Non-invasive left ventricular pressure-volume loops from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and brachial blood pressure: validation using pressure catheter measurements

Contractility, ventriculoarterial coupling, and stroke work after acute myocardial infarction using CMR-derived pressure-volume loop data

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive left ventricular (LV) pressure-volume (PV) loops derived by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) have recently been shown to enable characterization of cardiac hemodynamics. Thus, such PV loops could potentially provide additional diagnostic information such as contractility, arterial elastance (Ea ) and stroke work (SW) currently not available in clinical routine. This study sought to investigate to what extent PV-loop variables derived with a novel noninvasive method can provide incremental physiological information over cardiac dimensions and blood pressure in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS

A total of 100 patients with acute MI and 75 controls were included in the study. All patients underwent CMR 2-6 days after MI including assessment of myocardium at risk (MaR) and infarct size (IS). Noninvasive PV loops were generated from CMR derived LV volumes and brachial blood pressure measurements. The following variables were quantified: Maximal elastance (Emax ) reflecting contractility, Ea , ventriculoarterial coupling (Ea /Emax ), SW, potential energy, external power, energy per ejected volume, and efficiency.

RESULTS

All PV-loop variables were significantly different in MI patients compared to healthy volunteers, including contractility (Emax : 1.34 ± 0.48 versus 1.50 ± 0.41 mmHg/mL, p = .024), ventriculoarterial coupling (Ea /Emax : 1.27 ± 0.61 versus 0.73 ± 0.17, p < .001) and SW (0.96 ± 0.32 versus 1.38 ± 0.32 J, p < .001). These variables correlated to both MaR and IS (Emax : r2  = 0.25 and r2  = 0.29; Ea /Emax : r2  = 0.36 and r2  = 0.41; SW: r2  = 0.21 and r2  = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Noninvasive PV-loops provide physiological information beyond conventional diagnostic variables, such as ejection fraction, early after MI, including measures of contractility, ventriculoarterial coupling, and SW.

Non-invasive pressure-volume loops using the elastance model and CMR: a porcine validation at transient pre-loads

Aims

Pressure-volume (PV) loops have utility in the evaluation of cardiac pathophysiology but require invasive measurements. Recently, a time-varying elastance model to derive PV loops non-invasively was proposed, using left ventricular (LV) volume by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and brachial cuff pressure as inputs. Validation was performed using CMR and pressure measurements acquired on the same day, but not simultaneously, and without varying pre-loads. This study validates the non-invasive elastance model used to estimate PV loops at varying pre-loads, compared with simultaneous measurements of invasive pressure and volume from real-time CMR, acquired concurrent to an inferior vena cava (IVC) occlusion.

Methods and results

We performed dynamic PV loop experiments under CMR guidance in 15 pigs (n = 7 naïve, n = 8 with ischaemic cardiomyopathy). Pre-load was altered by IVC occlusion, while simultaneously acquiring invasive LV pressures and volumes from real-time CMR. Pairing pressure and volume signals yielded invasive PV loops, and model-based PV loops were derived using real-time LV volumes. Haemodynamic parameters derived from invasive and model-based PV loops were compared. Across 15 pigs, 297 PV loops were recorded. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) agreement was excellent between model-based and invasive parameters: stroke work (bias = 0.007 ± 0.03 J, ICC = 0.98), potential energy (bias = 0.02 ± 0.03 J, ICC = 0.99), ventricular energy efficiency (bias = -0.7 ± 2.7%, ICC = 0.98), contractility (bias = 0.04 ± 0.1 mmHg/mL, ICC = 0.97), and ventriculoarterial coupling (bias = 0.07 ± 0.15, ICC = 0.99). All haemodynamic parameters differed between naïve and cardiomyopathy animals (P < 0.05). The invasive vs. model-based PV loop dice similarity coefficient was 0.88 ± 0.04.

Conclusion

An elastance model-based estimation of PV loops and associated haemodynamic parameters provided accurate measurements at transient loading conditions compared with invasive PV loops.

Patients with volume-loaded right ventricle - quantification of left ventricular hemodynamic response to intervention measured by noninvasive pressure-volume loops

Volume loading of the right ventricle (RV) in patients with atrial septal defect (ASD) and patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (rToF) affects the pumping mechanics of the left ventricle (LV). Intervention of the lesion will relieve the RV volume load however quantifiable impact on exercise capacity, arrhytmias or death are limited. A possible explanation could be remaining effects on the function of the LV. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate if hemodynamics of the LV differs between patients with RV volume load due to ASD or rToF and healthy controls and if they change after intervention. Eighteen patients with ASD, 17 patients with rToF and 16 healthy controls underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and maximal exercise test with continuous gas analysis. Reexamination was performed 13 ± 2 months after closure of the ASD in 13 of the patients and 10 ± 4 months after pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) in 9 of the patients with rToF. Non-invasive PV-loops from CMR and brachial pressures were analyzed. Stroke work (SW) and potential energy (PE) increased after ASD closure but not in ToF patients after valve repair. Patients with ASD or rToF had higher contractility and arterial elastance than controls. No major effects were seen in LV energetics or in peak VO2 after ASD closure or PVR. Peak VO2 correlated positively with SW and PE in patients with ASD (r = 0.54, p < 0.05; r = 0.61, p < 0.01) and controls (r = 0.72, p < 0.01; r = 0.53, p < 0.05) to approximately the same degree as peak VO2 and end-diastolic volume (EDV) or end-systolic volume (ESV). In ToF patients there was no correlation between PV loop parameters and peak VO2 even if correlation was found between peak VO2 and EDV or ESV. In conclusion, the LV seems to adapt its pumping according to anatomic circumstances without losing efficiency, however there are indications of persistent vascular dysfunction, expressed as high arterial elastance, which might have impact on exercise performance and prognosis. Future studies might elucidate if the duration of RV volume load and decreased LV filling have any impact on the ability of the vascular function to normalize after ASD closure or PVR.