Long-term forecasting and comparison of mortality in the Evaluation of the Xience Everolimus Eluting Stent vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization (EXCEL) trial: prospective validation of the SYNTAX Score II

CatLet score and clinical CatLet score as predictors of long-term outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting later than 12 hours from symptom onset

BACKGROUND

Our recently developed Coronary Artery Tree description and Lesion EvaluaTion (CatLet) angiographic scoring system is unique in its description of the variability in the coronary anatomy, the degree of stenosis of a diseased coronary artery, and its subtended myocardial territory, and can be utilized to predict clinical outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) presenting ≤12 h after symptom onset. The current study aimed to assess whether the Clinical CatLet score (CCS), as compared with CatLet score (CS), better predicted clinical outcomes for AMI patients presenting >12 h after symptom onset.

METHODS

CS was calculated in 1018 consecutive AMI patients enrolled in a retrospective registry. CCS was calculated by multiplying CS by the ACEF I score (age, creatinine, and left ventricular ejection fraction). Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 4-year-follow-up, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization.

RESULTS

Over a 4-year follow-up period, both scores were independent predictors of clinical outcomes after adjustment for a broad spectrum of risk factors. Areas-under-the-curve (AUCs) for CS and CCS were 0.72(0.68-0.75) and 0.75(0.71-0.78) for MACEs; 0.68(0.63-0.73) and 0.78(0.74-0.83) for all-cause death; 0.73(0.68-0.79) and 0.83(0.79-0.88) for cardiac death; and 0.69(0.64-0.73) and 0.75(0.7-0.79) for myocardial infarction; and 0.66(0.61-0.7) and 0.63(0.58-0.68) for revascularization, respectively. CCS performed better than CS in terms of the above-mentioned outcome predictions, as confirmed by the net reclassification and integrated discrimination indices.

CONCLUSIONS

CCS was better than CS to be able to risk-stratify long-term outcomes in AMI patients presenting >12 h after symptom onset. These findings have indicated that both anatomic and clinical variables should be considered in decision-making on management of patients with AMI presenting later.

External validation of the SYNTAX score II 2020 in patients with chronic renal insufficiency

BACKGROUND

The SYNTAX score Ⅱ 2020 (SSⅡ-2020) was created as a customized decision-making tool for individuals diagnosed with complex coronary artery disease (CAD). Nevertheless, there has been a scarcity of research investigating the long-term predictive significance of SSⅡ-2020 for patients with both CAD and chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

AIMS

We sought to showcase the prognostic capacity of SSII-2020 in evaluating long-term all-cause mortality (ACM) within this high-risk patient cohort.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort comprising 1156 individuals diagnosed with CRI and exhibiting left main CAD, three-vessel CAD or both was included in this investigation. We categorized participants into three groups based on the optimal SSII-2020 threshold for predicting long-term ACM, determined using the X-tile software.

RESULTS

At the median follow-up duration of 6.3 years, the ACM rates were determined to be 10% in the low, 17% in the moderate, and 28% in the high SSII-2020 groups (p < 0.001). Employing multivariate Cox regression analysis, it was observed that the high SSII-2020 group exhibited a 3.289-fold increased risk of ACM (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.229-4.856, p < 0.001) compared with the low SSII-2020 group, whereas the high SSII-2020 group displayed a 1.757-fold (95% CI: 1.190-2.597, p = 0.005) in comparison to the median SSII-2020 groups. Compared with SSII, the SSII-2020 had an incremental value for predicting 7-year ACM (C-index: 0.662 vs. 0.534, p = 0.007; IDI: 0.016, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SSII-2020 enhances long-term ACM prediction, facilitates improved risk stratification, and improves clinical utility for PCI patients with complex CAD and CRI.

Anatomical and clinical risk stratification tool for mortality risk assessment following revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the prognostic ability of SYNTAX score II in left main and/or 3-vessel disease patients undergoing revascularization either by coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention in a national registry.

METHODS

This prospective registry included consecutive patients with multivessel disease enrolled between January and April 2013 from all 22 hospitals in Israel that perform coronary angiography. Of the 1112 study patients, 368 patients (33%) had a low (<25), 372 (33%) had an intermediate (25-35) and 372 patients (33%) a high (≥35) SYNTAX score II.

RESULTS

Patients with a high SYNTAX score II had higher 30-day mortality compared with those with an intermediate or low SYNTAX score II (2.8% vs 0.6% vs 0% respectively, P = .001). Each 1-unit increment in SYNTAX score II increased the odds for death at 30 days by 11% (95% CI, 1.02-1.22; P = .026). Six-year mortality was higher among patients with a high compared with an intermediate or low SYNTAX score II (34.9% vs 11% vs 3.8%; log-rank P < .001). By adding a SYNTAX score II to standard prognostic factors, we showed a significant improvement of 40.1% (P < .001) for predicting 6-year mortality. The area under the curve of the SYNTAX score II (continuous) yielded 0.79 (95% CI, 0.75-0.82) in predicting 6-year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that the admission SYNTAX score II is a powerful marker of short- and long-term mortality, and therefore may be used as a risk stratification tool in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who are candidates for revascularization.

Holistic review and meta-analysis of independent impact of the residual SYNTAX score on prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Objectives. The appropriate extent of revascularization following primary intervention is unknown. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of residual Syntax score (rSS) to predict the outcomes and provide guide to optimal management of revascularization following primary intervention. Designs. Previously published studies from 2007 to 2020 assessing the prognostic impact of rSS after ACS were included for this meta-analysis. The primary endpoint was defined as the major adverse clinical events (MACE) in multivariable analysis. The risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the RevMan 5.4 software. Results. A total of 8,157 participants complicated with ACS from 12 clinical studies were included in this analysis. Based on the wide range of rSS studies available, we classified it into two major groups: rSS < 8 and rSS ≥ 8. In multivariate analysis, the rSS was an independent risk marker for MACE [RR = 1.04 (95%CI; 1.00-1.08)], all-cause mortality [RR = 1.05 (1.03-1.07)] and cardiovascular death [RR = 1.05 (1.03-1.07)]. Patients with incomplete revascularization (ICR) showed higher prevalence of MACE along with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular morality, and recurrent myocardial infarction without significant heterogeneity [RR = 1.60 (1.03-1.07), 2.30 (1.57-3.38), 3.57 (2.09-6.10) and 1.70 (1.38-2.09), respectively]. The patients with rSS ≥ 8 presented higher frequency of all-cause mortality [RR = 2.99 (2.18-4.09)], cardiovascular death [RR = 3.32 (2.22-4.95)], and recurrent myocardial infarction [RR = 1.64 (1.34-2.02)]. Conclusion. The meta-analysis indicated that an rSS value of 8 could be a reasonable cut-off for incomplete revascularization after ACS and is an efficient tool to guide revascularization. In future, detailed research should focus on investigation of the optimal value of the rSS score.

