Ablation of residual potentials along the circumferential line reduces acute pulmonary vein reconnection

INTRODUCTION

Acute pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection is frequently encountered in patients undergoing PV isolation (PVI) procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. In this study, we investigated whether the identification and ablation of residual potentials (RPs), after the initial achievement of PVI, reduces acute PV reconnection rate.

METHODS

Following PVI in 160 patients, mapping along the ablation line was performed to identify RPs, defined as bipolar amplitude ≥0.2 mV or 0.1-0.19 mV combined with a negative component of the unipolar electrogram. Ipsilateral PV sets with RPs were randomized to either no further ablation (Group B) or to additional ablation of the identified RPs (Group C). The primary study endpoint was spontaneous or adenosine-mediated acute PV reconnection after a 30-min waiting period and was also evaluated in ipsilateral PV sets without RPs (Group A).

RESULTS

After isolation of 287 PV pairs, 135 had no RPs (Group A), whereas the remaining PV pairs were randomized to either Group B (n = 75) or Group C (n = 77). Ablation of RPs resulted in a reduction of spontaneous or adenosine-mediated PV reconnection rate (16.9% in Group C vs 48.0% in Group B; p < 0.001). Group A was associated with a significantly lower percentage of acute PV reconnection as compared to Group B (5.9% vs 48.0%; p < 0.001) and Group C (5.9% vs 16.9%; p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

After PVI achievement, the absence of RPs along the circumferential line is associated with a low likelihood of acute PV reconnection rate. Ablation of RPs significantly reduces spontaneous or adenosine-mediated acute PV reconnection rate.

Anatomy-based characteristics of far-field SVC electrograms in right superior pulmonary veins after isolation

Background. Far-field electrograms from superior vena cava (SVC) can be present in right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV) after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. Objectives. To analyze the characteristics of far-field SVC potentials in RSPV after PV isolation and the local anatomy difference between patients with and without the potentials. Methods. Patients undergoing PV isolation were retrospectively reviewed, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) was performed before procedure for observing the anatomical relationship between RSPV and SVC. The prevalence and characteristics of far-field SVC electrograms were described and compared to far-field left atrial potentials at the nearest point along the linear ablation lesion. The anatomical proximity of RSPV and SVC on a 2-dimensional horizontal CT view was compared between patients with and without far-field SVC potentials. Results. Far-field SVC electrograms were observed in 35/92(38%) patients with an amplitude of 0.24 ± 0.11 mV and a major deflection slope of 0.051 ± 0.036 mV, both significantly higher than far-field left atrial electrograms (p < .001). In patients with far-field SVC electrograms, 83% had connected RSPV-SVC, defined as distance between RSPV and SVC endocardium less than 3 mm at the layer of RSPV ostium roof, while in patients without far-field SVC electrograms, 70% had disconnected RSPV-SVC. Conclusions. Far-field SVC electrograms appeared in RSPV had a prevalence higher than previously reported and a sharper major deflection compared to far-field left atrial electrograms. Connected RSPV-SVC on CT was associated with the presence of far-field SVC electrograms.

Validation of a multipolar pulsed-field ablation catheter for endpoint assessment in pulmonary vein isolation procedures

