Non-templated addition of nucleotides to the 3' end of nascent RNA during RNA editing in Physarum

Genetic Diversity in the mtDNA of Physarum polycephalum

The mtDNA of the myxomycete Physarum polycephalum can contain as many as 81 genes. These genes can be grouped in three different categories. The first category includes 46 genes that are classically found on the mtDNA of many organisms. However, 43 of these genes are cryptogenes that require a unique type of RNA editing (MICOTREM). A second category of gene is putative protein-coding genes represented by 26 significant open reading frames. However, these genes do not appear to be transcribed during the growth of the plasmodium and are currently unassigned since they do not have any apparent similarity to other classical mitochondrial protein-coding genes. The third category of gene is found in the mtDNA of some strains of P. polycephalum. These genes derive from a linear mitochondrial plasmid with nine significant, but unassigned, open reading frames which can integrate into the mitochondrial DNA by recombination. Here, we review the mechanism and evolution of the RNA editing necessary for cryptogene expression, discuss possible origins for the 26 unassigned open reading frames based on tentative identification of their protein product, and discuss the implications to mtDNA structure and replication of the integration of the linear mitochondrial plasmid.

Perfection of eccentricity: Mitochondrial genomes of diplonemids

Mitochondria are the sandbox of evolution as exemplified most particularly by the diplonemids, a group of marine microeukaryotes. These protists are uniquely characterized by their highly multipartite mitochondrial genome and systematically fragmented genes whose pieces are spread out over several dozens of chromosomes. The type species Diplonema papillatum was the first member of this group in which the expression of fragmented mitochondrial genes was investigated experimentally. We now know that gene expression involves separate transcription of gene pieces (modules), RNA editing of module transcripts, and module joining to mature mRNAs and rRNAs. The mechanism of cognate module recognition and ligation is distinct from known intron splicing and remains to be uncovered. Here, we review the current status of research on mitochondrial genome architecture, as well as gene complement, structure, and expression modes in diplonemids. Further, we discuss the potential molecular mechanisms of posttranscriptional processing, and finally reflect on the evolutionary trajectories and trends of mtDNA evolution as seen in this protist group. © 2018 IUBMB Life, 70(12):1197-1206, 2018.

A specific, promoter-independent activity of T7 RNA polymerase suggests a general model for DNA/RNA editing in single subunit RNA Polymerases

Insertional RNA editing has been observed and characterized in mitochondria of myxomycetes. The single subunit mitochondrial RNA polymerase adds nontemplated nucleotides co-transcriptionally to produce functional tRNA, rRNA and mRNAs with full genetic information. Addition of nontemplated nucleotides to the 3′ ends of RNAs have been observed in polymerases related to the mitochondrial RNA polymerase. This activity has been observed with T7 RNA polymerase (T7 RNAP), the well characterized prototype of the single subunit polymerases, as a nonspecific addition of nucleotides to the 3′ end of T7 RNAP transcripts in vitro. Here we show that this novel activity is an editing activity that can add specific ribonucleotides to 3′ ends of RNA or DNA when oligonucleotides, able to form intramolecular or intermolecular hairpin loops with recessed 3′ ends, are added to T7 RNA polymerase in the presence of at least one ribonucleotide triphosphate. Specific ribonucleotides are added to the recessed 3′ ends through Watson-Crick base pairing with the non-base paired nucleotide adjacent to the 3′ end. Optimization of this activity is obtained through alteration of the lengths of the 5′-extension, hairpin loop, and hairpin duplex. These properties define a T7 RNAP activity different from either transcriptional elongation or initiation.

Mitochondrial Genome Evolution and a Novel RNA Editing System in Deep-Branching Heteroloboseids

