1
|
Baxter H, Bearne L, Stone T, Thomas C, Denholm R, Redwood S, Purdy S, Huntley AL. The effectiveness of knowledge-sharing techniques and approaches in research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR): a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst 2024; 22:41. [PMID: 38566127 PMCID: PMC10988883 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01127-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR), funds, enables and delivers world-leading health and social care research to improve people's health and wellbeing. To achieve this aim, effective knowledge sharing (two-way knowledge sharing between researchers and stakeholders to create new knowledge and enable change in policy and practice) is needed. To date, it is not known which knowledge sharing techniques and approaches are used or how effective these are in creating new knowledge that can lead to changes in policy and practice in NIHR funded studies. METHODS In this restricted systematic review, electronic databases [MEDLINE, The Health Management Information Consortium (including the Department of Health's Library and Information Services and King's Fund Information and Library Services)] were searched for published NIHR funded studies that described knowledge sharing between researchers and other stakeholders. One researcher performed title and abstract, full paper screening and quality assessment (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist) with a 20% sample independently screened by a second reviewer. A narrative synthesis was adopted. RESULTS In total 9897 records were identified. After screening, 17 studies were included. Five explicit forms of knowledge sharing studies were identified: embedded models, knowledge brokering, stakeholder engagement and involvement of non-researchers in the research or service design process and organisational collaborative partnerships between universities and healthcare organisations. Collectively, the techniques and approaches included five types of stakeholders and worked with them at all stages of the research cycle, except the stage of formation of the research design and preparation of funding application. Seven studies (using four of the approaches) gave examples of new knowledge creation, but only one study (using an embedded model approach) gave an example of a resulting change in practice. The use of a theory, model or framework to explain the knowledge sharing process was identified in six studies. CONCLUSIONS Five knowledge sharing techniques and approaches were reported in the included NIHR funded studies, and seven studies identified the creation of new knowledge. However, there was little investigation of the effectiveness of these approaches in influencing change in practice or policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Baxter
- Evidence and Dissemination, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Twickenham, United Kingdom.
- National Institute for Health and Care Research, Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC WEST), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
| | - Lindsay Bearne
- Evidence and Dissemination, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Twickenham, United Kingdom
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tracey Stone
- National Institute for Health and Care Research, Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC WEST), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Thomas
- National Institute for Health and Care Research, Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC WEST), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research, Health Protection Research Unit in Behaviour Science and Evaluation (NIHR HPRU BSE), University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Denholm
- National Institute for Health and Care Research, Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR BRC), University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Sabi Redwood
- National Institute for Health and Care Research, Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC WEST), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Alyson Louise Huntley
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Creavin ST, Fish M, Lawton M, Cullum S, Bayer A, Purdy S, Ben-Shlomo Y. A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Study Investigating General Practitioner Clinical Impression and Brief Cognitive Assessments for Dementia in Primary Care, Compared to Specialized Assessment. J Alzheimers Dis 2023; 95:1189-1200. [PMID: 37694368 PMCID: PMC7615275 DOI: 10.3233/jad-230320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many health systems are interested in increasing the number of uncomplicated and typical dementia diagnoses that are made in primary care, but the comparative accuracy of tests is unknown. OBJECTIVE Calculate diagnostic accuracy of brief cognitive tests in primary care. METHODS We did a diagnostic test accuracy study in general practice, in people over 70 years who had consulted their GP with cognitive symptoms but had no prior diagnosis of dementia. The reference standard was specialist assessment, adjudicated for difficult cases, according to ICD-10. We assessed 16 index tests at a research clinic, and additionally analyzed referring GPs clinical judgement. RESULTS 240 participants had a median age of 80 years, of whom 126 were men and 132 had dementia. Sensitivity of individual tests at the recommended thresholds ranged from 56% for GP judgement (specificity 89%) to 100% for MoCA (specificity 16%). Specificity of individual tests ranged from 4% for Sniffin' sticks (sensitivity 100%) to 91% for Timed Up and Go (sensitivity 23%). The 95% centile of test duration in people with dementia ranged from 3 minutes for 6CIT and Time and Change, to 16 minutes for MoCA. Combining tests with GP judgement increased test specificity and decreased sensitivity: e.g., MoCA with GP Judgement had specificity 87% and sensitivity 55%. CONCLUSIONS Using GP judgement to inform selection of tests was an efficient strategy. Using IQCODE in people who GPs judge as having dementia and 6CIT in people who GPs judge as having no dementia, would be a time-efficient and accurate diagnostic assessment.The original protocol for the study is available at https://bmcfampract.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12875-016-0475-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Thomas Creavin
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS
| | | | - Michael Lawton
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS
| | - Sarah Cullum
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Building 507, 22-30 Park Avenue, Grafton, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
| | - Antony Bayer
- Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF64 2XX
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS
| | - Yoav Ben-Shlomo
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kong HY, Purdy S, Fox D, Patel P, Bandobranski S, Syed H. Pharmacist intervention in cardiovascular disease prevention: lipid modifying treatment optimisation in type 2 diabetes within hastings primary care network. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/ijpp/riac089.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) leads to 1 in 4 premature deaths with higher likelihood in the most deprived population1. Consistent data demonstrated efficacy of statins in CVD prevention and mortality reduction through modifying lipid profile1,2. NICE:CG181 recommends high-intensity statin, namely atorvastatin 20mg daily in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) with high risk of developing CVD1, whilst the European Society of Cardiology suggests LDL-C target below 1.4mmol/L, the lower the better 2. In contrast, 30% of patients in Hastings Primary Care Network (PCN) are prescribed sub-optimal statin therapy3 with scope to promote medicine optimisation through modification of CVD risk factor in one of the England’s most deprived areas.
Aim
Lowering patient’s CVD risk through optimising statin therapy and improving practice’s compliance with NICE:CG181.
Methods
NHS Health Research Authority Decision tool was followed, ethics approval was not required. Statin prescribing data were obtained through OpenPrescribing database. This pilot study focused on the prescribing of simvastatin at one surgery within the PCN where patients were identified using the surgery medical information system with the inclusion clinical codes of: “T2DM”, “QRISK2>10%”, “latest LDL-C>1.4mmol/L” and “current simvastatin 10/20/40mg prescription”. Systematic review of patient medical records was followed, including medical history, latest lipid profile and liver function, allergies, history of statin intolerance, previous lipid therapy and frailty status determined using the electronic frailty index, Rockwood score and medical notes. Patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia diagnosis, confirmed statin intolerance and moderately-to-severely frail were excluded. Patients were contacted to exercise shared decision-making. Once intervention agreed, prescription was initiated for prescriber authorisation. Blood test 3 months post-intervention monitored for liver function and lipid profile.
Results
Search in February 2022 identified 44 patients with 39 suitable for intervention after exclusion. Thirty-six contactable patients were all switched to high-intensity statin. Thirty-four were switched to atorvastatin 20 mg whilst two with prior atorvastatin intolerance were switched to rosuvastatin 10 mg. At baseline, 32 patients (88%) had cholesterol profile done within a year as per NICE:CG181. Three-month post-intervention blood tests were completed for 21, with 15 pending; 33% (7/21) had a reduction of LDL-C.
In February 2022, 28.9% of the practice’s statin prescriptions were of low and medium intensity and was reduced to 25.6% post intervention.
Discussion/Conclusion
All contactable patients had statin therapy optimised after exercising shared decision-making with improvement of prescribing compliance to NICE:CG181 demonstrated in this practice. Findings were inconclusive whether the intensification of statin therapy demonstrated cholesterol lowering effect in this cohort. Study limitations due to small sample size, currency of baseline profile at time of intervention and patient compliance not measured. Raised LDL-C observed could have been influenced by lifestyle changes such as poor diet and lack of exercise1. The limitations of this study will be reviewed for future roll out across Hastings PCN. Further exploration of therapy compliance, lifestyle education and the barriers to regular blood test would facilitate such medicine optimisation intervention. In conclusion, patients prescribed with sub-optimal lipid therapy should be reviewed and managed through healthy lifestyle recommendations and aggressive pharmacological intervention.
References
1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification, CG181. 2016 [cited 2022 Jul 27]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg181
2. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Konskinas CK, Casula M, Badimon L, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk: the task force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Eur Heart J [Internet]. 2019 Aug [cited 2022 Jul 27]. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/41/1/111/5556353#207091308 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455
3. OpenPrescribing.net. Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science. University of Oxford. [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 30]. Available from: https://openprescribing.net/measure/statinintensity/pcn/U99438/
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Y Kong
- East Sussex Healthcare Trust
- Hastings & St Leonards Primary Care Network
| | - S Purdy
- East Sussex Healthcare Trust
| | - D Fox
- Hastings & St Leonards Primary Care Network
- High Glade Medical Centre
| | - P Patel
- NHS Sussex Integrated Care Board
| | - S Bandobranski
- Hastings & St Leonards Primary Care Network
- High Glade Medical Centre
| | - H Syed
- East Sussex Healthcare Trust
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Scantlebury A, Adamson J, Salisbury C, Brant H, Anderson H, Baxter H, Bloor K, Cowlishaw S, Doran T, Gaughan J, Gibson A, Gutacker N, Leggett H, Purdy S, Voss S, Benger JR. Do general practitioners working in or alongside the emergency department improve clinical outcomes or experience? A mixed-methods study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e063495. [PMID: 36127084 PMCID: PMC9490584 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the effect of general practitioners (GPs) working in or alongside the emergency department (GPED) on patient outcomes and experience, and the associated impacts of implementation on the workforce. DESIGN Mixed-methods study: interviews with service leaders and NHS managers; in-depth case studies (n=10) and retrospective observational analysis of routinely collected national data. We used normalisation process theory to map our findings to the theory's four main constructs of coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Data were collected from 64 EDs in England. Case site data included: non-participant observation of 142 clinical encounters; 467 semistructured interviews with policy-makers, service leaders, clinical staff, patients and carers. Retrospective observational analysis used routinely collected Hospital Episode Statistics alongside information on GPED service hours from 40 hospitals for which complete data were available. RESULTS There was disagreement at individual, stakeholder and organisational levels regarding the purpose and potential impact of GPED (coherence). Participants criticised policy development and implementation, and staff engagement was hindered by tensions between ED and GP staff (cognitive participation). Patient 'streaming' processes, staffing and resource constraints influenced whether GPED became embedded in routine practice. Concerns that GPED may increase ED attendance influenced staff views. Our quantitative analysis showed no detectable impact on attendance (collective action). Stakeholders disagreed whether GPED was successful, due to variations in GPED model, site-specific patient mix and governance arrangements. Following statistical adjustment for multiple testing, we found no impact on: ED reattendances within 7 days, patients discharged within 4 hours of arrival, patients leaving the ED without being seen; inpatient admissions; non-urgent ED attendances and 30-day mortality (reflexive monitoring). CONCLUSIONS We found a high degree of variability between hospital sites, but no overall evidence that GPED increases the efficient operation of EDs or improves clinical outcomes, patient or staff experience. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISCRTN5178022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joy Adamson
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Chris Salisbury
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Heather Brant
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, College of Health, Science and Society, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Helen Anderson
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Helen Baxter
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Karen Bloor
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Sean Cowlishaw
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tim Doran
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - James Gaughan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Andy Gibson
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, College of Health, Science and Society, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Nils Gutacker
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Sarah Purdy
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Voss
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, College of Health, Science and Society, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Jonathan Richard Benger
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, College of Health, Science and Society, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bennett J, Heron J, Gunnell D, Purdy S, Linton MJ. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on student mental health and wellbeing in UK university students: a multiyear cross-sectional analysis. J Ment Health 2022; 31:597-604. [PMID: 35786110 DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2022.2091766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ongoing concern for the unique mental health challenges faced by university students has been magnified by the disruption of the global COVID-19 pandemic since March 2020. AIMS This study aimed to investigate changes in mental health and wellbeing outcomes for UK university students since the pandemic began, and to examine whether more vulnerable groups were disproportionately impacted. METHODS Students at a UK university responded to anonymous online cross-sectional surveys in 2019 (N = 2637), 2020 (N = 3693), and 2021 (N = 2772). Students completed measures of depression, anxiety and subjective wellbeing (SWB). Multivariable logistic regression models investigated associations of survey year and sociodemographic characteristics with mental health and SWB. RESULTS Compared to 2019, fewer students showed high levels of depression and anxiety symptoms in 2020. However, there was evidence of worsened levels of anxiety and SWB in 2021 compared to 2019. Interaction effects indicated that students from a Black, Asian or minority ethnicity background and students previously diagnosed with a mental health difficulty showed improved outcomes in 2021 compared to previous years. CONCLUSIONS There is a need for sector-wide strategies including preventative approaches, appropriate treatment options for students already experiencing difficulties and ongoing monitoring post-pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacks Bennett
