Survival Outcomes of Patients With Mediastinal Germ Cell Tumors: Experience of a Cancer Center in South America

PURPOSE

Mediastinal germ cell tumors (GCT) are rare neoplasms associated with poor survival prognosis. Due to their low incidence, limited information is available about this disease in South America. The objective of this study is to report the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with mediastinal GCT in a cancer center in Colombia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with mediastinal GCT treated at the National Cancer Institute at Bogota (Colombia) between 2008 and 2020. Survival curves were presented using the Kaplan-Meier method. Chi-square and Cox proportional hazard model tests were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were included in the study. Of them, 60 were male and 51 (83.6%) of whom had non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT). Twenty-nine patients (47.5%) presented with superior vena cava syndrome, and 18 (29.5%) patients had extrapulmonary metastatic involvement. The three-year overall survival (OS) of NSGCT patients was 26%. The 3-year OS of NSGCT patients who underwent surgical resection of residual mediastinal mass after chemotherapy was 59%. Non-surgical management after first-line chemotherapy was associated with a worse survival prognosis in NSGCT patients (p = 0.002). Ten patients with mediastinal seminomatous germ cell tumors (SCGT) achieved a 3-year OS of 100%.

CONCLUSION

Mediastinal NSGCT had poor outcomes. Surgery of the residual mass after first-line chemotherapy seems to improve the outcome of NSGCT patients. Advanced disease at presentation may reflect inadequate access to reference cancer centers in Colombia and potentially explain poor survival outcomes in this cohort. On the other hand, mediastinal SCGT is a biologically different disease; most patients will achieve disease remission and long-term survival with first-line chemotherapy.

How to classify, diagnose, treat and follow-up extragonadal germ cell tumors? A systematic review of available evidence

PURPOSE

To present the current evidence and the development of studies in recent years on the management of extragonadal germ cell tumors (EGCT).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline and the Cochrane Library. Studies within the search period (January 2010 to February 2021) that addressed the classification, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and follow-up of extragonadal tumors were included. Risk of bias was assessed and relevant data were extracted in evidence tables.

RESULTS

The systematic search identified nine studies. Germ cell tumors (GCT) arise predominantly from within the testis, but about 5% of the tumors are primarily located extragonadal. EGCT are localized primarily mediastinal or retroperitoneal in the midline of the body. EGCT patients are classified according to the IGCCCG classification. Consecutively, all mediastinal non-seminomatous EGCT patients belong to the "poor prognosis" group. In contrast mediastinal seminoma and both retroperitoneal seminoma and non-seminoma patients seem to have a similar prognosis as patients with gonadal GCTs and metastasis at theses respective sites. The standard chemotherapy regimen for patients with a EGCT consists of 3-4 cycles (good vs intermediate prognosis) of bleomycin, etoposid, cisplatin (BEP); however, due to their very poor prognosis patients with non-seminomatous mediastinal GCT should receive a dose-intensified or high-dose chemotherapy approach upfront on an individual basis and should thus be referred to expert centers Ifosfamide may be exchanged for bleomycin in cases of additional pulmonary metastasis due to subsequently planned resections. In general patients with non-seminomatous EGCT, residual tumor resection (RTR) should be performed after chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

In general, non-seminomatous EGCT have a poorer prognosis compared to testicular GCT, while seminomatous EGGCT seem to have a similar prognosis to patients with metastatic testicular seminoma. The current insights on EGCT are limited, since all data are mainly based on case series and studies with small patient numbers and non-comparative studies. In general, systemic treatment should be performed like in testicular metastatic GCTs but upfront dose intensification of chemotherapy should be considered for mediastinal non-seminoma patients. Thus, EGCT should be referred to interdisciplinary centers with utmost experience in the treatment of germ cell tumors.

