Criss-crossed interactions between the enhancer and the att sites of phage Mu during DNA transposition

Transposable Phage Mu

Transposable phage Mu has played a major role in elucidating the mechanism of movement of mobile DNA elements. The high efficiency of Mu transposition has facilitated a detailed biochemical dissection of the reaction mechanism, as well as of protein and DNA elements that regulate transpososome assembly and function. The deduced phosphotransfer mechanism involves in-line orientation of metal ion-activated hydroxyl groups for nucleophilic attack on reactive diester bonds, a mechanism that appears to be used by all transposable elements examined to date. A crystal structure of the Mu transpososome is available. Mu differs from all other transposable elements in encoding unique adaptations that promote its viral lifestyle. These adaptations include multiple DNA (enhancer, SGS) and protein (MuB, HU, IHF) elements that enable efficient Mu end synapsis, efficient target capture, low target specificity, immunity to transposition near or into itself, and efficient mechanisms for recruiting host repair and replication machineries to resolve transposition intermediates. MuB has multiple functions, including target capture and immunity. The SGS element promotes gyrase-mediated Mu end synapsis, and the enhancer, aided by HU and IHF, participates in directing a unique topological architecture of the Mu synapse. The function of these DNA and protein elements is important during both lysogenic and lytic phases. Enhancer properties have been exploited in the design of mini-Mu vectors for genetic engineering. Mu ends assembled into active transpososomes have been delivered directly into bacterial, yeast, and human genomes, where they integrate efficiently, and may prove useful for gene therapy.

Controlling DNA degradation from a distance: a new role for the Mu transposition enhancer

Phage Mu is unique among transposable elements in employing a transposition enhancer. The enhancer DNA segment is the site where the transposase MuA binds and makes bridging interactions with the two Mu ends, interwrapping the ends with the enhancer in a complex topology essential for assembling a catalytically active transpososome. The enhancer is also the site at which regulatory proteins control divergent transcription of genes that determine the phage lysis-lysogeny decision. Here we report a third function for the enhancer - that of regulating degradation of extraneous DNA attached to both ends of infecting Mu. This DNA is protected from nucleases by a phage protein until Mu integrates into the host chromosome, after which it is rapidly degraded. We find that leftward transcription at the enhancer, expected to disrupt its topology within the transpososome, blocks degradation of this DNA. Disruption of the enhancer would lead to the loss or dislocation of two non-catalytic MuA subunits positioned in the transpososome by the enhancer. We provide several lines of support for this inference, and conclude that these subunits are important for activating degradation of the flanking DNA. This work also reveals a role for enhancer topology in phage development.

The μ transpososome structure sheds light on DDE recombinase evolution

Studies of bacteriophage Mu transposition paved the way for understanding retroviral integration and V(D)J recombination as well as many other DNA transposition reactions. Here we report the structure of the Mu transpososome--Mu transposase (MuA) in complex with bacteriophage DNA ends and target DNA--determined from data that extend anisotropically to 5.2 Å, 5.2 Å and 3.7 Å resolution, in conjunction with previously determined structures of individual domains. The highly intertwined structure illustrates why chemical activity depends on formation of the synaptic complex, and reveals that individual domains have different roles when bound to different sites. The structure also provides explanations for the increased stability of the final product complex and for its preferential recognition by the ATP-dependent unfoldase ClpX. Although MuA and many other recombinases share a structurally conserved 'DDE' catalytic domain, comparisons among the limited set of available complex structures indicate that some conserved features, such as catalysis in trans and target DNA bending, arose through convergent evolution because they are important for function.

Interactions of phage Mu enhancer and termini that specify the assembly of a topologically unique interwrapped transpososome

The higher-order DNA-protein complex that carries out the chemical steps of phage Mu transposition is organized by bridging interactions among three DNA sites, the left (L) and right (R) ends of Mu, and an enhancer element (E), mediated by the transposase protein MuA. A subset of the six subunits of MuA associated with their cognate sub-sites at L and R communicate with the enhancer to trigger the stepwise assembly of the functional transpososome. The DNA follows a well-defined path within the transpososome, trapping five supercoil nodes comprising two E-R crossings, one E-L crossing and two L-R crossings. The enhancer is a critical DNA element in specifying the unique interwrapped topology of the three-site LER synapse. In this study, we used multiple strategies to characterize Mu end-enhancer interactions to extend, modify and refine those inferred from earlier analyses. Directed placement of transposase subunits at their cognate sub-sites at L and R, analysis of the protein composition of transpososomes thus obtained, and their characterization using topological methods define the following interactions. R1-E interaction is essential to promote transpososome assembly, R3-E interaction contributes to the native topology of the transpososome, and L1-E and R2-E interactions are not required for assembly. The data on L2-E and L3-E interactions are not unequivocal. If they do occur, either one is sufficient to support the assembly process. Our results are consistent with two R-E and perhaps one L-E, being responsible for the three DNA crossings between the enhancer and the left and right ends of Mu. A 3D representation of the interwrapped complex (IW) obtained by modeling is consistent with these results. The model reveals straightforward geometric and topological relationships between the IW complex and a more relaxed enhancer-independent V-form of the transpososome assembled under altered reaction conditions.

