1
|
Sanders T, Fryer K, Greco M, Mooney C, Deary V, Burton C. Explanation for symptoms and biographical repair in a clinic for persistent physical symptoms. SSM. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN HEALTH 2024; 5:100438. [PMID: 38915733 PMCID: PMC11195018 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Biographical disruption describes the process by which illness impacts not just on a person's body and their participation in activities, but also on their sense of self. Biographical disruption is often followed by a process of biographical repair in which identity is reconstructed and a new normality is restored. People with persistent physical symptoms (sometimes referred to as medically unexplained symptoms) experience biographical disruption. This can be complicated by lack of explanation and the implication that if the problem is not medical, then it might be the person/psychological. We aimed to examine this tension in people attending a novel "Symptoms Clinic" for people with persistent physical symptoms. Methods This study reports an embedded qualitative study in a UK based randomised controlled trial. Data were collected by audio recordings of consultations and semi-structured interviews with patients. We used theoretically informed thematic analysis with regular coding and discussion meetings of the analysis team. This analysis explores the role of intervention components in facilitating biographical repair. Results The lack of acceptable explanation for persistent symptoms acted as a block to biographical repair. In the clinic, multi-layered explanations were offered and negotiated that viewed persistent symptoms as understandable entities rather than as indicators of something still hidden. These explanations allowed study participants to make sense of their symptoms and in turn opened new opportunities for self-management. The result was that participants were able to reframe their symptoms in a way that enabled them to see themselves differently. Even if symptoms had not yet improved, there was a sense of being better. This can be understood as a process of biographical repair. Conclusion Explaining persistent physical symptoms enables biographical repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Sanders
- Department of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Northumbria Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK
| | - Kate Fryer
- Division of Population Health, Sam Fox House, Northern General Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK
| | - Monica Greco
- Department of Social and Policy Sciences, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY
| | - Cara Mooney
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School for Health & Related Research, University of Sheffield, Innovation Centre, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Vincent Deary
- Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Northumbria Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK
| | - Christopher Burton
- Division of Population Health, Sam Fox House, Northern General Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nilou FE, Christoffersen NB, Lian OS, Guassora AD, Broholm-Jørgensen M. Conceptualizing negotiation in the clinical encounter - A scoping review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 121:108134. [PMID: 38199175 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Negotiation as an analytical concept in research about clinical encounters is vague. We aim to provide a conceptual synthesis of key characteristics of the process of negotiation in clinical encounters based on a scoping review. METHODS We conducted a scoping review of relevant literature in Embase, Psych Info, Global Health and SCOPUS. We included 25 studies from 1737 citations reviewed. RESULTS We found that the process of negotiation is socially situated depending on the individual patient and professional, a dynamic element of the interaction that may occur both tacitly and explicitly at all stages of the encounter and is not necessarily tied to a specific health problem. Hence, negotiation is complex and influenced by both social, biomedical, and temporal contexts. CONCLUSIONS We found that negotiation between patient and health professional occurs at all stages of the clinical encounter. Negotiation is influenced by social, temporal, and biomedical contexts that encompass the social meeting between patient and health professional. We suggest that health professionals strive to be attentive to patients' tacit negotiation practices. This will strengthen the recognition of the patients' actual wishes for their course of treatment which can thus guide the health professionals' recommendations and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Freja Ekstrøm Nilou
- National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Olaug S Lian
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Ann Dorrit Guassora
- Section and Research Unit of General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lesnewich LM, Hyde JK, McFarlin ML, Bolton RE, Bayley PJ, Chandler HK, Helmer DA, Phillips LA, Reinhard MJ, Santos SL, Stewart RS, McAndrew LM. 'She thought the same way I that I thought:' a qualitative study of patient-provider concordance among Gulf War Veterans with Gulf War Illness. Psychol Health 2023:1-19. [PMID: 37654203 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2023.2248481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
