Endovascular stent-graft placement in aortic dissection: a meta-analysis

Trends in the incidence, surgical management and outcomes of type B aortic dissections in Australia over the last decade

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate the incidence and in-hospital outcomes of surgical repair for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) in Australia.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the Australasian Vascular Audit (AVA) and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). The former is a total practice audit mandated for all members of the Australian and New Zealand Society for Vascular Surgery (ANZSVS) while the latter is an independent government agency which records all healthcare data in Australia. All cases of TBAD which underwent surgical intervention (endovascular or open repair) between 2010 and 2019 were identified using prospectively recorded data from the AVA (New Zealand data was excluded). The primary outcomes were temporal trends in procedures and hospital mortality; secondary outcomes were complications and risk factors for mortality. All admissions and procedures for, and hospital deaths from, TBAD in Australia were identified in AIHW datasets using the relevant diagnosis and procedure codes, with age-standardized rates calculated for the period 2000-01 to 2018-19.

RESULTS

A total of 567 cases of TBAD underwent vascular surgical intervention (AVA data, Australia). Of these, 96.3% were treated by endovascular repair. There was an increase in the annual procedure number from 45 in 2010 to 88 in 2019. In-hospital mortality was 4.8% for endovascular repair and 19% for open repair (p = 0.021). From 2000-01 to 2018-19, the age-standardized procedure rates for TBAD (Australia) doubled, the proportion of admitted patients undergoing a procedure rose from 28% to 43%, and in-hospital deaths fell by 25%.

CONCLUSION

There has been an increasing incidence of vascular surgical intervention for TBAD in Australia. The majority of patients received endovascular therapy while the mortality from surgically managed TBAD appears to be falling.

Preemptive treatment in the acute and early subacute phase of uncomplicated type B aortic dissections with poor prognosis factors

Objective

Due to its favorable outcome regarding late morbidity and mortality, thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) is becoming more popular for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD). This study aimed to compare preemptive endovascular treatment and optimal medical treatment (OMT) and OMT alone in patients presenting uncomplicated TBAD with predictors of aortic progression.

Design

Retrospective multicenter study.

Methods

We analyzed patients with uncomplicated TBAD and risk factors of progression in two French academic centers. Aortic events [defined as aortic-related (re)intervention or aortic-related death after initial hospitalization], postoperative complications, non-aortic events, and radiologic aortic progression and remodeling were recorded and analyzed. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

Results

Between 2011 and 2021, preemptive endovascular procedures at the acute and early subacute phase (<30 days) were performed on 24 patients (group 1) and OMT alone on 26 patients (group 2). With a mean follow-up of 38.08 ± 24.53 months, aortic events occurred in 20.83% of patients from group 1 and 61.54% of patients from group 2 (p < .001). No patient presented aortic-related death during follow-up. There were no differences in postoperative events (p = 1.00) and non-aortic events (p = 1.00). OMT patients had significantly more aneurysmal progression of the thoracic aorta (p < .001) and maximal aortic diameter (p < .001). Aortic remodeling was found in 91.67% of patients in group 1 and 42.31% of patients in group 2 (p < .001). A subgroup analysis of patients in group 1 showed that patients treated with preemptive TEVAR and STABILISE had reduced maximum aortic diameters at the 1-year (p = .010) and last follow-up (p = .030) compared to those in patients treated with preemptive TEVAR alone.

Conclusion

Preemptive treatment of uncomplicated TBAD with risk factors of progression reduces the risk of long-term aortic events. Over 60% of medically treated patients will require intervention during follow-up, with no benefit in terms of postoperative events. Even after surgical treatment, patients in the OMT group had significantly more aneurysmal progression, along with poorer aortic remodeling.

Optimal Timing of Pre-emptive Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

This network meta-analysis compares outcomes of optimal medical therapy (OMT) and pre-emptive thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection at different phases of chronicity.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through November 2023. Pooled short-term outcomes (short-term mortality, perioperative complications) and long-term outcomes (all-cause mortality, aortic-related mortality, aortic re-intervention rates) were calculated.

RESULTS

Systematic review identified 17 studies (2 randomized controlled trials, 3 propensity score matching, and 2 inverse probability weighting). Subacute-phase intervention had lower short-term mortality than the acute-phase (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval [CI]]=0.60 [0.38-0.94], p=0.027). No significant differences were observed in aortic rupture and paraplegia. Acute-phase TEVAR had a higher stroke incidence than subacute-phase intervention (HR [95% CI]=2.63 [1.36-5.09], p=0.042), chronic (HR [95% CI]=2.5 [1.03-6.2], p=0.043), and OMT (HR [95% CI]=1.57 [1.12-2.18], p=0.008). Acute-phase TEVAR had higher long-term all-cause mortality than subacute-phase intervention (HR [95% CI]=1.34 [1.03-1.74], p=0.03). Optimal medical therapy had elevated long-term all-cause mortality compared with subacute-phase TEVAR (HR [95% CI]=1.67 [1.25-2.33], p<0.001) and increased long-term aortic-related mortality vs acute-phase (HR [95% CI]=2.08 [1.31-3.31], p=0.002) and subacute-phase (HR [95% CI]=2.6 [1.62-4.18], p<0.01) interventions. No significant differences were observed in aortic re-intervention rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-emptive TEVAR may offer lower all-cause mortality and aortic-related mortality than OMT. Considering lower short-term mortality, perioperative stroke rate, and long-term mortality, our findings support pre-emptive TEVAR during the subacute phase.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The optimal timing of pre-emptive thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection remains uncertain. This network meta-analysis suggests that the subacute phase (14-90 days from symptom onset) emerges as the optimal timing for pre-emptive TEVAR. This window is associated with lower rates of short-term complications and higher long-term survival rates compared with alternative strategies.

Transcatheter electrosurgical septotomy technique for chronic postdissection aortic aneurysms

Aortic dissection often results in chronic aneurysmal degeneration due to progressive false lumen expansion. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair and other techniques of vessel incorporation such as fenestrated-branched or parallel grafts have been increasingly used to treat chronic postdissection aneurysms. True lumen compression or a vessel origin from the false lumen can present considerable technical challenges. In these cases, the limited true lumen space can result in inadequate stent graft expansion or restrict the ability to reposition the device or manipulate catheters. Reentrance techniques can be used selectively to assist with target vessel catheterization. Transcatheter electrosurgical septotomy is a novel technique that has evolved from the cardiology experience with transseptal or transcatheter aortic valve procedures. This technique has been applied in select patients with chronic dissection to create a proximal or distal landing zone, disrupt the septum in patients with an excessively compressed true lumen, or connect the true and false lumen in patients with vessels that have separate origins. In the present report, we summarize the indications and technical pitfalls of transcatheter electrosurgical septotomy in patients treated by endovascular repair for chronic postdissection aortic aneurysms.

Aortic Remodeling After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Nonacute Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Entry closure with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) results in aortic remodeling recently. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between aortic diameter or timing of surgical intervention from onset and remodeling after TEVAR for uncomplicated nonacute TBAD.

