Transcatheter heart valve migration and embolization: rare and preventable?

TAV-in-TAV in patients with prosthesis embolization: Impact of commissural alignment and global outcomes

BACKGROUND

Optimal strategies to manage embolization of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) devices are unclear; valve-in-valve (ViV) is often used. We aimed to describe through one-single center experience its rate, causes, consequences, and management as well as the rate and relevance of commissural alignment (CA) in this context.

METHODS

We identified across 1038 TAVI cases, those cases requiring ViV for the management of first device embolization. CA (absence or mild misalignment) after first and second device was assessed by CT or fluoroscopy.

RESULTS

A total of 23 cases (2.2%) were identified, 52.3% embolized towards the aorta and 47.7% towards the ventricle. Suboptimal implant height (38%) and embolization at the time of post-dilation (23%) were the most frequent mechanisms together with greater rate of bicuspid valve (p < 0.001) and a trend to greater annular eccentricity. Procedural and 1-year death occurred in 13% and 34%, respectively (vs. 1.1% and 7.8% in the global cohort, p < 0.001). CA was present in 76.9% of the prostheses initially implanted but was only spontaneously achieved in 30.8% of the second ViV device. Adequate CA of both prostheses was identified in only two cases (8.7%). There were no cases of coronary obstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

TAVI device embolization mechanisms can often be predicted and prevented. Mortality following bail-out ViV is higher than in regular TAVI procedures but 2/3 of these patients survived beyond 1-year follow-up. In them, valve degeneration or coronary re-access might be particularly challenging since CA was rarely achieved with both devices suggesting that greater efforts should be made in this regard.

Valve-in-valve as a rescue treatment in retrograde migration of the transcatheter aortic valve to the left ventricle: a case report

Background

The treatment of choice for patients with severe symptomatic pure native aortic valve regurgitation (PNAVR) is surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). However, not all patients are candidates for surgery because of comorbidities or are deemed high risk for surgery. In such cases, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has proved to be better than medical treatment.

Case summary

A 78-year-old male with a history of ankylosing spondylitis was admitted with New York Heart Association III heart failure. The echocardiogram showed severe aortic regurgitation and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 52%. Because of high surgical risk and being refractory to medical RX, he was accepted for TAVR. The tomography of anatomical characteristics reported the absence of calcium and dilation of the aortic ring and aortic root. During the TAVR procedure, the patient experienced valve migration, but it was autonomously repositioned in the aortic annulus. As a rescue measure, a second valve was placed. Here, we present a case of valve migration to the left ventricle treated with a valve-in-valve procedure without the need for surgical treatment.

Discussion

The absence of annulus calcification in PNAVR increases the risk of post-TAVR paravalvular leak and device embolization. Valve migration generally requires valve recovery and conversion to SAVR.

Anatomic predictor of severe prosthesis malposition following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self- expandable Venus-A Valve among pure aortic regurgitation: A multicenter retrospective study

Background

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in the treatment of patients with pure native aortic valve regurgitation (NAVR) has been based on the "off-label" indications, while the absence of aortic valve calcification and difficulty in anchoring was found to significantly increase the risk of prosthesis malposition. The aim of this study was to explore the anatomical predictors of severe prosthesis malposition following TAVR with the self-expandable Venus-A Valve among patients with NAVR.

Methods

A total of 62 patients with NAVR who underwent TAVR with Venus-A Valve at four Chinese clinical centers were retrospectively observed. The clinical features, aortic multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) data, and clinical outcomes were compared between non-/mild malposition and severe malposition groups. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors of severe prosthesis malposition, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to explore the predictive value of the risk factors.

Results

Valve migration to ascending aortic direction occurred in 1 patient, and the remaining 61 patients (including 19 severe malposition cases and 42 non-/mild malposition cases) were included in the analysis. The diameter and height of the sinotubular junction (STJ) and STJ cover index (STJCI, calculated as 100%*STJ diameter/nominal prosthesis crown diameter) were all greater in the severe malposition group (all p < 0.05). Logistic regression showed that STJ diameter (OR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.04-1.47, p = 0.017), STJ height (OR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.47, p = 0.017), and STJCI (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.16, p = 0.032) were potential predictors for severe prosthesis malposition. The area under the ROC curve was 0.72 (95% CI 0.58-0.85, p = 0.008) for STJ diameter, 0.70 (95% CI 0.55-0.86, p = 0.012) for STJ height, and 0.69 (95% CI 0.55-0.83, p = 0.017) for STJCI, respectively. The cutoff value was 33.2 mm for STJ diameter (sensitivity was 84.2% and specificity was 65.8%), 24.1 mm for STJ height (sensitivity was 57.9% and specificity was 87.8%), and 81.0% for STJCI (sensitivity was 68.4% and specificity was 68.3%), respectively.

Conclusion

Larger and higher STJ, as well as greater STJ to valve crown diameter ratio, may help identify patients at high risk for severe prosthesis malposition among patients with NAVR undergoing TAVR with Venus-A prosthesis valve.

Migration despite stabilization of an embolized transcatheter heart valve: A word of caution

This case report describes an initially stabilized transcatheter heart valve that embolized in the ascending aorta, leading to a postprocedural acute type A aortic dissection.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in the Descending Aorta: History Revisited!

An elderly patient with significant aortic regurgitation presented with heart failure. Dilation of the aortic root precluded a transcatheter anatomic site valve implantation, and prohibitive operative risk ruled against surgical implantation. A bail-out transcatheter implantation of the aortic valve in the descending aorta was successfully carried out with satisfactory outcomes.

