Current role and future perspectives of cardiac rehabilitation in coronary heart disease

Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. While there have been major advances in this field, these patients are still a higher risk subgroup. As such, strategies to mitigate risk and tailor secondary prevention measures are of the utmost relevance. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR), encompassing several domains including exercise training, cardiovascular risk factor optimization, nutritional and psychological assessments, as well as other ancillary interventions has shown to be one of the pillars in the contemporary management of patients with IHD. Indeed, CR is associated with several benefits in this population, ranging from functional capacity to improvements in outcomes. Whilst this, there are still several issues concerning the optimal application of CR which are still not fully ascertained, such as lack of referral and completion, as well as questions related to programme design (particularly among patients with multiple comorbidities). In this review, we aim at presenting a pragmatic overview on the current role of CR in the management of individuals with IHD, while also discussing some of the caveats in the current data, as well as future concepts which could help improve the uptake and personalization of this pivotal time-tested intervention.

Differential impact of a cardiac rehabilitation program in functional parameters according to patient gender

INTRODUCTION

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (EBCR) programs are of paramount importance in the management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) survivors. Albeit this, female patients tend to be less referred for these programs, while also having a poorer prognosis. We aimed at assessing the impact of a contemporary EBCR program on functional parameters after an AMI, and specifically the impact of gender on its potential benefits.

METHODS

Observational, retrospective cohort study including all patients admitted to a tertiary center due to an AMI who completed a phase II EBCR program after discharge, between November 2012 and April 2017. Functional parameters were assessed by a symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). Patients were dichotomized according to gender.

RESULTS

A total of 379 patients were included, 19% of whom were women. After the program, peak oxygen uptake (pVO2) and exercise duration increased significantly (P<0.001). Though female patients presented a lower pVO2 and completed a shorter CPET at both the beginning and end of the study, there were no differences in the magnitude of improvement in these parameters between both groups [pVO2 delta 1.37 ± 3.08 vs 1.31 ± 2.62 mL/kg/min, P=0.876; CPET duration delta 120 (60-167) vs 85 (60-146), P=0.176].

CONCLUSIONS

A contemporary EBCR program was associated with significant improvements in functional parameters, as assessed by CPET. Though female patients had lower levels of pVO2, the benefits of this program were similar among groups. These results highlight the importance of EBCR among this higher risk subset of patients.