Antithrombotic management of atrial fibrillation patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing coronary stenting: executive summary--a Consensus Document of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis, endorsed by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

A Nationwide Population-Based Study for the Recurrence and Comorbidities in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to investigate the cumulative recurrence rate of SSNHL and to determine association between comorbidities and recurrence of SSNHL by comparing patients with and without recurrence.

METHODS

Using the National Health Insurance Claims Database (NHICD) from 2009 to 2020, we conducted a population-based study. We only enrolled patients whose records showed a prescription for steroid and audiometry findings as well as an appropriate diagnostic code. Recurrence of SSNHL was defined as an episode of SSNHL greater than or equal to 3 months after the first episode of SSNHL. We compared the recurrence rate of SSNHL according to age and number of SSNHL recurrences. We also explored comorbidities including autoimmune, metabolic, chronic renal diseases, cancer, and migraine associated with recurrent SSNHL.

RESULTS

A total of 257,123 patients were identified. We found that 6.7% (17,270/257,123) of the patients had at least one recurrence of SSNHL. The recurrence rate increases with the number of recurrences and over time. The incidence per 100,000 people tended to increase with age, and the recurrence rate appeared to decrease with age. We found an increase in the incidence of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and a decrease in the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), myocardial infarction (MI), and hemorrhagic stroke in patients with recurrence.

CONCLUSION

For patients with recurrence or AS, considerable efforts should be made to prevent recurrence. As SSNHL is an emergent otologic condition, when symptoms occur, they should receive immediate treatment. Additional well-designed population-based studies are required to generalize our results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:1417-1425, 2024.

Feasibility of concomitant left atrial appendage closure and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation: a randomized pilot study

The optimal approach for prevention of cardiovascular events and reduction of bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and atrial fibrillation (AF) is still controversial. The aim of our study is to asses our single-center experience with concomitant left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). 50 patients with ACS without ST elevation and history of AF were randomized after successful PCI to LAAO or conventional medical therapy. The primary endpoints were safety and length of hospitalization. The follow-up period was 30 days. The mean procedural times were 113 ± 23 min PCI + LAAO implantation and 39 ± 19 min of PCI only (p < 0.001), while mean fluoroscopy times were 18 ± 8 min and 12 ± 8 min (p < 0.001), respectively. No procedure-related complications were observed. There was no difference observed for length of hospitalization between two groups. LAAO in patients with ACS and AF undergoing PCI appears safe.

ANMCO position paper on antithrombotic treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing intracoronary stenting and/or acute coronary syndromes

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with or without acute coronary syndromes (ACS) represent a subgroup with a challenging pharmacological management. Indeed, if on the one hand, antithrombotic therapy should reduce the risk related to recurrent ischaemic events and/or stent thrombosis; on the other hand, care must be taken to avoid major bleeding events. In recent years, several trials, which overall included more than 12 000 patients, have been conducted demonstrating the safety of different therapeutic combinations of oral antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents. In the present ANMCO position paper, we propose a decision-making algorithm on antithrombotic strategies based on scientific evidence and expert consensus to be adopted in the periprocedural phase, at the time of hospital discharge, and in the long-term follow-up of patients with AF undergoing PCI with/without ACS.

CHA2 DS2 -VASc impact on risk following percutaneous coronary intervention in atrial fibrillation

AIMS

In 2010, the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on atrial fibrillation (AF) introduced the CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score to guide initiation of oral anticoagulation. In patients with AF undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), triple therapy with oral anticoagulation and dual antiplatelet therapy was recommended to reduce ischaemic risk. We examined how the CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score impacted oral anticoagulation use and risks of ischaemic and hospitalized bleeding events in patients with AF undergoing PCI.

METHODS

We included 6,014 patients with AF undergoing first-time PCI in Western Denmark between 2003 and 2017. We divided patients into four groups based on year of PCI and estimated 1-year risks of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and hospitalization for bleeding.

RESULTS

The proportion of oral anticoagulation users was 48% in 2003-2006 and 49% in 2006-2010. Following the CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score implementation, the proportion increased to 59% in 2011-2014 and 77% in 2015-2017. Using 2003-2006 as reference, risks of MACE were similar in 2007-2010 (adjusted relative risk [RR_adj ] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-1.18) and 2011-2014 (RR_adj 0.92, 95% CI 0.78-1.09), but declined by 23% in 2015-2017 (RR_adj 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.92). Hospitalizations for bleeding did not increase despite wider use of triple therapy.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score in the 2010 European guidelines on AF was associated with an increased utilization of oral anticoagulation and triple therapy among AF patients undergoing PCI. These changes were associated with a gradual decline in the risk of MACE, while the risk of hospitalized bleeding remained unchanged.

Increasing Use of Anticoagulants in Germany and Its Impact on Hospitalization for Tooth Extraction

OBJECTIVES

 This article aimed to compare nationwide time trends of oral anticoagulant prescriptions with the time trend of hospitalization for tooth extraction (TE) in Germany from 2006 through 2017.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 We derived the annual number of hospital admissions for TE from the Nationwide Hospital Referral File of the Federal Bureau of Statistics and defined daily doses (DDD) of prescribed anticoagulants in outpatients from reports of the drug information system of the statutory health insurance.

RESULTS

 From 2005 to 2017, annual oral anticoagulation (OAC) treatment rates increased by 143.7%. In 2017, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) represented 57.1% of all OAC treatments. The number of cases hospitalized for TE increased by 28.0 only. From all the cases hospitalized for TE in Germany in 2006, 14.2% had a documented history of long-term use of OACs. This proportion increased to 19.6% in 2017. Age-standardized hospitalization rates for all TE cases with long-term use of OACs increased from 6.6 in 2006 to 10.5 cases per 100,000 person-years in 2014 and remained almost unchanged thereafter.

CONCLUSION

 Our comparison showed that the large increase in OAC treatment rates in general from 2006 to 2017 had only a small impact on hospitalized TE cases with long-term use of OAC which flattens since 2014.