The mu transpososome through a topological lens

Phage Mu is the most efficient transposable element known, its high efficiency being conferred by an enhancer DNA element. Transposition is the end result of a series of well choreographed steps that juxtapose the enhancer and the two Mu ends within a nucleoprotein complex called the 'transpososome.' The particular arrangement of DNA and protein components lends extraordinary stability to the transpososome and regulates the frequency, precision, directionality, and mechanism of transposition. The structure of the transpososome, therefore, holds the key to understanding all of these attributes, and ultimately to explaining the runaway genetic success of transposable elements throughout the biological world. This review focuses on the path of the DNA within the Mu transpososome, as uncovered by recent topological analyses. It discusses why Mu topology cannot be analyzed by standard methods, and how knowledge of the geometry of site alignment during Flp and Cre site-specific recombination was harnessed to design a new methodology called 'difference topology.' This methodology has also revealed the order and dynamics of association of the three interacting DNA sites, as well as the role of the enhancer in assembly of the Mu transpososome.

3D reconstruction of the Mu transposase and the Type 1 transpososome: a structural framework for Mu DNA transposition

Mu DNA transposition proceeds through a series of higher-order nucleoprotein complexes called transpososomes. The structural core of the transpososome is a tetramer of the transposase, Mu A, bound to the two transposon ends. High-resolution structural analysis of the intact transposase and the transpososome has not been successful to date. Here we report the structure of Mu A at 16-angstroms and the Type 1 transpososome at 34-angstroms resolution, by 3D reconstruction of images obtained by scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) at cryo-temperatures. Electron spectroscopic imaging (ESI) of the DNA-phosphorus was performed in conjunction with the structural investigation to derive the path of the DNA through the transpososome and to define the DNA-binding surface in the transposase. Our model of the transpososome fits well with the accumulated biochemical literature for this intricate transposition system, and lays a structural foundation for biochemical function, including catalysis in trans and the complex circuit of macromolecular interactions underlying Mu DNA transposition.

The Mu Transposase Interwraps Distant DNA Sites within a Functional Transpososome in the Absence of DNA Supercoiling

A Mu transpososome assembled on negatively supercoiled DNA traps five supercoils by intertwining the left (L) and right (R) ends of Mu with an enhancer element (E). To investigate the contribution of DNA supercoiling to this elaborate synapse in which E and L cross once, E and R twice, and L and R twice, we have analyzed DNA crossings in a transpososome assembled on nicked substrates under conditions that bypass the supercoiling requirement for transposition. We find that the transposase MuA can recreate an essentially similar topology on nicked substrates, interwrapping both E-R and L-R twice but being unable to generate the single E-L crossing. In addition, we deduce that the functional MuA tetramer must contribute to three of the four observed crossings and, thus, to restraining the enhancer within the complex. We discuss the contribution of both MuA and DNA supercoiling to the 5-noded Mu synapse built at the 3-way junction.

The taming of a transposon: V(D)J recombination and the immune system

The genes that encode immunoglobulins and T-cell receptors must be assembled from the multiple variable (V), joining (J), and sometimes diversity (D) gene segments present in the germline loci. This process of V(D)J recombination is the major source of the immense diversity of the immune repertoire of jawed vertebrates. The recombinase that initiates the process, recombination-activating genes 1 (RAG1) and RAG2, belongs to a large family that includes transposases and retroviral integrases. RAG1/2 cleaves the DNA adjacent to the gene segments to be recombined, and the segments are then joined together by DNA repair factors. A decade of biochemical research on RAG1/2 has revealed many similarities to transposition, culminating with the observation that RAG1/2 can carry out transpositional strand transfer. Here, we discuss the parallels between V(D)J recombination and transposition, focusing specifically on the assembly of the recombination nucleoprotein complex, the mechanism of cleavage, the disassembly of post-cleavage complexes, and aberrant reactions carried out by the recombinase that do not result in successful locus rearrangement and may be deleterious to the organism. This work highlights the considerable diversity of transposition systems and their relation to V(D)J recombination.

