event have not been rigorously evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of intensive (<120 mmHg) to standard (<140 mmHg) blood pressure (BP) treatment with mortality mediated through a non-fatal MACE or non-fatal SAE in 9361 participants in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Logistic regression and causal mediation modelling to obtain direct and mediated effects of intensive BP treatment. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality (ACM). Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular (CVM) and non-CV mortality (non-CVM). The direct effect of intensive treatment was a lowering of ACM [odds ratio (OR) 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60-0.94]. The MACE-mediated effect substantially attenuated (OR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92-0.99) ACM, while the SAE-mediated effect was associated with increased (OR 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05) ACM. Similar patterns were noted for intensive BP treatment on CVM and non-CVM. We also noted that SAE incidence was 3.9-fold higher than MACE incidence (13.7 vs. 3.5%), and there were a total of 365 (3.9%) ACM cases, with non-CVM being 2.6-fold higher than CVM [2.81% (263/9361) vs. 1.09% (102/9361)]. The SAE to MACE and non-CVM to CVM preponderance was found across all age groups, with the ≥80-year age group having the highest differences.

CONCLUSION

The current analytic techniques demonstrated that intensive BP treatment was associated with an attenuated mortality benefit when it was MACE-mediated and possibly harmful when it was SAE-mediated. Current cardiovascular trial reporting of treatment effects does not allow expansion of the lens to focus on important occurrences after the index event.

Consensus Statements from the Diabetologists & Endocrinologists Alliance for the Management of People with Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are important, intertwined public health issues. People with both conditions face significantly elevated risks of cardiovascular (CV) and renal complications. To optimize patient care, a multidisciplinary expert panel met to review recent evidence on optimal blood pressure (BP) targets, implications of albuminuria, and treatment regimens for hypertensive patients with T2DM, with the aim of providing recommendations for physicians in Hong Kong. The panel reviewed the relevant literature, obtained by searching PubMed for the publication period from January 2015 to June 2021, to address five discussion areas: (i) BP targets based on CV/renal benefits; (ii) management of isolated systolic or diastolic hypertension; (iii) roles of angiotensin II receptor blockers; (iv) implications of albuminuria for CV/renal events and treatment choices; and (v) roles and tools of screening for microalbuminuria. The panel held three virtual meetings using a modified Delphi method to address the discussion areas. After each meeting, consensus statements were derived and anonymously voted on by every panelist. A total of 17 consensus statements were formulated based on recent evidence and expert insights regarding cardioprotection and renoprotection for hypertensive patients with T2DM.

Very low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD): an antihypertensive nutritional approach

BACKGROUND

Obesity is accompanied by hormonal, inflammatory and endothelial alterations. These alterations induce a stimulation of several other mechanisms that contribute to the hypertensive state and to increase the cardiovascular morbidity. This pilot, open - label, single- center, prospective clinical trial aimed to evaluate the effect of very low- calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) on blood pressure (BP) in women with of obesity and hypertension.

METHODS

A total of 137 women, who met the inclusion criteria and accepted to adhere to VLCKD, were consecutively enrolled. Assessment of anthropometric parameters (weight, height, and waist circumference), body composition (through bioelectrical impedance analysis), systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and blood sample collection were carried out at baseline and after 45 days of the active phase of VLCKD.

RESULTS

After VLCKD all the women experienced a significant reduction in body weight and an overall improvement of body composition parameters. In addition, high sensitivity C reactive protein (hs- CRP) levels were significantly diminished (p < 0.001), while phase angle (PhA) increased by almost 9% (p < 0.001). Interestingly, both SBP and DBP were significantly improved (-12.89% and - 10.77%, respectively; p < 0.001). At baseline, SBP and DBP showed statistically significant correlations with body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, hs-CRP levels, PhA, total body water (TBW), extracellular water (ECW), Na / K ratio, and fat mass. Even after VLCKD, all correlations among SBP and DBP with the study variables were statistically significant, except for the association between DBP and Na / K ratio. Changes (%) in both SBP and DBP were associated with ∆BMI%, ∆PhA% and ∆hs- CRP levels (p < 0.001). In addition, only ∆SBP% was associated with ∆waist circumference (p = 0.017), ∆TBW (p = 0.017), and ∆fat mass (p < 0.001); while only ∆DBP% was associated with ∆ECW (p = 0.018), and ∆Na / K ratio (p = 0.048). After adjusting for ∆BMI, ∆WC, ∆PhA, ∆TBW, and ∆fat mass, the correlation between changes in ∆SBP and ∆hs -CRP levels remained statistically significant (p < 0.001). Similarly, the correlation between ∆DBP and ∆hs- CRP levels also remained statistically significant after adjustment for ∆BMI, ∆PhA, ∆Na / K ratio, and ∆ECW (p < 0.001). From multiple regression analysis ∆hs- CRP levels seemed to be the main predictor of changes of BP (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

VLCKD reduces BP in women with of obesity and hypertension in a safely manner.

Improving outcomes for older hypertensive patients: is more intensive treatment better?

INTRODUCTION

With population aging, late-life hypertension is becoming an increasingly important issue. Mounting evidence has documented additional cardiovascular benefits induced by a more intensive target, lower than what are recommended in most current guidelines for systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction in older patients with hypertension. However, the optimal target remains less clear.

AREAS COVERED

In the present review, we summarized the evolution of the perspective into late-life hypertension and the development of the 'optimal' target for SBP reduction in older patients with hypertension. More importantly, new evidence from latest antihypertensive drug-placebo studies, blood pressure target studies, and high-quality meta-analysis regarding the effect of intensive SBP treatment in older patients were covered and discussed in detail.