AIMS

To validate the performance of a multipolar pulsed-field ablation (PFA) catheter compared to a standard pentaspline 3D-mapping catheter for endpoint assessment of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). PFA for PVI using single-shot devices combines the benefits of high procedural efficacy and safety. A newly available multipolar PFA catheter allows real-time recording of pulmonary vein (PV) signals during PVI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients undergoing first PVI using PFA with the standard ablation protocol (eight applications per PV) were studied. Entrance and exit block (10 V/2 ms) were assessed using the PFA catheter. Subsequently, a high-density 3D electroanatomical bipolar voltage map (3D-EAM) was constructed using a standard pentaspline 3D-mapping catheter. Additional PFA applications were delivered only after confirmation of residual PV connection by 3D-EAM. In 56 patients, 213 PVs were targeted for ablation. Acute PVI was achieved in 100% of PVs: in 199/213 (93%) PVs with the standard ablation protocol alone and in the remaining 14 PVs after additional PFA applications. The accuracy of PV assessment with the PFA catheter after the standard ablation protocol was 91% (194/213 veins). In 5/213 (2.3%) PVs, the PFA catheter incorrectly indicated PV-isolation. In 14/213 (6.6%), the PFA catheter incorrectly indicated residual PV-conduction due to high-output pace-capture. Lowering the output to 5 V/1 ms reduced this observation to 0.9% (2/213) and increased the overall accuracy to 97% (206/213).

CONCLUSION

A novel multipolar PFA catheter allows reliable endpoint assessment for PVI. Due to its design, far-field sensing and high-output pace-capture can occur. Lowering the pacing output increases the accuracy from 91 to 97%.

Splitting the P-Wave: Improved Evaluation of Left Atrial Substrate Modification after Pulmonary Vein Isolation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial substrate modification after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF) can be assessed non-invasively by analyzing P-wave duration in the electrocardiogram (ECG). However, whether right (RA) and left atrium (LA) contribute equally to this phenomenon remains unknown. The present study splits fundamental P-wave features to investigate the different RA and LA contributions to P-wave duration. Recordings of 29 pAF patients undergoing first-ever PVI were acquired before and after PVI. P-wave features were calculated: P-wave duration (PWD), duration of the first (PWDon-peak) and second (PWDpeak-off) P-wave halves, estimating RA and LA conduction, respectively. P-wave onset (PWon-R) or offset (PWoff-R) to R-peak interval, measuring combined atrial/atrioventricular and single atrioventricular conduction, respectively. Heart-rate fluctuation was corrected by scaling. Pre- and post-PVI results were compared with Mann–Whitney U-test. PWD was correlated with the remaining features. Only PWD (non-scaling: Δ=−9.84%, p=0.0085, scaling: Δ=−17.96%, p=0.0442) and PWDpeak-off (non-scaling: Δ=−22.03%, p=0.0250, scaling: Δ=−27.77%, p=0.0268) were decreased. Correlation of all features with PWD was significant before/after PVI (p<0.0001), showing the highest value between PWD and PWon-R (ρmax=0.855). PWD correlated more with PWDon-peak (ρ= 0.540–0.805) than PWDpeak-off (ρ= 0.419–0.710). PWD shortening after PVI of pAF stems mainly from the second half of the P-wave. Therefore, noninvasive estimation of LA conduction time is critical for the study of atrial substrate modification after PVI and should be addressed by splitting the P-wave in order to achieve improved estimations.

Splitting the P-Wave: Improved Evaluation of Left Atrial Substrate Modification after Pulmonary Vein Isolation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial substrate modification after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF) can be assessed non-invasively by analyzing P-wave duration in the electrocardiogram (ECG). However, whether right (RA) and left atrium (LA) contribute equally to this phenomenon remains unknown. The present study splits fundamental P-wave features to investigate the different RA and LA contributions to P-wave duration. Recordings of 29 pAF patients undergoing first-ever PVI were acquired before and after PVI. P-wave features were calculated: P-wave duration (PWD), duration of the first (PWDon-peak) and second (PWDpeak-off) P-wave halves, estimating RA and LA conduction, respectively. P-wave onset (PWon-R) or offset (PWoff-R) to R-peak interval, measuring combined atrial/atrioventricular and single atrioventricular conduction, respectively. Heart-rate fluctuation was corrected by scaling. Pre- and post-PVI results were compared with Mann-Whitney U-test. PWD was correlated with the remaining features. Only PWD (non-scaling: Δ=-9.84%, p=0.0085, scaling: Δ=-17.96%, p=0.0442) and PWDpeak-off (non-scaling: Δ=-22.03%, p=0.0250, scaling: Δ=-27.77%, p=0.0268) were decreased. Correlation of all features with PWD was significant before/after PVI (p<0.0001), showing the highest value between PWD and PWon-R (ρmax=0.855). PWD correlated more with PWDon-peak (ρ= 0.540-0.805) than PWDpeak-off (ρ= 0.419-0.710). PWD shortening after PVI of pAF stems mainly from the second half of the P-wave. Therefore, noninvasive estimation of LA conduction time is critical for the study of atrial substrate modification after PVI and should be addressed by splitting the P-wave in order to achieve improved estimations.

