Stop codon selection in eukaryotic translation termination: comparison of the discriminating potential between human and ciliate eRF1s

Update on selenoprotein biosynthesis

SIGNIFICANCE

Selenium is an essential trace element that is incorporated in the small but vital family of proteins, namely the selenoproteins, as the selenocysteine amino acid residue. In humans, 25 selenoprotein genes have been characterized. The most remarkable trait of selenoprotein biosynthesis is the cotranslational insertion of selenocysteine by the recoding of a UGA codon, normally decoded as a stop signal.

RECENT ADVANCES

In eukaryotes, a set of dedicated cis- and trans-acting factors have been identified as well as a variety of regulatory mechanisms, factors, or elements that control the selenoprotein expression at the level of the UGA-selenocysteine recoding process, offering a fascinating playground in the field of translational control. It appeared that the central players are two RNA molecules: the selenocysteine insertion sequence (SECIS) element within selenoprotein mRNA and the selenocysteine-tRNA([Ser]Sec); and their interacting partners.

CRITICAL ISSUES

After a couple of decades, despite many advances in the field and the discovery of many essential and regulatory components, the precise mechanism of UGA-selenocysteine recoding remains elusive and more complex than anticipated, with many layers of control. This review offers an update of selenoproteome biosynthesis and regulation in eukaryotes.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

The regulation of selenoproteins in response to a variety of pathophysiological conditions and cellular stressors, including selenium levels, oxidative stress, replicative senescence, or cancer, awaits further detailed investigation. Clearly, the efficiency of UGA-selenocysteine recoding is the limiting stage of selenoprotein synthesis. The sequence of events leading Sec-tRNA([Ser]Sec) delivery to ribosomal A site awaits further analysis, notably at the level of a three-dimensional structure.

Genetic analysis of L123 of the tRNA-mimicking eukaryote release factor eRF1, an amino acid residue critical for discrimination of stop codons

In eukaryotes, the tRNA-mimicking polypeptide-chain release factor, eRF1, decodes stop codons on the ribosome in a complex with eRF3; this complex exhibits striking structural similarity to the tRNA–eEF1A–GTP complex. Although amino acid residues or motifs of eRF1 that are critical for stop codon discrimination have been identified, the details of the molecular mechanisms involved in the function of the ribosomal decoding site remain obscure. Here, we report analyses of the position-123 amino acid of eRF1 (L123 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae eRF1), a residue that is phylogenetically conserved among species with canonical and variant genetic codes. In vivo readthrough efficiency analysis and genetic growth complementation analysis of the residue-123 systematic mutants suggested that this amino acid functions in stop codon discrimination in a manner coupled with eRF3 binding, and distinctive from previously reported adjacent residues. Furthermore, aminoglycoside antibiotic sensitivity analysis and ribosomal docking modeling of eRF1 in a quasi-A/T state suggested a functional interaction between the side chain of L123 and ribosomal residues critical for codon recognition in the decoding site, as a molecular explanation for coupling with eRF3. Our results provide insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying stop codon discrimination by a tRNA-mimicking protein on the ribosome.

New insights into stop codon recognition by eRF1

In eukaryotes, translation termination is performed by eRF1, which recognizes stop codons via its N-terminal domain. Many previous studies based on point mutagenesis, cross-linking experiments or eRF1 chimeras have investigated the mechanism by which the stop signal is decoded by eRF1. Conserved motifs, such as GTS and YxCxxxF, were found to be important for termination efficiency, but the recognition mechanism remains unclear. We characterized a region of the eRF1 N-terminal domain, the P1 pocket, that we had previously shown to be involved in termination efficiency. We performed alanine scanning mutagenesis of this region, and we quantified in vivo readthrough efficiency for each alanine mutant. We identified two residues, arginine 65 and lysine 109, as critical for recognition of the three stop codons. We also demonstrated a role for the serine 33 and serine 70 residues in UGA decoding in vivo. NMR analysis of the alanine mutants revealed that the correct conformation of this region was controlled by the YxCxxxF motif. By combining our genetic data with a structural analysis of eRF1 mutants, we were able to formulate a new model in which the stop codon interacts with eRF1 through the P1 pocket.

