Myocarditis: endomyocardial biopsy and circulating anti-heart autoantibodies are key to diagnosis and personalized etiology-directed treatment

A case report of right-sided heart failure secondary to JAK2-mutation Loeffler endocarditis

Loeffler's endocarditis (LE) is the cardiac manifestation of hypereosinophilic syndrome. We present a case of LE in a 45-year-old female, resulting in diffuse endothelial fibrosis and severe right-sided heart failure. The patient was admitted with dyspnoea and oedema, with haematology revealing an absolute eosinophil count of 20.9 × 109. Imaging showed near-complete obliteration of the right ventricular apical and formation of thromboses. Endomyocardial biopsy indicated diffuse fibrous hyperplasia of the endocardium with fibrinous thrombi rich in eosinophils. Molecular and cytogenetic analyses of bone marrow cells showed no signs of FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion, PDGFRB mutation, abnormal myeloid maturation, or a lymphoproliferative disorder. Flow cytometry indicated no clonality, ruling out chronic eosinophilic leukaemia. Gene mutation screening discovered a p.L583_A586delinesS mutation in the JAK2 gene. Following treatment with ruxolitinib, the patient's eosinophil levels normalized, but unfortunately, the damage to the heart was irreversible. The patient was hospitalized multiple times due to right heart failure and resistance to diuretics. After thorough discussions with the medical team, it was determined that a heart transplantation would be the most effective treatment. Following the surgery, the patient successfully navigated the postoperative critical period with the support of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and ventilator-assisted ventilation but subsequently developed an acquired Intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) and a depressive state. Fortunately, the patient gradually recovered from these complications.

Immunomodulating and Immunosuppressive Therapy for Virus-Negative Immune-Mediated Myocarditis

Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the myocardium caused by infectious and noninfectious agents. Clinical manifestations range from mildly symptomatic forms to acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden death. Myocarditis is still a challenging diagnosis because of its wide variability in clinical presentation and unpredictable course. Moreover, a standardized, specific treatment in not yet available. Immunosuppressive treatment for virus-negative lymphocytic myocarditis is still controversial. Conversely, immunosuppression is well established in sarcoidosis, eosinophilic, giant-cell, drug hypersensitivity, and trauma-related myocarditis as well as lymphocytic myocarditis associated with connective tissue diseases or with the rejection of a transplanted heart. Recently, immunosuppressive therapy has been also recognized as an effective treatment in virus-negative inflammatory cardiomyopathy. The aim of this review is to underline the role of immunomodulating and immunosuppressive therapies in patients with immune-mediated myocarditis and illustrate the different treatment strategies depending on the etiology. An endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of myocarditis as well as for a tailored treatment.

Cardiovascular implications of inflammatory bowel disease: An updated review

Emerging data highlights the heightened risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) in patients with chronic inflammatory disorders, particularly those afflicted with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This review delves into the epidemiological connections between IBD and ASCVD, elucidating potential underlying mechanisms. Furthermore, it discusses the impact of current IBD treatments on cardiovascular risk. Additionally, the cardiovascular adverse effects of novel small molecule drugs used in moderate-to-severe IBD are investigated, drawing parallels with observations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. This article aims to comprehensively evaluate the existing evidence supporting these associations. To achieve this, we conducted a meticulous search of PubMed, spanning from inception to August 2023, using a carefully selected set of keywords. The search encompassed topics related to IBD, such as Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, as well as ASCVD, including coronary artery disease, cardiovascular disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, conduction abnormalities, heart blocks, and premature coronary artery disease. This review encompasses various types of literature, including retrospective and prospective cohort studies, clinical trials, meta-analyses, and relevant guidelines, with the objective of providing a comprehensive overview of this critical intersection of inflammatory bowel disease and cardiovascular health.

Pathophysiological Gaps, Diagnostic Challenges, and Uncertainties in Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Cardiac sarcoidosis can mimic any cardiomyopathy in different stages. Noncaseating granulomatous inflammation can be missed, because of the nonhomogeneous distribution in the heart. The current diagnostic criteria show discrepancies and are partly nonspecific and insensitive. Besides the diagnostic pitfalls, there are controversies in the understanding of the causes, genetic and environmental background, and the natural evolution of the disease. Here, we review the current pathophysiological aspects and gaps that are relevant for future cardiac sarcoidosis diagnostics and research.