Significance of electrical activity in the right superior pulmonary vein post-isolation and relationship to superior vena cava potentials

PURPOSE

After antral pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), electrical potentials may persist deep in the right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV). Whether these potentials signify true pulmonary vein potential (PVP) (implying inadequate RSPV isolation) or are far-field potentials (FFP) from the superior vena cava (SVC) is unclear. Here, we attempt to assess the incidence of persistent potentials in RSPV post-isolation and methods to differentiate PVP from FFP.

METHODS

Following PVI, we mapped the RSPV and the SVC with simultaneously placed catheters. We recorded the incidence of SVC potentials, RSPV potentials, and distance between the 2 structures. When RSPV potentials were present, we assessed (1) relationship to SVC potentials, (2) RSPV-SVC distance, and (3) responses on pacing from either site.

RESULTS

Among 43 consecutive post-PVI patients, 39 (91%) patients had SVC electrical activity but only 10 had persistent RSPV potentials. Of these, 2/10 had true PVP, and 8 were FFP from SVC. Bipolar electrogram morphology did not differentiate PVP from FFP, but low-amplitude (5 mA) SVC pacing was an effective maneuver. However, high-amplitude (≥ 10 mA) pacing from SVC and/or RSPV could result in far-field capture of the other site even when RSPV was devoid of electrical activity. Average RSPV-SVC distance was 15.9 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent RSPV potentials occur rarely post-PVI despite the close proximity to electrically active SVC. When present, true PVP can be differentiated from FFP by low-amplitude pacing from SVC. Bipolar EGM morphology and high-amplitude pacing are unreliable at differentiating these potentials.

Epicardial and Endocardial Validation of Conduction Block After Thoracoscopic Epicardial Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Objective

It is unknown whether epicardial and endocardial validation of bidirectional block after thoracoscopic surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation is comparable. Epicardial validation may lead to false-positive results due to epicardial tissue edema, and thus could leave gaps with subsequent arrhythmia recurrence. It is the aim of the present study to answer this question in patients who underwent hybrid atrial fibrillation ablation (combined thoracoscopic epicardial and endocardial catheter ablation).

Methods

After epicardial ablation of the pulmonary veins (PVs) and connecting inferior and roof lines (box lesion), exit and entrance block were epicardially and endocardially evaluated using an endocardial His Bundle catheter and electrophysiological workstation. If incomplete lesions were found, endocardial touch-up ablation was performed. Validation results were also compared to predictions about conduction block based on tissue conductance measurements of the epicardial ablation device.

Results

Twenty-five patients were included. Epicardial validation results were 100% equal to the endocardial results for the left superior, left inferior, and right inferior PVs and box lesion. For the right superior PV, 85% similarity was found. Based on tissue conductance measurements, 139 lesions were expected to be complete; however, in 5 (3.6%) a gap was present.

Conclusions

Epicardial bidirectional conduction block in the PVs and the box lesion corresponded well with endocardial bidirectional conduction block. Conduction block predictions by changes in tissue conductance failed in few cases compared to block confirmation. This emphasizes that tissue conduction measurements can provide a rough indication of lesion effectiveness but needs endpoint confirmation by either epicardial or endocardial block testing.