Objective: Medically unexplained symptoms (MUS), such as chronic fatigue syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, and Gulf War Illness (GWI), are difficult to treat. Concordance-shared understanding between patient and provider about illness causes, course, and treatment-is an essential component of high-quality care for people with MUS. This qualitative paper focuses on the experiences of United States military Veterans living with GWI who have endured unique healthcare challenges. Methods & Measures: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 31 Veterans with GWI to explore factors that contribute to and detract from concordance with their Veteran Affairs (VA) healthcare providers. In addition to being seen by VA primary care, over half of participants also sought care at a War Related Illness and Injury Study Center, which specializes in post-deployment health. Deductive and inductive codes were used to organize the data, and themes were identified through iterative review of coded data. Results: Major themes associated with patient-provider concordance included validation of illness experiences, perceived provider expertise in GWI/MUS, and trust in providers. Invalidation, low provider expertise, and distrust detracted from concordance. Conclusion: These findings suggest providers can foster concordance with MUS patients by legitimizing patients' experiences, communicating knowledge about MUS, and establishing trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M Lesnewich
- War Related Illness and Injury Study Center (WRIISC), Veterans Affairs New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, NJ, USA
| | - Justeen K Hyde
- Department of Medicine, Section General Internal Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, USA
| | | | - Rendelle E Bolton
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, USA
- The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Peter J Bayley
- War Related Illness and Injury Study Center (WRIISC), Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Helena K Chandler
- War Related Illness and Injury Study Center (WRIISC), Veterans Affairs New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, NJ, USA
| | - Drew A Helmer
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness & Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - L Alison Phillips
- War Related Illness and Injury Study Center (WRIISC), Veterans Affairs New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, NJ, USA
- Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, IA, USA
| | - Matthew J Reinhard
- War Related Illness and Injury Study Center (WRIISC), Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA high-quality
| | - Susan L Santos
- War Related Illness and Injury Study Center (WRIISC), Veterans Affairs New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, NJ, USA
| | - Rachel S Stewart
- War Related Illness and Injury Study Center (WRIISC), Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA high-quality
| | - Lisa M McAndrew
- War Related Illness and Injury Study Center (WRIISC), Veterans Affairs New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, NJ, USA
- University at Albany, State University of New York (SUNY), Albany, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mooney C, White DA, Dawson J, Deary V, Fryer K, Greco M, Horspool M, Neilson A, Rowlands G, Sanders T, Thomas RE, Thomas S, Waheed W, Burton CD. Study protocol for the Multiple Symptoms Study 3: a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial of a clinic for patients with persistent (medically unexplained) physical symptoms. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e066511. [PMID: 36379663 PMCID: PMC9668014 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Persistent physical symptoms (which cannot be adequately attributed to physical disease) affect around 1 million people (2% of adults) in the UK. They affect patients' quality of life and account for at least one third of referrals from General Practitioners (GPs) to specialists. These referrals give patients little benefit but have a real cost to health services time and diagnostic resources. The symptoms clinic has been designed to help people make sense of persistent physical symptoms (especially if medical tests have been negative) and to reduce the impact of symptoms on daily life. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial will assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the symptoms clinic intervention plus usual care compared with usual care alone. Patients were identified through GP searches and mail-outs and recruited by the central research team. 354 participants were recruited and individually randomised (1:1). The primary outcome is the self-reported Physical Health Questionnaire-15 at 52 weeks postrandomisation. Secondary outcome measures include the EuroQol 5 dimension 5 level and healthcare resource use. Outcome measures will also be collected at 13 and 26 weeks postrandomisation. A process evaluation will be conducted including consultation content analysis and interviews with participants and key stakeholders. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval has been obtained via Greater Manchester Central Research Ethics Committee (Reference 18/NW/0422). The results of the trial will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals, presented at relevant conferences and disseminated to trial participants and patient interest groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN57050216.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara Mooney
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - David Alexander White
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jeremy Dawson
- Sheffield University Management School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Kate Fryer
- Academic Unit of Primary Medical Care, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Monica Greco
- Department of Sociology, Goldsmiths University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Aileen Neilson