METHODS

Between April 2014 and December 2021, 83 consecutive patients underwent TEVAR for TBAD at our center. Forty patients with subacute and chronic uncomplicated TBADs with a patent false lumen, who could be followed up for at least 6 months, were included in this study. Indications for TEVAR included aortic diameter enlargement and preemptive treatment to prevent future aneurysmal changes in patients at risk of aortic diameter enlargement. Aortic remodeling was accessed, and data between the remodeling and nonremodeling groups were compared.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 97.5%, with a type Ia endoleak remaining in 1 patient. No operative or in-hospital mortality occurred. Paraparesis occurred in only 1 patient (2.5%). Follow-up was completed at a median of 53.5 months. Late death occurred in 3 cases, but there were no aortic-related deaths. Late aortic remodeling was achieved in 22 patients (55%). The preoperative maximum aortic diameter (PMAD) in the thoracic aortic region was 51.5 mm in the nonremodeling group, significantly larger than 42.5 mm in the remodeling group (P < 0.0001). The cutoff value of the PMAD for predicting aortic remodeling was 45 mm (area under the curve, 0.917; P = 0.028). The remodeling group had an earlier time from onset to intervention than the nonremodeling group, with a cutoff value of 6.3 months (area under the curve, 0.743; P = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR for nonacute uncomplicated TBAD resulted in a late aortic remodeling rate of 55%. This study suggested that a PMAD of >45 mm or a period >6.3 months between dissection onset and surgery hinders aortic remodeling after TEVAR.

Neurological event rates and associated risk factors in acute type B aortic dissections treated by thoracic aortic endovascular repair

OBJECTIVES

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair is the method of choice in patients with complicated type B acute aortic dissection. However, thoracic endovascular aortic repair carries a risk of periprocedural neurological events including stroke and spinal cord ischemia. We aimed to look at procedure-related neurological complications within a large cohort of patients with type B acute aortic dissection treated by thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

METHODS

Between 1996 and 2021, the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection collected data on 3783 patients with type B acute aortic dissection. For this analysis, 648 patients with type B acute aortic dissection treated by thoracic endovascular aortic repair were included (69.4% male, mean age 62.7 ± 13.4 years). Patients were excluded who presented with a preexisting neurologic deficit or received adjunctive procedures. Demographics, clinical symptoms, and outcomes were analyzed. The primary end point was the periprocedural incidence of neurological events (defined as stroke, spinal cord ischemia, transient neurological deficit, or coma). Predictors for perioperative neurological events and follow-up outcomes were considered as secondary end points.

RESULTS

Periprocedure neurological events were noted in 72 patients (11.1%) and included strokes (n = 29, 4.6%), spinal cord ischemias (n = 21, 3.3%), transient neurological deficits (n = 16, 2.6%), or coma (n = 6, 1.0%). The group with neurological events had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality (20.8% vs 4.3%, P < .001). Patients with neurological events were more likely to be female (40.3% vs 29.3%, P = .077), and aortic rupture was more often cited as an indication for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (38.8% vs 16.5%, P < .001). In patients with neurological events, more stent grafts were used (2 vs 1 stent graft, P = .002). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that aortic rupture (odds ratio, 3.12, 95% confidence interval, 1.44-6.78, P = .004) and female sex (odds ratio, 1.984, 95% confidence interval, 1.031-3.817, P = .040) were significantly associated with perioperative neurological events.

CONCLUSIONS

In this highly selected group from dedicated aortic centers, more than 1 in 10 patients with type B acute aortic dissection treated by thoracic endovascular aortic repair had neurological events, in particular women. Further research is needed to identify the causes and presentation of these events after thoracic endovascular aortic repair, especially among women.

Mid-term outcomes of left subclavian artery revascularization with Castor stent graft in treatment of type B aortic dissection in left subclavian artery

Background

Here we analyzed mid-term data of thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) surgery with Castor single-branched stent graft placement for the management of Stanford type B aortic dissection (STBAD) involving the left subclavian artery (LSA).

Methods

Between April 2014 and February 2019, 32 patients with STBAD involving a Castor single-branched stent graft were included. We analyzed their outcomes, including technical success rate (TSR), surgical duration (SD), presence of ischemia, perioperative complications, LSA patency, and survival rate (SR), using computed tomography angiography and clinical evaluation during mid-term follow-up.

Results

The mean patient age was 54.63 ​± ​12.37 years (range, 36-83 years). The TSR was 96.88% (n ​= ​31/32). The mean SD was 87.44 ​± ​10.89 with a mean contrast volume of 125.31 ​± ​19.30 ​mL. No neurological complications or deaths occurred during the study period. The patients had a mean hospital stay of 7.84 ​± ​3.20 days. At a mean follow-up of 68.78 ​± ​11.26 months, four non-aortic deaths (12.5%) were observed. The LSA patency rate was 100% (n ​= ​28/28). There was only one case of type I endoleak immediately after surgery (3.12%) (type I from LSA). However, none of the patients experienced type II endoleaks, and there were no cases of retrograde type A aortic dissection or stent graft-driven new distal entry. Finally, all patients exhibited good LSA patency.

Conclusion

TEVAR using a Castor single-branched stent graft may be a highly feasible and efficient procedure for the management of STBAD involving the LSA.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of retrograde type A aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with type B aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

Retrograde type A dissection (RTAD) is a devastating complication of thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) with low incidence but high mortality. The objective of this study is to report the incidence, mortality, potential risk factors, clinical manifestation and diagnostic modalities, and medical and surgical treatments.

METHODS

A systematic review and single-arm and two-arm meta-analyses evaluated all published reports of RTAD post-TEVAR through January 2021. All study types were included, except study protocols and animal studies, without time restrictions. Outcomes of interest were procedural data (implanted stent-grafts type, and proximal stent-graft oversizing), the incidence of RTAD, associated mortality rate, clinical manifestations, diagnostic workouts and therapeutic management.

RESULTS

RTAD occurred in 285 out of 10,600 patients: an estimated RTAD incidence of 2.3% (95% CI: 1.9-2.8); incidence of early RTAD was approximately 1.8 times higher than late. Wilcoxon signed-rank testing showed that the proportion of RTAD patients with acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) was significantly higher than those with chronic TBAD (P = .008). Pooled meta-analysis showed that the incidence of RTAD with proximal bare stent TEVAR was 2.1-fold higher than with non-bare stents: risk ratio was 1.55 (95% CI: 0.87-2.75; P = .13). Single arm meta-analysis estimated a mortality rate of 42.2% (95% CI: 32.5-51.8), with an I2 heterogeneity of 70.11% (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

RTAD is rare after TEVAR but with high mortality, especially in the first month post-TEVAR with acute TBAD patients at greater risk as well as those treated with proximal bare stent endografts.

Aortoesophageal fistulae following TEVAR: Case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Aortoesophageal fistulae are an uncommon pathology, primarily due to the aortic pathology in more than 50 % of the cases, followed by foreign body ingestion, and advanced malignancies. Recently it is recognized after surgical management of thoracic aortic pathologies either open or endovascular, with increased rates of morbidity and mortality.

PRESENTATION OF THE CASE

We present a 62-year-old male patient with a previous history of thoracic endovascular aortic repair, who enters the emergency room with gastrointestinal bleeding and clinical signs of infection. Positive blood cultures, and tomographic signs include prosthetic gas, with endoscopic findings of aortoesophageal fistulae. Aggressive surgical management was performed including esophageal resection and gastrointestinal exclusion. Bleeding control was reached in the early postoperative period, nevertheless despite multidisciplinary management, the patient died 8 days after surgery.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Aortoesophageal fistulae, remains to be an uncommon complication either of thoracic aortic aneurysm or after endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysm; with high rates of morbidity and mortality, should be suspected in every case with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the context of a patient with aortic disease. Non-surgical management should be avoided due to the high risk of complications and mortality, aggressive management needs to be considered in each case according to clinical condition of the patient.

CONCLUSION

Aortoesophageal fistulae remain an uncommon complication after TEVAR, with increased mortality and morbidity rates after complete treatment. Conservative management should be avoided to achieve bleeding control and prevent the extension of the infection.

Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors of Noninfectious Fever after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair of Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is gradually becoming a first-line treatment of complicated acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD). Interestingly, according to years of experience in the treatment of ATBAD, we found that patients with ATBAD often had unexplained noninfectious fever after TEVAR. This study aims to explore its clinical characteristics and independent risk factors.

METHODS

From January 2016 to September 2021, 211 consecutive patients treated electively by TEVAR for ATBAD were included. The entry tears in all patients originated in the distal to the left subclavian artery (LSA). All patients were diagnosed with ATBAD for the first time. The definition of fever in this study was that the body temperature of patients after TEVAR exceeds 38°C.

RESULTS

A total of 211 patients (53.62 ± 11.34 years, 81% men) were included in the analysis. To compare patients who did and did not have post-TEVAR fever, they were respectively classified as the fever group and the nonfever group. Fever was diagnosed in 115 (55%) patients. Preoperatively, statistical differences were recorded in age (P = 0.023) and red blood cell (P = 0.037). Age <60 years [odds ratio (OR) 2.194, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.147-4.196, P = 0.018] and duration of the operation >3 hr (OR 3.586, 95% CI 1.133-11.350, P = 0.03) were positively associated with fever. In the comparison of preoperative and postoperative experimental data, the changes in white blood cell (P = 0.046) and platelet (P = 0.007) of the 2 groups were significantly different. Hospital stay (P = 0.009) and postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001) in the fever group were significantly prolonged. There was no difference in survival in the mid- and long-term follow-up between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Noninfectious fever occurs in more than half of the patients after TEVAR (115/211, 54.5%). Patients in the fever group are younger. Age <60 years and duration of the operation >3 hr are independent risk factors for noninfectious fever in patients with ATBAD after TEVAR fever. Noninfectious fever after TEVAR may lead to prolonged hospital stay. However, it did not affect mid- and long-term prognosis.

Endovascular treatment of complicated versus uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to analyze the outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair performed for complicated and uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissections.

METHODS

Patients from WL Gore's Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute type B aortic dissections were included, and data were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 5014 patients enrolled in the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment, 172 underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute type B aortic dissections. Of these repairs, 102 were for complicated acute type B aortic dissections and 70 were for uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissections. There were 46 (45.1%) procedures related to aortic branch vessels versus 15 (21.4%) in complicated type B aortic dissections and uncomplicated type B aortic dissections (P = .002). The mean length of stay was 14.3 ± 10.6 days (median, 11; range, 2-75) versus 9.8 ± 7.9 days (median, 8; range, 0-42) in those with complicated type B aortic dissections versus those with uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissections (P < .001). Thirty-day mortality was not different between groups (complicated type B aortic dissections 2.9% vs uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissections 1.4%, P = .647), as well as aortic complications (8.8% vs 5.7%, P = .449). Aortic event-free survival was 62.9% ± 37.1% versus 70.6% ± 29.3% at 3 years (P = .696).

CONCLUSIONS

In the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment, thoracic endovascular aortic repair results for complicated type B aortic dissections versus uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissections showed that 30-day mortality and perioperative complications were equally low for both. The midterm outcome was positive. These data confirm that thoracic endovascular aortic repair as the first-line strategy for treating complicated type B dissections is associated with a low risk of complications. Further studies with longer follow-up are necessary to define the role of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in uncomplicated acute type B dissections compared with medical therapy. However, in the absence of level A evidence from randomized trials, results of the uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection patient cohort treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair from registries are important to understand the related risk and benefit.

Surgical and endovascular repair for type B aortic dissections with mesenteric malperfusion syndrome: A systematic review of in-hospital mortality

OBJECTIVES

Mesenteric malperfusion is a feared complication of aortic dissection, with high mortality. The purpose of this study was to systematically review in-hospital mortality (IHM) of endovascular and surgical management of acute and chronic Stanford type B aortic dissections (TBAD) complicated by mesenteric malperfusion (MesMP).

METHODS

A systematic search of English language articles was conducted in relevant databases. Data on patient demographics, procedure details, and survival outcomes were collected. Reports were classified by type of intervention performed. Studies that failed to report patient-level outcomes based on specific intervention performed or IHM were excluded. Retrospective chart review of previously published data from a single institution was also performed to further identify cases of TBAD that were managed endovascularly. The Fisher exact test was performed to determine statistical significance.

RESULTS

In total, 37 articles were suitable for inclusion in this systematic review, which yielded 149 patients with a median age 55.0 years (interquartile range, 46.5-65 years) and 79% being male. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 12.8% (19/149) and was similar between endovascular and open surgical interventions (13% vs 11%, P = .99). Among endovascular strategies, IHM was greater, although not statistically significant in the thoracic endovascular aortic repair group compared with the fenestration/stenting without thoracic endovascular aortic repair group (24% vs 11%, P = .15).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple strategies exist for the management of TBAD with MesMP; however, a majority of cases were managed endovascularly. Despite advances in therapies, mortality remains high at 13%.

A retrospective study of thoracic endovascular aortic repair timing in patients with uncomplicated type B dissection who have a smoking history

Objective

To determine the optimal timing of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for patients with uncomplicated type B dissections who have a smoking history.

Methods

Data from 308 consecutive patients with uncomplicated type B dissections, who have a smoking history and onset-to-TEVAR time within 90 days, were analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups: Acute and subacute phases. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed. Smooth curve fitting and threshold analysis were performed to characterize the relationship between the onset-to-TEVAR time and follow-up deaths.

Results

There were no significant differences between the two groups. Smooth curve fitting and threshold effect analysis showed that if early TEVAR was performed within 9.4 days from onset, there was better long-term survival and there was no significant difference after 9.4 days.

Conclusion

By studying the relationship between onset-to-TEVAR time and all-cause mortality, we found that early TEVAR may have a lower all-cause mortality rate during follow-up in uncomplicated type B dissection patients who have a smoking history and within 90 days from onset.

Timing of Intervention for Aortic Intramural Hematoma

Intramural hematoma (IMH) is one of the acute aortic syndromes along with acute aortic dissection and penetrating aortic ulcer. The three conditions can occur alone or in combination with overlapping presentation. Medical, open surgical, and endovascular treatment is tailored depending on clinical presentation, timing, and location within the aorta. Among patients who present with acute IMH affecting the ascending aorta (Type A), urgent open surgical repair is considered the primary line of treatment in patients who are suitable candidates and unstable. The management of IMH in the descending aorta and aortic arch (Type B) is similar to that applied to treat acute dissections in the same segment. Medical treatment with sequential imaging is recommended in patients with uncomplicated course, and endovascular repair is indicated in patients with rupture, persistent pain, end-organ ischemia, or rapid aortic enlargement. This review discusses the ideal timing for treatment of IMH.

Chronic Thoracic Aortic Dissection: How to Treat, When to Intervene

Thoracic aortic dissection (AD) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Acute aortic syndrome is the first presentation of the disease in most cases. While acute AD management follows concrete guidelines because of its urgent and life-threatening nature, chronic AD is usually overlooked, although it concerns a wide spectrum of patients surviving an acute event. Acute AD survivors ultimately enter a chronic aortic disease course. Patients with chronic thoracic AD (CTAD) require lifelong surveillance and a proportion of them may present with symptoms and late complications demanding further surgical or endovascular treatment. However, the available data concerning the management of CTAD is sparse in the literature. The management of patients with CTAD is challenging as far as determining the best medical therapy and deciding on intervention are concerned. Until recently, there were no guidelines or recommendations for imaging surveillance in patients with chronic AD. The diagnostic methods for imaging aortic diseases have been improved, while the data on new endovascular and surgical approaches has increased significantly. In this review, we summarize the current evidence in the diagnosis and management of CTAD and the latest recommendations for the surgical/endovascular aortic repair of CTAD.

