Catheter-based renal denervation for treatment of patients with treatment-resistant hypertension: 36 month results from the SYMPLICITY HTN-2 randomized clinical trial

A meta-analysis and review on the effectiveness and safety of renal denervation in managing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of renal denervation (RDN) in managing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

METHODS

A comprehensive search was done in multiple databases: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, and VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals. All clinical trials investigating RDN treatment for HFrEF through 15 March 2024 were gathered. The quality of the included studies was evaluated utilizing the Cochrane risk assessment tool. The pertinent data were gathered, and a meta-analysis was done using Review Manager 5.3, accompanied by sensitivity and publication bias analyses.

RESULTS

After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected for analysis, encompassing 314 patients; 154 patients underwent RDN treatment during hospitalization, while 150 were randomized to the control group to receive medication therapy. The meta-analysis demonstrated that compared to medication therapy, RDN contributed to a 9.59% increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (95% CI: 7.92-11.27, Z = 11.20, p < 0.01); a decrease in brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) (95% CI: -364.19--191.75, Z = 6.32, p < 0.01); a decrease in N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (95% CI: -1300.15--280.95, Z = 3.04, p < 0.01); a decrease in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification (95% CI: -1.58--0.34, Z = 3.05, p < 0.01); a 90.00-m increase in 6-min walk test (6MWT) (95% CI: 68.24-111.76, Z = 8.11, p < 0.01); a reduction of 4.05 mm in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) (95% CI: -5.65--2.48, Z = 5.05, p < 0.01); a decrease of 4.60 heart beats·min-1 (95% CI: -8.83--0.38, Z = 2.14, p < 0.05); and a 4.67-mm reduction in left atrial diameter (LAD) (95% CI: -6.40--2.93, Z = 5.27, p < 0.01). Left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) and systolic/diastolic blood pressure (OSBP/ODBP) were similar between groups (p > 0.01). As the safety indicator, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) improved by 7.11 in the RDN group [ml/(min·1.73 m2)] (95% CI: 1.10-13.12, Z = 2.32, p < 0.05). LVEF, BNP, 6MWT, LVEDD, LAD and eGFR were meta-analyzed using a fixed-effects model, the other indicators a random-effects model.

CONCLUSION

RDN significantly ameliorated cardiac function in HFrEF patients while exhibiting commendable safety.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Second-Generation Sham-Controlled Randomized Trials of Renal Denervation Therapy for Patients with Hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Renal denervation has been associated with substantial and sustained blood pressure reduction and is considered to serve as an alternative treatment for patients with resistant hypertension. However, the first published SHAM-controlled trial assessing RDN safety and efficacy showed no difference between groups.

AIM

We aimed to perform a meta-analysis quantifying the magnitude of blood pressure decrease secondary to renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension.

METHODS

Databases were searched for RCTs that compared RDN therapy to SHAM procedure and reported the outcomes of (1) 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure; (2) Office systolic blood pressure; (3) Daytime systolic blood pressure; and (4) Night-time systolic blood pressure. Mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was examined with I² statistics. P values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using RStudio 4.2.3.

RESULTS

Nine studies and 1622 patients were included. The AMBP [MD -3.72 95%CI -5.44, -2.00 p < 0.001; I²=34%] and DSBP [MD -4.10 95%CI -5.84, -2.37 p < 0.001; I²=0%] were significantly reduced in the RDN arm. ODBP [MD -6.04 95%CI -11.31, -0.78 p = 0.024; I²=90%] and NSBP [MD -1.81 95%CI -3.90, 0.27 p = 0.08; I²=0%] did not reach a statistically significant difference between groups.

CONCLUSION

Renal denervation demonstrates greater efficacy in reducing 24-hour ambulatory and daytime systolic blood pressure in patients diagnosed with resistant hypertension.

Research status and frontiers of renal denervation for hypertension: a bibliometric analysis from 2004 to 2023

BACKGROUND

Renal Denervation (RDN) is a novel non-pharmacological technique to treat hypertension. This technique lowers blood pressure by blocking the sympathetic nerve fibers around the renal artery, then causing a decrease in system sympathetic nerve excitability. This study aimed to visualize and analyze research hotspots and development trends in the field of RDN for hypertension through bibliometric analysis.

METHODS

In total, 1479 studies were retrieved on the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database from 2004 to 2023. Using CiteSpace (6.2.R4) and VOSviewer (1.6.18), visualization maps were generated by relevant literature in the field of RDN for hypertension to demonstrate the research status and frontiers.

RESULTS

The number of publications was found to be generally increasing. Europe and the United States were the first countries to carry out research on different techniques and related RDN clinical trials. The efficacy and safety of RDN have been repeatedly verified and gained increasing attention. The study involves multiple disciplines, including the cardiovascular system, peripheral vascular disease, and physiological pathology, among others. Research hotspots focus on elucidating the mechanism of RDN in the treatment of hypertension and the advantages of RDN in appliance therapy. Additionally, the research frontiers include improvement of RDN instruments and techniques, as well as exploration of the therapeutic effects of RDN in diseases with increased sympathetic nerve activity.

CONCLUSION

The research hotspots and frontiers reflect the status and development trend of RDN in hypertension. In the future, it is necessary to strengthen international collaboration and cooperation, conduct long-term clinical studies with a large sample size, and continuously improve RDN technology and devices. These measures will provide new options for more patients with hypertension, thereby improving their quality of life.

Options for patients with out-of-control blood pressure: after all avenues have been exhausted

INTRODUCTION

Uncontrolled hypertension is the leading risk factor for global mortality. Most hypertensive patients can be controlled with standard medication combinations, but some may not respond adequately to ≥3 or even to ≥5 antihypertensive agents.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we summarize the recent literature on difficult-to-treat hypertension identified by a Medline search, and we discuss the options for fourth line and subsequent therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

It is essential to confirm resistant hypertension with out-of-office blood pressure measurements and to consider lifestyle factors, adherence to medication and secondary causes of hypertension. When true resistant hypertension is confirmed and blood pressure is not controlled with an optimal triple combination, preferably as a fixed dose combination tablet, spironolactone is usually recommended as the fourth medication. Comorbid conditions should be treated as appropriate with sodium-glucose-cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, sacubitril-valsartan or finerenone. Renal denervation appears to be a useful addition to overcome some of the problems of medication adherence. The endothelin antagonist aprocitentan may be a final option in some countries. Of the drugs in development, the RNA based therapeutics that inhibit angiotensinogen synthesis appear to be some of the most promising.

Opportunities and Limitations of Renal Denervation: Where Do We Stand?

Hypertension is a primary contributor to cardiovascular disease, and the leading risk factor for loss of quality adjusted life years. Up to 50% of the cases of hypertension in the United States remain uncontrolled. Additionally, 8%-18% of the hypertensive population have resistant hypertension; uncontrolled pressure despite 3 different antihypertensive agents. Recently, catheter-based percutaneous renal denervation emerged as a method for ablating renal sympathetic nerves for difficult-to-control hypertension. Initial randomized (non-sham) trials and registry analyses showed impressive benefit, but the first sham-controlled randomized controlled trial using monopolar radiofrequency ablation showed limited benefit. With refinement of techniques to include multipolar radiofrequency, ultrasound denervation, and direct ethanol injection, randomized controlled trials demonstrated significant blood pressure improvement, leading to US Food and Drug Administration approval of radiofrequency- and ultrasound-based denervation technologies. In this review article, we summarize the major randomized sham-controlled trials and societal guidelines regarding the efficacy and safety of renal artery denervation for the treatment of uncontrolled hypertension.

Advances in preclinical surgical therapy of cardiovascular diseases

Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death worldwide, resulting in millions of deaths annually. Currently, there are still some deficiencies in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Innovative surgical treatments are currently being developed and tested in response to this situation. Large animal models, which are similar to humans in terms of anatomy, physiology, and genetics, play a crucial role in connecting basic research and clinical applications. This article reviews recent preclinical studies and the latest clinical advancements in cardiovascular disease based on large animal models, with a focus on targeted delivery, neural regulation, cardiac remodeling, and hemodynamic regulation. It provides new perspectives and ideas for clinical translation and offers new methods for clinical treatment.