Discoba (Excavata) is an evolutionarily important group of eukaryotes that includes Jakobida, with the most bacterial-like mitochondrial genomes known, and Euglenozoa, many of which have extensively fragmented mitochondrial genomes. However, little is known about the mitochondrial genomes of Heterolobosea, the third main group of Discoba. Here, we studied two heteroloboseids—an undescribed amoeba “BB2” and Pharyngomonas kirbyi. Phylogenomic analysis revealed that they form a clade that is a sister group to all other Heterolobosea. We characterized the mitochondrial genomes of BB2 and P. kirbyi, which encoded 44 and 48 putative protein-coding genes respectively. Their gene contents were similar to that of Naegleria. In BB2, mitochondrially encoded RNAs were heavily edited, with ∼500 mononucleotide insertion events, mostly guanosines. These insertions always have the same identity as an adjacent nucleotide. Editing occurs in all ribosomal RNAs and protein-coding transcripts except one, and half of the transfer RNAs. Analysis of Illumina deep-sequencing data suggested that this RNA editing is very accurate and efficient, and most likely co-transcriptional. The dissimilarity of this editing process to other RNA editing phenomena in discobids, as well as its apparent absence in P. kirbyi, suggest that this remarkably extensive system of insertional editing evolved independently in the BB2 lineage, after its divergence from the P. kirbyi lineage.

Electroporation of DNA into Physarum polycephalum Mitochondria: Effects on Transcription and RNA Editing in Isolated Organelles

Mitochondrial RNAs in the acellular slime mold Physarum polycephalum contain nucleotides that are not encoded in the mitochondrial genes from which they are transcribed. These site-specific changes are quite extensive, comprising ~4% of the residues within mRNAs and ~2% of rRNAs and tRNAs. These “extra” nucleotides are added co-transcriptionally, but the means by which this is accomplished have not been elucidated. The cox1 mRNA also contains four sites of C to U changes, which occur post-transcriptionally, most likely via targeted deamination. The currently available in vitro systems for studying P. polycephalum editing are limited in that the template is the entire ~63,000 bp mitochondrial genome. This presents a significant challenge when trying to define the signals that specify editing sites. In an attempt to overcome this issue, a method for introducing DNA into isolated P. polycephalum mitochondria via electroporation has been developed. Exogenous DNA is expressed, but the transcripts synthesized from these templates are not edited under the conditions tested. However, transcripts derived from the mitochondrial genome are accurately edited after electroporation, indicating that the editing machinery is still functional. These findings suggest that this method may ultimately provide a feasible approach to elucidating editing signals.

Novel modes of RNA editing in mitochondria

Gene structure and expression in diplonemid mitochondria are unparalleled. Genes are fragmented in pieces (modules) that are separately transcribed, followed by the joining of module transcripts to contiguous RNAs. Some instances of unique uridine insertion RNA editing at module boundaries were noted, but the extent and potential occurrence of other editing types remained unknown. Comparative analysis of deep transcriptome and genome data from Diplonema papillatum mitochondria reveals ∼220 post-transcriptional insertions of uridines, but no insertions of other nucleotides nor deletions. In addition, we detect in total 114 substitutions of cytosine by uridine and adenosine by inosine, amassed into unusually compact clusters. Inosines in transcripts were confirmed experimentally. This is the first report of adenosine-to-inosine editing of mRNAs and ribosomal RNAs in mitochondria. In mRNAs, editing causes mostly amino-acid additions and non-synonymous substitutions; in ribosomal RNAs, it permits formation of canonical secondary structures. Two extensively edited transcripts were compared across four diplonemids. The pattern of uridine-insertion editing is strictly conserved, whereas substitution editing has diverged dramatically, but still rendering diplonemid proteins more similar to other eukaryotic orthologs. We posit that RNA editing not only compensates but also sustains, or even accelerates, ultra-rapid evolution of genome structure and sequence in diplonemid mitochondria.

SCOPE++: sequence classification of homoPolymer emissions

BACKGROUND

mRNA polyadenylation, the addition of a poly(A) tail to the 3'-end of pre-mRNA, is a process critical to gene expression and regulation in eukaryotes. To understand the molecular mechanisms governing polyadenylation and other relevant biological processes, it is important to identify these poly(A) tails accurately in transcriptome sequencing data and differentiate them from artificial adapter sequences added in the sequencing process. But the annotation of these tails is complicated by the presence of sequencing errors and post-transcriptional modifications. While determining that a tail is present in a given transcript fragment is straight-forward, these obfuscations make the problem of boundary identification a challenge; conventional seed-and-extend algorithms struggle to accurately identify these poly(A) tail end-points. Further, all existing tools that we are aware of focus exclusively on the trimming of poly(A) tails, failing to provide the detailed information needed for studying the polyadenylation process.