Coronary atherosclerotic burden assessed by SYNTAX scores and outcomes in surgical, percutaneous or medical strategies: a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Coronary atherosclerotic burden and SYNTAX Score (SS) are predictors of cardiovascular events.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the value of SYNTAX scores (SS, SYNTAX Score II (SSII) and residual SYNTAX Score (rSS)) for predicting cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single tertiary centre.

PARTICIPANTS

Medicine, Angioplasty or Surgery Study database patients with stable multivessel CAD and preserved ejection fraction.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients with CAD undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or medical treatment (MT) alone from January 2002 to December 2015.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Primary: 5-year all-cause mortality. Secondary: composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke and subsequent coronary revascularisation at 5 years.

RESULTS

A total of 1719 patients underwent PCI (n=573), CABG (n=572) or MT (n=574) alone. The SS was not considered an independent predictor of 5-year mortality in the PCI (low, intermediate and high SS at 6.5%, 6.8% and 4.3%, respectively, p=0.745), CABG (low, intermediate and high SS at 5.7%, 8.0% and 12.1%, respectively, p=0.194) and MT (low, intermediate and high SS at 6.8%, 6.9% and 6.5%, respectively, p=0.993) cohorts. The SSII (low, intermediate and high SSII at 3.6% vs 7.9% vs 10.5%, respectively, p<0.001) was associated with a higher mortality risk in the overall population. Within each treatment strategy, SSII was associated with a significant 5-year mortality rate, especially in CABG patients with higher SSII (low, intermediate and high SSII at 1.8%, 9.7% and 10.0%, respectively, p=0.004) and in MT patients with high SSII (low, intermediate and high SSII at 5.0%, 4.7% and 10.8%, respectively, p=0.031). SSII demonstrated a better predictive accuracy for mortality compared with SS and rSS (c-index=0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary atherosclerotic burden alone was not associated with significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality. The SSII better discriminates the risk of death.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN66068876.

Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in high-risk patients turned down for surgical revascularization

AIMS

There are limited data on outcomes of PCI in surgical turndown patientsespecially in those presenting with ACS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients who were turned down for CABG and had PCI between 2013 and 2020. All consecutive patients (449), ACS (n = 245) and no-ACS (n = 204) were included. In-hospital complications occurred in 28 patients (6.2%). At 30 days, 27 patients (6.0%) died (18 patients in the ACS group [7.3%] vs. 9 patients in the no-ACS group [4.4%], p = 0.23). Following multivariate analysis, no significant difference in long-term mortality was observed between the two groups (median follow-up of 4 [2-6] years, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-1.58, p = 0.667). In propensity score-matched analysis, the adjusted mortality risk was also not different between the groups (HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.25-1.26, p = 0.374). Independent predictors of mortality included chronic kidney disease stage ≥ 3 (HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.13-2.39, p = 0.009), high European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.05, p = 0.035), and laser atherectomy use (HR: 3.35, 95% CI: 1.32-8.54, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

PCI in surgical patients turndown patients appears safe. ACSpresentation was associated with more comorbid illnesses; however, afteradjustment, ACS did not independently confer additional risk of mortality.

Association between SYNTAX II Score and late saphenous vein graft failure in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery

OBJECTIVE

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is a well-established treatment modality for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Syntax II Score has been established as novel scoring system with better prediction of postprocedural outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of SYNTAX II Score for predicting late saphenous vein graft (SVG) failure in patients undergoing isolated CABG.

METHODS

The records of 1,875 consecutive patients who underwent isolated CABG with at least one SVG were investigated. Those who underwent coronary angiography and SVGs angiography at least 1 year after the CABG were included. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of SVG failure. For each group, predictors of late SVG failure and subsequent clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

According to this study, the presence of hypertension, higher rates of repeat revascularization, and higher SYNTAX II Scores were found to be independent predictors of late SVG failure. In addition, the prognostic value of SYNTAX II Score was found to be significantly higher than anatomical SYNTAX Score in terms of predicting late SVG failure and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a strong association between SYNTAX II Score and late SVG failure in patients undergoing isolated CABG.

Comparison of multiple risk scores in assessing medium-to long-term clinical outcomes in unstable angina / non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing multi vessel percutaneous coronary intervention: An observational, registry-based study in India

Objective

Post-revascularization mortality in multivessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD) has been explored via several risk scores. Here, we assessed and compared various risk scores in predicting medium to long-term clinical outcomes in unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI) patients with MVCAD undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

We analyzed a cohort of a tertiary care center registry enrolling patients in South India, Kerala, with MVCAD (N = 200) who had undergone PCI between 2010 and 2018. The outcomes evaluated were all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The risk scores assessed included SYNTAX score (SS), residual SYNTAX score (rSS), SYNTAX revascularization index (SRI), age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score, clinical SYNTAX score (cSS), and SYNTAX score II (SSII).

Results

Of the analyzed risk scores, SSII had the best predictive capability with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 in c-statistics, followed by ACEF score and cSS with AUCs of 0.74 and 0.65, respectively for all-cause mortality (p < 0.01). Kaplan–Meier survival curves and multivariate analysis by Cox regression showed SSII with cut-offs of >35.15 and > 29.55 to be the only score associated with higher mortality and MACE, respectively.

Conclusions

In UA/NSTEMI patients with relatively less complex MVCAD treated by PCI, the SSII, ACEF and cSS risk scores could predict the outcomes better. The SSII showed the best predictive performance for all-cause mortality and MACE. Scores based on baseline and residual atherosclerotic burden (SS, rSS, and SRI) performed poorly in predicting the mortality and MACE.

External Validation of the SYNTAX Score II 2020

BACKGROUND

The SYNTAX score II 2020 (SSII-2020) was derived from cross correlation and externally validated in randomized trials to predict death and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACE) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with 3-vessel disease (3VD) and/or left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD).

OBJECTIVES

The authors aimed to investigate the SSII-2020's value in identifying the safest modality of revascularization in a non-randomized setting.