A unique right end-enhancer complex precedes synapsis of Mu ends: the enhancer is sequestered within the transpososome throughout transposition

Assembly of the Mu transpososome is dependent on interactions of transposase subunits with the left (L) and right (R) ends of Mu and an enhancer (E). We have followed the order and dynamics of association of these sites within a series of transpososomes prior to and during formation of a three-site complex (LER), engagement of Mu ends by the transposase active site (type 0 complex), cleavage of the ends (type I complex) and their transfer to target DNA (type II complex). LER appears to be preceded by a two-site complex (ER) where E and R are interwrapped twice, as in the mature transpososome. At each stage thereafter, the overall topology of five DNA supercoils is retained: two between E and R, one between E and L and two between L and R. However, L-R interactions within LER appear to be flexible. Unexpectedly, the enhancer was seen to persist within the transpososome through cleavage and strand transfer of Mu ends to target DNA.

The conserved CA/TG motif at Mu termini: T specifies stable transpososome assembly

The dinucleotide CA/TG found at the termini of transposable phage Mu occurs also at the termini of a large class of transposable elements, including HIV, all retroviruses and many retrotransposons. It was shown recently that mutations of this sequence block transpososome assembly, that A/T is more critical for activity than C/G, and that the hierarchy of reactivity of mutant termini follows closely the reported hierarchy of flexibility of their dinucleotide steps. In order to test the hypothesis that the terminal dinucleotide plays an essential structural role during "open termini" formation accompanying assembly, we have examined the activity of substrates carrying 100 different pairs of mismatched termini. Consistent with the flexibility hypothesis, we find that mismatched substrates are extremely efficient at assembly. A wild-type T residue on the bottom strand is essential for stable assembly, but the identity of the dinucleotide on the top strand is irrelevant for transposition chemistry. In addition, we have found a new rule for suppression of terminal defects by MuB protein, as well as a role for metal ions in DNA opening at the termini.

DNA gyrase requirements distinguish the alternate pathways of Mu transposition

The MuA transposase mediates transposition of bacteriophage Mu through two distinct mechanisms. The first integration event following infection occurs through a non-replicative mechanism. In contrast, during lytic growth, multiple rounds of replicative transposition amplify the phage genome. We have examined the influence of gyrase and DNA supercoiling on these two transposition pathways using both a gyrase-inhibiting drug and several distinct gyrase mutants. These experiments reveal that gyrase activity is not essential for integration; both lysogens and recombination intermediates are detected when gyrase is inhibited during Mu infection. In contrast, gyrase inhibition causes severe defects in replicative transposition. In two of the mutants, as well as in drug-treated cells, replicative transposition is almost completely blocked. Experiments probing for formation of MuA-DNA complexes in vivo reveal that this block occurs very early, during assembly of the transposase complex required for the catalytic steps of recombination. The findings establish that DNA structure-based signals are used differently for integrative and replicative transposition. We propose that transposase assembly, the committed step for recombination, has evolved to depend on different DNA /architectural signals to control the reaction outcome during these two distinct phases of the phage life cycle.

The Mu three-site synapse: a strained assembly platform in which delivery of the L1 transposase binding site triggers catalytic commitment

The Mu DNA transposition reaction proceeds through a three-site synaptic complex (LER), including the two Mu ends and the transpositional enhancer. We show that the LER contains highly stressed DNA regions in the enhancer and in the L1 transposase binding site. We propose that the L1 site acts as the keystone for assembly of a catalytically competent transpososome. Delivery of L1 through HU-mediated bending completes LER assembly, provides the trigger for necessary conformational transitions in transpososome formation, and allows target capture to occur. Relief of the stress at L1 and the enhancer may help drive Mu A tetramerization and engagement of the Mu ends by the transposase active site.

Symmetric DNA sites are functionally asymmetric within Flp and Cre site-specific DNA recombination synapses

Flp and Cre-mediated recombination on symmetrized FRT and loxP sites, respectively, in circular plasmid substrates yield both DNA inversion and deletion. However, upon sequestering three negative supercoils outside the recombination complex using the resII-resIII synapse formed by Tn3 resolvase and the LER synapse formed by phage Mu transposase in the case of Flp and Cre, respectively, the reactions are channeled towards inversion at the expense of deletion. The inversion product is a trefoil, its unique topology being conferred by the external resolvase or LER synapse. Thus, Flp and Cre assign their symmetrized substrates a strictly antiparallel orientation with respect to strand cleavage and exchange. These conclusions are supported by the product profiles from tethered parallel and antiparallel native FRT sites in dilution and competition assays. Furthermore, the observed recombination bias favoring deletion over inversion in a nicked circular substrate containing two symmetrized FRT sites is consistent with the predictions from Monte Carlo simulations based on antiparallel synapsis of the DNA partners.

Path of DNA within the Mu transpososome. Transposase interactions bridging two Mu ends and the enhancer trap five DNA supercoils

The phage Mu transpososome is assembled by interactions of transposase subunits with the left (L) and right (R) ends of Mu and an enhancer (E) located in between. A metastable three-site complex LER progresses into a more stable type 0 complex in which a tetrameric transposase is poised for DNA cleavage. "Difference topology" has revealed five trapped negative supercoils within type 0, three contributed by crossings of E with L and R, and two by crossings of L with R. This is the most complex DNA arrangement seen to date within a recombination synapse. Contrary to the prevailing notion, the enhancer appears not to be released immediately following type 0 assembly. Difference topology provides a simple method for determining the ordered sequestration of DNA segments within nucleoprotein assemblies.

