Ventricular scar channel entrances identified by new wideband cardiac magnetic resonance sequence to guide ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with cardiac defibrillators

Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Imaging in Patients With Implantable Cardiac Devices: Challenges, Techniques, and Clinical Applications

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with cardiac implants, such as pacemakers and defibrillators, has gained importance in recent years with the development of modern cardiac implantable electronic devices. The increasing clinical need to perform MRI examinations in patients with cardiac implants has driven the development of new advanced MRI sequences to mitigate image artifacts associated with cardiac implants. More specifically, advances in imaging techniques, such as wideband late gadolinium enhancement imaging, wideband T1 mapping, and wideband perfusion, have been designed to improve image quality and examinations in patients with cardiac implants, enabling a comprehensive and more reliable diagnosis, which was previously unattainable in these patients. This review article explores recent developments and applications of wideband techniques in the field of cardiovascular MRI, offering insights into their transformative potential. Clinical applications of wideband cardiovascular MRI are highlighted, particularly in assessing myocardial viability, guiding ventricular tachycardia ablation, and characterizing myocardial tissue.

Personalized voltage maps guided by cardiac magnetic resonance in the era of high-density mapping

BACKGROUND

Voltage mapping could identify the conducting channels potentially responsible for ventricular tachycardia (VT). Standard thresholds (0.5-1.5 mV) were established using bipolar catheters. No thresholds have been analyzed with high-density mapping catheters. In addition, channels identified by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has been proven to be related with VT.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the diagnostic yield of a personalized voltage map using CMR to guide the adjustment of voltage thresholds.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with scar-related VT undergoing ablation after CMR (from October 2018 to December 2020) were included. First, personalized CMR-guided voltage thresholds were defined systematically according to the distribution of the scar and channels. Second, to validate these new thresholds, a comparison with standard thresholds (0.5-1.5 mV) was performed. Tissue characteristics of areas identified as deceleration zones (DZs) were recorded for each pair of thresholds. In addition, the relation of VT circuits with voltage channels was analyzed for both maps.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were included [mean age 66.6 ± 11.2 years; 25 (78.1%) ischemic cardiomyopathy]. Overall, 52 DZs were observed: 44.2% were identified as border zone tissue with standard cutoffs vs 75.0% using personalized voltage thresholds (P = .003). Of the 31 VT isthmuses detected, only 35.5% correlated with a voltage channel with standard thresholds vs 74.2% using adjusted thresholds (P = .005). Adjusted cutoff bipolar voltages that better matched CMR images were 0.51 ± 0.32 and 1.79 ± 0.71 mV with high interindividual variability (from 0.14-1.68 to 0.7-3.21 mV).

CONCLUSION

Personalized voltage CMR-guided personalized voltage maps enable a better identification of the substrate with a higher correlation with both DZs and VT isthmuses than do conventional voltage maps using fixed thresholds.

Substrate Mapping for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Through High-Density Whole-Chamber Double Extra Stimuli: The S3 Protocol

BACKGROUND

A partial delineation of targets for ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) during a stable rhythm is likely responsible for a suboptimal success rate. The abnormal low-voltage near-field functional components may be hidden within the high-amplitude far-field signal.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit and feasibility of functional substrate mapping using a full-ventricle S3 protocol and to assess its colocalization with arrhythmogenic conducting channels (CCs) on late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance.

METHODS

An S3 mapping protocol with a drive train of S1 followed by S2 (effective refractory period + 30 ms) and S3 (effective refractory period + 50 ms) from the right ventricular apex was performed in 40 consecutive patients undergoing scar-related VT ablation. Deceleration zones (DZs) and areas of late potentials (LPs) were identified for all maps. A preprocedural noninvasive substrate assessment was done using late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance and postprocessing with automated CC identification.