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jon Heron
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - David Gunnell
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Creavin ST, Noel-Storr AH, Langdon RJ, Richard E, Creavin AL, Cullum S, Purdy S, Ben-Shlomo Y. Clinical judgement by primary care physicians for the diagnosis of all-cause dementia or cognitive impairment in symptomatic people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 6:CD012558. [PMID: 35709018 PMCID: PMC9202995 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012558.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In primary care, general practitioners (GPs) unavoidably reach a clinical judgement about a patient as part of their encounter with patients, and so clinical judgement can be an important part of the diagnostic evaluation. Typically clinical decision making about what to do next for a patient incorporates clinical judgement about the diagnosis with severity of symptoms and patient factors, such as their ideas and expectations for treatment. When evaluating patients for dementia, many GPs report using their own judgement to evaluate cognition, using information that is immediately available at the point of care, to decide whether someone has or does not have dementia, rather than more formal tests. OBJECTIVES To determine the diagnostic accuracy of GPs' clinical judgement for diagnosing cognitive impairment and dementia in symptomatic people presenting to primary care. To investigate the heterogeneity of test accuracy in the included studies. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE (Ovid SP), Embase (Ovid SP), PsycINFO (Ovid SP), Web of Science Core Collection (ISI Web of Science), and LILACs (BIREME) on 16 September 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA We selected cross-sectional and cohort studies from primary care where clinical judgement was determined by a GP either prospectively (after consulting with a patient who has presented to a specific encounter with the doctor) or retrospectively (based on knowledge of the patient and review of the medical notes, but not relating to a specific encounter with the patient). The target conditions were dementia and cognitive impairment (mild cognitive impairment and dementia) and we included studies with any appropriate reference standard such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), International Classification of Diseases (ICD), aetiological definitions, or expert clinical diagnosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors screened titles and abstracts for relevant articles and extracted data separately with differences resolved by consensus discussion. We used QUADAS-2 to evaluate the risk of bias and concerns about applicability in each study using anchoring statements. We performed meta-analysis using the bivariate method. MAIN RESULTS We identified 18,202 potentially relevant articles, of which 12,427 remained after de-duplication. We assessed 57 full-text articles and extracted data on 11 studies (17 papers), of which 10 studies had quantitative data. We included eight studies in the meta-analysis for the target condition dementia and four studies for the target condition cognitive impairment. Most studies were at low risk of bias as assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool, except for the flow and timing domain where four studies were at high risk of bias, and the reference standard domain where two studies were at high risk of bias. Most studies had low concern about applicability to the review question in all QUADAS-2 domains. Average age ranged from 73 years to 83 years (weighted average 77 years). The percentage of female participants in studies ranged from 47% to 100%. The percentage of people with a final diagnosis of dementia was between 2% and 56% across studies (a weighted average of 21%). For the target condition dementia, in individual studies sensitivity ranged from 34% to 91% and specificity ranged from 58% to 99%. In the meta-analysis for dementia as the target condition, in eight studies in which a total of 826 of 2790 participants had dementia, the summary diagnostic accuracy of clinical judgement of general practitioners was sensitivity 58% (95% confidence interval (CI) 43% to 72%), specificity 89% (95% CI 79% to 95%), positive likelihood ratio 5.3 (95% CI 2.4 to 8.2), and negative likelihood ratio 0.47 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.61). For the target condition cognitive impairment, in individual studies sensitivity ranged from 58% to 97% and specificity ranged from 40% to 88%. The summary diagnostic accuracy of clinical judgement of general practitioners in four studies in which a total of 594 of 1497 participants had cognitive impairment was sensitivity 84% (95% CI 60% to 95%), specificity 73% (95% CI 50% to 88%), positive likelihood ratio 3.1 (95% CI 1.4 to 4.7), and negative likelihood ratio 0.23 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.40). It was impossible to draw firm conclusions in the analysis of heterogeneity because there were small numbers of studies. For specificity we found the data were compatible with studies that used ICD-10, or applied retrospective judgement, had higher reported specificity compared to studies with DSM definitions or using prospective judgement. In contrast for sensitivity, we found studies that used a prospective index test may have had higher sensitivity than studies that used a retrospective index test. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Clinical judgement of GPs is more specific than sensitive for the diagnosis of dementia. It would be necessary to use additional tests to confirm the diagnosis for either target condition, or to confirm the absence of the target conditions, but clinical judgement may inform the choice of further testing. Many people who a GP judges as having dementia will have the condition. People with false negative diagnoses are likely to have less severe disease and some could be identified by using more formal testing in people who GPs judge as not having dementia. Some false positives may require similar practical support to those with dementia, but some - such as some people with depression - may suffer delayed intervention for an alternative treatable pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ryan J Langdon
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Edo Richard
- Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Cognition, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Sarah Cullum
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Yoav Ben-Shlomo
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Linton MJ, Biddle L, Bennet J, Gunnell D, Purdy S, Kidger J. Barriers to students opting-in to universities notifying emergency contacts when serious mental health concerns emerge: A UK mixed methods analysis of policy preferences. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
8
|
Pocock LV, Purdy S, Barclay S, Murtagh FEM, Selman LE. Communication of poor prognosis between secondary and primary care: protocol for a systematic review with narrative synthesis. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e055731. [PMID: 34949630 PMCID: PMC9066345 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION People dying in Britain spend, on average, 3 weeks of their last year of life in hospital. Hospital discharge presents an opportunity for secondary care clinicians to communicate to general practitioners (GPs) which patients may have a poor prognosis. This would allow GPs to prioritise these patients for Advance Care Planning.The objective of this study is to produce a critical overview of research on the communication of poor prognosis between secondary and primary care through a systematic review and narrative synthesis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will search Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Social Sciences Citation Index for all study types, published since 1 January 2000, and conduct reference-mining of systematic reviews and publications. Study quality will be assessed using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool; a narrative synthesis will be undertaken to integrate and summarise findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Approval by research ethics committee is not required since the review only includes published and publicly accessible data. Review findings will inform a qualitative study of the sharing of poor prognosis at hospital discharge. We will publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal as per Preferred Reporting for Systematic review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidance. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD42021236087.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy V Pocock
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Stephen Barclay
- General Practice Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fliss E M Murtagh
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Lucy E Selman
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Creavin ST, Haworth J, Fish M, Cullum S, Bayer A, Purdy S, Ben-Shlomo Y. Clinical judgment of GPs for the diagnosis of dementia: a diagnostic test accuracy study. BJGP Open 2021; 5:BJGPO.2021.0058. [PMID: 34315715 PMCID: PMC8596317 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpo.2021.0058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND GPs often report using clinical judgment to diagnose dementia. AIM To investigate the accuracy of GPs' clinical judgment for the diagnosis of dementia. DESIGN & SETTING Diagnostic test accuracy study, recruiting from 21 practices around Bristol, UK. METHOD The clinical judgment of the treating GP (index test) was based on the information immediately available at their initial consultation with a person aged ≥70 years who had cognitive symptoms. The reference standard was an assessment by a specialist clinician, based on a standardised clinical examination and made according to the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) criteria for dementia. RESULTS A total of 240 people were recruited, with a median age of 80 years (interquartile range [IQR] 75-84 years), of whom 126 (53%) were men and 132 (55%) had dementia. The median duration of symptoms was 24 months (IQR 12-36 months) and the median Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III (ACE-III) score was 75 (IQR 65-87). GP clinical judgment had sensitivity 56% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 47% to 65%) and specificity 89% (95% CI = 81% to 94%). Positive likelihood ratio was higher in people aged 70-79 years (6.5, 95% CI = 2.9 to 15) compared with people aged ≥80 years (3.6, 95% CI = 1.7 to 7.6), and in women (10.4, 95% CI = 3.4 to 31.7) compared with men (3.2, 95% CI = 1.7 to 6.2), whereas the negative likelihood ratio was similar in all groups. CONCLUSION A GP clinical judgment of dementia is specific, but confirmatory testing is needed to exclude dementia in symptomatic people whom GPs judge as not having dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Judy Haworth
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Mark Fish
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Sarah Cullum
- Depatment of Psychological Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of Auckland, Grafton, New Zealand
| | | | - Sarah Purdy
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Yoav Ben-Shlomo
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shaw A, Morton K, King A, Chalder M, Calvert J, Jenkins S, Purdy S. Using and implementing care bundles for patients with acute admission for COPD: qualitative study of healthcare professionals' experience in four hospitals in England. BMJ Open Respir Res 2021; 7:7/1/e000515. [PMID: 32213536 PMCID: PMC7173984 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2019] [Revised: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Care bundles are sets of evidence-based interventions to improve quality of hospital care at admission and discharge. Within a wider multi-method evaluation of care bundles for adults with an emergency admission for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a qualitative study was conducted. The aim was to evaluate how bundles were used, and healthcare professionals’ experiences of the impact of bundles on the process of care delivery. Methods Within the wider evaluation, four acute hospitals that were using COPD care bundles were purposefully sampled for geographical variation. Qualitative data were gathered through non-participant observation of patient care and interviews with healthcare professionals, patients and carers. This paper reports a thematic analysis of data from observation and interviews with professionals. Results Healthcare professionals generally experienced care bundles as positive for standardising working practices and patient care, valuing how bundles could support a clear care pathway for patients, enable transitions between settings and identify postdischarge support required by patients. Successful use of bundles was perceived as more likely with the presence of either (or both) a clinical champion for bundles and system-based initiatives such as financial incentives, within a local culture of quality improvement. Challenges in accurately diagnosing COPD hampered bundle use, including delivery of bundles to those subsequently considered ineligible, or missed opportunities to deliver admission bundles to those with COPD. Conclusion Care bundles shape admission and discharge care processes for patients with COPD, from the perspective of staff involved in their delivery. However, different organisational, staff and clinical factors aid or hinder bundle use in an acute hospital context, suggesting potentially resolvable reasons for variable implementation of bundles. Finally, bundles may enhance staff experience of care delivery, even if the impact on patient outcomes remains uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Shaw
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK
| | - Katherine Morton
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK
| | - Anna King
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK
| | - Melanie Chalder
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK
| | - James Calvert
- Respiratory Medicine, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Sue Jenkins
- Independent Affiliated Consultant, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Eyles E, Redaniel MT, Purdy S, Tilling K, Ben-Shlomo Y. Associations of GP practice characteristics with the rate of ambulatory care sensitive conditions in people living with dementia in England: an ecological analysis of routine data. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:613. [PMID: 34182996 PMCID: PMC8240405 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06634-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospital admissions for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSCs) are potentially avoidable. Dementia is one of the leading chronic conditions in terms of variability in ACSC admissions by general practice, as well as accounting for around a third of UK emergency admissions. METHODS Using Bayesian multilevel linear regression models, we examined the ecological association of organizational characteristics of general practices (ACSC n=7076, non-ACSC n=7046 units) and Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG n=212 units) in relation to ACSC and non-ACSC admissions for people with dementia in England. RESULTS The rate of hospital admissions are variable between GP practices, with deprivation and being admitted from home as risk factors for admission for ACSC and non-ACSC admissions. The budget allocated by the CCG to mental health shows diverging effects for ACSC versus non-ACSC admissions, so it is likely there is some geographic variation. CONCLUSIONS A variety of factors that could explain avoidable admissions for PWD at the practice level were examined; most were equally predictive for avoidable and non-avoidable admissions. However, a high amount of variation found at the practice level, in conjunction with the diverging effects of the CCG mental health budget, implies that guidance may be applied inconsistently, or local services may have differences in referral criteria. This indicates there is potential scope for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Eyles
- The National Institute for Health Research and Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, 9th Floor, Whitefriars, Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK. .,Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 58 Whiteladies Rd, Bristol, BS8 2PL, UK.
