1
|
van Baal K, Hemmerling M, Stahmeyer JT, Stiel S, Afshar K. End-of-life care in Germany between 2016 and 2020 - A repeated cross-sectional analysis of statutory health insurance data. BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23:105. [PMID: 38643167 PMCID: PMC11031961 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01387-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Hospice and Palliative Care Act of 2015 aimed at developing and regulating the provision of palliative care (PC) services in Germany. As a result of the legal changes, people with incurable diseases should be enabled to experience their final stage of life including death according to their own wishes. However, it remains unknown whether the act has impacted end-of-life care (EoLC) in Germany. OBJECTIVE The present study examined trends in EoLC indicators for patients who died between 2016 and 2020, in the context of Lower Saxony, Germany. METHODS Repeated cross-sectional analysis was conducted on data from the statutory health insurance fund AOK Lower Saxony (AOK-LS), referring to the years 2016-2020. EoLC indicators were: (1) the number of patients receiving any form of outpatient PC, (2) the number of patients receiving generalist outpatient PC and (3) specialist outpatient PC in the last year of life, (4) the onset of generalist outpatient PC and (5) the onset of specialist outpatient PC before death, (6) the number of hospitalisations in the 6 months prior to death and (7) the number of days spent in hospital in the 6 months prior to death. Data for each year were analysed descriptively and a comparison between 2016 and 2020 was carried out using t-tests and chi-square tests. RESULTS Data from 160,927 deceased AOK-LS members were analysed. The number of patients receiving outpatient PC remained almost consistent over time (2016 vs. 2020 p = .077). The number of patients receiving generalist outpatient PC decreased from 28.4% (2016) to 24.5% (2020; p < .001), whereas the number of patients receiving specialist outpatient PC increased from 8.5% (2016) to 11.2% (2020; p < .001). The onset of generalist outpatient PC moved from 106 (2016) to 93 days (2020; p < .001) before death, on average. The onset of specialist outpatient PC showed the reverse pattern (2016: 55 days before death; 2020: 59 days before death; p = .041). CONCLUSION Despite growing needs for PC at the end of life, the number of patients receiving outpatient PC did not increase between 2016 and 2020. Furthermore, specialist outpatient PC is being increasingly prescribed over generalist outpatient PC. Although the early initiation of outpatient PC has been proven valuable for the majority of people at the end of life, generalist outpatient PC was not initiated earlier in the disease trajectory over the study period, as was found to be true for specialist outpatient PC. Future studies should seek to determine how existing PC needs can be optimally met within the outpatient sector and identify factors that can support the earlier initiation of especially generalist outpatient PC. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study "Optimal Care at the End of Life" was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00015108; 22 January 2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina van Baal
- Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Melissa Hemmerling
- AOK Lower Saxony, Department for Health Services Research, Hildesheimer Str. 273, 30519, Hannover, Germany
| | - Jona Theodor Stahmeyer
- AOK Lower Saxony, Department for Health Services Research, Hildesheimer Str. 273, 30519, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stiel
- Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Kambiz Afshar
- Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Blanes-Selva V, Asensio-Cuesta S, Doñate-Martínez A, Pereira Mesquita F, García-Gómez JM. User-centred design of a clinical decision support system for palliative care: Insights from healthcare professionals. Digit Health 2023; 9:20552076221150735. [PMID: 36644661 PMCID: PMC9837281 DOI: 10.1177/20552076221150735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Although clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have many benefits for clinical practice, they also have several barriers to their acceptance by professionals. Our objective in this study was to design and validate The Aleph palliative care (PC) CDSS through a user-centred method, considering the predictions of the artificial intelligence (AI) core, usability and user experience (UX). Methods We performed two rounds of individual evaluation sessions with potential users. Each session included a model evaluation, a task test and a usability and UX assessment. Results The machine learning (ML) predictive models outperformed the participants in the three predictive tasks. System Usability Scale (SUS) reported 62.7 ± 14.1 and 65 ± 26.2 on a 100-point rating scale for both rounds, respectively, while User Experience Questionnaire - Short Version (UEQ-S) scores were 1.42 and 1.5 on the -3 to 3 scale. Conclusions The think-aloud method and including the UX dimension helped us to identify most of the workflow implementation issues. The system has good UX hedonic qualities; participants were interested in the tool and responded positively to it. Performance regarding usability was modest but acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicent Blanes-Selva
- Biomedical Data Science Lab, Instituto Universitarios de Tecnologías de La Información y Comunicaciones (ITACA), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain,Vicent Blanes-Selva, Biomedical Data Science Lab, Instituto Universitarios de Tecnologías de La Información y Comunicaciones (ITACA), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, 46022, Spain.
