Combined aerobic/resistance/inspiratory muscle training as the 'optimum' exercise programme for patients with chronic heart failure: ARISTOS-HF randomized clinical trial

Impact of Different Exercise Modalities on Physical Function and Quality of Life in Patients with Heart Failure

Heart failure, a chronic condition, often manifests with reduced physical function and an overall decline in quality of life. It is considered critical that patients with heart failure recover as soon as possible; exercise training, which includes aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, inspiratory muscle training, traditional mind-body exercise, and combined training, facilitates this. The research progress on the impact of various exercise modalities on the physical function and quality of life of patients with heart failure is systematically reviewed in this article. The objective is to augment the understanding of healthcare personnel regarding the status of implementation and outcomes associated with varied exercise modalities. This endeavor seeks to provide a point of reference for the development of exercise rehabilitation programs tailored to individuals contending with heart failure.

Supervised exercise training in patients with advanced heart failure and left ventricular assist device: A multicentre randomized controlled trial (Ex-VAD trial)

AIMS

Small studies and observations suggested that exercise training may improve peak oxygen consumption (peakVO2 ) in patients with advanced heart failure and left ventricular assist device (LVAD). We investigated whether in this patient group a supervised exercise training can improve exercise capacity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this multicentre, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, patients with stable heart failure and LVAD were randomly assigned (2:1) to 12 weeks of supervised exercise training or usual care, with 12 weeks of follow-up. The primary endpoint was the change in peakVO2 after 12 weeks (51 patients provided a power of 90% with an expected group difference in peakVO2 of 3 ml/kg/min). Secondary endpoints included changes in submaximal exercise capacity and quality of life. Among 64 patients enrolled (97% male, mean age 56 years), 54 were included in the analysis. Mean difference in the change of peakVO2 after 12 weeks was 0.826 ml/min/kg (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.37, 2.03; p = 0.183). There was a positive effect of exercise training on 6-min walk distance with a mean increase in the intervention group by 43.4 m (95% CI 16.9, 69.9; p = 0.0024), and on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire physical domain score (mean 14.3, 95% CI 3.7, 24.9; p = 0.0124), both after 12 weeks. The overall adherence was high (71%), and there were no differences in adverse events between groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with advanced heart failure and LVAD, 12 weeks of exercise training did not improve peakVO2 but demonstrated positive effects on submaximal exercise capacity and physical quality of life.

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation associated with aerobic exercise on the functional and physical capacity of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: ELETRIC study protocol

BACKGROUND

The hallmark symptom of heart failure (HF) is severe exercise intolerance. Fortunately, accumulated evidence suggests that exercise programs improve physical performance, enhance autonomy in daily activities and quality of life, and reduce cardiovascular and other hospitalizations. Recently, experimental studies have explored the application of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, especially transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), aiming to improve physical performance due to its ability to modulate brain functioning. The primary objective of the present study is to evaluate the effects of anodal tDCS associated with aerobic exercise on the functional capacity of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Secondary objectives are to compare the effects of tDCS associated with aerobic exercise vs. sham-tDCS associated with aerobic exercise on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity; inflammatory cytokines; and quality of life.

METHODS

This is a two-arm, prospectively registered, randomized trial with concealed allocation, double-blind, and intention-to-treat analysis. Forty-four patients with HFrEF will be recruited. The experimental group will undertake 25-30 min aerobic exercise training associated with tDCS, for 4 weeks. The control group will undergo the same aerobic exercise training, but with sham-tDCS. The primary outcome will be functional performance by the 6-min walk test. Secondary outcomes will include cardiopulmonary exercise capacity, inflammatory cytokines, and quality of life. Outcomes will be collected by a researcher blinded to group allocation at baseline (T0) and after 4 weeks of intervention (T1).

DISCUSSION

Although previous studies have investigated the combined effect of tDCS on T3 area and physical performance and have suggested that tDCS could have reduced ratings of perceived exertion by affecting the activity of the insular cortex, and therefore increase exercise tolerance, this study is the first to evaluate the effects of the addition of anodal tDCS to aerobic exercise training for improving physical and functional performance, decreasing the perceived exertion, altering the quantification of inflammatory cytokines, and improving the subclinical values of the cardiopulmonary test in patients with HFrEF, which could result in an important advance in cardiac rehabilitation for patients with chronic HF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC) RBR-10w787j6. Registered on 25 April 2023. https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/pesquisador.