Immunosuppressive Therapy of Biopsy-Proven, Virus-Negative, Autoimmune/Immune-Mediated Myocarditis-Focus on Azathioprine: A Review of Existing Evidence and Future Perspectives

The use of immunosuppressive therapy (IT) in biopsy-proven, autoimmune/immune-mediated (AI), virus-negative myocarditis has become the standard of care. In particular, according to recent guidelines, azathioprine (AZA), in association with steroids, is a cornerstone of first-line therapy regimens. IT may have a crucial impact on the natural history of AI myocarditis, preventing its progression to end-stage heart failure, cardiovascular death, or heart transplantation, provided that strict appropriateness and safety criteria are observed. In particular, AZA treatment for AI virus-negative myocarditis requires the consideration of some crucial aspects regarding its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, as well as a high index of suspicion to detect its overt and/or subclinical side effects. Importantly, besides a tight teamwork with a clinical immunologist/immuno-rheumatologist, before starting IT, it is also necessary to carry out a careful "safety check-list" in order to rule out possible contraindications to IT and minimize patient's risk. The aim of this review is to describe the pharmacological properties of AZA, as well as to discuss practical aspects of its clinical use, in the light of existing evidence, with particular regard to the new field of cardioimmunology.

Myocarditis and endomyocardial biopsy: achieving consensus diagnosis on 100 cases

The two histopathology benchmarks used to diagnose myocarditis are the Dallas Criteria, developed in 1984 and the European Society of Cardiology criteria, developed in 2013, which added immunohistochemistry for the detection of CD3+ T cells (lymphocytes) and CD68+ macrophages. Despite their near universal acceptance, the extent to which pathologists use these criteria or their own criteria to consistently render the diagnosis of myocarditis on endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is unknown. We digitally scanned slides from 100 heart biopsies, including a trichrome stain and immunostaining, that were chosen as representative of myocarditis, non-myocarditis, and borderline myocarditis, as diagnosed per one institution's use of the Dallas Criteria. Eight blinded international cardiovascular experts were asked to render diagnoses and offer a confidence score on each case. No clinical histories were shared. There was full initial agreement across all experts on 37 cases (16 myocarditis and 21 non-myocarditis) and moderate consensus on 35 cases. After individual inquiries and group discussion, consensus was reached on 90 cases. Diagnostic confidence was highest among the myocarditis diagnoses, lowest for borderline cases, and significantly different between the three diagnostic categories (myocarditis, borderline myocarditis, non-myocarditis; P-value=8.49 × 10^-57; ANOVA). Diagnosing myocarditis, particularly in cases with limited inflammation and injury, remains a challenge even for experts in the field. Intermediate cases, termed "borderline" in the Dallas Criteria, represent those for which consensus is particularly hard to achieve. To increase consistency for the histopathologic diagnosis of myocarditis, we will need more specifically defined criteria, more granular descriptions of positive and negative features, clarity on how to incorporate immunohistochemistry findings, and improved nomenclature.

Identification of Pathogenic Immune Cell Subsets Associated With Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Myocarditis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are monoclonal antibodies used to activate the immune system against tumor cells. Despite therapeutic benefits, ICIs have the potential to cause immune-related adverse events such as myocarditis, a rare but serious side effect with up to 50% mortality in affected patients. Histologically, patients with ICI myocarditis have lymphocytic infiltrates in the heart, implicating T cell-mediated mechanisms. However, the precise pathological immune subsets and molecular changes in ICI myocarditis are unknown.

METHODS

To identify immune subset(s) associated with ICI myocarditis, we performed time-of-flight mass cytometry on peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 52 individuals: 29 patients with autoimmune adverse events (immune-related adverse events) on ICI, including 8 patients with ICI myocarditis, and 23 healthy control subjects. We also used multiomics single-cell technology to immunophenotype 30 patients/control subjects using single-cell RNA sequencing, single-cell T-cell receptor sequencing, and cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes by sequencing with feature barcoding for surface marker expression confirmation. To correlate between the blood and the heart, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing/T-cell receptor sequencing/cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes by sequencing on MRL/Pdcd1^-/- (Murphy Roths large/programmed death-1-deficient) mice with spontaneous myocarditis.