| | - Maria Theresa Redaniel
- The National Institute for Health Research and Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, 9th Floor, Whitefriars, Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK.,Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 58 Whiteladies Rd, Bristol, BS8 2PL, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- The National Institute for Health Research and Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, 9th Floor, Whitefriars, Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK.,Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 58 Whiteladies Rd, Bristol, BS8 2PL, UK
| | - Kate Tilling
- The National Institute for Health Research and Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, 9th Floor, Whitefriars, Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK.,Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 58 Whiteladies Rd, Bristol, BS8 2PL, UK
| | - Yoav Ben-Shlomo
- The National Institute for Health Research and Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, 9th Floor, Whitefriars, Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK.,Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 58 Whiteladies Rd, Bristol, BS8 2PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pocock L, Morris R, French L, Purdy S. Underutilisation of EPaCCS (Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems) in end-of life-care: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2021:bmjspcare-2020-002798. [PMID: 33837112 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To support greater personalisation of end-of-life care, Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems (EPaCCS) have been implemented across England. Here, we describe patient factors associated with dying with an EPaCCS record and explore the association between having an EPaCCS record with cause and place of death. METHOD This is a cross-sectional study using routinely collected data. Data were extracted from primary care records in 20 of 86 general practices within one Clinical Commissioning Group in England. All deaths (n=1723) recorded between 22 February 2018 and 21 February 2019 were included to determine whether the deceased patient had an EPaCCS record at the time of death, a range of demographic factors, place of death and cause of death. RESULTS Only 18% of the sample died with an EPaCCS record, and people who died of a non-cancer cause were less likely to have an EPaCCS record than those who died of cancer (OR=0.41; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.55). Adjusting for patient demographic factors and cause of death, having an EPaCCS record was strongly associated with dying in the community (OR=5.10; 95% CI 3.70 to 7.03). CONCLUSIONS A small proportion of this sample died with an EPaCCS record, despite evidence of an association with dying in the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Pocock
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Richard Morris
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Lydia French
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dixon P, Hollingworth W, Benger J, Calvert J, Chalder M, King A, MacNeill S, Morton K, Sanderson E, Purdy S. Observational Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Using Routine Data: Admission and Discharge Care Bundles for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Pharmacoecon Open 2020; 4:657-667. [PMID: 32215856 PMCID: PMC7688870 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-020-00207-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a prevalent respiratory disease, and accounts for a substantial proportion of unplanned hospital admissions. Care bundles for COPD are a set of standardised, evidence-based interventions that may improve outcomes in hospitalised COPD patients. We estimated the cost effectiveness of care bundles for acute exacerbations of COPD using routinely collected observational data. METHODS Data were collected from implementation (n = 7) and comparator (n = 7) acute hospitals located in England and Wales. We conducted a difference-in-difference cost-effectiveness analysis using a secondary care (i.e. hospital) perspective to examine the effect on National Health Service (NHS) costs and 90-day mortality of implementing care bundles compared with usual care for patients admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of COPD. Adjusted models included as covariates patient age, sex, deprivation, ethnicity and seasonal effects and mixed effects for site. RESULTS Outcomes and baseline characteristics of up to 12,532 patients were analysed using both complete case and multiply imputed models. Implementation of bundles varied. COPD care bundles were associated with slightly lower secondary care costs, but there was no evidence that they improved outcomes once adjustments were made for site and baseline covariates. Care bundles were unlikely to be cost effective for the NHS with an estimated net monetary benefit per 90-day death avoided from an adjusted multiply imputed model of -£1231 (95% confidence interval - £2428 to - £35) at a high cost-effectiveness threshold of £50,000 per 90-day death avoided. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Care bundles for COPD did not appear to be cost effective, although this finding may have been influenced by unmeasured variations in bundle implementation and other potential confounding factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Padraig Dixon
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.
| | - William Hollingworth
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Jonathan Benger
- Department of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, BS16 1DD, UK
| | - James Calvert
- North Bristol Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Melanie Chalder
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Anna King
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Stephanie MacNeill
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Katherine Morton
- Department of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, BS16 1DD, UK
| | - Emily Sanderson
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pocock L, French L, Farr M, Morris R, Purdy S. Impact of electronic palliative care coordination systems (EPaCCS) on care at the end of life across multiple care sectors, in one clinical commissioning group area, in England: a realist evaluation protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e031153. [PMID: 32234738 PMCID: PMC7170566 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Electronic palliative care coordination systems (EPaCCS) aim to support people approaching the end of life (EOL) to receive consistent care, according to their wishes, that is coordinated effectively across multiple care sectors. They are in use across the UK although empirical evidence into their effectiveness is poor. This paper presents a protocol of a mixed-methods study, to understand how, and by whom, EPaCCS are being used and whether EPaCCS are enabling Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) to coordinate patients' EOL care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a mixed-methods study, carried out within a realist paradigm, to evaluate the impact of an EPaCCS on EOL care as provided by a Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) in England. This study has two aims: (1) Describe the socio-demographic characteristics of patients who die with an EPaCCS record, their underlying cause of death and place of death and compare these with patients who die without an EPaCCS record. (2) Explore the impact of an EPaCCS on the experience of receiving EOL care for patients and their carers, and understand HCPs' views and experiences of utilising an EPaCCS to coordinate care for their patients. The study will be conducted in five phases: (1) development of the initial programme theory; (2) focus group with CCG stakeholder board; (3) individual interviews with HCPs, patients, current and bereaved carers; (4) retrospective cohort study of routinely collected data on EPaCCS usage and (5) data analysis and synthesis of study findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been approved by National Health Service South West-Frenchay Research Ethics Committee (REC reference number: 18/SW/0198). Findings will be published in a wide range of outputs targeted at key audiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Pocock
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Lydia French
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Richard Morris
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Redwood S, Simmonds B, Fox F, Shaw A, Neubauer K, Purdy S, Baxter H. Consequences of 'conversations not had': insights into failures in communication affecting delays in hospital discharge for older people living with frailty. J Health Serv Res Policy 2020; 25:213-219. [PMID: 32013572 DOI: 10.1177/1355819619898229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Older people living with frailty (OPLWF) are often unable to leave hospital even if they no longer need acute care. The aim of this study was to elicit the views of health care professionals in England on the barriers to effective discharge of OPLWF. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews with hospital-based doctors and nurses with responsibility for discharging OPLWF from one large urban acute care hospital in England. The data were analysed using the constant comparative method. RESULTS We conducted interviews with 17 doctors (12 senior doctors or consultants and 5 doctors in training) and six senior nurses. Some of our findings reflect well-known barriers to hospital discharge including service fragmentation, requiring skilled coordination that was often not available due to high volumes of work, and poor communication between staff from different organizations. Participants' accounts also referred to less frequently documented factors that affect decision making and the organization of patient discharges. These raised uncomfortable emotions and tensions that were often ignored or avoided. One participant referred to 'conversations not had', or failures in communication, because difficult topics about resuscitation, escalation of treatment and end-of-life care for OPLWF were not addressed. CONCLUSIONS The consequences of not initiating important conversations about decisions relating to the end of life are potentially far reaching not only regarding reduced efficiency due to delayed discharges but also for patients' quality of life and care. As the population of older people is rising, this becomes a key priority for all practitioners in health and social care. Evidence to support practitioners, OPLWF and their families is needed to ensure that these vital conversations take place so that care at the end of life is humane and compassionate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabi Redwood
- Senior Research Fellow in Ethnography, Bristol Medical School - Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, UK.,Deputy Director, National Institute for Health Research Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West, University of Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Bethany Simmonds
- Senior Lecturer in Sociology, School of Social, Historical and Literar Studies, University of Portsmouth, UK
| | - Fiona Fox
- Senior Research Associate in Ethnography, Bristol Medical School - Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, UK.,Senior Research Associate in Ethnography, National Institute for Health Research Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West at University of Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Alison Shaw
- Senior Research Fellow in Primary Care Research, Bristol Medical School - Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, UK
| | - Kyra Neubauer
- Consultant - Care of the Elderly, Clinical Lead Complex Assessment and Liaison Service, North Bristol NHS Trust, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Head of School, Bristol Medical School - Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, UK.,Director, National Institute for Health Research Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West at University of Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Helen Baxter
- NIHR Knowledge Mobilisation Research Fellow, Bristol Medical School - Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Voss S, Brandling J, Pollard K, Taylor H, Black S, Buswell M, Cheston R, Cullum S, Foster T, Kirby K, Prothero L, Purdy S, Solway C, Benger J. A qualitative study on conveyance decision-making during emergency call outs to people with dementia: the HOMEWARD project. BMC Emerg Med 2020; 20:6. [PMID: 31996145 PMCID: PMC6988190 DOI: 10.1186/s12873-020-0306-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Paramedics are increasingly required to make complex decisions as to whether they should convey a patient to hospital or manage their condition at the scene. Dementia can be a significant barrier to the assessment process. However, to our knowledge no research has specifically examined the process of decision-making by paramedics in relation to people with dementia. This qualitative study was designed to investigate the factors influencing the decision-making process during Emergency Medical Services (EMS) calls to older people with dementia who did not require immediate clinical treatment. Methods This qualitative study used a combination of observation, interview and document analysis to investigate the factors influencing the decision-making process during EMS calls to older people with dementia. A researcher worked alongside paramedics in the capacity of observer and recruited eligible patients to participate in case studies. Data were collected from observation notes of decision-making during the incident, patient care records and post incident interviews with participants, and analysed thematically. Findings Four main themes emerged from the data concerning the way that paramedics make conveyance decisions when called to people with dementia: 1) Physical condition; the key factor influencing paramedics’ decision-making was the physical condition of the patient. 2) Cognitive capacity; most of the participants preferred not to remove patients with a diagnosis of dementia from surroundings familiar to them, unless they deemed it absolutely essential. 3) Patient circumstances; this included the patient’s medical history and the support available to them. 4) Professional influences; participants also drew on other perspectives, such as advice from colleagues or information from the patient’s General Practitioner, to inform their decision-making. Conclusion The preference for avoiding unnecessary conveyance for patients with dementia, combined with difficulties in obtaining an accurate patient medical history and assessment, mean that decision-making can be particularly problematic for paramedics. Further research is needed to find reliable ways of assessing patients and accessing information to support conveyance decisions for EMS calls to people with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Voss
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Glenside Campus, Blackberry Hill, Bristol, BS16 1DD, UK.
