Impact of segmentectomy and lobectomy on non-lung cancer death in early-stage lung cancer patients

Risk of Death From Other Diseases in Lung Cancer Patients After Sublobar Resection Versus Lobectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A recent Japanese phase three clinical trial for lung cancer suggested a possible advantage of segmentectomy over lobectomy in terms of death from other diseases. This study aimed to compare the risk of death from other diseases based on surgical procedures in lung cancer patients without recurrence.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 2121 patients without disease recurrence after curative resection for lung cancer at our institution. Patient characteristics and overall survival were compared between sublobar resection and lobectomy.

RESULTS

The sublobar group (n = 595) had a significantly higher proportion of women, non-smokers, patients without comorbidities, patients with a history of other cancers, and patients with earlier-staged disease when compared with the lobectomy group (n = 1526). The overall survival was significantly longer in the sublobar group than in the lobectomy group (p = 0.0034). After adjusting for background characteristics in an analysis of 488 patients, the overall survival had a trend to be longer in the sublobar group than in the lobectomy group (p = 0.071).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that the risk of death from other diseases was potentially higher after lobectomy than after sublobar resection. Although several clinical factors could influence the results, these results may support the benefit of sublobar resection, assuming that the curability of both procedures is similar.

Long-term outcomes and risk factors for recurrence after lung segmentectomy

OBJECTIVES

The long-term oncological outcomes and risk factors for recurrence after lung segmentectomy are unclear. The aims of this study were to investigate the long-term prognosis and to evaluate risk factors for recurrence after segmentectomy.

METHODS

Between January 2008 and December 2012, a total of 177 patients underwent segmentectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. The median follow-up period was 120.1 months. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival curves were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method with a log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to identify significant factors that predicted recurrence.

RESULTS

The study included 177 patients with a median age of 67 years. The median operative time was 155 min. No 30-day deaths were observed. Nine patients (5.1%) had recurrences: loco-regional in 3, distant in 3 and both in 3. The 5-year and 10-year recurrence-free survival rates were 89.7% and 79.8%, and the OS rates were 90.9% and 80.4%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, the risk factor associated with recurrence was a pure solid tumour [hazard ratio, 23.151; 95% confidence interval 2.575-208.178; P = 0.005]. The non-pure solid tumour group had a significantly better probability of survival (5-year OS: 95.4% vs 77.2%; 10-year OS: 86.5% vs 61.8%; P < 0.0001). A total of 113 patients received preoperative positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Patients with a higher maximum standardized uptake value had a significantly higher recurrence rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Segmentectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer produced acceptable long-term outcomes. Pure solid radiographic appearance was associated with recurrence and decreased survival.

Sublobar resection is not always superior for early-stage lung cancer in high-risk patients

OBJECTIVES

The phase III trial, Japan Clinical Oncology Group 0802, illustrated the superiority of sublobar resection for early-stage lung cancer in terms of overall survival, with more non-lung cancer-related deaths after a lobectomy. The advantages of sublobar resection may be more pronounced in high-risk patients. The goal of this study was to elucidate the prognoses of high-risk patients.

METHODS

Patients with a risk of being ineligible for Japan Clinical Oncology Group 0802 for general conditions were classified as the high-risk group, and those who were not at risk of being ineligible were classified as the normal-risk group. Overall survival and prognostic factors were analysed in the high-risk group.

RESULTS

There were 254 (19.4%) and 1054 patients in the high- and normal-risk groups, respectively. Five-year survival rates were 94.5% and 79.1% in the normal-risk and high-risk groups, respectively (P < 0.001). More patients in the high-risk group died of lung cancer (P < 0.001) and non-lung cancer deaths (P < 0.001) than patients in the normal-risk group.In the high-risk group, 151 lobectomies and 103 sublobar resections were performed. There was no significant difference in the numbers of lung cancer deaths and of non-lung cancer deaths between the procedures. Stratified survival analyses showed that the diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide  < 40% tended to favour sublobar resection; being female and having a high carcinoembryonic antigen level tended to favour a lobectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Sublobar resection is not always superior for early-stage lung cancer. Even in such cases, the surgical method should be determined by taking into consideration the patient's background and lung cancer surveillance.

Segmentectomy versus lobectomy for small-sized pure solid non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Segmentectomy has been recommended for ground glass opacity (GGO)-dominant small-sized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or those with GGO component. Pure solid NSCLC is a special sub-type and has an inferior prognosis. Whether segmentectomy could achieve comparable long-term outcomes with lobectomy for pure solid small-sized NSCLC remained controversial. This study aimed to compare the prognosis of segmentectomy and lobectomy for pure solid NSCLC.

METHODS

NSCLC patients with a pure solid nodule (≤2 cm) who received segmentectomy or lobectomy between January 2010 and June 2019 were retrospectively screened. Log-rank test, univariable, and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used for prognostic comparison. Further, the propensity score matching analysis was adopted to yield a matched cohort.

RESULTS

After screening, 344 pure solid NSCLC patients with a median follow-up time of 56 months were reserved. Among them, 98 patients underwent segmentectomy and the other 246 subjects received lobectomy. The lobectomy group had a larger tumor size, a higher rate of lymph node metastasis than the segmentectomy arm. Generally, patients with segmentectomy had a better disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.011) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.028) than those with lobectomy. However, the multivariable Cox regression analysis indicated that no significant survival difference existed between segmentectomy and lobectomy after adjusting the potential confounding factors (DFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-1.77, p = 0.476; OS: HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.08-1.59, p = 0.178). Consistently, in the propensity score matched cohort, segmentectomy (n = 74) yielded similar DFS (p = 0.960) and OS (p = 0.320) with lobectomy (n = 74).

CONCLUSIONS

Segmentectomy could achieve comparable oncological outcomes with lobectomy for pure solid small-sized NSCLC.