RESULTS

Using these complementary approaches, we found an expansion of cytotoxic CD8⁺ T effector cells re-expressing CD45RA (Temra CD8⁺ cells) in patients with ICI myocarditis compared with control subjects. T-cell receptor sequencing demonstrated that these CD8⁺ Temra cells were clonally expanded in patients with myocarditis compared with control subjects. Transcriptomic analysis of these Temra CD8⁺ clones confirmed a highly activated and cytotoxic phenotype. Longitudinal study demonstrated progression of these Temra CD8⁺ cells into an exhausted phenotype 2 months after treatment with glucocorticoids. Differential expression analysis demonstrated elevated expression levels of proinflammatory chemokines (CCL5/CCL4/CCL4L2) in the clonally expanded Temra CD8⁺ cells, and ligand receptor analysis demonstrated their interactions with innate immune cells, including monocytes/macrophages, dendritic cells, and neutrophils, as well as the absence of key anti-inflammatory signals. To complement the human study, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing/T-cell receptor sequencing/cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes by sequencing in Pdcd1^-/- mice with spontaneous myocarditis and found analogous expansions of cytotoxic clonal effector CD8⁺ cells in both blood and hearts of such mice compared with controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Clonal cytotoxic Temra CD8⁺ cells are significantly increased in the blood of patients with ICI myocarditis, corresponding to an analogous increase in effector cytotoxic CD8⁺ cells in the blood/hearts of Pdcd1^-/- mice with myocarditis. These expanded effector CD8⁺ cells have unique transcriptional changes, including upregulation of chemokines CCL5/CCL4/CCL4L2, which may serve as attractive diagnostic/therapeutic targets for reducing life-threatening cardiac immune-related adverse events in ICI-treated patients with cancer.

Personalized Management of Myocarditis and Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy in Clinical Practice

Myocarditis is an inflammatory heart disease induced by infectious and non-infectious causes frequently triggering immune-mediated pathologic mechanisms leading to myocardial damage and dysfunction. In approximately half of the patients, acute myocarditis resolves spontaneously while in the remaining cases, it may evolve into serious complications including inflammatory cardiomyopathy, arrhythmias, death, or heart transplantation. Due to the large variability in clinical presentation, unpredictable course of the disease, and lack of established causative treatment, myocarditis represents a challenging diagnosis in modern cardiology. Moreover, an increase in the incidence of myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy has been observed in recent years. However, there is a growing potential of available non-invasive diagnostic methods (biomarkers, serum anti-heart autoantibodies (AHA), microRNAs, speckle tracking echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance T1 and T2 tissue mapping, positron emission tomography), which may refine the diagnostic workup and/or noninvasive follow-up. Personalized management should include the use of endomyocardial biopsy and AHA, which may allow the etiopathogenetic subsets of myocarditis (infectious, non-infectious, and/or immune-mediated) to be distinguished and implementation of disease-specific therapies. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy, and outline some practical diagnostic, therapeutic, and follow-up algorithms to facilitate comprehensive individualized management of these patients.

Management of myocarditis in clinical practice

Myocarditis is an inflammatory heart muscle disease characterised by heterogeneous clinical presentation and outcome. Clinical heterogeneity of myocarditis, ranging from acute onset chest pain with electrocardiographic changes resembling an acute coronary syndrome, to arrhythmic storm and chronic decompensated heart failure, makes diagnosis challenging. A correct diagnosis is however key to proper patients' management and should always be aimed at. Although a definite diagnosis is only provided by endomyocardial biopsy, the European Society of Cardiology task force on myocardial and pericardial diseases provided specific criteria for the diagnosis of clinically suspected myocarditis, which has been facilitated by the advent of non invasive imaging tests (i.e. cardiovascular magnetic resonance based myocardial tissue characterization). Due to the heterogeneous presentation and disease course of myocarditis, a tailored treatment would be the best strategy, but a standardised management is still not available. Over the years, however, new, promising, therapies, such as anti-viral and immune-suppressive treatment, have come side by side to the standard pharmacological heart treatment, i.e. anti-heart failure medications. In this paper we will review the basic principles of myocarditis management in clinical practice, including diagnostic work-up, conventional and disease-specific therapy and patients' follow-up.