| | - Janet Brandling
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Glenside Campus, Blackberry Hill, Bristol, BS16 1DD, UK
| | - Katherine Pollard
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Glenside Campus, Blackberry Hill, Bristol, BS16 1DD, UK
| | - Hazel Taylor
- Research Design Service, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Black
- Research and Audit Department, South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK
| | - Marina Buswell
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Richard Cheston
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Glenside Campus, Blackberry Hill, Bristol, BS16 1DD, UK
| | - Sarah Cullum
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Theresa Foster
- Research Support Services, East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Bury St. Edmunds, UK
| | - Kim Kirby
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Glenside Campus, Blackberry Hill, Bristol, BS16 1DD, UK.,Research and Audit Department, South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK
| | - Larissa Prothero
- Research Support Services, East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Bury St. Edmunds, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Chris Solway
- Research Network, Alzheimer's Society, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Benger
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Glenside Campus, Blackberry Hill, Bristol, BS16 1DD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Huntley AL, Davies B, Jones N, Rooney J, Goyder P, Purdy S, Baxter H. Determining when a hospital admission of an older person can be avoided in a subacute setting: a systematic review and concept analysis. J Health Serv Res Policy 2019; 25:252-264. [PMID: 31805793 DOI: 10.1177/1355819619886885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review of the evidence for when a hospital admission for an older person can be avoided in subacute settings. We examined the definition of admission avoidance and the evidence for the factors that are required to avoid admission to hospital in this setting. METHODS Using defined PICOD criteria, we conducted searches in three databases (Medline, Embase and Cinahl) from January 2006 to February 2018. References were screened by title and abstract followed by full paper screening by two reviewers. Additional studies were searched from the grey literature, experts in the field and forward and backward referencing. Data were narratively described, and concept analysis was used to investigate the definition of admission avoidance. RESULTS A total of 17 studies were considered eligible for review; eight provided a definition of admission avoidance and 10 described admission avoidance criteria. We identified three factors which play a key role in admission avoidance in the subacute setting: (1) ambulatory care sensitive conditions and common medical scenarios for the older person, which included respiratory infections or pneumonia, urinary tract infections and catheter care, dehydration and associated symptoms, falls and behavioural management, and managing ongoing chronic conditions; (2) criteria/tools, referring to interventions that have used clinical expertise in conjunction with a range of general and geriatric triage tools; in condition-specific interventions, the decision whether to admit or not was based on level of risk determined by defined clinical tools; and (3) personnel and resources, referring to the need for experts to make the initial decision to avoid an admission. Supervision by nurses or physicians was still needed at subacute level, requiring resources such as short-stay beds, intravenous antibiotic treatment or fluids for rehydration and rapid access to laboratory tests. CONCLUSION The review identified a set of criteria for ambulatory care sensitive conditions and common medical scenarios for the older person that can be treated in the subacute setting with appropriate tools and resources. This information can help commissioners and care providers to take on these important elements and deliver them in a locally designed way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyson L Huntley
- Senior Research Fellow, Centre of Academic Primary Care, School of Population Science, University of Bristol, UK
| | - Ben Davies
- Honorary Senior Research Associate, Centre of Academic Primary Care, School of Population Science, University of Bristol, UK
| | - Nigel Jones
- Consultant Physician, North Bristol Trust, UK
| | - James Rooney
- Senior Project Manager, Transformation & Consultancy, NHS Bristol, North Somerset & South Gloucestershire CCG, UK
| | - Peter Goyder
- General Practitioner Commissioner, NHS Bristol, North Somerset & South Gloucestershire CCG, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Pro Vice-Chancellor, Centre of Academic Primary Care, School of Population Science, University of Bristol, UK
| | - Helen Baxter
- Senior Research Associate, Centre of Academic Primary Care, School of Population Science, University of Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Booker MJ, Purdy S, Barnes R, Shaw ARG. Ambulance use for 'primary care' problems: an ethnographic study of seeking and providing help in a UK ambulance service. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e033037. [PMID: 31601608 PMCID: PMC6797337 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Revised: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore what factors shape a service user's decision to call an emergency ambulance for a 'primary care sensitive' condition (PCSC), including contextual factors. Additionally, to understand the function and purpose of ambulance care from the perspective of service users, and the role health professionals may play in influencing demand for ambulances in PCSCs. DESIGN An ethnographic study set in one UK ambulance service. Patient cases were recruited upon receipt of ambulance treatment for a situation potentially manageable in primary care, as determined by a primary care clinician accompanying emergency medical services (EMS) crews. Methods used included: structured observations of treatment episodes; in-depth interviews with patients, relatives and carers and their GPs; purposeful conversations with ambulance clinicians; analysis of routine healthcare records; analysis of the original EMS 'emergency' telephone call recording. RESULTS We analysed 170 qualitative data items across 50 cases. Three cross-cutting concepts emerged as central to EMS use for a PCSC: (1) There exists a typology of nine 'triggers', which we categorise as either 'internal' or 'external', depending on how much control the caller feels they have of the situation; (2) Calling an ambulance on behalf of someone else creates a specific anxiety about urgency; (3) Healthcare professionals experience conflict around fuelling demand for ambulances. CONCLUSIONS Previous work suggests a range of sociodemographic factors that may be associated with choosing ambulance care in preference to alternatives. Building on established sociological models, this work helps understand how candidacy is displayed during the negotiation of eligibility for ambulance care. Seeking urgent assistance on behalf of another often requires specific support and different strategies. Use of EMS for such problems-although inefficient-is often conceptualised as 'rational' by service users. Public health strategies that seek to advise the public about appropriate use of EMS need to consider how individuals conceptualise an 'emergency' situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew James Booker
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rebecca Barnes
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Ali R G Shaw
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identification of patients at the end-of-life is the first step in care planning and many general practices have Palliative Care Registers. There is evidence that these largely comprise patients with cancer diagnoses, but little is known about the identification process. OBJECTIVE To explore the barriers that hinder GPs from identifying and registering patients on Palliative Care Registers. METHODS An exploratory qualitative approach was undertaken using semi-structured interviews with GPs in South West England. GPs were asked about their experiences of identifying, registering and discussing end-of-life care with patients. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically. RESULTS Most practices had a Palliative Care Register, which were mainly composed of patients with cancer. They reported identifying non-malignant patients at the end-of-life as challenging and were reluctant to include frail or elderly patients due to resource implications. GPs described rarely using prognostication tools to identify patients and conveyed that poor communication between secondary and primary care made prognostication difficult. GPs also detailed challenges around talking to patients about end-of-life care. CONCLUSIONS Palliative Care Registers are widely used by GPs for patients with malignant diagnoses, but seldom for other patients. The findings from our study suggest that this arises because GPs find prognosticating for patients with non-malignant disease more challenging. GPs would value better communication from secondary care, tools for prognostication and training in speaking with patients at the end-of-life enabling them to better identify non-malignant patients at the end-of-life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy V Pocock
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, UK
| | - Lesley Wye
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, UK
| | | | - Sarah Purdy
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tammes P, Payne RA, Salisbury C, Chalder M, Purdy S, Morris RW. The impact of a named GP scheme on continuity of care and emergency hospital admission: a cohort study among older patients in England, 2012-2016. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e029103. [PMID: 31548353 PMCID: PMC6773345 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether the introduction of a named general practitioner (GP, family physician) improved patients' healthcare for patients aged 75 and over in England. SETTING Random sample of 27 500 patients aged 65 to 84 in 2012 within 139 English practices from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked with Hospital Episode Statistics. DESIGN Prospective cohort approach, measuring patients' GP consultations and emergency hospital admissions 2 years before/after the intervention. Patients were grouped in (i) aged over 74 and (ii) younger than 75 in both periods in order to compare who were or were not subject to the intervention. Adjusted associations between the named GP scheme, continuity of care and emergency hospital admission were examined using multilevel modelling. INTERVENTION National Health Service policy to introduce a named accountable GP for patients aged over 74 in April 2014. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES (A) Continuity of care index-score, (B) risk of emergency hospital admissions, (C) number of emergency hospital admissions. RESULTS The intervention was associated with a decrease in continuity index-scores of -0.024 (95% CI -0.030 to -0.018, p<0.001); there were no differences in the decrease between the two age groups (-0.005, 95% CI -0.014 to 0.005). In the pre-intervention and post-intervention periods, respectively, 15.4% and 19.4% patients had an emergency admission. The probability of an emergency hospital admission increased after the intervention (OR 1.156, 95% CI 1.064 to 1.257, p=0.001); this increase was bigger for patients over 74 (relative OR 1.191, 95% CI 1.066 to 1.330, p=0.002). The average number of emergency hospital admissions increased after the intervention (rate ratio (RR) 1.178, 95% CI 1.103 to 1.259, p<0.001); this increase was greater for patients over 74 (relative RR 1.143, 95% CI 1.052 to 1.242, p=0.001). CONCLUSION The introduction of the named GP scheme was not associated with improvements in either continuity of care or rates of unplanned hospitalisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Tammes
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rupert A Payne
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Chris Salisbury
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Melanie Chalder
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Richard W Morris
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Morton K, Sanderson E, Dixon P, King A, Jenkins S, MacNeill SJ, Shaw A, Metcalfe C, Chalder M, Hollingworth W, Benger J, Calvert J, Purdy S. Care bundles to reduce re-admissions for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed-methods study. Health Serv Deliv Res 2019. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr07210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the commonest respiratory disease in the UK, accounting for 10% of emergency hospital admissions annually. Nearly one-third of patients are re-admitted within 28 days of discharge.ObjectivesThe study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of introducing standardised packages of care (i.e. care bundles) as a means of improving hospital care and reducing re-admissions for COPD.DesignA mixed-methods evaluation with a controlled before-and-after design.ParticipantsAdults admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of COPD in England and Wales.InterventionCOPD care bundles.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was re-admission to hospital within 28 days of discharge. The study investigated secondary outcomes including length of stay, total number of bed-days, in-hospital mortality, 90-day mortality, context, process and costs of care, and staff, patient and carer experience.Data sourcesRoutine NHS data, including numbers of COPD admissions and re-admissions, in-hospital mortality and length of stay data, were provided by 31 sites for 12 months before and after the intervention roll-out. Detailed pseudo-anonymised data on care during admission were collected from a subset of 14 sites, in addition to information about delivery of individual components of care collected from random samples of medical records at each location. Six case study sites provided data from interviews, observation and documentary review to explore implementation, engagement and perceived impact on delivery of care.ResultsThere is no evidence that care bundles reduced 28-day re-admission rates for COPD. All-cause re-admission rates, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, total number of bed-days, and re-admission and mortality rates in the 90 days following discharge were similar at implementation and comparator sites, as were resource utilisation, NHS secondary care costs and cost-effectiveness of care. However, the rate of emergency department (ED) attendances decreased more in implementation sites than in comparator sites {implementation: incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.63 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56 to 0.70]; comparator: IRR 1.14 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.26) interactionp < 0.001}. Admission bundles appear to be more complex to implement than discharge bundles, with 3.7% of comparator patients receiving all five admission bundle elements, compared with 7.6% of patients in implementation sites, and 28.3% of patients in implementation sites receiving all five discharge bundle elements, compared with 0.8% of patients in the comparator sites. Although patients and carers were unaware that care was bundled, staff view bundles positively, as they help to standardise working practices, support a clear care pathway for patients, facilitate communication between clinicians and identify post-discharge support.LimitationsThe observational nature of the study design means that secular trends and residual confounding cannot be discounted as potential sources of any observed between-site differences. The availability of data from some sites was suboptimal.ConclusionsCare bundles are valued by health-care professionals, but were challenging to implement and there was a blurring of the distinction between the implementation and comparator groups, which may have contributed to the lack of effect on re-admissions and mortality. Care bundles do appear to be associated with a reduced number of subsequent ED attendances, but care bundles are unlikely to be cost-effective for COPD.Future workA longitudinal study using implementation science methodology could provide more in-depth insights into the implementation of care bundles.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN13022442.FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full inHealth Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 7, No. 21. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emily Sanderson
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Padraig Dixon