METHODS

Five-year mortality and MACE were assessed in 7,362 patients with 3VD and/or LMCAD enrolled in a Japanese PCI/CABG registry. The discriminative abilities of the SSII-2020 were assessed using Harrell's C statistic. Agreement between observed and predicted event rates following PCI or CABG and treatment benefit (absolute risk difference [ARD]) for these outcomes were assessed by calibration plots.

RESULTS

The SSII-2020 for 5-year mortality well predicted the prognosis after PCI and CABG (C-index = 0.72, intercept = -0.11, slope = 0.92). When patients were grouped according to the predicted 5-year mortality ARD, <4.5% (equipoise of PCI and CABG) and ≥4.5% (CABG better), the observed mortality rates after PCI and CABG were not significantly different in patients with lower predicted ARD (observed ARD: 2.1% [95% CI: -0.4% to 4.4%]), and the significant difference in survival in favor of CABG was observed in patients with higher predicted ARD (observed ARD: 9.7% [95% CI: 6.1%-13.3%]). For MACE, the SSII-2020 could not recommend a specific treatment with sufficient accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

The SSII-2020 for predicting 5-year death has the potential to support decision making on revascularization in patients with 3VD and/or LMCAD.

Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass in High-Risk Patients with Multivessel Disease

BACKGROUND

 High-risk patients with multivessel disease (MVD) including a complex stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary may not be ideal candidates for guideline compliant therapy by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) regarding invasiveness and perioperative complications. However, they may benefit from minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) grafting and hybrid revascularization (HCR).

METHODS

 A logistic European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation score (logES) >10% defined high risk. In high-risk patients with MVD undergoing MIDCAB or HCR, the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) after 30 days and during midterm follow-up was evaluated.

RESULTS

 Out of 1,250 patients undergoing MIDCAB at our institution between 1998 and 2015, 78 patients (logES: 18.5%; age, 76.7 ± 8.6 years) met the inclusion criteria. During the first 30 days, mortality and rate of MACCE were 9.0%; early mortality was two-fold overestimated by logES. Complete revascularization as scheduled was finally achieved in 64 patients (82.1%). Median follow-up time reached 3.4 (1.2-6.5) years with a median survival time of 4.7 years. Survival after 1, 3, and 5 years was 77, 62, and 48%.

CONCLUSION

 In high-risk patients with MVD, MIDCAB is associated with acceptable early outcome which is better than predicted by logES. Taking the high-risk profile into consideration, midterm follow-up showed satisfying results, although scheduled HCR was not realized in a relevant proportion. In selected cases of MVD, MIDCAB presents an acceptable alternative for high-risk patients.

Fallacies and Possible Remedies of the SYNTAX Score

Quite a few studies have revealed the clinical values regarding the outcome predictions in the cohort of the Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial and decision-making with the SYNTAX score. The Evaluation of Xience Everolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left-Main Revascularization (EXCEL) and Nordic-Baltic-British left main revascularization (NOBLE) studies are the largest international randomized studies so far, comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in the treatment of left main coronary artery disease. Unfortunately, both studies failed to validate the value of the SYNTAX score in the selection of revascularization strategies for patients with coronary artery diseases (CAD).. This scenario prompted us to reconsider the inherent fallacies of the SYNTAX score in its derivation. We pointed out eight fallacies for the SYNTAX score in this paper. A recently developed Coronary Artery Tree description and Lesion EvaluaTion (CatLet) score, available at http://www.catletscore.com, a novel angiographic scoring system, could be the remedies for the SYNTAX score.

Do EXCEL and NOBLE translate into real world? A 5-year observational study of left main stem outcomes

AIMS

We aimed to uncover the 5-year real world outcomes of patients with significant left mainstem (LMS) disease managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or medical management.

METHODS

We identified patients with LMS disease in 2012 and analysed baseline characteristics and outcomes in the following 5 years.

RESULTS

119 patients were identified, 62% (74) received CABG and 12% (14) received PCI and 26% (31) were medically managed. In PCI versus CABG, there was no significant difference in age and Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery score but there were significantly higher rates of pretreatment heart failure (ejection fraction 42%±10 vs 52%±13p=0.01). Overall major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) being a composite of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularisation and all-cause mortality were not statistically different but numerically higher in the PCI group (36% (5) vs 23% (17) p=0.12). Medically managed patients were significantly older than those that were revascularised (PCI or CABG n=88; 75±11 vs 69±9 years p=0.01). They also had higher MACE (74% (23) vs 25% (22) p=0.000002) driven by MI (19% (6) vs 2% (1) p=0.01) and all-cause mortality (52% (16) vs 19% (17) p=0.01) compared with those with revascularisation.

CONCLUSIONS

The bleak outcomes of medical management in LMS disease are reflective findings from studies performed from several decades ago. Our findings show that there is still a role for PCI in the management of LMS disease in selected patients.

A Widow-Maker and a Doppelganger: An Anomalous Case of the Coronaries

The anomalous origin of the left circumflex (LCX) artery from the right coronary sinus is a relatively rare condition. A ‘double’ left anterior descending (LAD) artery is probably the rarest of coronary artery anomalies. We present a case of acute myocardial infarction with a clot and a critical distal stenosis in the left main stem (LMS) supplying a dual LAD and an aberrant origin of the LCX.

Impact of preoperative SYNTAX Scores on short-term outcome following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in the patients with multi-vessels coronary artery disease

Background

SYNTAX Scores I (SSI) assesses the complexity of CAD; SYNTAX Score II (SSII) uses both SSI and other clinical variables, in estimation of 4 years mortality following both coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and gives recommendations for the best revascularization strategy in a specific patient. Our aim is to investigate the impact of both SYNTAX Scores on short-term outcome following CABG.

Results

Prospectively, we studied 150 patients with multi-vessels coronary artery disease, referred to perform, elective primary isolated CABG. All cases performed on pump CABG with aortic cross clamping, then followed up for 90 days postoperatively, for onset of mortality from all causes, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, mediastinitis, and need for renal replacement therapy (RRT).

SSI showed a statistically significant association with in-hospital and 90 days mortality, MI, and mediastinitis (P = < 0.001, 0.015, 0.045 respectively); SSII showed a statistically significant association with in-hospital mortality and 90 days mortality and need for renal replacement therapy (P = 0.007, 0.043, 0.012 respectively); SSI is independent risk factor for overall mortality (OR 1.192, 95% CI 1.018–1.396) (P = 0.029) and MI (OR 1.182, 95% CI 1.016–1.375).