RESULTS

The S3 protocol was completed in 34 of the 40 procedures (85.0%). The S3 protocol enhanced the identification of VT isthmus on the basis of DZ (89% vs 62%; P < 0.01) and LP (93% vs 78%; P = 0.04) assessment. The percentage of CCs unmasked by DZs and LPs using S3 maps was significantly higher than the ones using S2 and S1 maps (78%, 65%, and 48% [P < 0.001] and 88%, 81%, and 68% [P < 0.01], respectively). The functional substrate identified during S3 activation mapping was significantly more extensive than the one identified using S2 and S1, including a greater number of DZs (2.94, 2.47, and 1.82, respectively; P < 0.001) and a wider area of LPs (44.1, 38.2, and 29.4 cm2, respectively; P < 0.001). After VT ablation, 77.9% of patients have been VT free during a median follow-up period of 13.6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The S3 protocol was feasible in 85% of patients, allows a better identification of targets for ablation, and might improve VT ablation results.

Pre- and post-procedural cardiac imaging (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) in electrophysiology: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging of the European Society of Cardiology

Imaging using cardiac computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has become an important option for anatomic and substrate delineation in complex atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation procedures. Computed tomography more common than MR has been used to detect procedure-associated complications such as oesophageal, cerebral, and vascular injury. This clinical consensus statement summarizes the current knowledge of CT and MR to facilitate electrophysiological procedures, the current value of real-time integration of imaging-derived anatomy, and substrate information during the procedure and the current role of CT and MR in diagnosing relevant procedure-related complications. Practical advice on potential advantages of one imaging modality over the other is discussed for patients with implanted cardiac rhythm devices as well as for planning, intraprocedural integration, and post-interventional management in AF and VT ablation patients. Establishing a team of electrophysiologists and cardiac imaging specialists working on specific details of imaging for complex ablation procedures is key. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can safely be performed in most patients with implanted active cardiac devices. Standard procedures for pre- and post-scanning management of the device and potential CMR-associated device malfunctions need to be in place. In VT patients, imaging-specifically MR-may help to determine scar location and mural distribution in patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy beyond evaluating the underlying structural heart disease. Future directions in imaging may include the ability to register multiple imaging modalities and novel high-resolution modalities, but also refinements of imaging-guided ablation strategies are expected.

Non-invasive detection of slow conduction with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for ventricular tachycardia ablation

AIMS

Non-invasive myocardial scar characterization with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has been shown to accurately identify conduction channels and can be an important aid for ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. A new mapping method based on targeting deceleration zones (DZs) has become one of the most commonly used strategies for VT ablation procedures. The aim of the study was to analyse the capability of CMR to identify DZs and to find predictors of arrhythmogenicity in CMR channels.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-four consecutive patients with structural heart disease and VT undergoing ablation after CMR at a single centre (October 2018 to July 2021) were included (mean age, 64.8 ± 11.6 years; 95.5% male; 70.5% with ischaemic heart disease; a mean ejection fraction of 32.3 ± 7.8%). The characteristics of CMR channels were analysed, and correlations with DZs detected during isochronal late activation mapping in both baseline maps and remaps were determined. Overall, 109 automatically detected CMR channels were analysed (2.48 ± 1.15 per patient; length, 57.91 ± 63.07 mm; conducting channel mass, 2.06 ± 2.67 g; protectedness, 21.44 ± 25.39 mm). Overall, 76.1% of CMR channels were associated with a DZ. A univariate analysis showed that channels associated with DZs were longer [67.81 ± 68.45 vs. 26.31 ± 21.25 mm, odds ratio (OR) 1.03, P = 0.010], with a higher border zone (BZ) mass (2.41 ± 2.91 vs. 0.87 ± 0.86 g, OR 2.46, P = 0.011) and greater protectedness (24.97 ± 27.72 vs. 10.19 ± 9.52 mm, OR 1.08, P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Non-invasive detection of targets for VT ablation is possible with CMR. Deceleration zones found during electroanatomical mapping accurately correlate with CMR channels, especially those with increased length, BZ mass, and protectedness.