Pulmonary vein antral isolation causes depolarization of vein sleeves: Implications for the assessment of isolation

PURPOSE

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation has been shown to result in inexcitability of a large fraction of pulmonary veins (PVs), but the mechanism is unknown. We investigated the mechanism of PV inexcitability by assessing the effects of PVI on the electrophysiology of PV sleeves.

METHODS

Patients undergoing first-time radiofrequency PVI were studied. Capture threshold, effective refractory period (ERP), and excitability were measured in PVs and the left atrial appendage (LAA) before and after ablation. Adenosine was used to assess both transient reconnection and transient venous re-excitability.

RESULTS

We assessed 248 veins among 67 patients. Mean PV ERP (249.7 ± 54.0 ms) and capture threshold (1.4 ± 1.6 mA) increased to 300.5 ± 67.1 and 5.7 ± 5.6 mA, respectively (P < .0001 for both) in the 26.9% PVs that remained excitable, but no change was noted in either measure in the LAA. In 16.3% of the 73.1% inexcitable veins, transient PV re-excitability (as opposed to reconnection) was seen with adenosine administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Antral PVI causes inexcitability in a majority of the PVs, which can transiently be restored in some with adenosine. Among PVs that remain excitable, ERP and capture threshold increase significantly. These data imply resting membrane potential depolarization of the of PV myocardial sleeves. As PV inexcitability hampers the assessment of entrance and exit block, demonstrating transient PV re-excitability during adenosine administration helps ensure true isolation.

Impact of atrial rhythm on pulmonary vein signals in cryoballoon ablation - Sinus rhythm predicts real-time observation of pulmonary vein isolation

Purpose

Real-time observation of pulmonary vein (PV) potentials with a spiral mapping catheter has emerged as a key electrogram-based procedural parameter to estimate lesion quality and titrate cryoenergy application during PV isolation (PVI) with the cryoballoon. Whether correct PV electrogram interpretation and thus PVI real-time observation rate depends on atrial rhythm during cryoballoon PVI is unknown. We compared observation rates of time-to PV isolation (TTI) during sinus rhythm (SR group) and during atrial fibrillation (AFib group) in cryoballoon PVI.

Methods

We prospectively included 157 consecutive patients undergoing cryoballoon PVI and compared the incidence of PVI real-time recording of each pulmonary vein during SR and in AFib.

Results

Overall PVI real-time observation rate was 82.1% (491/598 PV) with significantly higher TTI observation rate in the SR group (315/365 PV, 86.3%) compared to the AFib group (176/233 PV, 75.5%; p < 0.001). Per vein analysis demonstrated that only TTI observation rate in the left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV) was significantly higher during SR (85/92, 92.4%) compared to AFib (37/54, 68.5%; p < 0.001). Regression analysis revealed that atrial rhythm is a strong and independent predictor of PVI real-time observation in the LSPV with an odds ratio of 4.98 (95%-CI: 1.86–13.34, p = 0.001) to detect TTI during SR.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that correct interpretation of PV electrograms and thus PVI real-time observation is more likely in SR than in AFib. Hence, cardioversion of patients in AFib at the beginning of the procedure should be considered to yield higher PVI real-time observation rates facilitating TTI guided cryoenergy titration.

Novel spiral mapping catheter facilitates observation of the time-to-pulmonary vein isolation during cryoballoon ablation

