Determinants of outcomes following surgery for type A acute aortic dissection: the UK National Adult Cardiac Surgical Audit

Aortic arch surgery for DeBakey type 1 aortic dissection in patients aged 60 years or younger

BACKGROUND

Extended aortic repair is considered a key issue for the long-term durability of surgery for DeBakey type 1 aortic dissection. The risk of aortic degeneration may be higher in young patients due to their long life expectancy. The early outcome and durability of aortic surgery in these patients were investigated in the present study.

METHODS

The subjects of the present analysis were patients under 60 years old who underwent surgical repair for acute DeBakey type 1 aortic dissection at 18 cardiac surgery centres across Europe between 2005 and 2021. Patients underwent ascending aortic repair or total aortic arch repair using the conventional technique or the frozen elephant trunk technique. The primary outcome was 5-year cumulative incidence of reoperation on the distal aorta.

RESULTS

Overall, 915 patients underwent surgical ascending aortic repair and 284 patients underwent surgical total aortic arch repair. The frozen elephant trunk procedure was performed in 128 patients. Among 245 propensity score-matched pairs, total aortic arch repair did not decrease the rate of distal aortic reoperation compared to ascending aortic repair (5-year cumulative incidence, 6.7% versus 6.7%, subdistributional hazard ratio 1.127, 95% c.i. 0.523 to 2.427). Total aortic arch repair increased the incidence of postoperative stroke/global brain ischaemia (25.7% versus 18.4%, P = 0.050) and dialysis (19.6% versus 12.7%, P = 0.003). Five-year mortality was comparable after ascending aortic repair and total aortic arch repair (22.8% versus 27.3%, P = 0.172).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients under 60 years old with DeBakey type 1 aortic dissection, total aortic arch replacement compared with ascending aortic repair did not reduce the incidence of distal aortic operations at 5 years. When feasible, ascending aortic repair for DeBakey type 1 aortic dissection is associated with satisfactory early and mid-term outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04831073.

Study on risk factors and treatment strategies of hypoxemia after acute type a aortic dissection surgery

Acute type A aortic dissection is a life-threatening cardiovascular disease characterized by rapid onset and high mortality. Emergency surgery is the preferred and reliable treatment option. However, postoperative complications significantly impact patient prognosis. Hypoxemia, a common complication, poses challenges in clinical treatment, negatively affecting patient outcomes and increasing the risk of mortality. Therefore, it is crucial to study and comprehend the risk factors and treatment strategies for hypoxemia following acute type A aortic dissection to facilitate early intervention.

Classification of the Urgency of the Procedure and Outcome of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Surgery for type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is associated with a high risk of early mortality. The prognostic impact of a new classification of the urgency of the procedure was evaluated in this multicenter cohort study. Data on consecutive patients who underwent surgery for acute TAAD were retrospectively collected in the multicenter, retrospective European Registry of TAAD (ERTAAD). The rates of in-hospital mortality of 3,902 consecutive patients increased along with the ERTAAD procedure urgency grades: urgent procedure 10.0%, emergency procedure grade 1 13.3%, emergency procedure grade 2 22.1%, salvage procedure grade 1 45.6%, and salvage procedure grade 2 57.1% (p <0.0001). Preoperative arterial lactate correlated with the urgency grades. Inclusion of the ERTAAD procedure urgency classification significantly improved the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves of the regression model and the integrated discrimination indexes and the net reclassification indexes. The risk of postoperative stroke/global brain ischemia, mesenteric ischemia, lower limb ischemia, dialysis, and acute heart failure increased along with the urgency grades. In conclusion, the urgency of surgical repair of acute TAAD, which seems to have a significant impact on the risk of in-hospital mortality, may be useful to improve the stratification of the operative risk of these critically ill patients. This study showed that salvage surgery for TAAD is justified because half of the patients may survive to discharge.

Improvement of Early Outcomes in Type A Acute Aortic Syndrome After an Aorta Code Implementation

BACKGROUND

Reduction of variability through process reengineering can improve surgical results for patients with type A acute aortic syndrome. We compare short-term results before and after implementation of an Aorta Code for patients with type A acute aortic syndrome who underwent surgery.

METHODS

The Aorta Code was implemented in a 5-hospital healthcare network in 2019. This critical pathway was based on a simple diagnostic algorithm, ongoing training, immediate patient transfer, and treatment by an expert multidisciplinary team. We retrospectively compared all patients operated on in our center before (2005-2018) and after (January 2019 to February 2023) its implementation.

RESULTS

One hundred two and 70 patients underwent surgery in the precode and code periods, respectively. In the code period the number of patients operated on per year increased (from 7.3 to 16.8), and the median elapsed time until diagnosis (6.5 hours vs 4.2 hours), transfer (4 hours vs 2.2 hours), and operating room (2.7 hours vs 1.8 hours) were significantly shorter (P < .05). Aortic root repair and total arch replacement were more frequent (66.7% vs 82.9% [P = .003] and 20.6% vs 40% [P = .001]). Cardiopulmonary bypass and ischemia times were also shorter (179.7 minutes vs 148.2 minutes [P = .001] and 105 minutes vs 91.2 minutes [P = .022]). Incidence of prolonged mechanical ventilation (53.9% vs 34.3%, P = .011), major stroke (17.7% vs 7.1%, P = .047), and 30-day mortality (27.5% vs 7.1%, P = .001) decreased significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

An Aorta Code can be successfully implemented by using a standardized protocol within a hospital network. The number of cases increased; time to diagnosis, transfer, and operating room were reduced; and 30- day mortality significantly decreased.

Comparison of 4 mortality scores for surgical repair of type A aortic dissection: a multicentre external validation

OBJECTIVES

In the last decades, 4 different scores for the prediction of mortality following surgery for type A acute aortic dissection (TAAD) were proposed. We aimed to validate these scores in a large external multicentre cohort.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed patients who underwent surgery for TAAD between 2000 and 2020. Patients were enrolled from 10 centres from 2 European countries. Outcomes were the early (30-day and/or in-hospital) and 1-year mortality. Discrimination, calibration and observed/expected (O/E) ratio were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 1895 patients (31.7% females, mean age 63.72 ± 12.8 years) were included in the study. Thirty-day mortality and in-hospital mortality were 21.7% (n = 412) and 22.5% (n = 427) respectively. The German Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA) score shows to have the best discrimination [area under the curve (AUC) 0.671 and 0.672] in predicting as well the early and the 1-year mortality, followed by the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) model 1 (AUC 0.658 and 0.672), the Centofanti (AUC 0.645 and 0.66) and the UK aortic score (AUC 0.549 and 0.563). According to Hosmer-Lemeshow and Brier tests, the IRAD model I and GERAADA, respectively, were well calibrated for the early mortality, while the GERAADA and Centofanti for the 1-year mortality. The O/E analysis showed a marked underestimation for patients labelled as low-risk for UK aortic score and IRAD model I for both outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The GERAADA score showed the best performance in comparison with other scores. However, none of them achieved together a fair discrimination and a good calibration for predicting either the early or the 1-year mortality.