Management of ventricular tachycardias: insights on centre settings, procedural workflow, endpoints, and implementation of guidelines-results from an EHRA survey

Ventricular tachycardia (VT), and its occurrence, is still one of the main reasons for sudden cardiac death and, therefore, for increased mortality and morbidity foremost in patients with structural heart [Kahle A-K, Jungen C, Alken F-A, Scherschel K, Willems S, Pürerfellner H et al. Management of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy: contemporary armamentarium. Europace 2022;24:538-51]. Catheter ablation has become a safe and effective treatment option in patients with recurrent VT [Cronin EM, Bogun FM, Maury P, Peichl P, Chen M, Namboodiri N et al. 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm 2020;17:e2-154]. Previous and current guidelines provide guidance on indication for VT ablation and risk assessment and evaluation of underlying disease. However, no uniform recommendation is provided regarding procedural strategies, timing of ablation, and centre setting. Therefore, these specifics seem to differ largely, and recent data are sparse. This physician-based European Heart Rhythm Association survey aims to deliver insights on not only infrastructural settings but also procedural specifics, applied technologies, ablation strategies, and procedural endpoints. Therefore, these findings might deliver a real-world scenario of VT management and potentially are of guidance for other centres.

Post-Ablation cardiac Magnetic resonance to assess Ventricular Tachycardia recurrence (PAM-VT study)

AIMS

Conducting channels (CCs) detected by late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) are related to ventricular tachycardia (VT). The aim of this work was to study the ability of post-ablation LGE-CMR to evaluate ablation lesions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This is a prospective study of consecutive patients referred for a scar-related VT ablation. LGE-CMR was performed 6-12 months prior to ablation and 3-6 months after ablation. Scar characteristics of pre- and post-ablation LGE-CMR were compared. During the study period (March 2019-April 2021), 61 consecutive patients underwent scar-related VT ablation after LGE-CMR. Overall, 12 patients were excluded (4 had poor-quality LGE-CMR, 2 died before post-ablation LGE-CMR, and 6 underwent post-ablation LGE-CMR 12 months after ablation). Finally, 49 patients (age: 65.5 ± 9.8 years, 97.9% male, left ventricular ejection fraction: 34.8 ± 10.4%, 87.7% ischaemic cardiomyopathy) were included. Post-ablation LGE-CMR showed a decrease in the number (3.34 ± 1.03 vs. 1.6 ± 0.2; P < 0.0001) and mass (8.45 ± 1.3 vs. 3.5 ± 0.6 g; P < 0.001) of CCs. Arrhythmogenic CCs disappeared in 74.4% of patients. Dark core was detected in 75.5% of patients, and its presence was not related to CC reduction (52.2 ± 7.4% vs. 40.8 ± 10.6%, P = 0.57). VT recurrence after one year follow-up was 16.3%. The presence of two or more channels in the post-ablation LGE-CMR was a predictor of VT recurrence (31.82% vs. 0%, P = 0.0038) with a sensibility of 100% and specificity of 61% (area under the curve 0.82). In the same line, a reduction of CCs < 55% had sensibility of 100% and specificity of 61% (area under the curve 0.83) to predict VT recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Post-ablation LGE-CMR is feasible, and a reduction in the number of CCs is related with lower risk of VT recurrence. The dark core was not present in all patients. A decrease in VT substrate was also observed in patients without a dark core area in the post-ablation LGE-CMR.

SCMR expert consensus statement for cardiovascular magnetic resonance of patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a proven imaging modality for informing diagnosis and prognosis, guiding therapeutic decisions, and risk stratifying surgical intervention. Patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) would be expected to derive particular benefit from CMR given high prevalence of cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia. While several guidelines have been published over the last 16 years, it is important to recognize that both the CIED and CMR technologies, as well as our knowledge in MR safety, have evolved rapidly during that period. Given increasing utilization of CIED over the past decades, there is an unmet need to establish a consensus statement that integrates latest evidence concerning MR safety and CIED and CMR technologies. While experienced centers currently perform CMR in CIED patients, broad availability of CMR in this population is lacking, partially due to limited availability of resources for programming devices and appropriate monitoring, but also related to knowledge gaps regarding the risk-benefit ratio of CMR in this growing population. To address the knowledge gaps, this SCMR Expert Consensus Statement integrates consensus guidelines, primary data, and opinions from experts across disparate fields towards the shared goal of informing evidenced-based decision-making regarding the risk-benefit ratio of CMR for patients with CIEDs.