Conclusions

SYNTAX Scores are good predictors of short-term outcome after CABG; increased SSI was associated with increased mortalities (in-hospital and total 90 days), MI and mediastinitis, increased SSII associated with increased mortalities (in-hospital and total 90 days), and need for RRT; SSI is independent risk factor for mortality and MI.

Validation of the long-term prognostic capability of the SYNTAX score II in patients undergoing biodegradable polymer-based Sirolimus-eluting stents: 2-year outcomes from the PANDA III trial

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the prognostic ability of SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) Score II (SS-II) in LM and/or TVD patients undergoing biodegradable polymer-based drug-eluting stents (BP-DES) in the multi-central randomized PANDA III trial.

METHODS

A total of 723 patients in PANDA III population were enrolled in this study. According to SS-II tertiles, patients were stratified as follow: SS-II ≤ 23 (n = 224), 23 < SS II ≤ 31 (n = 255), SS II > 31 (n = 244). The predictive abilities for 2-year cardiac death were compared between angiographic scores and scores combining both angiographic and clinical variables.

RESULTS

Mean anatomic SS was 20.6 ± 9.4, SS-II for PCI was 28.7 ± 8.6. During 2-year follow up, cardiac death (0.00% vs. 1.7% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.003) and target lesion failure (5.9% vs. 9.1% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.020) was significantly higher in the upper tertile group than in intermedian and low tertile. At multivariate analysis, SS-II for PCI was an independent risk factor of cardiac death (Hazard ratio: 2.41, 95%CI: 1.47-3.97, p < 0.005) and TLF (Hazard ratio: 1.29, 95%CI: 1.01-1.65, p = 0.040). The ROC curve analysis showed that SS-II for PCI had better ability than other SYNTAX scoring systems to predict cardiac death (AUC: 0.746, 95%CI:0.63-0.87, p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

The SS-II had superiority than other SYNTAX scoring systems in predicting 2-year cardiac death in LM and/or TVD patients undergoing PCI with biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents.

Prognosis evaluation of universal acute coronary syndrome: the interplay between SYNTAX score and ApoB/ApoA1

Background

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a group of clinical syndromes associated with substantial morbidity and mortality rate. SYNTAX and SYNTAX II score used to be a reference for surgical selection of coronary revascularization and prognosis evaluation in patients with 3-vessel or left main artery disease. In addition, apoB/apoA1 is an important predictor of ACS risk. This study aims to assess the prognosis value of different kinds of SYNTAX score together with apoB/apoA1 in universal ACS patients (Regardless of ACS type, lesion location and vessel numbers).

Method

Three hundred ninety-six patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)and coronary stenting from 2013 to 2014 were chosen and recorded the major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and quality of life during the next 5 years. According to SYNTAX and SYNTAX II score, the patients were divided into low-risk, medium-risk and high-risk groups, and the clinical features, MACCE incidence and EQ-5D score at each time points were compared. And the predictive factors of MACCE incidence were analyzed.

Results

① Compared with SYNTAX low-risk group, MACCE incidence in 1 year significantly increased in medium/high risk group (p = 0.011). Compared with SYNTAX II low-risk group, MACCE incidence in 5 years significantly increased in medium and high-risk group (p = 0.032). ② Compared with SYNTAX II low-risk group, cardiovascular mortality in 3 and 5 years significantly elevated in high-risk group (p = 0.001, p<0.001 respectively). ③ Compared with SYNTAX II low and medium-risk group, EQ-5D score in 5 years significantly decreased in high-risk group (p = 0.019, p = 0.023 respectively). ④ ApoB/ApoA1 was more likely to be classified as high risk in SYNTAX/SYNTAX II medium and high-risk group (p = 0.023, p = 0.044 respectively). ⑤ Logistic regression analysis showed that apoB/apoA1 was an independent predictor of MACCE events in hospital and 5 years (p = 0.038, p = 0.016 respectively), SYNTAX score was an independent predictor of MACCE events in 1 year (medium-risk group: p = 0.02; high-risk group: p = 0.015) SYNTAX II score was an independent predictor of MACCE events in 5 yeasrs (p = 0.003).

Conclusions

① SYNTAX score has a high predictive value for short-term prognosis while SYNTAX II score is more predictive of long-term prognosis. ② SYNTAX II score is superior to SYNTAX score in predicting cardiovascular death. ③ The combination of apoB/apoA1 high-risk and SYNTAX II medium and high-risk group is the focus of clinical treatment and long-term follow-up observation.

ApPropRiateness of myOcardial revascUlarization assessed by SYNTAX Scores in patients with type 2 diabetes melliTus: the PROUST study

INTRODUCTION

Results of currently available trials have shown divergent outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Current guidelines do not recommend PCI in patients with diabetes and a SYNTAX score ≥ 23.

AIM

To compare all-cause 4-year mortality after revascularization for complex coronary artery disease (CAD) in diabetics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study group comprised consecutive patients with three-vessel CAD and/or unprotected left main CAD (≥ 50% diameter stenosis) without major hemodynamic instability, who were treated in two institutions with PCI or referred for CABG.

RESULTS

Out of 342 diabetics, 177 patients underwent PCI and 165 patients were referred for CABG. The incidence of all-cause death was different between diabetics treated with PCI or CABG at 4 years (16/177, 9.0% vs. 26/165, 15.8%, respectively, p = 0.03). The difference was not evident in non-diabetics (PCI: 41/450, 9.1% vs. CABG: 19/249, 7.6%, p = 0.173). In diabetics, there was a higher incidence of all-cause mortality in PCI patients with intermediate-high (≥ 23) SYNTAX scores compared with those with low (0-22) SYNTAX scores (10/56, 17.9% vs. 6/121, 5.0%, respectively, p < 0.01). On the other hand, diabetics who underwent CABG showed similar mortality rates irrespective of the SYNTAX scores (SYNTAX 0-22: 3/29, 10.3%; SYNTAX ≥ 23: 23/136, 11.9%, p = 0.46). In the subgroup analysis, there was no interaction according to presence or absence of left main CAD (p for interaction = 0.12) as well as according to diabetes status (p for interaction = 0.38), whereas gender and SYNTAX scores were differentiators between PCI and CABG with a p for interaction < 0.1.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis supports recent evidence that diabetes is not a differentiator between PCI and CABG.