Beta-blocker Use After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Patients with Type B Aortic Dissection Is Associated with Improved Early Aortic Remodeling

OBJECTIVE

Beta-blockers are first-line anti-impulse therapy in patients presenting with acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD). However, little is understood about their impact after aortic repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of postoperative beta-blocker use on outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in TBAD.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative database was queried for all patients undergoing TEVAR for TBAD from 2012 to 2020. Aortic-related reintervention, all-cause mortality and effect of TEVAR on false lumen thrombosis of the treated aortic segment were assessed and compared between patients treated with and without beta-blocker postoperatively. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effect of beta-blocker therapies on outcomes.

RESULTS

1,114 patients undergoing TEVAR for TBAD were identified with a mean follow-up of 18±12 months. The mean age was 61.1±11.9 years, and 791 (71%) were male. 935 (84%) patients were maintained on beta-blocker at discharge and follow-up. Patients on beta-blocker were more likely to have an entry tear originating in zones 1-2 (22% vs 13%; P=.022). The prevalence of acute, elective and symptomatic AD, concurrent aneurysm, number of endografts used, distribution of the proximal and distal zones of dissection and operative time were comparable between the two cohorts. At 18-months, significantly more complete false lumen thrombosis (58 vs 47%; log-rank P=.018) was observed in patients on beta-blocker while the rates of aortic-related reinterventions (13% vs 9%; log-rank P=.396) and mortality (0.2% vs 0.7%; log-rank P=.401) were similar in patients with and without beta-blocker, respectively. Even after adjusting for clinical and anatomic factors, postoperative beta-blocker use was associated with increased complete false lumen thrombosis (HR 1.56; 95% CI: 1.10-2.21; P=.012) but did not affect mortality or aortic-related reintervention. A secondary analysis of beta-blocker use in acute versus chronic TBAD showed a higher rate of complete false lumen thrombosis in patients on beta-blocker in chronic TBAD (59% vs 38%; log-rank P=.038). In contrast, there was no difference in the rate of complete false lumen thrombosis in acute TBAD between the two cohorts (58% vs 51%; log-rank P=.158). When analyzed separately, postoperative ACE inhibitor use did not affect the rates of complete false lumen thrombosis, mortality and aortic-related reintervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Beta-blocker use was associated with promotion of complete false lumen in patients undergoing TEVAR for TBAD. In addition to its role in acute setting, anti-impulse control with beta-blocker appears to confer favorable aortic remodeling and may improve outcomes after TEVAR, particularly for chronic TBAD.

Acute or Subacute, the Optimal Timing for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To evaluate the optimal timing (acute or subacute) of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for uncomplicated B aortic dissection (uTBAD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Method

A comprehensive literature search was undertaken across three major databases (EMBASE/Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane Library) and was assessed until November 2021 to identify studies reporting the outcomes of TEVAR utilized to treat patients with uTBAD. The continuous variables were compared between the two groups using t-test and the categorical variables were compared using the χ2-test. A meta-analysis was used to produce pooled odds ratios for early and follow-up outcomes. The random effects models were applied. A statistical analysis was performed using R software v.4.1.

Result

A comprehensive literature search found 490 citations published within the predetermined time span of the analysis. Three studies including 1,193 patients (acute group 718, subacute group 475) were finally included for downstream meta-analysis. An acute uTBAD group presented with higher rates both in 30-day complications (20.5 vs. 13.7%; p = 0.014) and mortality (4.6 vs. 1.3%; p = 0.004) than subacute group. The respiratory complications were significantly higher in the acute group than in the subacute group (10.8 vs. 5.0%; p = 0.015). The procedure success rate (90.8 vs. 93.6%; p = 0.329), the follow-up mortality (7.7 vs. 7.6%; p = 1) and dissection-related late mortality (3.9 vs. 5.3%; p = 0.603) showed no significant difference.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis suggested that despite significantly higher 30-day complications and 30-day mortality in the acute uTBAD group, there was no significant difference in the follow-up mortality between the two groups.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42021247609.

Endovascular repair of acute complicated type B aortic dissection-systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term survival and reintervention

Background

Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) is considered the first-line therapy in the repair of acute complicated type B aortic dissection (AC-BAD). Given the difficulty of designing randomized trials in this surgical cohort, long-term outcome data is limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis provide a complete aggregation of reported long-term survival and freedom from reintervention of AC-BAD patients based on the existing literature.

Methods

Three databases were searched from date of database inception to January 2021. The relevant references were identified and baseline cohort characteristics, survival and freedom from reintervention were extracted. The primary endpoints were survival and freedom from reintervention, whilst secondary endpoints were post-operative outcomes such as cord ischemia and endoleak. Kaplan-Meier curves were digitized and aggregated as per established procedure.

Results

A total of 2,812 references were identified in the literature search for review, with 46 selected for inclusion. A total of 2,565 patients were identified, of which 1,920 (75%) were male. The mean age of the cohort was 59.8±5.8. Actuarial survival at 2, 4, 6 and 10 years was 87.5%, 83.2%, 78.5% and 69.7%, respectively. Freedom from all secondary reintervention at 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 years was 74.7%, 69.1%, 65.7%, 63.9% and 60.9%, respectively. When accounting for study quality, actuarial survival at 2, 4, 6 and 8 years was 85.4%, 79.1%, 69.8% and 63.1%, respectively. Freedom from all secondary reintervention at 2, 4, 6 and 8 years was 73.2%, 67.6%, 63.7% (maintained), respectively.

Conclusions

TEVAR is associated with promising long-term survival extended to 10 years, though rates of freedom from reintervention remain an ongoing point for improvement. Randomized controlled trials comparing endovascular with open repair in the setting of acute, complicated type B aortic dissection are needed.

Endovascular versus open surgical repair for complicated chronic Type B aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

Type B aortic dissection can lead to serious and life-threatening complications such as aortic rupture, stroke, renal failure, and paraplegia, all of which require intervention. Traditionally, these complications have been treated with open surgery. Recently however, endovascular repair has been proposed as an alternative.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of thoracic aortic endovascular repair versus open surgical repair for treatment of complicated chronic Type B aortic dissection (CBAD).

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and AMED databases, as well as the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers, to 2 August 2021. We searched references of relevant articles retrieved through the electronic search for additional citations.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) assessing the effects of thoracic aortic endovascular repair (TEVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR) for treatment of complicated chronic Type B aortic dissection (CBAD). Outcomes of interest were mortality (all-cause, dissection-related), neurological sequelae (stroke, spinal cord ischaemia/paresis-paralysis, vertebral insufficiency), morphological outcomes (false lumen thrombosis, progression of dissection, aortic diameters), acute renal failure, ischaemic symptoms (visceral ischaemia, limb ischaemia), re-intervention, and health-related quality of life.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened all titles and abstracts identified by the searches to identify those that met the inclusion criteria. From title and abstract screening, we did not identify any trials (RCTs or CCTs) that required full-text assessment. We planned to undertake data collection and analysis in accordance with recommendations described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We planned to assess the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We did not identify any trials (RCTs or CCTs) that met the inclusion criteria for this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Due to lack of RCTs or CCTs investigating the effectiveness and safety of TEVAR compared to OSR for patients with complicated CBAD, we are unable to provide any evidence to inform decision-making on the optimal intervention for these patients. High-quality RCTs or CCTs addressing this objective are necessary. However, conducting such studies will be challenging for this life-threatening disease.