Twenty-five years of research in cardiac imaging in electrophysiology procedures for atrial and ventricular arrhythmias

Catheter ablation is nowadays considered the treatment of choice for numerous cardiac arrhythmias in different clinical scenarios. Fluoroscopy has traditionally been the primary imaging modality for catheter ablation, providing real-time visualization of catheter navigation. However, its limitations, such as inadequate soft tissue visualization and exposure to ionizing radiation, have prompted the integration of alternative imaging modalities. Over the years, advancements in imaging techniques have played a pivotal role in enhancing the safety, efficacy, and efficiency of catheter ablation procedures. This manuscript aims to explore the utility of imaging, including electroanatomical mapping, cardiac computed tomography, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and nuclear cardiology exams, in helping electrophysiology procedures. These techniques enable accurate anatomical guidance, identification of critical structures and substrates, and real-time monitoring of complications, ultimately enhancing procedural safety and success rates. Incorporating advanced imaging technologies into routine clinical practice has the potential to further improve clinical outcomes of catheter ablation procedures and pave the way for more personalized and precise ablation therapies in the future.

Management of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Heart Failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite substantial progress in medical and device-based heart failure (HF) therapy, ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) remain a major challenge. Here we review contemporary management of VA in the context of HF with one particular focus on recent advances in imaging and catheter ablation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Besides limited efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), their potentially life-threatening side effects are increasingly acknowledged. On the other hand, with tremendous advances in catheter technology, electroanatomical mapping, imaging, and understanding of arrhythmia mechanisms, catheter ablation has evolved into a safe, efficacious therapy. In fact, recent randomized trials support early catheter ablation, demonstrating superiority over AAD. Importantly, CMR imaging with gadolinium contrast has emerged as a central tool for the management of VA complicating HF: CMR is not only essential for an accurate diagnosis of the underlying entity and subsequent treatment decisions, but also improves risk stratification for SCD prevention and patient selection for ICD therapy. Finally, 3-dimensional characterization of arrhythmogenic substrate by CMR and imaging-guided ablation approaches substantially enhance procedural safety and efficacy. VA management in HF patients is highly complex and should be addressed in a multidisciplinary approach, preferably at specialized centers. While recent evidence supports early catheter ablation of VA, an impact on mortality remains to be demonstrated. Moreover, risk stratification for ICD therapy may have to be reconsidered, taking into account imaging, genetic testing, and other parameters beyond left ventricular function.

Utility of cardiac imaging in patients with ventricular tachycardia

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a life-threatening arrhythmia that may be idiopathic or result from structural heart disease. Cardiac imaging is critical in the diagnostic workup and risk stratification of patients with VT. Data gained from cardiac imaging provides information on likely mechanisms and sites of origin, as well as risk of intervention. Pre-procedural imaging can be used to plan access route(s) and identify patients where post-procedural intensive care may be required. Integration of cardiac imaging into electroanatomical mapping systems during catheter ablation procedures can facilitate the optimal approach, reduce radiation dose, and may improve clinical outcomes. Intraprocedural imaging helps guide catheter position, target substrate, and identify complications early. This review summarises the contemporary imaging modalities used in patients with VT, and their uses both pre-procedurally and intra-procedurally.

Scar conducting channel characterization to predict arrhythmogenicity during ventricular tachycardia ablation