Observation of the time-to-pulmonary vein isolation (TTI) by a spiral mapping catheter has emerged as a valuable procedural parameter in cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The 1st generation spiral mapping catheter (Achieve, SMC1) has been available as an 8-polar catheter with a distal loop diameter of 15 or 20 mm. The novel spiral mapping catheter (Achieve Advance, SMC2) was designed as a true guidewire and is available, in addition to the sizes of the SMC1, as a 10-polar mapping catheter with a distal loop diameter of 25 mm. Whether these novel features of SMC2 influence procedural characteristics of Cryo-PVI in comparison to SMC1 has not been reported. In this prospective cohort study 158 patients (age 65.1 ± 12.4 years, female 39%, paroxysmal AF 60%) undergoing PVI with the 2nd generation cryoballoon were included. SMC1 was used in 57 patients (36%), whereas 101 patients (64%) underwent Cryo-PVI with the SMC2. All PVs (623/623, 100%) were isolated successfully. Mean procedure duration was 72.0 ± 18.9 min in the SMC1 group and 74.4 ± 19.1 min in the SMC2 group (p = 0.432). Mean fluoroscopy time was also not different between both study groups (SMC1 15.7 ± 6.6 min, SMC2 15.7 ± 7.3 min, p = 0.593). TTI was observed in 68.6% of pulmonary veins in the SMC1 group, whereas TTI observation rate was 82.6% in the SMC2 group (p < 0.001). Number of freezes (5.5 ± 1.5 vs. 6.5 ± 1.9; p = 0.001) and total freeze duration (14.1 ± 4.5 vs. 17.6 ± 5.6; p < 0.001) were increased in the SMC2 group. SMC2 significantly increases TTI observation rate during Cryo-PVI. Procedure duration and fluoroscopy time are similar and number of freezes and total freeze duration are increased compared to PVI with SMC1 due to decreased stability and maneuverability of SMC2.

A quantitative comparison of the electrical and anatomical definition of the pulmonary vein ostium

BACKGROUND

Anatomically guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, the position where to confirm electrical isolation is ill-defined. The aim of the current study was to quantify the relationship between the anatomical and electrical definition of the pulmonary vein ostium.

METHODS

We analyzed 20 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing PVI using radiofrequency energy and an electroanatomical mapping system. The anatomical ostium was defined based on the geometry obtained from preprocedural magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. The electrical ostium was defined at the position with a far-field atrial signal preceding a sharp pulmonary vein (PV) signal without any isoelectric interval in between.

RESULTS

The electrically defined ostia were 8.4 ± 4.7 mm more distal in the PV compared to the anatomically defined ostia. The distances varied considerably between the four PVs and were 10.5 ± 6.5 mm, 7.4 ± 4.3 mm, 5.3 ± 4.0 mm, and 8.3 ± 3.4 mm for the left superior, left inferior, right superior, and right inferior PVs, respectively (P  =  0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

The position of the electrical and anatomical ostium differs markedly. The site of the electrical ostium is variable within the PV but always more distal in the PV compared to the site of the anatomical ostium.

Automated verification of pulmonary vein isolation in radiofrequency- and cryoballoon-guided ablation

BACKGROUND

Verification of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) can be challenging due to the coexistence of pulmonary vein potentials and far-field potentials. This study aimed to prospectively validate a novel algorithm for automated verification of PVI in radiofrequency (RF)-guided and cryoballoon (CB)-guided ablation strategies.

METHODS

A data set of 620 (RF: 516 EGMs and CB: 104 EGMs) bipolar electrograms (EGM), recorded by circular mapping catheter placed at the left atrium-pulmonary vein (PV) junction, were prospectively analyzed by a two-step algorithm. The algorithm differentiates isolated from nonisolated EGMs based on typology and specific parameters of the bipolar EGMs. EGMs were recorded at baseline and after proven isolation in RF- and CB-guided procedures. Additionally, in the RF group, EGMs during encircling of the PVs were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the RF and CB group, the algorithm correctly identifies EGMs as isolated or nonisolated with respectively 93% and 96% sensitivity and 86% and 90% specificity. In the RF subgroups of (1) baseline and proven isolated EGMs, (2) EGMs during encircling, and (3) EGMs in redo procedures sensitivity was 96%, 88%, and 100%, respectively, with specificity of 81%, 91%, and 100%. Fourteen out of 14 (100%) reconnected PVs were correctly identified as containing PVPs. Eleven out of 12 (92%) failed freeze attempts were correctly identified as being nonisolated.