RESULTS

We have created SCOPE++, an open-source tool for finding the precise border of poly(A) tails and other homopolymers in raw mRNA sequence reads. Based on a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) approach, SCOPE++ accurately identifies specific homopolymer sequences in error-prone EST/cDNA data or RNA-Seq data at a speed appropriate for large sequence sets.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that our tool can precisely identify poly(A) tails with near perfect accuracy at the speed required for high-throughput applications, providing a valuable resource for polyadenylation research.

Darned in 2013: inclusion of model organisms and linking with Wikipedia

DARNED (DAtabase of RNa EDiting, available at http://darned.ucc.ie) is a centralized repository of reference genome coordinates corresponding to RNA nucleotides having altered templated identities in the process of RNA editing. The data in DARNED are derived from published datasets of RNA editing events. RNA editing instances have been identified with various methods, such as bioinformatics screenings, deep sequencing and/or biochemical techniques. Here we report our current progress in the development and expansion of the DARNED. In addition to novel database features the DARNED update describes inclusion of Drosophila melanogaster and Mus musculus RNA editing events and the launch of a community-based annotation in the RNA WikiProject.

Complete characterization of the edited transcriptome of the mitochondrion of Physarum polycephalum using deep sequencing of RNA

RNAs transcribed from the mitochondrial genome of Physarum polycephalum are heavily edited. The most prevalent editing event is the insertion of single Cs, with Us and dinucleotides also added at specific sites. The existence of insertional editing makes gene identification difficult and localization of editing sites has relied upon characterization of individual cDNAs. We have now determined the complete mitochondrial transcriptome of Physarum using Illumina deep sequencing of purified mitochondrial RNA. We report the first instances of A and G insertions and sites of partial and extragenic editing in Physarum mitochondrial RNAs, as well as an additional 772 C, U and dinucleotide insertions. The notable lack of antisense RNAs in our non-size selected, directional library argues strongly against an RNA-guided editing mechanism. Also of interest are our findings that sites of C to U changes are unedited at a significantly higher frequency than insertional editing sites and that substitutional editing of neighboring sites appears to be coupled. Finally, in addition to the characterization of RNAs from 17 predicted genes, our data identified nine new mitochondrial genes, four of which encode proteins that do not resemble other proteins in the database. Curiously, one of the latter mRNAs contains no editing sites.

When you can't trust the DNA: RNA editing changes transcript sequences

RNA editing describes targeted sequence alterations in RNAs so that the transcript sequences differ from their DNA template. Since the original discovery of RNA editing in trypanosomes nearly 25 years ago more than a dozen such processes of nucleotide insertions, deletions, and exchanges have been identified in evolutionarily widely separated groups of the living world including plants, animals, fungi, protists, bacteria, and viruses. In many cases gene expression in mitochondria is affected, but RNA editing also takes place in chloroplasts and in nucleocytosolic genetic environments. While some RNA editing systems largely seem to repair defect genes (cryptogenes), others have obvious functions in modulating gene activities. The present review aims for an overview on the current states of research in the different systems of RNA editing by following a historic timeline along the respective original discoveries.

RNA editing is absent in a single mitochondrial gene of Didymium iridis

An open reading frame (ORF) was found in the mitochondrial genome of the Pan2-16 strain of Didymium iridis that showed high similarity to the NADH dehydrogenase subunit 3 (nad3) gene in other organisms. So far all other typical mitochondrial genes identified in this organism require RNA editing to generate ORFs capable of directing protein synthesis. The D. iridis sequence was compared to the putative nad3 gene in the related myxomycete Physarum polycephalum, which would require editing. Based on this comparison, editing sites could be predicted for the P. polycelphalum gene that would result in the synthesis of a highly conserved ND3 protein between the two organisms. To determine the editing status of the nad3 gene in other D. iridis strains, PCR was used to amplify this region from eight other independent isolates of the A1 Central American interbreeding series. In each case a 378 base pair ORF was detected by PCR amplification and sequencing. Three patterns of sequence variation were observed; however all base substitutions were in the third codon position and silent with respect to the amino acids encoded. The distribution of the sequence variants was mapped geographically. The requirement for RNA editing in all other typical mitochondrial genes of D. iridis and P. polycephalum and the presence of RNA editing in the nad3 gene of P. polycephalum suggest that the D. iridis nad3 gene might have been edited at one time. We propose that the D. iridis nad3 gene may have lost the requirement for RNA editing by reverse transcription of an edited transcript that subsequently was inserted into the genome.

