2022 Joint ESC/EACTS review of the 2018 guideline recommendations on the revascularization of left main coronary artery disease in patients at low surgical risk and anatomy suitable for PCI or CABG

Hybrid coronary revascularization versus traditional coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

The current recommended intervention for significant left main (LM) stenosis, especially in patients with complex and high SYNTAX score disease, is coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) combines robotic coronary artery bypass and percutaneous coronary intervention, offering a less invasive approach for patients with LM disease.

OBJECTIVES

We compare clinical outcomes between HCR and CABG in patients with LM disease.

METHODS

We retrospectively screened all patients treated for LM disease between 2019 and 2023 at a single institution. Propensity matching was used for baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 30 days, 6 months and 1 year. Secondary outcomes included death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization and stroke.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 761 patients treated for LM disease, 59 HCR patients were propensity matched to 59 CABG patients and were included in the final analysis. SYNTAX score was >33 for 49.1 % of HCR patients and 67.3 % of CABG patients (p = 0.15). Hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for HCR patients compared to CABG (4.07 days vs. 7.58 days, p < 0.001). MACE were significantly lower in the HCR group at 30 days (0 % vs 10.2 %; p = 0.01), 6 months (0 % vs 17 %; p = 0.002) and 1 year (2.4 % vs 20.5 %; p = 0.01) compared to CABG group. Additionally, there was a lower rate of repeat revascularization at 6 months in the HCR group (0 % vs 10.9 %; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study demonstrates that HCR is a safe and viable alternative to CABG in patients with LM disease. Randomized clinical trials comparing the two treatment modalities are needed to confirm these findings.

Diagnosis of Turner syndrome after presenting with ischemic cardiomyopathy: A case report

Untreated Turner syndrome increases the risk of ischemic cardiomyopathy. We report a 44-year-old Chinese woman who was diagnosed with Turner syndrome owing to symptoms of ischemic cardiomyopathy and heart failure confirmed through cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, coronary angiography, and abnormal brain natriuretic peptide levels. The patient had a short stature, underdeveloped uterus with primary amenorrhea, and congenital left upper pulmonary vein reflux to the right atrium; she was diagnosed with Turner syndrome through karyotype analysis. Because she refused coronary artery bypass grafting, she received aspirin, torasemide, atorvastatin, bisoprolol, sacubitril/valsartan, empagliflozin, spironolactone, and complex packing estradiol tablets/estradiol and dydrogesterone tablets (1-10 mg). After 3 months of treatment, her heart failure symptoms disappeared. Ischemic heart disease is a high-risk complication in patients with Turner syndrome. Prompt diagnosis and comprehensive management through a multidisciplinary approach can improve patient outcomes. Further evidence is needed to establish a secondary prevention strategy for Turner syndrome with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Application of optical coherence tomography angiography to study retinal and choroidal vascular changes in patients with first-time coronary artery stenosis

OBJECTIVE

To study the changes in retinal and choroidal vessels in patients with coronary artery stenosis via optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

METHODS

A total of 100 subjects were enrolled in this study and divided into two groups: the observation group consisted of 50 patients with angina who were first diagnosed with coronary artery stenosis, and the control group consisted of 50 healthy adults without angina symptoms. All of the subjects underwent OCTA to investigate changes in retinochoroidal vessel density in patients with a first diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis. The parameters included superficial capillary plexus density (SCD), deep capillary plexus density (DCD), retinal peripapillary capillary plexus density(RPD), the choroidal vascular index (CVI), and the macular foveal avascular zone(FAZ area, perimeter, acircularity index, FD-300 vessel density).

RESULTS

SCD and DCD in the coronary artery stenosis group were lower than those in the control group (P = 0.045 and P = 0.034, respectively), the CVI was lower than that in the control group (P = 0.029), the FAZ perimeter and acircularity index were greater than those in the control group (P = 0.003,P = 0.024). Logistic regression and ROC curve analysis revealed that FAZ perimeter was the most significant risk factor for predicting coronary artery stenosis (P = 0.005, AUC = 0.664), and the cut-off value for FAZ perimeter was 2.065 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a first diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis, both retinal and choroidal blood flow are reduced. FAZ perimeter is a risk factor for predicting the occurrence of coronary artery stenosis.

Drug-Coated Balloon-Based Treatment of Left Main True Bifurcation Lesion

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data regarding drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment in the context of left main (LM) true bifurcation lesions.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DCB-based treatment for unprotected LM true bifurcation lesions.