Conformational isomerization in phage Mu transpososome assembly: effects of the transpositional enhancer and of MuB

Initiation of phage Mu DNA transposition requires assembly of higher order protein-DNA complexes called Mu transpososomes containing the two Mu DNA ends and MuA transposase tetramer. Mu transpososome assembly is highly regulated and involves multiple DNA sites for transposase binding, including a transpositional enhancer called the internal activation sequence (IAS). In addition, a number of protein cofactors participate, including the target DNA activator MuB ATPase. We investigated the impact of the assembly cofactors on the kinetics of transpososome assembly with the aim of deciphering the reaction steps that are influenced by the cofactors. The transpositional enhancer IAS appears to have little impact on the initial pairing of the two Mu end segments bound by MuA. Instead, it accelerates the post-synaptic conformational step(s) that converts the reversible complex to the stable transpososome. The transpososome assembly stimulation by MuB does not require its stable DNA binding activity, which appears critical for directing transposition to sites distant from the donor transposon.

Effect of mutations in the Mu-host junction region on transpososome assembly

Mu transposition occurs through a series of higher-order nucleoprotein complexes called transpososomes. The region where the Mu DNA joins the host DNA plays an integral role in the assembly of these transpososomes. We have created a series of point mutations at the Mu-host junction and characterized their effect on the Mu in vitro strand transfer reaction. Analysis of these mutant constructs revealed an inhibition in transpososome assembly at the point in the reaction pathway when the junction region is engaged by the transposase active site (i.e. the transition from LER to type 0). We found that the degree of inhibition was dependent upon the particular base-pair change at each position and whether the substitution occurred at the left or right transposon end. The MuB transposition protein, an allosteric effector of MuA, was shown to suppress all of the inhibitory Mu-host junction mutants. Most of the mutant constructs were also suppressed, to varying degrees, by the substitution of Mg(2+) with Mn(2+). Analysis of the mutant constructs has revealed hierarchical nucleotide preferences at positions -1 through +3 for transpososome assembly and suggests the possibility that specific metal ion-DNA base interactions are involved in DNA recognition and transpososome assembly.

The Mu enhancer is functionally asymmetric both in cis and in trans. Topological selectivity of Mu transposition is enhancer-independent

Mu DNA transposition from a negatively supercoiled DNA substrate requires interaction of an enhancer element with the left (attL) and right (attR) ends of Mu. The orientation of the L and R ends with respect to each other (inverted) and with respect to the enhancer is normally inviolate. We show that when the enhancer is provided in trans as a linear fragment, the head to head orientation of the L/R ends is still required. Each functional half of the linear enhancer maintains the same "cross-wise" interaction with the subsites L1 and R1, when present in cis or in trans. In reactions catalyzed by an enhancer-independent variant of the Mu transposase, the need for negative supercoiling of the substrate and the inverted orientation of L and R ends is not relaxed. These results show that the orientation specificity of the enhancer is not determined by its topological linkage to the Mu ends. There is a functional asymmetry inherent to the enhancer. Furthermore, the enhancer does not directly impose topological constraints on the transposition reaction or specify the reactive orientation of the Mu ends.

Domain III function of Mu transposase analysed by directed placement of subunits within the transpososome

Assembly of the functional tetrameric form of Mu transposase (MuA protein) at the two att ends of Mu depends on interaction of MuA with multiple att and enhancer sites on supercoiled DNA, and is stimulated by MuB protein. The N-terminal domain I of MuA harbours distinct regions for interaction with the att ends and enhancer; the C-terminal domain III contains separate regions essential for tetramer assembly and interaction with MuB protein (IIIalpha and IIIbeta, respectively). Although the central domain II (the 'DDE' domain) of MuA harbours the known catalytic DDE residues, a 26 amino acid peptide within IIIalpha also has a non-specific DNA binding and nuclease activity which has been implicated in catalysis. One model proposes that active sites for Mu transposition are assembled by sharing structural/catalytic residues between domains II and III present on separate MuA monomers within the MuA tetramer. We have used substrates with altered att sites and mixtures of MuA proteins with either wild-type or altered att DNA binding specificities, to create tetrameric arrangements wherein specific MuA subunits are nonfunctional in II, IIIalpha or IIIbeta domains. From the ability of these oriented tetramers to carry out DNA cleavage and strand transfer we conclude that domain IIIalpha or IIIbeta function is not unique to a specific subunit within the tetramer, indicative of a structural rather than a catalytic function for domain III in Mu transposition.