A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Endovascular Repair Versus Open Surgery for Ruptured Descending Thoracic Aorta

OBJECTIVE

The comparisons between thoracic endovascular aortic repair for ruptured thoracic aorta (TEVAR) and open surgery (OS) have not been well documented, although both procedures have been widely utilized. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness and safety between TEVAR and OS in the repair of ruptured descending thoracic aorta.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to find relevant studies to assess TEVAR and OS outcomes. The comparative parameters were perioperative mortality (30 day/in-hospital), 1 year mortality, paraplegia or paraparesis, renal insufficiency, stroke, pulmonary embolism, re-intervention rate, pulmonary complications, and cardiac complications. A fixed-effects model was applied to calculate the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) on pooled outcomes from different studies.

RESULTS

Eighteen observational trials involving 2088 patients were evaluated (TEVAR=560; OS=1528). Meta-analysis showed that TEVAR in repairing the ruptured descending thoracic aorta was associated with lower perioperative mortality (OR=0.47; 95% CI: 0.34-0.66; p<0.01), 1 year mortality (OR=0.46; 95% CI: 0.29-0.75; p<0.01), renal insufficiency incidence (OR=0.56; 95% CI: 0.33-0.93; p=0.03), and pulmonary complications (OR=0.69; 95% CI: 0.52-0.92; p=0.01) when compared with OS. There was no significant difference between TEVAR and OS in terms of paraplegia, stroke, pulmonary embolism, cardiac complications, and early re-intervention rates. However, the late re-intervention rate was higher in the TEVAR group than that in the OS group.

CONCLUSIONS

When repairing the ruptured descending thoracic aorta, TEVAR may be performed rapidly and safely. TEVAR is associated with lower rates of perioperative morbidity and early postoperative complications than OS.

Endovascular therapies for Type B Aortic Dissection

Aortic dissection is a life-threatening condition resulting from a tear in the intimal layer of the aorta, requiring emergent diagnosis and prompt multi-disciplinary management strategy for best patient outcomes. While type A dissection involving ascending aorta is best managed surgically due to high early mortality, type B aortic dissection (TBAD) involving descending aorta generally has better outcomes with conservative management and medical therapy as primary strategy is favored. However, there has been a recent paradigm shift in management of TBAD due to late aneurysmal degeneration of TBAD increasing morbidity and mortality at longer-term. Late surgical intervention can be prevented by early endovascular intervention when combined with optimal medical therapy. In this narrative review, we explore available literature on different endovascular therapies for TBAD in different populations of patients.

Extended Stent Coverage Decreases Distal Aortic Segmental Enlargement After the Endovascular Repair of Acute Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study of 814 Patients

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the effect of distal aortic segmental enlargement (DASE) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for complicated type B aortic dissection (cTBAD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From March 2003 to October 2018, 814 patients with acute cTBAD from 5 medical centers were retrospectively identified. DASE is indicated as the enlargement of distal aortic segmental volume ≥1.6 fold of the preoperative volume compared with the most recent postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan. Of these patients, 635 (78%) were identified as non-DASE, and 179 (22%) were identified as DASE. Competing risk analysis was performed to compare late death and distal aortic reintervention between the groups. The morphological variables and false lumen thrombosis at 7 aortic levels were measured based on the preoperative CTA and the most recent CTA. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess the independent predictors of DASE.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time of the entire cohort was 5.6 years (interquartile range: 2.4-8.3 years). There were total of 208 late deaths, including 94 (14.8%) deaths in non-DASE group versus 114 (63.7%) deaths in the DASE group. Distal aortic reintervention was observed in 89 patients, with 43(6.7%) in the non-DASE group versus 46 (25.7%) in the DASE group. The cumulative incidence of late death and distal aortic reintervention were significantly higher in the DASE than in the non-DASE group (p<0.001). In morphological analysis, significant incomplete false lumen thrombosis was observed in all distal aortic segments above the aortic level of celiac artery (p<0.01). According to multivariate analysis, the Marfan syndrome, stent coverage to the level of diaphragm and the level of celiac artery were independent predictors of the DASE (p<0.001). Patients with extended stent coverage to the level of celiac artery have shown a lower incidence of DASE (p<0.010).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the non-DASE group, patients with DASE demonstrated a higher rate of late death and distal aortic reintervention. For the cTBAD population, extended stent-graft coverage to the aortic section between diaphragm and celiac artery might serve as a "cost-efficient" cutoff point aiming to reduce the risk of DASE.

Computational Investigation and Histopathological Validation of Interaction Between Stent Graft and Aorta in Retrograde Type A Dissection After TEVAR in Canine Models

PURPOSE

Retrograde type A dissection (RTAD) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been a major drawback of endovascular treatment. To our knowledge, no studies have simulated and validated aortic injuries caused by stent grafts (SGs) in animal models. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate and quantify the SG-aorta interaction through computational simulations and to investigate the underlying mechanism through histopathological examinations.

METHODS

Two custom-made Fabulous^® (DiNovA Meditech, Hang Zhou, China) SGs were implanted in 2 canine aortas with a 5-mm difference in the distance in landing locations. The aortic geometries were extracted from RTAD and non-RTAD cases. A computational SG model was assembled based on the implanted SG using the software Pro-ENGINEER Wildfire 5.0 (PTC Corporation, Needham, Mass). TEVAR simulations were performed 7 times for each canine model using Abaqus software (Providence, RI, USA), and the maximum aortic stress (MAS) was calculated and compared among the groups. Three months after SG implantation, the canine aortas were harvested, and were examined using hematoxylin and eosin staining and Elastica Van Gieson (EVG) staining to evaluate histopathological changes.

RESULTS

In the computational models for both canines, MAS was observed at the proximal bare stent (PBS) at aortic greater curve. The PBS generated higher stress toward the aortic wall than other SG parts did. Moreover, the MAS was significantly higher in canine No.1 than in canine No.2 (0.415±0.210 versus 0.200±0.160 MPa) (p<0.01). Notably, in canine No.1, an RTAD developed at the MAS segment, and histopathological examinations of the segment showed an intimal flap, a false lumen, elastin changes, and medial necrosis. RTAD was not observed in canine No.2. In both SG-covered aortas, medial necrosis, elastic fiber stretching, and inflammatory infiltration were seen.

CONCLUSION

The characteristic MAS distribution remained at the location where the apex of the PBS interacted with the aortic wall at greater curve. RTAD histopathological examinations showed intimal damage and medial necrosis at the proximal landing zone, at the same MAS location in computational simulations. The in vivo results were consistent with the computational simulations, suggesting the MAS at greater curve may cause RTAD, and the potential application of computational simulation in the mechanism study of RTAD.

Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Medications Do Not Affect Aortic Remodeling after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection

OBJECTIVE

There is a lack of evidence regarding the effect of anticoagulation and antiplatelet medications on aortic remodeling for aortic dissection after endovascular repair. We investigated whether anticoagulation and antiplatelet medications affect aortic remodeling after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Type B aortic dissection (TBAD).

METHODS

Records of the Vascular Quality Initiative TEVAR registry (2012-2020) were reviewed. Procedures performed for TBAD were included. Aortic reintervention, false lumen thrombosis of the treated aorta and all-cause mortality at follow-up were compared between patients treated with and without anticoagulation medications. A secondary analysis was performed to assess the effect of antiplatelet therapy in patients not on anticoagulation. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effect of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies on outcomes.