METHODS

A total of 39 patients with LM true bifurcation lesion (Medina: 1,1,1/0,1,1/1,0,1) who were successfully treated with DCB alone or in combination with drug-eluting stent (DES) were retrospectively enrolled into the DCB-based group. They were compared with 39 propensity-matched patients who were treated with second-generation DES from the COBIS III registry (n = 2648). Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent or target lesion thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization at the 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between the groups, except for the prevalence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions (41.0% in DCB-based group vs. 17.9% in DES-only group, p = 0.047). In the DCB-based group, 59.0% of the patients (n = 23) underwent DCB-only treatment. There were no cases of abrupt vessel closure requiring treatment following DCB application. The MACE were comparable between both groups (12.8% in DCB-based group vs. 17.9% in DES-only group, p = 0.861) after 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with unprotected LM true bifurcation lesions, DCB-based treatment demonstrated comparable clinical outcomes at the 2-year follow-up when compared to DES-only treatment. DCB-based treatment could be considered a safe and effective alternative to DES for carefully selected patients who have achieved satisfactory predilation results (Impact of DCB Treatment in De Novo Coronary Lesion; NCT04619277).

Comparing percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting for left main stenosis on the basis of current regional registry evidence

Objectives

There is an ongoing debate whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the better choice for treatment of left main (LM) stenosis. We aimed to provide external validation for the recently reviewed guideline recommendations for invasive LM therapy by evaluating the impact of CABG or PCI on long-term survival from local reports of different regions in the world. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to address contemporary registry studies comparing PCI and CABG for patients with LM stenosis.

Methods

Three databases were assessed. Our primary end point was long-term all-cause mortality. Secondary end points were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, stroke, and periprocedural mortality. Reconstruction of time-to-event data was performed.

Results

A total of 2477 studies were retrieved. Seven studies with risk-adjusted populations were selected for the analysis. Four studies favored CABG and 3 studies showed no difference for the primary end point. Compared with PCI, patients who underwent CABG had lower risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.26, P < .01) and MACE (hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-1.69, P < .01) during follow-up. Moreover, PCI was associated with more myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, but less strokes when compared with CABG. There was no significant difference regarding periprocedural mortality. The MACE rate was lower after CABG in both early and late phase, which outweighs the higher rate of periprocedural stroke after CABG.

Conclusions

Regional registry evidence supports the current notion of superior long-term endpoints with CABG compared with PCI for the treatment of LM stenosis over time.

Long-term Follow-up Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Unprotected Left Main

Background

Elective unprotected left main (ULM) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has long-term mortality rates comparable to surgical revascularization, thanks to advances in drug-eluting stent (DES) design, improved PCI techniques, and frequent use of intravascular imaging. However, urgent PCI of ULM culprit lesions remains associated with high in-hospital mortality and unfavourable long-term outcomes, including DES restenosis and stent thrombosis (ST). This analysis aimed to examine the long-term outcomes and healing of DES implanted in ULM during primary PCI using high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging.

Methods

A total of 15 consecutive patients undergoing long-term OCT follow-up of ULM primary PCI from a high-volume center were included in this analysis. During the index primary PCI all subjects underwent angio-guided DES implantation, and follow-up was uneventful in all but one subject who had a non-target PCI lesion. The primary endpoint was the percentage of covered, uncovered, and malappossed stent struts at long-term follow-up. Secondary endpoints included quantitative and qualitative OCT measurements. For the left main bifurcation, a separate analysis was performed for three different segments: left main (LM), polygon of confluence (POC) and distal main branch (dMB), in all cases.

Results

The average follow-up interval until OCT was 1580 ± 1260 days. Despite aorto-ostial stent protrusions in 40% of patients, optimal image quality was achieved in 93.3% of cases. There were higher rates of malapposed (11.4 ± 16.6 vs. 13.1 ± 8.3 vs. 0.3 ± 0.5%; p < 0.001) and lower rates of covered struts (81.7 ± 16.8 vs. 83.7 ± 9.2 vs. 92.4 ± 6.8%; p = 0.041) observed for the LM and POC segment compared to the dMB. Significantly malapposed stent struts (>400 μm) were less likely to be covered at follow-up, than struts with a measured strut to vessel wall distance of <400 μm (15.4 ± 21.6 vs. 24.8 ± 23.9%; p = 0.011). Neoatherosclerosis was observed in 5 (33.3%) and restenotic neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) in 2 (13.3%) patients, requiring PCI in 33.3% of patients.

Conclusions

Long-term OCT examination of DES implanted during primary PCI for culprit ULM lesions demonstrated high rates of incomplete strut coverage, late malapposition, and high subclinical DES failure rates. These negative OCT results highlight the need for image optimization strategies during primary PCI to improve DES-related long-term outcomes.