Sympathetic Pathophysiology in Hypertension Origins: The Path to Renal Denervation

The importance of the sympathetic nervous system in essential hypertension has been recognized in 2 eras. The first was in early decades of the 20th century, through to the 1960s. Here, the sympathetic nervous system was identified as a target for the treatment of hypertension, and an extensive range of antiadrenergic therapies were developed. Then, after a period of lapsed interest, in a second era from 1985 on, the development of precise measures of human sympathetic nerve firing and transmitter release allowed demonstration of the importance of neural mechanisms in the initiation and maintenance of the arterial blood pressure elevation in hypertension. This led to the development of a device treatment of hypertension, catheter-based renal denervation, which we will discuss.

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Transcatheter Microwave and Radiofrequency Denervation in a Chronic Ovine Model

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter renal denervation (RDN) has had inconsistent efficacy and concerns for durability of denervation. We aimed to investigate long-term safety and efficacy of transcatheter microwave RDN in vivo in normotensive sheep in comparison to conventional radiofrequency ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sheep underwent bilateral RDN, receiving 1 to 2 microwave ablations (maximum power of 80-120 W for 240 s-480 s) and 12 to 16 radiofrequency ablations (180 s-240 s) in the main renal artery in a paired fashion, alternating the side of treatment, euthanized at 2 weeks (acute N=15) or 5.5 months (chronic N=15), and compared with undenervated controls (N=4). Microwave RDN produced substantial circumferential perivascular injury compared with radiofrequency at both 2 weeks [area 239.8 (interquartile range [IQR] 152.0-343.4) mm2 versus 50.1 (IQR, 32.0-74.6) mm2, P <0.001; depth 16.4 (IQR, 13.9-18.9) mm versus 7.5 (IQR, 6.0-8.9) mm P <0.001] and 5.5 months [area 20.0 (IQR, 3.4-31.8) mm2 versus 5.0 (IQR, 1.4-7.3) mm2, P=0.025; depth 5.9 (IQR, 1.9-8.8) mm versus 3.1 (IQR, 1.2-4.1) mm, P=0.005] using mixed models. Renal denervation resulted in significant long-term reductions in viability of renal sympathetic nerves [58.9% reduction with microwave (P=0.01) and 45% reduction with radiofrequency (P=0.017)] and median cortical norepinephrine levels [71% reduction with microwave (P <0.001) and 72.9% reduction with radiofrequency (P <0.001)] at 5.5 months compared with undenervated controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Transcatheter microwave RDN produces deep circumferential perivascular ablations without significant arterial injury to provide effective and durable RDN at 5.5 months compared with radiofrequency RDN.

Novel laparoscopic renal denervation immediately reduces atrial fibrillation inducibility: a swine model study

Catheter-based approaches may have inherent limitations in achieving effective renal denervation (RDN) and treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to investigate the acute effects of novel laparoscopic RDN on modulating AF inducibility using a swine model. Four and five swine were randomly allocated to the sham and RDN groups, respectively. Each swine underwent measurement of the atrial effective refractory period (AERP) and AF induction tests using burst atrial pacing before and immediately after sham or RDN procedures with and without vagal nerve stimulation (VNS). A laparoscopic RDN procedure circumferentially ablated the renal nerves round the renal arteries using radiofrequency energy. There was no significant difference in the baseline AERP between the two groups (p > 0.05). Under VNS, AERP was significantly increased by 20 ms after laparoscopic RDN (95% CI = 0-30, p = 0.004). Compared to the sham group, the RDN group showed significantly reduced AF inducibility [OR (95% CI) = 0.32 (0.13-0.76) and 0.24 (0.11-0.57) with and without VNS, respectively]. After laparoscopic RDN, the duration of inducible AF episodes was significantly shortened from 28 (10-77) s to 7 (3-11) s (p < 0.001). The novel laparoscopic RDN can immediately reduce AF inducibility in a swine model.

Resistant hypertension: consensus document from the Korean society of hypertension

Although reports vary, the prevalence of true resistant hypertension and apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) has been reported to be 10.3% and 14.7%, respectively. As there is a rapid increase in the prevalence of obesity, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes mellitus, factors that are associated with resistant hypertension, the prevalence of resistant hypertension is expected to rise as well. Frequently, patients with aTRH have pseudoresistant hypertension [aTRH due to white-coat uncontrolled hypertension (WUCH), drug underdosing, poor adherence, and inaccurate office blood pressure (BP) measurements]. As the prevalence of WUCH is high among patients with aTRH, the use of out-of-office BP measurements, both ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM), is essential to exclude WUCH. Non-adherence is especially problematic, and methods to assess adherence remain limited and often not clinically feasible. Therefore, the use of HBPM and higher utilization of single-pill fixed-dose combination treatments should be emphasized to improve drug adherence. In addition, primary aldosteronism and symptomatic obstructive sleep apnea are quite common in patients with hypertension and more so in patients with resistant hypertension. Screening for these diseases is essential, as the treatment of these secondary causes may help control BP in patients who are otherwise difficult to treat. Finally, a proper drug regimen combined with lifestyle modifications is essential to control BP in these patients.

Long-Term Safety and Antihypertensive Effects of Renal Denervation: Current Insights

Hypertension is the most potent modifiable risk factor for the development of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide. Nevertheless, blood pressure (BP) control on a broad scale appears to be insurmountable and has even worsened in the US. Barriers to sustained hypertension control are multifactorial and although lack of patient awareness and socioeconomic barriers to healthcare access may play a role, medication non-compliance and therapeutic inertia are major causes. Renal denervation (RDN) is a minimally invasive procedure that has been the subject of interest in clinical trials for more than a decade and although the first sham-controlled trial could not detect group difference between treated and untreated hypertensives, subsequent, better designed sham-controlled trials clearly demonstrated the BP lowering effect of RDN, as well as its safety. While to-date, RDN is not available for routine clinical practice, one major requirement for broad implementation is that the BP lowering effect is durable. Therefore, this review will summarize the available long-term data of the different RDN modalities with respect to both effectiveness and safety.

Controversies in Hypertension IV: Renal Denervation

Renal denervation is not a cure for hypertension. Although more recent sham-controlled trials were positive, a significant minority of patients in each trial were unresponsive. The optimal patient or patients need to be defined. Combined systolic/diastolic hypertension appears more responsive than isolated systolic hypertension. It remains uncertain whether patients with comorbidities associated with higher adrenergic tone should be targeted, including obesity, diabetes, sleep apnea, and chronic kidney disease. No biomarker can adequately predict response. A key to a successful response is the adequacy of denervation, which currently cannot be assessed in real time. It is uncertain what is the optimal denervation methodology: radiofrequency, ultrasound, or ethanol injection. Radiofrequency requires targeting the distal main renal artery plus major branches and accessory arteries. Although denervation appears to be safe, conclusive data on quality of life, improved target organ damage, and reduced cardiovascular events/mortality are required before denervation can be generally recommended.

Arterial Hypertension-clinical trials update 2023

Arterial hypertension is associated with increased morbidity and mortality and research in the field is highly dynamic. This summary reviews the most important clinical trials published in 2022 and early 2023. Findings on new pharmacological approaches to treat resistant hypertension are presented and new knowledge about the optimal timing of the antihypertensive medication intake is discussed. It is focused on optimal blood pressure treatment targets and the problem of treatment and guideline inertia is acknowledged. Information about pregnancy-related hypertension is presented and blood pressure control following percutaneous thrombectomy after ischemic stroke is discussed. Finally, novel clinical data on device-based approaches to treat hypertension are summarized. The hypertension trials update summarizes the most important clincal trials on hypertension research in 2022 and early 2023. CTD - chlorthalidone, CV - cardiovascular, HCT - hydrochlorothiazide, SBP - systolic blood pressure, RDN - renal denervation *depicts systolic blood pressure only.