RESULTS

1,210 patients (mean age, 60.7±12.2 years; 825 (68%) males) were identified with a mean follow-up of 21.2±15.7 months (range 1-94 months). 166 (14%) patients were on anticoagulation medications at discharge and at follow-up. Patients on anticoagulation were more likely to be older (mean age, 65.5 vs 60 years; P<.001) and Caucasian (69% vs 55%; P=.003), with higher proportions of coronary artery disease (10% vs 3%; P<.001), congestive heart failure (10% vs 2%; P<.001) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (15% vs 9%; P=.017). There were no differences in the mean preoperative thoracic aortic diameter or the number of endografts used. At 18-month, the rates of aortic reinterventions (8% vs 9% log-rank P=.873), complete false lumen thrombosis (52% vs 45%; P=.175) and mortality (2.5% vs 2.7%; P=.209) were similar in patients with and without anticoagulation, respectively. Controlling for covariates with the Cox regression method, anticoagulation use was not independently associated with a decreased rates of complete false lumen thrombosis (hazard ratio (HR) 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.5-1.1; P=.132), increased need for aortic reinterventions (HR 1.02; 95% CI, 0.62-1.68; P=.934), and mortality (HR 1.25; 95% CI, 0.64-2.47; P=.514). On a secondary analysis, antiplatelet medications did not affect the rates of aortic reintervention, complete false lumen thrombosis and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulation and antiplatelet medications do not appear to negatively influence the midterm endpoints of aortic reintervention or death in patients undergoing TEVAR for TBAD. Moreover, it did not impair complete false lumen thrombosis. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet medications do not adversely affect aortic remodeling and survival in this population at midterm.

[Acute localized dissection of the descending thoracic aorta: A diagnostic trap]

Localized dissection of the descending thoracic aorta; class 3 of the classification proposed by the European Society of Cardiology; is a short and limited length dissection involving the descending thoracic aorta. It is a rare and unrecognized variant that poses a clinical and radiological diagnostic challenge. Indeed, it is manifested by an aspecific clinical profile represented by the acute aortic syndrome and characterized by a confused radiological aspect that entangled with the other differential diagnoses. We would like to emphasize the rarity of this uncommon pathology and the difficulty encountered in defining it based on a case treated in our department and a review of the literature.

A multicenter study of emergency endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta: Indications and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular techniques have become an essential tool for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic disease (thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair [TEVAR]). The aim is to analyze the indications and outcomes of emergency TEVAR at national level in relation to elective surgery.

STUDY DESIGN AND SCOPE

A retrospective multicenter registry of patients with descending thoracic aortic disease treated on an emergency basis using endovascular techniques between 2012-2016, in 11 clinical units.

PATIENTS, INCLUSION CRITERIA

1) Ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (RTAA); 2) Blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury (TAI); and 3) Complicated acute type B aortic dissections (TBADc).

PRIMARY VARIABLES

Patient mortality, survival and reoperation rate.

SECONDARY VARIABLES

Demographic data, cardiovascular risk factors, specific data by indication, technical resources and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 135 urgent TEVARs were included (111 men, mean age 60.4 ± 16.3 years): 43 ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysms (31.9%), 54 type B dissections (40%) and 32 traumatic aortic injuries (23.7%), and other etiologies 4.4%. The overall mortality rate at 30 days was 18.5%, and proved higher in the RTAA group (27.9%). The mean actuarial survival rate was 67 ± 6% at 5 years. The postoperative stroke rate was 5.2%, and the paraplegia rate was 5.9%. Aortic reoperations proved necessary in 12 patients (9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency descending thoracic aortic diseases can be treated by endovascular techniques with optimal results and low morbidity and mortality - though the figures are slightly higher than in elective cases. This registry provides, for the first time, real information on the daily clinical practice of emergency TEVAR in Spain.

RETRACTED: Anesthesic and surgical guideline for the treatment of the thoraco-abdominal aorta. Consensus Document of the Spanish Societies of Anesthesia and Cardiovascular Surgery

Este artículo ha sido retirado por indicación del Editor Jefe de la revista, después de constatar que parte de su contenido había sido plagiado, sin mencionar la fuente original: European Heart Journal (2014) 35, 2873 926.: https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/35/41/2873/407693#89325738 El autor de correspondencia ha sido informado de la decisión y está de acuerdo con la retirada del artículo. El Comité Editorial lamenta las molestias que esta decisión pueda ocasionar. Puede consultar la política de Elsevier sobre la retirada de artículos en https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal

Drag Forces after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair. General Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Despite the great evolution of endograft devices for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), threatening related complication such as graft migration and endoleaks still occur during follow up. The Drag Forces (DF), that is the displacement forces that play a role in graft migration and endoleaks caused by the blood flow against the thoracic graft, can be studied by means of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD).

METHOD

A general review of papers found in current literature was performed. CFD studies available on the topic of thoracic aortic diseases and DF were analyzed. All anatomic, hemodynamics or graft related factors which could have an impact on DF were reported.

RESULTS

Different factors deeply influence DF magnitude in the different site of the Ishimaru's zones classification: angulation, tortuosity and length of the landing zone, graft diameter, length and deployment position, blood pressure, pulse waveform, blood viscosity and patient heart rate have been related to the magnitude of DF. Moreover, also the three-dimensional orientation of DF is emerging as a fundamental issue from CFD studies. DF can be divided in sideways and upward components. The former, even of higher magnitude in zone 0, maintain always an orthogonal orientation and does not change in any type of aortic arch; the latter result strictly related to the anatomic complexity of the aortic arch with values up to four times higher in zone 3.

CONCLUSION

Different DF magnitude and orientation could explain how TEVAR have higher rate of migration and endoleaks when we face with more complex aortic anatomies. All these aspects should be foreseen during the planning of TEVAR procedure. In this field, collaboration between physicians and engineers is crucial, as both parts have a primary role in understanding and describing hidden aspects involved in TEVAR procedures.

Systematic review of endovascular stent grafting versus open surgical repair for the elective treatment of arch/descending thoracic aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

To review comparisons of the effectiveness of endovascular stent grafting (ESG) against open surgical repair (OSR) for treatment of chronic arch or descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, WHO International Clinical Trials Routine data collection, current controlled trials, clinical trials and the NIHR portfolio were searched from January 1994 to March 2020.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTIVE STUDIES

All identified studies that compared ESG and OSR, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-randomised and non-RCTs, comparative cohort studies and case-control studies matched on main outcomes were sought. Participants had to receive elective treatments for arch/descending (TAA). Studies were excluded where other thoracic aortic conditions (eg, rupture or dissection) were reported, unless results for patients receiving elective treatment for arch/descending TAA reported separately.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by another. Risk of Bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects. Where meta-analysis not appropriate, results were reported narratively.

RESULTS

Five comparative cohort studies met inclusion criteria, reporting 3955 ESG and 21 197 OSR patients. Meta-analysis of unadjusted short-term (30 day) all-cause mortality favoured ESG (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.03)). Heterogeneity identified between larger and smaller studies. Sensitivity analysis of four studies including only descending TAA showed no statistical significance (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.18)), moderate heterogeneity. Meta-analysis of adjusted short-term all-cause mortality favoured ESG (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.98)), no heterogeneity. Longer-term (beyond 30 days) survival from all-cause mortality favoured OSR in larger studies and ESG in smaller studies. Freedom from reintervention in the longer-term favoured OSR. Studies reporting short-term non-fatal complications suggest fewer events following ESG.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited and increasingly dated evidence on the comparison of ESG and OSR for treatment of arch/descending TAA.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42017054565.

Epidemiology of aortic dissection

Aortic dissection remains a highly morbid diagnosis. The treatment of aortic dissection has undergone several paradigm shifts since it was first understood. However, despite the robust research in treatment, the epidemiology of aortic dissection is limited. In this review, we discuss the historical perspectives of aortic dissection with a review of risk factors and presentation. We review the trends in incidence during the past 40 years, with consideration for sex, race, and ethnicity in admission. We further focus our discussion of the classically described Type B aortic dissection treatment. Lastly, we review the impact of long-term events, readmissions, cost assessments, and quality of life studies of patients with aortic dissection. Care for those with aortic dissection remains a long-term challenge for providers and a multispecialty approach is needed for complete patient management.