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Anna King
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Stephanie J MacNeill
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Alison Shaw
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | - Jonathan Benger
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - James Calvert
- Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Morton K, MacNeill S, Sanderson E, Dixon P, King A, Jenkins S, Metcalfe C, Shaw A, Chalder M, Benger J, Hollingworth W, Calvert J, Purdy S. Evaluation of 'care bundles' for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a multisite study in the UK. BMJ Open Respir Res 2019; 6:e000425. [PMID: 31258918 PMCID: PMC6561386 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2019] [Revised: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) accounts for 10% of emergency hospital admissions in the UK annually. Nearly 33% of patients are readmitted within 28 days of discharge. We evaluated the effectiveness of implementing standardised packages of care called 'care bundles' on COPD readmission, emergency department (ED) attendance, mortality, costs and process of care. Methods This is a mixed-methods, controlled before-and-after study with nested case studies. 31 acute hospitals in England and Wales which introduced COPD care bundles (implementation sites) or provided usual care (comparator sites) were recruited and provided monthly aggregate data. 14 sites provided additional individual patient data. Participants were adults admitted with an acute exacerbation of COPD. Results There was no evidence that care bundles reduced 28-day COPD readmission rates: OR=1.02 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.26). However, the rate of ED attendance was reduced in implementation sites over and above that in comparator sites (implementation: IRR=0.63 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.71); comparator: IRR=1.12 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.24); group-time interaction p<0.001). At implementation sites, delivery of all bundle elements was higher but was only achieved in 2.2% (admissions bundle) and 7.6% (discharge bundle) of cases. There was no evidence of cost-effectiveness. Staff viewed bundles positively, believing they help standardise practice and facilitate communication between clinicians. However, they lacked skills in change management, leading to inconsistent implementation. Discussion COPD care bundles were not effectively implemented in this study. They were associated with a reduced number of subsequent ED attendances, but not with change in readmissions, mortality or reduced costs. This is unsurprising given the low level of bundle uptake in implementation sites, and it remains to be determined if COPD care bundles affect patient care and outcomes when they are effectively implemented. Trial registration number ISRCTN13022442.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Morton
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | - Padraig Dixon
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Anna King
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Chris Metcalfe
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Ali Shaw
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Jonathan Benger
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
- University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | | | - James Calvert
- Respiratory Medicine, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Glogowska M, Cramer H, Pendlebury S, Purdy S, Lasserson D. Experiences of Ambulatory Care for Frail, Older People and Their Carers During Acute Illness: A Qualitative, Ethnographic Study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2019; 20:1344-1347. [PMID: 31080162 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Revised: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sarah Purdy
- University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore common features of conversations occurring in a sample of emergency calls that result in an ambulance dispatch for a 'primary care sensitive' situation, and better understand the challenges of triaging this cohort. DESIGN A qualitative study, applying conversation analytic methods to routinely recorded telephone calls made through the '999' system for an emergency ambulance. Cases were identified by a primary care clinician, observing front-line UK ambulance service shifts. A sample of 48 '999' recordings were analysed, corresponding to situations potentially amenable to primary care management. RESULTS The analysis focuses on four recurring ways that speakers use talk in these calls. Progress can be impeded when call-taker's questions appear to require callers to have access to knowledge that is not available to them. Accordingly, callers often provide personal accounts of observed events, which may be troublesome for call-takers to 'code' and triage. Certain question formats-notably 'alternative question' formats-appear particularly problematic. Callers deploy specific lexical, grammatical and prosodic resources to legitimise the contact as 'urgent', and ensure that their perception of risk is conveyed. Difficulties encountered in the triage exchange may be evidence of misalignment between organisational and caller perceptions of the 'purpose' of the questions. CONCLUSIONS Previous work has focused on exploring the presentation and triage of life-threatening medical emergencies. Meaningful insights into the challenges of EMS triage can also be gained by exploring calls for 'primary care sensitive' situations. The highly scripted triage process requires precise, 'codeable' responses to questions, which can create challenges when the exact urgency of the problem is unclear to both caller and call-taker. Calling on behalf of someone else may compound this complexity. The aetiology of some common interactional challenges may offer a useful frame for future comparison between calls for 'primary care sensitive' situations and life-threatening emergencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew James Booker
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Ali R G Shaw
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rebecca Barnes
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Morton K, Voss S, Adamson J, Baxter H, Bloor K, Brandling J, Cowlishaw S, Doran T, Gibson A, Gutacker N, Liu D, Purdy S, Roy P, Salisbury C, Scantlebury A, Vaittinen A, Watson R, Benger JR. General practitioners and emergency departments (GPED)-efficient models of care: a mixed-methods study protocol. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e024012. [PMID: 30287675 PMCID: PMC6194458 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pressure continues to grow on emergency departments in the UK and throughout the world, with declining performance and adverse effects on patient outcome, safety and experience. One proposed solution is to locate general practitioners to work in or alongside the emergency department (GPED). Several GPED models have been introduced, however, evidence of effectiveness is weak. This study aims to evaluate the impact of GPED on patient care, the primary care and acute hospital team and the wider urgent care system. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The study will be divided into three work packages (WPs). WP-A; Mapping and Taxonomy: mapping, description and classification of current models of GPED in all emergency departments in England and interviews with key informants to examine the hypotheses that underpin GPED. WP-B; Quantitative Analysis of National Data: measurement of the effectiveness, costs and consequences of the GPED models identified in WP-A, compared with a no-GPED model, using retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics Data. WP-C; Case Studies: detailed case studies of different GPED models using a mixture of qualitative and quantitative methods including: non-participant observation of clinical care, semistructured interviews with staff, patients and carers; workforce surveys with emergency department staff and analysis of available local routinely collected hospital data. Prospective case study sites will be identified by completing telephone interviews with sites awarded capital funding by the UK government to implement GPED initiatives. The study has a strong patient and public involvement group that has contributed to study design and materials, and which will be closely involved in data interpretation and dissemination. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been approved by the National Health Service East Midlands-Leicester South Research Ethics Committee: 17/EM/0312. The results of the study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conferences and a planned programme of knowledge mobilisation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN51780222.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Morton
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Voss
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Joy Adamson
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Helen Baxter
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Karen Bloor
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Janet Brandling
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Sean Cowlishaw
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tim Doran
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Andrew Gibson
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Nils Gutacker
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Dan Liu
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Paul Roy
- Bristol NHS Clinical Commissioning Group, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | - Anu Vaittinen
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rose Watson
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Purdy S. Small herd behaviour in domestic donkeys. EQUINE VET EDUC 2018. [DOI: 10.1111/eve.12998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S. Purdy
- Nunoa Project Belchertown Massachusetts USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Voss S, Brandling J, Taylor H, Black S, Buswell M, Cheston R, Cullum S, Foster T, Kirby K, Prothero L, Purdy S, Solway C, Benger JR. How do people with dementia use the ambulance service? A retrospective study in England: the HOMEWARD project. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e022549. [PMID: 30068624 PMCID: PMC6074617 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES An increasing number of older people are calling ambulances and presenting to accident and emergency departments. The presence of comorbidities and dementia can make managing these patients more challenging and hospital admission more likely, resulting in poorer outcomes for patients. However, we do not know how many of these patients are conveyed to hospital by ambulance. This study aims to determine: how often ambulances are called to older people; how often comorbidities including dementia are recorded; the reason for the call; provisional diagnosis; the amount of time ambulance clinicians spend on scene; the frequency with which these patients are transported to hospital. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of ambulance patient care records (PCRs) from calls to patients aged 65 years and over. Data were collected from two ambulance services in England during 24 or 48 hours periods in January 2017 and July 2017. The records were examined by two researchers using a standard template and the data were extracted from 3037 PCRs using a coding structure. RESULTS Results were reported as percentages and means with 95% CIs. Dementia was recorded in 421 (13.9%) of PCRs. Patients with dementia were significantly less likely to be conveyed to hospital following an emergency call than those without dementia. The call cycle times were similar for patients regardless of whether or not they had dementia. Calls to people with dementia were more likely to be due to injury following a fall. In the overall sample, one or more comorbidities were reported on the PCR in over 80% of cases. CONCLUSION Rates of hospital conveyance for older people may be related to comorbidities, frailty and complex needs, rather than dementia. Further research is needed to understand the way in which ambulance clinicians make conveyance decisions at scene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Voss
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Janet Brandling
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Hazel Taylor
- Research Design Service, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Black
- Research and Audit Department, South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Marina Buswell
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Richard Cheston
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Cullum
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Theresa Foster
- Research Support Services, East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Melbourn, UK
| | - Kim Kirby
- Research and Audit Department, South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Larissa Prothero
- Research Support Services, East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Melbourn, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Melbourn, UK
| | - Chris Solway
- Research Network, Alzheimer’s Society, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Richard Benger
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
- Research Design Service, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pufulete M, Maishman R, Dabner L, Higgins JPT, Rogers CA, Dayer M, MacLeod J, Purdy S, Hollingworth W, Schou M, Anguita-Sanchez M, Karlström P, Shochat MK, McDonagh T, Nightingale AK, Reeves BC. B-type natriuretic peptide-guided therapy for heart failure (HF): a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data (IPD) and aggregate data. Syst Rev 2018; 7:112. [PMID: 30064502 PMCID: PMC6069819 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-018-0776-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We estimated the effectiveness of serial B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) blood testing to guide up-titration of medication compared with symptom-guided up-titration of medication in patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We searched: MEDLINE (Ovid) 1950 to 9/06/2016; Embase (Ovid), 1980 to 2016 week 23; the Cochrane Library; ISI Web of Science (Citations Index and Conference Proceedings). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were death related to HF, cardiovascular death, all-cause hospital admission, hospital admission for HF, adverse events, and quality of life. IPD were sought from all RCTs identified. Random-effects meta-analyses (two-stage) were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals (CIs) across RCTs, including HR estimates from published reports of studies that did not provide IPD. We estimated treatment-by-covariate interactions for age, gender, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, HF type; diabetes status and baseline BNP subgroups. Dichotomous outcomes were analysed using random-effects odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI. RESULTS We identified 14 eligible RCTs, five providing IPD. BNP-guided therapy reduced the hazard of hospital admission for HF by 19% (13 RCTs, HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.98) but not all-cause mortality (13 RCTs; HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.01) or cardiovascular mortality (5 RCTs; OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.16). For all-cause mortality, there was a significant interaction between treatment strategy and age (p = 0.034, 11 RCTs; HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53-0.92, patients < 75 years old and HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.84-1.37, patients ≥ 75 years old); ejection fraction (p = 0.026, 11 RCTs; HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71-0.99, patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); and HR 1.33, 95% CI 0.83-2.11, patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)). Adverse events were significantly more frequent with BNP-guided therapy vs. symptom-guided therapy (5 RCTs; OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.60). CONCLUSION BNP-guided therapy did not reduce mortality but reduced HF hospitalisation. The overall quality of the evidence varied from low to very low. The relevance of these findings to unselected patients, particularly those managed by community generalists, are unclear. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42013005335.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Pufulete
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Level 7, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Queen's Building, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK.