| | - Sabina Asensio-Cuesta
- Biomedical Data Science Lab, Instituto Universitarios de Tecnologías de La Información y Comunicaciones (ITACA), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Felipe Pereira Mesquita
- Divisão de Hematologia, departamento de Clínica Médica, da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brasil
| | - Juan M. García-Gómez
- Biomedical Data Science Lab, Instituto Universitarios de Tecnologías de La Información y Comunicaciones (ITACA), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ijaopo EO, Zaw KM, Ijaopo RO, Khawand-Azoulai M. A Review of Clinical Signs and Symptoms of Imminent End-of-Life in Individuals With Advanced Illness. Gerontol Geriatr Med 2023; 9:23337214231183243. [PMID: 37426771 PMCID: PMC10327414 DOI: 10.1177/23337214231183243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: World population is not only aging but suffering from serious chronic illnesses, requiring an increasing need for end-of-life care. However, studies show that many healthcare providers involved in the care of dying patients sometimes express challenges in knowing when to stop non-beneficial investigations and futile treatments that tend to prolong undue suffering for the dying person. Objective: To evaluate the clinical signs and symptoms that show end-of-life is imminent in individuals with advanced illness. Design: Narrative review. Methods: Computerized databases, including PubMed, Embase, Medline,CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Google Scholar were searched from 1992 to 2022 for relevant original papers written in or translated into English language that investigated clinical signs and symptoms of imminent death in individuals with advanced illness. Results: 185 articles identified were carefully reviewed and only those that met the inclusion criteria were included for review. Conclusion: While it is often difficult to predict the timing of death, the ability of healthcare providers to recognize the clinical signs and symptoms of imminent death in terminally-ill individuals may lead to earlier anticipation of care needs and better planning to provide care that is tailored to individual's needs, and ultimately results in better end-of-life care, as well as a better bereavement adjustment experience for the families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Khin Maung Zaw
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, FL, USA
- Miami VA Medical Center, FL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Afshar K, van Baal K, Wiese B, Schleef T, Stiel S, Müller-Mundt G, Schneider N. Structured implementation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool in general practice - A prospective interventional study with follow-up. Palliat Care 2022; 21:214. [PMID: 36451172 PMCID: PMC9714240 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-022-01107-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND General practitioners (GPs) play a key role in the provision of primary palliative care (PC). The identification of patients who might benefit from PC and the timely initiation of patient-centred PC measures at the end of life are essential, yet challenging. Although different tools exist to support these key tasks, a structured approach is often missing. OBJECTIVE The study aimed at implementing the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE™) in general practices, following a structured and regional approach, in order to evaluate the effects of this tool on the identification of patients with potential PC needs and the initiation of patient-centred PC measures. METHODS The intervention of this mixed-methods study comprised a standardised training of 52 GPs from 34 general practices in two counties in Lower Saxony, Germany, on the use of the SPICT-DE™. The SPICT-DE™ is a clinical tool which supports the identification of patients with potential PC needs. Subsequently, over a period of 12 months, GPs applied the SPICT-DE™ in daily practice with adult patients with chronic, progressive diseases, and completed a follow-up survey 6 months after the initial patient assessment. The outcome parameters were alterations in the patient's clinical situation, and the type and number of initiated patient-centred PC measures during the follow-up interval. Additionally, 12 months after the standardised training, GPs provided feedback on their application of the SPICT-DE™. RESULTS A total of 43 GPs (n = 15 female, median age 53 years) out of an initial sample of 52 trained GPs assessed 580 patients (n = 345 female, median age 84 years) with mainly cardiovascular (47%) and cancer (33%) diseases. Follow-up of 412 patients revealed that 231 (56%) experienced at least one critical incident in their disease progression (e.g. acute crisis), 151 (37%) had at least one hospital admission, and 141 (34%) died. A review of current treatment/medication (76%) and a clarification of treatment goals (53%) were the most frequently initiated patient-centred PC measures. The majority of GPs deemed the SPICT-DE™ practical (85%) and stated an intention to continue applying the tool in daily practice (66%). CONCLUSIONS The SPICT-DE™ is a practical tool that supports the identification of patients at risk of deterioration or dying and promotes the initiation of patient-centred PC measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (N° DRKS00015108; 22/01/2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kambiz Afshar
- grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Katharina van Baal
- grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Birgitt Wiese
- grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Tanja Schleef
- grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stiel
- grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Gabriele Müller-Mundt
- grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Nils Schneider
- grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Baal K, Wiese B, Müller-Mundt G, Stiel S, Schneider N, Afshar K. Quality of end-of-life care in general practice – a pre–post comparison of a two-tiered intervention. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2022; 23:90. [PMID: 35443614 PMCID: PMC9022313 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01689-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Background General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in the provision of end-of-life care (EoLC). The present study aimed at comparing the quality of GPs’ EoLC before and after an intervention involving a clinical decision aid and a public campaign. Methods The study was part of the larger interventional study ‘Optimal care at the end of life’ (OPAL) (Innovation Fund, Grant No. 01VSF17028). The intervention lasted 12 months and comprised two components: (1) implementation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE™) in general practice and (2) a public campaign in two German counties to inform and connect regional health care providers and stakeholders in EoLC. Participating GPs completed the General Practice End of Life Care Index (GP-EoLC-I) pre- (t0) and post- (t1) intervention. The GP-EoLC-I (25 items, score range: 14–40) is a self-assessment questionnaire that measures the quality of GPs’ EoLC. It includes two subscales: practice organisation and clinical practice. Data were analysed descriptively, and a paired t-test was applied for the pre–post comparison. Results Forty-five GPs (female: 29%, median age: 57 years) from 33 general practices participated in the intervention and took part in the survey at both times of measurement (t0 and t1). The mean GP-EoLC-I score (t0 = 27.9; t1 = 29.8) increased significantly by 1.9 points between t0 and t1 (t(44) = − 3.0; p = 0.005). Scores on the practice organisation subscale (t0 = 6.9; t1 = 7.6) remained almost similar (t(44) = -2.0; p = 0.057), whereas those of the clinical practice subscale (t0 = 21.0; t1 = 22.2) changed significantly between t0 and t1 (t(44) = -2.6; p = 0.011). In particular, items regarding the record of care plans, patients’ preferred place of care at the end of life and patients’ preferred place of death, as well as the routine documentation of impending death, changed positively. Conclusions GPs’ self-assessed quality of EoLC seemed to improve after a regional intervention that involved both the implementation of the SPICT-DE™ in daily practice and a public campaign. In particular, improvement related to the domains of care planning and documentation. Trial registration The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00015108; 22/01/2019).
Collapse
|
6
|
Leniz J, Gulliford M, Higginson IJ, Bajwah S, Yi D, Gao W, Sleeman KE. Primary care contacts, continuity, identification of palliative care needs, and hospital use: a population-based cohort study in people dying with dementia. Br J Gen Pract 2022; 72:BJGP.2021.0715. [PMID: 35817583 PMCID: PMC9282808 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reducing hospital admissions among people dying with dementia is a policy priority. AIM To explore associations between primary care contacts, continuity of primary care, identification of palliative care needs, and unplanned hospital admissions among people dying with dementia. DESIGN AND SETTING This was a retrospective cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked with hospital records and Office for National Statistics data. Adults (>18 years) who died between 2009 and 2018 with a diagnosis of dementia were included in the study. METHOD The association between GP contacts, Herfindahl-Hirschman Index continuity of care score, palliative care needs identification before the last 90 days of life, and multiple unplanned hospital admissions in the last 90 days was evaluated using random-effects Poisson regression. RESULTS In total, 33 714 decedents with dementia were identified: 64.1% (n = 21 623) female, mean age 86.6 years (SD 8.1), mean comorbidities 2.2 (SD 1.6). Of these, 1894 (5.6%) had multiple hospital admissions in the last 90 days of life (increase from 4.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.2 to 5.6 in 2009 to 7.1%, 95% CI = 5.7 to 8.4 in 2018). Participants with more GP contacts had higher risk of multiple hospital admissions (incidence risk ratio [IRR] 1.08, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.11). Higher continuity of care scores (IRR 0.79, 95% CI = 0.68 to 0.92) and identification of palliative care needs (IRR 0.66, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.78) were associated with lower frequency of these admissions. CONCLUSION Multiple hospital admissions among people dying with dementia are increasing. Higher continuity of care and identification of palliative care needs are associated with a lower risk of multiple hospital admissions in this population, and might help prevent these admissions at the end of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javiera Leniz
- NIHR clinician scientist and honorary consultant in palliative medicine, Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London
| | - Martin Gulliford
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Science & Medicine, King's College London, London
| | - Irene J Higginson
- NIHR clinician scientist and honorary consultant in palliative medicine, Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London
| | - Sabrina Bajwah
- NIHR clinician scientist and honorary consultant in palliative medicine, Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London
| | - Deokhee Yi
- NIHR clinician scientist and honorary consultant in palliative medicine, Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London
| | - Wei Gao
- NIHR clinician scientist and honorary consultant in palliative medicine, Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London
| | - Katherine E Sleeman
- NIHR clinician scientist and honorary consultant in palliative medicine, Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van Baal K, Schrader S, Schneider N, Wiese B, Stiel S, Afshar K. [End-of-life care in a rural small-town region in Lower Saxony: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis based on routinely collected general practice data]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ, FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAT IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2022; 168:48-56. [PMID: 34998676 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Up to 90% of people at the end of life are in need of palliative care. The majority can be cared for within general outpatient palliative care (AAPV) by general practitioners. Previous studies have described outpatient palliative care to fall short behind the estimated needs and to be initiated rather late in the health care process. Yet, little is known about the development of outpatient palliative care in recent years and about the parameters influencing its utilisation. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the number and time of initiation for AAPV and specialised outpatient palliative care (SAPV) in a rural and small-town region in Lower Saxony on the basis of routinely collected general practice data. Furthermore, this study sought to estimate the influence of various parameters related to patients, practices and physicians on the provision of AAPV and SAPV. METHODS All general practitioners (n=190) in two counties in Lower Saxony were invited to take part in the project "Optimal care at the end of life - OPAL" (Innovation Fund, 01VSF17028) between autumn 2018 and spring 2019. In the participating practices, clinical data pertaining to patients with statutory health insurance, who had died in the second or third quarter of 2018, were collected in pseudonymised form and analysed using selected indicators for end-of-life care. The number of hospital stays and the provision of AAPV and SAPV were the subject of the descriptive analyses. In order to take the cluster effect of the practices into account, mixed-model analyses were carried out. RESULTS The data of 279 deceased patients (48% female; median age 82 years) from 31 general practices were analysed. In the last year of life, AAPV was provided for 78 deceased patients (28.0%) with a median onset of 20 days before death. 