Left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

The optimal coronary revascularization strategy for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a drug-eluting stent (DES) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with ULMCA disease with or without LVSD.

METHODS

A total of 984 patients with ULMCA disease who received a DES (n = 511) or underwent CABG (n = 473) were included in this study. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical parameters and outcomes of ULMCA disease patients with different left ventricular ejection fraction levels.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in major adverse cardiac and cerebral events, all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stroke between the CABG and DES groups with or without LVSD. The rate of target vessel revascularization was significantly higher with DES compared with CABG in patients without LVSD; however, the difference was not significant between the mild LVSD and severe LVSD groups.

CONCLUSION

For patients with ULMCA disease and LVSD, there was no significant difference between DES and CABG in terms of efficacy and safety. Treatment with DES was an acceptable alternative to CABG.

Safety and efficacy of a novel algorithm to guide decision-making in high-risk interventional coronary procedures

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe coronary artery disease (CAD), comorbidities, or impaired hemodynamics are at risk during percutaneous coronary interventions. The aim of the study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a novel risk-stratification algorithm for high-risk coronary procedures.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively screened 1189 patients with CAD requiring revascularization (period 07/2017-06/2018). The algorithm was designed to select high-risk procedures. Patients with elevated risk (n = 150) were classified into 3 risk groups (high-risk intervention [HRI] I-III) and procedural management was adjusted according to HRI group. Overall, 55 patients were categorized as HRI I, 52 as HRI II, and 43 as HRI III. With increasing HRI-level, SYNTAX score increased (HRI I:15 ± 5% vs. HRI II:24 ± 8% vs. HRI III:34 ± 7%; p < 0.001), and ejection-fraction decreased (HRI I:48 ± 10% vs. HRI II:49 ± 10% vs. HRI III:40 ± 11%; p < 0.001). The primary endpoint (hemodynamic compromise requiring mechanical circulatory support [MCS] [HRI I/II], unsuccessful weaning from MCS in the catheterization laboratory[HRI III], or periprocedural death[HRI I-III]) occurred in no case. The secondary endpoint of hemodynamic deterioration occurred in 26% (n = 39) but did not result in hemodynamic instability due to the risk-adjusted procedural management. The composite endpoint of in-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (death, new myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident) occurred in 4 patients (3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The novel algorithm is a safe team-based stratification method for the identification and management of patients undergoing high-risk coronary interventions.

A simple-to-use nomogram to predict long term survival of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting technique

BACKGROUND

Several risk scores have been created to predict long term mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Several studies demonstrated a reduction in long-term mortality following bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) compared to single internal thoracic artery. However, these prediction models usually referred to long term survival as survival of up to 5 years. Moreover, none of these models were built specifically for operation incorporating BITA grafting.

METHODS

A historical cohort study of all patients who underwent isolated BITA grafting between 1996 and 2011 at Tel-Aviv Sourasky medical center, a tertiary referral university affiliated medical center with a 24-bed cardio-thoracic surgery department. Study population (N = 2,935) was randomly divided into 2 groups: learning group which was used to build the prediction model and validation group. Cox regression was used to predict death using pre-procedural risk factors (demographic data, patient comorbidities, cardiac characteristics and patient's status). The accuracy (discrimination and calibration) of the prediction model was evaluated.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

The learning (1,468 patients) and validation (1,467 patients) groups had similar preoperative characteristics and similar survival. Older age, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive lung disease, congestive heart failure, chronic renal failure, old MI, ejection fraction ≤30%, pre-operative use of intra-aortic balloon, and peripheral vascular disease, were significant predictors of mortality and were used to build the prediction model. The area under the ROC curves for 5, 10, and 15-year survival ranged between 0.742 and 0.762 for the learning group and between 0.766 and 0.770 for the validation group. The prediction model showed good calibration performance in both groups. A nomogram was built in order to introduce a simple-to-use tool for prediction of 5, 10, and 15-year survival.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple-to-use validated model can be used for a prediction of 5, 10, and 15-year mortality after CABG using the BITA grafting technique.

Prognostic impact of the SYNTAX score II in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis of a four-year all-comers registry

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of the SYNTAX score II (SS-II) on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This retrospective cohort study included 1,689 patients with STEMI who underwent pPCI between January 2008 and December 2016. The patients were categorised into three groups based on SS-II tertiles (SS-II low tertile <24 [n=585], SS-II intermediate tertile ≥24 and ≤34 [n=567], and SS-II high tertile >34 [n=537]). In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in patients with low and mid SS-II when compared with high SS-II (0.7% vs 0.5% vs 16.4%, p=0.001). During follow-up (median 2.35 years), a high SS-II was positively correlated with MACE (12.3% for low SS-II vs 18.3% for mid SS-II vs 43.2% for high SS-II, p=0.001), all-cause mortality (1.5% vs 3.9% vs 14.2%, p=0.001) and heart failure (0.3% vs 2.7% vs 8.2%, p=0.001). The SS-II showed additive value on top of GRACE, anatomical SYNTAX score and residual SYNTAX score.

CONCLUSIONS

The SS-II in patients with STEMI undergoing pPCI adds important prognostic information regarding midterm adverse outcomes, being an independent and powerful predictor of MACE, heart failure and all-cause mortality during follow-up.

Prediction of long-term patient outcome after contemporary left main stenting using the SYNTAX and SYNTAX II scores: A comparative analysis from the FAIL-II multicenter registry (failure in left main study with 2nd generation stents-Cardiogroup III study)

AIMS

To establish the value of the SYNTAX Score-II (SS-II) in predicting long-term mortality of patients treated with left main PCI (LM-PCI) using second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The SYNTAX score (SS) and the SS-II were calculated in 804 patients included in the FAILS-2 registry (failure in left main study with 2nd generation stents). Patients were classified in low (SS-II ≤33; n = 278, 34.6%), intermediate (SS-II 34-43; n = 260, 32.3%) and high (SS-II ≥44; n = 266, 33.1%) SS-II tertiles. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. A significant difference in long-term mortality was noted (5.2 ± 3.6 years): 4.1, 7.5, and 16.7% in low, mid and high SS-II tertiles respectively (p < .001). SS-II score was more accurate in predicting mortality than SS (AUC = 0.73; 95%CI: 0.67-0.79 vs. AUC = 0.55; 95%CI: 0.48-0.63, respectively; p < .001). SS-II led to a reclassification in the risk of all-cause mortality re-allocating 73% of patients from the CABG-only indication to PCI or equipoise PCI-or-CABG indication. Using multiple Cox regression analysis, SS-II (HR: 1.07; 95%CI: 1.05-1.09; p < .001), along with Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (HR: 1.66; 95%CI: 1.03-2.66; p = .07) and Cardiogenic shock (CS) (HR: 2.82 (95%CI: 1.41-5.64; p = .003) were independent predictors of long-term mortality. SS-II (HR: 1.05; 95%CI: 1.04-1.06; p < .001) along with Insulin dependent Type 2 DM (HR: 1.58, 95%CI: 1.09-2.30.; p < .05), ACS (HR: 1.58, 95%CI: 1.16-2.14; p < .001) and CS (HR: 2.02 95%CI 1.16-3.53; p < .05), were independent predictors of long-term MACE.