Elevated renal afferent nerve activity in a rat model of endothelin B receptor deficiency

Renal nerves have been an attractive target for interventions aimed at lowering blood pressure; however, the specific roles of renal afferent (sensory) versus efferent sympathetic nerves in mediating hypertension are poorly characterized. A number of studies have suggested that a sympathoexcitatory signal conveyed by renal afferents elicits increases in blood pressure, whereas other studies identified sympathoinhibitory afferent pathways. These sympathoinhibitory pathways have been identified as protective against salt-sensitive increases in blood pressure through endothelin B (ETB) receptor activation. We hypothesized that ETB-deficient (ETB-def) rats, which are devoid of functional ETB receptors except in adrenergic tissues, lack appropriate sympathoinhibition and have lower renal afferent nerve activity following a high-salt diet compared with transgenic controls. We found that isolated renal pelvises from high salt-fed ETB-def animals lack a response to a physiological stimulus, prostaglandin E2, compared with transgenic controls but respond equally to a noxious stimulus, capsaicin. Surprisingly, we observed elevated renal afferent nerve activity in intact ETB-def rats compared with transgenic controls under both normal- and high-salt diets. ETB-def rats have been previously shown to have heightened global sympathetic tone, and we also observed higher total renal sympathetic nerve activity in ETB-def rats compared with transgenic controls under both normal- and high-salt diets. These data indicate that ETB receptors are integral mediators of the sympathoinhibitory renal afferent reflex (renorenal reflex), and, in a genetic rat model of ETB deficiency, the preponderance of sympathoexcitatory renal afferent nerve activity prevails and may contribute to hypertension.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Here, we found that endothelin B receptors are an important contributor to renal afferent nerve responsiveness to a high-salt diet. Rats lacking endothelin B receptors have increased afferent nerve activity that is not responsive to a high-salt diet.

Radio frequency-based renal denervation: a story of simplicity?

Radio frequency-based renal denervation is a safe and effective way of lowering blood pressure, a common condition associated with high cardiovascular risk. Several catheters have been developed to administer energy to the renal arteries and their side branches, thereby modulating sympathetic renal activity. The Symplicity Flex™ and Symplicity Spyral™ are first- and second-generation devices, respectively, for radio frequency-based renal denervation. There is a continuous need to further improve and adjust interventional antihypertensive therapies. Several randomized controlled trials have been conducted to investigate the safety and efficacy of these catheters and most were able to show radio frequency-based renal denervation to be feasible, safe and effective in lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients with and without concomitant antihypertensive medication. Herein, the authors discuss the pathophysiologic concepts of renal denervation and its procedural approaches, report catheter designs, summarize clinical trials outcomes and, finally, discuss real-world evidence.

A new use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: Role of bioelectric technology in resistant hypertension (Review)

Hypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease-associated death. Hypertension and its complications are the main problems that have an impact on public health at present. A portion of adults with hypertension fail to meet the recommended blood pressure (BP) treatment goals, despite strict clinical management. Those individuals requiring at least three types of antihypertensive drugs to achieve their BP goal may be classified as patients with resistant hypertension (RH). Bioelectric technology is an emerging method that functions with the help of the human body's own bioelectric system. It is widely used in auxiliary examination, pain relief and organ function rehabilitation. Bioelectrical technology, as an effective treatment for RH, has developed rapidly in recent years and mainly includes renal sympathetic denervation, carotid baroreflex activation therapy, Traditional Chinese Medicine electroacupuncture and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). The present review describes the pathogenesis of hypertension and provides an understanding of bioelectrical technology as a treatment. In particular, the development of the application of TENS in RH is introduced. The aim is to provide a basis for the clinical treatment of RH and a new idea for further clinical trials in this field.

Renal nerve stimulation identifies renal innervation and optimizes the strategy for renal denervation in canine

BACKGROUND

Renal denervation (RDN) was still performed without any intra-procedural method for nerve mapping. Whether renal nerve stimulation (RNS) is an efficient way to identify renal autonomic innervation and optimize the strategy for RDN remain to be worthy for further exploration.

METHODS

The characteristics of renal autonomic innervation at the sites with different blood pressure (BP) responses to RNS were explored. Then, dogs anatomically eligible for RDN were randomly assigned into elevated BP response ablation group, reduced BP response ablation group, and RNS-control group. The postoperative outcomes were measured at baseline and after 4 weeks follow-up.

RESULTS

The proportion of afferent sensory nerve was higher at elevated BP response sites (ERS) than reduced BP response sites (RRS) and non-response sites (NRS) (P = 0.012 and P = 0.004). Conversely, the proportion of parasympathetic nerve at RRS was the highest (RRS vs. ERS, P = 0.017; RRS vs. NRS, P = 0.023). More importantly, there was a significant correlation between systolic blood pressure changes and the area ratios of afferent sensory and parasympathetic nerve (R = 0.859; P < 0.001). In addition, ablation at BP-elevation sites can result in a significant decrease in BP and plasma norepinephrine (NE) after 4 weeks (P = 0.002; P = 0.008), while ablation at BP-reduction sites can lead to significant increases in BP and plasma NE (P = 0.016; P = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

RNS is an effective method to identify renal autonomic innervation. It could not only help to identify optimal target sites, but also avoid ablation of sympathetic-inhibitory areas during RDN.

Catheter-based renal denervation in Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease and uncontrolled hypertension

Sympathetic activation contributes to the progression of hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Ablation of renal sympathetic nerves lowers blood pressure (BP) and preserves renal function in patients with CKD and uncontrolled hypertension by reducing sympathetic nerve activity. But whether this approach is safe and effective in Chinese patients with CKD is unknown. We performed an observational study of eight patients with CKD stages from 1 to 5, office BP ≥150/90 mmHg, while on at least three antihypertensive drug classes including a diuretic, and diagnosis confirmed by 24 h ambulatory systolic BP measurement ≥135 mmHg. All patients underwent catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) using a newly designed RDN System (Golden Leaf Medtech, Shanghai, China). For up to 6 months after RDN, BP was monitored and renal function was assessed. Mean baseline office BP was 165.0 ± 13.9/97.8 ± 5.5 mmHg, despite treatment with three antihypertensive drugs. Six months after RDN, office BP was reduced by 22.1 ± 12.0 (P = .002)/11.0 ± 8.8 mmHg (P = .012) and average 24 h ambulatory BP by 18 ± 13.7 (P = .01)/9.3 ± 7.7 mmHg (P = .016). After RDN, heart rate and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) had no significant change compared with before RDN. In Chinese patients with CKD, our observational pilot study found that treating hypertension with RDN lowers BP while not affecting renal function. Brief Abstract: We performed RDN in eight Chinese patients with hypertension and CKD. The results showed that RDN lowered blood pressure of these patients significantly and eGFR was stable. No obvious adverse event was observed.

Renal Sympathetic Denervation for Hypertension

Arterial hypertension is the most prevalent global modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Despite the availability of numerous pharmacologic treatments, many patients do not achieve guideline-recommended blood pressure targets. Therefore, renal sympathetic denervation (RDN), a process in which catheter-directed techniques are used to ablate portions of the renal artery to reduce sympathetic activity, has been extensively investigated as a complementary and nonpharmacologic approach for the treatment of arterial hypertension. This review seeks to discuss the pathophysiological rationale of this strategy, to survey its history and development, and to highlight the current clinical evidence and possible future directions of its employment. In sum, RDN has demonstrated itself to be a safe and well-tolerated endovascular intervention that can reliably contribute to improved blood pressure control and, perhaps ultimately, significant cardiovascular prognosis.

Catheter-based renal sympathetic nerve denervation on hypertension management outcomes

BACKGROUND

Renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) provides a minimally invasive interventional treatment modality for patients with resistant hypertension. However, the post-operative outcomes remain a key area of investigation since its earliest clinical trials.

AIM

To evaluate patient outcomes after RSD intervention among peer-reviewed patient cases.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature on MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for RSD case studies to assess post-operative hypertension readings and medical management.

RESULTS

Among 51 RSD cases, the post-operative RSD patients report an apparent reduction with a mean number of 3.1 antihypertensive medications. The mean systolic arterial blood pressure 1 year following RSD was 136.0 mmHg (95%CI: 118.7-153.3).