Salvage Resection of Mediastinal Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor in a Patient with Extrathoracic Involvement upon Progression following High-Dose Chemotherapy

Primary mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumor with extrathoracic metastases is associated with a very high mortality rate, and there is no consensus regarding optimal upfront therapy. Once patients fail the first-line treatment, salvage therapy often fails to effectively control the disease. Resection of the residual mediastinal mass does not appear to achieve long-term control in those who have extrathoracic metastases following conventional first-line systemic therapy. We report a case where a young man presented with symptomatic brain metastases as well as extensive visceral involvement of the liver, small intestine, and lungs. He was successfully managed with multimodality treatment including high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell support following standard first-line chemotherapy, resection of mediastinal disease, lung metastasectomy, and stereotactic brain radiation. He has achieved long-term survival.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Primary Mediastinal Germ Cell Tumors: A Single-Center Experience

Purpose: Primary mediastinal germ cell tumors (PMGCTs) are rare. The natural history and optimal treatment strategies still need to be defined. The aim of the study was to summarize the clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, and prognostic factors of PMGCTs.

Methods: Twenty-four patients with PMGCTs who were treated from December 2008 to January 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate factors associated with prognosis.

Results: The study population consisted of 23 male patients and 1 female patient. Five patients were diagnosed with seminoma and 19 patients were diagnosed with nonseminoma. The median follow-up time for all patients was 15.8 (3.9–114.5) months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) rates for all patients were 65.2 and 44.3%. For nonseminoma and seminoma, the 5-year OS rates were 54.1 and 100% (P = 0.093), respectively, and the 5-year PFS rates were 28.7 and 100%, respectively (P = 0.044). In patients with nonseminoma, first-line radiotherapy indicated superior OS and PFS (P = 0.037 and 0.027, respectively). The median survival time after recurrence was 4.3 months and the 1-year survival rate after recurrence was 23.4%.

Conclusion: These results indicated that in PMGCTs, the prognosis of seminoma is superior to that of nonseminoma. Radiotherapy may be an essential treatment in patients with nonseminoma. Patients with relapse have unfavorable prognosis.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in primary mediastinal germ cell tumors: A retrospective analysis of >20 years single institution experience

OBJECTIVES

To obtain information on outcome stratified by histology, extent and primary treatment patients' data with primary malignant mediastinal germ cell tumors treated between 1998 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.

METHODS

The primary treatment for localized malignant mediastinal germ cell tumors was neoadjuvant bleomycin + etoposid + cisplatin (BEP) ± surgery (n = 22); or surgery ± adjuvant BEP (n = 16). For disseminated disease (n = 21) first line BEP ± second line chemotherapy were administered. For nonseminomas (NS) the NLR at start of BEP was analyzed in relation to disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

After neoadjuvant treatment the 5-year DFS was 100% for seminomas (S), and 63.4% for NS. The 5-year OS was 100% for S, and 76.9% for NS. The 5-year DFS and OS after surgery ± BEP for S was 72.9% and 100%, for NS was 75% and 87.5%, respectively. The 5-year PFS and OS of metastatic patients for S was 60% and 80%, while the median PFS and OS of NS were 5.7 and 11.1 months, respectively. Objective response (P = 0.006) and low NLR (P = 0.043) were independent prognostic markers of longer OS.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed the good outcome of BEP-treated S, while NS had poorer prognosis. Previously published prognostic models for NS were validated. Based on NLR and response a new prognostic model was developed.

ESMO Consensus Conference on testicular germ cell cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) consensus conference on testicular cancer was held on 3-5 November 2016 in Paris, France. The conference included a multidisciplinary panel of 36 leading experts in the diagnosis and treatment of testicular cancer (34 panel members attended the conference; an additional two panel members [CB and K-PD] participated in all preparatory work and subsequent manuscript development). The aim of the conference was to develop detailed recommendations on topics relating to testicular cancer that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) and where the available level of evidence is insufficient. The main topics identified for discussion related to: (1) diagnostic work-up and patient assessment; (2) stage I disease; (3) stage II-III disease; (4) post-chemotherapy surgery, salvage chemotherapy, salvage and desperation surgery and special topics; and (5) survivorship and follow-up schemes. The experts addressed questions relating to one of the five topics within five working groups. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel. A consensus vote was obtained following whole-panel discussions, and the consensus recommendations were then further developed in post-meeting discussions in written form. This manuscript presents the results of the expert panel discussions, including the consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation. All participants approved the final manuscript.

Resection of a Giant Mediastinal Teratoma

This case report describes the surgical management of a giant mediastinal teratoma. Perioperative considerations and operative approach to effect good outcomes are described.