Impact of the ablation technique on release of the neuronal injury marker S100B during pulmonary vein isolation

Recurrences after Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Incidence, Mechanisms, Predictors, and Comparison with Thermal Energy

Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) is the latest and most intriguing technology for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation, due to its capability to generate irreversible and cardiomyocytes-selective electroporation of cell membranes by delivering microsecond-lasting high-voltage electrical fields, leading to high expectations. The first trials to assess the clinical success of PFA, reported an arrhythmia-free survival at 1-year of 78.5%, while other trials showed less enthusiastic results: 66.2% in paroxysmal and 55.1% in persistent AF. Nevertheless, real world data are encouraging. The isolation of pulmonary veins with PFA is easily achieved with 100% acute success. Systematic invasive remapping showed a high prevalence of durable pulmonary vein isolation at 75 and 90 days (range 84-96%), which were significatively lower in redo procedures (64.3%). The advent of PFA is prompting a reconsideration of the role of the autonomic nervous system in AF ablation, as PFA-related sparing of the ganglionated plexi could lead to the still undetermined effect on late arrhythmias' recurrences. Moreover, a new concept of a blanking period could be formulated with PFA, according to its different mechanism of myocardial injury, with less inflammation and less chronic fibrosis. Finally, in this review, we also compare PFA with thermal energy.

Meta-analysis of pulsed-field ablation versus cryoablation for atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

The available data on the treatment strategy of pulsed field ablation (PFA) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is limited. This study aims to provide a comparative analysis of the efficacy, safety, and procedural efficiency between PFA and cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for AF.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases to identify trials comparing PFA with CBA for AF from their inception until December 2023. The odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD), along with a 95% confidence interval (CI), were utilized as measures of treatment effect.

RESULTS

The analysis included 15 eligible trials with a total enrollment of 1880 patients. No significant differences were found in recurrent atrial arrhythmia (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.64, 1.07) or periprocedural complications (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.46, 1.30) between the two ablation techniques examined in this study. However, the PFA technique demonstrated a significantly shorter procedure time (MD -7.17, 95% CI -13.60, -0.73), but a longer fluoroscopy time (MD 2.53, 95% CI 0.87, 4.19). Similarly, PFA was found to be significantly associated with a decreased incidence of phrenic nerve palsy (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07, 0.59), but an increased incidence of cardiac tamponade (OR 4.07, 95% CI 1.15, 14.39). Moreover, there was a significantly higher release of troponin with PFA compared to CBA (MD 470.28, 95% CI 18.89, 921.67), while the increase in S100 protein and heart rate was significantly lower with PFA than with CBA (MD -64.41, 95% CI -105.46, -17.36), (MD -8.76, 95% CI -15.12, -2.40).

CONCLUSION

The utilization of PFA provides a safer, time-saving, and tissue-specific procedure compared to CBA, while maintaining comparable success rates. This has the potential to enhance procedural efficiency and optimize resource utilization in clinical practice. These findings underscore the feasibility and promise of PFA as an alternative technique for PVI in patients with AF.

Impact of Pulsed-Field Ablation on Intrinsic Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System After Pulmonary Vein Isolation

BACKGROUND

Although the autonomic reaction such as bradycardia is observed frequently during pulsed-field ablation (PFA)-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), its mechanism and effect on the adjacent intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system (ICANS) are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to reveal the clinical impact of PFA on ICANS by investigating the serum S100 increase (ΔS100), a well-known denervation relevant biomarker.

METHODS

Pre- and postprocedural serum S100 analyses were systematically conducted in patients undergoing PVI using either the pentaspline PFA or cryoballoon ablation (CBA) system. ΔS100 release kinetics were compared between both technologies. Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging was conducted to eliminate the effect of central nervous system release.

RESULTS

A total of 97 patients (PFA: n = 54 and CBA: n = 43) were enrolled. Overall S100 increased in both groups with a lower amount in PFA (0.035 μg/L; IQR: 0.02-0.063 μg/L) compared with CBA (0.12 μg/L; IQR: 0.09-0.17 μg/L; P < 0.0001). In cerebral magnetic resonance imaging, silent emboli were detected in 10 patients (18.5%) in PFA and 7 patients (16.3%) in CBA (P = 0.773). Even after excluding patients with cerebral emboli, ΔS100 was lower in PFA. During PFA PVI, 30 patients (56%) demonstrated transient bradycardia in 70 of 210 PVs (35%). ΔS100 was similar between patients with or without transient bradycardia.

CONCLUSIONS

We report a significantly lower S100 release following PFA PVI vs CBA PVI even if silent cerebral emboli were excluded. Notably, vagal response during PFA was not associated with S100 release. These observations are in line with lower nervous tissue destruction of PFA compared with CBA.