CONCLUSION

The apparent improvements in office systolic blood pressure after 12 month post-operative RSD can support the therapeutic potential of this intervention for blood pressure reduction. Additional studies which utilized a uniform methodology for blood pressure measurement can further support the findings of this systematic review.

Long-term efficacy and safety of renal denervation in the presence of antihypertensive drugs (SPYRAL HTN-ON MED): a randomised, sham-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Renal denervation has been shown to lower blood pressure in the presence of antihypertensive medications; however, long-term safety and efficacy data from randomised trials of renal denervation are lacking. In this pre-specified analysis of the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED study, we compared changes in blood pressure, antihypertensive drug use, and safety up to 36 months in renal denervation versus a sham control group.

METHODS

This randomised, single-blind, sham-controlled trial enrolled patients from 25 clinical centres in the USA, Germany, Japan, the UK, Australia, Austria, and Greece, with uncontrolled hypertension and office systolic blood pressure between 150 mm Hg and 180 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher. Eligible patients had to have 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure between 140 mm Hg and less than 170 mm Hg, while taking one to three antihypertensive drugs with stable doses for at least 6 weeks. Patients underwent renal angiography and were randomly assigned (1:1) to radiofrequency renal denervation or a sham control procedure. Patients and physicians were unmasked after 12-month follow-up and sham control patients could cross over after 12-month follow-up completion. The primary endpoint was the treatment difference in mean 24-h systolic blood pressure at 6 months between the renal denervation group and the sham control group. Statistical analyses were done on the intention-to-treat population. Long-term efficacy was assessed using ambulatory and office blood pressure measurements up to 36 months. Drug surveillance was used to assess medication use. Safety events were assessed up to 36 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02439775; prospectively, an additional 260 patients are currently being randomly assigned as part of the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED Expansion trial.

FINDINGS

Between July 22, 2015, and June 14, 2017, among 467 enrolled patients, 80 patients fulfilled the qualifying criteria and were randomly assigned to undergo renal denervation (n=38) or a sham control procedure (n=42). Mean ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure were significantly reduced from baseline in the renal denervation group, and were significantly lower than the sham control group at 24 and 36 months, despite a similar treatment intensity of antihypertensive drugs. The medication burden at 36 months was 2·13 medications (SD 1·15) in the renal denervation group and 2·55 medications (2·19) in the sham control group (p=0·26). 24 (77%) of 31 patients in the renal denervation group and 25 (93%) of 27 patients in the sham control group adhered to medication at 36 months. At 36 months, the ambulatory systolic blood pressure reduction was -18·7 mm Hg (SD 12·4) for the renal denervation group (n=30) and -8·6 mm Hg (14·6) for the sham control group (n=32; adjusted treatment difference -10·0 mm Hg, 95% CI -16·6 to -3·3; p=0·0039). Treatment differences between the renal denervation group and sham control group at 36 months were -5·9 mm Hg (95% CI -10·1 to -1·8; p=0·0055) for mean ambulatory diastolic blood pressure, -11·0 mm Hg (-19·8 to -2·1; p=0·016) for morning systolic blood pressure, and -11·8 mm Hg (-19·0 to -4·7; p=0·0017) for night-time systolic blood pressure. There were no short-term or long-term safety issues associated with renal denervation.

INTERPRETATION

Radiofrequency renal denervation compared with sham control produced a clinically meaningful and lasting blood pressure reduction up to 36 months of follow-up, independent of concomitant antihypertensive medications and without major safety events. Renal denervation could provide an adjunctive treatment modality in the management of patients with hypertension.

FUNDING

Medtronic.

An Update on Refractory Hypertension

Purpose of Review

To update on definition, diagnosis, prevalence, patient characteristics, pathophysiology, and treatment of refractory hypertension (RfHTN).

Recent Findings

Refractory hypertension (RfHTN) is defined as blood pressure (BP) that is uncontrolled despite using ≥ 5 antihypertensive medications of different classes, including a long-acting thiazide diuretic and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) at maximal or maximally tolerated doses. This new phenotype is different from resistant hypertension (RHTN), defined as BP that is uncontrolled despite using ≥ 3 medications, commonly a long-acting calcium channel blocker (CCB), a blocker of the renin-angiotensin system (angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]), and a diuretic. The RHTN phenotype includes controlled RHTN, BP that is controlled on 4 or more medications. RfHTN is largely attributable to increased sympathetic activity, unlike RHTN, which is mainly due to increased intravascular fluid volume frequently caused by hyperaldosteronism and chronic excessive sodium ingestion. Compared to those with controlled RHTN, patients with RfHTN have a higher prevalence of target organ damage and do not have elevated aldosterone levels. Ongoing clinical trials are assessing the safety and efficacy of using devices to aid with BP control in patients with RfHTN.

Summary

RfHTN is a separate entity from RHTN and is generally attributable to increased sympathetic activity.

Acute and Short-Term Autonomic and Hemodynamic Responses to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension

Previously, we demonstrated that acute transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reduced blood pressure (BP) and improved autonomic modulation in hypertensives. We hypothesized that acute and short-term tDCS intervention can promote similar benefits in resistant hypertensive patients (RHT). We assessed the impact of one (acute intervention) and ten (short-term intervention) tDCS or SHAM (20 min, each) sessions on BP, pulse interval (PI) and systolic blood pressure variabilities, humoral mechanisms associated with BP regulation, and cytokines levels. True RHT subjects (n = 13) were randomly submitted to one and ten SHAM and tDCS crossing sessions (1 week of “washout”). Hemodynamic (Finometer^®, Beatscope), office BP, and autonomic variables (accessed through spectral analysis of the pulse-to-pulse BP signal, in the time and frequency domain – Fast Fourrier Transform) were measured at baseline and after the short-term intervention. 24 h-ambulatory BP monitoring was measured after acute and short-term protocols. Acute intervention: tDCS reduced BP, cardiac output, and increase high-frequency band of PI (vagal modulation to the heart). Short-term protocol: tDCS did not change BP and cardiac output parameters. In contrast, central systolic BP (−12%), augmentation index (−31%), and pulse wave velocity (34%) were decreased by the short-term tDCS when compared to SHAM. These positive results were accompanied by a reduction in the low-frequency band (−37%) and an increase of the high-frequency band of PI (+62%) compared to SHAM. These findings collectively indicate that short-term tDCS concomitantly improves resting cardiac autonomic control and pulse wave behavior and reduces central BP in RHT patients, https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-8n7c9p.

Validation of a Novel Renal Denervation System With Cryoablation: A Preclinical Study and Case Series

•

With the concept of cryoablation, we innovatively applied liquid nitrogen in RDN and designed a dedicated balloon catheter and system for Cryo-RDN.

•

In a swine model, this Cryo-RDN system demonstrated device-related safety and efficacy. The extent and depth of nerve ablation were efficient and stable. Sustained decreases in renal and serum norepinephrine also suggested effective ablation in the long term.

•

Cryo-RDN also met safety endpoints in 6 patients with resistant hypertension. The 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and office blood pressure of all 6 patients were reduced after 6 months compared with their baseline values, providing clinical support for further large-scale clinical studies.

Recently, we designed a renal denervation with cryoablation (Cryo-RDN) system using liquid nitrogen and proved its short-term safety and effectiveness. In this study, we first conducted a 6-month follow-up in a swine model. Renal sympathetic nerve activity remained at a significantly lower level than that of the control group after 6 months. In patients with resistant hypertension, Cryo-RDN demonstrated preliminary safety. Renal function fluctuations and vascular-related complications were not detected. In addition, the average 24-hour systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased by 12.17 ± 8.35 mm Hg and 8.50 ± 3.83 mm Hg at the 6-month follow-up, respectively, compared with their baseline values.

