Comparison of long-term mortality between living alone patients vs. living together patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention

Outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock

BACKGROUND

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) may reduce the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events but remains challenging. The study aim was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI with CS.

METHODS

We conducted an observational cohort study of patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI between April 2004 and December 2017 at Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death (CVD) during the median 3-year follow-up. We performed a landmark analysis for the incidence of CVD from 0 day to 1 year and from 1 to 10 years.

RESULTS

Among the 1758 STEMI patients in the cohort, 212 (12.1 %) patients with CS showed significantly higher 30-day CVD rate on admission than those without (26.4 % vs 2.9 %). Landmark Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that CVD from day 0 to year 1 was significantly higher in the patients with CS (log-rank p < 0.0001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that CS was significantly associated with higher cardiovascular mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 11.8; 95%confidence intervals, 7.78-18.1; p < 0.0001), but the mortality rates from 1 to 10 years were comparable (log-rank p = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

The cardiovascular 1-year mortality rate for patients with STEMI was higher for those with CS on admission than without, but the mortality rates of >1 year were comparable. Surviving the early phase is essential for patients with STEMI and CS to improve long-term outcomes.

Living alone predicts poor prognosis among patients with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Living alone as a proxy for social isolation has been considered to increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. We thus investigated the impact of living alone on mortality in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients.

METHODS

Subjects comprised 277 AMI patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Associations between all-cause and cardiac deaths after PCI and baseline characteristics including living alone and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score were assessed.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients (30%) were living alone. Thirty patients died after PCI, including 20 cardiac deaths. Patients living alone showed higher incidences of both all-cause and cardiac deaths compared with patients not living alone (18% vs. 8%, P  = 0.019 and 14% vs. 4%, P  = 0.004). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis models showed living alone [hazard ratio (HR), 2.60; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.20-5.62; P  = 0.016 and HR, 4.17; 95% CI, 1.60-10.84; P  = 0.003] and GRACE risk score (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03; P  = 0.003 and HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; P  < 0.001) correlated significantly with all-cause and cardiac deaths. Cox proportional hazards modeling revealed that patients living alone with GRACE risk score ≥162 derived from the receiver-operating characteristic curve showed a significantly greater risk of all-cause death than patients not living alone with GRACE risk score <162 (HR 16.57; 95% CI 6.67-41.21; P  < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Among AMI patients, living alone represents an independent risk factor for all-cause and cardiac deaths after PCI, separate from GRACE risk score. Furthermore, AMI patients living alone with high GRACE risk scores may experience an additively increased risk of mortality after PCI.

Comparisons of Patients Living Alone versus Living with Others in Acute Coronary Syndrome

We aimed to examine the relationship of living arrangements (i.e., living alone or living with others) with background, clinical severity, preintervention culprit lesion plaque morphology, and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Among 1,683 consecutive patients with ACS, we retrospectively compared patients living alone ( n  = 318) versus living with others ( n  = 1,362). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings, which are high-resolution intracoronary imaging devices, were analyzed in patients with preintervention OCT and compared between patients living alone ( n  = 174) versus those living with others ( n  = 665). Older (median; 69 vs. 67 y, p  = 0.046) and female (31 vs. 17%, p  < 0.001) patients more frequently lived alone. Frequency of achieving a time interval of 6 hours or less from ACS onset to admission was lower in patients living alone (56 vs. 63%, p  = 0.022). Clinical presentation was more severe in patients living alone (Killip II/III/IV; 27 vs. 22%, p  = 0.029). Plaque morphology evaluated by OCT was similar between groups (plaque rapture; 48 vs. 48%, p  = 0.171). Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed higher rates of cardiac mortality during 2-year follow-up period in patients living alone [13.9 vs. 8.5%, hazard ratio (HR) 1.604, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.112-2.313, p  = 0.010]. After traditional cardiovascular risk factors and clinical severity upon admission had been adjusted, living alone was an independent predictor of cardiac mortality in ACS patients (HR 1.582, 95% CI 1.056-2.371, p  = 0.026). Living alone was independently associated with 2-year cardiacmortality in ACS patients after adjusting for background and presentation and might be unrelated to the development of atherosclerosis.