| | - Rachel Maishman
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Level 7, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Queen's Building, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK
| | - Lucy Dabner
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Level 7, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Queen's Building, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK
| | - Julian P T Higgins
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Chris A Rogers
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Level 7, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Queen's Building, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK
| | - Mark Dayer
- Department of Cardiology, Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK
| | - John MacLeod
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Morten Schou
- Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Herlev, DK-2730, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Patric Karlström
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, County Hospital Ryhov, Jönköping, Sweden
| | | | - Theresa McDonagh
- Cardiovascular Division, King's College Hospital, King's College London, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Angus K Nightingale
- Department of Cardiology, Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK
| | - Barnaby C Reeves
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Level 7, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Queen's Building, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ridd MJ, Gaunt DM, Guy RH, Redmond NM, Garfield K, Hollinghurst S, Ball N, Shaw L, Purdy S, Metcalfe C. Comparison of patient (POEM), observer (EASI, SASSAD, TIS) and corneometry measures of emollient effectiveness in children with eczema: findings from the COMET feasibility trial. Br J Dermatol 2018; 179:362-370. [PMID: 29476542 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.16475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eczema affects around 20% of children, but multiple different outcome measures have hampered research into the effectiveness of different treatments. OBJECTIVES To compare the change in scores and correlations within and between five measures of eczema severity: Patient-Orientated Eczema Measure (POEM), Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Six Area, Six Sign Atopic Dermatitis (SASSAD), Three Item Severity (TIS) and skin hydration (corneometry). METHODS Data from a feasibility trial that randomized young children with eczema to one of four emollients were used. Participants were followed for 3 months (84 days). Descriptive statistics (by emollient over time) and Spearman's correlation coefficients comparing scores at each time point and absolute change (between adjacent time points) for each outcome measure were calculated. RESULTS In total, 197 children, mean ± SD age 21·7 ± 12·8 months, were randomized. POEM and TIS appeared to capture a range of eczema severity at baseline, but only POEM had close approximation to normal distribution. Mean POEM, EASI, SASSAD and TIS scores improved month by month, with POEM showing the greatest sensitivity (effect size 0·42). Correlations within POEM, EASI, SASSAD and TIS were moderate to good, decreasing over time. Correlations between measures were strongest for EASI, SASSAD and TIS. By contrast, corneometry scores were more variable, correlated less well over time and were poorly correlated with the other measures. CONCLUSIONS Except for corneometry, all measures appear to change in relation to emollient use over time and correlate well with themselves. POEM demonstrated the greatest range of scores at baseline and change in eczema severity over the first 28 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Ridd
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, U.K
| | - D M Gaunt
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, U.K
| | - R H Guy
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, U.K
| | - N M Redmond
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, U.K.,NIHR CLAHRC West, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, 9th Floor, Whitefriars, Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS1 2NT, U.K
| | - K Garfield
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, U.K
| | - S Hollinghurst
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, U.K
| | - N Ball
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, U.K
| | - L Shaw
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Marlborough Street, Bristol, BS1 3NU, U.K
| | - S Purdy
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, U.K
| | - C Metcalfe
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pufulete M, Maishman R, Dabner L, Mohiuddin S, Hollingworth W, Rogers CA, Higgins J, Dayer M, Macleod J, Purdy S, McDonagh T, Nightingale A, Williams R, Reeves BC. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of serum B-type natriuretic peptide testing and monitoring in patients with heart failure in primary and secondary care: an evidence synthesis, cohort study and cost-effectiveness model. Health Technol Assess 2018; 21:1-150. [PMID: 28774374 DOI: 10.3310/hta21400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heart failure (HF) affects around 500,000 people in the UK. HF medications are frequently underprescribed and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP)-guided therapy may help to optimise treatment. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of BNP-guided therapy compared with symptom-guided therapy in HF patients. DESIGN Systematic review, cohort study and cost-effectiveness model. SETTING A literature review and usual care in the NHS. PARTICIPANTS (a) HF patients in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of BNP-guided therapy; and (b) patients having usual care for HF in the NHS. INTERVENTIONS Systematic review: BNP-guided therapy or symptom-guided therapy in primary or secondary care. Cohort study: BNP monitored (≥ 6 months' follow-up and three or more BNP tests and two or more tests per year), BNP tested (≥ 1 tests but not BNP monitored) or never tested. Cost-effectiveness model: BNP-guided therapy in specialist clinics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Mortality, hospital admission (all cause and HF related) and adverse events; and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for the cost-effectiveness model. DATA SOURCES Systematic review: Individual participant or aggregate data from eligible RCTs. Cohort study: The Clinical Practice Research Datalink, Hospital Episode Statistics and National Heart Failure Audit (NHFA). REVIEW METHODS A systematic literature search (five databases, trial registries, grey literature and reference lists of publications) for published and unpublished RCTs. RESULTS Five RCTs contributed individual participant data (IPD) and eight RCTs contributed aggregate data (1536 participants were randomised to BNP-guided therapy and 1538 participants were randomised to symptom-guided therapy). For all-cause mortality, the hazard ratio (HR) for BNP-guided therapy was 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 1.04]. Patients who were aged < 75 years or who had heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) received the most benefit [interactions (p = 0.03): < 75 years vs. ≥ 75 years: HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.92) vs. 1.07 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.37); HFrEF vs. heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF): HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.01) vs. 1.33 (95% CI 0.83 to 2.11)]. In the cohort study, incident HF patients (1 April 2005-31 March 2013) were never tested (n = 13,632), BNP tested (n = 3392) or BNP monitored (n = 71). Median survival was 5 years; all-cause mortality was 141.5 out of 1000 person-years (95% CI 138.5 to 144.6 person-years). All-cause mortality and hospital admission rate were highest in the BNP-monitored group, and median survival among 130,433 NHFA patients (1 January 2007-1 March 2013) was 2.2 years. The admission rate was 1.1 patients per year (interquartile range 0.5-3.5 patients). In the cost-effectiveness model, in patients aged < 75 years with HFrEF or HFpEF, BNP-guided therapy improves median survival (7.98 vs. 6.46 years) with a small QALY gain (5.68 vs. 5.02) but higher lifetime costs (£64,777 vs. £58,139). BNP-guided therapy is cost-effective at a threshold of £20,000 per QALY. LIMITATIONS The limitations of the trial were a lack of IPD for most RCTs and heterogeneous interventions; the inability to identify BNP monitoring confidently, to determine medication doses or to distinguish between HFrEF and HFpEF; the use of a simplified two-state Markov model; a focus on health service costs and a paucity of data on HFpEF patients aged < 75 years and HFrEF patients aged ≥ 75 years. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy of BNP-guided therapy in specialist HF clinics is uncertain. If efficacious, it would be cost-effective for patients aged < 75 years with HFrEF. The evidence reviewed may not apply in the UK because care is delivered differently. FUTURE WORK Identify an optimal BNP-monitoring strategy and how to optimise HF management in accordance with guidelines; update the IPD meta-analysis to include the Guiding Evidence Based Therapy Using Biomarker Intensified Treatment (GUIDE-IT) RCT; collect routine long-term outcome data for completed and ongoing RCTs. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN37248047 and PROSPERO CRD42013005335. FUNDING This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 21, No. 40. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. The British Heart Foundation paid for Chris A Rogers' and Maria Pufulete's time contributing to the study. Syed Mohiuddin's time is supported by the NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust. Rachel Maishman contributed to the study when she was in receipt of a NIHR Methodology Research Fellowship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Pufulete
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rachel Maishman
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Lucy Dabner
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Syed Mohiuddin
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Chris A Rogers
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Julian Higgins
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Mark Dayer
- Department of Cardiology, Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK
| | - John Macleod
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Theresa McDonagh
- Cardiovascular Division, King's College London, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Angus Nightingale
- Department of Cardiology, Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK
| | - Rachael Williams
- Clinical Practice Research Datalink, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, London, UK
| | - Barnaby C Reeves
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Fleetcroft R, Hardcastle A, Steel N, Price GM, Purdy S, Lipp A, Myint PK, Howe A. Does practice analysis agree with the ambulatory care sensitive conditions' list of avoidable unplanned admissions?: a cross-sectional study in the East of England. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e020756. [PMID: 29705762 PMCID: PMC5931280 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To use significant event audits (SEAs) in primary care to determine which of a sample of emergency (unplanned) admissions were potentially avoidable; and compare with the National Health Service (NHS) list of ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs). DESIGN Analysis of unplanned medical admissions randomly identified in secondary care. SETTING Primary care in the East of England. PARTICIPANTS 20 general practice teams trained to use SEA on unplanned admissions to identify potentially preventable factors. INTERVENTIONS SEA of admissions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Level of agreement between those admissions identified as potentially preventable by SEA and the NHS ACSC list. RESULTS 132 (26%) of randomly selected patients with unplanned admissions gave consent and an SEA was performed by their primary practice team. 130 SEA reports had sufficient data for our analysis. Practices concluded that 17 (13%) admissions were potentially preventable. The NHS ACSC list identified 36 admissions (28%) as potentially preventable. There was a low level of agreement between the practices and the NHS list as to which admissions were preventable (kappa=0.253). The ACSC list consisted mainly of respiratory admissions whereas the practice list identified a wider range of cases and identified context-specific factors as important. CONCLUSIONS There was disagreement between the NHS list and practice conclusions of potentially avoidable admissions. The SEAs suggest that the pathway into unplanned admission may be less dependent on the condition than on context-specific factors, and the assumption that unplanned admissions for ACSCs are reasonable indicators of performance for primary care may not be valid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antonia Hardcastle
- Research and Development Department, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King’s Lynn NHS Foundation Trust, King’s Lynn, UK
| | - Nicholas Steel
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Gill M Price
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Alistair Lipp
- NHS England Midlands & East [East], Victoria House, Capital Park, Fulbourn, UK
| | - Phyo Kyaw Myint
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences & Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Amanda Howe
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
King AJL, Johnson R, Cramer H, Purdy S, Huntley AL. Community case management and unplanned hospital admissions in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis. J Adv Nurs 2018; 74:1463-1473. [PMID: 29495081 DOI: 10.1111/jan.13559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study was to describe case management as experienced by patients with heart failure and their health professionals with the aim of understanding why case management might contribute in reducing hospital admissions. BACKGROUND Heart failure is a common cause of unplanned hospital admission. The evidence for case management in patients with heart failure for reducing admissions is promising. DESIGN Systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis. DATA SOURCE Searches were conducted in Medline, Psychinfo, Kings Fund database and Cinahl from inception of each database to 16 February 2017. REVIEW METHODS Robust systematic review methodology was used to identify qualitative studies describing the experiences of patients with heart failure and healthcare providers of case management. Data were synthesized thematically, and analytic themes were developed. FINDINGS Five studies (six papers) from which nine descriptive themes were used to determine three analytic themes. This synthesis showed that case management provides positive quality of care for patients, increases perceived access to services and creates more time to ask questions and develop trusted relationships. For health professionals, case management enhanced care by improved relationships with both patients and colleagues although concerns remained around resources, training and inter-professional conflict. CONCLUSIONS This synthesis emphasizes the importance of the quality of being cared for as a patient and caring as a health professional. Case management enhances communication between patients and health professionals, supports patient self-care and self-management and can be an important contributing factor in reducing unplanned admissions for patients with heart failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Jyoti Louise King
- Centre of Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rachel Johnson
- Centre of Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Helen Cramer