Antithrombosis stewardship efforts to de-escalate inappropriate combined therapy in outpatient clinics

Antithrombotic therapies include anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents. It is increasingly recognized that combined dual antithrombotic (DAT, which consists of an oral anticoagulant and a single antiplatelet) and triple antithrombotic therapies (TAT, which consists of an oral anticoagulant and two antiplatelets) increase bleeding risk. Additionally, the benefit of aspirin for primary prevention has been called into question by a number of randomized controlled trials over the last few years. As such, several recent clinical trials have explored de-escalated antithrombotic regimens that have resulted in less bleeding with similar efficacy. Our study was a retrospective, observational investigation assessing the effect of a systematic antithrombosis stewardship intervention implemented in outpatient, pharmacy-driven antithrombosis clinics on the number of patients receiving potentially inappropriate combined antithrombotic therapy. Pharmacists identified anticoagulation patients on concomitant antiplatelet therapy, assessed for appropriateness, and performed interventions if needed. Of the 875 patients included, 261 (29.8%) were on combined antithrombotic therapy, 48 (18.4%) of which were deemed inappropriate at baseline. By the end of the intervention period, 45 (93%) of these patients had a de-escalation in combined therapy (p < 0.001). We found that a systematic de-escalation protocol led to a significant reduction in patients on inappropriate combined antithrombotic therapy.

Dual-Pathway Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Single-Center, Single-Operator, Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: There is limited data evaluating the prescription practices for antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) following elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Objective: This single-center, single-operator, retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate trends of antithrombotic treatment strategies in patients with AF undergoing elective PCI.

Methods: Patients with AF who electively underwent PCI performed by a single interventionalist between April 2013 and May 2018 were identified. The primary outcome was the antithrombotic therapy at discharge assessed by chart review: triple (TAT, triple antithrombotic therapy) or dual (DAT, dual antithrombotic therapy) antithrombotic therapy and vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC), respectively.

Results: Of 6,135 screened patients, 259 met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 133 (51%) patients received NOAC- and 126 (49%) VKA-therapy. Compared with patients on NOAC therapy, patients treated with VKA had higher bleeding risk (mean HAS-BLED-Score; 2.3 vs. 2.0; p = 0.02) and more co-morbidities (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min, 11 vs. 4%; p = 0.04; diabetes mellitus, 33 vs. 20%; p = 0.03; history of previous PCI, 37 vs. 21%; p < 0.01). TAT was prescribed more frequently if the prescription included VKA compared with NOAC (61 vs. 41%; p < 0.01). Prescription of TAT and VKA decreased throughout the observed period (2013: 100% vs. 2018: 6%; p < 0.01 and 2013: 91% vs. 2018: 28%; p < 0.01).

Conclusion: These observational data from a single center registry show a decrease of TAT- and VKA- prescription in favor of DAT with NOAC. Whether these observations are consistent with national or global trends should to be evaluated in further studies.

Increasing use of anticoagulants in Germany and its impact on hospitalization rates for genitourinary bleeding

The aim of the study was to compare nationwide time trends of prescribed oral anticoagulants (OAC) with the time trend of genitourinary bleedings (GUB) in Germany from 2005 through 2016. The annual numbers of hospitalized patients with GUB coded as "hematuria", "excessive, frequent and irregular menstruation", "postmenopausal bleeding" or "abnormal uterine and vaginal bleeding" were extracted from the nationwide hospitalization file by the Federal Bureau of Statistics. Hospitalization rates were age-standardized using the German standard population 2011. Defined daily doses (DDD) of prescribed anticoagulants among outpatients for the same calendar period were extracted from reports of the statutory health insurance drug information system. Based on DDD, drug treatment rates per 100,000 person years (py) were calculated. From 2005 to 2016, annual OAC treatment rates per 100,000 py increased by 135.8% (from 901.4 to 2125.9). Until 2011 direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) represented less than 0.1% of all OAC, but 49.9% in 2016. In the same period age-standardized rates of hospitalizations for hematuria increased continuously (annual change of 1.03 (95% CI 0.94-1.11) per 100,000 py), that of "postmenopausal" (- 1.93; 95% CI - 2.38 to - 1.49) or "excessive, frequent and irregular menstruation" decreased (- 1.25; 95% CI -1.62 to - 0.87) and that of "abnormal uterine and vaginal haemorrhage" remained almost unchanged. From all cases with hematuria 5.3% received at least 1 red blood cell concentrate (RBC) in 2005 and 8.2% in 2016 whereas all cases with the other three types of bleeding counted for 1.9% in 2005 and 3.8% in 2016. The time trends for GUB in all subgroups changed steadily and showed no effect of the disproportional increase of DAOCs until 2011. Our ecologic nationwide comparison of OAC treatment rates in outpatients and hospitalization rates for GUBs revealed that despite increasing OAC treatment rates from 2011 to 2016 the hospitalization rates for GUB showed steady annual changes unaffected by the increasing prescription rates of DOACs since 2011.