Therapeutics based on stop codon readthrough

Nonsense suppression therapy encompasses approaches aimed at suppressing translation termination at in-frame premature termination codons (PTCs, also known as nonsense mutations) to restore deficient protein function. In this review, we examine the current status of PTC suppression as a therapy for genetic diseases caused by nonsense mutations. We discuss what is currently known about the mechanism of PTC suppression as well as therapeutic approaches under development to suppress PTCs. The approaches considered include readthrough drugs, suppressor tRNAs, PTC pseudouridylation, and inhibition of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. We also discuss the barriers that currently limit the clinical application of nonsense suppression therapy and suggest how some of these difficulties may be overcome. Finally, we consider how PTC suppression may play a role in the clinical treatment of genetic diseases caused by nonsense mutations.

Two-step model of stop codon recognition by eukaryotic release factor eRF1

Release factor eRF1 plays a key role in the termination of protein synthesis in eukaryotes. The eRF1 consists of three domains (N, M and C) that perform unique roles in termination. Previous studies of eRF1 point mutants and standard/variant code eRF1 chimeras unequivocally demonstrated a direct involvement of the highly conserved N-domain motifs (NIKS, YxCxxxF and GTx) in stop codon recognition. In the current study, we extend this work by investigating the role of the 41 invariant and conserved N-domain residues in stop codon decoding by human eRF1. Using a combination of the conservative and non-conservative amino acid substitutions, we measured the functional activity of >80 mutant eRF1s in an in vitro reconstituted eukaryotic translation system and selected 15 amino acid residues essential for recognition of different stop codon nucleotides. Furthermore, toe-print analyses provide evidence of a conformational rearrangement of ribosomal complexes that occurs during binding of eRF1 to messenger RNA and reflects stop codon decoding activity of eRF1. Based on our experimental data and molecular modelling of the N-domain at the ribosomal A site, we propose a two-step model of stop codon decoding in the eukaryotic ribosome.

A single amino acid change of translation termination factor eRF1 switches between bipotent and omnipotent stop-codon specificity

In eukaryotes a single class-1 translation termination factor eRF1 decodes the three stop codons: UAA, UAG and UGA. Some ciliates, like Euplotes, have a variant code, and here eRF1s exhibit UAR-only specificity, whereas UGA is reassigned as a sense codon. Since eukaryote eRF1 stop-codon recognition is associated with its N-terminal domain, structural features should exist in the N domain of ciliate eRF1s that restrict their stop-codon specificity. Using an in vitro reconstituted eukaryotic translation system we demonstrate here that a chimeric eRF1 composed of the N domain of Euplotes aediculatus eRF1 fused to the MC domains of human eRF1 exhibits UAR-only specificity. Functional analysis of eRF1 chimeras constructed by swapping Euplotes N domain sequences with the cognate regions from human eRF1 as well as site-directed mutagenesis of human eRF1 highlighted the crucial role of the alanine residue in position 70 of E. aediculatus eRF1 in restricting UGA decoding. Switching the UAR-only specificity of E. aediculatus eRF1 to omnipotent mode is due to a single point mutation. Furthermore, we examined the influence of eRF3 on the ability of chimeric and mutant eRF1s to induce peptide release in response to different stop codons.

In vitro incorporation of nonnatural amino acids into protein using tRNA(Cys)-derived opal, ochre, and amber suppressor tRNAs

Amber suppressor tRNAs are widely used to incorporate nonnatural amino acids into proteins to serve as probes of structure, environment, and function. The utility of this approach would be greatly enhanced if multiple probes could be simultaneously incorporated at different locations in the same protein without other modifications. Toward this end, we have developed amber, opal, and ochre suppressor tRNAs derived from Escherichia coli, and yeast tRNA(Cys) that incorporate a chemically modified cysteine residue with high selectivity at the cognate UAG, UGA, and UAA stop codons in an in vitro translation system. These synthetic tRNAs were aminoacylated in vitro, and the labile aminoacyl bond was stabilized by covalently attaching a fluorescent dye to the cysteine sulfhydryl group. Readthrough efficiency (amber > opal > ochre) was substantially improved by eRF1/eRF3 inhibition with an RNA aptamer, thus overcoming an intrinsic hierarchy in stop codon selection that limits UGA and UAA termination suppression in higher eukaryotic translation systems. This approach now allows concurrent incorporation of two different modified amino acids at amber and opal codons with a combined apparent readthrough efficiency of up to 25% when compared with the parent protein lacking a stop codon. As such, it significantly expands the possibilities for incorporating nonnative amino acids for protein structure/function studies.