Renal denervation inhibits the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in spontaneously hypertensive rats

This study was conducted to explore the effect of renal denervation (RDN) on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). Our experimental rats were randomly divided into the RDN group conducted by painting 10% phenol on the bilateral renal nerves (RDNX), the shamoperation group simply painting with saline (Sham), and the normotension control group (WKY) following all the animal blood and tissues of kidney, hypothalamus, and adrenal gland collected and examined 2 weeks after RDN operation. We found that the aldosterone (ALD) levels in serum and tissues all decreased in the RDNX group compared with the Sham group (p < .05). Meantime, the expression of angiotensin II type1 receptor (AT1R) mRNA also exhibited significantly reduced by 2.22-fold in the RDNX group compared to the Sham group identical to the expression of AT1R protein in the renal cortex and outer stripe of the outer medulla (OSOM) subjected to denervation surgery, which manifested the lower ATIR protein expression than the Sham group (p < .05). Besides, the expression of angiotensin II (Ang II) protein in the cortex , OSOM, and inner stripe of the outer medulla were all attenuated by RDN in comparison with the Sham group (p < .05). RDN reduced intrarenal RAAS and circulating RAAS to lower blood pressure and repair renal function.

Endovascular denervation (EDN): From Hypertension to Non-Hypertension Diseases

Recently, the use of endovascular denervation (EDN) to treat resistant hypertension has gained significant attention. In addition to reducing sympathetic activity, EDN might also have beneficial effects on pulmonary arterial hypertension, insulin resistance, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, loin pain hematuria syndrome, cancer pain and so on. In this article we will summarize the progress of EDN in clinical research.

Renal denervation for resistant hypertension

BACKGROUND

Resistant hypertension is highly prevalent among the general hypertensive population and the clinical management of this condition remains problematic. Different approaches, including a more intensified antihypertensive therapy, lifestyle modifications or both, have largely failed to improve patients' outcomes and to reduce cardiovascular and renal risk. As renal sympathetic hyperactivity is a major driver of resistant hypertension, in the last decade renal sympathetic ablation (renal denervation) has been proposed as a possible therapeutic alternative to treat this condition.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the short- and long-term effects of renal denervation in individuals with resistant hypertension on clinical end points, including fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, hospital admissions, quality of life, blood pressure control, left ventricular hypertrophy, cardiovascular and metabolic profile and kidney function, as well as the potential adverse events related to the procedure.

SEARCH METHODS

For this updated review, the Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomised controlled trials up to 3 November 2020: Cochrane Hypertension's Specialised Register, CENTRAL (2020, Issue 11), Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid Embase. The World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (via CENTRAL) and the US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for ongoing trials. We also contacted authors of relevant papers regarding further published and unpublished work. The searches had no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared renal denervation to standard therapy or sham procedure to treat resistant hypertension, without language restriction.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed study risk of bias. We summarised treatment effects on available clinical outcomes and adverse events using random-effects meta-analyses. We assessed heterogeneity in estimated treatment effects using Chi² and I² statistics. We calculated summary treatment estimates as a mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous outcomes, and a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, together with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Certainty of evidence has been assessed using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 15 eligible studies (1416 participants). In four studies, renal denervation was compared to sham procedure; in the remaining studies, renal denervation was tested against standard or intensified antihypertensive therapy. Most studies had unclear or high risk of bias for allocation concealment and blinding.  When compared to control, there was low-certainty evidence that renal denervation had little or no effect on the risk of myocardial infarction (4 studies, 742 participants; RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.45 to 3.84), ischaemic stroke (5 studies, 892 participants; RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.95), unstable angina (3 studies, 270 participants; RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.89) or hospitalisation (3 studies, 743 participants; RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.50 to 3.11). Based on moderate-certainty evidence, renal denervation may reduce 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) systolic BP (9 studies, 1045 participants; MD -5.29 mmHg, 95% CI -10.46 to -0.13), ABPM diastolic BP (8 studies, 1004 participants; MD -3.75 mmHg, 95% CI -7.10 to -0.39) and office diastolic BP (8 studies, 1049 participants; MD -4.61 mmHg, 95% CI -8.23 to -0.99). Conversely, this procedure had little or no effect on office systolic BP (10 studies, 1090 participants; MD -5.92 mmHg, 95% CI -12.94 to 1.10). Moderate-certainty evidence suggested that renal denervation may not reduce serum creatinine (5 studies, 721 participants, MD 0.03 mg/dL, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.13) and may not increase the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or creatinine clearance (6 studies, 822 participants; MD -2.56 mL/min, 95% CI -7.53 to 2.42).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In patients with resistant hypertension, there is low-certainty evidence that renal denervation does not improve major cardiovascular outomes and renal function. Conversely, moderate-certainty evidence exists that it may improve 24h ABPM and diastolic office-measured BP. Future trials measuring patient-centred instead of surrogate outcomes, with longer follow-up periods, larger sample size and more standardised procedural methods are necessary to clarify the utility of this procedure in this population.

Renal denervation based on experimental rationale

Excessive activation of the sympathetic nervous system is one of the pathophysiological hallmarks of hypertension and heart failure. Within the central nervous system, the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus and the rostral ventrolateral medulla in the brain stem play critical roles in the regulation of sympathetic outflow to peripheral organs. Information from the peripheral circulation, including serum concentrations of sodium and angiotensin II, is conveyed to the PVN via adjacent structures with a weak blood-brain barrier. In addition, signals from baroreceptors, chemoreceptors and cardiopulmonary receptors as well as afferent input via the renal nerves are all integrated at the level of the PVN. The brain renin-angiotensin system and the balance between nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species in these brain areas also determine the final sympathetic outflow. Additionally, brain inflammatory responses have been shown to modulate these processes. Renal denervation interrupts both the afferent inputs from the kidney to the PVN and the efferent outputs from the PVN to the kidney, resulting in the suppression of sympathetic outflow and eliciting beneficial effects on both hypertension and heart failure.

Immediate Renal Denervation After Acute Myocardial Infarction Mitigates the Progression of Heart Failure via the Modulation of IL-33/ST2 Signaling

Objective: Previous studies have demonstrated the protective effects of renal denervation (RDN) in pre-existing heart failure, but the effects of immediate RDN after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) on subsequent cardiac remodeling have not been reported. This study aimed to investigate the cardioprotective effects of immediate RDN after AMI and its underlying mechanism.

Methods: AMI was induced by intracoronary gelatin sponge embolization in 14 Shanghai white pigs that were randomized to undergo either renal angiography (AMI+sham group) or RDN (AMI+RDN group) after 1 h of hemodynamic monitoring. Cardiac function of the two groups was measured at baseline, 1 h post-AMI and at the 1 month follow-up (1M-FU) by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Plasma NT-proBNP, soluble ST2 (sST2), norepinephrine (NE), and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activity were detected simultaneously. The renal cortex was harvested for NE measurement after the 1M-FU, and the renal arteries were stained with tyrosine hydroxylase for the evaluation of sympathetic activity. Heart tissues in the non-ischemic areas were collected to assess histological and molecular left ventricular (LV) remodeling by pathological staining, RT-PCR, and western blotting.

Results: There was no difference in the hemodynamic stability or cardiac function between the two groups at baseline and 1 h post-AMI. Six pigs from each of the two groups completed the 1M-FU. TTE analysis revealed the improved cardiac function of immediate RDN in the AMI+RDN group and circulating NT-proBNP levels were lower than those in the AMI+sham group. Further analysis showed significantly less interstitial fibrosis in the remote non-ischemic myocardium after immediate RDN, together with decreased cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and inflammatory cell infiltration. sST2 levels in circulating and myocardial tissues of animals in the AMI+RDN group were significantly higher than those in the AMI+sham group, accompanied by corresponding alterations in IL-33/ST2 and downstream signaling.

Conclusions: Immediate RDN can improve cardiac function and myocardial remodeling after AMI via modulation of IL-33/ST2 and downstream signaling.

Renal nerve stimulation: complete versus incomplete renal sympathetic denervation

PURPOSE

Blood pressure (BP) reduction after renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) is highly variable. Renal nerve stimulation (RNS) can localize sympathetic nerves. The RNS trial aimed to investigate the medium-term BP-lowering effects of the use of RNS during RDN, and explore if RNS can check the completeness of the denervation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-four treatment-resistant hypertensive patients were included in the prospective, single-center RNS trial. The primary study endpoint was change in 24-h BP at 6- to 12-month follow-up after RDN. The secondary study endpoints were the acute procedural RNS-induced BP response before and after RDN; number of antihypertensive drugs at follow-up; and the correlation between the RNS-induced BP increase before versus after RDN (delta [Δ] RNS-induced BP).