Effect of Renal Dysfunction on the Risks for Ischemic and Bleeding Events in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

There is a paucity of studies exploring whether the ischemia-bleeding trade-off could be different according to the stages of renal dysfunction in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among 19,598 patients in a pooled database from 3 Japanese PCI studies (CREDO-Kyoto Cohort-2, RESET, and NEXT), 1,547 patients had concomitant AF. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to their renal function (Creatinine clearance [CCr] >60 ml/min: n = 703, 60≥ CCr >30 ml/min: n = 627, CCr ≤30 ml/min: n = 126, Dialysis: n = 91). The cumulative 3-year incidences of both the primary ischemic (ischemic stroke/myocardial infarction) and bleeding (GUSTO moderate/severe) outcome increased incrementally with worsening renal function (11.4%, 12.6%, 16.8%, and 31.7%, p <0.001, and 7.5%, 14.9%, 26.3%, and 29.5%, p <0.001, respectively). Compared with CCr >60 ml/min group, the excess adjusted risk for the primary ischemic outcome was significant only in dialysis group (hazards ratio [HR] 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22 to 3.69, p = 0.009), but not in 60≥ CCr >30 ml/min and CCr ≤30 ml/min groups (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.29, p = 0.54, and HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.69, p = 0.83, respectively), whereas the excess adjusted risk for the primary bleeding outcome was significant in all 3 groups of renal dysfunction (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.45, p = 0.01, HR 2.70, 95% CI 1.58 to 4.61, p <0.001, and HR 3.26, 95% CI 1.85 to 5.75, p <0.001, respectively). In conclusion, in AF patients receiving PCI, the worsening renal function was strongly associated with the increasingly higher risk for bleeding events, whereas the excess risk for ischemic events was significant only in patients on dialysis.

Antithrombotic therapy in acute coronary syndrome and stable coronary artery disease patients with atrial fibrillation: a 3-year retrospective cohort study

Aim: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) occur frequently in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the optimal antithrombotic therapy is still debated. Methods & results: We analyzed 976 coronary artery disease patients with AF from 2013 to 2014. ACS+AF patients tend to take dual antiplatelet therapy (p < 0.001), whereas SCAD+AF patients prefer anticoagulation therapy (warfarin: p < 0.001, dabigatran: p < 0.05). Ventricular arrhythmia, congestive heart failure and ACS were the top three reasons for SCAD group patients' readmission, while reinfarction and congestive heart failure were two major factors in readmission of ACS group. Conclusion: ACS+AF group patients more likely choose dual antiplatelet therapy, whereas SCAD+AF group patients prefer anticoagulation therapy. Compared with ACS group, SCAD group had a higher rate of readmission.

Increasing use of anticoagulants in Germany and its impact on hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to compare nationwide time trends of oral anticoagulant prescriptions with the time trend of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in Germany from 2005 through 2016.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The annual number of hospital admissions for GIB associated with gastric ulcers, duodenal ulcers, hematemesis, melena, hematochezia, and unspecified gastrointestinal bleeding (USGIH) was taken from the nationwide hospital referral file by the Federal Bureau of Statistics. The hospitalization rates were age-standardized using the German Standard Population 2011. The defined daily doses (DDD) of prescribed anticoagulants in outpatients for the same calendar period were taken from reports of the drug information system of the statutory health insurance. Based on DDD, drug treatment rates were calculated per 100,000 people.

RESULTS

From 2005 to 2016, the annual anticoagulant prescription rates per 100,000 persons increased by 135.8% (from 901.4 to 2125.9). By 2011, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) accounted for <0.1% of all anticoagulants, but 49.9% in 2016. Over the same period, age-standardized hospital admissions for GIBs per 100,000 person-years decreased by 14% (from 128.89 to 110.87). Hospitalization rates for gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer decreased steadily, and those for hematoma, melena and hematochezia continued to increase. Only the USGIH decreased from 2005 to 2011 (annual change of -3.35 (95% CI -5.44; -1.25) per 100,000 person-years) and subsequently increased (0.61, 95% CI -0,42; 1.65). Of all GIB cases, 5.8% received at least 6 red blood cell concentrates in 2005 and 4.6% in 2016. The two-phase time trend for USGIH was no longer present in this subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Our nationwide comparison of outpatient OAC treatment rates and hospitalization rates for GIBs showed that GIB hospitalization rates declined despite increasing OAC treatment rates from 2005 to 2016. With increasing impact of DOACs after 2011, this decline was not affected.

Triple, dual, and single antithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), concomitant coronary artery disease is often present, and vice versa. Although both AF and coronary artery disease need antithrombotic therapy to reduce ischemic events, optimal antithrombotic regimens for patients with AF undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain unclear. Triple therapy, a combination of oral anticoagulant plus dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and P2Y₁₂ inhibitor, has been used for patients with AF undergoing PCI as an initial antithrombotic strategy in the recent decade. However, triple therapy is well-known to induce severe bleeding events. Recently, several clinical trials have been published and guideline recommendations have been updated. This review article summarizes current evidence concerning antithrombotic therapy in patients with AF undergoing PCI.

Triple therapy: A review of antithrombotic treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), concomitant coronary artery disease is often present, and vice versa. Optimal antithrombotic treatment for patients with AF undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is one of the major concerns in the field of cardiology. Triple therapy, a combination of oral anticoagulant (OAC) plus dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and P2Y₁₂ inhibitor, has been used for patients with AF undergoing PCI in recent decades to reduce ischemic events under guideline recommendations. However, triple therapy is well-known to induce severe bleeding events. Recently, the results of several clinical trials have been published, and the latest guidelines recommend that most patients should undergo dual therapy (i.e. OAC plus P2Y₁₂ inhibitor) from the beginning of PCI, or triple therapy only peri-PCI period and immediately shift to dual therapy after hospital discharge. Although these recommendations are useful and appear to be reasonable, no studies have validated this. In addition, there are a number of unresolved issues regarding the antithrombotic treatment for patients with AF undergoing PCI such as risk prediction models and the best combination of OAC with antiplatelet agents, and prospective trials are ongoing. This review article will summarize current evidence and focus on the optimal regimen of antithrombotic treatment for patients with AF undergoing PCI.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Oral Anticoagulation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The optimal antithrombotic treatment regimen for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation represents a challenge in clinical practice. In 2016, an updated opinion of selected experts from the United States and Canada on the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention was reported. After the 2016 North American consensus statement on the management of antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, results of pivotal clinical trials assessing the type of oral anticoagulant agent and the duration of antiplatelet treatment have been published. On the basis of these results, this focused update on the antithrombotic management of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention recommends that a non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant be preferred over a vitamin K antagonist as the oral anticoagulant of choice. Moreover, a double-therapy regimen (oral anticoagulant plus single antiplatelet therapy with a P2Y 12 inhibitor) by the time of hospital discharge should be considered for most patients, whereas extending the use of aspirin beyond hospital discharge (ie, triple therapy) should be considered only for selected patients at high ischemic/thrombotic and low bleeding risks and for a limited period of time. The present document provides a focused updated on the rationale for the new expert consensus–derived recommendations on the antithrombotic management of patients with atrial fibrillation treated with oral anticoagulation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Trends in Atrial Fibrillation and Prescription of Oral Anticoagulants and Embolic Strokes in Germany

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare trends in frequency of atrial fibrillation (AF) with the prescription rates of oral anticoagulants (OAC) and the incidence of embolic stroke (ES) from 2005 through 2014.