AIMS

Heterogeneous tissue channels (HTCs) detected by late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) are related to ventricular arrhythmias, but there are few published data about their arrhythmogenic characteristics.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We enrolled 34 consecutive patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy who were referred for ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. LGE-CMR was performed prior to ablation, and the HTCs were analyzed. Arrhythmogenic HTCs linked to induced VT were identified during the VT ablation procedure. The characteristics of arrhythmogenic HTCs were compared with those of non-arrhythmogenic HTCs. Three patients were excluded due to low-quality LGE-CMR images. A total of 87 HTCs were identified on LGE-CMR in 31 patients (age:63.8 ± 12.3 years; 96.8% male; left ventricular ejection fraction: 36.1 ± 10.7%). Of the 87 HTCs, only 31 were considered arrhythmogenic because of their relation to a VT isthmus. The HTCs related to a VT isthmus were longer [64.6 ± 49.4 vs. 32.9 ± 26.6 mm; OR: 1.02; 95% CI: (1.01-1.04); P < 0.001] and had greater mass [2.5 ± 2.2 vs. 1.2 ± 1.2 grams; OR: 1.62; 95% CI: (1.18-2.21); P < 0.001], a higher degree of protectedness [26.19 ± 19.2 vs. 10.74 ± 8.4; OR 1.09; 95% CI: (1.04-1.14); P < 0.001], higher transmurality [number of wall layers with CCs: 3.8 ± 2.4 vs. 2.4 ± 2.0; OR: 1.31; 95% CI: (1.07-1.60); P = 0.008] and more ramifications [3.8 ± 2.0 vs. 2.7 ± 1.1; OR: 1.59; 95% CI: (1.15-2.19); P = 0.002] than non-arrhythmogenic HTCs. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that protectedness was the strongest predictor of arrhythmogenicity.

CONCLUSION

The protectedness of an HTC identified by LGE-CMR is strongly related to its arrhythmogenicity during VT ablation.

Preventive substrate ablation in chronic post-myocardial infarction patients with high-risk scar characteristics for ventricular arrhythmias: rationale and design of PREVENT-VT study

BACKGROUND

Recent studies showed that an early strategy for ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation resulted in reduction of VT episodes or mortality. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived border zone channel (BZC) mass has proved to be a strong non-invasive predictor of VT in post-myocardial infarction (MI). CMR-guided VT substrate ablation proved to be safe and effective for reducing sudden cardiac death (SCD) and VA occurrence.

METHODS

PREVENT-VT is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, and controlled trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prophylactic CMR-guided VT substrate ablation in chronic post-MI patients with CMR-derived arrhythmogenic scar characteristics. Chronic post-MI patients with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) CMR will be evaluated. CMR images will be post-processed and the BZC mass measured: patients with a BZC mass > 5.15 g will be eligible. Consecutive patients will be enrolled at 3 centers and randomized on a 1:1 basis to undergo a VT substrate ablation (ABLATE arm) or optimal medical treatment (OMT arm). Primary prevention ICD will be implanted following guideline recommendations, while non-ICD candidates will be implanted with an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM). The primary endpoint is a composite outcome of sudden cardiac death (SCD) or sustained monomorphic VT, either treated by an ICD or documented with ICM. Secondary endpoints are procedural safety and efficiency outcomes of CMR-guided ablation.

DISCUSSION

In some patients, the first VA episode causes SCD or severe neurological damage. The aim of the PREVENT-VT is to evaluate whether primary preventive substrate ablation may be a safe and effective prophylactic therapy for reducing SCD and VA occurrence in patients with previous MI and high-risk scar characteristics based on CMR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04675073, registered on January 1, 2021.

Improving Outcomes in Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Using Imaging to Identify Arrhythmic Substrates

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation is limited by modest acute and long-term success rates, in part due to the challenges in accurately identifying the arrhythmogenic substrate. The combination of multimodality imaging along with information from electroanatomic mapping allows for a more comprehensive assessment of the arrhythmogenic substrate which facilitates VT ablation, and the use of preprocedural imaging has been shown to improve long-term ablation outcomes. Beyond regional recognition of the arrhythmogenic substrate, advanced imaging techniques can be used to create tailored ablation strategies preprocedurally. This review will focus on how imaging can be used to guide ablation planning and execution with a focus on clinical applications aimed at improving the outcome of VT ablation procedures.