52 deceased patients (18.6%) received SAPV with a median onset of 28 days before death, respectively. In the last six months of life, 207 deceased patients (74.2%) were hospitalised at least once. The mixed-model analyses showed a greater probability of receiving AAPV (odds ratio (OR)=3.3) or SAPV (OR=3.2) in the last year of life for patients with oncological diseases. It was also shown that GPs with a higher value on the subscale practice organisation billed more AAPV (OR=1.4). DISCUSSION The number of patients with SAPV is at least equivalent to the estimated needs known from the literature in both selected regions. In contrast, AAPV seems to be provided relatively rarely and rather late in the health care process. Relevant reasons for this may be the lack of concrete criteria for AAPV (e. g., ambiguities and competing codes for billing) as well as prognostic uncertainties of health care providers especially for patients with non-oncological diseases. CONCLUSION Strategies to further develop end-of-life care should especially strengthen the AAPV provided by general practitioners and focus on patients with non-oncological diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina van Baal
- Institut für Allgemeinmedizin und Palliativmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.
| | - Sophie Schrader
- Institut für Allgemeinmedizin und Palliativmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Nils Schneider
- Institut für Allgemeinmedizin und Palliativmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Birgitt Wiese
- Institut für Allgemeinmedizin und Palliativmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Stephanie Stiel
- Institut für Allgemeinmedizin und Palliativmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Kambiz Afshar
- Institut für Allgemeinmedizin und Palliativmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pocock LV, Purdy S, Barclay S, Murtagh FEM, Selman LE. Communication of poor prognosis between secondary and primary care: protocol for a systematic review with narrative synthesis. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e055731. [PMID: 34949630 PMCID: PMC9066345 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION People dying in Britain spend, on average, 3 weeks of their last year of life in hospital. Hospital discharge presents an opportunity for secondary care clinicians to communicate to general practitioners (GPs) which patients may have a poor prognosis. This would allow GPs to prioritise these patients for Advance Care Planning.The objective of this study is to produce a critical overview of research on the communication of poor prognosis between secondary and primary care through a systematic review and narrative synthesis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will search Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Social Sciences Citation Index for all study types, published since 1 January 2000, and conduct reference-mining of systematic reviews and publications. Study quality will be assessed using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool; a narrative synthesis will be undertaken to integrate and summarise findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Approval by research ethics committee is not required since the review only includes published and publicly accessible data. Review findings will inform a qualitative study of the sharing of poor prognosis at hospital discharge. We will publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal as per Preferred Reporting for Systematic review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidance. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD42021236087.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy V Pocock
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Stephen Barclay
- General Practice Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fliss E M Murtagh
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Lucy E Selman
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Leniz J, Higginson IJ, Yi D, Ul-Haq Z, Lucas A, Sleeman KE. Identification of palliative care needs among people with dementia and its association with acute hospital care and community service use at the end-of-life: A retrospective cohort study using linked primary, community and secondary care data. Palliat Med 2021; 35:1691-1700. [PMID: 34053356 PMCID: PMC8532216 DOI: 10.1177/02692163211019897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospital admissions among people dying with dementia are common. It is not known whether identification of palliative care needs could help prevent unnecessary admissions. AIM To examine the proportion of people with dementia identified as having palliative care needs in their last year of life, and the association between identification of needs and primary, community and hospital services in the last 90 days. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study using Discover, an administrative and clinical dataset from 365 primary care practices in London with deterministic individual-level data linkage to community and hospital records. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS People diagnosed with dementia and registered with a general practitioner in North West London (UK) who died between 2016 and 2019. The primary outcome was multiple non-elective hospital admissions in the last 90 days of life. Secondary outcomes included contacts with primary and community care providers. We examined the association between identification of palliative care needs with outcomes. RESULTS Among 5804 decedents with dementia, 1953 (33.6%) were identified as having palliative care needs, including 1141 (19.7%) identified before the last 90 days of life. Identification of palliative care needs before the last 90 days was associated with a lower risk of multiple hospital admissions (Relative Risk 0.70, 95% CI 0.58-0.85) and more contacts with the primary care practice, community nurses and palliative care teams in the last 90 days. CONCLUSIONS Further investigation of the mechanisms underlying the association between identification of palliative care needs and reduced hospital admissions could help reduce reliance on acute care for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javiera Leniz
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Irene J Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Deokhee Yi
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Zia Ul-Haq
- Discover-Now, Imperial College Health Partners, London, UK