METHODS

Annual numbers of hospitalized patients with AF and ES were extracted from the Federal Bureau of Statistics. Defined daily doses (DDD) of prescribed OAC among outpatients were extracted from the insurance drug information system.

RESULTS

The number of cases hospitalized with the diagnosis AF increased continuously by 78.3% (1.25 Million in 2005 to 2.19 Million in 2014, p < 0.001), likewise frequency of ES increased by 89.0% (from 46,068 to 87,050, p < 0.001) and the number of prescribed DDD of OAC almost doubled by 105.4% (from 271,328 to 557,281, p < 0.001). There is an almost linear correlation between occurrence of AF and ES (R² = 0.9683). In contrast association between prescription rate of OAC and incidence of ES is not linear as there was a disproportional increase in OAC prescriptions beginning in the year 2010 that is not accompanied by a reduction of cases hospitalized with ES.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis of drug treatment rates for OAC in outpatients and hospitalization rates for ES revealed a disproportional increase in prescription of OAC beginning in the year 2010 that does not affect the number of cases hospitalized with ES.

The concurrent use of antithrombotic therapies and the risk of bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often receive, in addition to warfarin, antithrombotic drugs to manage other comorbid conditions. To date, few population-based studies have quantified the bleeding risk associated with the concurrent use of these therapies. The United Kingdom General Practice Research Database was used to identify a cohort of 70,760 patients newly-diagnosed with AF between 1993 and 2008. A nested case-control analysis was conducted within that cohort, and conditional logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted rate ratios (RRs) of bleeding associated with current use of warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel in single therapy, as well as in dual and triple therapy, as compared with non-use of any therapy. A total of 10,850 patients experienced a bleeding event during follow-up. In single therapy, warfarin was associated with the highest increased risk (RR: 2.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.95–2.23), followed by clopidogrel (RR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.37–1.81) and aspirin (RR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.17–1.34). In dual therapy, combinations containing warfarin were associated with a higher increased risk (warfarin-aspirin: RR: 2.87, 95% CI: 2.58–3.19, and warfarin-clopidogrel: RR: 2.74, 95% CI: 2.14–3.51), than those not containing warfarin (aspirin-clopidogrel: RR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.44–1.97). Triple therapy of warfarin-aspirin-clopidogrel was associated with the highest increased risk (RR: 3.75, 95% CI: 2.71–5.19). This large population-based study suggests that while all antithrombotic therapies are associated with an elevated risk of bleeding, the risks increase in an additive fashion with dual and triple therapy, particularly in combinations containing warfarin.

Transient atrial fibrillation and risk of stroke after acute myocardial infarction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a frequent complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In the AMI setting, AF is frequently brief and attributed to acute haemodynamic changes, inflammation or ischaemia. However, it remains uncertain whether transient AF episodes are associated with a subsequent increased risk of ischaemic stroke. We studied the impact of transient new-onset AF on the one-year risk of ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in a retrospective cohort of 2,402 patients with AMI. Patients with previous AF or AF at hospital discharge were excluded. Transient AF occurred in 174 patients (7.2%) during the initial hospitalisation. During one year follow-up after hospital discharge, stroke or TIA occurred in 16 (9.2%) and 58 (2.6%) patients with and without transient AF, respectively (p< 0.0001). Compared with patients without transient AF, the adjusted hazard ratio for stroke or TIA in patients with transient AF was 3.03 (95% CI 1.73–5.32; p< 0.0001). Stroke or TIA occurred in 2.6% of patients without AF, 6.3% of patients with transient AF treated with oral anticoagulants, and 9.9% of patients with transient AF treated with antiplatelet agents. The incidence of recurrent AF after hospital discharge was markedly higher in patients with transient AF during the index hospitalisation (22.8% vs. 2.0%, p< 0.0001). In conclusion, transient AF complicating AMI is associated with an increased future risk of ischaemic stroke and TIA, particularly in patients treated with antiplatelet agents alone. High AF recurrence rates in these patients also suggest that oral anticoagulants should be strongly considered.

Mild kidney disease as a risk factor for major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary stenting

Bleeding risk is increased in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and moderate to severe kidney disease (KD); however, the implication of mild KD on bleeding remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether the presence of mild KD increases risk for major bleeding (MB) in patients with AF undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation (PCI-S). Two hundred eighty-five patients were included. Patients were classified into three kidney function groups: moderate to severe KD (n=91; <60 ml/min/1.73 m2), mild KD (n=139; 60–89 ml/min/1.73 m2) and non-KD (n=55; ≥90 ml/min/1.73 m2). Estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. Patients were followed for one year, and the occurrence of MB was obtained in all. A total of 28 patients (9.8%) presented MB. MB complications examined as a function of KD groups revealed that there was a graded increase in MB with worsening renal function (non KD=1.8%, mild KD=7.9%, moderate to severe KD=17.6%; p <0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that mild KD was associated with nearly a 2.5-fold (2.43 95% confidence interval 1.11–5.34, p=0.039) increase in the risk of MB as compared with non-KD patients. Other independent predictors of MB were moderate-severe KD, anaemia and triple antithrombotic therapy after PCI-S (C-index=0.76). In this population, mild KD confers a significantly increase in the risk for MB complications. Future studies should assess the potential role of incorporating mild KD into the bleeding risk scales to improve the stratification of these patients.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A North American Perspective-2016 Update