Two forms of RNA editing are required for tRNA maturation in Physarum mitochondria

The mitochondrial genome of Physarum polycephalum encodes five tRNAs, four of which are edited by nucleotide insertion. Two of these tRNAs, tRNA(met1) and tRNA(met2), contain predicted mismatches at the beginning (proximal end) of the acceptor stem. In addition, the putative 5' end of tRNA(met2) overlaps the 3' end of a small, abundant, noncoding RNA, which we term ppoRNA. These anomalies led us to hypothesize that these two Physarum mitochondrial tRNAs undergo additional editing events. Here, we show that tRNA(met1) and tRNA(met2) each has a nonencoded G at its 5' end. In contrast to the other nucleotides that are added to Physarum mitochondrial RNAs, these extra G residues are likely added post-transcriptionally based on (1) the absence of added G in precursor transcripts containing inserted C and AA residues, (2) the presence of potential intermediates characteristic of 5' replacement editing, and (3) preferential incorporation of GTP into tRNA molecules under conditions that do not support transcription. This is the first report of both post-transcriptional nucleotide insertions and the addition of single Gs in P. polycephalum mitochondrial transcripts. We postulate that tRNA(met1) and tRNA(met2) are acted upon by an activity similar to that present in the mitochondria of certain other amoebozoons and chytrid fungi, suggesting that enzymes that repair the 5' end of tRNAs may be widespread.

Distinct roles for sequences upstream of and downstream from Physarum editing sites

RNAs in the mitochondria of Physarum polycephalum contain nonencoded nucleotides that are added during RNA synthesis. Essentially all steady-state RNAs are accurately and fully edited, yet the signals guiding these precise nucleotide insertions are presently unknown. To localize the regions of the template that are required for editing, we constructed a series of chimeric templates that substitute varying amounts of DNA either upstream of or downstream from C insertion sites. Remarkably, all sequences necessary for C addition are contained within approximately 9 base pairs on either side of the insertion site. In addition, our data strongly suggest that sequences within this critical region affect different steps in the editing reaction. Template alterations upstream of an editing site influence nucleotide selection and/or insertion, while downstream changes affect editing site recognition and templated extension from the added, unpaired nucleotide. The data presented here provide the first evidence that individual regions of the DNA template play discrete mechanistic roles and represent a crucial initial step toward defining the source of the editing specificity in Physarum mitochondria. In addition, these findings have mechanistic implications regarding the potential involvement of the mitochondrial RNA polymerase in the editing reaction.

Non-DNA-templated addition of nucleotides to the 3' end of RNAs by the mitochondrial RNA polymerase of Physarum polycephalum

Mitochondrial gene expression is necessary for proper mitochondrial biogenesis. Genes on the mitochondrial DNA are transcribed by a dedicated mitochondrial RNA polymerase (mtRNAP) that is encoded in the nucleus and imported into mitochondria. In the myxomycete Physarum polycephalum, nucleotides that are not specified by the mitochondrial DNA templates are inserted into some RNAs, a process called RNA editing. This is an essential step in the expression of these RNAs, as the insertion of the nontemplated nucleotides creates open reading frames for the production of proteins from mRNAs or produces required secondary structure in rRNAs and tRNAs. The nontemplated nucleotide is added to the 3' end of the RNA as the RNA is being synthesized during mitochondrial transcription. Because RNA editing is cotranscriptional, the mtRNAP is implicated in RNA editing as well as transcription. We have cloned the cDNA for the mtRNAP of Physarum and have expressed the mtRNAP in Escherichia coli. We have used in vitro transcription assays based on the Physarum mtRNAP to identify a novel activity associated with the mtRNAP in which non-DNA-templated nucleotides are added to the 3' end of RNAs. Any of the four ribonucleoside triphosphates (rNTPs) can act as precursors for this process, and this novel activity is observed when only one rNTP is supplied, a condition under which transcription does not occur. The implications of this activity for the mechanism of RNA editing are discussed.

