Effects produced by the facemask with and without skeletal anchorage for the orthopaedic treatment of Class III malocclusion in growing patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs

Class III malocclusion treated with a 3D-printed hybrid hyrax distalizer combined with mentoplate using Alt-RAMEC protocol: A case report

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this report was to assess the skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes in a juvenile patient with a severe class III malocclusion. This case report describes a novel method of class III treatment using skeletal anchorage for maxillary protraction and Alt-RAMEC protocol.

PATIENT CONCERNS

The patient did not have any subjective complaints before treatment and there was no family history of class III malocclusion.

CLINICAL FINDINGS AND PRIMARY DIAGNOSES

Extra-orally, the patient had a concave profile with a retrusive mid-face and prominent lower lip. The intra-oral examination revealed angle class III malocclusion with a -3-mm overjet. There was no anterior displacement on closure when the patient was assessed clinically. According to the cephalometric analysis, the sagittal jaw relation and Wits appraisal were reduced due to a retrognathic maxilla and prognathic mandible.

INTERVENTIONS

The treatment plan involved maxillary protraction, Alt-RAMEC protocol for 10 weeks and upper molar distalisation with a hybrid hyrax distalizer in combination with a mentoplate. The active treatment time was estimated to 18 months followed by 6 months retention with the appliance.

OUTCOMES

The sagittal jaw relationship was increased by approximately 9°, mainly due to maxillary advancement of 8 mm and a positional change of the mandible anteroposteriorly. Natural decompensation of the lower incisors was also observed. In addition, both the facial profile and the smile became more harmonious after treatment. The treatment analysis revealed that the changes achieved were mainly skeletal and it was possible to avoid adverse effects on the dentition.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, treatment with a hybrid hyrax distalizer combined with mentoplate using the Alt-RAMEC protocol is effective in correcting the anteroposterior discrepancy in a juvenile class III patient and it is possible to achieve maxillary advancement of 8 mm.

Long-term effects produced by early treatment of Class III malocclusion with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask followed by fixed appliances: A multicentre retro-prospective controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the short- and long-term dentoskeletal effects of early Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask (RME/FM) followed by fixed appliances.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 44 patients (27 females, 17 males) treated consecutively with RME/FM were included from the archives of 3 centres. Three lateral cephalograms were available: T0 (before the start of RME/FM therapy, mean age 8.1 ± 1.8 years), T1 (immediately after RME/FM, mean age 9.8 ± 1.6 years), and T2 (long-term observation, mean age 19.5 ± 1.6 years). A control group of 17 untreated Class III subjects (12 females and 5 males) also was selected. Between-group statistical comparisons were performed with ANCOVA.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences for any of the cephalometric variables were found at T0. In the short term, the treated group showed significant improvements in ANB (+2.9°), Wits appraisal (+2.7 mm), SNA (+1.8°) and SNB (-1.1°). A significant closure of CoGoMe angle (-1.3°) associated with smaller increments along Co-Gn (-2.4 mm) also was found together with a significant increase in intermaxillary divergence (+1.3°). In the long-term, significant improvements in ANB (+2.6°), Wits appraisal (+2.7 mm) and SNB (-1.7°) were recorded together with a significant closure of the CoGoMe angle (-2.9°). No significant long-term changes in vertical skeletal relationships were found.

CONCLUSIONS

RME/FM therapy was effective in improving Class III dentoskeletal relationships in the short term. These changes remained stable in the long-term due mainly to favourable mandibular changes.

Impact of digital orthodontics on maxillary protraction with implants in children with skeletal class III: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

The objective of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of digital orthodontics in utilizing implants for maxillary protraction as a treatment for skeletal class III malocclusion in children.

Materials and Methods

The study was registered with PROSPERO with the number CRD42023407406 on 23/03/2023. We conducted an extensive comprehensive literature search in nine electronic databases, including PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, Cochrane databases, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and the Web of Sciences databases. The studies were evaluated for their methodology, the intervention technology used, the outcomes, and their quality. Publication bias assessment was conducted using the Jadad scale and the ROBINS-I assessment tool.

Results

We included a total of 17 studies that comprised a total of 376 patients in this analysis. The number of patients and participants fluctuated between 1 and 71, with > 60 % being female. The patients were aged between 1.1 and 19.2 years. We included only nine studies in the meta-analysis, in which we observed a success rate between 71.4 % and 100 % with a 95 % CI of 17.4 ± 2.988 (±17.2 %) [14.412-20.388]. The failure rates, although minimal, ranged from 5.9 % to 28.6 %, with a 95 % CI of 2.3 ± 1.480 (±64.3 %) [0.820-3.780].

Conclusion

The evidence suggests that digital orthodontics is a promising approach for treating children with skeletal class III malocclusion using implants for maxillary protraction. However, further high-quality studies are required for validating our current observations and regulating the stability of treatment outcomes on a long-term basis.

Maxillary Protraction: A Bibliometric Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this analysis was to investigate the historical development, current status, and research hot spots related to maxillary protraction in the treatment of maxillary hypoplasia.

METHODS

The term "TS = maxillary protraction" was used to search for articles in the Web of Science Core Collection at the library of Capital Medical University. The results were analysed using CiteSpace6.2.R1 software, including the examination of annual publication trends and analysis of author, country, institution, and keywords.

RESULTS

A total of 483 papers were included in this study. The annual publications showed an overall increasing trend. The top 5 authors with the most published papers were Lorenzo Franchi, Tiziano Baccetti, Seung-Hak Baek, Paola Cozza, and U Hagg. The top 5 countries with the highest publication counts were the US, Turkey, South Korea, Italy, and China. The top 5 institutions in terms of the number of published papers were the University of Florence, the University of Michigan, Kyung Hee University, Seoul National University, and Gazi University. The top 3 journals with the most citations were the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Angle Orthodontist, and the European Journal of Orthodontics. Furthermore, "Maxillary protraction," "Class III malocclusion," and "Maxillary expansion" were the most common keywords.

CONCLUSIONS

The effective age range for maxillary protraction has been expanded with the introduction of skeletal anchorage and the combination of maxillary expansion and protraction. Skeletal anchorage offers significant advantages over dental anchorage, but there is a need for further research to further substantiate its stability and safety. In recent years, the positive effects of maxillary protraction on the nasopharyngeal area have been well established, but its impact on the oropharyngeal area remains a topic of debate. Therefore, it is crucial to conduct further investigations into the effects of maxillary protraction on the oropharyngeal area and explore the factors that influence different outcomes.

Comparison of treatment effects between two types of facemasks in early Class III patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare the short-term treatment effects between two types of facemasks in skeletal Class III patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 40 skeletal Class III subjects (mean age: 7.7 years) who had been treated with protraction facemasks with forehead straps (PFFS) or Petit type facemasks (PTF). Lateral cephalograms were analyzed at pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2) with an average interval of 9 months.

RESULTS

At T1, PFFS and PTF groups showed similar sagittal, vertical dentoskeletal patterns. From T1 to T2, both groups presented significant forward movement of the maxilla, posterior movement and clockwise rotation of the mandible (all p < .001), labioversion of the maxillary incisors, and linguoversion of the mandibular incisors. They showed increased overjet (p < .001). Although there were no significant differences in the number of changes in most dentoskeletal variables between the two groups, the PFFS group showed more anterior rotation of the palatal plane and backward rotation of the mandible compared to the PTF group, resulting in a significant decrease (-0.42 mm) in overbite (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both PFFS and PTF showed no significant differences in most skeletal and dental changes, except for overbite. These findings might be helpful for clinicians in selecting the types of facemasks for growing Class III malocclusion patients.