| | - Amanda Lucas
- Discover-Now, Imperial College Health Partners, London, UK
| | - Katherine E Sleeman
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sommer J, Chung C, Haller DM, Pautex S. Shifting palliative care paradigm in primary care from better death to better end-of-life: a Swiss pilot study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:629. [PMID: 34193128 PMCID: PMC8245274 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06664-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients suffering from advanced cancer often loose contact with their primary care physician (PCP) during oncologic treatment and palliative care is introduced very late. The aim of this pilot study was to test the feasibility and procedures for a randomized trial of an intervention to teach PCPs a palliative care approach and communication skills to improve advanced cancer patients' quality of life. METHODS Observational pilot study in 5 steps. 1) Recruitment of PCPs. 2) Intervention: training on palliative care competencies and communication skills addressing end-of-life issues. 3) Recruitment of advanced cancer patients by PCPs. 4) Patients follow-up by PCPs, and assessment of their quality of life by a research assistant 5) Feedback from PCPs using a semi-structured focus group and three individual interviews with qualitative deductive theme analysis. RESULTS Eight PCPs were trained. Patient recruitment was a challenge for PCPs who feared to impose additional loads on their patients. PCPs became more conscious of their role and responsibility during oncologic treatments and felt empowered to take a more active role picking up patient's cues and addressing advance directives. They developed interprofessional collaborations for advance care planning. Overall, they discovered the role to help patients to make decisions for a better end-of-life. CONCLUSIONS While the intervention was acceptable to PCPs, recruitment was a challenge and a follow up trial was not deemed feasible using the current design but PCPs reported a change in paradigm about palliative care. They moved from a focus on helping patients to die better, to a new role helping patients to define the conditions for a better end-of-life. TRIAL REGISTRATION The ethics committee of the canton of Geneva approved the study (2018-00077 Pilot Study) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Sommer
- Faculty of Medicine Geneva, University Institute of Primary Care, University of Geneva, Centre Médical Universitaire, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1211, Genève 4, Switzerland
| | - Christopher Chung
- Faculty of Medicine Geneva, University Institute of Primary Care, University of Geneva, Centre Médical Universitaire, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1211, Genève 4, Switzerland
| | - Dagmar M. Haller
- Faculty of Medicine Geneva, University Institute of Primary Care, University of Geneva, Centre Médical Universitaire, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1211, Genève 4, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pocock L, Morris R, French L, Purdy S. Underutilisation of EPaCCS (Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems) in end-of life-care: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2021:bmjspcare-2020-002798. [PMID: 33837112 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To support greater personalisation of end-of-life care, Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems (EPaCCS) have been implemented across England. Here, we describe patient factors associated with dying with an EPaCCS record and explore the association between having an EPaCCS record with cause and place of death. METHOD This is a cross-sectional study using routinely collected data. Data were extracted from primary care records in 20 of 86 general practices within one Clinical Commissioning Group in England. All deaths (n=1723) recorded between 22 February 2018 and 21 February 2019 were included to determine whether the deceased patient had an EPaCCS record at the time of death, a range of demographic factors, place of death and cause of death. RESULTS Only 18% of the sample died with an EPaCCS record, and people who died of a non-cancer cause were less likely to have an EPaCCS record than those who died of cancer (OR=0.41; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.55). Adjusting for patient demographic factors and cause of death, having an EPaCCS record was strongly associated with dying in the community (OR=5.10; 95% CI 3.70 to 7.03). CONCLUSIONS A small proportion of this sample died with an EPaCCS record, despite evidence of an association with dying in the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Pocock
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Richard Morris
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Lydia French
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mapping end-of-life and anticipatory medications in palliative care patients using a longitudinal general practice database. Palliat Support Care 2021; 20:94-100. [PMID: 33750494 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951521000092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE End-of-life and anticipatory medications (AMs) have been widely used in various health care settings for people approaching end-of-life. Lack of access to medications at times of need may result in unnecessary hospital admissions and increased patient and family distress in managing palliative care at home. The study aimed to map the use of end-of-life and AM in a cohort of palliative care patients through the use of the Population Level Analysis and Reporting Data Space and to discuss the results through stakeholder consultation of the relevant organizations. METHODS A retrospective observational cohort study of 799 palliative care patients in 25 Australian general practice health records with a palliative care referral was undertaken over a period of 10 years. This was followed by stakeholders' consultation with palliative care nurse practitioners and general practitioners who have palliative care patients. RESULTS End-of-life and AM prescribing have been increasing over the recent years. Only a small percentage (13.5%) of palliative care patients received medications through general practice. Stakeholders' consultation on AM prescribing showed that there is confusion about identifying patients needing medications for end-of-life and mixed knowledge about palliative care referral pathways. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS Improved knowledge and information around referral pathways enabling access to palliative care services for general practice patients and their caregivers are needed. Similarly, the increased utility of screening tools to identify patients with palliative care needs may be useful for health care practitioners to ensure timely care is provided.