Translation termination in pyrrolysine-utilizing archaea

Although some data link archaeal and eukaryotic translation, the overall mechanism of protein synthesis in archaea remains largely obscure. Both archaeal (aRF1) and eukaryotic (eRF1) single release factors recognize all three stop codons. The archaeal genus Methanosarcinaceae contains two aRF1 homologs, and also uses the UAG stop to encode the 22nd amino acid, pyrrolysine. Here we provide an analysis of the last stage of archaeal translation in pyrrolysine-utilizing species. We demonstrated that only one of two Methanosarcina barkeri aRF1 homologs possesses activity and recognizes all three stop codons. The second aRF1 homolog may have another unknown function. The mechanism of pyrrolysine incorporation in the Methanosarcinaceae is discussed.

Molecular dissection of translation termination mechanism identifies two new critical regions in eRF1

Translation termination in eukaryotes is completed by two interacting factors eRF1 and eRF3. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, these proteins are encoded by the genes SUP45 and SUP35, respectively. The eRF1 protein interacts directly with the stop codon at the ribosomal A-site, whereas eRF3—a GTPase protein—probably acts as a proofreading factor, coupling stop codon recognition to polypeptide chain release. We performed random PCR mutagenesis of SUP45 and screened the library for mutations resulting in increased eRF1 activity. These mutations led to the identification of two new pockets in domain 1 (P1 and P2) involved in the regulation of eRF1 activity. Furthermore, we identified novel mutations located in domains 2 and 3, which confer stop codon specificity to eRF1. Our findings are consistent with the model of a closed-active conformation of eRF1 and shed light on two new functional regions of the protein.

Sites of 18S rRNA contacting mRNA 3' and 5' of the P site codon in human ribosome: a cross-linking study with mRNAs carrying 4-thiouridines at specific positions

Long synthetic mRNAs were used to study the positioning of the E site codon, the 2nd and 3rd nucleotides of the A site bound codon and a nucleotide 3' of this codon with respect to the 18S rRNA in the human 80S ribosome. The mRNAs contained a GAC triplet coding for Asp and a single 4-thiouridine residue (s(4)U) upstream or downstream of the GAC codon. In the presence of tRNA(Asp), the GAC codon of the mRNAs was targeted to the ribosomal P site thus placing s(4)U in one of the following positions -3, -2, -1, +5, +6 or +7 with respect to the first nucleotide of the P site bound codon. It was found that mRNAs that bore s(4)U in positions +5 to +7 cross-linked to the 18S rRNA nucleotides C1696, C1698 and 1820-1825, the distribution of cross-links among these targets depending on the position of s(4)U. Cross-links of mRNAs containing s(4)U in positions -3 to -1 were found in the region 1699-1704 of the 18S rRNA. In the absence of tRNA, all mRNAs cross-linked only to C1696 and C1698. Absence of the cross-linked nucleotides C1696 and C1698 in the case of mRNAs containing s(4)U in positions -3 to -1 confirmed that tRNA(Asp) actually phased the mRNA on the ribosome.

Expression of open reading frames in silkworm pupal cDNA library

A cDNA library containing 2409 singletons was constructed from whole silkworm pupae (Bombyx mori) In addition, the types of genes overexpressed in pupa were analyzed. These genes contained 79 types of proteins with the exception of enzyme, mitochondrial DNA, andribosomal protein. Also analyzed were the expression and nonexpression of open reading frame (ORF) sequences in Escherichia coli. cDNA sequences were compared to the silkworm (B. mori) genome in the GenBank database and the silkworm cDNA database including the SilkBase and KAIKOBLAST databases and 498 novel expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and 217 unknown ESTs were found. After comparison with all available ORF-complete mRNA sequences from the same organism (fruitfly, mosquito, and apis) in the RefSeq collection, 1659 full-length cDNA were identified. In addition, the structure of silkworm mRNA was analyzed, and it was found that 66.8% of silkworm mRNA tailed with poly(A) contained the highly conserved AAUAAA signal and the signal located 10-17 nucleotides upstream of the putative poly(A). Finally, the composition of nucleotides in promoter region for all ESTs was surveyed. The results imply that the TTTTA box may possess some functions in regulating transcription and expression of some genes.