EXPERT OPINION

In summary, robust evidence supports that a SBP target of <130 mmHg is safe and will induce additional cardiovascular benefits in general older patients with hypertension. This benefit seems to be consistent, but less degreed in older patients with comorbidities such as chronic kidney disease or diabetes mellitus. However, such an intensive SBP target should be judiciously applied in older patients under extreme conditions. Collectively, edging down the relaxed SBP targets to <130 mmHg in most of the current guidelines is in imperative need.

Recent advances in managing primary hypertension

Hypertension remains a leading risk factor for cardiovascular mortality and morbidity globally despite the availability of effective and well-tolerated antihypertensive medications. Accumulating evidence suggests a more aggressive blood pressure regulation aimed at lower targets, particularly for selected patient groups. Our concepts of the optimal method for blood pressure measurement have radically changed, maintaining appropriate standard office measurements for initial assessment but relying on out-of-office measurement to better guide our decisions. Thorough risk stratification provides guidance in decision making; however, an individualized approach is highly recommended to prevent overtreatment. Undertreatment, on the other hand, remains a major concern and is mainly attributed to poor adherence and resistant or difficult-to-control forms of the disease. This review aims to present modern perspectives, novel treatment options, including innovative technological applications and developing interventional and pharmaceutical therapies, and the major concerns emerging from several years of research and epidemiological observations related to hypertension management.

Intensive blood pressure lowering: a practical review

According to the last Hypertension guideline recommendations, it may be concluded that intensive BP lowering is only advisable in a subgroup of patients where there is a clear net benefit of targeting to lower BP goals. However, taking into account the relevance of correct BP measurement, estimates of the benefits versus the harm should be based on reliable office BP measurements and home BP measurements.

There is still debate about which BP goals are optimal in reducing morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated hypertensives and in those with associated comorbidities. In recent years, trials and meta-analyses have assessed intensive BP lowering, with some success. However, a careful examination of the results shows that current data are not easily applicable to the general hypertensive population.

This article reviews the evidence on and controversies about intensive BP lowering in general and in specific clinical situations, and the importance of obtaining reliable BP readings in patients with hypertension and comorbidities.

Prevention of heart failure events with intensive versus standard blood pressure lowering across the spectrum of kidney function and albuminuria: a SPRINT substudy

AIMS

To determine whether a strategy of intensive blood pressure control reduces the risk of heart failure (HF) events consistently across the spectrum of kidney function and albuminuria.

METHODS AND RESULTS

SPRINT was a randomized clinical trial in which 9361 individuals ≥50 years, at high risk for or with cardiovascular disease, a systolic blood pressure of 130-180 mmHg, but without diabetes, were randomized to intensive (target <120 mmHg) vs. standard (target <140 mmHg) blood pressure control. We assessed whether estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) modified the effects of the blood pressure control strategy in reducing HF events (either hospitalization or emergency department visits) and the composite of HF events or cardiovascular death, using Cox proportional hazards regression and restricted cubic splines. Of the 9361 individuals included in SPRINT, eGFR and UACR were available for 9324 (99.6%) and 8913 (95.2%) subjects, respectively, including 2650 (28.4%) with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m² and 248 (2.8%) with UACR >300 mg/g. During a median follow-up of 3.2 years (range 0-4.8 years), 160 (1.8%) participants had HF events and 233 (2.6%) had HF events or cardiovascular death. Risks of HF events or cardiovascular death increased from 0.42 (0.34-0.53) per 100 patient-years in patients with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m² and UACR <30 mg/g to 4.55 (3.00-6.91) per 100 patient-years in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m² and UACR >300 mg/g. A similar gradient was observed for HF events alone. Both eGFR and UACR were independently, non-linearly associated with HF hospitalization and HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death (test for overall trend, P < 0.001). While the effects of intensive blood pressure control on HF event risk appeared to attenuate at lower eGFR and higher UACR, there was no significant interaction between eGFR or UACR and blood pressure control strategy (continuous and categorical interaction P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In SPRINT, eGFR and albuminuria were strong and additive determinants in forecasting HF risk. The effect of intensive blood pressure control in decreasing HF risk did not significantly vary across the spectrum of kidney function or albuminuria. Multidisciplinary pathways, incorporating blood pressure control, are needed for at-risk patients with chronic kidney disease to attenuate HF risk.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01206062.

Unsolved Problem: (Isolated) Systolic Hypertension with Diastolic Blood Pressure below the Safety Margin

The problem of high systolic blood pressure (sBP) combined with low diastolic blood pressure (dBP) requires attention because sBP is directly and continuously related to the most important criterion, i.e., all-cause mortality, whereas dBP becomes inversely related to it after the age of 50-60 years. The European Society of Cardiology and European Society of -Hypertension (ESC/ESH) 2018 guidelines for hypertension (HTN) are helpful because they recommend a lower safety cut-off for in-treatment dBP. To prevent tissue hypoperfusion, these guidelines recommend that dBP should be ≥70 mm Hg during treatment. A patient with very elevated sBP (e.g., 220 mm Hg) and low dBP (e.g., 65 mm Hg) is difficult to treat if one strictly follows the guidelines. In this situation, the sBP is a clear indication for antihypertensive treatment, but the dBP is a relative contraindication (as it is <70 mm Hg, a safety margin recognized by the 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines). The dilemma about whether or not to treat isolated systolic hypertension (SH) patients with low dBP (<70 mm Hg) is evident from the fact that almost half (45%) remain untreated. This is a common occurrence and identifying this problem is the first step to solving it. We suggest that an adequate search and analysis should be performed, starting from the exploration of the prognosis of the isolated (I)SH subset of patients with a very low dBP (<70 mm Hg) at the beginning of already performed randomized clinical trials.