- Centre of Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Centre of Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Alyson Louise Huntley
- Centre of Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Tammes P, Purdy S, Salisbury C, MacKichan F, Lasserson D, Morris RW. Continuity of Primary Care and Emergency Hospital Admissions Among Older Patients in England. Ann Fam Med 2017; 15:515-522. [PMID: 29133489 PMCID: PMC5683862 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2016] [Revised: 05/11/2017] [Accepted: 06/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Secondary health care services have been under considerable pressure in England as attendance rates increase, resulting in longer waiting times and greater demands on staff. This study's aim was to examine the association between continuity of care and risk of emergency hospital admission among older adults. METHODS We analyzed records from 10,000 patients aged 65 years and older in 2012 within 297 English general practices obtained from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and linked with Hospital Episode Statistics. We used the Bice and Boxerman (BB) index and the appointed general practitioner index (last general practitioner consulted before hospitalization) to quantify patient-physician continuity. The BB index was used in a prospective cohort approach to assess impact of continuity on risk of admission. Both indices were used in a separate retrospective nested case-control approach to test the effect of changing physician on the odds of hospital admission in the following 30 days. RESULTS In the prospective cohort analysis, the BB index showed a graded, non-significant inverse relationship of continuity of care with risk of emergency hospital admission, although the hazard ratio for patients experiencing least continuity was 2.27 (95% CI, 1.37-3.76) compared with those having complete continuity. In the retrospective nested case-control analysis, we found a graded inverse relationship between continuity of care and emergency hospital admission for both BB and appointed general practitioner indices: for the latter, the odds ratio for those experiencing least continuity was 2.32 (95% CI, 1.48-3.63) relative to those experiencing most continuity. CONCLUSIONS Marked discontinuity of care might contribute to increased unplanned hospital admissions among patients aged 65 years and older. Schemes to enhance continuity of care have the potential to reduce hospital admissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Tammes
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Salisbury
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona MacKichan
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Lasserson
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.,Department of Gerontology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Richard W Morris
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Brooker M, Barnes R, Heawood A, Purdy S. 05 Exploring why ‘primary care’ problems end up receiving ambulance treatment: early findings from a pre-hospital ethnographic study. Arch Emerg Med 2017. [DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207114.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
35
|
Booker M, Barnes R, Heawood A, Purdy S. PP20 Using conversation analysis (ca) to explore 999-call recordings: what can micro-analysis of ‘talk’ reveal about help seeking for low-acuity conditions? Arch Emerg Med 2017. [DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207114.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
36
|
Tammes P, Morris RW, Brangan E, Checkland K, England H, Huntley A, Lasserson D, MacKichan F, Salisbury C, Wye L, Purdy S. Exploring the relationship between general practice characteristics and attendance at Walk-in Centres, Minor Injuries Units and Emergency Departments in England 2009/10-2012/2013: a longitudinal study. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:546. [PMID: 28789652 PMCID: PMC5549356 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2483-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2016] [Accepted: 07/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The UK National Health Service Emergency Departments (ED) have recently faced increasing attendance rates. This study investigated associations of general practice and practice population characteristics with emergency care service attendance rates. METHODS A longitudinal design with practice-level measures of access and continuity of care, patient population demographics and use of emergency care for the financial years 2009/10 to 2012/13. The main outcome measures were self-referred discharged ED attendance rate, and combined self-referred discharged ED, self-referred Walk-in Centre (WiC) and self-referred Minor Injuries Unit (MIU) attendance rate per 1000 patients. Multilevel models estimated adjusted regression coefficients for relationships between patients' emergency attendance rates and patients' reported satisfaction with opening hours and waiting time at the practice, proportion of patients having a preferred GP, and use of WiC and MIU, both between practices, and within practices over time. RESULTS Practice characteristics associated with higher ED attendance rates included lower percentage of patients satisfied with waiting time (0.22 per 1% decrease, 95%CI 0.02 to 0.43) and lower percentage having a preferred GP (0.12 per 1% decrease, 95%CI 0.02 to 0.21). Population influences on higher attendance included more elderly, more female and more unemployed patients, and lower male life-expectancy and urban conurbation location. Net reductions in ED attendance were only seen for practices whose WiC or MIU attendance was high, above the 60th centile for MIU and above the 75th centile for WiC. Combined emergency care attendance fell over time if more patients within a practice were satisfied with opening hours (-0.26 per 1% increase, 95%CI -0.45 to -0.08). CONCLUSION Practices with more patients satisfied with waiting time, having a preferred GP, and using MIU and WIC services, had lower ED attendance. Increases over time in attendance at MIUs, and patient satisfaction with opening hours was associated with reductions in service use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Tammes
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Richard W Morris
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Emer Brangan
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Kath Checkland
- Centre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Alyson Huntley
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Daniel Lasserson
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Fiona MacKichan
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Chris Salisbury
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Lesley Wye
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To understand the reasons behind, and experience of, seeking and receiving emergency ambulance treatment for a 'primary care sensitive' condition. DESIGN A comprehensive, qualitative systematic review. Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, Health Management Information Systems, Healthcare Management Information Consortium, OpenSigle, EThOS and Digital Archive of Research Theses databases were systematically searched for studies exploring patient, carer or healthcare professional interactions with ambulance services for 'primary care sensitive' problems. Studies using wholly qualitative approaches or mixed-methods studies with substantial use of qualitative techniques in both the methods and analysis sections were included. An analytical thematic synthesis was undertaken, using a line-by-line qualitative coding method and a hierarchical inductive approach. RESULTS Of 1458 initial results, 33 studies met the first level (relevance) inclusion criteria, and six studies met the second level (methodology and quality) criteria. The analysis suggests that patients define situations worthy of 'emergency' ambulance use according to complex socioemotional factors, as well as experienced physical symptoms. There can be a mismatch between how patients and professionals define 'emergency' situations. Deciding to call an ambulance is a process shaped by practical considerations and a strong emotional component, which can be influenced by the views of caregivers. Sometimes the value of a contact with the ambulance service is principally in managing this emotional component. Patients often wish to hand over responsibility for decisions when experiencing a perceived emergency. Feeling empowered to take control of a situation is a highly valued aspect of ambulance care. CONCLUSIONS When responding to a request for 'emergency' help for a low-acuity condition, urgent-care services need to be sensitive to how the patient's emotional and practical perception of the situation may have shaped their decision-making and the influence that carers may have had on the process. There may be novel ways to deliver some of the valued aspects of urgent care, more geared to the resource-limited environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Booker
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Alison R G Shaw
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Huntley AL, Chalder M, Shaw ARG, Hollingworth W, Metcalfe C, Benger JR, Purdy S. A systematic review to identify and assess the effectiveness of alternatives for people over the age of 65 who are at risk of potentially avoidable hospital admission. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016236. [PMID: 28765132 PMCID: PMC5642761 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES There are some older patients who are 'at the decision margin' of admission. This systematic review sought to explore this issue with the following objective: what admission alternatives are there for older patients and are they safe, effective and cost-effective? A secondary objective was to identify the characteristics of those older patients for whom the decision to admit to hospital may be unclear. DESIGN Systematic review of controlled studies (April 2005-December 2016) with searches in Medline, Embase, Cinahl and CENTRAL databases. The protocol is registered at PROSPERO (CRD42015020371). Studies were assessed using Cochrane risk of bias criteria, and relevant reviews were assessed with the AMSTAR tool. The results are presented narratively and discussed. SETTING Primary and secondary healthcare interface. PARTICIPANTS People aged over 65 years at risk of an unplanned admission. INTERVENTIONS Any community-based intervention offered as an alternative to admission to an acute hospital. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURES Reduction in secondary care use, patient-related outcomes, safety and costs. RESULTS Nineteen studies and seven systematic reviews were identified. These recruited patients with both specific conditions and mixed chronic and acute conditions. The interventions involved paramedic/emergency care practitioners (n=3), emergency department-based interventions (n=3), community hospitals (n=2) and hospital-at-home services (n=11). Data suggest that alternatives to admission appear safe with potential to reduce secondary care use and length of time receiving care. There is a lack of patient-related outcomes and cost data. The important features of older patients for whom the decision to admit is uncertain are: age over 75 years, comorbidities/multi-morbidities, dementia, home situation, social support and individual coping abilities. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review describes and assesses evidence on alternatives to acute care for older patients and shows that many of the options available are safe and appear to reduce resource use. However, cost analyses and patient preference data are lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyson L Huntley
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Melanie Chalder
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Brunelcare, Saffron Gardens, Bristol, UK
| | - Ali R G Shaw
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - William Hollingworth
- Health Economics at Bristol, School of Social and Community Medicine University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jonathan Richard Benger
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Huntley A, Chalder M, Heawood A, Metcalfe C, Hollingworth W, Benger J, Purdy S. ALTERNATIVES TO ACUTE HOSPITAL CARE FOR THE OVER 65S AT RISK OF UNPLANNED ADMISSION. Innov Aging 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igx004.2099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A. Huntley
- University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom,
| | - M. Chalder
- University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom,
| | - A. Heawood
- University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom,
| | - C. Metcalfe
- University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom,
| | | | - J. Benger
- University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - S. Purdy
- University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom,
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Busby J, Purdy S, Hollingworth W. How do population, general practice and hospital factors influence ambulatory care sensitive admissions: a cross sectional study. BMC Fam Pract 2017; 18:67. [PMID: 28545412 PMCID: PMC5445441 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-017-0638-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2017] [Accepted: 05/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Background Reducing unplanned hospital admissions is a key priority within the UK and other healthcare systems, however it remains uncertain how this can be achieved. This paper explores the relationship between unplanned ambulatory care sensitive condition (ACSC) admission rates and population, general practice and hospital characteristics. Additionally, we investigated if these factors had a differential impact across 28 conditions. Methods We used the English Hospital Episode Statistics to calculate the number of unplanned ACSC hospital admissions for 28 conditions at 8,029 general practices during 2011/12. We used multilevel negative binomial regression to estimate the influence of population (deprivation), general practice (size, access, continuity, quality, A&E proximity) and hospital (bed availability, % day cases) characteristics on unplanned admission rates after adjusting for age, sex and chronic disease prevalence. Results Practices in deprived areas (at the 90th centile) had 16% (95% confidence interval: 14 to 18) higher admission rates than those in affluent areas (10th centile). Practices with poorer care continuity (9%; 8 to 11), located closest to A&E (8%; 6 to 9), situated in areas with high inpatient bed availability (14%; 10 to 18) or in areas with a larger proportion of day case admissions (17%; 12 to 21) had more admissions. There were smaller associations for primary care access, clinical quality, and practice size. The strength of associations varied by ACSC. For example, deprivation was most strongly associated with alcohol related diseases and COPD admission rates, while continuity of primary care was most strongly associated with admission rates for chronic diseases such as hypertension and iron-deficiency anaemia. Conclusions The drivers of unplanned ACSC admission rates are complex and include population, practice and hospital factors. The importance of these varies markedly across conditions suggesting that multifaceted interventions are required to avoid hospital admissions and reduce costs. Several of the most important drivers of admissions are largely beyond the control of GPs. However, strategies to improve primary care continuity and avoid unnecessary short-stay admissions could lead to improved efficiency. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-017-0638-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Busby
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, BT12 6BA, Belfast, UK.