Different modes of stop codon restriction by the Stylonychia and Paramecium eRF1 translation termination factors

In universal-code eukaryotes, a single-translation termination factor, eukaryote class-1 polypeptide release factor (eRF1), decodes the three stop codons: UAA, UAG, and UGA. In some ciliates, like Stylonychia and Paramecium, eRF1s exhibit UGA-only decoding specificity, whereas UAG and UAA are reassigned as sense codons. Because variant-code ciliates may have evolved from universal-code ancestor(s), structural features should exist in ciliate eRF1s that restrict their stop codon recognition. In omnipotent eRF1s, stop codon recognition is associated with the N-terminal domain of the protein. Using both in vitro and in vivo assays, we show here that chimeric molecules composed of the N-terminal domain of Stylonychia eRF1 fused to the core domain (MC domain) of human eRF1 retained specificity toward UGA; this unambiguously associates eRF1 stop codon specificity to the nature of its N-terminal domain. Functional analysis of eRF1 chimeras constructed by swapping ciliate N-terminal domain sequences with the matching ones from the human protein highlighted the crucial role of the tripeptide QFM in restricting Stylonychia eRF1 specificity toward UGA. Using the site-directed mutagenesis, we show that Paramecium eRF1 specificity toward UGA resides within the NIKS (amino acids 61-64) and YxCxxxF (amino acids 124-131) motifs. Thus, we establish that eRF1 from two different ciliates relies on different molecular mechanisms to achieve specificity toward the UGA stop codon. This finding suggests that eRF1 restriction of specificity to only UGA might have been an early event occurring in independent instances in ciliate evolutionary history, possibly facilitating the reassignment of UAG and UAA to sense codons.

Sequencing of random Euplotes crassus macronuclear genes supports a high frequency of +1 translational frameshifting

Programmed translational frameshifts have been identified in genes from a broad range of organisms, but typically only a very few genes in a given organism require a frameshift for expression. In contrast, a recent analysis of gene sequences available in GenBank from ciliates in the genus Euplotes indicated that >5% required one or more +1 translational frameshifts to produce their predicted protein products. However, this sample of genes was nonrandom, biased, and derived from multiple Euplotes species. To test whether there truly is an abundance of frameshift genes in Euplotes, and to more accurately assess their frequency, we sequenced a random sample of 25 cloned genes/macronuclear DNA molecules from Euplotes crassus. Three new candidate +1 frameshift genes were identified in the sample that encode a membrane occupation and recognition nexus (MORN) repeat protein, a C(2)H(2)-type zinc finger protein, and a Ser/Thr protein kinase. Reverse transcription-PCR analyses indicate that all three genes are expressed in vegetatively proliferating cells and that the mRNAs retain the requirement of a frameshift. Although the sample of sequenced genes is relatively small, the results indicate that the frequency of genes requiring frameshifts in E. crassus is between 3.7% and 31.7% (at a 95% confidence interval). The current and past data also indicate that frameshift sites are found predominantly in genes that likely encode nonabundant proteins in the cell.

Distinct paths to stop codon reassignment by the variant-code organisms Tetrahymena and Euplotes

The reassignment of stop codons is common among many ciliate species. For example, Tetrahymena species recognize only UGA as a stop codon, while Euplotes species recognize only UAA and UAG as stop codons. Recent studies have shown that domain 1 of the translation termination factor eRF1 mediates stop codon recognition. While it is commonly assumed that changes in domain 1 of ciliate eRF1s are responsible for altered stop codon recognition, this has never been demonstrated in vivo. To carry out such an analysis, we made hybrid proteins that contained eRF1 domain 1 from either Tetrahymena thermophila or Euplotes octocarinatus fused to eRF1 domains 2 and 3 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that the Tetrahymena hybrid eRF1 efficiently terminated at all three stop codons when expressed in yeast cells, indicating that domain 1 is not the sole determinant of stop codon recognition in Tetrahymena species. In contrast, the Euplotes hybrid facilitated efficient translation termination at UAA and UAG codons but not at the UGA codon. Together, these results indicate that while domain 1 facilitates stop codon recognition, other factors can influence this process. Our findings also indicate that these two ciliate species used distinct approaches to diverge from the universal genetic code.