Biomarkers for Risk Stratification in Patients With Type A Acute Aortic Dissection

Type A acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a fatal disease and thus, accurate and objective risk stratification is essential. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of readily available and assessable biomarkers in patients with type A AAD. This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study. A total of 703 patients with type A AAD diagnosed using contrast-enhanced computed tomography were included. Therapeutic strategies were left to the physician's discretion in a real-world clinical setting. The prognostic value for in-hospital mortality was examined in 15 circulating biomarkers on admission, which are routinely available in clinical practice. Of the 703 patients, 126 (17.9%) died during the hospitalization. Of the 15 biomarkers, the multivariable analysis identified positive cardiac troponin, a low total bilirubin (T-Bil) level, and increased levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as significant predictors of in-hospital death. The receiver operating characteristics curve analysis showed that these 4 biomarkers had an independent additive prognostic value. With the cut-off values of T-Bil, BNP, and LDH, in combination with positive troponin, the increase in the number of positive biomarkers was progressively associated with higher in-hospital mortality from 1.3% to 9.8%, 20.5%, 36.4%, and 75.0% (p <0.001). In conclusion, in patients with type A AAD, positive cardiac troponin, a low T-Bil level, and increased levels of BNP and LDH on admission were related to higher in-hospital mortality, with an incremental prognostic value, suggesting that the readily available and assessable biomarkers can aid in decision-making in therapeutic strategies.

Baseline risk factors of in-hospital mortality after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection: an ERTAAD study

Background

Surgery for type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is associated with high risk of mortality. Current risk scoring methods have a limited predictive accuracy.

Methods

Subjects were patients who underwent surgery for acute TAAD at 18 European centers of cardiac surgery from the European Registry of Type A Aortic Dissection (ERTAAD).

Results

Out of 3,902 patients included in the ERTAAD, 2,477 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In the validation dataset (2,229 patients), the rate of in-hospital mortality was 18.4%. The rate of composite outcome (in-hospital death, stroke/global ischemia, dialysis, and/or acute heart failure) was 41.2%, and 10-year mortality rate was 47.0%. Logistic regression identified the following patient-related variables associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality [area under the curve (AUC), 0.755, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.729-0.780; Brier score 0.128]: age; estimated glomerular filtration rate; arterial lactate; iatrogenic dissection; left ventricular ejection fraction ≤50%; invasive mechanical ventilation; cardiopulmonary resuscitation immediately before surgery; and cerebral, mesenteric, and peripheral malperfusion. The estimated risk score was associated with an increased risk of composite outcome (AUC, 0.689, 95% CI, 0.667-0.711) and of late mortality [hazard ratio (HR), 1.035, 95% CI, 1.031-1.038; Harrell's C 0.702; Somer's D 0.403]. In the validation dataset (248 patients), the in-hospital mortality rate was 16.1%, the composite outcome rate was 41.5%, and the 10-year mortality rate was 49.1%. The estimated risk score was predictive of in-hospital mortality (AUC, 0.703, 95% CI, 0.613-0.793; Brier score 0.121; slope 0.905) and of composite outcome (AUC, 0.682, 95% CI, 0.614-0.749). The estimated risk score was predictive of late mortality (HR, 1.035, 95% CI, 1.031-1.038; Harrell's C 0.702; Somer's D 0.403), also when hospital deaths were excluded from the analysis (HR, 1.024, 95% CI, 1.018-1.031; Harrell's C 0.630; Somer's D 0.261).

Conclusions

The present analysis identified several baseline clinical risk factors, along with preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate and arterial lactate, which are predictive of in-hospital mortality and major postoperative adverse events after surgical repair of acute TAAD. These risk factors may be valuable components for risk adjustment in the evaluation of surgical and anesthesiological strategies aiming to improve the results of surgery for TAAD.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04831073.

Survival following acute type A aortic dissection: a multicenter study

Background

While surgery is almost always indicated for acute type A aortic dissections (ATAADs), the extent of surgery is often debated, with some surgeons preferring a conservative option and others preferring a more radical option This study aims to assess the outcome after surgery for ATAAD and the prognostic impact of surgical strategy (with vs. without aortic arch replacement).

Methods

Data was gathered between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2021 and retrospectively analyzed with multivariable logistic and Cox regression to ascertain risk factors and survival respectively.

Results

A total of 601 patients underwent type A aortic dissection repair across the recruiting centers with an operative mortality of 24.3% (146 patients) which was considerably linked with the clinical condition at presentation. In-hospital mortality was 23.1% for ascending and root replacement alone vs. 28.7% for arch involvement. Overall survival was 73.3% after the first year, 68.2% at 5 years, and 53.5% at 10 years. The median follow-up period was 2.5 years [interquartile range (IQR), 6.6 years]. Aortic arch replacements were more often carried out in younger patients and those without adverse clinical conditions, although outcomes for patients who underwent either surgical option were comparable throughout apart from a higher rate of cerebrovascular complications in the arch group (7.6% vs. 21.9%) (P=0.01).

Conclusions

Surgery for ATAAD still confers a relatively high mortality. In our study, there was a higher stroke rate associated with patients who underwent arch replacements at the time of dissection despite them being younger. The choice of repair with or without arch replacement should be individualized to the patient and the severity of clinical status presentation.

The Aortic Team Model and Collaborative Decision Pathways for the Management of Complex Aortic Disease: Clinical Practice Update From the Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Society of Cardiac Surgeons/Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery/Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology

Disease of the aortic arch, descending thoracic, or thoracoabdominal aorta necessitates dedicated expertise across medical, endovascular, and surgical specialties. Cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, and others have expertise and skills that aid in the management of patients with complex aortic disease. No specialty is uniformly expert in all aspects of required care. Because of this dispersion of expertise across specialties, an aortic team model approach to decision-making and treatment is advocated. A nonhierarchical partnership across specialties within an interdisciplinary aortic clinic ensures that all treatment options are considered and promotes shared decision-making between the patient and all aortic experts. Furthermore, regionalization of care for aortic disease of increased complexity assures that the breadth of treatment options is available and that favourable volume-outcome ratios for high-risk procedures are maintained. An awareness of best practice care pathways for patient referrals for preventative management, acute care scenarios, chronic care scenarios, and pregnancy might facilitate a more organized management schema for aortic disease across Canada and improve lifelong surveillance initiatives.

Type A aortic dissection: optimal annual case volume for surgery

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The current study proposes a novel volume-outcome (V-O) meta-analytical approach to determine the optimal annual hospital case volume threshold for cardiovascular interventions in need of centralization. This novel method is applied to surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) as an illustrative example.