RESULTS

Before RDN, the RNS-induced systolic BP rise was 43(±21) mmHg, and decreased to 9(±12) mmHg after RDN (p < 0.001). Mean 24-h systolic/diastolic BP decreased from 147(±12)/82(±11) mmHg at baseline to 135(±11)/76(±10) mmHg (p < 0.001/<0.001) at follow-up (10 [6-12] months), with 1 antihypertensive drug less compared to baseline. The Δ RNS-induced BP and the 24-h BP decrease at follow-up were correlated for systolic (R = 0.44, p = 0.004) and diastolic (R = 0.48, p = 0.003) BP. Patients with ≤0 mmHg residual RNS-induced BP response after RDN had a significant lower mean 24-h systolic BP at follow-up compared to the patients with >0 mmHg residual RNS-induced BP response (126 ± 4 mmHg versus 135 ± 10 mmHg, p = 0.04). 83% of the patients with ≤0 mmHg residual RNS-induced BP response had normal 24-h BP at follow-up, compared to 33% in the patients with >0 mmHg residual RNS-induced BP response (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

The use of RNS during RDN leads to clinically significant and sustained lowering of 24-h BP with fewer antihypertensive drugs at follow-up. RNS-induced BP changes were correlated with 24-h BP changes at follow-up. Moreover, patients with complete denervation had significant lower BP compared to the patients with incomplete denervation.

Evaluating the thermal performance of a balloon-based renal sympathetic denervation system with array electrodes: a finite element study

Renal denervation transmits radiofrequency (RF) energy through an electrode to treat resistant hypertension (RH), applying ablation in the renal artery. Several experimental studies have shown that this treatment has been used effectively to treat RH. The aim of this paper is to investigate the effect of ablation parameters (i.e., electrode length, applied voltage, ablation time, and blood flow) on the temperature distribution using a balloon-based array electrodes system. A simplified three-dimensional model including four electrodes and a balloon was established. The balloon diameter was 3 mm and placed in a 5 mm diameter renal artery for forming intra-arterial occlusion. Four electrodes were mounted on the balloon and distributed in the same plane to mimic circumferential RF ablation. Computer simulations were conducted to investigate the thermal performances of the device by setting different electrode configurations, treatment protocols, and physiological factors. The thermal performances including the thermal distribution, maximum lesion depth, length, and area were analyzed. The lesion shape of the array RF electrodes was approximately a sphere with a 100% circumference coverage rate of the renal artery. The lesion depth and length increase with each factor except for blood velocity. Increasing the electrode length from 2 to 4 mm or 2 to 6 mm, the lesion depth increases by 1.15 mm and 0.54 mm at 60 s. The corresponding lesion length increases by 2.65 mm and 2.34 mm, respectively. The range of effective lesion depth is 1.90-4.90 mm, at a voltage of 15-30 V. But the peak temperature at the arterial outer wall exceeded 100 °C when the voltage is above 25 V. In tissue, the degree of thermal injury in the 2 mm area reached 100%, but in blood was not more than 5%. There was no significant difference at different flow conditions because the difference value in lesion depth was not exceeded 0.5 mm. The results showed that the balloon-based four electrodes system is expected to overcome the difficulty of incomplete ablation. In clinical application, 2 mm-electrode is recommended to avoid long wall damage as much as possible and control the voltage below 25 V. This treatment has little thermal injury on the blood, which means it may avoid coagulation formation. Moreover, the application of this device does not need to consider the difference in individual blood velocity.

Renal denervation does not affect hypertension or the renin-angiotensin system in a rodent model of juvenile-onset polycystic kidney disease: clinical implications

We examined the effect of total and afferent renal denervation (RDN) on hypertension and the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in a rodent model of juvenile-onset polycystic kidney disease (PKD). Lewis Polycystic Kidney (LPK) and control rats received total, afferent or sham RDN by periaxonal application of phenol, capsaicin or normal saline, respectively, and were monitored for 4-weeks. Afferent RDN did not affect systolic blood pressure (SBP) determined by radiotelemetry in either strain (n = 19) while total RDN significantly reduced SBP in Lewis rats 4-weeks post-denervation (total vs. sham, 122 ± 1 vs. 130 ± 2 mmHg, P = 0.002, n = 25). Plasma and kidney renin content determined by radioimmunoassay were significantly lower in LPK vs. Lewis (plasma: 278.2 ± 6.7 vs. 376.5 ± 11.9 ng Ang I/ml/h; kidney: 260.1 ± 6.3 vs. 753.2 ± 37.9 ng Ang I/mg/h, P < 0.001, n = 26). These parameters were not affected by RDN. Intrarenal mRNA expression levels of renin, angiotensinogen, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)2, and angiotensin II receptor type 1a were significantly lower, whereas ACE1 expression was significantly higher in the LPK vs. Lewis (all P < 0.05, n = 26). This pattern of intrarenal RAS expression was not changed by RDN. In conclusion, RDN does not affect hypertension or the RAS in the LPK model and indicates RDN might not be a suitable antihypertensive strategy for individuals with juvenile-onset PKD.

Renal denervation therapy for hypertension: truths and half-truths: Renal denervation therapy for hypertension

Systemic hypertension is a major contributing factor for excessive morbidity and mortality globally. Experimental studies and early clinical trials showed excellent therapeutic responses to renal denervation (RDN) in patients with hypertension. However meta-analyses and objective assessments have failed to show that RDN therapy has any significant effect on blood pressure.  The aim of this review is to introduce the different methods that can be used in RDN, along with the benefits and disadvantages of these methods. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation (of renal nerves) is the most com-mon method of RDN, and we discuss the clinical evaluation of this method in the SYMPLICITY RDN trials. Finally, the development of second-generation RF devices and more comprehensive RDN procedures lead us to consider the current status and future path for RDN.

New Drugs and Interventional Strategies for the Management of Hypertension

Essential hypertension is an important cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide with significant clinical and economic implications. The field of antihypertensive treatment already numbers numerous agents and classes of drugs. However, patients are still developing uncontrolled hypertension. Hence there is a continuous need for novel agents with good tolerability. Advances in this field are focusing both on pharmacotherapy, with the developments in traditional and non-traditional targets, as well as interventional techniques such as renal denervation and baroreflex activation therapy. It is likely that future strategies may involve a tailored approach to the individual patient, with genetic modulation playing a key role.

Long-term outcomes after renal denervation in an Asian population: results from the Global SYMPLICITY Registry in South Korea (GSR Korea)

The objective of this work was to investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of renal denervation in Korean patients from the Global SYMPLICITY Registry (GSR). GSR Korea is a substudy of GSR with additional inclusion and exclusion criteria compared to GSR, including inclusion criteria of office systolic blood pressure ≥160 mmHg, or ≥150 mmHg for type 2 diabetes patients, while receiving 3 or more antihypertensive medications without changes for 2 weeks prior to enrollment. Renal denervation was performed using a Symplicity Flex catheter for ablation in the main renal arteries. Changes in office systolic blood pressure and adverse events were collected for up to 36 months of follow-up for 102 patients in GSR Korea. In addition, adverse events and reductions in office systolic blood pressure were analyzed for patients with and without type II diabetes mellitus. Renal denervation led to mean (± standard deviation) reductions in office systolic blood pressure at 12, 24, and 36 months in GSR Korea (-26.7 ± 18.5, -30.1 ± 21.6 mmHg, and -32.5 ± 18.8, respectively). The proportion of patients with a ≥10 mmHg office systolic blood pressure reduction from baseline was 86.3% at 12 months, 86.5% at 24 months, and 89.7% at 36 months. Adverse events at 3 years were rare. In addition, reductions in office systolic blood pressure were similar for patients with vs. without diabetes mellitus (p > 0.05 at all timepoints). Office systolic blood pressure was safely reduced at up to 36 months post-renal denervation in GSR Korea, and adverse events were rare. In addition, patients with and without diabetes had similar office systolic blood pressure reductions.

