1
|
Tang QH, Chen J, Long Z, Wang YL, Su XA, Qiu JY, Lin QN, Zhang JF, Qin X. Factors affecting distal false lumen enlargement after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection. Heliyon 2023; 9:e17248. [PMID: 37383200 PMCID: PMC10293708 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the factors influencing distal false lumen enlargement after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection. Materials and methods Data were collected on patients with type B aortic dissection who underwent TEVAR from January 2008 to August 2022. Patients were divided into a distal aortic segmental enlargement (DSAE) group and a non-DSAE group based on whether the distal false lumen was dilated more than 5 mm on computed tomographic angiography (CTA) images. To analyze the independent influences on distal false lumen dilatation after TEVAR, the variables with a P value < 0.05 during univariate analysis were included in the binary logistic regression analysis model. Results A total of 335 patients were included in this study, with 85 in the DSAE group and 250 in the non-DSAE group. The mean age was 52.40 ± 11.34 years, 289 (86.27%) were male patients, and the median follow-up time was 6.41 (11.99-29.99) months. There were significant differences in Marfan syndrome, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and follow-up time between the two groups. In terms of morphology, there were statistically significant differences in the number of tears, the size of the primary tear, and the length of dissection between the two groups. Binary logistic regression analysis indicated that Marfan syndrome, COPD, and the primary tear size were associated with distal false lumen dilatation. Conclusions Marfan syndrome, COPD, and the primary tear size influence distal aortic segmental enlargement after TEVAR in type B aortic dissection patients.
Collapse
|
2
|
Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh S, Halloum N, Scali S, Kriege M, Abualia M, Stamenovic D, Bashar Izzat M, Bohan P, Kloeckner R, Oezkur M, Dorweiler B, Treede H, El Beyrouti H. A systematic review and meta-analysis of retrograde type A aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with type B aortic dissection. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e32944. [PMID: 37058052 PMCID: PMC10101253 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000032944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Retrograde type A dissection (RTAD) is a devastating complication of thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) with low incidence but high mortality. The objective of this study is to report the incidence, mortality, potential risk factors, clinical manifestation and diagnostic modalities, and medical and surgical treatments. METHODS A systematic review and single-arm and two-arm meta-analyses evaluated all published reports of RTAD post-TEVAR through January 2021. All study types were included, except study protocols and animal studies, without time restrictions. Outcomes of interest were procedural data (implanted stent-grafts type, and proximal stent-graft oversizing), the incidence of RTAD, associated mortality rate, clinical manifestations, diagnostic workouts and therapeutic management. RESULTS RTAD occurred in 285 out of 10,600 patients: an estimated RTAD incidence of 2.3% (95% CI: 1.9-2.8); incidence of early RTAD was approximately 1.8 times higher than late. Wilcoxon signed-rank testing showed that the proportion of RTAD patients with acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) was significantly higher than those with chronic TBAD (P = .008). Pooled meta-analysis showed that the incidence of RTAD with proximal bare stent TEVAR was 2.1-fold higher than with non-bare stents: risk ratio was 1.55 (95% CI: 0.87-2.75; P = .13). Single arm meta-analysis estimated a mortality rate of 42.2% (95% CI: 32.5-51.8), with an I2 heterogeneity of 70.11% (P < .001). CONCLUSION RTAD is rare after TEVAR but with high mortality, especially in the first month post-TEVAR with acute TBAD patients at greater risk as well as those treated with proximal bare stent endografts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadeq Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz), Mainz, Germany
| | - Nancy Halloum
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz), Mainz, Germany
| | - Salvatore Scali
- Division Vascular Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL
| | - Marc Kriege
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Mohannad Abualia
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz), Mainz, Germany
| | - Davor Stamenovic
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Academic Thoracic Center Mainz, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | - Roman Kloeckner
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Mehmet Oezkur
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz), Mainz, Germany
| | - Bernhard Dorweiler
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Koln, Germany
| | - Hendrik Treede
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz), Mainz, Germany
| | - Hazem El Beyrouti