CONCLUSION

We validated a two-step algorithm for automated PVI verification, applicable both for RF- and CB-guided PVI. The algorithm automatically differentiates isolated from nonisolated PVs with high accuracy and without the need for pacing maneuvers.

The utility of atrial pacing for identifying the electrical breakthrough sites between the left atrium and pulmonary veins

Background

Circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is occasionally difficult to achieve because electrical breakthrough sites (EBSs) between the left atrium (LA) and PVs cannot be identified during ablation especially in the carina regions.

Methods

The left PVs (Lt.PVs) of 60 AF patients and the right PVs (Rt.PVs) of 37 patients undergoing PV isolation were studied. When PV isolation was not achieved after the initial circumferential PV isolation, atrial pacing was repeatedly performed from the distal coronary sinus (CSd) and high right atrium (HRA), and the time interval from the stimulus to the earliest PV potential (stimulus-PV interval) was measured using circular mapping catheters at each PV until PV isolation was achieved. When PV isolation was achieved via local Radiofrequency (RF) deliveries, those regions were diagnosed as final EBSs. We classified the final EBSs into six segments for each PV (anterior and posterior PV walls of the roof, carina, and bottom) and investigated the relationship between the final EBSs and stimulus-PV intervals.

Results

For Lt.PVs, the stimulus-PV intervals during CSd pacing were significantly shorter than during HRA pacing at the Lt.PV anterior carina and bottom (90±28 ms vs. 125±26 ms, P<0.001 and 84±20 ms vs. 148±24 ms, P=0.028, respectively), but there was no significant difference in the Lt.PV roof and any posterior segments. For Rt.PVs, the stimulus-PV interval from both pacing sites exhibited no significant difference between either segment.

Conclusions

This pacing method may help to identify whether EBSs are located in the anterior Lt.PVs. Improved recognition of EBSs through pacing from different sites would be helpful for achieving PV isolation.

Achieving Bidirectional Long Delays In Pulmonary Vein Antral Lines Prior To Bidirectional Block In Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (The Bi-Bi Technique For Atrial Fibrillation Ablation)

Background: Pulmonary Vein Antral isolation (PVAI) is currently the standard of care for both paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation ablation. Reconnection to the pulmonary vein is the most common cause of recurrence of atrial fibrillation. Achieving the endpoint of bidirectional block (BDB) for cavotricuspid isthmus dependant flutter has improved our outcomes for atrial flutter ablation. With this we tried to achieve long delays in the pulmonary veins antral lines prior to complete isolation comparable to those delays found in patient with bidirectional block of atrial flutter lines. Study Objective:The objective of this paper was to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of achieving Bidirectional long delays in pulmonary vein antral lines prior to Bidirectional Block in patient with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Method: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation procedures at Unity Point Methodist from January 2015 to January 2016. 20 consecutive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who had AF ablation using the Bi-Bi technique were evaluated. Result: Mean age was 63, number of antiarrhythmic used prior to ablation was 1.4, mean left atrial size was 38 mm. Mean chads score was 1.3. Mean EF was 53%. Long delays in the left antral circumferential lines were achieved with mean delay of 142 milliseconds +/-100. Also long delays in the right antral circumferential lines were achieved with mean delay of 150 milliseconds +/-80. 95 % (19/20) of patients were free of any atrial arrhythmias and were off antiarrhythmic medications for AF post procedure. There was only one transient complication in one patient who developed a moderate pericardial effusion that was successfully drained with no hemodynamic changes. The only patient who had recurrence was found to have asymptomatic AF with burden on his device <1%, this patient was also found to have non PV triggers for his AF. In patients with only PV triggered AF success rate was 100%. Conclusion: Achievement of Bidirectional long delays in pulmonary vein antral lines prior to Bidirectional Block in patient with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is feasible and highly effective technique in this small cohort of patients studied. We also outlined the procedure in details.