CONCLUSION

The SS-II was superior to the SS in predicting outcomes associated with contemporary LM-PCI. In this real-world population, two clinical variables not included in the SS-II, ACS and T2DM, were identified as additional markers of poor outcome.

Predictive value of combining the SYNTAX score with reactive hyperemia index in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the predictive value of SYNTAX (Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score (SS) combined with reactive hyperemia index (RHI) in predicting 2-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

Both SS and RHI are good predictors of MACE; however, it is unknown whether combining SS and RHI could improve predictability of MACE in patients with ACS undergoing PCI.

METHODS

We undertook a prospective study in 401 ACS patients that underwent PCI. The RHI-SYNTAX score (RSS) was calculated by categorizing and summing up the RHI and SS of individual patients. Patients with RHI < 1.67 are given 1 point, RHI ≥ 1.67 given 0 points, and those with SS ≤ 22 scored as 0 and SS > 22 as 1 point. Patients were classified into three groups: low RSS (group 0), moderate RSS (group 1), and high RSS (group 2).

RESULTS

Among patients in the low, moderate, and high groups, the 2-year rates of MACE were 5.50, 10.66, and 23.33%, respectively (p < .0001). Total revascularization rates were 1.83, 2.54, and 8.89%, respectively (p = .015). Ischemic stroke rates were 0.00, 3.67, and 5.56%, respectively (p = .031). By multivariate analysis, the RSS was an independent predictor of 2-year MACE (hazard ratio: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.36-3.21, p = .001). Receiver-operator characteristic analysis indicated that the area under the curve significantly improved from 0.63 to 0.69, when RHI was added to SS (p < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

RSS is correlated with 2-year MACE in patients presenting with ACS undergoing PCI.

Implications of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with three-vessel disease

Aims

Risk assessment and treatment stratification for three-vessel disease (3VD) remain challenging. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is an established biomarker for prognostication and treatment in heart failure. The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of NT-proBNP beyond the SYNTAX score II (SSII), and its association with long-term outcome after three strategies [percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and medical therapy (MT)] in a cohort of patients with 3VD.

Methods and results

A total of 6597 patients with available baseline NT-proBNP data were included in the study. Baseline, procedural, and follow-up data were collected. The primary endpoint was all-cause death. Secondary endpoints included cardiac death and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. During a median follow-up of 7.0 years, higher NT-proBNP levels were strongly associated with increased risks of all-cause death, cardiac death, and MACCE (all adjusted P < 0.01). Moreover, NT-proBNP significantly improved discrimination and reclassification of the SSII. Notably, there was a significant interaction between NT-proBNP quartiles and treatment strategies for MACCE (P = 0.004). Revascularization was associated with lower risks of MACCE than MT, except for patients in the lowest quartile wherein no such association was observed. Among patients in the highest quartile, PCI was associated with an increased risk of MACCE compared with CABG (hazard ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 1.09–1.87).

Conclusion

N-terminal pro-BNP is a potential biomarker for risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making in patients with 3VD. Further randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Association of Excessive Speed Reduction with Clinical Factors During Rotational Atherectomy

BACKGROUND

Although the manufacturer recommends that excessive speed reduction (>5000 rpm) be avoided during rotational atherectomy (RA) for safety, excessive speed reduction is sometimes observed in clinical practice. The purpose of the present study was to examine the factors associated with excessive speed reduction during RA.

METHODS

Lesions (n = 300) treated by RA were divided into 3 groups: a mild speed reduction group (≤5000 rpm) (n = 182), a moderate speed reduction group (>5000-≤10,000 rpm) (n = 97), and a severe speed reduction group (>10,000 rpm) (n = 21). Two multivariate logistic regression analyses was performed to investigate the factors associated with >5000 rpm speed reduction, and factors associated with >10,000 rpm speed reduction.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that an ostial right coronary artery (RCA) lesion (OR 6.13, 95% CI 1.82-20.70, P = 0.004) and total ablation time (every 10 s increase: OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.14, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with >5000 rpm speed reduction. An ostial RCA lesion (OR 14.17, 95% CI 3.85-52.23, P < 0.001), use of intra-aortic balloon pump support (OR 4.19, 95% CI 1.18-14.87, P = 0.03), and systolic blood pressure just before RA (every 10 mmHg increase: OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.52, P = 0.03) were significantly associated with >10,000 rpm speed reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

RA of ostial RCA lesions was significantly associated with excessive speed reduction during RA, which implies that RA of ostial RCA lesions is technically more difficult than RA of non-ostial RCA lesions.

Is the SYNTAX Score II applicable in all percutaneous coronary intervention patients?

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the risk stratification value of the SYNTAX Score II (SS II) in consecutive PCI patients and to analyze whether the predictive ability of SS II was consistent in patients with complex and non-complex coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND

SS II was designed for patients with complex coronary artery disease and has been validated by a number of studies in such patients.

METHODS

The SS II for PCI was assessed in 10,072 consecutive patients who underwent PCI in Fuwai Hospital from January to December 2013. The patients were stratified according to SS II tertiles and divided into two subgroups: one-vessel or two-vessel disease (1 or 2VD) group (n = 5,709) and left main (LM) and/or three-vessel disease (3VD) group (n = 4,363). The endpoint was 30-month all-cause death following PCI procedure.

RESULTS

The high SS II group showed significantly higher 30-month mortality. Multivariate analyses showed that in the all-patients cohort and the two subgroups, SS II was an independent predictor of 30-month mortality (P < 0.0001). Based on receiver operating characteristic curves analysis, SS II showed moderate discrimination ability for 30-month mortality (C-statistics = 0.68, Hosmer-Lemeshow test P value >.05) and appeared to have better discrimination ability in the LM and/or 3VD subgroup (C-statistics = 0.631 vs. 0.722 for 1 or 2VD and LM and/or 3VD subgroups).