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh Division of Medical and Radiological Sciences, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Gillian Rowlands
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Institute for Health and Society, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Tom Sanders
- Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ruth E Thomas
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT) Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Steve Thomas
- NHS Sheffield Clinical Commissioning Group, Sheffield, UK
| | - Waquas Waheed
- Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Christopher D Burton
- Academic Unit of Primary Medical Care, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Affiliation(s)
- Heike Künzel
- Psychosomatische Beratungsstelle / Ambulanz, Klinikum Innenstadt d. LMU München, Pettenkoferstraße 8 a, 80336, München, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
den Boer C, Terluin B, van der Wouden JC, Blankenstein AH, van der Horst HE. Experiences of general practitioners explaining central sensitisation to patients with persistent physical symptoms: a focus group study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e060063. [PMID: 35882464 PMCID: PMC9330311 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with persistent physical symptoms (PPS) require an explanation that is acceptable and comprehensible to them. Central sensitisation (CS) is an explanatory model for PPS and chronic pain that has been broadly applied in the context of pain medicine, but, until recently, not by general practitioners (GPs). We explored how GPs used the CS model in their consultations with patients with PPS. DESIGN AND SETTING A qualitative focus group study among GPs in the Netherlands. METHODS We instructed 33 GPs on how to explain CS to patients with PPS. After 0.5-1.5 years of using the CS model, 26 GPs participated in focus groups and interviews to report and discuss their experiences with CS as an explanatory model. Audio recordings were transcribed and two researchers independently analysed the data. The text was coded, codes were organised into themes and discussed until consensus was reached. RESULTS We identified eleven themes and grouped these into four categories.The GPs regarded the CS model as evidence-based, credible and giving recognition to the patient. On the other hand, they found explaining the CS model difficult and time-consuming. They tailored the CS model to their patients' needs and used multiple consultations to explain the model. The GPs reported that the use of the CS model seemed to improve the understanding and acceptance of the symptoms by the patients and seemed to reduce their need for more diagnostic tests. Furthermore, patients seemed to become more motivated to accept appropriate therapy. CONCLUSION GPs reported that they were able to provide explanations with the CS model to their patients with PPS. They regarded the model as evidence-based, credible and giving recognition to the patient, but explaining it difficult and time-consuming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carine den Boer
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of General Practice, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Berend Terluin
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of General Practice, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes C van der Wouden
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of General Practice, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annette H Blankenstein
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of General Practice, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henriëtte E van der Horst
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of General Practice, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van Wietmarschen HA, van Velthoven K, Hummelen HJ, Lamers H, Elens R, van Rooijen R, de Klyn B, Zeegers M, Barthels R, Jansen JP, Kocken J, Lugten R, de Rijk EJ, Hertog KD, Robinson A, de Sonnaville M, Kusse F. Dutch Integrative Medicine physicians can improve quality of life of patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms - a cross-sectional observational study. Eur J Integr Med 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eujim.2022.102140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
8
|
Polakovská L, Řiháček T. What is it like to live with medically unexplained physical symptoms? A qualitative meta-summary. Psychol Health 2021; 37:580-596. [PMID: 33872098 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2021.1901900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) are a frequent phenomenon. Understanding adults and adolescents' lived experience with MUPS is essential for providing adequate care, yet a rigorous synthesis of existing studies is missing. Objective: This study aimed to summarize findings from primary qualitative studies focused on adults' and adolescents' experience of living with MUPS. Design: Qualitative studies were searched in the PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, and Medline databases and manually. A total of 23 resources met the inclusion criteria and were subjected to a qualitative meta-summary. Results: Eight themes were found across the set of primary studies, namely, the need to feel understood, struggling with isolation, 'sense of self' in strain, facing uncertainty, searching for explanations, ambivalence about diagnosis, disappointed by healthcare, and active coping. Conclusion: The eight themes represent the core struggles adults' and adolescents' with MUPS face in their lives, psychologically and socially. Although these themes appear to be universal, the analysis also revealed considerable variability of experience in terms of expectations from healthcare professionals, attitude towards formal diagnoses, ability to cope with the illness, or potential to transform the illness experience into personal growth. Addressing this diversity of needs represents a significant challenge for the healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Polakovská