METHODS

A systematic search was applied to three electronic databases (1 January 2012 to 29 March 2023). The primary outcome was early mortality in relation to annual hospital case volume. Data were presented by volume quartiles (Qs). Restricted cubic splines were used to demonstrate the V-O relation, and the elbow method was applied to determine the optimal case volume. For clinical interpretation, numbers needed to treat (NNTs) were calculated.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty studies were included, comprising 38 276 patients. A significant non-linear V-O effect was observed (P < .001), with a notable between-quartile difference in early mortality rate [10.3% (Q4) vs. 16.2% (Q1)]. The optimal annual case volume was determined at 38 cases/year [95% confidence interval (CI) 37-40 cases/year, NNT to save a life in a centre with the optimal volume vs. 10 cases/year = 21]. More pronounced between-quartile survival differences were observed for long-term survival [10-year survival (Q4) 69% vs. (Q1) 51%, P < .01, adjusted hazard ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.91 per quartile, NNT to save a life in a high-volume (Q4) vs. low-volume centre (Q1) = 6].

CONCLUSIONS

Using this novel approach, the optimal hospital case volume threshold was statistically determined. Centralization of ATAAD care to high-volume centres may lead to improved outcomes. This method can be applied to various other cardiovascular procedures requiring centralization.

Preoperative arterial lactate and outcome after surgery for type A aortic dissection: The ERTAAD multicenter study

Background

Acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. In this study we evaluated the prognostic significance of preoperative arterial lactate concentration on the outcome after surgery for TAAD.

Methods

The ERTAAD registry included consecutive patients who underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD) at 18 European centers of cardiac surgery.

Results

Data on arterial lactate concentration immediately before surgery were available in 2798 (71.7 %) patients. Preoperative concentration of arterial lactate was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (mean, 3.5 ± 3.2 vs 2.1 ± 1.8 mmol/L, adjusted OR 1.181, 95%CI 1.129-1.235). The best cutoff value preoperative arterial lactate concentration was 1.8 mmol/L (in-hospital mortality, 12.0 %, vs. 26.6 %, p < 0.0001). The rates of in-hospital mortality increased along increasing quintiles of arterial lactate and it was 12.1 % in the lowest quintile and 33.6 % in the highest quintile (p < 0.0001). The difference between multivariable models with and without preoperative arterial lactate was statistically significant (p = 0.0002). The NRI was 0.296 (95%CI 0.200-0.391) (p < 0.0001) with -17 % of events correctly reclassified (p = 0.0002) and 46 % of non-events correctly reclassified (p < 0.0001). The IDI was 0.025 (95%CI 0.016-0.034) (p < 0.0001). Six studies from a systematic review plus the present one provided data for a pooled analysis which showed that the mean difference of preoperative arterial lactate between 30-day/in-hospital deaths and survivors was 1.85 mmol/L (95%CI 1.22-2.47, p < 0.0001, I2 64 %).

Conclusions

Hyperlactatemia significantly increased the risk of mortality after surgery for acute TAAD and should be considered in the clinical assessment of these critically ill patients.

Impact of Hospital Teaching Status in Type A Aortic Dissections: An Analysis of More Than 37 000 Patients

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of a hospital's teaching status on survival and outcomes of patients presenting with type A aortic dissections imperative for enhancing patient care.

METHODS

The National Readmission Database was used to review all type A aortic dissections between 2010 and 2017. Provided sampling weights were used to generate national estimates, and baseline variables were compared with descriptive statistics. Mixed effects and logistic models were created for 30-day and 90-day readmission and inhospital mortality.

RESULTS

In all, 37 396 type A aortic dissections were identified, the majority of which (83%) were operated on at a teaching hospital. Inhospital mortality was higher at nonteaching hospitals A (20.3% vs 14.42%, P < .001). Median hospital charge was higher at teaching hospitals ($59 670 vs $53 220, P < .001). There was a higher rate of 30-day readmission in teaching hospitals (20.95% vs 19.36%, P = .02). On logistic regression for mortality, hospital teaching status was a significant protective factor (odds ratio 0.83, P < .001). On mixed effects logistic regression, hospital teaching status was not significant for readmissions.

CONCLUSIONS

Type A aortic dissections continue to be primarily managed by teaching hospitals, with superior outcomes continuing to come from teaching hospitals. Given the substantial proportion of patients presenting out of state, investigations into optimal patient transfer and postoperative monitoring and referral could improve care.

Current Outcome after Surgery for Type A Aortic Dissection

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of different surgical strategies for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The optimal extent of aortic resection during surgery for acute TAAD is controversial.

METHODS

This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent surgery for acute TAAD at 18 European hospitals.

RESULTS

Out of 3902 consecutive patients, 689 (17.7%) died during the index hospitalization. Among 2855 patients who survived 3 months after surgery, 10-year observed survival was 65.3%, while country-adjusted, age-adjusted, and sex-adjusted expected survival was 81.3%, yielding a relative survival of 80.4%. Among 558 propensity score-matched pairs, total aortic arch replacement increased the risk of in-hospital (21.0% vs. 14.9%, P =0.008) and 10-year mortality (47.1% vs. 40.1%, P =0.001), without decreasing the incidence of distal aortic reoperation (10-year: 8.9% vs. 7.4%, P =0.690) compared with ascending aortic replacement. Among 933 propensity score-matched pairs, in-hospital mortality (18.5% vs. 18.0%, P =0.765), late mortality (at 10-year: 44.6% vs. 41.9%, P =0.824), and cumulative incidence of proximal aortic reoperation (at 10-year: 4.4% vs. 5.9%, P =0.190) after aortic root replacement was comparable to supracoronary aortic replacement.

CONCLUSIONS

Replacement of the aortic root and aortic arch did not decrease the risk of aortic reoperation in patients with TAAD and should be performed only in the presence of local aortic injury or aneurysm. The relative survival of TAAD patients is poor and suggests that the causes underlying aortic dissection may also impact late mortality despite surgical repair of the dissected aorta.

Influence of Impaired Hydration Status on Postoperative in-Hospital Death in Patients with Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Background

The hydration state of the body is getting more and more attention from researchers. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between impaired hydration status and postoperative hospitalization death in patients with A AAD.

Methods

From January 2019 to October 2021, the clinical data of 299 patients undergoing A AAD surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into normal hydration group, imminent dehydration group and current dehydration group according to the dehydration standard at admission. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine the independent risk factors for in-hospital death of patients with A AAD.

Results

Postoperative in-hospital death in A AAD patients was significantly more common in the imminent and current dehydration groups (>295mmol/L) (26.7% vs 11.9%; P=0.001). The length of ICU stay was significantly longer in the impending and current dehydration groups (P<0.05). After controlling for other factors by multivariate logistic regression analysis, the results showed that the group of impending and current dehydration (>295) (OR=3.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.61-8.06; P=0.002), CRRT (OR=10.55, 95%[CI]: 3.59-31.01; P<0.001), lactic acid (OR=1.25, 95%[CI]: 1.13-1.38; P<0.001), CAD (OR=5.27, 95%[CI]: 1.12-24.80; P=0.035) was an independent risk factor for in-hospital death in A AAD patients. Albumin (OR=0.92, 95%[CI]: 0.85-0.99; P=0.040) is a protective factor.

