Genetic Abnormalities of the Sinoatrial Node and Atrioventricular Conduction

The peculiar electrophysiological properties of the sinoatrial node and the cardiac conduction system are key components of the normal physiology of cardiac impulse generation and propagation. Multiple genes and transcription factors and metabolic proteins are involved in their development and regulation. In this review, we have summarized the genetic underlying causes, key clinical findings, and the latest available clinical evidence. We will discuss clinical diagnosis and management of the genetic conditions associated with conduction disorders that are more prevalent in clinical practice, for this reason, very rare genetic diseases presenting sinus node or cardiac conduction system abnormalities are not discussed.

An evaluation of 24 h Holter monitoring in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1

AIMS

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of routine 24 h Holter monitoring to screen for conduction disturbances and arrhythmias in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective two-centre study was conducted including DM1-affected individuals undergoing routine cardiac screening with at least one 24 h Holter monitoring between January 2010 and December 2020. For each individual, the following data were collected: Holter results, results of electrocardiograms (ECGs) performed at the same year as Holter monitoring, presence of cardiac complaints, and neuromuscular status. Holter findings were compared with the results of cardiac screening (ECG + history taking) performed at the same year. Cardiac conduction abnormalities and/or arrhythmias that would have remained undiagnosed based on history taking and ECG alone were considered de novo findings. A total 235 genetically confirmed DM1 patients were included. Abnormal Holter results were discovered in 126 (54%) patients after a mean follow-up of 64 ± 28 months in which an average of 3 ± 1 Holter recordings per patient was performed. Abnormalities upon Holter mainly consisted of conduction disorders (70%) such as atrioventricular (AV) block. Out of 126 patients with abnormal Holter findings, 74 (59%) patients had de novo Holter findings including second-degree AV block, atrial fibrillation/flutter and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. Patient characteristics were unable to predict the occurrence of de novo Holter findings. In 39 out of 133 (29%) patients with normal ECGs upon yearly cardiac screening, abnormalities were found on Holter monitoring during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Twenty-four hour Holter monitoring is of added value to routine cardiac screening for all DM1 patients.

An overview of heart rhythm disorders and management in myotonic dystrophy type 1

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is the most common adult form of muscular dystrophy, presenting with a constellation of systemic findings secondary to a CTG triplet expansion of the noncoding region of the DMPK gene. Cardiac involvement is frequent, with conduction disease and supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias being the most prevalent cardiac manifestations, often developing from a young age. The development of cardiac arrhythmias has been linked to increased morbidity and mortality, with sudden cardiac death well described. Strategies to mitigate risk of arrhythmic death have been developed. In this review, we outline the current knowledge on the pathophysiology of rhythm abnormalities in patients with myotonic dystrophy and summarize available knowledge on arrhythmic risk stratification. We also review management strategies from an electrophysiological perspective, attempting to underline the substantial unmet need to address residual arrhythmic risks for this population.

Paradoxical cardiac conduction during exercise stress testing in myotonic dystrophy type 1: a case report

Background 

Exercise stress testing (EST) identifies functional abnormalities that may manifest only during physiologic stress to the heart. This may have significant prognostic value in identifying latent conduction abnormalities in asymptomatic patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (MD1), who may benefit from prophylactic permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation.

Case report 

We report the case of a patient with MD1 with a 5-month history of atypical left-sided chest pain. Her baseline electrocardiogram (ECG) showed sinus rhythm and variable PR interval prolongation (206–220 ms) without symptoms of cardiac conduction disease. Routine blood tests and cardiac investigations including a 24-h ECG monitoring, echocardiogram, and a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging scan, revealed no abnormalities. To investigate her chest pain and to determine the need for prophylactic PPM implantation, EST and an electrophysiological study were performed. Exercise testing revealed minimal PR shortening (PR = 200 ms) at peak exercise and paradoxical PR prolongation (PR = 280 ms) during the early recovery period. A prophylactic DDDR PPM was implanted following an electrophysiological study that revealed a prolonged His-ventricle (HV) interval of 84 ms.