- Faculty of Social Studies, Department of Psychology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Tomáš Řiháček
- Faculty of Social Studies, Department of Psychology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Leaviss J, Davis S, Ren S, Hamilton J, Scope A, Booth A, Sutton A, Parry G, Buszewicz M, Moss-Morris R, White P. Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24:1-490. [PMID: 32975190 PMCID: PMC7548871 DOI: 10.3310/hta24460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The term 'medically unexplained symptoms' is used to cover a wide range of persistent bodily complaints for which adequate examination and appropriate investigations do not reveal sufficiently explanatory structural or other specified pathologies. A wide range of interventions may be delivered to patients presenting with medically unexplained symptoms in primary care. Many of these therapies aim to change the behaviours of the individual who may have worsening symptoms. OBJECTIVES An evidence synthesis to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms delivered in primary care settings was undertaken. Barriers to and facilitators of the effectiveness and acceptability of these interventions from the perspective of patients and service providers were evaluated through qualitative review and realist synthesis. DATA SOURCES Full search strategies were developed to identify relevant literature. Eleven electronic sources were searched. Eligibility criteria - for the review of clinical effectiveness, randomised controlled trials were sought. For the qualitative review, UK studies of any design were included. For the cost-effectiveness review, papers were restricted to UK studies reporting outcomes as quality-adjusted life-year gains. Clinical searches were conducted in November 2015 and December 2015, qualitative searches were conducted in July 2016 and economic searches were conducted in August 2016. The databases searched included MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO and EMBASE. Updated searches were conducted in February 2019 and March 2019. PARTICIPANTS Adult participants meeting the criteria for medically unexplained symptoms, including somatoform disorders, chronic unexplained pain and functional somatic syndromes. INTERVENTIONS Behavioural interventions were categorised into types. These included psychotherapies, exercise-based interventions, multimodal therapies (consisting of more than one intervention type), relaxation/stretching/social support/emotional support, guided self-help and general practitioner interventions, such as reattribution. Evidence synthesis: a network meta-analysis was conducted to allow a simultaneous comparison of all evaluated interventions in a single coherent analysis. Separate network meta-analyses were performed at three time points: end of treatment, short-term follow-up (< 6 months since the end of treatment) and long-term follow-up (≥ 6 months after the end of treatment). Outcomes included physical and psychological symptoms, physical functioning and impact of the illness on daily activities. Economic evaluation: within-trial estimates of cost-effectiveness were generated for the subset of studies where utility values (or quality-adjusted life-years) were reported or where these could be estimated by mapping from Short Form questionnaire-36 items or Short Form questionnaire-12 items outcomes. RESULTS Fifty-nine studies involving 9077 patients were included in the clinical effectiveness review. There was a large degree of heterogeneity both between and within intervention types, and the networks were sparse across all outcomes. At the end of treatment, behavioural interventions showed some beneficial effects when compared with usual care, in particular for improvement of specific physical symptoms [(1) pain: high-intensity cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBTHI) standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.54 [95% credible interval (CrI) 0.28 to 0.84], multimodal SMD 0.52 (95% CrI 0.19 to 0.89); and (2) fatigue: low-intensity cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBTLI) SMD 0.72 (95% CrI 0.27 to 1.21), relaxation/stretching/social support/emotional support SMD 0.87 (95% CrI 0.20 to 1.55), graded activity SMD 0.51 (95% CrI 0.14 to 0.93), multimodal SMD 0.52 (95% CrI 0.14 to 0.92)] and psychological outcomes [(1) anxiety CBTHI SMD 0.52 (95% CrI 0.06 to 0.96); (2) depression CBTHI SMD 0.80 (95% CrI 0.26 to 1.38); and (3) emotional distress other psychotherapy SMD 0.58 (95% CrI 0.05 to 1.13), relaxation/stretching/social support/emotional support SMD 0.66 (95% CrI 0.18 to 1.28) and sport/exercise SMD 0.49 (95% CrI 0.03 to 1.01)]. At short-term follow-up, behavioural interventions showed some beneficial effects for specific physical symptoms [(1) pain: CBTHI SMD 0.73 (95% CrI 0.10 to 1.39); (2) fatigue: CBTLI SMD 0.62 (95% CrI 0.11 to 1.14), relaxation/stretching/social support/emotional support SMD 0.51 (95% CrI 0.06 to 1.00)] and psychological outcomes [(1) anxiety: CBTHI SMD 0.74 (95% CrI 0.14 to 1.34); (2) depression: CBTHI SMD 0.93 (95% CrI 0.37 to 1.52); and (3) emotional distress: relaxation/stretching/social support/emotional support SMD 0.82 (95% CrI 0.02 to 1.65), multimodal SMD 0.43 (95% CrI 0.04 to 0.91)]. For physical functioning, only multimodal therapy showed beneficial effects: end-of-treatment SMD 0.33 (95% CrI 0.09 to 0.59); and short-term follow-up SMD 