Technique-Based Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes and Aortic Remodelling Following TEVAR in Acute and Subacute Type B Aortic Dissection

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the clinical outcomes and aortic remodelling rates following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for acute or subacute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) based on technique.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All TEVARs for acute/subacute TBAD between 01/01/2008 and 01/06/2020 were included. TEVARS were grouped by technique (TEVAR only, PETTICOAT and STABILISE). Aortic remodelling was assessed at three aortic levels on follow-up CT. Thirty-day technical/clinical success rates, re-intervention rates and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients were included. The median age was 55 years (31-82). The median duration from initial presentation to TEVAR was 7 days (0-84). Intra-procedural complications included one aortic rupture from balloon moulding in a STABILISE case. Thirty-day mortality, stroke, spinal cord ischaemia and visceral ischaemia were 3% (n = 1), 3% (n = 1), 3% (n = 1) and 3% (n = 1), respectively. (All occurred in acute TBAD.) Overall survival was 50.5 months (18-115). Median follow-up was 31 months (1-115). Six patients (21%) required re-intervention, with a median time of 5 months (5-46) from first TEVAR. Overall complete aortic remodelling rates were: 89% at the proximal descending thoracic aorta, 78% at the distal thoracic aorta and 50% at the infra-renal abdominal aorta. At the infra-renal aorta, the STABILISE group (n = 11) had a higher complete aortic remodelling rate (82%) compared to TEVAR alone (n = 12) (20%).

CONCLUSION

Endovascular intervention for acute and subacute TBAD is safe with a high rate of technical success. STABILISE results in higher aortic remodelling at the infra-renal aorta (82%) compared to TEVAR alone (20%) but risks aortic rupture from balloon moulding.

Case report: Keeping a cool head - A delayed open repair of a ruptured TAAA

INTRODUCTION

The limited resources available for complex surgical procedures during the nightshift can influence the postoperative outcome and are associated with increased complication rates and 30-day mortality. On the other hand, cases of the nightshift are often urgent and demand prompt reaction.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

Hereby we report a patient with a ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, who was admitted during nightshift and was operated 12 h later to gain optimal conditions for such a complex surgical treatment and bypass the nightshift-effect.

DISCUSSION

A review of the literature shows a significant short-term mortality increase on elective procedures performed during the weekend or during the nightshift, however it remains undecisive on the impact of the weekend-effect on emergent procedures.

CONCLUSION

The fortunate recovering of the patient during his hospital stay as well as in the following months emphasizes the importance of critical risk assessment during emergency management, which may justify a delayed surgical treatment.

The provisional extension to induce complete attachment technique is associated with abdominal aortic remodeling and reduces aorta-related adverse events after aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the efficacy of the provisional extension to induce complete attachment (PETTICOAT) technique for type B and postoperative residual type B aortic dissections compared with the conventional thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) technique.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we compared sequential aortic morphologic changes in consecutive patients with type B and postoperative residual type B aortic dissections treated with the PETTICOAT technique between January 2016 and December 2017 with patients treated with the conventional TEVAR between January 2013 and December 2015. Outcomes included aortic remodeling and aorta-related adverse events for 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were included in this study (24 in the PETTICOAT group, 24 patients in the conventional TEVAR group). Although both groups showed aortic remodeling in the descending thoracic aorta, the PETTICOAT group developed significantly better aortic remodeling in the abdominal aorta compared with the conventional TEVAR group during the observation period. The PETTICOAT group had significantly fewer aorta-related adverse events compared with the conventional TEVAR group (8% vs 54%; P < .001). Aorta-related adverse events more commonly occurred in the poor remodeling group compared with in the good remodeling group (P = .001; hazard ratio, 8.32; 95% confidence interval, 2.26-30.64).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the PETTICOAT technique for aortic dissection may promote aortic remodeling and decrease the incidence of aorta-related adverse events. Additional studies are required to confirm these preliminary findings.

Satisfactory Long-term Outcomes of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair With a Bare Stent for Acute Complicated Type B Aortic Dissections

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with a bare stent to those after TEVAR alone in patients with complicated acute type B aortic dissection (cATBAD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective, randomized trial was conducted at 2 medical centers in China between 2010 and 2013. Patients with cATBAD were randomly assigned to receive TEVAR with a bare stent (n=42) or TEVAR only (n=42). Patients were scheduled to undergo computed tomography angiography at 3, 6, and 12 months and then annually to 5 years. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 5 years; secondary outcomes were a composite of complications (endoleak, stent-graft-induced new entry, aortic rupture, and secondary intervention) and aortic remodeling at 1 and 5 years.

RESULTS

All-cause death occurred in 1 (2.4%) patient in the TEVAR with bare stent group (lung cancer) and 5 patients (11.9%) in the TEVAR group (4 aorta-related) during the 5-year follow-up (log-rank p=0.025). The 1- and 5-year rates of complications and secondary interventions did not differ between the groups. Patients in the TEVAR with bare stent group had higher increases in the thoracic true lumen diameter (19.7±3.6 vs 17.0±6.2 mm, p=0.018) and abdominal true lumen diameter (13.7±4.8 vs 7.2±6.1 mm, p<0.001) and a higher incidence of complete false lumen thrombosis (80.9% vs 47.6%, p=0.005) at the 1-year follow-up. However, no between-group differences in the changes of aortic remodeling parameters were observed between the 1- and 5-year follow-up periods.

CONCLUSION

The addition of a distal bare stent to a thoracic stent-graft during TEVAR was associated with significantly improved long-term survival in cATBAD patients vs TEVAR only, likely due to the prevention of true lumen collapse and improvement of complete false lumen thrombosis of the dissected aorta.

Gaussian Surface Curvature Mapping Indicating High Risk Type B Thoracic Aortic Dissections

BACKGROUND

Identifying fragile aortas that are more likely to lead to adverse clinical outcomes would provide surgeons with a better sense of how to balance the risks of surgical versus medical management in patients with type B dissections. We examine the progression of a type B dissection into a type A dissection in a patient and analyze changes in the Gaussian surface curvature distribution, as well as the response of the stress distribution at the lesser curve in response to pressurization. We hypothesize that examining the Gaussian curvature will provide us with a link between aortic surface geometry and the stress distribution, which is crucial to understanding the process driving aortic dissection.

METHODS

Computed tomography scans of a patient before and after the type A dissection are obtained. These are segmented in Simpleware ScanIP. Centerline curvatures are calculated on segmented models in ScanIP. Models are then pressurized in the finite element analysis software Abaqus. The Gaussian curvature is calculated by exporting segmentations into the computational program Matlab and applying a modified previously published algorithm.

RESULTS

The centerlines generated in ScanIP fail to capture the change in the acuity of the lesser curve before and after the type A dissection. Instead, Gaussian curvature analysis shows that the curvature distribution before the type A dissection is much wider compared with the distribution after the type A dissection. In addition, analyzing the stress distribution in response to pressurization reveals that before the type A dissection there is a large divergence in the principal stress vectors at the lesser curve but this transitions to a more uniform hoop stress after the type A dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis demonstrates that Gaussian surface curvature analysis captures changes in aortic geometry that are otherwise silent in centerline curvature analysis. Here, we show that as the aorta develops a type A dissection it is able to more smoothly handle the hoop stress at the lesser curve compared with the stress focusing seen in the before type A geometry. We propose that the geometric focusing before type A creates a higher energy stress state, which is relaxed on retrograde dissection. Thus, Gaussian curvature analysis may provide a window to capture underlying geometric instability in type B dissections.