Discussion 

The current use of annual ECG and 24 Holter monitoring may not adequately detect abnormal cardiac conduction in asymptomatic patients with MD1. The invasive nature of electrophysiology studies limits its use as a screening tool for conduction abnormalities in asymptomatic patients. Thus, EST could be used to identify underlying conduction abnormalities in MD1 patients without any specific symptoms of bradycardia, which warrant further invasive electrophysiological studies (EPS).

Genetic Abnormalities of the Sinoatrial Node and Atrioventricular Conduction

The peculiar electrophysiological properties of the sinoatrial node and the cardiac conduction system are key components of the normal physiology of cardiac impulse generation and propagation. Multiple genes and transcription factors and metabolic proteins are involved in their development and regulation. In this review, we have summarized the genetic underlying causes, key clinical findings, and the latest available clinical evidence. We will discuss clinical diagnosis and management of the genetic conditions associated with conduction disorders that are more prevalent in clinical practice, for this reason, very rare genetic diseases presenting sinus node or cardiac conduction system abnormalities are not discussed.

Electrocardiographic predictors of infrahissian conduction disturbances in myotonic dystrophy type 1

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria predicting abnormal infrahissian conduction in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), as these criteria could be used to identify the need for an electrophysiological study (EPS).

Methods and results

A retrospective multicentre study was conducted including DM1-affected individuals who underwent EPS between 2007 and 2018. For each individual, EPS indication, His-ventricle (HV) interval, resting ECG parameters prior to EPS, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), neurological status, and DM1 DNA analysis results were collected. Electrocardiographic parameters of patients with a normal HV interval were compared with ECG parameters of patients with a prolonged HV interval. Logistic regression was performed to determine predictors for a prolonged HV interval of ≥70 ms on EPS and diagnostic accuracy of ECG parameters was ascertained. Among 100 DM1-affected individuals undergoing EPS, 47 had a prolonged HV interval. The sole presence of a PR interval >200 ms [odds ratio (OR) 8.45, confidence interval (CI) 2.64–27.04] or a QRS complex >120 ms (OR 9.91, CI 3.53–27.80) on ECG were independent predictors of a prolonged HV interval. The combination of both parameters had a positive predictive value of 78% for delayed infrahissian conduction on EPS. His-ventricle interval was independent of DM1 genetic mutation size, neuromuscular status, and LVEF.

Conclusion

The combination of a prolonged PR interval and widened QRS complex on ECG accurately predicts abnormal infrahissian conduction on EPS in patients with DM1. These ECG parameters could be used as a screening tool to determine the need for referral to a specialized multidisciplinary neuromuscular team with EPS capacity.

Clinical and genetic characteristics of childhood-onset myotonic dystrophy

INTRODUCTION

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is caused by a CTG (cytosine-thymine-guanine) trinucleotide repeat expansion. Congenital DM (CDM) presents in the first month of life, whereas individuals with infantile and juvenile DM1 have later onset of symptoms.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with childhood-onset DM1 seen at one of three locations in Dallas, Texas between 1990 and 2018. Symptoms, disease course, cognitive features, and family history were reviewed.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients were included; CDM was diagnosed in 52 patients. There was maternal inheritance in 74% of patients. CTG repeat number ranged from 143 to 2300. Neuropsychiatric and cognitive deficits were common. Over half of the patients had GI disturbances, and orthopedic complications were common.

DISCUSSION

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 in children requires a multidisciplinary approach to management. Presenting symptoms vary, and repeat expansion size does not necessarily directly relate to severity of symptoms. A consensus for outcome measures is required.

Twenty-four-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring relevancy in myotonic dystrophy type 1 follow-up: Prognostic value and heart rate variability evolution

BACKGROUND

Patient prognosis in type 1 myotonic dystrophy (DM1) is very poor. Annual 24-hour holter ECG monitoring is recommended but its relevance is debated. Main objective was to determine whether holter ECG parameters could predict global death in DM1 patients and secondarily to assess whether they could predict cardiovascular events and sudden cardiac death, to compare DM1 patients and healthy controls, and to assess their evolution in DM1 over a 5-year period.