Collapse
|
13
|
Sampey L, Finucane AM, Spiller J. Shared electronic care coordination systems following referral to hospice. Br J Community Nurs 2021; 26:58-62. [PMID: 33539245 DOI: 10.12968/bjcn.2021.26.2.58] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
In Scotland, the Key Information Summary (KIS) enables health providers to access key patient information to guide decision-making out-of-hours. KISs are generated in primary care and rely on information from other teams, such as community specialist palliative care teams (CSPCTs), to keep them up-to-date. This study involved a service evaluation consisting of case note reviews of new referrals to a CSPCT and semi-structured interviews with palliative care community nurse specialists (CNSs) regarding their perspectives on KISs. Some 44 case notes were examined, and 77% of patients had a KIS on CSPCT referral. One-month post-referral, all those re-examined (n=17) had a KIS, and 59% KISs had been updated following CNS assessments. CNSs cited anticipatory care planning (ACP) as the most useful aspect of KIS, and the majority of CNSs said they would appreciate KIS editing access. A system allowing CNSs to update KISs would be acceptable to CNSs, as it could facilitate care co-ordination and potentially improve comprehensiveness of ACP information held in KISs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Libby Sampey
- Foundation Year 1 Doctor, NHS Lothian, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh
| | - Anne M Finucane
- Research Lead and Honorary Research Fellow, Marie Curie Hospice Edinburgh; Usher Institute University of Edinburgh
| | - Juliet Spiller
- Consultant in Palliative Medicine, Marie Curie Hospice Edinburgh
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
van Baal K, Schrader S, Schneider N, Wiese B, Stahmeyer JT, Eberhard S, Geyer S, Stiel S, Afshar K. Quality indicators for the evaluation of end-of-life care in Germany - a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of statutory health insurance data. BMC Palliat Care 2020; 19:187. [PMID: 33292204 PMCID: PMC7724721 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-020-00679-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The provision and quality of end-of-life care (EoLC) in Germany is inconsistent. Therefore, an evaluation of current EoLC based on quality indicators is needed. This study aims to evaluate EoLC in Germany on the basis of quality indicators pertaining to curative overtreatment, palliative undertreatment and delayed palliative care (PC). Results were compared with previous findings. Methods Data from a statutory health insurance provider (AOK Lower Saxony) pertaining to deceased members in the years 2016 and 2017 were used to evaluate EoLC. The main indicators were: chemotherapy for cancer patients in the last month of life, first-time percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) for patients with dementia in the last 3 months of life, number of hospitalisations and days spent in inpatient treatment in the last 6 months of life, and provision of generalist and specialist outpatient PC in the last year of life. Data were analysed descriptively. Results Data for 64,275 deceased members (54.3% female; 35.1% cancer patients) were analysed. With respect to curative overtreatment, 10.4% of the deceased with cancer underwent chemotherapy in the last month and 0.9% with dementia had a new PEG insertion in the last 3 months of life. The mean number of hospitalisations and inpatient treatment days per deceased member was 1.6 and 16.5, respectively, in the last 6 months of life. Concerning palliative undertreatment, generalist outpatient PC was provided for 28.0% and specialist outpatient PC was provided for 9.0% of the deceased. Regarding indicators for delayed PC, the median onset of generalist and specialist outpatient PC was 47.0 and 24.0 days before death, respectively. Conclusion Compared to data from 2010 to 2014, the data analysed in the present study suggest an ongoing curative overtreatment in terms of chemotherapy and hospitalisation, a reduction in new PEG insertions and an increase in specialist PC. The number of patients receiving generalist PC remained low, with delayed onset. Greater awareness of generalist PC and the early integration of PC are recommended. Trial registration The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00015108; 22 January 2019). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-020-00679-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina van Baal
- Institute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Sophie Schrader
- Institute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Nils Schneider
- Institute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Birgitt Wiese
- Institute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Jona Theodor Stahmeyer
- AOK Lower Saxony, Department for Health Services Research, Hildesheimer Str. 273, 30519, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sveja Eberhard
- AOK Lower Saxony, Department for Health Services Research, Hildesheimer Str. 273, 30519, Hannover, Germany
| | - Siegfried Geyer
- Medical Sociology Unit, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stiel
- Institute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Kambiz Afshar