Comparative analysis of base biases around the stop codons in six eukaryotes

Using full-length cDNA sequences, a comparative analysis of sequence patterns around the stop codons in six eukaryotes was performed. Here, it was showed that the codon immediately before and after the stop codons (defined as -1 codon and +1 codon, respectively) were much more biased than other examined positions, especially at the second position of -1 codons and the first position of +1 codons which were rich in As/Us and purines, respectively, for most species. The author speculated that strongly biased sequence pattern from position -2 to +4 might act as an extended translation termination signal. Translation termination was catalyzed by release factors that recognized the stop codons. The multiple amino acid sequence alignment of eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1) of 20 species showed that there were 16 residue sites that were strictly conserved, especially the invariant amino acids Ile70 and Lys71. Accordingly, it could be inferred that those candidate amino acids might involve in the recognition process. Moreover, the possible stop signal recognition hypothesis was also discussed herein.

Decoding the decoding region: analysis of eukaryotic release factor (eRF1) stop codon-binding residues

Peptide synthesis in eukaryotes terminates when eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1) binds to an mRNA stop codon and occupies the ribosomal A site. Domain 1 of the eRF1 protein has been implicated in stop codon recognition in a number of experimental studies. In order to further pinpoint the residues of this protein involved in stop codon recognition, we sequenced and compared eRF1 genes from a variety of ciliated protozoan species. We then performed a series of computational analyses to evaluate the conservation, accessibility, and structural environment of each amino acid located in domain 1. With this new dataset and methodology, we were able to identify eight specific amino acid sites important for stop codon recognition and also to propose a set of cooperative paired substitutions that may underlie stop codon reassignment. Our results are more consistent with current experimental data than previously described models.

Newly sequenced eRF1s from ciliates: the diversity of stop codon usage and the molecular surfaces that are important for stop codon interactions

The genetic code of nuclear genes in some ciliates was found to differ from that of other organisms in the assignment of UGA, UAG, and UAA codons, which are normally assigned as stop codons. In some ciliate species, the universal stop codons UAA and UAG instead encode glutamine. In some other ciliates, the universal stop codon UGA appears to be translated as cysteine or tryptophan. Eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1) is a key protein in stop codon recognition, thus, the protein is believed to play an important role in the stop codon reassignment in ciliates. We have cloned, sequenced, and analyzed the cDNA of eRF1 from four ciliate species of three different classes: Karyorelictea (Loxodes striatus), Heterotrichea (Blepharisma musculus), and Litostomatea (Didinium nasutum, Dileptus margaritifer). Phylogenetic analysis of these eRF1s supports the hypothesis that the genetic code in ciliates has deviated independently several times from the universal genetic code, and that different ciliate eRF1s may have undergone different processes to change the codon specificity. Using computational methods, we have also suggested areas on the surface of eRF1s that are important for stop codon recognition in ciliate eRF1s.

GTP hydrolysis by eRF3 facilitates stop codon decoding during eukaryotic translation termination