0.78 (95% CrI 0.23 to 1.40). For impact on daily activities, CBTHI was the only behavioural intervention to show beneficial effects [end-of-treatment SMD 1.30 (95% CrI 0.59 to 2.00); and short-term follow-up SMD 2.25 (95% CrI 1.34 to 3.16)]. Few effects remained at long-term follow-up. General practitioner interventions showed no significant beneficial effects for any outcome. No intervention group showed conclusive beneficial effects for measures of symptom load (somatisation). A large degree of heterogeneity was found across individual studies in the assessment of cost-effectiveness. Several studies suggested that the interventions produce fewer quality-adjusted life-years than usual care. For those interventions that generated quality-adjusted life-year gains, the mid-point incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) ranged from £1397 to £129,267, but, where the mid-point ICER fell below £30,000, the exploratory assessment of uncertainty suggested that it may be above £30,000. LIMITATIONS Sparse networks meant that it was not possible to conduct a metaregression to explain between-study differences in effects. Results were not consistent within intervention type, and there were considerable differences in characteristics between studies of the same type. There were moderate to high levels of statistical heterogeneity. Separate analyses were conducted for three time points and, therefore, analyses are not repeated-measures analyses and do not account for correlations between time points. CONCLUSIONS Behavioural interventions showed some beneficial effects for specific medically unexplained symptoms, but no one behavioural intervention was effective across all medically unexplained symptoms. There was little evidence that these interventions are effective for measures of symptom load (somatisation). General practitioner-led interventions were not shown to be effective. Considerable heterogeneity in interventions, populations and sparse networks mean that results should be interpreted with caution. The relationship between patient and service provider is perceived to play a key role in facilitating a successful intervention. Future research should focus on testing the therapeutic effects of the general practitioner-patient relationship within trials of behavioural interventions, and explaining the observed between-study differences in effects within the same intervention type (e.g. with more detailed reporting of defined mechanisms of the interventions under study). STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42015025520. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 46. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Leaviss
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sarah Davis
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Shijie Ren
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jean Hamilton
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alison Scope
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Anthea Sutton
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Glenys Parry
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Marta Buszewicz
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London Medical School, London, UK
| | | | - Peter White
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stortenbeker I, Stommel W, van Dulmen S, Lucassen P, Das E, Olde Hartman T. Linguistic and interactional aspects that characterize consultations about medically unexplained symptoms: A systematic review. J Psychosom Res 2020; 132:109994. [PMID: 32179304 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.109994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Revised: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The apparent absence of any specific underlying diseases challenges patient-provider communication about medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). Previous research focused on general communication patterns in these interactions; however, an overview of more detailed interactional and linguistic aspects is lacking. This review aims to gain a detailed understanding of communicative challenges in MUS consultations by synthesizing evidence from conversation and discourse analytic research. METHODS A systematic review of publications using eight databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Web of Science, MLA International Bibliography, LLBA and Communication Abstracts). Search terms included 'MUS', 'linguistics' and 'communication'. Additional studies were identified by contacting experts and searching bibliographies. We included linguistic and/or interactional analyses of natural patient-provider interactions about MUS. Two authors independently extracted the data, and quality appraisal was based on internal and external validity. RESULTS We identified 18 publications that met the inclusion criteria. The linguistic and interactional features of MUS consultations pertained to three dimensions: 1) symptom recognition, 2) double trouble potential (i.e. patients and providers may have differing views on symptoms and differing knowledge domains), and 3) negotiation and persuasion (in terms of acceptable explanations and subsequent psychological treatment). We describe the recurrent linguistic and interactional features of these interactions. CONCLUSIONS Despite the presence of a double trouble potential in MUS consultations, validation of symptoms and subtle persuasive conduct may facilitate agreement on illness models and subsequent (psychological) treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge Stortenbeker
- Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Wyke Stommel
- Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands; Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.