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz), Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oberhuber A, Raddatz A, Betge S, Ploenes C, Ito W, Janosi RA, Ott C, Langheim E, Czerny M, Puls R, Maßmann A, Zeyer K, Schelzig H. Interdisciplinary German clinical practice guidelines on the management of type B aortic dissection. GEFASSCHIRURGIE 2023; 28:1-28. [PMCID: PMC10123596 DOI: 10.1007/s00772-023-00995-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A. Oberhuber
- German Society of Vascular Surgery and Vascular Medicine (DGG); Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - A. Raddatz
- German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI); Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany
| | - S. Betge
- German Society of Angiology and Vascular Medicine (DGG); Department of Internal Medicine and Angiology, Helios Hospital Salzgitter, Salzgitter, Germany
| | - C. Ploenes
- German Society of Geriatrics (DGG); Department of Angiology, Schön Klinik Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - W. Ito
- German Society of Internal Medicine (GSIM) (DGIM); cardiovascular center Oberallgäu Kempten, Hospital Kempten, Kempten, Germany
| | - R. A. Janosi
- German Cardiac Society (DGK); Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - C. Ott
- German Society of Nephrology (DGfN); Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Paracelsus Medical University, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - E. Langheim
- German Society of prevention and rehabilitation of cardiovascular diseaese (DGPR), Reha Center Seehof, Teltow, Germany
| | - M. Czerny
- German Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (DGTHG), Department University Heart Center Freiburg – Bad Krozingen, Freiburg, Germany
- Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - R. Puls
- German Radiologic Society (DRG); Institute of Diagnostic an Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
| | - A. Maßmann
- German Society of Interventional Radiology (DeGIR); Department of Diagnostic an Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany
| | - K. Zeyer
- Marfanhilfe e. V., Weiden, Germany
| | - H. Schelzig
- German Society of Surgery (DGCH); Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gao HQ, Li G, Zhang HK, Zhang LL, Xu SD. A retrospective study of thoracic endovascular aortic repair timing in patients with uncomplicated type B dissection who have a smoking history. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:1035971. [PMID: 36505364 PMCID: PMC9726749 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1035971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To determine the optimal timing of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for patients with uncomplicated type B dissections who have a smoking history. Methods Data from 308 consecutive patients with uncomplicated type B dissections, who have a smoking history and onset-to-TEVAR time within 90 days, were analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups: Acute and subacute phases. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed. Smooth curve fitting and threshold analysis were performed to characterize the relationship between the onset-to-TEVAR time and follow-up deaths. Results There were no significant differences between the two groups. Smooth curve fitting and threshold effect analysis showed that if early TEVAR was performed within 9.4 days from onset, there was better long-term survival and there was no significant difference after 9.4 days. Conclusion By studying the relationship between onset-to-TEVAR time and all-cause mortality, we found that early TEVAR may have a lower all-cause mortality rate during follow-up in uncomplicated type B dissection patients who have a smoking history and within 90 days from onset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui-Qiang Gao
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China,Hui-Qiang Gao,
| | - Guoqi Li
- Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hong-Kai Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Lan-Lin Zhang
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Shang-Dong Xu
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China,*Correspondence: Shang-Dong Xu,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sriram JD, van de Beek I, Johannesma PC, van Werkum MH, van der Wel TJWT, Wessels EM, Gille HJJP, Houweling AC, Postmus PE, Smit HJM. Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome in apparent primary spontaneous pneumothorax patients; results and recommendations for clinical practice. BMC Pulm Med 2022; 22:325. [PMID: 36028846 PMCID: PMC9414409 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-022-02107-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome (BHD) is an inherited disease caused by pathogenic variants in the FLCN gene. One of the characteristics is the increased risk for spontaneous pneumothorax, likely due to the presence of pulmonary cysts mainly distributed under the carina. Due to variable expression and lack of awareness, BHD is likely to be underdiagnosed. We aimed to examine the prevalence of BHD in patients presenting with an apparent primary spontaneous pneumothorax and to evaluate the contribution of chest CT in establishing the diagnosis. Methods Patients who presented with apparent primary spontaneous pneumothorax between 2004 and 2017 in a large Dutch teaching hospital were enrolled in this quantitative cross-sectional study. A questionnaire was sent to