Mitral Valve Replacement: A Review of Current Practices and Considerations in Low and High-Risk Patients

Mitral Regurgitation (MR) is the most common form of severe valvular disease occurring in developed countries, being caused either primarily on its own or secondary to cardiac disease. Surgical intervention is required for the correction of MR, which could include the replacement or repair of the affected valve. Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement (TMVR) in selected patients is of increasing importance, especially after the success of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). TMVR can be divided into three types i.e., valve-in-valve (ViV) for severe mitral valve disease, valve-in-ring (ViR) for failed surgical repairs, and valve-in-mitral annular calcifications (ViMAC) for mitral valvular disease with severe mitral annular calcifications and poor surgical criteria. The FDA approved Mitral ViV for patients with a high surgical risk in 2017, while ViR and ViMAC are still currently under consideration. The SAPIEN M3 valve is relatively new with a trans-septal system, with a success rate of 86%, and no mortality in a 30-day outcome. The Cardiovalve is a bovine pericardium device that has a dual nitinol frame with a custom surgical design to facilitate TMVR. The AHEAD trial will evaluate whether the device is safe to use in a clinical setting and how effective it is for reducing MR in these patients. The trial consists of 30 patients in which the first 5 patients showed 100% technical success and a reduction of MR. This evolution of modern medicine has assisted in many different countries, including Pakistan where there is a higher prevalence of MR and hence, a greater need to apply TMVR in clinical practice.

Development of atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction disturbances in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with new generation self-expanding valves: A real world multicenter analysis

BACKGROUND

High degree cardiac conduction disturbances (HDCD) remain a major complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), especially with self-expandable valves (SEV). Our aim was to investigate peri-procedural and in-hospital modification of atrioventricular and intracardiac conduction associated to new generation SEV implantation, and the development of new HDCD resulting in permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM) in patients undergoing TAVR.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Three-hundred forty-four consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR with a new generation SEV [Evolut-R/Pro (n = 130), Acurate-neo (n = 79), Portico (n = 75) and Allegra (n = 60)] were included. An analysis of baseline, post-TAVR and pre-discharge ECG and procedural aspects were centrally performed. A significant increase in baseline PR interval (169.6 ± 28.2 ms) and QRS complex width (101.7 ± 25.9 ms) was noted immediately post-TAVR (188.04 ± 34.49; 129.55 ± 30.02 ms), with a partial in-hospital reversal (179.4 ± 30.1; 123.06 ± 30.94 ms), resulting in a net increase at hospital discharge of 12.6 ± 38.8 ms and 21.4 ± 31.6 ms (p < 0.001), respectively. The global incidence of new onset persistent HDCD at hospital discharge was 46.3%, with 17.7% of patients requiring PPM. Independent predictors of new onset HCDC at hospital discharge were valve recapture (OR: 2.8; 95% IC: 1.1-7.2, p = 0.033) and implantation depth ≥ 6 mm (OR: 1.9 05% IC 1.1-3.3, p = 0.015), while higher implantation (<3 mm (OR: 0.3, 95% IC 0.1-0.7, p = 0.014) and use of Acurate-Neo valve (OR: 0.4; 95% IC 0.2-0.8, p = 0.009) were protective factor.

CONCLUSIONS

New generation self-expanding aortic valves were associated with a significant increase in PR and QRS interval at hospital discharge leading to a very high rate of HDCD. While valve recapture and implantation depth were independent predictors for the occurrence of HDCD, use of Accurate-Neo valve was a protective factor.

Migration and surgical retrieval of transcatheter aortic valve

Migration of transcatheter aortic valve can occur during or after the deployment of the valve. We report a case of the migrated transcatheter aortic valve that required surgical intervention for its removal. The case highlights the importance of the availability of a cardiac surgical team and cardiopulmonary bypass machine when the percutaneous technique of retrieval is not feasible.

Strategies for Recovering an Embolized Percutaneous Device

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Device embolization is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of transcatheter structural heart interventions and may require prompt intervention. The present work aims to provide an overview of strategies for device retrievals in order to better guide the evaluation and management of device embolization.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the evolution of transcatheter device therapies has had a tremendous impact on the management in structural heart disease, availability of various retrieval devices, knowledge in how to use them, and multidisciplinary collaboration are key for successful device retrieval. Understanding the reasons for embolization, strategies to avoid embolization, and the techniques for retrieval of devices used in structural heart disease should be appreciated by the treating physician.

Current Devices and Complications Related to Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: The Bumpy Road to the Top

Mitral regurgitation is the most common valvular lesion in the developed world, with increasing prevalence, morbidity, and mortality. The experience with surgical mitral valve repair or replacement is very well-validated. However, more than 45% of these patients get denied surgery due to an elevated risk profile and advanced disease of the left ventricle at the time of presentation, promoting the need for less invasive transcatheter options such as transcatheter repair and transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR). Early available TMVR studies have shown promising results, and several dedicated devices are under clinical evaluation. However, TMVR is still in the early developmental stages and is associated with a non-negligible risk of periprocedural and post-procedural complications. In this review, we discuss the current challenges facing TMVR and the potential TMVR-related complications, offering an overview on the measures implemented to mitigate these complications, and future implications.

Surgical challenges in retrieval of an embolized transcatheter valve from the aorta

Embolization of a transcatheter aortic valve is a rare complication. Surgery is required if percutaneous retrieval is not possible. We present a case of embolization of an evolut R device (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) into the ascending aorta. This device due to its taller profile presents unique surgical challenges in retrieval with respect to arterial access and cross clamping of the aorta. Prior knowledge of the profile of the various devices is critical in order to ensure a safe retrieval and smooth conduct of the operation.