METHODS

This retrospective study included genetically confirmed DM1. Primary endpoint was global death. Secondary endpoints were labeled "sudden cardiac death" which was a composite of sudden cardiac death, aborted sudden cardiac death, implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy, sustained ventricular tachycardia, atrioventricular block grade 3, pause >3 s; and "cardiovascular events" which was a composite of all-cause mortality, pacemaker or cardioverter defibrillator implantation, sustained ventricular tachycardia, supraventricular tachycardia, hospitalization for acute cardiac cause and heart failure.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients (22 women, 40 ± 13 years old) were included. Three (7%) DM1 patients died, 9 (19%) experienced "sudden cardiac death" endpoint and 21 (45%) experienced "cardiovascular event" endpoint during mean follow-up of 95 ± 22 months. None of holter ECG parameters were discriminant to predict death or secondary endpoints. Compared to healthy controls, DM1 patients had higher SDNN and LF/HF ratio. Finally, heart rate variability parameters remained stable over a mean interval of 61 ± 15 months excepting pNN50 which decreased significantly.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that annually-repeated holter ECG in DM1 is not useful for stratifying risk of sudden death and cardiovascular outcomes.

Signal-averaged electrocardiography: Past, present, and future

Signal-averaged electrocardiography records delayed depolarization of myocardial areas with slow conduction that can form the substrate for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. This technique has been examined mostly in patients with coronary artery disease, but its use has been declined over the years. However, several lines of evidence, derived from hitherto clinical data in patients with healed myocardial infarction, indicate that signal-averaged electrocardiography remains a valuable tool in risk stratification, especially when incorporated into algorithms encompassing invasive and noninvasive indices. Such an approach can aid the more precise identification of candidates for device therapy, in the context of primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. This article reappraises the value of signal-averaged electrocardiography as a predictor of arrhythmic outcome in patients with ischemic heart disease and discusses potential future indications.

The Frequency and Risk Factors for Ischemic Stroke in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 Patients

INTRODUCTION

Patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 have several cardiac abnormalities, especially myocardial conduction disorders. Few studies have investigated cerebral infarction. We investigated the frequency of both symptomatic and asymptomatic ischemic strokes in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1.

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed with myotonic dystrophy type 1 using genetic testing or clinical examinations at Asahikawa Medical Center were included. We retrospectively reviewed their medical history, neuroradiological imaging, electrocardiograms, and treatment. Their CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were calculated.

RESULT

A total of 108 patients were diagnosed with myotonic dystrophy type 1. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 72 and 1 patient whose results were not available was excluded. Among these, 2 patients had atrial flutter and 3 had atrial fibrillation. Regarding the CHADS2 score, 11 patients scored more than 2. Regarding the CHA2DS2-VASc score, 22 patients scored more than 2. Ischemic strokes were found in 9 patients with 1 having an atrial flutter and 4 having atrial fibrillation. All patients with stroke had CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores higher than 2. There were significant differences between the 2 groups in atrial fibrillation (P < .001), CHADS2 score (P < .001), and CHA2DS2-VASc score (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ischemic stroke in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 is associated with atrial fibrillation. The CHADS2 score seems to be useful for the management of patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1. Repeated electrocardiograms are necessary for managing these patients.