CONCLUSIONS

SS II was able to risk-stratify patients and predict 30-month mortality in all PCI patients. The discrimination ability of SS II appeared to be better in the LM and/or 3VD subgroup.

Use of the SYNTAX Score II to predict mortality in interventional cardiology: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

As the SYNTAX Score has limitations, it should be replaced by another better angiographic tool. By comparing mortality that was observed following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients who were allotted a low versus a high score, we aimed to systematically investigate mortality prediction using the SYNTAX Score II in Interventional Cardiology.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for relevant publications using the terms "SYNTAX Score II and percutaneous coronary intervention." The main outcome was all-cause mortality. This analysis was carried out by the RevMan 5.3 software [risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated].

RESULTS

A total number of 9443 participants were enrolled for this analysis. As different studies reported different range of SYNTAX Score II, we further classified these scores range into 4 different groups: 17 < SS > 17, 20 < SS > 20, 22 < SS > 22, and 26 < SS > 26 appropriately. Results of this analysis showed that the risk of mortality in patients with a high SYNTAX Score II (SS > 17) was significantly higher (RR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.05-6.73; P = .04) than patients with a low SYNTAX Score II (SS < 17). Even when participants with a low SYNTAX Score II (SS < 20) were compared with patients who were assigned to a higher SYNTAX Score II (SS > 20), a significantly higher risk of mortality was associated with a high SYNTAX Score II (RR: 3.73, 95% CI: 1.99 - 6.96; P = .0001).

CONCLUSION

Following PCI, the risk of mortality was higher in those patients with a high SYNTAX Score II. The SYNTAX Score II might be considered as an important tool to predict mortality in Interventional Cardiology. Future research should further explore the benefits of this tool.

Assessment of long-term mortality in patients with complex coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous intervention: comparison of multiple anatomical and clinical prognostic risk scores

AIMS

Three-vessel and left main coronary artery disease (CAD) have important prognostic implications. Consequently, numerous risk scores have been developed to stratify patients with complex CAD. The aim of the present study was to compare the predictive performance of six risk scores for occurrence of fouryear all-cause mortality.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From March 2008 to December 2012, 348 consecutive patients with complex CAD undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a tertiary centre in São Paulo, Brazil, were analysed. Four-year mortality was assessed. The scores compared were: baseline SYNTAX score (SS), residual SYNTAX score (rSS), ACEF score, clinical SYNTAX score (cSS), SYNTAX revascularisation index (SRI) and SYNTAX score II (SSII). SSII had the best predictive performance, AUC 0.82, Brier score 0.10, surpassing all the other scores for long-term mortality prediction. Moreover, SSII discriminated well PCI patients in risk groups with p<0.01 for four-year all-cause mortality. The ACEF score (AUC 0.77) and the cSS (AUC 0.78) were significantly better than the SS (AUC 0.65), SRI (AUC 0.60) or the rSS (AUC 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with complex CAD treated by PCI, the combination of baseline clinical and angiographic factors provided better risk assessment. The SSII demonstrated the most precise predictive performance for long-term mortality.

Long-term outcomes following left main bifurcation stenting in Indian population-Analysis based on SYNTAX I and II scores

Background

Syntax 1 and recently Syntax 2 (SS2) scores are validated risk prediction models in coronary disease.

Objectives

To find out the long term outcomes following stenting for unprotected left main bifurcation disease (LMD) and to validate and compare the performance of the SYNTAX scores 1 and 2 (SS1 and SS2 PCI) for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in Indian population.

Methods

Single-center, retrospective, observational study involving patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with at least one stent implanted for the LMD. Discrimination and calibration models were assessed by ROC curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

Results

Data of 103 patients were analyzed. The mean SS1 and SS2 scores were 27.9 and 30.7 and MACE was 16.5% at 4 years. The target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate at 4 years was 11(10.7%). There were 4 deaths (3.8%). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was the only variable in SS2, which predicted cardiac events. ROC curve analysis showed both models to be accurate in predicting TLR and mortality following LM PCI. SS2 score showed a better risk prediction than SSI with AUC for TLR (SSI 0.560 and SS2PCI 0.625) and AUC for mortality (SS1 0.674 and SS2PCI 0.833). Hosmer-Lemeshow test validated the accuracy of both the risk models in predicting the events.

Conclusions

Both risk models were applicable for Indian patients. The SS2 score was a better predictor for mortality and TLR. In the SS2 score, the LVEF was the most useful predictor of events after LM PCI.

Percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main stenoses - Procedural data and outcome depending on SYNTAX I Score

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that SYNTAX I score is a predictor for procedure complexity in left main PCI. Procedure complexity, duration and contrast load may contribute to adverse outcome of complex left main percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

In 105 consecutive patients who underwent PCI of unprotected left main coronary artery stenoses between 2014 and 2016, clinical parameters as well as PCI characteristics and follow-up data were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean SYNTAX I score was 29 ± 12, with 66 patients having a SYNTAX I score ≤ 32 and 39 patients a SYNTAX I score > 32. In patients with high SYNTAX I score vs. low-to-intermediate SYNTAX I score, single stent techniques were performed significantly less frequently (18% vs. 68%; p < 0.001), while Crush (44% vs. 5%; p < 0.001) and Culotte techniques (20% vs. 5%; p = 0.003) were performed significantly more frequently. Procedural success was achieved in all 105 cases without periprocedural mortality. During follow up, repeat PCI was necessary significantly more frequently in patients with high compared to patients with low-to-intermediate SYNTAX I score (34% vs.13%; p = 0.003). Nevertheless, overall mortality did not differ between patients with high vs. low-to-intermediate SYNTAX I score (20% vs. 18%).

CONCLUSIONS

PCI strategies for the treatment of left main coronary artery stenoses get significantly more complex with increasing SYNTAX I scores. While this translates into a significantly longer procedure duration and contrast load, short-term outcome seems not to be influenced by the SYNTAX I score.

Predictors of major adverse cardiac events following elective stenting of large coronary arteries

Objective

Diameter of the affected coronary artery is an important predictor of restenosis and need for revascularization. In the present study, we investigated the frequency and potential risk factors for major adverse cardiac events following elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and stenting of large coronary arteries.