The optimal antithrombotic treatment regimen for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation is an emerging clinical problem. Currently, there is limited evidenced-based data on the optimal antithrombotic treatment regimen, including antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies, for these high-risk patients with practice guidelines, thus, providing limited recommendations. Over the past years, expert consensus documents have provided guidance to clinicians on how to manage patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Given the recent advancements in the field, the current document provides an updated opinion of selected North American experts from the United States and Canada on the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. In particular, this document provides the current views on (1) embolic/stroke risk, (2) ischemic/thrombotic cardiac risk, and (3) bleeding risk, which are pivotal for discerning the choice of antithrombotic therapy. In addition, we describe the recent advances in pharmacology, stent designs, and clinical trials relevant to the field. Ultimately, we provide expert consensus-derived recommendations, using a pragmatic approach, on the management of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Use of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy and Patient Outcomes in Those Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The ROCKET AF Trial

OBJECTIVES

The authors assessed the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation).

BACKGROUND

The frequency, patterns, and outcomes when adding DAPT to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in the setting of PCI in patients with AF are largely unknown.

METHODS

The study population included all patients in the treatment group of the ROCKET AF trial divided by the receipt of PCI during follow-up. Clinical characteristics, PCI frequency, and rates of DAPT were reported. Clinical outcomes were adjudicated independently as part of the trial.

RESULTS

Among 14,171 patients, 153 (1.1%) underwent PCI during a median 806 days of follow-up. Patients treated with rivaroxaban were significantly less likely to undergo PCI compared with warfarin-treated patients (61 vs. 92; p = 0.01). Study drug was continued during PCI in 81% of patients. Long-term DAPT (≥30 days) was used in 37% and single antiplatelet therapy in 34%. A small number switched from DAPT to monotherapy within 30 days of PCI (n = 19 [12.3%]) and 15% of patients received no antiplatelet therapy after PCI. Rates of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding events were high in post-PCI patients (4.5/100 patient-years and 10.2/100 patient-years) in both treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AF at moderate to high risk for stroke, PCI occurred in <1% per year. DAPT was used in a variable manner, with the majority of patients remaining on study drug after PCI. Rates of both thrombotic and bleeding events were high after PCI, highlighting the need for studies to determine the optimal antithrombotic therapy.

Efficacy and safety of triple versus dual antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation and ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The optimal antithrombotic regimen for patients with atrial fibrillation and ischemic heart disease remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of triple therapy (TT [an anticoagulant and 2 antiplatelet drugs]) with dual therapy (DAPT [2 antiplatelet drugs] or DT [an anticoagulant and a single antiplatelet drug]) in patients with atrial fibrillation and ischemic heart disease. We systematically searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed and Embase databases for all relevant studies up to August 2017. The overall risk estimates were calculated using the random-effects model. A total of 17 observational studies were included. Regarding the efficacy outcomes, no differences were observed between the triple therapy and the dual therapy for all-cause death, cardiovascular death, or thrombotic complications (i.e., acute coronary syndrome, stent thrombosis, thromboembolism/stroke, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events). Regarding the safety outcomes, compared with DAPT, TT was associated with increased risks of major bleeding (a relative risk of 1.96 [1.40–2.74]), minor bleeding (1.69 [1.06–2.71]) and overall bleeding (1.80 [1.23–2.64]). Compared wtih DT, TT was associated with a greater risk of major bleeding (1.65 [1.23–2.21]), but rates of minor bleeding (0.99 [0.56–1.77]) and overall bleeding (1.14 [0.76–1.71]) were similar. Overall, TT confers an increased hazard of major bleeding with no thromboembolic protection compared with dual therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and ischemic heart disease.

Outcomes of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing in prevalence, and patients with a history of AF commonly undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There is a paucity of contemporary data on the association between AF and clinical outcomes after PCI.

OBJECTIVES

The study sought to evaluate the association between AF and in-hospital adverse outcomes using a large, prospective multicenter registry.

METHODS

Data for consecutive PCI cases from 47 hospitals performed between April 2011 and December 2014 were utilized for the analysis. Propensity-matched multivariate analysis was used to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics between patients with and without a history of AF.

RESULTS

Of 113,283 PCI cases during the study period, a history of AF was present in 13,912 patients (12%), which varied by institution (range 2.5% to 18.4%). At baseline, patients with a history of AF were older and were more likely to have comorbid congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, cerebrovascular disease, and chronic lung disease. Patients with a history of AF were more likely to have in-hospital complications, including in-hospital mortality (3% vs. 1%). In propensity-matched analysis, patients with a history of AF were more likely to be treated with a bare-metal stent (27% vs. 18%). In the propensity-matched model, AF remained independently associated with an increased risk of developing post-procedural bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15 to 1.52), heart failure (OR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.52), cardiogenic shock (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.48), and in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.68).

CONCLUSIONS

AF is common among patients undergoing PCI. AF is associated with older age, the presence of other comorbidities, and independently associated with in-hospital post-procedural heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and mortality.

Reduced duration of dual antiplatelet therapy using an improved drug-eluting stent for percutaneous coronary intervention of the left main artery in a real-world, all-comer population: Rationale and study design of the prospective randomized multicenter IDEAL-LM trial

BACKGROUND

Continuous improvements in stent technology make percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) a potential alternative to surgery in selected patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (uLMCA) disease. The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in these patients remains undetermined, and in addition, new stent designs using a bioabsorbable polymer might allow shorter duration of DAPT.