- Institute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Eaton-Williams P, Barrett J, Mortimer C, Williams J. A national survey of ambulance paramedics on the identification of patients with end of life care needs. Br Paramed J 2020; 5:8-14. [PMID: 33456392 PMCID: PMC7783960 DOI: 10.29045/14784726.2020.12.5.3.8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Developing the proactive identification of patients with end of life care (EoLC) needs within ambulance paramedic clinical practice may improve access to care for patients not benefitting from EoLC services at present. To inform development of this role, this study aims to assess whether ambulance paramedics currently identify EoLC patients, are aware of identification guidance and believe this role is appropriate for their practice. METHODS Between 4 November 2019 and 5 January 2020, registered paramedics from nine English NHS ambulance service trusts were invited to complete an online questionnaire. The questionnaire initially explored current practice and awareness, employing multiple-choice questions. The Gold Standards Framework Proactive Identification Guidance (GSF PIG) was then presented as an example of EoLC assessment guidance, and further questions, permitting free-text responses, explored attitudes towards performing this role. RESULTS 1643 questionnaires were analysed. Most participants (79.9%; n = 1313) perceived that they attended a patient who was unrecognised as within the last year of life on at least a monthly basis. Despite 72.0% (n = 1183) of paramedics indicating that they had previously made an EoLC referral to a General Practitioner, only 30.5% (n = 501) were familiar with the GSF PIG and of those only 25.9% (n = 130) had received training in its use. Participants overwhelmingly believed that they could (94.4%; n = 1551) and should (97.0%; n = 1594) perform this role, yet current barriers were identified as the inaccessibility of a patient's medical records, inadequate EoLC education and communication difficulties. Consequently, facilitators to performing this role were identified as the provision of training in EoLC assessment guidance and establishing accessible, responsive EoLC referral pathways. CONCLUSIONS Provision of EoLC assessment training and dedicated EoLC referral pathways should facilitate ambulance paramedics' roles in the timely recognition of EoLC patients, potentially addressing current inequalities in access to EoLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Eaton-Williams
- South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust: ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5664-3329
| | - Jack Barrett
- South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust: ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0040-537X
| | - Craig Mortimer
- South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust: ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6989-2244
| | - Julia Williams
- South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust; Paramedic Clinical Research Unit (ParaCRU), University of Hertfordshire: ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0796-5465
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Timing of GP end-of-life recognition in people aged ≥75 years: retrospective cohort study using data from primary healthcare records in England. Br J Gen Pract 2020; 70:e874-e879. [PMID: 33139331 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20x713417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2020] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-quality, personalised palliative care should be available to all, but timely recognition of end of life may be a barrier to end-of-life care for older people. AIM To investigate the timing of end-of-life recognition, palliative registration, and the recording of end-of-life preferences in primary care for people aged ≥75 years. DESIGN AND SETTING Retrospective cohort study using national primary care record data, covering 34% of GP practices in England. METHOD ResearchOne data from electronic healthcare records (EHRs) of people aged ≥75 years who died in England between 1 January 2015 and 1 January 2016 were examined. Clinical codes relating to end-of-life recognition, palliative registration, and end-of-life preferences were extracted, and the number of months that elapsed between the code being entered and death taking place were calculated. The timing for each outcome and proportion of relevant EHRs were reported. RESULTS Death was recorded for a total of 13 149 people in ResearchOne data during the 1-year study window. Of those, 6303 (47.9%) records contained codes suggesting end of life had been recognised at a point in time prior to the month of death. Recognition occurred ≥12 months before death in 2248 (17.1%) records. In total, 1659 (12.6%) people were on the palliative care register and 457 (3.5%) were on the register for ≥12 months before death; 2987 (22.7%) records had a code for the patient's preferred place of care, and 1713 (13.0%) had a code for the preferred place of death. Where preferences for place of death were recorded, a care, nursing, or residential home (n = 813, 47.5%) and the individual's home (n = 752, 43.9%) were the most common. CONCLUSION End-of-life recognition in primary care appears to occur near to death and for only a minority of people aged ≥75 years. The findings suggest that older people's deaths may not be anticipated by health professionals, compromising equitable access to palliative care.