Substrate-based approaches in ventricular tachycardia ablation

Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with structural heart disease is now part of standard care. Mapping and ablation of the clinical VT is often limited when the VT is noninducible, nonsustained or not haemodynamically tolerated. Substrate-based ablation strategies have been developed in an aim to treat VT in this setting and, subsequently, have been shown to improve outcomes in VT ablation when compared to focused ablation of mapped VTs. Since the initial description of linear ablation lines targeting ventricular scar, many different approaches to substrate-based VT ablation have been developed. Strategies can broadly be divided into three categories: 1) targeting abnormal electrograms, 2) anatomical targeting of conduction channels between areas of myocardial scar, and 3) targeting areas of slow and/or decremental conduction, identified with “functional” substrate mapping techniques. This review summarises contemporary substrate-based ablation strategies, along with their strengths and weaknesses.

Late Potential Abolition in Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate-based ablation has become the gold standard treatment for patients with structural heart disease-related VT. VT is linked to re-entry in relation to myocardial scarring, with areas of conduction block (core scar) and of slow conduction (border zone). Slow conduction areas can be detected in sinus rhythm as late potentials (LPs). LP abolition has been shown to be the best end point to avoid long-term recurrences. Our study aimed to analyze the challenges of LP abolition and the predictors of failure. We analyzed 169 consecutive patients with structural heart disease (61% ischemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular ejection fraction: 37 ± 13%) who underwent VT ablation between 2013 and 2018. A preprocedural clinical evaluation, including cardiac magnetic resonance, was done in 66% of patients. Electroanatomical mapping with the identification of LPs was performed in all patients. Noninducibility was achieved in 71% (119), and complete LP abolition was achieved in 61% (103) of patients. Incomplete LP abolition was a powerful predictor of VT recurrence (67% vs 33%, hazard ratio 3.19 [2.1 to 4.7]; p <0.001). Lack of use of a high-density mapping catheter (odds ratio 6.2, 1.2 to 38.1; p = 0.028), the septal substrate (odds ratio 9.34, 2.27 to 38.4; p = 0.002), and larger left ventricular mass (190 ± 58 g vs 156 ± 46 g, p = 0.002) were predictors of incomplete LP abolition. The main reasons that contributed to unsuccessful LP abolition were anatomic obstacles (such as the conduction system) and large extension of the LP area. In conclusion, incomplete LP abolition is related to VT recurrence. Lack of use of a high-density mapping catheter, the septal substrate, and larger left ventricular mass are related to incomplete LP abolition.

Ablation Lesion Assessment with MRI

Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI is capable of detecting not only native cardiac fibrosis, but also ablation-induced scarring. Thus, it offers the unique opportunity to assess ablation lesions non-invasively. In the atrium, LGE-MRI has been shown to accurately detect and localise gaps in ablation lines. With a negative predictive value close to 100% it can reliably rule out pulmonary vein reconnection non-invasively and thus may avoid unnecessary invasive repeat procedures where a pulmonary vein isolation only approach is pursued. Even LGE-MRI-guided repeat pulmonary vein isolation has been demonstrated to be feasible as a standalone approach. LGE-MRI-based lesion assessment may also be of value to evaluate the efficacy of ventricular ablation. In this respect, the elimination of LGE-MRI-detected arrhythmogenic substrate may serve as a potential endpoint, but validation in clinical studies is lacking. Despite holding great promise, the widespread use of LGE-MRI is still limited by the absence of standardised protocols for image acquisition and post-processing. In particular, reproducibility across different centres is impeded by inconsistent thresholds and internal references to define fibrosis. Thus, uniform methodological and analytical standards are warranted to foster a broader implementation in clinical practice.

[Update on ablation of ventricular tachyarrhythmias]

Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) is performed with increasing frequency in clinical practice. Whereas the reported success rates of idiopathic VT are high, catheter ablation of VT in patients with structural heart disease with its scar-related re-entry mechanism may remain a challenge especially if deep intramyocardial or epicardial portions exist. The integration of modern cardiac imaging, new functional mapping strategies and catheter technologies allow optimized identification and characterization of the critical arrhythmogenic substrate and hence a more targeted VT ablation. The extent to which these innovations will have the potential to improve VT ablation success rates will be determined by future studies.