Translation termination in eukaryotes is mediated by two release factors, eRF1 and eRF3. eRF1 recognizes each of the three stop codons (UAG, UAA, and UGA) and facilitates release of the nascent polypeptide chain. eRF3 is a GTPase that stimulates the translation termination process by a poorly characterized mechanism. In this study, we examined the functional importance of GTP hydrolysis by eRF3 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that mutations that reduced the rate of GTP hydrolysis also reduced the efficiency of translation termination at some termination signals but not others. As much as a 17-fold decrease in the termination efficiency was observed at some tetranucleotide termination signals (characterized by the stop codon and the first following nucleotide), while no effect was observed at other termination signals. To determine whether this stop signal-dependent decrease in the efficiency of translation termination was due to a defect in either eRF1 or eRF3 recycling, we reduced the level of eRF1 or eRF3 in cells by expressing them individually from the CUP1 promoter. We found that the limitation of either factor resulted in a general decrease in the efficiency of translation termination rather than a decrease at a subset of termination signals as observed with the eRF3 GTPase mutants. We also found that overproduction of eRF1 was unable to increase the efficiency of translation termination at any termination signals. Together, these results suggest that the GTPase activity of eRF3 is required to couple the recognition of translation termination signals by eRF1 to efficient polypeptide chain release.

The Molecular Mechanics of Eukaryotic Translation

Great advances have been made in the past three decades in understanding the molecular mechanics underlying protein synthesis in bacteria, but our understanding of the corresponding events in eukaryotic organisms is only beginning to catch up. In this review we describe the current state of our knowledge and ignorance of the molecular mechanics underlying eukaryotic translation. We discuss the mechanisms conserved across the three kingdoms of life as well as the important divergences that have taken place in the pathway.

Antizyme frameshifting as a functional probe of eukaryotic translational termination

Translation termination in eukaryotes is mediated by the release factors eRF1 and eRF3, but mechanisms of the interplay between these factors are not fully understood, due partly to the difficulty of measuring termination on eukaryotic mRNAs. Here, we describe an in vitro system for the assay of termination using competition with programmed frameshifting at the recoding signal of mammalian antizyme. The efficiency of antizyme frameshifting in rabbit reticulocyte lysates was reduced by addition of recombinant rabbit eRF1 and eRF3 in a synergistic manner. Addition of suppressor tRNA to this assay system revealed competition with a third event, stop codon readthrough. Using these assays, we demonstrated that an eRF3 mutation at the GTPase domain repressed termination in a dominant negative fashion probably by binding to eRF1. The effect of the release factors and the suppressor tRNA showed that the stop codon at the antizyme frameshift site is relatively inefficient compared to either the natural termination signals at the end of protein coding sequences or the readthrough signal from a plant virus. The system affords a convenient assay for release factor activity and has provided some novel views of the mechanism of antizyme frameshifting.

Stop codons and UGG promote efficient binding of the polypeptide release factor eRF1 to the ribosomal A site

To investigate the codon dependence of human eRF1 binding to the mRNA-ribosome complex, we examined the formation of photocrosslinks between ribosomal components and mRNAs bearing a photoactivable 4-thiouridine probe in the first position of the codon located in the A site. Addition of eRF1 to the phased mRNA-ribosome complexes triggers a codon-dependent quenching of crosslink formation. The concentration of eRF1 triggering half quenching ranges from low for the three stop codons, to intermediate for s4UGG and high for other near-cognate triplets. A theoretical analysis of the photochemical processes occurring in a two-state bimolecular model raises a number of stringent conditions, fulfilled by the system studied here, and shows that in any case sound KD values can be extracted if the ratio mT/KD<<1 (mT is total concentration of mRNA added). Considering the KD values obtained for the stop, s4UGG and sense codons (approximately 0.06 microM, 0.45 microM and 2.3 microM, respectively) and our previous finding that only the stop and s4UGG codons are able to promote formation of an eRF1-mRNA crosslink, implying a role for the NIKS loop at the tip of the N domain, we propose a two-step model for eRF1 binding to the A site: a codon-independent bimolecular step is followed by an isomerisation step observed solely with stop and s4UGG codons. Full recognition of the stop codons by the N domain of eRF1 triggers a rearrangement of bound eRF1 from an open to a closed conformation, allowing the universally conserved GGQ loop at the tip of the M domain to come into close proximity of the peptidyl transferase center of the ribosome. UGG is expected to behave as a cryptic stop codon, which, owing to imperfect eRF1-codon recognition, does not allow full reorientation of the M domain of eRF1. As far as the physical steps of eRF1 binding to the ribosome are considered, they appear to closely mimic the behaviour of the tRNA/EF-Tu/GTP complex, but clearly eRF1 is endowed with a greater conformational flexibility than tRNA.