Floating Stent-Graft as a Support to Bridge an Unfavorable Renal Artery During Postdissection TAAA Repair Using a Multibranched Thoracoabdominal Endograft

Purpose: To report an unusual endovascular technique to manage unfavorable renal artery anatomy encountered in an urgent case of symptomatic postdissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) treated with an off-the-shelf multibranched device. Technique: The technique is demonstrated in a 77-year-old woman who had a history of previous open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and an emergent procedure to implant a thoracic endograft and an aortic bare Z-stent (PETTICOAT) for acute Stanford type B dissection 7 years prior. The patient presented with a symptomatic, rapidly growing, postdissection TAAA. Endovascular treatment with a Zenith t-Branch was planned. After standard catheterization techniques failed in the left renal artery, a bailout maneuver was utilized to place a "floating" Viabahn stent-graft in the aneurysm sac to create sufficient support to deliver the bridging stent-grafts through the bare stent to the target left renal artery. The procedure was successful in excluding the TAAA and preserving perfusion to all target vessels. No neurological complications occurred. Six-month imaging follow-up confirmed the patency of the bridging stents. Conclusion: Remodeling changes after complex endovascular TAAA procedures often require the use of innovative techniques and materials during secondary procedures. In this case, the presence of a post-PETTICOAT bare aortic stent and hostile target artery anatomy increased the technical difficulty of t-Branch implantation. A "floating" stent-graft could be useful to reach challenging target vessels by providing additional support to bridging stent advancement and deployment.

A 10-year study of surgical results of descending aorta aneurysm repair following chronic aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

Patients presenting with descending aortic aneurysms developing after aortic dissection often undergo continued aortic expansion which may require operative interventions to address the risk of aortic rupture. In light of the current advances in various treatment options, including endovascular approaches, we analyzed our experience with open surgical repair (OSR) of aneurysms of the descending aorta following aortic dissection.

METHODS

Patients who underwent open repair for aneurysmal changes of the descending aorta after chronic dissection were retrospectively studied. The 30-day operative mortality rate, midterm survival, and major complications were analyzed. Patients were divided into two categories; primary chronic type B aortic dissection and remnant repaired type A aortic dissection (RTAAD).

RESULTS

There were 149 patients with enlargement of the descending thoracic aorta developing after aortic dissection. Of these, 49 patients had medical management, while the remaining 100 patients received OSR. These patients were included in the present analysis. The 30-day mortality and permanent paraplegia rates were 9% and 4%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 83%, 80.9%, and 76.1%, respectively. The 1- and 5-year survival rates between the primary chronic type B aortic dissection and remnant RTAAD groups showed no significant between-group differences at 86.7% and 84.3%, and 80% and 71.3%, respectively (P = .289). The overall outcomes of other complications such as renal injury, bleeding reoperation, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support showed no significant between-group differences, including an insignificantly higher neurologic complication rate in the remnant RTAAD group. The survival rate in patients with Marfan syndrome was significantly higher than in the patients without Marfan syndrome (P = .033).

CONCLUSIONS

OSR for descending aortic aneurysms developing after chronic aortic dissection showed good early and mid- to long-term outcomes, with acceptably low complication rates. OSR for descending aortic aneurysm after chronic aortic dissection associated with Marfan syndrome also showed good early and mid- to long-term outcomes.

Endovascular Treatment of Descending Thoracic Aortic Pathology: Results of the Regis-TEVAR Study

BACKGROUND

Endovascular techniques have become an essential tool for treatment of thoracic aortic pathology. The objective of this study was to analyze indications and results of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in vascular surgery units, through a retrospective and multicentric national registry called Regis-TEVAR.

METHODS

From 2012 to 2016, a total of 287 patients from 11 vascular surgery units, treated urgently and electively, were recruited consecutively. The primary variables analyzed are mortality, survival, and reintervention rate. The following indications for TEVAR were also analyzed: aortic dissections, thoracic aneurysms, traumatisms, and intramural hematomas or penetrating ulcers, as well as results and postoperative complications in accordance with each indication.

RESULTS

Of the 287 TEVAR performed (239 men, mean age 64.1 ± 14.1 years), 155 were because of aortic aneurysm (54%), 90 because of type B aortic dissection (31.4%), 36 because of traumatic aortic rupture (12.5%), and 6 because of penetrating ulcers or intramural hematomas (2.1%). Overall mortality at 30 days was 11.5% (18.5% in urgent and 5.3% in elective), being higher in dissections (13.3%). The median actuarial survival was 73% at 4 years. The stroke rate was 3.1%, and the rate of spinal cord ischemia was 4.9%. Aortic reoperations were necessary in 23 patients (8.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

This registry provides complete and reliable information on real clinical practice of TEVAR in Spain, with results similar to international series of open surgery. In accordance with these data, TEVAR can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality and with low rates of postoperative complications.

Staged Hybrid Single Lumen Reconstruction (TIGER) in Management of Chronic Symptomatic Complex Type B Aortic Dissection, Techniques, and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Endovascular intervention for chronic symptomatic type B aortic dissection (CS-TBAD) induces aortic wall stress with negative hemodynamic cardiovascular consequences. CS-TBAD risks increased morbidity and mortality due to septum maturation with significant impact on false lumen modulation, and partial lumen thrombosis conveying the worst outcome. The aim of the TIGER technique is total aortic remodeling with true lumen expansion, false lumen regression and complete thrombosis, and stabilization of overall aortic diameter.

METHODS

We report 5 cases of aortic dissection with a mean follow-up of 16 months (6-28 months). All had aneurysmal dilation, with 3 having acute pan aortic dissection and 2 having CS-TBAD. All were managed by sTaged HybrId sinGle lumEn Reconstruction (TIGER). Our first approach was to create one single lumen from the supraceliac, infradiaphragmatic aorta to both common iliac arteries with open surgical patching of the visceral arteries; then, we performed a TEVAR 3 months later.

RESULTS

Three patients required a left subclavian artery chimney graft and one required bilateral subclavian to carotid artery transposition. No spinal drainage was required, and all patients had intraoperative transesophageal echo for wire guidance. We had no aortic rupture or retrograde type A dissection, and we experienced no renal, visceral, cardiac, pulmonary, or spinal complications. All patients, but one, went off their antihypertensive medication. All patients had normal estimated glomerular filtration rate postoperatively, and they all demonstrated accelerated aortic modulation.

CONCLUSIONS

TIGER was not only effective at the semiacute stage to initiate remodeling and prevent malperfusion, it also facilitated a straightforward TEVAR at stage 2, which was made easier by avoiding visceral branch stenting. Moreover, it decreased the length of aortic segment, which was stented, thereby avoiding critical shattering, branch dislodgment, and visceral compromise; spinal ischemia; and negative cardiovascular consequences.

[Treatment of a patient with Crawford type III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm]

Presented herein is a clinical case report regarding hybrid techniques successfully used in a patient suffering from a Crawford type III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm and DeBakey type IIIB aortic dissection. The first stage consisted in endoprosthetic reconstruction of the descending portion of the thoracic aorta, with the second stage including visceral debranching with endoprosthetic reconstruction of the thoracoabdominal portion of the aorta. As the final stage, the patient was subjected to debranching of brachiocephalic arteries, followed by endoprosthetic repair of the aortic arch. The chosen approach made it possible to avoid the use of extracorporeal circulation, aortic occlusion, and, consequently, prolonged postoperative recovery.