The Prognostic Implications of Living Alone on Long-Term Mortality in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Living alone is associated with increased cardiac events and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. However, the prognostic impact of living alone with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) still remains unclear. In the present study, we examined the relationship between living alone and long-term mortality in patients with CCS who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Consecutive 830 patients with CCS who underwent PCI were enrolled and divided into 2 groups according to whether or not they were living alone at the time of admission (living alone group and non-living alone group). We compared the clinical characteristics between the 2 groups and followed up cardiac mortality. The living alone group was younger compared with the non-living alone group (67.5 versus 70.7 years old, P = 0.017). The prevalence of comorbidities, including coronary risk factors, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, stroke, peripheral artery disease, coronary lesion characteristics, laboratory data, and left ventricular ejection fraction, were comparable between the 2 groups. During the follow-up period (median 1,622 days), 52 cardiac deaths occurred. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, cardiac mortality was significantly higher in the living alone group than in the non-living alone group (24% versus 11%, P = 0.008). In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses after adjusting for possible confounding factors, living alone was an independent predictor of cardiac mortality (hazard ratio, 2.426, 95% confidence interval 1.225-4.804, P = 0.011).Among CCS patients who underwent PCI, living alone was associated with high long-term cardiac mortality.

Development and Validation of a Prediction Rule for Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events in High-Risk Myocardial Infarction Patients After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background and Aims

We aimed to develop a clinical prediction tool to improve the prognosis of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) among high-risk myocardial infarction (MI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

The present study was a prospective and observational study. A total of 4151 consecutive MI patients who underwent primary PCI at Fuwai Hospital in Beijing, China (January 2010 and June 2017) were enrolled. Forty-eight patients without follow-up data were excluded from the study. The pre-specified criteria (Supplementary Information 1) were chosen to enroll MI patients at high risk for MACCE complications after PCI.

Results

The full model included seven variables, with a risk score of 160 points. Derivation and validation cohort models predicting MACCE had C-statistics of 0.695 and 0.673. The area under the curve (AUC) of the survival receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) for predicting MACCE was 0.991 and 0.883 in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively.

Conclusion

The predicted model was internally validated and calibrated in large cohorts of patients with high-risk MI receiving primary PCI to predict MACCE and showed modest accuracy in the derivation and validation cohorts.

Bridging Care Transition After Hospitalization for Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Interventions

ABSTRACT

Treatment fragmentation between hospitals and the community can result in catastrophic outcomes; uninterrupted treatment with anticoagulant and platelet aggregation inhibitors is particularly important. We assessed the proportion and characteristics of patients who did not visit their primary community-based physician within 1 week of discharge from our department of cardiovascular medicine and the proportion that failed to procure essential drugs at the community pharmacy. We prospectively studied 423 patients who were discharged from our department. They were provided detailed explanations, tablets for 7 days, prescriptions, and a printed drug plan. We traced the time from discharge until a visit with a primary community-based physician, and the time until the procurement of medications, using our computerized community-hospital-integrated system. Complete data were available for 313 patients, of whom 220 were treated with anticoagulants or platelet aggregation inhibitors. For 175 patients, these drugs were initiated during index hospitalizations. Only 1 patient did not receive platelet aggregation inhibitors despite recommendations. Seventy-nine patients (25%) first visited their primary care physicians more than 1 week after discharge. Predictors for delayed visits were living alone (hazard ratio 1.91) and having an in-house caregiver (hazard ratio 2.01). In conclusion, all but 1 patient continued drug therapy after discharge from the hospital. The simple predischarge steps included patient education and provision of a 1-week supply of tablets and prescriptions. Treatment continuation was independent of visits to the community-based primary physician. Patients living alone or with an in-house caregiver more often delayed visits to primary physicians yet continued relevant drug therapy.