eligible patients. Patients who completed the questionnaire and consented to further participation were invited to visit the hospital for genetic testing and low dose, volumetric chest CT. Results Genetic testing was performed in 88 patients with apparent primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Three patients were found to have a pathogenic variant in the FLCN gene (3.4%). No variants of unknown significance were detected. Pulmonary cysts were detected in 14 out of 83 participants with an available chest CT, six had more than one cyst. All three patients with BHD had multiple pulmonary cysts. Conclusions Based on previous literature and the present study, we believe that performing a chest CT in every patient presenting with primary spontaneous pneumothorax is justified. Subsequent genetic testing of the FLCN gene should be considered when multiple pulmonary cysts are present. Trial registration The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov with reference NCT02916992. Summary at a glance Three out of 88 patients with an apparent primary spontaneous pneumothorax were diagnosed with Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome in this study and all three had multiple pulmonary cysts. We believe that performing a chest CT in every patient with an apparent primary spontaneous pneumothorax is justified to identify underlying diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jincey D Sriram
- Department of Pulmonology, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| | - Irma van de Beek
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul C Johannesma
- Department of Pulmonology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Ziekenhuis, Willy Brandtlaan 10, 6716 RP, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel H van Werkum
- Department of Radiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Tijmen J W T van der Wel
- Department of Pulmonology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elise M Wessels
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans J J P Gille
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan C Houweling
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter E Postmus
- Department of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Hans J M Smit
- Department of Pulmonology, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jubouri M, Al-Tawil M, Yip HCA, Bashir A, Tan SZCP, Bashir M, Anderson R, Bailey D, Nienaber CA, Coselli JS, Williams I. Mid- and long-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in acute and subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection. J Card Surg 2022; 37:1328-1339. [PMID: 35191082 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (un-TBAD) has been managed conservatively with medical therapy to control the heart rate and blood pressure to limit disease progression, in addition to radiological follow-up. However, several trials and observational studies have investigated the use of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in un-TBAD and suggested that TEVAR provides a survival benefit over medical therapy. Outcomes of TEVAR have also been linked with the timing of intervention. AIMS The scope of this review is to collate and summarize all the evidence in the literature on the mid- and long-term outcomes of TEVAR in un-TBAD, confirming its superiority. We also aimed to investigate the relationship between the timing of TEVAR intervention and results. METHODS We carried out a comprehensive literature search on multiple electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE to collate and summarize all research evidence on the mid- and long-term outcomes of TEVAR in un-TBAD, as well as its relationship with intervention timing. RESULTS TEVAR has proven to be a safe and effective tool in un-TBAD, offering superior mid- and long-term outcomes including all-cause and aorta-related mortality, aortic-specific adverse events, aortic remodeling, and need for reintervention. Additionally, performing TEVAR during the subacute phase of dissection seems to yield optimal results. CONCLUSION The evidence demonstrating a survival advantage in favor TEVAR over medical therapy in un-TBAD means that with further research, particular trials and observational studies, TEVAR could become the gold-standard treatment option for un-TBAD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matti Jubouri
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | - Ali Bashir
- Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Sven Z C P Tan
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Mohamad Bashir
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Velindre University NHS Trust, Health Education & Improvement Wales (HEIW), Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Richard Anderson
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Damian Bailey
- Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, Wales, UK
| | - Christoph A Nienaber
- Cardiology and Aortic Centre, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Joseph S Coselli
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, CHI St Luke's-Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ian Williams