Conclusion

The presence of high serum osmotic pressure on admission of A AAD patients can independently predict postoperative death, and the impaired body hydration status should be paid attention to.

Current Knowledge on the Interaction of Human Cytomegalovirus Infection, Encoded miRNAs, and Acute Aortic Syndrome

Aortic dissection is a clinicopathological entity caused by rupture of the intima, leading to a high mortality if not treated. Over time, diagnostic and investigative methods, antihypertensive therapy, and early referrals have resulted in improved outcomes according to registry data. Some data have also emerged from recent studies suggesting a link between Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection and aortic dissection. Furthermore, the use of microRNAs has also become increasingly widespread in the literature. These have been noted to play a role in aortic dissections with elevated levels noted in studies as early as 2017. This review aims to provide a broad and holistic overview of the role of miRNAs, while studying the role of HCMV infection in the context of aortic dissections. The roles of long non-coding RNAs, circular RNAs, and microRNAs are explored to identify changes in expression during aortic dissections. The use of such biomarkers may one day be translated into clinical practice to allow early detection and prognostication of outcomes and drive preventative and therapeutic options in the future.

Lactate-Based Difference as a Determinant of Outcomes following Surgery for Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: A Multi-Centre Study

Type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD) is a serious condition within the acute aortic syndromes that demands immediate treatment. Despite advancements in diagnostic and referral pathways, the survival rate post-surgery currently sits at almost 20%. Our objective was to pinpoint clinical indicators for mortality and morbidity, particularly raised arterial lactate as a key factor for negative outcomes.

METHODS

All patients referred to the three cardiovascular centres between January 2005 and December 2022 were included in the study. The inclusion criteria required the presence of a lesion involving the ascending aorta, symptoms within 7 days of surgery, and referral for primary surgical repair of TAAAD based on recommendations, with consideration for other concomitant major cardiac surgical procedures needed during TAAAD and retrograde extension of TAAAD. We conducted an analysis of both continuous and categorical variables and utilised predictive mean matching to fill in missing numeric features. For missing binary variables, we used logistic regression to impute values. We specifically targeted early postoperative mortality and employed LASSO regression to minimise potential collinearity of over-fitting variables and variables measured from the same patient.

RESULTS

A total of 633 patients were recruited for the study, out of which 449 patients had complete preoperative arterial lactate data. The average age of the patients was 64 years, and 304 patients were male (67.6%). The crude early postoperative mortality rate was 24.5% (110 out of 449 patients). The mortality rate did not show any significant difference when comparing conservative and extensive surgeries. However, malperfusion had a significant impact on mortality [48/131 (36.6%) vs. 62/318 (19.5%), p < 0.001]. Preoperative arterial lactates were significantly elevated in patients with malperfusion. The optimal prognostic threshold of arterial lactate for predicting early postoperative mortality in our cohort was ≥2.6 mmol/L.

CONCLUSION

The arterial lactate concentration in patients referred for TAAAD is an independent factor for both operative mortality and postoperative complications. In addition to mortality, patients with an upper arterial lactate cut-off of ≥2.6 mmol/L face significant risks of VA ECMO and the need for dialysis within the first 48 h after surgery. To improve recognition and facilitate rapid transfer and surgical treatment protocol, more diligent efforts are required in the management of malperfusion in TAAAD.

The blood glucose-potassium ratio at admission predicts in-hospital mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection

Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a serious cardiovascular emergency with high risk and mortality after surgery. Recent studies have shown that serum glucose-potassium ratio (GPR) is associated with the prognosis of cerebrovascular diseases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between GPR and in-hospital mortality in patients with ATAAD. From June 2019 to August 2021, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 272 patients who underwent ATAAD surgery. According to the median value of GPR (1.74), the patients were divided into two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine the risk factors of in-hospital mortality after ATAAD. In-hospital death was significantly more common in the high GPR group (> 1.74) (24.4% vs 13.9%; P = 0.027). The incidence of renal dysfunction in the low GPR group was significantly higher than that in the high GPR group (26.3% vs 14.8%: P = 0.019). After controlling for potential confounding variables and adjusting for multivariate logistic regression analysis, the results showed a high GPR (> 1.74) (AOR 4.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.13-10.40; P =  < 0.001), lactic acid (AOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.26; P = 0.009), smokers (AOR 2.45, 95% CI 1.18-15.07; P = 0.039), mechanical ventilation (AOR 9.47, 95% CI 4.00-22.38; P =  < 0.001) was independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality in ATAAD patients, albumin (AOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.98; P = 0.014) was a protective factor for in-hospital prognosis. High GPR is a good predictor of in-hospital mortality after ATAAD surgery.

Proximal vs Extensive Repair in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery

BACKGROUND

This purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of proximal vs extensive repair on mortality and how this impact is influenced by patient characteristics.

METHODS

Of 5510 patients with acute type A aortic dissection from 13 Chinese hospitals (2016-2021) categorized by proximal vs extensive repair, 4038 patients were used for for model derivation using eXtreme gradient boosting and 1472 patients for model validation.

RESULTS

Operative mortality of extensive repair was higher than proximal repair (10.4% vs 2.9%; odd ratio [OR], 3.833; 95% CI, 2.810-5.229; P < .001) with a number needed to harm of 15 (95% CI, 13-19). Seven top features of importance were selected to develop an alphabet risk model (age, body mass index, platelet-to-leucocyte ratio, albumin, hemoglobin, serum creatinine, and preoperative malperfusion), with an area under the curve of 0.767 (95% CI, 0.733-0.800) and 0.727 (95% CI, 0.689-0.764) in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. The absolute rate differences in mortality between the 2 repair strategies increased progressively as predicted risk rose; however it did not become statistically significant until the predicted risk exceeded 4.5%. Extensive repair was associated with similar risk of mortality (OR, 2.540; 95% CI, 0.944-6.831) for patients with a risk probability < 4.5% but higher risk (OR, 2.164; 95% CI, 1.679-2.788) for patients with a risk probability > 4.5% compared with proximal repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive repair is associated with higher mortality than proximal repair; however it did not carry a significantly higher risk of mortality until the predicted probability exceeded a certain threshold. Choosing the right surgery should be based on individualized risk prediction and treatment effect. (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT04918108.).

Interinstitutional analysis of the outcome after surgery for type A aortic dissection

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of individual institutions on the outcome after surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD).

METHODS

This is an observational, multicenter, retrospective cohort study including 3902 patients who underwent surgery for TAAD at 18 university and non-university hospitals.