RNA editing in Physarum mitochondria: assays and biochemical approaches

Mitochondrial RNAs in the myxomycete Physarum polycephalum differ from the templates from which they are transcribed in defined ways. Most transcripts contain nucleotides that are not present in their respective genes. These "extra" nucleotides are added during RNA synthesis by an unknown mechanism. Other differences observed between Physarum mitochondrial RNAs and the mitochondrial genome include nucleotide deletions, C to U changes, and the replacement of one nucleotide for another at the 5' end of tRNAs. All of these alterations are remarkably precise and highly efficient in vivo. Many of these editing events can be replicated in vitro, and here we describe both the in vitro systems used to study editing in Physarum mitochondria and the assays that have been developed to assess the extent of editing of RNAs generated in these systems at individual sites.

Identification of a putative mitochondrial RNA polymerase from Physarum polycephalum: characterization, expression, purification, and transcription in vitro

Mitochondrial RNA polymerases (mtRNAPs) are necessary for the biogenesis of mitochondria and for proper mitochondrial function since they transcribe genes on mtDNA for tRNAs, rRNAs, and mRNAs. The unique type of RNA editing identified in mitochondria of Physarum polycephalum is thought to be closely associated with transcription, and as such, RNA editing activity would be expected to be closely associated with the mtRNAP. In order to better characterize the role of mtRNAPs in mitochondrial biogenesis and to determine the role of the Physarum mtRNAP in RNA editing, the cDNA of the Physarum mtRNAP was identified using PCR and degenerate primers designed from conserved motifs in mtRNAPs. This amplification product was used to screen a cDNA library for the cDNA corresponding to the Physarum mtRNAP. A cDNA corresponding to a 3.2 kb transcript containing a 997 codon open reading frame was identified. The amino acid sequence inferred from the open reading frame contains motifs characteristic of mtRNAPs. To confirm that a cDNA for an RNA polymerase had been isolated, the cDNA was expressed in E. coli as an N-terminal maltose binding protein (MBP) fusion protein. The fusion protein was purified by affinity chromatography and shown to have DNA-directed RNA polymerase activity. This functional mtRNAP will be useful for in vitro studies of mitochondrial transcription and RNA editing.

Discovery of new genes and deletion editing in Physarum mitochondria enabled by a novel algorithm for finding edited mRNAs

Gene finding is complicated in organisms that exhibit insertional RNA editing. Here, we demonstrate how our new algorithm Predictor of Insertional Editing (PIE) can be used to locate genes whose mRNAs are subjected to multiple frameshifting events, and extend the algorithm to include probabilistic predictions for sites of nucleotide insertion; this feature is particularly useful when designing primers for sequencing edited RNAs. Applying this algorithm, we successfully identified the nad2, nad4L, nad6 and atp8 genes within the mitochondrial genome of Physarum polycephalum, which had gone undetected by existing programs. Characterization of their mRNA products led to the unanticipated discovery of nucleotide deletion editing in Physarum. The deletion event, which results in the removal of three adjacent A residues, was confirmed by primer extension sequencing of total RNA. This finding is remarkable in that it comprises the first known instance of nucleotide deletion in this organelle, to be contrasted with nearly 500 sites of single and dinucleotide addition in characterized mitochondrial RNAs. Statistical analysis of this larger pool of editing sites indicates that there are significant biases in the 2 nt immediately upstream of editing sites, including a reduced incidence of nucleotide repeats, in addition to the previously identified purine-U bias.

Unexpectedly complex editing patterns at dinucleotide insertion sites in Physarum mitochondria

Many of the RNAs transcribed from the mitochondrial genome of Physarum polycephalum are edited by the insertion of nonencoded nucleotides, which are added either singly or as dinucleotides. In addition, at least one mRNA is also subject to substitutional editing in which encoded C residues are changed to U residues posttranscriptionally. We have shown previously that the predominant type of editing in these organelles, the insertion of nonencoded single C residues, occurs cotranscriptionally at the growing end of the RNA chain. However, less is known about the timing of dinucleotide addition, and it has been suggested that these insertions occur at a later stage in RNA maturation. Here we examine the addition of both single nucleotides and dinucleotides into nascent RNAs synthesized in vitro and in vivo. The distribution of added nucleotides within individual cloned cDNAs supports the hypothesis that all insertion sites are processed at the same time relative to transcription. In addition, the patterns of partial editing and misediting observed within these nascent RNAs suggest that separate factors may be required at a subset of dinucleotide insertion sites and raise the possibility that in vivo, nucleotides may be added to RNA and then changed posttranscriptionally.