STUDY DESIGN

IDEAL-LM is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study that will enroll 818 patients undergoing uLMCA PCI. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to intravascular ultrasound-guided PCI with the novel everolimus-eluting platinum-chromium Synergy stent with a biodegradable polymer (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) followed by 4 months of DAPT or the everolimus-eluting cobalt-chromium Xience stent (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) followed by 12 months of DAPT. The total follow-up period will be 5 years. A subset of 100 patients will undergo optical coherence tomography at 3 months.

END POINTS

The primary end point will be major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization) at 2 years. Secondary end points will consist of the individual components of the primary end point, procedural success, a device-oriented composite end point, stent thrombosis as per Academic Research Consortium criteria, and bleeding as per Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria.

SUMMARY

IDEAL-LM is designed to assess the safety and efficacy of the novel Synergy stent followed by 4 months of DAPT vs the Xience stent followed by 12 months of DAPT in patients undergoing uLMCA PCI. The study will provide novel insights regarding optimal treatment strategy for patients undergoing PCI of uLMCA disease (www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT 02303717).

Safety and efficacy of anti-thrombotic regimens in patients with percutaneous coronary intervention requiring oral anticoagulation: A traditional and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous reports have been inconsistent in generating a consensus for optimal treatment strategy for patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who also require oral anticoagulation (OAC). We conducted a traditional and network meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anti-thrombotic regimens in this subset of patients.

METHODS

30 articles were recovered through preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials (CENTRAL) from inception to December 2016.

RESULTS

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was found to be the safest treatment modality when compared to triple therapy (TT) or combination of OAC and single antiplatelet agent (OAC+SAP) [Major bleeding: (DAPT vs OAC+SAP: odds ratio (OR), 0.53; 95% credible interval (CrI), 0.30-0.91) (DAPT vs TT: OR, 0.45; 95% CrI, 0.31-0.64)]. There were no significant differences in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), cardiovascular (CV) or total survival, stent thrombosis or target vessel revascularization (TVR) amongst the three treatment arms. TT was ranked superior for stroke reduction (SUCRA, 69%) followed by OAC+SAP and DAPT. When traditional analysis was adjusted for randomized data, OAC+SAP was equivalent to TT with regards to stroke (OR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.38-1.46; p=0.39) and showed significant reduction in MACE and total mortality.

CONCLUSION

DAPT was found to be the safest and equally effective regimen when compared to TT and OAC+SAP. However this strategy bears considerable risk to patients with high thromboembolic risk. This issue can be encountered by using OAC+SAP as an alternative of TT in patients with intermediate to high stroke risk and intermediate to high bleeding propensity.

Inadequate stroke prevention in Korean atrial fibrillation patients in the post-warfarin era

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulation therapy with warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is recommended for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who are at a high risk for stroke. This study aimed to investigate the utilization of anticoagulants since the introduction of DOACs in South Korea.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study using claim-based national data from 2011 to 2014 derived from the Aged Patient Sample (APS) compiled by the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA). Patients with a high risk for thromboembolism were identified as those having a CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age≥75, diabetes mellitus, stroke (or transient ischemic attack), vascular disease, sex) score of ≥2. Patients at a high risk for bleeding with an ATRIA (anticoagulation and risk factors in atrial fibrillation) bleeding score of >4 were excluded. Anticoagulant underutilization was estimated in these high-risk patients. Demographic and clinical factors associated with warfarin and DOAC underutilization were explored using a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Anticoagulant underutilization among high-risk patients for stroke decreased from 68% to 62.5% between 2011 and 2014; however, there was further scope for improvement. The risk factors for underutilization were identified as follows: female sex, old age, having medical aid insurance, presence of vascular disease, and limited anticoagulant options.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that a large population of AF patients in South Korea failed to obtain adequate stroke prevention treatment, even in the era of DOAC usage. A more aggressive approach to provide optimal antithrombotic therapy is warranted.

Endoscopy in patients on antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy, including direct oral anticoagulants: British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guidelines

The risk of endoscopy in patients on antithrombotics depends on the risks of procedural haemorrhage versus thrombosis due to discontinuation of therapy. P2Y12 RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS CLOPIDOGREL, PRASUGREL, TICAGRELOR: For low-risk endoscopic procedures we recommend continuing P2Y12 receptor antagonists as single or dual antiplatelet therapy (low quality evidence, strong recommendation); For high-risk endoscopic procedures in patients at low thrombotic risk, we recommend discontinuing P2Y12 receptor antagonists five days before the procedure (moderate quality evidence, strong recommendation). In patients on dual antiplatelet therapy, we suggest continuing aspirin (low quality evidence, weak recommendation). For high-risk endoscopic procedures in patients at high thrombotic risk, we recommend continuing aspirin and liaising with a cardiologist about the risk/benefit of discontinuation of P2Y12 receptor antagonists (high quality evidence, strong recommendation).

WARFARIN

The advice for warfarin is fundamentally unchanged from British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) 2008 guidance.

DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS DOAC

For low-risk endoscopic procedures we suggest omitting the morning dose of DOAC on the day of the procedure (very low quality evidence, weak recommendation); For high-risk endoscopic procedures, we recommend that the last dose of DOAC be taken ≥48 h before the procedure (very low quality evidence, strong recommendation). For patients on dabigatran with CrCl (or estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR) of 30-50 mL/min we recommend that the last dose of DOAC be taken 72 h before the procedure (very low quality evidence, strong recommendation). In any patient with rapidly deteriorating renal function a haematologist should be consulted (low quality evidence, strong recommendation).

Managing Antiplatelet Therapy and Anticoagulants in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Atrial Fibrillation

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is essential in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Interestingly coronary artery disease coexists in 20-30% of these patients.[1,2] Balancing the risk of bleeding and thromboembolism is very important for the management of patients on OAC, especially than when such patients require percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Lack of data and clear societal guidelines for peri-procedural and post-procedural management of anticoagulated patients has resulted in diverse clinical practices among clinicians, hospitals, and countries. Furthermore with expanding number of available oral antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents, the uncertainty regarding optimal combination therapy in this growing pool of the patients with overlapping clinical indications is also growing. Given the high proportion of patients with atherothrombosis and requiring OAC for conditions particularly like AF, it is important that physicians are aware of the clinical implications and management of these overlapping syndromes. In this article we discuss; this evolving dilemma of peri-procedural and post-procedural management of anticoagulated patient's, burden of the disease, available data, risk factors that could identify high risk patients and propose a well-balanced management strategy.