RESULTS

Logistic regression showed that four hospitals had increased risk of in-hospital mortality, while two hospitals were associated with decreased risk of in-hospital mortality. Risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality rates were lower in four hospitals and higher in other four hospitals compared to the overall in-hospital mortality rate (17.7%). Participating hospitals were classified as overperforming or underperforming if their risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality rate was lower or higher than the in-hospital mortality rate of the overall series, respectively. Propensity score matching yielded 1729 pairs of patients operated at over- or underperforming hospitals. Overperforming hospitals had a significantly lower in-hospital mortality (12.8% vs. 22.2%, p < 0.0001) along with decreased rate of stroke and/or global brain ischemia (16.5% vs. 19.9%, p = 0.009) compared to underperforming hospitals. Aggregate data meta-regression of the results of participating hospitals showed that hospital volume was inversely associated with in-hospital mortality (p = 0.043). Hospitals with an annual volume of less than 15 cases had an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR, 1.345, 95% CI 1.126-1.607).

CONCLUSION

The present findings indicate that there are significant differences between hospitals in terms of early outcome after surgery for TAAD. Low hospital volume may be a determinant of poor outcome of TAAD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04831073.

Surgical Strategy for the Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Multicenter Study

Type A acute aortic dissection is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with prompt referral imaging and management to tertiary referral centers needed urgently. Surgery is usually needed emergently, but the choice of surgery often varies depending on the patient and the presentation. Staff and center expertise also play a major role in determining the surgical strategy employed. The aim of this study was to compare the early- and medium-term outcomes of patients undergoing a conservative approach extended only to the ascending aorta and the hemiarch to those of patients subjected to extensive surgery (total arch reconstruction and root replacement) across three European referral centers. A retrospective study was conducted across three sites between January 2008 and December 2021. In total, 601 patients were included within the study, of which 30% were female, and the median age was 64.4 years. The most common operation was ascending aorta replacement (n = 246, 40.9%). The aortic repair was extended proximally (i.e., root n = 105; 17.5%) and distally (i.e., arch n = 250; 41.6%). A more extensive approach, extending from the root to the arch, was employed in 24 patients (4.0%). Operative mortality occurred in 146 patients (24.3%), and the most common morbidity was stroke (75, 12.6%). An increased length of ICU admission was noted in the extensive surgery group, which comprised younger and more frequently male patients. No significant differences were noted in surgical mortality between patients managed with extensive surgery and those managed conservatively. However, age, arterial lactate levels, "intubated/sedated" status on arrival, and "emergency or salvage" status at presentation were independent predictors of mortality both within the index hospitalization and during the follow-up. The overall survival was similar between the groups.

Sex-Based Difference in Aortic Dissection Outcomes: A Multicenter Study

Background: Type A Acute Aortic Dissection (TAAAD) repair is a surgical emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality. Registry data have noted several sex-specific differences in presentation with TAAAD which may account for the differences in men and women undergoing surgery for this condition. Methods: A retrospective review of data from three departments of cardiac surgery (Centre Cardiologique du Nord, Henri-Mondor University Hospital, San Martino University Hospital, Genoa) between January 2005 and 31 December 2021 was conducted. Confounders were adjusted using doubly robust regression models, a combination of regression models with inverse probability treatment weighting by propensity score. Results: 633 patients were included in the study, of which 192 (30.3%) were women. Women were significantly older with reduced haemoglobin levels and pre-operative estimated glomerular filtration rate compared to men. Male patients were more likely to undergo aortic root replacement and partial or total arch repair. Operative mortality (OR 0.745, 95% CI: 0.491–1.130) and early postoperative neurological complication results were comparable between the groups. The adjusted survival curves using IPTW by propensity score confirmed the absence of a significant impact of gender on long-term survival (HR 0.883, 95% CI 0.561–1.198). In a subgroup analysis of women, preoperative levels of arterial lactate (OR 1.468, 95% CI: 1.133–1.901) and mesenteric ischemia after surgery (OR 32.742, 95% CI: 3.361–319.017) were significantly associated with increased operative mortality. Conclusions: The advancing age of female patients alongside raised preoperative level of arterial lactate may account for the increasing preponderance among surgeons to perform more conservative surgery compared to their younger male counterparts although postoperative survival was similar between the groups.

Acute aortic dissection

Although substantial progress has been made in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of acute aortic dissection, it remains a complex cardiovascular event, with a high immediate mortality and substantial morbidity in individuals surviving the acute period. The past decade has allowed a leap forward in understanding the pathophysiology of this disease; the existing classifications have been challenged, and the scientific community moves towards a nomenclature that is likely to unify the current definitions according to morphology and function. The most important pathophysiological pathway, namely the location and extension of the initial intimal tear, which causes a disruption of the media layer of the aortic wall, together with the size of the affected aortic segments, determines whether the patient should undergo emergency surgery, an endovascular intervention, or receive optimal medical treatment. The scientific evidence for the management and follow-up of acute aortic dissection continues to evolve. This Seminar provides a clinically relevant overview of potential prevention, diagnosis, and management of acute aortic dissection, which is the most severe acute aortic syndrome.

S100B predicts neurological injury and 30-day mortality following surgery for acute type A aortic dissection: an observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Neurological injuries are frequent following Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (ATAAD) repair occurring in 4-30% of all patients. Our objective was to study whether S100B can predict neurological injury following ATAAD repair.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. The study included all patients that underwent ATAAD repair at our institution between Jan 1998 and Dec 2021 and had recorded S100B-values. The primary outcome measure was neurological injury, defined as focal neurological deficit or coma diagnosed by clinical assessment with or without radiological confirmation and with a symptom duration of more than 24 h. Secondary outcome measure was 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

538 patients underwent surgery during the study period and 393 patients, had recorded S100B-values. The patients had a mean age of 64.4 ± 11.1 years and 34% were female. Receiver operating characteristic curve for S100B 24 h postoperatively yielded area under the curve 0.687 (95% CI 0.615-0.759) and best Youden's index corresponded to S100B 0.225 which gave a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 75%. Multivariable logistic regression identified S100B ≥ 0.23 μg/l at 24 h as an independent predictor for neurological injury (OR 4.71, 95% CI 2.59-8.57; p < 0.01) along with preoperative cerebral malperfusion (OR 4.23, 95% CI 2.03-8.84; p < 0.01) as well as an independent predictor for 30-day mortality (OR 4.57, 95% CI 1.18-11.70; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that S100B, 24 h after surgery is a strong independent predictor for neurological injury and 30-day mortality after ATAAD repair.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

As this was a retrospective observational study it was not registered.

Perioperative Risk Factors for Post-operative Pneumonia after Type A Acute Aortic Dissection Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD) is a dangerous and complicated condition with a high death rate before hospital treatment. Patients who are fortunate to receive prompt surgical treatment still face high in-hospital mortality. A series of post-operative complications further affects the prognosis. Post-operative pneumonia (POP) also leads to great morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to identify the prevalence as well as the risk factors for POP in TAAAD patients and offer references for clinical decisions to further improve the prognosis of patients who survived the surgical procedure.