Standardised Exercise Prescription for Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome and/or Heart Failure: A Consensus Statement from the EXPERT Working Group

Whereas exercise training, as part of multidisciplinary rehabilitation, is a key component in the management of patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and/or congestive heart failure (CHF), physicians and exercise professionals disagree among themselves on the type and characteristics of the exercise to be prescribed to these patients, and the exercise prescriptions are not consistent with the international guidelines. This impacts the efficacy and quality of the intervention of rehabilitation. To overcome these barriers, a digital training and decision support system [i.e. EXercise Prescription in Everyday practice & Rehabilitative Training (EXPERT) tool], i.e. a stepwise aid to exercise prescription in patients with CCS and/or CHF, affected by concomitant risk factors and comorbidities, in the setting of multidisciplinary rehabilitation, was developed. The EXPERT working group members reviewed the literature and formulated exercise recommendations (exercise training intensity, frequency, volume, type, session and programme duration) and safety precautions for CCS and/or CHF (including heart transplantation). Also, highly prevalent comorbidities (e.g. peripheral arterial disease) or cardiac devices (e.g. pacemaker, implanted cardioverter defibrillator, left-ventricular assist device) were considered, as well as indications for the in-hospital phase (e.g. after coronary revascularisation or hospitalisation for CHF). The contributions of physical fitness, medications and adverse events during exercise testing were also considered. The EXPERT tool was developed on the basis of this evidence. In this paper, the exercise prescriptions for patients with CCS and/or CHF formulated for the EXPERT tool are presented. Finally, to demonstrate how the EXPERT tool proposes exercise prescriptions in patients with CCS and/or CHF with different combinations of CVD risk factors, three patient cases with solutions are presented.

Locomotor and respiratory muscle abnormalities in HFrEF and HFpEF

Heart failure (HF) is a chronic and progressive syndrome affecting worldwide billions of patients. Exercise intolerance and early fatigue are hallmarks of HF patients either with a reduced (HFrEF) or a preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction. Alterations of the skeletal muscle contribute to exercise intolerance in HF. This review will provide a contemporary summary of the clinical and molecular alterations currently known to occur in the skeletal muscles of both HFrEF and HFpEF, and thereby differentiate the effects on locomotor and respiratory muscles, in particular the diaphragm. Moreover, current and future therapeutic options to address skeletal muscle weakness will be discussed focusing mainly on the effects of exercise training.

Effectiveness of a training program for a patient with non-cardiac chest pain that combines intervention to improve quality of life, psychological state, and functional capacity: a case report

BACKGROUND

Noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) is persistent angina-like chest pain without cardiac origin that affects the patient's health related quality of life (HrQoL), although it does not affect mortality. The effect of a comprehensive training program for NCCP focused on quality of life, psychological state, peripheral muscle strength, physical activity, and quality of life has not been previously established or published. Therefore, this study aimed to show the effectiveness of our combined training program that focuses on functional capacity, physical activity, pulmonary function, respiratory and peripheral muscle strength, dyspnea, fatigue, anxiety, and depression perception in NCCP patients with dyspnea.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 38-year-old man with shortness of breath and NCCP was referred to to us for cardiopulmonary rehabilitation. Respiratory muscle strength (mouth pressure device), functional capacity (6 min walking test, 6-MWT), peripheral muscle strength (dynamometer), pulmonary function (spirometry), fatigue (fatigue severity scale), shortness of breath (MMRC, Modified Medical Council Research, Modified Borg Scale-MBS), physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire, IPAQ), health related quality of life (SF-36, Short Form-36), and depression and anxiety (Hospital Depression and Anxiety scale, HADs) were assessed. Aerobic training combined with inspiratory muscle training (loading 30% maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP)) was administered at least 5 days/week for 6 weeks. Functional capacity, physical activity, pulmonary function, and respiratory and peripheral muscle strength improved, and dyspnea, fatigue, anxiety, and depression perception were decreased after the management.