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Qiao Z, Chen S, Guo R, Zhong Y, Ge Y, Li C, Liu Y, Zhu J, Sun L. Comparison of Open Repair vs. the One-Stage Hybrid Extra-Anatomic Technique for Distal Aortic Arch Disease Treatment: Mid-term Outcomes With a Risk-Adjusted Analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8:725902. [PMID: 34504880 PMCID: PMC8421766 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.725902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to compare the short- and mid-term outcomes of the stented elephant trunk (SET) procedure combined with supra-arch branch reconstruction and one-stage hybrid arch repair combined thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with extra-anatomic bypass in the management of distal arch disease. Methods: From January 2009 to January 2019, 97 patients underwent one-stage hybrid arch repair combined with TEVAR with extra-anatomic bypass (HAR group), and 206 patients underwent the SET procedure with supra-arch branch reconstruction (SET group). We used inverse-probability-of treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust baseline differences. Results: Before IPTW adjustment, there was no significant difference in operative mortality between the two groups (5.2 vs. 1.0%, P = 0.064). The incidences of stroke, spinal cord injury (SCI), acute kidney injury (AKI), and endoleak also showed no significant differences (4.1 vs. 0.5%, P = 0.066; 2.1 vs. 1.5%, P = 1.000; 0 vs. 1.0%, P = 0.831; 6.2 vs. 1.9%, P = 0.113, respectively). After IPTW adjustment, the incidences of stroke, SCI, and AKI showed no significant differences between the two groups (1.8 vs. 1.1%, P = 0.138; 0.8 vs. 1.6%, P = 0.448; and 0 vs. 0.7%, P = 0.148, respectively). However, the HAR group tended to have higher operative mortality and incidence of endoleak than the SET group (12.4 vs. 1.3%, P = 0.01; 9.9 vs. 1.8%, P = 0.031, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, open repair decreased the risks of endoleak (odds ratio [OR], 0.171, 95% CI, 0.060–0.401; P < 0.001) and operative mortality (OR, 0.093, 95% CI, 0.027–0.238; P < 0.001). The overall survival and event-free survival of the HAR group were significantly lower than those of the SET group (P < 0.001). Conclusion: One-stage hybrid arch repair combined TEVAR with extra-anatomic bypass and the SET procedure with supra-arch branch reconstruction both provided good postoperative treatment outcomes for distal arch disease. However, hybrid arch repair increased the risks of endoleak and operative mortality. The SET procedure provided better mid-term survival than hybrid arch repair without increasing operative mortality. Carefully selecting the indications for the procedure, while receiving close long-term follow-up, may improve the survival rate of patients undergoing hybrid arch repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyu Qiao
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Suwei Chen
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Rutao Guo
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Yongliang Zhong
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Yipeng Ge
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Chengnan Li
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Yongmin Liu
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Junming Zhu
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Lizhong Sun
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Howard C, Sheridan J, Picca L, Reza S, Smith T, Ponnapalli A, Calow R, Cross O, Iddawela S, George M, Livra Dias D, Srinivasan A, Munir W, Bashir M, Idhrees M. TEVAR for complicated and uncomplicated type B aortic dissection-Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Surg 2021; 36:3820-3830. [PMID: 34310731 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.15827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Type B aortic dissection (TBAD), is defined as a dissection involving the aorta distal to left subclavian artery with the ascending aorta and the aortic arch not affected. TBAD is classified due to the time frame and presence of complications. Complicated TBAD (co-TBAD) patients have a greater mortality rate than uncomplicated TBAD (un-TBAD) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is considered the gold-standard intervention for these clinical challenges. METHODS We undertook a systematic review of the literature regarding TEVAR intervention in co-TBAD and un-TBAD. A comprehensive search was undertaken across four major databases and was evaluated and assessed until June 2020. RESULTS A total of 16,104 patients were included in the study (7772 patients co-TBAD and 8352 un-TBAD). A significantly higher proportion of comorbidities were seen in co-TBAD patients compared with un-TBAD. Acute dissection was more frequent in the co-TBAD group (73.55% vs. 66.91%), while chronic dissection was more common in un-TBAD patients (33.8% vs. 70.73%). Postprocedure stroke was higher in co-TBAD (5.85% vs. 3.92%; p < .01), while postprocedural renal failure was higher in un-TBAD patients (7.23 vs. 11.38%; p < .01). No difference was observed in in-hospital mortality however the 30 days mortality was higher in the co-TBAD group. One-year survival was higher in the uncomplicated group but this difference was not observed in the 5-year survival. CONCLUSION In our analysis we can appreciate that despite significantly higher comorbidities in the co-TBAD cohort, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups and the 5-year survival did not have any difference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Callum Howard