Efficacy and safety of antithrombotic regimens after coronary intervention in patients on oral anticoagulation: Traditional and Bayesian meta-analysis of clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of diverse antithrombotic regimens in patients on long-term anticoagulation after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

After searching electronic database (up to 27 June 2015), we included trials comparing dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel), oral anticoagulant (OAC) plus clopidogrel, OAC plus aspirin, or triple therapy (OAC with clopidogrel and aspirin). Efficacy outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and all-cause mortality; safety outcomes included major bleeding and any bleeding. We conducted both traditional and Bayesian network meta-analysis, computing pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to compare diverse antithrombotic therapies simultaneously.

RESULTS

Eighteen trials were included in the quantitative analysis. OAC plus clopidogrel and triple therapy were associated with a lower risk of MACE, ischemic stroke, MI and all-cause mortality compared with dual antiplatelet or OAC plus aspirin regimens. OAC plus clopidogrel was ranked the most efficacious option without an increase in bleeding episodes. However, triple therapy improved the efficacy outcomes at the expense of increasing hemorrhage. For the initial short-term outcomes, OAC plus clopidogrel inconclusively reduced the risk of MACE and had a significantly lower risk of any bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

OAC plus clopidogrel may be the optimal antithrombotic therapy in patients on oral anticoagulation undergoing PCI, which has equal or better efficacy outcomes without increasing the rates of bleeding episodes. Moreover, we found initial triple therapy to be unnecessary as it increased the risk of bleeding.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remain life-threatening disorders, which are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events in patients with ACS. However, there is substantial inter-individual variability in the response to clopidogrel treatment, in addition to prolonged recovery of platelet reactivity as a result of irreversible binding to P2Y12 receptors. This high inter-individual variability in treatment response has primarily been associated with genetic polymorphisms in the genes encoding for cytochrome (CYP) 2C19, which affect the pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel. While the US Food and Drug Administration has issued a boxed warning for CYP2C19 poor metabolizers because of potentially reduced efficacy in these patients, results from multivariate analyses suggest that additional factors, including age, sex, obesity, concurrent diseases and drug-drug interactions, may all contribute to the overall between-subject variability in treatment response. However, the extent to which each of these factors contributes to the overall variability, and how they are interrelated, is currently unclear. The objective of this review article is to provide a comprehensive update on the different factors that influence the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel and how they mechanistically contribute to inter-individual differences in the response to clopidogrel treatment.

Effective practical management of patients with atrial fibrillation when using new oral anticoagulants

Practical management of stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) requires physicians to find the optimal balance between maximizing prevention of ischaemic stroke and minimizing the risk of bleeding. Vitamin K antagonists have traditionally been used for stroke prevention in patients with AF; however, they have been associated with increased risk of bleeding, particularly intracranial haemorrhage. New oral anticoagulants (OACs) have shown similar efficacy to the vitamin K antagonist warfarin but with a reduced risk of bleeding, particularly life-threatening bleeding such as intracranial haemorrhage. Decisions about which new OAC therapy to use may be influenced by patient characteristics such as age, renal function, co-medication use, and bleeding risk. This review uses a case-based approach to highlight the practical management issues to be considered by the physician when selecting a new OAC for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF.

Renal Impairment and Prognosis of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Coronary Intervention - The AFCAS Trial

BACKGROUND

Renal impairment is a well-known risk factor for cardiovascular complications, but the effect of different stages of renal impairment on thrombotic/thromboembolic and bleeding complications in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains largely unknown. We sought to evaluate the incidence and clinical impact of four stages of renal impairment in patients with AF undergoing PCI.

METHODS

We assessed renal function by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and outcomes in 781 AF patients undergoing PCI by using the data from a prospective European multicenter registry. End-points included all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and bleeding events at 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 195 (25%) patients had normal renal function (eGFR ≥90 mL/min), 290 (37%) mild renal impairment (eGFR 60-89), 263 (34%) moderate renal impairment (eGFR 30-59) and 33 (4%) severe renal impairment (eGFR <30). Degree of renal impairment remained an independent predictor of mortality and MACCE in an adjusted a Cox regression model. Even patients with mild renal impairment had a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 2.25, 95%CI 1.02-4.98, p=0.04) and borderline risk for MACCE (HR 1.56, 95%CI 0.98- 2.50, p=0.06) compared to those with normal renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal impairment is common in patients with AF undergoing PCI and even mild renal impairment has an adverse prognostic effect in these patients requiring multiple antithrombotic medications.

Antithrombotic Regimens for Patients Taking Oral Anticoagulation After Coronary Intervention: A Meta-analysis of 16 Clinical Trials and 9,185 Patients

The optimal antithrombotic regimen remains controversial in patients taking oral anticoagulation (OAC) undergoing coronary stenting. This study sought to compare efficacy and safety outcomes of triple therapy (OAC, aspirin, and clopidogrel) vs dual therapy (clopidogrel with aspirin or OAC) in these patients. We hypothesize OAC plus clopidogrel could be the optimal regimen for patients with indications for OAC receiving stent implantation. Medline, the Cochrane Library, and other Internet sources were searched for clinical trials comparing the efficacy and safety of triple vs dual therapy for patients taking OAC after coronary stenting. Sixteen eligible trials including 9185 patients were identified. The risks of major adverse cardiac events (odds ratio [OR]: 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82‐1.39, P = 0.65), all‐cause mortality (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.76‐1.27, P = 0.89), myocardial infarction (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.77‐1.31, P = 0.97), and stent thrombosis (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.49‐1.69, P = 0.75) were similar between triple and dual therapy. Compared with dual therapy, triple therapy was associated with a reduced risk of ischemic stroke (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.35‐0.94, P = 0.03) but with higher major bleeding (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.11‐2.10, P = 0.01) and minor bleeding (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.05‐2.42, P = 0.03). Subgroup analysis indicated there were similar ischemic stroke and major bleeding outcomes between triple therapy and therapy with OAC plus clopidogrel. Treatment with OAC and clopidogrel was associated with similar efficacy and safety outcomes compared with triple therapy. Triple therapy could be replaced by OAC plus clopidogrel without any concern about additional risk of thrombotic events.