Expanding genome capacity via RNA editing

RNA editing, which results in the creation of RNA molecules that differ from the template from which they were made, is a highly specific process. Alterations include converting one base to another, removal of one nucleotide and substitution of another, deletion of encoded residues, and insertion of non-templated nucleotides. Such changes have marked effects on gene expression, ranging from defined amino acid changes to the de novo creation of entire open reading frames. Editing can be regulated in a developmental or tissue-specific manner, and is likely to play a role in the etiology of human disease.

Molecular regulation, evolutionary, and functional adaptations associated with C to U editing of mammalian apolipoproteinB mRNA

RNA editing encompasses an important class of co- or posttranscriptional nucleic acid modification that has expanded our understanding of the range of mechanisms that facilitate genetic plasticity. Since the initial description of RNA editing in trypanosome mitochondria, a model of gene regulation has emerged that now encompasses a diverse range of biochemical and genetic mechanisms by which nuclear, mitochondrial, and t-RNA sequences are modified from templated versions encoded in the genome. RNA editing is genetically and biochemically distinct from other RNA modifications such as splicing, capping, and polyadenylation although, as discussed in Section I, these modifications may have relevance to the regulation of certain types of mammalian RNA editing. This review will focus on C to U RNA editing, in particular, the biochemical and genetic mechanisms that regulate this process in mammals. These mechanisms will be examined in the context of the prototype model of C to U RNA editing, namely the posttranscriptional cytidine deamination targeting a single nucleotide in mammalian apolipoproteinB (apoB). Other examples of C to U RNA editing will be discussed and the molecular mechanisms--where known--contrasted with those regulating apoB RNA editing.

Rewriting the information in DNA: RNA editing in kinetoplastids and myxomycetes

RNA editing has a major impact on the genes and genomes that it modifies. Editing by insertion, deletion and base conversion exists in nuclear, mitochondrial and viral genomes throughout the eukaryotic lineage. Editing was first discovered in kinetoplastids, and recent work has resulted in the characterization of some components of the editing machinery. Two proteins with ligase activity have been identified in Trypanosoma brucei, and other proteins in the editosome complex are yielding to the probe of research. A second group of protists, myxomycetes, are unique in their use of four different types of editing within a single transcript. Phylogenetic analysis of editing in representative myxomycetes revealed a different history of the four types of editing in this lineage. Development of a soluble in vitro editing system has provided further support for the co-transcriptional nature of editing in Physarum polycephalum, and will certainly provide future opportunities for understanding this mysterious process.

Editing site recognition and nucleotide insertion are separable processes in Physarum mitochondria

Insertional RNA editing in Physarum polycephalum is a complex process involving the specific addition of non-templated nucleotides to nascent mitochondrial transcripts. Since all four ribonucleotides are substrates for the editing activity(s), both the site of insertion and the identity of the nucleotide to be added at a particular position must be specified, but the signals for these events have yet to be elucidated. Here we report the occurrence of sporadic errors in RNAs synthesized in vitro. These mistakes, which include omission of encoded nucleotides as well as misinsertions, occur only on templates that support editing. The pattern of these misediting events indicates that editing site recognition and nucleotide addition are separable events, and that the recognition step involves features of the mitochondrial template that are required for editing. The larger deletions lack all templated nucleotides between editing sites, suggesting that the transcription/editing apparatus can "jump" from one insertion site to another, perhaps mediated by interactions with editing determinants, while smaller omissions most likely reflect misalignment of the transcript upon resumption of templated RNA synthesis.

Cotranscriptional editing of Physarum mitochondrial RNA requires local features of the native template

RNAs in the mitochondrion of Physarum polycephalum are edited by the precise cotranscriptional addition of non-encoded nucleotides. Here we describe experiments to address the basis of editing specificity using a series of chimeric templates generated by either rearranging the DNA present in editing-competent mitochondrial transcription elongation complexes (mtTECs) or linking it to exogenous DNA. Notably, run-on transcripts synthesized from rearranged mtTECs are edited at the natural sites, even when different genes are ligated together, yet exogenous, deproteinized DNA does not support editing. Furthermore, the accuracy of nucleotide insertion in chimeric RNAs argues that any cis-acting determinants of cytidine insertion are limited to small regions surrounding editing sites. Taken together, these observations strongly suggest that template-associated factors affect read-out of the mitochondrial genome.