| | - Peter Lucassen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Enny Das
- Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Tim Olde Hartman
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tobback E, Mariman A, Clauwaert L, Godderis L, Heytens S, Ruppol P, Spooren D, Tytgat R, De Muynck M, Vogelaers D. Opinion paper: the role of work in the management of medically unexplained physical symptoms. Acta Clin Belg 2019; 74:151-156. [PMID: 29726743 DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2018.1462754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms suffer from chronic fatigue and/or pain in combination with a variety of other symptoms. A flexible, biopsychosocial approach is needed for diagnostic screening and global management. It is crucial to involve the direct patient environment, including family, friends, colleagues as well as health providers, evaluation, and reintegration sector. The aim of this paper is to review the importance of work in the management of medically unexplained physical symptoms. METHODS In this paper, different actors involved explain their views and handling concerning work in the management of MUPS. RESULTS Symptom severity and lack of understanding from the environment can negatively impact on earning an independent income from labor for years. Work, whether or not paid, is however, an important life domain with positive effects on physical, psychological, and social well-being. Therefore, health actors are pivotal in starting the professional reintegration process as soon as possible and should discuss this item from the early stage onward. Support services can be consulted in mutual interaction as required. A case manager, acting as a central intermediator within this multidisciplinary approach, may promote effective communication and coordination between the patients and their surrounding actors. CONCLUSION The professional reintegration process should start as soon as possible within the management of medically unexplained physical symptoms. As such, the care sector, the evaluation sector, and the professional integration sector should collaborate and effectively communicate with each other.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Els Tobback
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - An Mariman
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lies Clauwaert
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lode Godderis
- Department of Occupational, Environmental and Insurance Medicine, Catholic University Louvain, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Stefan Heytens
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Patrick Ruppol
- Service for Specialized Guidance for Persons with Special Needs GTB, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Daniel Spooren
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Rita Tytgat
- Medical Department of the Christian Sickness Fund, Christian Sickness Fund, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Martine De Muynck
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Dirk Vogelaers
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Stortenbeker IA, Houwen J, Lucassen PLBJ, Stappers HW, Assendelft WJJ, van Dulmen S, Olde Hartman TC, Das E. Quantifying positive communication: Doctor's language and patient anxiety in primary care consultations. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2018; 101:1577-1584. [PMID: 29751948 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2017] [Revised: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 05/01/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Positive communication is advocated for physicians during consultations with patients presenting medically unexplained symptoms (MUS), but studies generally focus on what is said rather than how it is said. This study quantified language use differences of general practitioners (GPs), and assessed their relation to patient anxiety. METHODS Language use of 18 Dutch GPs during 82 consultations was compared for patients with MUS versus medically explained symptoms (MES). Message content (positive or negative) was differentiated from its directness (direct or indirect), and related to changes in patient's state anxiety (abbreviated State Trait Anxiety Inventory; STAI). RESULTS In total, 2590 clauses were identified. GPs approached patients with MES with relatively more direct (vs. indirect) positive and indirect (vs. direct) negative messages (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.42-2.59). Anxiety of both patient groups increased when GPs used more direct (vs. indirect) negative messages (b = 0.67, 95% CI 0.07-1.27) CONCLUSIONS: GPs use different language depending on the content of messages for patients with MES, but not MUS. Direct negative messages relate to an increase in patient anxiety. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS GPs could manage patient's state anxiety by expressing negative messages in an indirect rather than direct manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Juul Houwen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Peter L B J Lucassen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Hugo W Stappers
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Willem J J Assendelft
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; NIVEL (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, the Netherlands; Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University College of Southeast Norway, Drammen, Norway.
| | - Tim C Olde Hartman
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Enny Das
- Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|