CONCLUSIONS

This combined training program was effective for patients with NCCP and shortness of breath. Future studies should be conducted to find the most effective biopsychosocial training protocol for NCCP patients.

Effects of different exercise modalities on inhibiting left ventricular pathological remodeling in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

AIMS

To evaluate the effects of different exercise training modalities on inhibiting the left ventricular pathological remodeling in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and screen out the optimal exercise modality.

METHODS

We performed a network meta-analysis based on the Frequentist model. Random-effect meta-analyses were used to estimate mean differences (MD) and 95 % confidence intervals.

KEY FINDINGS

25 randomized controlled trials (1284 patients) were enrolled in this study. Results revealed that: high-intensity interval training had the best effect in improving left ventricular ejection fraction (p-score = 0.93, MD: 6.44 (3.61 to 9.28)), reducing left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (p-score = 0.97, MD: -6.73 (-10.27 to -3.19)) and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (p-score = 0.97, MD: -9.33 (-14.90 to -3.76)). Combined aerobic training with resistance training and inspiratory muscle training had the best effect in improving maximal oxygen consumption (p-score = 0.90, MD: 5.19 (3.12 to 7.25)).

SIGNIFICANCE

Current evidence revealed that exercise training could effectively inhibit left ventricular pathological remodeling in patients with HFrEF. For efficacy, high-intensity interval training may have greater potential.

The importance of re-evaluating the risk score in heart failure patients: An analysis from the Metabolic Exercise Cardiac Kidney Indexes (MECKI) score database

BACKGROUND

The role of risk scores in heart failure (HF) management has been highlighted by international guidelines. In contrast with HF, which is intrinsically a dynamic and unstable syndrome, all its prognostic studies have been based on a single evaluation. We investigated whether time-related changes of a well-recognized risk score, the MECKI score, added prognostic value. MECKI score is based on peak VO₂, VE/VCO₂ slope, Na⁺, LVEF, MDRD and Hb.

METHODS

A multi-centre retrospective study was conducted involving 660 patients who performed MECKI re-evaluation at least 6 months apart. Based on the difference between II and I evaluation of MECKI values (MECKI II - MECKI I = ∆ MECKI) the study population was divided in 2 groups: those presenting a score reduction (∆ MECKI <0, i.e. clinical improvement), vs. patients presenting an increase (∆ MECKI >0, clinical deterioration).

RESULTS

The prognostic value of MECKI score is confirmed also when re-assessed during follow-up. The group with improved MECKI (366 patients) showed a better prognosis compared to patients with worsened MECKI (294 patients) (p < 0.0001). At 1st evaluation, the two groups differentiated by LVEF, V_E/VCO₂ slope and blood Na⁺ concentration, while at 2nd evaluation they differentiated in all 6 parameters considered in the score. The patients who improved MECKI score, improved in all components of the score but hemoglobin, while patients who worsened the score, worsened all parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that re-assessment of MECKI score identifies HF subjects at higher risk and that score improvement or deterioration regards several MECKI score generating parameters confirming the holistic background of HF.

Current role and future perspectives of cardiac rehabilitation in coronary heart disease

Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. While there have been major advances in this field, these patients are still a higher risk subgroup. As such, strategies to mitigate risk and tailor secondary prevention measures are of the utmost relevance. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR), encompassing several domains including exercise training, cardiovascular risk factor optimization, nutritional and psychological assessments, as well as other ancillary interventions has shown to be one of the pillars in the contemporary management of patients with IHD. Indeed, CR is associated with several benefits in this population, ranging from functional capacity to improvements in outcomes. Whilst this, there are still several issues concerning the optimal application of CR which are still not fully ascertained, such as lack of referral and completion, as well as questions related to programme design (particularly among patients with multiple comorbidities). In this review, we aim at presenting a pragmatic overview on the current role of CR in the management of individuals with IHD, while also discussing some of the caveats in the current data, as well as future concepts which could help improve the uptake and personalization of this pivotal time-tested intervention.