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jonathan Sheridan
- Academic Unit of Medical Education, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Leonardo Picca
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Sihab Reza
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Tristan Smith
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Anuradha Ponnapalli
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rachel Calow
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Olivia Cross
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Sashini Iddawela
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Melvin George
- Clinical Pharmacology, SRM Medical College Hospital, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Deidre Livra Dias
- Senior Medical Reviewer, Cognizant Technology Solutions, Pune, India
| | - Anand Srinivasan
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Wahaj Munir
- Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Mohammad Bashir
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, NHS Wales Health Education and Improvement, Cardiff, UK
| | - Mohammed Idhrees
- Institute of Cardiac and Aortic Disorders (ICAD), SRM Institutes for Medical Science (SIMS Hospital), Vadapalani, Chennai, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Xie E, Yang F, Liu Y, Xue L, Fan R, Xie N, Chen L, Liu J, Luo J. Timing and Outcome of Endovascular Repair for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2021; 61:788-797. [PMID: 33846073 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine the effect of intervention timing, from symptom onset to thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), on early and late outcomes in high risk patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD). METHODS The study retrospectively evaluated 267 uTBAD patients with high risk radiographic features who underwent pre-emptive TEVAR during the acute and subacute periods. Demographics, comorbidities, pre-operative imaging features, peri-procedural details, and follow up outcomes were analysed. RESULTS Among the 267 pre-emptive TEVARs for high risk uTBAD, 130 were performed in the acute phase (1-14 days); and 137 in the subacute phase (15-90 days), from initial presentation. The mean age was 55.9 ± 11.0 years and 222 (83.1%) were men. The 30 day mortality rate in the acute group was five times higher than that in the subacute group (3.8% vs. 0.7%), although without statistically significant difference (p = .11). No statistically significant difference in 30 day outcomes (aortic rupture, retrograde type A dissection [RTAD], immediate type Ia endoleak, stroke, spinal cord ischaemia, and re-intervention) was noted (p > .05 for each). Of note, aortic rupture, RTAD, and disabling stroke were observed only in the acute group. Multivariable logistic analyses showed that intervention timing was not associated with 30 day outcomes. The median clinical follow up was 48.2 ± 25.9 months (range 1 - 106 months). There were no significant differences in all cause mortality, dissection related death, late intervention, or aortic related late events among timing cohorts (p > .05 for each). Furthermore, aortic remodelling, by analysing the flow status of the false lumen and evaluation of aortic diameters, either at the thoracic aorta level or the abdominal aorta level, was similar between the two groups. Multivariable Cox analyses showed that intervention timing was not associated with late outcomes. CONCLUSION The present study indicates that TEVAR for high risk uTBAD in the acute phase was associated with a trend toward higher rates of early complications, while the long term outcomes were comparable with those of the subacute phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enmin Xie
- Department of Cardiology, Vascular Centre, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China; The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Fan Yang
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuan Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Vascular Centre, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ling Xue
- Department of Cardiology, Vascular Centre, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ruixin Fan
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Nianjin Xie
- Department of Cardiology, Vascular Centre, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Lyufan Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Vascular Centre, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jitao Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Vascular Centre, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianfang Luo