METHODS

The study enrolled 89 TAAAD patients who underwent surgical treatment in Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei province, China from December 2020 to July 2021 and analyzed the perioperative data and outcomes of these patients. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify the risk factors for POP.

RESULTS

In the study, 31.5% of patients developed POP. Patients with POP had higher proportions of severe oxygenation damage, pneumothorax, reintubation, tracheotomy, renal replacement therapy, arrhythmia, gastrointestinal bleeding, and longer duration of mechanical ventilation, fever, ICU stay, and length of stay (all with P<0.05). The in-hospital mortality was 2.3%. Smoking, preoperative white blood cells, and intraoperative transfusion were the independent risk factors for POP in TAAAD.

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent TAAAD surgery suffered poorer outcomes when they developed POP. Furthermore, patients with risk factors should be treated with caution.

Right versus left coronary artery involvement in patients with type A acute aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

Type A acute aortic dissection (AAD) complicated by coronary malperfusion is a life-threatening disease. In the present study, we compared the clinical characteristics and prognostic impact of treatment strategies including surgical treatment and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in type A AAD patients with RCA and LCA involvement.

METHODS

This multicenter registry included 220 patients with type A AAD and either RCA or LCA involvement. Treatment strategies were left to treating physicians. The primary endpoint was in-hospital death.

RESULTS

Of 220 patients, 115 (52.3%) and 105 (47.7%) had RCA and LCA involvement. Patients with LCA involvement were more1 likely to present with Killip class IV on admission than those with RCA involvement. Coronary angiography was performed in 52 of 220 (23.6%) patients, among whom 39 (75.0%) underwent subsequent PCI. During the hospitalization, 93 (42.3%) patients died. Patients with LCA involvement had an increased risk of in-hospital mortality compared to those with RCA involvement (54.3% vs. 31.3%, p < 0.001). In patients with RCA involvement, multivariable analysis identified Killip class IV and no surgical treatment as predictors of in-hospital death, while PCI and surgical treatment were indicated as factors associated with lower in-hospital mortality in patients with LCA involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

The rates of RCA and LCA involvement were similar in type A AAD. Immediate PCI as a bridge to subsequent surgical treatment might improve survival in patients with type A AAD complicated by coronary malperfusion, especially in those with LCA involvement.

Safety and efficacy of fibrinogen concentrate in aortic arch surgery involving moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest

OBJECTIVE

Bleeding is a common complication of cardiac surgery, especially aortic arch surgery involving moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest. Fibrinogen concentrate has been increasingly used to treat coagulopathic bleeding in cardiac surgery, although its effectiveness and safety are unknown. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of fibrinogen concentrate in patients with acute type A aortic dissection.

METHODS

From July 2020 to August 2021, 84 patients with acute type A aortic dissection who underwent emergency aortic arch surgery involving MHCA and whose intraoperative fibrinogen level was less than 1.5 g/L were included in this study. Fifty-four patients who were supplemented with fibrinogen concentrate were included in the FC treatment group. Thirty patients were included in the non-FC treatment group. The primary endpoints included the required volumes of individual allogeneic blood products (RBCs, FFP, and PC), volumes of cumulative drainage within 24 and 48 h, and total volumes after infusion of FC, as well as reoperation rates due to bleeding. The secondary endpoint for the study was the incidence of serious adverse events from the infusion of FC to day 45. The serious adverse events defined for the evaluation of the safety of FC were death, pulmonary embolism and other thromboembolic or ischaemic events. The clinical data, routine laboratory tests and plasma fibrinogen levels were obtained at 5 time points.

RESULTS

We observed rapid increases in the plasma fibrinogen level and subsequent improvement in haemostasis after the administration of fibrinogen concentrate. The mean fibrinogen level increased from 1.36 ± 0.75 g/L to 2.91 ± 0.76 g/L in the fibrinogen concentrate treatment group. The patients in the fibrinogen concentrate treatment group demonstrated lower volumes of cumulative postoperative drainage and transfused allogeneic blood products than the nonfibrinogen concentrate treatment group. There were no serious adverse events in the fibrinogen concentrate treatment group during hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Fibrinogen concentrate was effective at increasing the plasma fibrinogen level and significantly reduced the volumes of transfused allogeneic blood products and blood loss in patients with aortic arch surgery. There were no serious adverse events in the patients who received fibrinogen concentrate treatment.

PERSPECTIVE STATE

The safety and efficacy of fibrinogen concentrate were investigated in acute type A aortic dissection patients with aortic arch surgery. Fibrinogen concentrate was effective at increasing the plasma fibrinogen level and significantly reduced the volumes of transfused allogeneic blood products and blood loss; there were no serious adverse events in the patients who received fibrinogen concentrate treatment.

A Novel Inflammation-Based Risk Score Predicts Mortality in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery: The Additive Anti-inflammatory Action for Aortopathy and Arteriopathy Score

OBJECTIVE

To develop an inflammation-based risk stratification tool for operative mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection.

METHODS

Between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2021, 3124 patients from Beijing Anzhen Hospital were included for derivation, 571 patients from the same hospital were included for internal validation, and 1319 patients from other 12 hospitals were included for external validation. The primary outcome was operative mortality according to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons criteria. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression were used to identify clinical risk factors. A model was developed using different machine learning algorithms. The performance of the model was determined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for discrimination, calibration curves, and Brier score for calibration. The final model (5A score) was tested with respect to the existing clinical scores.

RESULTS

Extreme gradient boosting was selected for model training (5A score) using 12 variables for prediction-the ratio of platelet to leukocyte count, creatinine level, age, hemoglobin level, prior cardiac surgery, extent of dissection extension, cerebral perfusion, aortic regurgitation, sex, pericardial effusion, shock, and coronary perfusion-which yields the highest AUC (0.873 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.845-0.901]). The AUC of 5A score was 0.875 (95% CI 0.814-0.936), 0.845 (95% CI 0.811-0.878), and 0.852 (95% CI 0.821-0.883) in the internal, external, and total cohort, respectively, which outperformed the best existing risk score (German Registry for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection score AUC 0.709 [95% CI 0.669-0.749]).

CONCLUSION

The 5A score is a novel, internally and externally validated inflammation-based tool for risk stratification of patients before surgical repair, potentially advancing individualized treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04918108.

Circulating biomarker-based risk stratifications individualize arch repair strategy of acute Type A aortic dissection via the XGBoosting algorithm

Aims

The incremental usefulness of circulating biomarkers from different pathological pathways for predicting mortality has not been evaluated in acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) patients. We aim to develop a risk prediction model and investigate the impact of arch repair strategy on mortality based on distinct risk stratifications.