Lipoprotein(a) as an Independent Predictor of Elevated SYNTAX Score

Background/Objectives: Increased lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level is associated with elevated possibility of atherosclerosis progression. SYNTAX score enables to grade the anatomy of coronary arteries. To identify the impact of increased Lp(a) level on SYNTAX score in individuals with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: In our analysis, we enrolled 173 consecutive adult patients hospitalized for AMI in a tertiary cardiology center from December 2022 to August 2023. Patient characteristics were compared for patients with SYNTAX score ≥ 23 (64 patients) and SYNTAX score < 23 (109 patients). The SYNTAX score was estimated based on the results of coronary angiography. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the factors associated with SYNTAX score. Results: Individuals with the SYNTAX score ≥ 23 were more likely to have arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, significant stenosis in the left main coronary artery, and higher Lp(a) levels than those with SYNTAX < 23 (all p < 0.05). On univariate analysis, age (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08, p = 0.001), Lp(a) levels (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, p = 0.001), and arterial hypertension (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.26-5.74, p = 0.011) were associated with SYNTAX score ≥ 23. Multivariable determinants of SYNTAX score ≥ 23 were as follows: Lp(a) levels (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, p = 0.029), and age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, p = 0.005). The cut-off value for Lp(a) 166.16 nmol/L identifies patients with SYNTAX score ≥ 23 with 97% sensitivity and 44% specificity (area under curve 0.78, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Elevated Lp(a) concentration is associated with a higher SYNTAX score. A cut-off value of Lp(a) above 166.16 nmol/L allows us to identify subjects with SYNTAX score ≥ 23 with good specificity and sensitivity.

Significance of diabetes mellitus status in patients undergoing percutaneous left main coronary artery intervention

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a modifiable risk factor for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Treatment with insulin correlates with advanced disease and has been associated with excess cardiovascular risk, but evidence on outcomes of patients with insulin-treated DM (ITDM) undergoing left main percutaneous coronary intervention (LMPCI) remains scarce.

AIMS

The aim of the presented study is to evluate the risk attributable to DM and ITDM in patients undergoing LMPCI.

METHODS

We included 869 patients undergoing PCI for unprotected LMCAD. The cohort was divided into three subgroups based on diabetic status: No DM, ITDM, and Non-ITDM. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as a composite of death, spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke at 1 year. Results were adjusted for clinically relevant baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Amongst participants, 58.7% had no DM, 25.9% non-ITDM, and 15.4% ITDM. Diabetics were younger and more likely to be female. They also exhibited higher body mass index as well as prevalence of comorbidities, including hypertension, anemia, and chronic kidney disease. The number of bifurcation lesions and stents used was similar between groups. At 1 year, when compared to no DM, ITDM (25.4% vs. 10.0%, p < 0.01) but not non-ITDM (10.8% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.94) demonstrated higher MACCE. This finding was driven by increased risk of MI. Mortality was 8.4%, 7.8%, and 17.2% for no DM, Non-ITDM, and ITDM, respectively. Results remained unchanged after adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

In a rather contemporary patient population undergoing PCI for LMCAD, ITDM but not non-ITDM was associated with higher risk of 1-year MACCE, primarily driven by MI.

Traditional Chinese medicine lowering lipid levels and cardiovascular events across baseline lipid levels among coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Dyslipidemia is a critical driver in the development of coronary heart disease (CHD), which further exacerbates the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) plays an important role in the regulation of lipid levels and improvement of prognosis. However, few systematic reviews report whether the efficacy of CHM therapy for regulating lipid levels and lowering cardiovascular events is associated with baseline lipid levels.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials assessing efficacy of CHM for lipid profiles and MACEs among patients with CHD were searched in six databases. Two authors independently extracted studies according to a predesigned form. Cochrane risk of bias tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system were used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. The primary outcomes were blood lipid levels and MACEs including cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, revascularization, angina pectoris, heart failure, and non-fatal stroke across baseline lipid levels. The secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary outcomes.

Results

A total of 23 trials with 7,316 participants were included in this study. Altogether 377 cardiovascular events occurred in 3,670 patients in the CHM group, while 717 events occurred in 3,646 patients in the Western medicine-alone group. Compared with the Western medicine alone, additional CHM significantly lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) [MD = -0.46, 95% CI (-0.60 to -0.32), P < 0.00001, I 2 = 96%]. The risk reduction in MACEs associated with CHM vs. Western medicine therapy was 0.52 [95% CI (0.47-0.58), P < 0.00001, I 2  = 0%], but varied by baseline LDL-C level (P = 0.03 for interaction). Triglycerides (TG) level was also significantly lowered by additional CHM vs. Western medicine alone [MD = -0.27, 95% CI (-0.34 to -0.20), P < 0.00001, I 2 = 81%], and risk reduction for MACEs also varied with baseline TG, with greater risk reduction in higher baseline TG subgroups (P = 0.03 for interaction). Similar results were observed with total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Conclusion

Compared with Western medicine alone, additional CHM was associated with lower risk of cardiovascular events and improvement of lipid profiles. Risk reduction for cardiovascular events was associated with baseline LDL-C and TG levels.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023425791.

Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review of all available evidence on the feasibility and safety of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

A systematic literature search in PubMed, MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed to identify all relevant studies evaluating outcomes of MICS CABG among patients with multivessel CAD and including at least 15 patients with no restriction on the publication date.

RESULTS

A total of 881 studies were identified, of which 26 studies met the eligibility criteria. The studies included a total of 7,556 patients. The average patient age was 63.3 years (range 49.5 to 69.0 years), male patients were an average of 77.8% (54.0% to 89.8%), and body mass index was 29.8 kg/m2 (24.5 to 30.1 kg/m2). Early mortality and stroke were on average 0.6% (range 0% to 2.0%) and 0.4% (range 0% to 1.3%), respectively. The average number of grafts was 2.8 (range 2.1 to 3.7). The average length of hospital stay was 5.6 days (range 3.1 to 9.3 days).

CONCLUSIONS

MICS CABG appears to be a safe method in well-selected patients with multivessel CAD. This approach is concentrated at dedicated centers, and there is no widespread application, although it has potential to be widely applicable as an alternative for surgical revascularization. However, large randomized controlled studies with longer follow-up are still required to compare the outcomes with conventional CABG and other revascularization strategies.

Cardiac Surgery 2023 Reviewed

We reviewed the cardiac surgical literature for 2023. PubMed displayed almost 34,000 hits for the search term "cardiac surgery AND 2023." We used a PRISMA approach for a results-oriented summary. Key manuscripts addressed the mid- and long-term effects of invasive treatment options in patient populations with coronary artery disease (CAD), comparing interventional therapy (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) with surgery (coronary artery bypass graft [CABG]). The literature in 2023 again confirmed the excellent long-term outcomes of CABG compared with PCI in patients with left main stenosis, specifically in anatomically complex chronic CAD, but even in elderly patients, generating further support for an infarct-preventative effect as a prognostic mechanism of CABG. For aortic stenosis, a previous trend of an early advantage for transcatheter (transcatheter aortic valve implantation [TAVI]) and a later advantage for surgical (surgical aortic valve replacement) treatment was also re-confirmed by many studies. Only the Evolut Low Risk trial maintained an early advantage of TAVI over 4 years. In the mitral and tricuspid field, the number of interventional publications increased tremendously. A pattern emerges that clinical benefits are associated with repair quality, making residual regurgitation not irrelevant. While surgery is more invasive, it currently generates the highest repair rates and longest durability. For terminal heart failure treatment, donor pool expansion for transplantation and reducing adverse events in assist device therapy were issues in 2023. Finally, the aortic diameter related to adverse events and technical aspects of surgery dominated in aortic surgery. This article summarizes publications perceived as important by us. It cannot be complete nor free of individual interpretation, but provides up-to-date information for patient-specific decision-making.

Do the Few Dictate Care for the Many? Revascularisation Considerations That Go Beyond the Guidelines

The burden of coronary artery disease (CAD) is large and growing, commonly presenting with comorbidities and older age. Patients may benefit from coronary revascularisation with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), yet half of patients with CAD who would benefit from revascularisation fall outside the eligibility criteria of trials to date. As such, the choice of revascularisation procedures varies depending on the CAD anatomy and complexity, surgical risk and comorbidities, the patient's preferences and values, and the treating team's expertise. The recent American guidelines on coronary revascularisation are comprehensive in describing recommendations for PCI, CABG, or conservative management in patients with CAD. However, individual challenging patient presentations cannot be fully captured in guidelines. The aim of this narrative review is to summarise common clinical scenarios that are not sufficiently described by contemporary clinical guidelines and trials in order to inform heart team members and trainees about the nuanced considerations and available evidence to manage such cases. We discuss clinical cases that fall beyond the current guidelines and summarise the relevant evidence evaluating coronary revascularisation for these patients. In addition, we highlight gaps in knowledge based on a lack of research (eg, ineligibility of certain patient populations), underrepresentation in research (eg, underenrollment of female and non-White patients), and the surge in newer minimally invasive and hybrid techniques. We argue that ultimately, evidence-based medicine, patient preference, shared decision making, and effective heart team communications are necessary to best manage complex CAD presentations potentially benefitting from revascularisation with CABG or PCI.