Detailed Assessment of Low-Voltage Zones Localization by Cardiac MRI in Patients With Implantable Devices

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the performance and limitations of low-voltage zones (LVZ) localization by optimized late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) scar imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs).

BACKGROUND

Scar evaluation by LGE-CMR can assist ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation, but challenges with electroanatomical maps coregistration and presence of imaging artefacts from CIED limit accuracy.

METHODS

A total of 10 patients underwent VT ablation and preprocedural LGE-CMR using wideband imaging. Scar was segmented from CMR pixel signal intensity maps using commercial software (ADAS-VT, Galgo Medical) with bespoke tools and compared with detailed electroanatomical maps (CARTO). Coregistration of EP and imaging-derived scar was performed using the aorta as a fiducial marker, and the impact of coregistration was determined by assessing intraobserver/interobserver variability and using computer simulations. Spatial smoothing was applied to assess correlation at different spatial resolutions and to reduce noise.

RESULTS

Pixel signal intensity maps localized low-voltage zones (V <1.5 mV) with area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve: 0.82 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.76-0.83), sensitivity 74% (IQR: 71%-77%), and specificity 78% (IQR: 73%-83%) and correlated with bipolar voltage (r = -0.57 [IQR: -0.68 to -0.42]) across patients. In simulations, small random shifts and rotations worsened LVZ localization in at least some cases. The use of the full aortic geometry ensured high reproducibility of LVZ localization (r >0.86 for area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve). Spatial smoothing improved localization of LVZ. Results for LVZ with V <0.5 mV were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CIEDs, novel wideband CMR sequences and personalized coregistration strategies can localize LVZ with good accuracy and may assist VT ablation procedures.

Ablation of ventricular tachycardia in 2021

Nowadays, ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in structural heart disease is an increasingly used procedure. In fact, it is the most effective strategy in controlling arrhythmic burden in VT patients. The ablative approaches are the result of the last 10 years of technological advances (Catheters, 3D mapping systems) and the constant study of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying arrhythmic circuits. This presentation seeks to revisit the state of the art in the ablative treatment of VT.

Whole-heart ventricular arrhythmia modeling moving forward: Mechanistic insights and translational applications

Ventricular arrhythmias are the primary cause of sudden cardiac death and one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Whole-heart computational modeling offers a unique approach for studying ventricular arrhythmias, offering vast potential for developing both a mechanistic understanding of ventricular arrhythmias and clinical applications for treatment. In this review, the fundamentals of whole-heart ventricular modeling and current methods of personalizing models using clinical data are presented. From this foundation, the authors summarize recent advances in whole-heart ventricular arrhythmia modeling. Efforts in gaining mechanistic insights into ventricular arrhythmias are discussed, in addition to other applications of models such as the assessment of novel therapeutics. The review emphasizes the unique benefits of computational modeling that allow for insights that are not obtainable by contemporary experimental or clinical means. Additionally, the clinical impact of modeling is explored, demonstrating how patient care is influenced by the information gained from ventricular arrhythmia models. The authors conclude with future perspectives about the direction of whole-heart ventricular arrhythmia modeling, outlining how advances in neural network methodologies hold the potential to reduce computational expense and permit for efficient whole-heart modeling.

Cardiac magnetic resonance to predict recurrences after ventricular tachycardia ablation: septal involvement, transmural channels, and left ventricular mass