Updates and current recommendations for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: what it means for clinical practice

The American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) have recently updated their joint guidelines for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS, including unstable angina [UA] and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI]). These guidelines replace the 2007 guidelines and the focused updates from 2011 and 2012 and now combine UA and NSTEMI into a new classification, NSTE-ACS, and updating the terminology around noninvasive management to ischemia-guided strategy. The latest guidelines include updated recommendations for the use of the oral antiplatelet agents (P2Y12 inhibitors) prasugrel and ticagrelor as part of dual-antiplatelet therapy-the cornerstone of treatment for these patients. This report provides a comprehensive overview of the new and modified recommendations for the management of patients with NSTE-ACS and the evidence supporting them. Also, where appropriate, similarities and differences between the current recommendations of the AHA/ACC and those of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) are highlighted. For example, the AHA/ACC recommends the P2Y12 inhibitor ticagrelor over clopidogrel in all patients with NSTE-ACS and clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor for patients in whom percutaneous coronary intervention is planned, whereas the ESC guidelines specifically recommend individual P2Y12 inhibitors for particular patient subgroups.

Antithrombotic therapy for long-term secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome in high-risk patients

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) represent a major clinical burden, because they tend to experience recurrent ischemic events. Acute management of patients with ACS includes combination antithrombotic therapy composed of a parenteral anticoagulant and dual-antiplatelet therapy. Dual-antiplatelet therapy is also recommended for long-term secondary prevention of ACS. Despite advances in the antithrombotic therapies available, clinical trials suggest that patients with ACS still faceã10% risk of another event within 12-15 months of the index event. Certain patient populations, such as elderly patients and those with renal impairment or heart failure, are at higher risk of recurrent ACS events, because these patients have more vascular ischemic and bleeding risk factors than most other patients. Evidence from the GRACE and CRUSADE registries suggests underuse of the guideline-recommended evidence-based therapies for the management of ACS in such patients. This review summarizes the current standard of care for patients with ACS, focusing on long-term secondary antithrombotic strategies. Registry data are used to identify high-risk patient populations; the recent antiplatelet and anticoagulant Phase III trial data are summarized to highlight any patient populations who receive greater or lesser benefit from specific long-term antithrombotic strategies. Guideline recommendations are discussed and suggestions are provided to help improve implementation of long-term secondary prevention strategies and patient prognosis after an ACS event.

Warfarin use and long-term outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation

Warfarin use in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and atrial fibrillation (AF) remains challenging. We describe use of warfarin up to 1 year after hospitalization among patients with AMI and AF according to stroke and bleeding risk, and identify factors associated with long-term mortality in this population. Patients with AMI and AF who underwent cardiac catheterization during their AMI hospitalization in 1995-2007 were identified from the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease. Warfarin use at discharge, 6 months, and 1 year as well as long-term vital status were assessed by surveys. Rates of warfarin use were presented according to CHADS2 and CHA2DS2VASc stroke and ATRIA bleeding risk scores. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to determine whether warfarin use at discharge was independently associated with 1-year mortality. A total of 879 patients hospitalized with AMI with AF were identified. Median age was 72 (25th, 75th percentiles: 64, 79), and median follow-up was 4.1 years (1.3, 7.4). The rate of warfarin use at discharge was 24 % and did not differ by CHADS2, CHA2DS2VASc, or ATRIA risk scores. Warfarin use remained similar at 6 months (26 %) and 1 year (27 %). Long-term mortality was high and did not differ by whether warfarin was or was not prescribed at discharge (72 and 71 %, respectively). Factors associated with 1-year mortality were history of heart failure (HR 1.58, 95 % CI 1.32-1.90), higher Charlson comorbidity index (HR 1.19, 95 % CI 1.11-1.28), and older age (HR 1.03 per 1-year increase, 95 % CI 1.02-1.05). Warfarin use at discharge among patients hospitalized for AMI who had comorbid AF was low and remained low at 1 year. Warfarin use at hospital discharge was not associated with either 1-year mortality or long-term mortality.

Antithrombotic therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome in the intermountain heart collaborative study

Objective. To determine factors associated with single antiplatelet (SAP) or dual antiplatelet (DAP) therapy and anticoagulants (AC) use in hospital and after discharge among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods. We evaluated 5,294 ACS patients in the Intermountain Heart Collaborative Study from 2004 to 2009. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to determine predictors of AC or AP use. Results. In hospital, 99% received an AC, 79% DAP, and 19% SAP; 78% had DAP + AC. Coronary stents were the strongest predictors of DAP use in hospital compared to SAP (P < 0.001). After discharge, 77% received DAP, 20% SAP, and 9% AC; 5% had DAP + AC. DAP compared to SAP was less likely for patients on AC (odds ratio [OR] = 0.30, P < 0.0001) after discharge. Placement of a stent increased the likelihood of DAP (bare metal: OR = 54.8, P < 0.0001; drug eluting: OR = 59.4, P < 0.0001). 923 had atrial fibrillation and 337 had a history of venous thromboembolism; these patients had increased use of AC (29% and 40%, resp.). Conclusion. While in-hospital use of AC was nearly universal, postdischarge AC use was rare. Concern for providing the best antithrombotic therapy, while maintaining an acceptable bleeding risk, may explain the selection decisions.