- Department of Cardiology, Vascular Centre, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China; The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ren C, Wang S, Sun L, Xu S, Lai Y. Analysis of clinical outcomes of one-staged hybrid procedure without thoracotomy for aorta lesion involving distal aortic arch. J Card Surg 2021; 36:1313-1319. [PMID: 33522664 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.15391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of one-staged hybrid procedure for aortic lesions involving the distal aortic arch. METHODS We retrospectively studied 99 consecutive patients who underwent the hybrid procedure (thoracic endovascular aortic repair combined with supra-arch branch vessel bypass) in our center between April 2009 and January 2020 for lesions involving the distal aortic arch. RESULTS Median age was 64.0 (57.0-69.0) years, and 83 (83.8%) patients were male. There were five deaths in the perioperative period (three due to cerebral infarction and two due to intimal rupture). During the median follow-up of 41.0 months, 20 patients died, three had endoleak, one had a newly formed intimal tear, and two had femoral artery pseudoaneurysm. The 5- and 10-year survival rates of the total population were 72.2% and 48.8%, respectively. Additionally, there was no difference in the 5-year survival rate among the four groups according to different pathologies (Type B aortic dissection, aortic ulcer, aortic aneurysm, aortic pseudoaneurysm: 74.7%, 78.2%, 61.1%, and 75.5%, respectively, p = .58). Furthermore, there was no difference in the 5- and 10-year survival rates between the two groups according to the different bypass methods (right axillary artery [RAA]-left axillary artery [LAA] vs. RAA-LAA-left common carotid artery: 74.1% vs. 68.9%, p = .38). CONCLUSIONS Although one-staged hybrid procedure has fewer complications in high-risk patients with lesions involving the distal aortic arch, the long-term survival rate is not optimistic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Changwei Ren
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung, and Blood Vascular Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Shengwei Wang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung, and Blood Vascular Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Lizhong Sun
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung, and Blood Vascular Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Shangdong Xu
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung, and Blood Vascular Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yongqiang Lai
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung, and Blood Vascular Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Meisenbacher K, Böckler D, Geisbüsch P, Hank T, Bischoff MS. Preliminary results of spot-stent grafting in Stanford type B aortic dissection and intramural haematoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 58:932-939. [DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
Optimal treatment for patients with diseased proximal landing zones in acute/subacute Stanford type B dissection and intramural haematoma remains unclear. This study describes the preliminary outcomes of a localized endovascular treatment [spot-stent grafting (SSG)] of main entries/intramural blood pooling located downstream (aortic zones 4 and 5) using one single short device comprising diseased landing zones, looking particularly at the technical and morphological outcomes.
METHODS
Patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for acute/subacute aortic dissection Stanford type B/intramural haematoma Stanford type B between 1997 and 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database. In a total of 183 cases, 22 patients (7 women; median age 62 years; range 35–79 years) received SSG. The primary study end point was technical success. The primary morphological end point was false lumen thrombosis/aortic remodelling. Secondary end points were TEVAR-related mortality/morbidity and reinterventions. The median follow-up was 28.5 months (5 days–15.6 years).
RESULTS
The primary technical success rate was 100% (22/22). During follow-up, false lumen thrombosis was seen in 21 patients (95.5%) at a median of 6 days (0 days to 2.7 years) after the index procedure (limited/extended false lumen thrombosis: n = 9 vs 12). Aortic remodelling was achieved in 15 of 22 patients (68.2%) at a median of 360 days (3 days to 7.2 years). Limited/extended remodelling was observed in 8/15 and 7/15, respectively. Retrograde dissection or stent graft-induced new entry was not observed. No stroke or spinal cord injury occurred. Reinterventions were performed in 4/22 cases. The in-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality were 0%. Overall mortality during the follow-up period was 22.7% (5/22).
CONCLUSIONS
This study shows favourable technical and morphological results for SSG in selected patients with acute/subacute aortic dissection Stanford type B/intramural haematoma Stanford type B. Patient allocation to SSG remains individual. Prospective large-scale long-term data may allow refinement of the application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrin Meisenbacher
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dittmar Böckler
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Geisbüsch
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Hank
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shah A, Gupta N, Gewertz BL, Azizzadeh A. TEVAR for high risk patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a paradigm shift. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY 2020. [DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4777.20.01450-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|