Collapse
|
17
|
The difference an end-of-life diagnosis makes: qualitative interviews with providers of community health care for frail older people. Br J Gen Pract 2020; 70:e757-e764. [PMID: 32958536 PMCID: PMC7510843 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20x712805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing numbers of people die of the frailty and multimorbidity associated with old age, often without receiving an end-of-life diagnosis. Compared to those with a single life-limiting condition such as cancer, frail older people are less likely to access adequate community care. To address this inequality, guidance for professional providers of community health care encourages them to make end-of-life diagnoses more often in such people. These diagnoses centre on prognosis, making them difficult to establish given the inherent unpredictability of age-related decline. This difficulty makes it important to ask how care provision is affected by not having an end-of-life diagnosis. AIM To explore the role of an end-of-life diagnosis in shaping the provision of health care outside acute hospitals. DESIGN AND SETTING Qualitative interviews with 19 healthcare providers from community-based settings, including nursing homes and out-of-hours services. METHOD Semi-structured interviews (nine individual, three small group) were conducted. Data were analysed thematically and using constant comparison. RESULTS In the participants' accounts, it was unusual and problematic to consider frail older people as candidates for end-of-life diagnosis. Participants talked of this diagnosis as being useful to them as care providers, helping them prioritise caring for people diagnosed as 'end-of-life' and enabling them to offer additional services. This prioritisation and additional help was identified as excluding people who die without an end-of-life diagnosis. CONCLUSION End-of-life diagnosis is a first-class ticket to community care; people who die without such a diagnosis are potentially disadvantaged as regards care provision. Recognising this inequity should help policymakers and practitioners to mitigate it.
Collapse
|
18
|
Thomas HR, Deckx L, Sieben NA, Foster MM, Mitchell GK. General practitioners' considerations when deciding whether to initiate end-of-life conversations: a qualitative study. Fam Pract 2020; 37:554-560. [PMID: 31796956 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmz088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND End-of-life discussions often are not initiated until close to death, even in the presence of life-limiting illness or frailty. Previous research shows that doctors may not explicitly verbalize approaching end-of-life in the foreseeable future, despite shifting their focus to comfort care. This may limit patients' opportunity to receive information and plan for the future. General Practitioners (GPs) have a key role in caring for increasing numbers of patients approaching end-of-life. OBJECTIVE To explore GPs' thought processes when deciding whether to initiate end-of-life discussions. METHODS A qualitative approach was used. We purposively recruited 15 GPs or GP trainees from South-East Queensland, Australia, and each participated in a semi-structured interview. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Australian GPs believe they have a responsibility to initiate end-of-life conversations, and identify several triggers to do so. Some also describe caution in raising this sensitive topic, related to patient, family, cultural and personal factors. CONCLUSIONS These findings enable the development of approaches to support GPs to initiate end-of-life discussions that are cognizant both of GPs' sense of responsibility for these discussions, and factors that may contribute to caution initiating them, such as anticipated patient response, cultural considerations, societal taboos, family dynamics and personal challenges to doctors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley R Thomas
- Primary Care Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
| | - Laura Deckx
- Primary Care Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
| | - Nicolas A Sieben
- Primary Care Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
| | - Michele M Foster
- The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Woolloongabba, Australia
| | - Geoffrey K Mitchell
- Primary Care Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Radionova N, Becker G, Mayer-Steinacker R, Gencer D, Rieger MA, Preiser C. The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care. BMC Palliat Care 2020; 19:45. [PMID: 32247316 PMCID: PMC7129326 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-020-00554-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Patients in oncological and palliative care (PC) often have complex needs, which require a comprehensive treatment approach. The assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been shown to improve identification of patient needs and foster adjustment of treatment. This study explores occupational routines, attitudes and expectations of physicians and nurses with regards to a planned electronic assessment system of PROs. Methods Ten physicians and nine nurses from various PC settings in Southern Germany were interviewed. The interviews were analysed with qualitative content analysis. Results The interviewees were sceptical about the quality of data generated through a patient self-assessment system. They criticised the rigidity of the electronic assessment questionnaire, which the interviewees noted may not fit the profile of all palliative patients. They feared the loss of personal contact between medical staff and patients and favoured in-person conversation and on-site observations on site over the potential system. Interviewees saw potential in being able to discover unseen needs from some patients. Interviewees evaluated the system positively in the case that the system served to broadly orient care plans without affecting or reducing the patient-caregiver relationship. Conclusions A significant portion of the results touch upon the symbolic acceptance of the suggested system, which stands for an increasing standardisation and technisation of medicine where interpersonal contact and the professional expertise are marginalized. The study results can provide insight for processes and communication in the run-up to and during the implementation of electronic assessment systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Radionova
- Institute for Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tuebingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, D-72074, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Gerhild Becker
- Clinic for Palliative Care, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Centre University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Deniz Gencer
- Department of Medicine III, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Monika A Rieger
- Institute for Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tuebingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, D-72074, Tuebingen, Germany.,Core Facility Health Services Research, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Christine Preiser
- Institute for Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tuebingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, D-72074, Tuebingen, Germany.,Core Facility Health Services Research, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|