Methods and results

A total of 3771 ATAAD patients who underwent aortic surgery retrospectively included were randomly divided into training and testing cohorts at a ratio of 7:3 for the development and validation of the risk model based on multiple circulating biomarkers and conventional clinical factors. Extreme gradient boosting was used to generate the risk models. Subgroup analyses were performed by risk stratifications (low vs. middle-high risk) and arch repair strategies (proximal vs. extensive arch repair). Addition of multiple biomarkers to a model with conventional factors fitted an ABC risk model consisting of platelet-leucocyte ratio, mean arterial pressure, albumin, age, creatinine, creatine kinase-MB, haemoglobin, lactate, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, urea nitrogen, and aspartate aminotransferase, with adequate discrimination ability {area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC): 0.930 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.906-0.954] and 0.954, 95% CI (0.930-0.977) in the derivation and validation cohort, respectively}. Compared with proximal arch repair, the extensive repair was associated with similar mortality risk among patients at low risk [odds ratio (OR) 1.838, 95% CI (0.559-6.038); P = 0.316], but associated with higher mortality risk among patients at middle-high risk [OR 2.007, 95% CI (1.460-2.757); P < 0.0001].

Conclusion

In ATAAD patients, the simultaneous addition of circulating biomarkers of inflammatory, cardiac, hepatic, renal, and metabolic abnormalities substantially improved risk stratification and individualized arch repair strategy.

Prognostic Impact of Systemic Coagulation-Inflammation Index in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery

BACKGROUND

A novel hematologic parameter, systemic coagulation-inflammation (SCI) index reflecting inflammation and coagulation pathways could be easily obtained from clinically routine laboratory findings. We hypothesize that the SCI index has prognostic implication in predicting operative mortality for patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD).

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate the prognostic value of the SCI index and to establish an SCI-adding nomogram for mortality prediction in ATAAD patients.

METHODS

A total of 1,967 ATAAD patients surgically repaired were collected from 12 Chinese cardiovascular centers by the 5A (Additive Anti-inflammatory Action for Aortopathy & Arteriopathy [Multicenter Retrospective Study]) study III (2016-2020). SCI index was calculated as platelet count × fibrinogen/white blood cell count on admission. By adding SCI index, a nomogram was developed and evaluated for 90-day mortality prediction with conventional predictors via the Cox model with 10-fold cross-validation.

RESULTS

Patients were stratified with low SCI (<40), middle SCI (40-100), or high SCI (>100). The 90-day survival rates increased with SCI index (low 86.9%; [95% CI: 84.9%-89.0%], middle 92.7% [95% CI: 90.9%-94.9%], and high 96.4% [95% CI: 94.2%-98.6%]; log-rank P < 0.001). SCI index is independently associated with 90-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.549; 95% CI: 0.424-0.710; P < 0.001). The addition of SCI index provided significantly incremental prognostic value to base model including age, serum creatinine, DeBakey class, and location of intimal entry (area under the curve: 0.677; 95% CI: 0.641-0.716 vs 0.724; 95% CI: 0.685-0.760; P = 0.002), which was confirmed by net reclassification improvement index (0.158; 95% CI: 0.065-0.235; P < 0.001) and integrated discrimination improvement index (0.070; 95% CI: 0.007-0.036; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SCI index is easily obtainable, performs moderately well as a predictor of short-term mortality in ATAAD patients, and may be useful for risk stratification in emergency settings. (Additive Anti-inflammatory Action for Aortopathy & Arteriopathy [Multicenter Retrospective Study] III NCT04918108).

Targeted Inhibition of Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 Prevents Aortic Dissection in a Murine Model

Aortic dissection (AD) is a lethal aortic pathology without effective medical treatments since the underlying pathological mechanisms responsible for AD remain elusive. Matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP8) has been previously identified as a key player in atherosclerosis and arterial remodeling. However, the functional role of MMP8 in AD remains largely unknown. Here, we report that an increased level of MMP8 was observed in 3-aminopropionitrile fumarate (BAPN)-induced murine AD. AD incidence and aortic elastin fragmentation were markedly reduced in MMP8-knockout mice. Importantly, pharmacologic inhibition of MMP8 significantly reduced the AD incidence and aortic elastin fragmentation. We observed less inflammatory cell accumulation, a lower level of aortic inflammation, and decreased smooth muscle cell (SMC) apoptosis in MMP8-knockout mice. In line with our previous observation that MMP8 cleaves Ang I to generate Ang II, BAPN-treated MMP8-knockout mice had increased levels of Ang I, but decreased levels of Ang II and lower blood pressure. Additionally, we observed a decreased expression level of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM1) and a reduced level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in MMP8-knockout aortas. Mechanistically, our data show that the Ang II/VCAM1 signal axis is responsible for MMP8-mediated inflammatory cell invasion and transendothelial migration, while MMP8-mediated SMC inflammation and apoptosis are attributed to Ang II/ROS signaling. Finally, we observed higher levels of aortic and serum MMP8 in patients with AD. We therefore provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying AD and identify MMP8 as a potential therapeutic target for this life-threatening aortic disease.

Hyperbilirubinemia after surgical repair for acute type a aortic dissection: A propensity score-matched analysis

Background: Inflammation and oxidative stress are known to participate in the pathogenesis of hyperbilirubinemia. It has been known that acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) surgical repair often associates with complications which might affect the long-term prognosis. However, the clinical significance of postoperative hyperbilirubinemia (PH) has not been evaluated. Here in this study, we examined the incidence, risk factors, and prognosis of PH after ATAAD surgery.

Methods: This retrospective study enrolled a total of 970 patients who received ATAAD surgical repair from January 2014 to December 2019. PH was defined as serum total bilirubin >3.0 mg/dl within the first week after the surgery. Propensity score matching was used to reduce selection bias and eliminate potential confounding factors. Kaplan–Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were conducted to explore the association between PH and postoperative long-term survival.

Results: Development of PH (183 patients) was associated with a higher 30-Day mortality (20.8% vs. 9.0%, p < 0.001). Advanced age [odds ratio (OR) 1.538, p = 0.006], higher baseline total bilirubin level (OR 1.735, p = 0.026), preoperative pericardial tamponade (OR 3.192, p = 0.024), prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) duration (OR 2.008, p = 0.005), and elevated postoperative central venous pressure (CVP) level (OR 2.183, p < 0.001) were associated with PH. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed patients who developed PH were associated with poor long-term survival (p = 0.044). Cox analysis showed that the presence of PH (hazard ratio 2.006, p = 0.003) was an independent risk factor for increased mortality.

Conclusion: PH is a common complication in patients undergoing ATAAD surgical repair that associates with worse short- and long-term prognosis. Our data indicated that age, preoperative total bilirubin level, pericardial tamponade, CPB duration, and postoperative CVP level were risk factors for the development of PH.