AIMS

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate-based ablation has an increasing role in patients with structural heart disease-related VT. VT is linked to re-entry in relation to myocardial scarring with areas of conduction block (core scar) and areas of slow conduction [border zone (BZ)]. VT substrate can be analysed by late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR). Our study aims to analyse the role of LGE-CMR in identifying predictors of VT recurrence after ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed 110 consecutive patients who underwent VT ablation from 2013 to 2018. All patients underwent a preprocedural LGE-CMR, and in 94 patients (85.5%), the CMR was used to aid the ablation. All LGE-CMR images were semi-automatically processed using dedicated software to detect scarring and conducting channels. After a median follow-up of 2.7 ± 1.6 years, the overall VT recurrence was 41.8% with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock reduction from 43.6% to 28.2% before and after ablation, respectively. The amount of BZ (26.6 ± 13.9 vs. 19.6 ± 9.7 g, P = 0.012), the total amount of scarring (37.1 ± 18.2 vs. 29 ± 16.3 g, P = 0,033), and left ventricular (LV) mass (168.3 ± 53.3 vs. 152.3 ± 46.4 g, P < 0.001) were associated with VT recurrence. LGE septal distribution [62.5% vs. 37.8%; hazard ratio (HR) 1.67 (1.02-3.93), P = 0.044], channels with transmural path [66.7% vs. 31.4%, HR 3.25 (1.70-6.23), P < 0.001], and midmural channels [54.3% vs. 27.6%, HR 2.49 (1.21-5.13), P = 0.013] were related with VT recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of septal LGE [HR 3.67 (1.60-8.38), P = 0.002], transmural channels [HR 2.32 (1.15-4.72), P = 0.019], and LV mass [HR 1.01 (1.005-1.019), P = 0.002] were independent predictors of VT recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Pre-procedural LGE-CMR is a helpful and feasible technique to identify patients with high risk of VT recurrence after ablation. LV mass, septal LGE distribution, and transmural channels were predictive factors of post-ablation VT recurrence.

Scar channels in cardiac magnetic resonance to predict appropriate therapies in primary prevention

BACKGROUND

Scar characteristics analyzed by late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) are related with ventricular arrhythmias. Current guidelines are based only on the left ventricular ejection fraction to recommend an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in primary prevention.

OBJECTIVES

Our study aims to analyze the role of imaging to stratify arrhythmogenic risk in patients with ICD for primary prevention.

METHODS

From 2006 to 2017, we included 200 patients with LGE-CMR before ICD implantation for primary prevention. The scar, border zone, core, and conducting channels (CCs) were automatically measured by a dedicated software.

RESULTS

The mean age was 60.9 ± 10.9 years; 81.5% (163) were men; 52% (104) had ischemic cardiomyopathy. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 29% ± 10.1%. After a follow-up of 4.6 ± 2 years, 46 patients (22%) reached the primary end point (appropriate ICD therapy). Scar mass (36.2 ± 19 g vs 21.7 ± 10 g; P < .001), border zone mass (26.4 ± 12.5 g vs 16.0 ± 9.5 g; P < .001), core mass (9.9 ± 8.6 g vs 5.5 ± 5.7 g; P < .001), and CC mass (3.0 ± 2.6 g vs 1.6 ± 2.3 g; P < .001) were associated with appropriate therapies. Scar mass > 10 g (25.31% vs 5.26%; hazard ratio 4.74; P = .034) and the presence of CCs (34.75% vs 8.93%; hazard ratio 4.07; P = .003) were also strongly associated with the primary end point. However, patients without channels and with scar mass < 10 g had a very low rate of appropriate therapies (2.8%).

CONCLUSION

Scar characteristics analyzed by LGE-CMR are strong predictors of appropriate therapies in patients with ICD in primary prevention. The absence of channels and scar mass < 10 g can identify patients at a very low risk of ventricular arrhythmias in this population.

Updates in Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to recurrent ventricular tachycardia is an important clinical sequela in patients with structural heart disease. As a result, ventricular tachycardia (VT) has emerged as a major clinical and public health problem. The mechanism of VT is predominantly mediated by re-entry in the presence of arrhythmogenic substrate (scar), though focal mechanisms are also important. Catheter ablation for VT, when compared to standard medical therapy, has been shown to improve VT-free survival and burden of device therapies. Approaches to VT ablation are dependent on the underlying disease process, broadly classified into idiopathic (no structural heart disease) or structural heart disease (ischemic or non-ischemic heart disease). This update aims to review recent advances made for the treatment of VT ablation, with respect to current clinical trials, peri-procedure risk assessments, pre-procedural cardiac imaging, electro-anatomic mapping and advances in catheter and non-catheter based ablation techniques.