Electrophysiological Evaluation of Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Since the pulmonary veins (PVs) were identified as a major source of AF triggers, ablation strategies targeting the PVs have evolved from focal ablation inside the PVs to wide area circumferential PV isolation (PVI) which at this juncture is the standard approach. Despite the widespread popularity of PVI, a universal definition is lacking. While "entrance block" is a generally accepted endpoint for PVI, the role of "exit block" has yet to be determined. Inexcitability of the circular ablation line has been introduced as a promising additional endpoint for PVI and was associated with an improved clinical outcome in a randomized trial. Correct interpretation of PV electrograms during an ablation procedure is critical in terms of efficacy and safety. A variety of electrophysiological techniques help to correctly differentiate components of complex PV electrograms. Resumption of PV conduction after initially successful PVI leading to AF recurrence remains a major problem and confirmation of bi-directional conduction block does not exclude reversible tissue damage along the ablation line. Prolongation of post-PVI monitoring and application of provocative procedures such as the administration of adenosine after initial PVI to unmask dormant PV conduction may improve clinical outcome although there is lack of valid data supporting these strategies. This article aims on clarifying the electrophysiological criteria for complete pulmonary vein isolation and the explain the importance of this cornerstone in almost all atrial fibrillation ablation procedures.

Impact of cardiac computed tomography of the interatrial septum before pulmonary vein isolation

BACKGROUND

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) may be useful to identify patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO). The aim of this study was to analyze whether a MDCT performed before pulmonary vein isolation reliably detects a PFO that may be used for access to the left atrium.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 79 consecutive patients, who were referred for catheter ablation of symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), the presence of a PFO was explored by MDCT and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). TEE was considered as the gold standard, and quality of TEE was good in all patients. In 16 patients (20.3%), MDCT could not be used for analysis because of artifacts, mainly because of AF. On TEE, a PFO was found in 15 (23.8%) of the 63 patients with usable MDCT. MDCT detected six PFO of which four were present on TEE. This corresponded to a sensitivity of 26.7%, a specificity of 95.8%, a negative predictive value of 80.7%, and a positive predictive value of 66.7%. The receiver operating characteristics curve of MDCT for the detection of PFO was 0.613 (95% confidence interval 0.493-0.732).

CONCLUSIONS

MDCT may detect a PFO before pulmonary isolation. However, presence of AF may lead to artifacts on MDCT impeding a meaningful analysis. Furthermore, in this study sensitivity and positive predictive value of MDCT were low and therefore MDCT was not a reliable screening tool for detection of PFO.

Lessons from dissociated pulmonary vein potentials: entry block implies exit block

Aims

Prior reports using pacing manoeuvres, demonstrated an up to 42% prevalence of residual pulmonary vein to left atrium (PV–LA) exit conduction after apparent LA–PV entry block. We aimed to determine in a two-centre study the prevalence of residual PV–LA exit conduction in the presence of unambiguously proven entry block and without pacing manoeuvres.

Methods and results

Of 378 patients, 132 (35%) exhibited spontaneous pulmonary vein (PV) potentials following circumferential PV isolation guided by three-dimensional mapping and a circular mapping catheter. Pulmonary vein automaticity was regarded as unambiguous proof of LA–PV entry block. We determined the prevalence of spontaneous exit conduction of the spontaneous PV potentials toward the LA. Pulmonary vein automaticity was observed in 171 PVs: 61 right superior PV, 33 right inferior PV, 47 left superior PV, and 30 left inferior PV. Cycle length of the PV automaticity was >1000 ms in all cases. Spontaneous PV–LA exit conduction was observed in one of 171 PVs (0.6%). In a subset of 69 PVs, pacing from within the PV invariably confirmed PVLA exit block.

Conclusion

Unidirectional block at the LA–PV junction is unusual (0.6%). This observation is supportive of LA–PV entry block as a sufficient electrophysiological endpoint for PV isolation.