Aortic wrapping is life-saving in high-risk acute aortic dissection and intramural haematoma

Aortic wrapping is a controversial repair in patients presenting with acute type A aortic dissection or intramural haematoma, but this method may be a potential alternative to medical treatment or conventional repair in patients aged >80 years and in those presenting with prohibitive co-morbidities such as stroke, circulatory collapse, full oral anticoagulation with the last generation drugs. We report on 5 high-risk and/or patients over 80 years who received external aortic wrapping with or without cardiopulmonary bypass during the last 18 months. All survived the procedure and could be extubated early postoperatively. No patient remained on the intensive care longer than 2 days and all were discharged without additional complications. Postoperative radiological control was acceptable and no patient had any new aortic event up to 18 months postoperatively.

The diagnostic and prognostic value of D-dimer in different types of aortic dissection

Objective

To evaluate the serum D-dimer level and its diagnostic and prognostic predictive value in patients with different types of aortic dissection.

Methods

Eighty-four aortic dissection patients who were diagnosed clinically in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2021 were selected for the study. All patients were divided into Stanford type A (39 cases) and Stanford type B (45 cases) groups. The serum D-dimer level was detected at 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 72 h after admission to the hospital, and its expression level with different types of aortic dissection was analyzed. The relationship between D-dimer and the prognosis of patients was also analyzed.

Results

The serum D-dimer levels of patients in group A were significantly higher than those in group B at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 72 h after admission, and the differences were statistically significant. In group A, 16 patients died, and 23 patients survived, while in group B, 18 patients died, and 27 patients survived. The serum D-dimer level of the dead and surviving patients in group A was significantly higher than that of group B, and the serum D-dimer level of dead patients in groups A and B was significantly higher than that of surviving patients. For diagnostic value, the AUC was 0.89, sensitivity was 76.92%, specificity was 90.00% in group A, and the AUC was 0.82, sensitivity was 71.11%, and specificity was 85.00% in group B. For the prognostic predicted value, the AUC was 0.74 in group A, while the AUC was 0.69 in group B.

Conclusions

D-dimer has different serum levels in different types of aortic dissection patients, with higher levels in Stanford A. Serum D-dimer levels may be used as a better biomarker to diagnose the two types of aortic dissection and play an important role in patient prognostic prediction, especially Stanford type A.

Pneumonia After Cardiovascular Surgery: Incidence, Risk Factors and Interventions

Postoperative pneumonia (POP) is prevalent in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery, associated with poor clinical outcomes, prolonged hospital stay and increased medical costs. This article aims to clarify the incidence, risk factors, and interventions for POP after cardiovascular surgery. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify previous reports involving POP after cardiovascular surgery. Current situation, predictors and preventive measures on the development of POP were collected and summarized. Many studies showed that POP was prevalent in various cardiovascular surgical types, and predictors varied in different studies, including advanced age, smoking, chronic lung disease, chronic kidney disease, cardiac surgery history, cardiac function, anemia, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, surgical types, cardiopulmonary bypass time, blood transfusion, duration of mechanical ventilation, repeated endotracheal intubation, and some other risk factors. At the same time, several targeted interventions have been widely reported to be effective to reduce the risk of POP and improve prognosis, including preoperative respiratory physiotherapy, oral care and subglottic secretion drainage. Through the review of the current status, risk factors and intervention measures, this article may play an important role in clinical prevention and treatment of POP after cardiovascular surgery.

Preoperative Nomogram and Risk Calculator for Postoperative Hypoxemia and Related Clinical Outcomes Following Stanford Type A Acute Aortic Dissection Surgery

Background

Hypoxemia is a common complication after Stanford type A acute aortic dissection surgery (AADS), however, few studies about hypoxemia after AADS exist. The aims of this study were to identify independent risk factors for hypoxemia after AADS and to clarify its association with clinical outcomes.

Methods

Patients undergoing AADS from 2016 to 2019 in our hospital were identified and used as a training set. Preoperative variables were first screened by univariate analysis and then entered into a multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors. A nomogram and an online risk calculator were constructed based on the logistic model to facilitate clinical practice and was externally validated in an independent dataset.

Results

Severe hypoxemia developed in 119 of the 492 included patients (24.2%) and poorer clinical outcomes were observed in these patients. Five independent risk factors for severe hypoxemia after AADS were identified by multivariate analysis, including older age, smoking history, renal insufficiency, higher body mass index, and white blood cell count. The model showed good calibration, discrimination, and clinical utility in the training set, and was well validated in the validation set. Risk stratification was performed and three risk groups were defined as low, medium, and high risk groups. Hypertension was identified as an independent risk factor for moderate hypoxemia besides the five predictors mentioned above, and renal insufficiency was not significant for mild hypoxemia by multivariate analysis. In addition, although frozen elephant trunk was associated with increased risk of postoperative hypoxemia in the univariate analysis, frozen elephant trunk was also not identified as an independent risk factor for postoperative hypoxemia in the multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Hypoxemia was frequent following AADS, related to poorer clinical outcomes. Predictors were identified and a nomogram as well as an online risk calculator predicting severe hypoxemia after AADS was developed and validated, which may be helpful for risk estimation and perioperative management.

"Time is aorta?": Timeliness of surgical repair in type A aortic dissection

Acute type A aortic dissection is a life‐threatening event that requires prompt management, a complex interaction among the timing of aortic surgical repair, presence or absence of organ malperfusion, and surgical outcomes exists. Whether resection of intimal entry tear should be deferred after reversal of malperfusion and end‐organ ischemia is a matter of controversy. In fact, the timing of aortic repair should be considered within the clinical presentation and baseline characteristics of each patient. Moreover, every effort should be made to minimize times between symptom onset, diagnosis, and surgery.

Incidence, Risk Factors and Outcomes of Postoperative Headache After Stanford Type a Acute Aortic Dissection Surgery

Background: Postoperative headache (POH) is common in clinical practice, however, no studies about POH after Stanford type A acute aortic dissection surgery (AADS) exist. This study aims to describe the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of POH after AADS, and to construct two prediction models.

Methods: Adults who underwent AADS from 2016 to 2020 in four tertiary hospitals were enrolled. Training and validation sets were randomly assigned according to a 7:3 ratio. Risk factors were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Nomograms were constructed and validated on the basis of independent predictors.

Results: POH developed in 380 of the 1,476 included patients (25.7%). Poorer outcomes were observed in patients with POH. Eight independent predictors for POH after AADS were identified when both preoperative and intraoperative variables were analyzed, including younger age, female sex, smoking history, chronic headache history, cerebrovascular disease, use of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, more blood transfusion, and longer cardiopulmonary bypass time. White blood cell and platelet count were also identified as significant predictors when intraoperative variables were excluded from the multivariate analysis. A full nomogram and a preoperative nomogram were constructed based on these independent predictors, both demonstrating good discrimination, calibration, clinical usefulness, and were well validated. Risk stratification was performed and three risk intervals were defined based on the full nomogram and clinical practice.

Conclusions: POH was common after AADS, portending poorer outcomes. Two nomograms predicting POH were developed and validated, which may have clinical utility in risk evaluation, early prevention, and doctor-patient communication.