Effect of renal denervation on long-term outcomes in patients with resistant hypertension

Increasing studies strongly prove that renal denervation, a minimally invasive surgery, is a promising new non-drug treatment method that can effectively control blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension, but the evaluation of the long-term blood pressure control effect of renal denervation for resistant hypertension is still lacking. Here, we critically review current long-term follow-up data about the use of renal denervation for RH to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of renal denervation for RH, and to provide practical guidance for practitioners who are establishing a renal denervation service. Limited by the current research, many problems need to be solved before renal denervation is applied to RH. In addition, ambulatory blood pressure should be the first choice for the evaluation of blood pressure. Finally, the continuous antihypertensive effect of renal denervation in different renal denervation systems also needs to be strictly compared.

The Effects of Renal Nerve Denervation on Blood Pressure and Target Organs in Different Hypertensive Rat Models

Background

Hypertension contributes to the progression of cardiac remodeling and renal damage. In turn, renal sympathetic hyperactivation showed elevated sympathetic nervous system activity and led to blood pressure increase in certain patients. The purpose of this study was to observe the effect of renal nerve denervation on blood pressure and target organ changes in two hypertensive rat models.

Methods

Hypertensive rats were randomly divided into a renal denervation (RDN) group and sham operation group. Wistar–Kyoto (WKY) rats of the same age were set as the baseline control group. In the secondary hypertension model, SD rats were randomly divided into five groups. Blood pressure and bodyweight were measured every week until they were euthanized.

Results

The two rat models underwent RDN at key timepoints. At these timepoints, the hearts and kidneys were collected for norepinephrine and angiotensin II measurements and histological analysis.

Conclusion

RDN performed before development of hypertension showed a significant antihypertensive effect on the secondary hypertension model.

Hypertension: Current trends and future perspectives

Hypertension is a significant and increasing global health issue. It is a leading cause of cardiovascular disease and premature death worldwide due to its effects on end organs, and through its associations with chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus and obesity. Despite current management strategies, many patients do not achieve adequate blood pressure (BP) control. Hypertension-related cardiovascular mortality rates are rising in tandem with the increasing global prevalence of chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus and obesity. Improving BP control must therefore be urgently prioritised. Strategies include utilising existing antihypertensive agents more effectively, and using treatments developed for co-existing conditions (such as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for diabetes mellitus) that offer additional BP-lowering and cardiovascular benefits. Additionally, novel therapeutic agents that target alternative prohypertensive pathways and that offer broader cardiovascular protection are under development, including dual angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors. Nonpharmacological strategies such as immunotherapy are also being explored. Finally, advancing knowledge of the human genome and molecular modification technology may usher in an exciting new era of personalised medicine, with the potential to revolutionise the management of hypertension.

Renal Denervation: A Revival or The Same Old Story

Despite well-established pharmacological treatment, hypertension has remained a large contributor to noncommunicable deaths. Given the well-known association of hypertension with adverse cardiovascular disease the importance of blood pressure control has never been more crucial. Traditionally, pharmacological management has been the mainstay of care, however, with a growing burden of disease alternative and innovative approaches are now being considered. Minimally invasive catheter-based ablation systems, targeting renal sympathetic nerves, has been proposed as a more permanent way to control blood pressure. However, the clinical data supporting renal denervation has had many rises and falls throughout the years. With the promising results of the recent second-generation clinical trials there has been a renewed area of interest for renal denervation in the treatment of hypertension.

Thirty-six-month results of laparoscopic-based renal denervation plus unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy for the treatment of patients with resistant hypertension caused by unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma

The aim of this study was to explore the long‐term clinical results of Renal denervation (RDN) from the adventitia of the renal artery plus unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy to treat patients with resistant hypertension caused by unilateral aldosterone‐producing adenoma (APA). Sixty patients with resistant hypertension caused by APA who were treated at Henan Provincial People's Hospital from December 2016 to March 2018 were selected and randomly assigned to undergo RDN from the adventitia of the renal artery plus adrenalectomy (RDN group, n = 30) or adrenalectomy alone (control group, n = 30). Office blood pressure (BP), antihypertensive medication usage and other laboratory characteristics were followed every 6 months through 36 months. Follow‐up data were available at 36 months for 23 of 30 subjects in the RDN group and for 21 of 30 subjects who were in the control group. At 36 months postprocedure, the reduction in the RDN group was 42.2 ± 21.6 mmHg and that in the control group was 29.8 ± 13.5 mmHg (p = .029 between the groups). During the follow‐up to 36 months postprocedure, no patients in either the RDN group or the control group died due to surgical complications, and the RDN group had no procedural complications, including renal artery dissection, perforation, and renal artery stenosis. There was no change in the mean eGFR of the two groups, and no serious adverse events were reported. In conclusion, RDN from the adventitia of the renal artery plus unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy resulted in sustained lowering of BP at 3 years in a selected population of subjects with resistant hypertension caused by unilateral APA without serious safety concerns.

A drug-induced hypotensive challenge to verify catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation in an obese hypertensive swine model

Objective

Sham-controlled trials provided proof-of-principle for the blood pressure-lowering effect of catheter-based renal denervation (RDN). However, indicators for the immediate assessment of treatment success are lacking. This study sought to investigate the impact of RDN on renal renin arteriovenous difference (renal renin AV-Δ) following a hypotensive challenge (HC).

Methods

Twelve hypertensive Ossabaw swine underwent either combined surgical and chemical (n = 3) or catheter-based RDN (n = 9). A telemetry monitor was implanted to acquire hemodynamic data continuously. Before and after RDN, a sodium nitroprusside-induced HC was performed. Renal renin AV-Δ was calculated as the difference of plasma renin concentrations drawn from the renal artery and vein.

Results

In total, complete renal renin AV data were obtained in eight animals at baseline and six animals at baseline and 3 months of follow-up. Baseline renal renin AV-Δ correlated inversely with change in 24-h minimum systolic (− 0.764, p = 0.02), diastolic (r = − 0.679, p = 0.04), and mean (r = − 0.663, p = 0.05) blood pressure. In the animals with complete renin secretion data at baseline and follow-up, the HC increased renal renin AV-Δ at baseline, while this effect was attenuated following RDN (0.55 ± 0.34 pg/ml versus − 0.10 ± 0.16 pg/ml, p = 0.003). Renin urinary excretion remained unchanged throughout the study (baseline 0.286 ± 0.187 pg/ml versus termination 0.305 ± 0.072 pg/ml, p = 0.789).

Conclusion

Renin secretion induced by HC was attenuated following RDN and may serve as an indicator for patient selection and guide successful RDN procedures.

Flow Field Analysis in RF Ablation Based on PIV Experiment

Resistant hypertension (RH) is a major healthcare issue, causing cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. In recent years, radiofrequency (RF) ablation to renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) is a new effective method for the treatment of RH. However, the effect of RSD on renal artery blood flow still need further research. In this study, Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) experiment and RF ablation experiment were used to observe the blood flow states in three conditions: no ablation with flow, ablation with no flow, and ablation with flow. The results showed that when the blood flow was 1L/min in renal artery without ablation, it was uniform laminar flow. When the blood was static in renal artery with ablation, there was eddy around the ablation catheter. When the blood flow was 1L/min in renal artery with ablation, the eddy disappeared and the blood flow was uniform laminar flow. Therefore, when the renal artery blood flow is 1L/min, there will be no thrombus and hemolysis in the renal artery due to eddy current and large velocity gradient, which preliminarily verified the safety of the RSD. Keyword: Resistant hypertension; Radiofrequency ablation; Flow field; PIVClinical relevance-When the blood flow of renal artery is 1L/min, there will be no thrombus and hemolysis in renal artery due to eddy current and large velocity gradient during the operation of RF ablation to renal sympathetic denervation.

Effects of renal denervation on kidney function and long-term outcomes: 3-year follow-up from the Global SYMPLICITY Registry

Aims

Several studies and registries have demonstrated sustained reductions in blood pressure (BP) after renal denervation (RDN). The long-term safety and efficacy after RDN in real-world patients with uncontrolled hypertension, however, remains unknown. The objective of this study was to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of RDN, including its effects on renal function.