Myotonic dystrophy and the heart: A systematic review of evaluation and management

Myotonic dystrophy (MD) is a multisystem, autosomal dominant disorder best known for its skeletal muscle manifestations. Cardiac manifestations arise as a result of myocardial fatty infiltration, degeneration and fibrosis and present most commonly as arrhythmias or conduction disturbances. Guidelines regarding the optimal cardiac management of patients with MD are lacking. The present article provides a summary of the pathophysiology of cardiac problems in patients with MD and provides a practical approach to contemporary cardiac monitoring and management of these patients with a focus on the prevention of complications related to conduction disturbances and arrhythmias.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed and Medline. The keywords used in the search included "myotonic dystrophy", "cardiac manifestations", "heart", "arrhythmia", "pacemaker" and "defibrillator", all terms were used in combination. In addition, "myotonic dystrophy" was searched in conjunction with "electrophysiology", "electrocardiogram", "echocardiograph", "signal averaged electrocardiograph", "magnetic resonance imaging" and "exercise stress testing". The titles of all the articles revealed by the search were screened for relevance. The abstracts of relevant titles were read and those articles which concerned the cardiac manifestations of myotonic dystrophy or the investigation and management of cardiac manifestations underwent a full manuscript review.

Atrial flutter or fibrillation is the most frequent and life-threatening arrhythmia in myotonic dystrophy

BACKGROUND

Several arrhythmias were reported in myotonic dystrophy (MD).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) in MD and the clinical consequences.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-one patients, mean age 41 ± 14 years, were referred for a type 1 MD. All patients were asymptomatic except four patients and followed during 5 ± 4 years. Electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography assessing left ventricular ejection fraction, and Holter monitoring were obtained and repeated.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (17%) presented sustained (>1 hour) AF (n = 15) or AFL (n = 12); two of them presented syncope-related 1/1 AFL. In one of them, 16 years of age, cardiac defibrillator was implanted for a diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia, but the true diagnosis was established after inappropriate shocks. AFL ablation was performed in five patients, but four developed AF. The other seven patients with AFL developed AF. During the follow-up, 22 patients died (14%) from cardiac and respiratory failure; eight patients with AF/AFL died (30%) while only 14 without AF/AFL died (10%; P < 0.01). Univariate analysis indicated that age >40 years (death: 48 ± 14 vs 40 ± 8 in alive patients), abnormal ECG, and occurrence of AF/AFL were significant factors of death. At multivariate analysis, AF at ECG (odds ratio: 3.12) and age >40 (odds ratio: 3.14) were the sole independent variables predicting death.

CONCLUSIONS

AF and AFL were frequent in MD and increased mortality. AFL could present as 1/1 AFL with a poor tolerance and a risk of misdiagnosis despite frequent conduction disturbances. This arrhythmia could explain wide QRS tachycardia occurring in MD and interpreted as VT.

[A genetic systemic disease: clinical description of type 1 myotonic dystrophy in adults]

Type 1 myotonic dystrophy is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder related to the expansion of a trinucleotide (CTG) repeat in the exon 15 in the 3'-untranslated region of the myotonic dystrophy protein kinase (DMPK) gene. Mutant transcripts containing an expanded CUG repeat are retained in nuclear foci and cause numerous dysfunctions by interfering with biogenesis of other mRNAs. Prominent clinical features are progressive muscular weakness and myotonia, which affect skeletal muscles but also white muscles leading to digestive, urinary and obstetrical disorders. Functional prognosis correlates with motor handicap and vital prognosis is linked to cardiac rhythm disturbances and conduction defects due to progressive subendocardial fibrosis, and to complex respiratory dysfunctions, which associate restrictive lung disease, involvement of the central inspiratory pathway, and sleep apnea. Other clinical features are lens opacity, glucose intolerance, metabolic syndrome, several endocrine disorders (gonadal deficiency, hyperparathydoidism), or immunoglobulin deficiency due to immunoglobulin G hypercatabolism. Life expectancy is reduced in myotonic dystrophy, and death is mainly caused by respiratory complications, but also by cardiac arrhythmias. Moreover, an abnormal incidence of tumors has been reported. Therefore, myotonic dystrophy does not only concern neurologists but a multidisciplinary approach is necessary, including at least pneumologist, cardiologist, and physiotherapist. General internists should also be implicated, not only in the initial diagnosis step, but also in the diagnosis of complications and their treatments.