Methods

We reviewed the data of elective candidates of PCI on a large coronary artery who presented to our center. Demographic, clinical, angiographic and follow-up data of the eligible patients were retrieved from our databank. The study characteristics were then compared between the patients with and without MACE in order to find out the probable risk factors for MACE in patients with large stent diameter.

Results

Data of 3043 patients who underwent single vessel elective PCI with a stent diameter of ≥3.5 mm was reviewed. During a median follow up period of 14 months, 64 (2.1%) patients had MACE. TVR was the most common type of MACE that was observed in 29 patients, while 5 patients had cardiac death. Higher serum levels of creatinine, history of cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and use of a drug eluting stent (DES) were significantly associated with MACE. In the multivariate model, history of CVA (odds ratio = 5.23, P = 0.030) and use of DES (odds ratio = 0.048, P = 0.011) were the independent predictors of MACE in patients underwent large coronary artery stenting.

Conclusion

This study showed that prior CVA and the use of BMS were the potential risk factors for MACE in patients who were stented on their large coronary arteries.

Accuracy of computed tomography for selecting the revascularization method based on SYNTAX score II

OBJECTIVES

The application of SYNTAX score II based on coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for selecting further treatment options has not been studied. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of CCTA combined with SYNTAX score II for selecting the revascularization method compared with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) based on 2014 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) guidelines.

METHODS

From January-May 2011, 160 patients who underwent both CCTA and ICA within 30 interval days were included. The diagnostic performance of CCTA, CCTA plus CT-SYNTAX score I and CT-SYNTAX score II was analysed using ICA counterparts as references.

RESULTS

Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of CCTA plus CT-SYNTAX I for selecting coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) candidates using ICA plus ICA-SYNTAX I as reference, were 70.6 %, 95.8 %, 66.7 %, 96.5 % and 93.1 %, respectively. The diagnostic performance of CCTA plus CT-SYNTAX II showed improvement with values of 83.3 %, 97.3 %, 71.4 %, 98.6 % and 96.3 %, respectively, using ICA plus ICA-SYNTAX II as reference.

CONCLUSIONS

CCTA combined with CT-SYNTAX score II is an accurate method for selecting CABG surgery candidates compared with ICA-SYNTAX score II.

KEY POINTS

• SYNTAX plus CCTA can be highly specific for selecting the revascularization method. • SYNTAX II was complemented by including clinical considerations to SYNTAX I. • CCTA plus CT-SYNTAX II is an accurate method for selecting CABG candidates.

The Value of the SYNTAX Score II in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The predictive value of the SYNTAX score (SS) for clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is very limited and could potentially be improved by the combination of anatomic and clinical variables, the SS-II. We aimed to evaluate the value of the SS-II in predicting outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI.

METHODS

A total of 402 patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral TAVI were included. Preprocedural TAVI angiograms were reviewed and the SS-I and SS-II were calculated using the SS algorithms. Patients were stratified in 3 groups according to SS-II tertiles. The coprimary endpoints were all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, cerebrovascular event, or myocardial infarction at 1 year.

RESULTS

Increased SS-II was associated with higher 30-day mortality (P=.036) and major bleeding (P=.015). The 1-year risk of death and MACE was higher among patients in the 3rd SS-II tertile (HR, 2.60; P=.002 and HR, 2.66; P<.001) and was similar among patients in the 2nd tertile (HR, 1.27; P=.507 and HR, 1.05; P=.895) compared with patients in the 1st tertile. The highest SS-II tertile was an independent predictor of long-term mortality (P=.046) and MACE (P=.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The SS-II seems more suited to predict clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI than the SS-I. Increased SS-II was associated with poorer clinical outcomes at 1 and 4 years post-TAVI, independently of the presence of coronary artery disease.

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Arterial Conduits in the Elderly

Although improved long-term outcomes obtained with the use of arterial grafts for coronary revascularization in comparison with the traditional association of a single arterial and saphenous vein grafts have been demonstrated in the overall population, the efficacy of this newer technique in the elderly is difficult to prove because their shorter life expectancy due to advanced heart disease, associated with severe comorbidities. Moreover, more widespread use of this technique is limited by the concerns on the potential morbidity, particularly the longer time required to perform the operation and the possibility of deep sternal wound infection in case of bilateral internal thoracic artery harvesting due to the decreased blood supply to the sternum and surrounding tissues.The review of the recent literature indicates that the use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries in very elderly patients should not be considered routinely. It seems reasonable to avoid it in octogenarians in the presence of well-known predictors of sternal complications such as diabetes, morbid obesity, and severe chronic lung disease.There is also still controversy about the superiority of the radial artery over the saphenous vein graft as a second or third conduit for surgical myocardial revascularization, although the majority of recent studies seem to support more liberal use of the radial artery as second arterial conduit in the elderly. Although a clinical benefit of arterial graft revascularization cannot be formally excluded for elderly patients, the increased complexity of this technique suggests that careful clinical judgment is necessary to select grafts for individual patients.

Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients With Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate long-term clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with unprotected left main disease (ULMD).

BACKGROUND

PCI has been increasingly used as an alternative mode of revascularization for ULMD. However, there are limited data comparing clinical outcomes between CABG surgery and PCI.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2010, 4,046 consecutive patients with ULMD were treated with either CABG surgery (n = 2,604) or PCI (n = 1,442) with drug-eluting stents. The primary outcome was 3-year all-cause mortality and the secondary outcome was the composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke.

RESULTS

The unadjusted 3-year all-cause mortality was higher in the PCI group as compared with the CABG group (3.8% vs. 2.5%; log-rank p = 0.03), although there was no significant difference in the composite outcome (7.5% vs. 9.4%; log-rank p = 0.07). After adjustment for differences in baseline risk factors, PCI was associated with significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32 to 2.21; p < 0.001) but similar risk of the composite outcome (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.09; p = 0.43). These differences were not statistically significant among patients with low or intermediate SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score (≤32) or diabetes; however, PCI was associated with an increased risk among those with high SYNTAX score (>32), with HRs of 3.10 (95% CI: 1.84 to 5.22; p < 0.001) for all-cause mortality and 1.82 (95% CI: 1.36 to 2.45; p < 0.001) for the composite outcome. CABG was associated with lower risk of repeat revascularization but higher risk of stroke in each clinically relevant subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-center observational study among patients with ULMD, CABG was associated with improved long-term outcomes, especially in patients with more complex disease.