Methods and results

The Global SYMPLICITY Registry is a prospective, open-label registry conducted at 196 active sites worldwide in hypertensive patients receiving RDN treatment. Among 2237 patients enrolled and treated with the SYMPLICITY Flex catheter, 1742 were eligible for follow-up at 3 years. Baseline office and 24-h ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) were 166 ± 25 and 154 ± 18 mmHg, respectively. SBP reduction after RDN was sustained over 3 years, including decreases in both office (−16.5 ± 28.6 mmHg, P < 0.001) and 24-h ambulatory SBP (−8.0 ± 20.0 mmHg; P < 0.001). Twenty-one percent of patients had a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m². Between baseline and 3 years, renal function declined by 7.1 mL/min/1.73 m² in patients without chronic kidney disease (CKD; eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m²; baseline eGFR 87 ± 17 mL/min/1.73 m²) and by 3.7 mL/min/1.73 m² in patients with CKD (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m²; baseline eGFR 47 ± 11 mL/min/1.73 m²). No long-term safety concerns were observed following the RDN procedure.

Conclusion

Long-term data from the Global SYMPLICITY Registry representing the largest available cohort of hypertensive patients receiving RDN in a real-world clinical setting demonstrate both the safety and efficacy of the procedure with significant and sustained office and ambulatory BP reductions out to 3 years.

Renal denervation improves vascular endothelial dysfunction by inducing autophagy via AMPK/mTOR signaling activation in a rat model of type 2 diabetes mellitus with insulin resistance

BACKGROUND

Recent clinical and animal studies have shown that renal denervation (RDN) improves insulin sensitivity and endothelial dysfunction. However, the specific mechanism remains incompletely understood. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of RDN on endothelial dysfunction of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T₂DM) rat models with insulin resistance and to explore the underlying molecular mechanisms.

METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were fed with or without high-fat diet allocated in different groups, combined with low-dose streptozotocin which induces a rat model to develop T₂DM with insulin resistance. RDN was conducted 1 week after the rat models fully developed T₂DM. The animals were sub-divided into four groups randomly: control group (CON, n = 6), diabetic group (T₂DM, n = 6), diabetic with sham surgery group (Sham, n = 6) and diabetic with RDN group (RDN, n = 6). Rats in all groups were studied at baseline, both preoperatively and 4 weeks after RDN, respectively. Western blot was used to detect the expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) protein and the expression of autophagy-related proteins Beclin1, LC3 and p62 and autophagy signaling pathway AMPK/mTOR proteins and apoptosis-related protein caspase-3 in the aorta endothelial cells. In addition, the effects of ACE2 on autophagy of human umbilical vein insulin resistance endothelial cell culture in vitro were also studied.

RESULTS

RDN decreased plasma and renal tissue norepinephrine levels. The Von Willebrand factor level was also decreased, while the plasma level of nitric oxide (NO) was significantly increased after RDN. Compared with the T₂DM group and the Sham group, the endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent diastolic function of the RDN group was improved significantly, the expression of Beclin1, LC3, ACE2 and eNOS proteins was higher, and the level of p62 protein was decreased. Furthermore, we found that RDN can activate the expression of p-AMPK and inhibit the expression of p-mTOR. In cell culture experiment, ACE2 activated p-AMPK and inhibited p-mTOR, thus promoting autophagy.

CONCLUSIONS

RDN may not only increase the expression of ACE2 in the vascular endothelium, but also can via ACE2 activate p-AMPK and inhibit p-mTOR, thus promoting autophagy and improving endothelial dysfunction.

Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension: Where Do We Stand?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the data about the use of renal denervation (RDN), a minimally invasive surgery, for resistant hypertension (RH) and to provide practical guidance for practitioners who are establishing an RDN service.

RECENT FINDINGS

RDN can selectively ablate renal sympathetic nerve fibres, block the transmission of nerve impulses between central sympathetic nerve and kidney, to control blood pressure to as a novel promising non-drug treatment option for RH. At present, there are many researches on the treatment of RH by RDN, but there are some controversies. This review summarises and critically examines the evidence for RDN in the treatment of RH and identifies areas for future research. With the development of RDN, the continuous innovation of RDN technology and methods, the development about better evaluating the real-time success of RDN and the improvement for identifying individuals who are most likely to benefit from RDN will ultimately determine whether RDN represents a feasible way to manage RH in the future.

Development and Evaluation of a Disease Large Animal Model for Preclinical Assessment of Renal Denervation Therapies

New-generation catheters-based renal denervation (RDN) is under investigation for the treatment of uncontrolled hypertension (HTN). We assessed the feasibility of a large animal model of HTN to accommodate the human RDN devices. Ten minipigs were instrumented to measure blood pressure (BP) in an awake-state. HTN was induced with subcutaneous 11-deoxycorticosterone (DOCA, 100 mg/kg) implants. Five months after, the surviving animals underwent RDN with the Symplicity^® system. Norepinephrine (NE) renal gradients were determined before and 1 month after RDN. Renal arteries were processed for histological (hematoxylin-eosin, Movat pentachrome) and immunohistochemical (S100, tyrosine-hydroxylase) analyses. BP significantly rose after DOCA implants. Six animals died prematurely, mainly from infectious causes. The surviving animals showed stable BP levels after 5 months. One month after RDN, nerve damage was showed in three animals, with impedance drop >10%, NE gradient drop and reduction in BP. The fourth animal showed no nerve damage, impedance drop <10%, NE gradient increase and no change in BP. In conclusion, the minipig model of DOCA-induced HTN is feasible, showing durable effects. High mortality should be addressed in next iterations of this model. RDN may partially offset the DOCA-induced HTN. Impedance drop and NE renal gradient could be markers of RDN success.

Resistant Hypertension: Where are We Now and Where Do We Go from Here?

Resistant hypertension is an important subtype of hypertension that leads to an increased risk of cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, and kidney disease. The revised guidelines from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association now define resistant hypertension as blood pressure that remains above goal despite use of three maximally titrated anti-hypertensive medications including a diuretic or as a hypertensive patient who requires 4 or more agents for adequate BP control. These agents typically include a calcium-channel blocker, a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor, and a diuretic at maximal or maximally tolerated doses. As recognition of resistant hypertension increases, it is important to distinguish pseudo-resistant or apparent hypertension from true resistant hypertension. Etiologies of apparent resistant hypertension include measurement error and medication non-adherence. The prevalence of true resistant hypertension is likely much lower than reported in the literature when accounting for patients with apparent resistant hypertension. Evaluation of patients with true resistant hypertension includes screening for causes of secondary hypertension and interfering medications. Successful management of resistant hypertension includes lifestyle modification and optimization of medical therapy, often including the use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Looking ahead at developments in hypertension management, a slew of new device-based therapies are under active development. Of these, renal denervation is the closest to routine clinical application. Further study is needed before these devices can be recommended in the routine treatment of resistant hypertension.

Evaluation of Transcatheter Alcohol-Mediated Perivascular Renal Denervation to Treat Resistant Hypertension

Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) has been investigated for hypertension (HTN) treatment with variable success. One of the novel approaches to RDN is the delivery of micro-doses of dehydrated alcohol to the adventitial space of the renal artery to perform perivascular ablation of the sympathetic nerves. We sought to assess the safety and efficiency of transcatheter alcohol-mediated perivascular renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension. Fifty adult patients who had been referred for resistant HTN were screened. To qualify for the study, the patients had to have a mean 24 h systolic pressure ≥ 135 mmHg based upon ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and acceptable renal artery anatomy confirmed by the contrast computer tomography (AngioCT) and nephrologist consultation. Ten patients were eligible for chemical RND. There were no safety issues throughout the 24 months of follow-ups. The mean decrease in the office BP (OBP) was significant during 24 months of follow-up (p < 0.01). The difference in the BP in the ABPM was statistically significant in the 1st, 3rd and 12th months (p < 0.01), whereas during the 3-month follow-up, a trend was observed. The modifications of anti-hypertension drugs throughout the follow-up period were minimal. This study has shown that transcatheter alcohol-mediated renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension is feasible and safe. Nevertheless, it is a hypothesis-generating study.