| | - Sarah Purdy
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, BS8 2PS, Bristol, UK
| | - William Hollingworth
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, BS8 2PS, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Busby J, Purdy S, Hollingworth W. Calculating hospital length of stay using the Hospital Episode Statistics; a comparison of methodologies. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:347. [PMID: 28499377 PMCID: PMC5427566 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2295-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2016] [Accepted: 05/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate calculation of hospital length of stay (LOS) from the English Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) is important for a wide range of audit and research purposes. The two methodologies which are commonly used to achieve this differ in their accuracy and complexity. We compare these methods and make recommendations on when each is most appropriate. METHODS We calculated LOS using continuous inpatient spells (CIPS), which link care spanning across multiple hospitals, and spells, which do not, for six conditions with short (dyspepsia or other stomach function, ENT infection), medium (dehydration and gastroenteritis, perforated or bleeding ulcer), and long (stroke, fractured proximal femur) average LOS. We examined how inter-area comparisons (i.e. benchmarking) and temporal trends differed. We defined a classification system for spells and explored the causes of differences. RESULTS Stroke LOS was 16.5 days using CIPS but 24% (95% CI: 23, 24) lower, at 12.6 days, using spells. Smaller differences existed for shorter-LOS conditions including dehydration and gastroenteritis (4.5 vs. 4.2 days) and ENT infection (0.9 vs. 0.8 days). Typical patient pathways differed markedly between areas and have evolved over time. One area had the third shortest stroke LOS (out of 151) using spells but the fourth longest using CIPS. These issues were most profound for stroke and fractured proximal femur, as patients were frequently transferred to a separate hospital for rehabilitation, however important disparities also existed for conditions with simpler secondary care pathways (e.g. ENT infections, dehydration and gastroenteritis). CONCLUSIONS Spell-based LOS is widely used by researchers and national reporting organisations, including the Health and Social Care Information Centre, however it can substantially underestimate the time patients spend in hospital. A widespread shift to a CIPS methodology is required to improve the quality of LOS estimates and the robustness of research and benchmarking findings. This is vital when investigating clinical areas with typically long, complex patient pathways. Researchers should ensure that their LOS calculation methodology is fully described and explicitly acknowledge weaknesses when appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Busby
- Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK, BT12 6BA.
| | - Sarah Purdy
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, BS8 2PS, Bristol, UK
| | - William Hollingworth
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, BS8 2PS, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
MacKichan F, Brangan E, Wye L, Checkland K, Lasserson D, Huntley A, Morris R, Tammes P, Salisbury C, Purdy S. Why do patients seek primary medical care in emergency departments? An ethnographic exploration of access to general practice. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e013816. [PMID: 28473509 PMCID: PMC5623418 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe how processes of primary care access influence decisions to seek help at the emergency department (ED). DESIGN Ethnographic case study combining non-participant observation, informal and formal interviewing. SETTING Six general practitioner (GP) practices located in three commissioning organisations in England. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS Reception areas at each practice were observed over the course of a working week (73 hours in total). Practice documents were collected and clinical and non-clinical staff were interviewed (n=19). Patients with recent ED use, or a carer if aged 16 and under, were interviewed (n=29). RESULTS Past experience of accessing GP care recursively informed patient decisions about where to seek urgent care, and difficulties with access were implicit in patient accounts of ED use. GP practices had complicated, changeable systems for appointments. This made navigating appointment booking difficult for patients and reception staff, and engendered a mistrust of the system. Increasingly, the telephone was the instrument of demand management, but there were unintended consequences for access. Some patient groups, such as those with English as an additional language, were particularly disadvantaged, and the varying patient and staff semantic of words like 'urgent' and 'emergency' was exacerbated during telephone interactions. Poor integration between in-hours and out-of-hours care and patient perceptions of the quality of care accessible at their GP practice also informed ED use. CONCLUSIONS This study provides important insight into the implicit role of primary care access on the use of ED. Discourses around 'inappropriate' patient demand neglect to recognise that decisions about where to seek urgent care are based on experiential knowledge. Simply speeding up access to primary care or increasing its volume is unlikely to alleviate rising ED use. Systems for accessing care need to be transparent, perceptibly fair and appropriate to the needs of diverse patient groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona MacKichan
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Emer Brangan
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Lesley Wye
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Kath Checkland
- Centre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Daniel Lasserson
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, England
| | - Alyson Huntley
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Richard Morris
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Peter Tammes
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Chris Salisbury
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hollingworth W, Biswas M, Maishman R, Dayer M, McDonagh T, Purdy S, Reeves B, Rogers C, Williams R, Pufulete M. The healthcare costs of heart failure during the last five years of life: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Popul Data Sci 2017. [PMCID: PMC9351049 DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v1i1.339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
44
|
Voss S, Black S, Brandling J, Buswell M, Cheston R, Cullum S, Kirby K, Purdy S, Solway C, Taylor H, Benger J. Home or hospital for people with dementia and one or more other multimorbidities: What is the potential to reduce avoidable emergency admissions? The HOMEWARD Project Protocol. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016651. [PMID: 28373259 PMCID: PMC5387974 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Older people with multimorbidities frequently access 999 ambulance services. When multimorbidities include dementia, the risk of ambulance use, accident and emergency (A&E) attendance and hospital admission are all increased, even when a condition is treatable in the community. People with dementia tend to do poorly in the acute hospital setting and hospital admission can result in adverse outcomes. This study aims to provide an evidence-based understanding of how older people living with dementia and other multimorbidities are using emergency ambulance services. It will also provide evidence of how paramedics make decisions about taking this group of patients to hospital, and what resources would allow them to make more person-focused decisions to enable optimal patient care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Phase 1: retrospective data analysis: quantitative analysis of ambulance service data will investigate: how often paramedics are called to older people with dementia; the amount of time paramedics spend on scene and the frequency with which these patients are transported to hospital. Phase 2: observational case studies: detailed case studies will be compiled using qualitative methods, including non-participant observation of paramedic decision-making, to understand why older people with multimorbidities including dementia are conveyed to A&E when they could be treated at home or in the community. Phase 3: needs analysis: nominal groups with paramedics will investigate and prioritise the resources that would allow emergency, urgent and out of hours care to be effectively delivered to these patients at home or in a community setting. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Approval for the study has been obtained from the Health Research Authority (HRA) with National Health Service (NHS) Research Ethics Committee approval for phase 2 (16/NW/0803). The dissemination strategy will include publishing findings in appropriate journals, at conferences and in newsletters. We will pay particular attention to dissemination to the public, dementia organisations and ambulance services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Voss
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - S Black
- Research and Development Department, South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - J Brandling
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - M Buswell
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - R Cheston
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - S Cullum
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - K Kirby
- Research and Development Department, South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - S Purdy
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - C Solway
- Alzheimer's Society Research Network, London, UK
| | - H Taylor
- Research Design Service South West, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - J Benger
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Affiliation(s)
- John Busby
- Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University, Belfast BT12 6BA
| | - William Hollingworth
- Professor of Health Economics, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Professor of Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Creavin ST, Noel-Storr AH, Richard E, Creavin AL, Cullum S, Ben-Shlomo Y, Purdy S. Clinical judgement by primary care physicians for the diagnosis of all-cause dementia or cognitive impairment in symptomatic people. Hippokratia 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sam T Creavin
- University of Bristol; School of Social and Community Medicine; Carynge Hall 39 Whatley Road Bristol UK BS8 2PS
| | - Anna H Noel-Storr
- University of Oxford; Radcliffe Department of Medicine; Room 4401c (4th Floor) John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington Oxford UK OX3 9DU
| | - Edo Richard
- Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center; Department of Neurology; Nijmegen Netherlands
| | - Alexandra L Creavin
- University of Bristol; School of Social and Community Medicine; Carynge Hall 39 Whatley Road Bristol UK BS8 2PS
| | - Sarah Cullum
- University of Auckland; Department of Psychological Medicine; Auckland New Zealand 1142
| | - Yoav Ben-Shlomo
- Canynge Hall; Dept of Social Medicine; Whiteladies Road Bristol UK BS8 2PR
| | - Sarah Purdy
- University of Bristol; Faculty of Health Sciences; Senate House, Tyndall Avenue Bristol UK BS8 1TH
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Mohiuddin S, Reeves B, Pufulete M, Maishman R, Dayer M, Macleod J, McDonagh T, Purdy S, Rogers C, Hollingworth W. Model-based cost-effectiveness analysis of B-type natriuretic peptide-guided care in patients with heart failure. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e014010. [PMID: 28031211 PMCID: PMC5223729 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Monitoring B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) to guide pharmacotherapy might improve survival in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the cost-effectiveness of BNP-guided care is uncertain and guidelines do not uniformly recommend it. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of BNP-guided care in patient subgroups defined by age and ejection fraction. METHODS We used a Markov model with a 3-month cycle length to estimate the lifetime health service costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental net monetary benefits (iNMBs) of BNP-guided versus clinically guided care in 3 patient subgroups: (1) HFrEF patients <75 years; (2) HFpEF patients <75 years; and (3) HFrEF patients ≥75 years. There is no evidence of benefit in patients with HFpEF aged ≥75 years. We used individual patient data meta-analyses and linked primary care, hospital and mortality data to inform the key model parameters. We performed probabilistic analysis to assess the uncertainty in model results. RESULTS In younger patients (<75 years) with HFrEF, the mean QALYs (5.57 vs 5.02) and costs (£63 527 vs £58 139) were higher with BNP-guided care. At the willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per QALY, the positive iNMB (£5424 (95% CI £987 to £9469)) indicates that BNP-guided care is cost-effective in this subgroup. The evidence of cost-effectiveness of BNP-guided care is less strong for younger patients with HFpEF (£3155 (-£10 307 to £11 613)) and older patients (≥75 years) with HFrEF (£2267 (-£1524 to £6074)). BNP-guided care remained cost-effective in the sensitivity analyses, albeit the results were sensitive to assumptions on its sustained effect. CONCLUSIONS We found strong evidence that BNP-guided care is a cost-effective alternative to clinically guided care in younger patients with HFrEF. It is potentially cost-effective in younger patients with HFpEF and older patients with HFrEF, but more evidence is required, particularly with respect to the frequency, duration and BNP target for monitoring. Cost-effectiveness results from trials in specialist settings cannot be generalised to primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed Mohiuddin
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Barnaby Reeves
- School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Maria Pufulete
- School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rachel Maishman
- School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Mark Dayer
- NHS Practice, Taunton and Somerset NHS Trust, Somerset, UK
| | - John Macleod
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Theresa McDonagh
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Chris Rogers
- School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Creavin ST, Cullum SJ, Haworth J, Wye L, Bayer A, Fish M, Purdy S, Ben-Shlomo Y. Erratum to: Towards improving diagnosis of memory loss in general practice: TIMeLi diagnostic test accuracy study protocol. BMC Fam Pract 2016; 17:119. [PMID: 27565138 PMCID: PMC5002196 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-016-0510-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2016] [Accepted: 08/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
50
|
Busby J, Purdy S, Hollingworth W. Using geographic variation in unplanned ambulatory care sensitive condition admission rates to identify commissioning priorities: an analysis of routine data from England. J Health Serv Res Policy 2016; 22:20-27. [PMID: 27827306 DOI: 10.1177/1355819616666397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To use geographic variation in unplanned ambulatory care sensitive condition admission rates to identify the clinical areas and patient subgroups where there is greatest potential to prevent admissions and improve the quality and efficiency of care. Methods We used English Hospital Episode Statistics data from 2011/2012 to describe the characteristics of patients admitted for ambulatory care sensitive condition care and estimated geographic variation in unplanned admission rates. We contrasted geographic variation across admissions with different lengths of stay which we used as a proxy for clinical severity. We estimated the number of bed days that could be saved under several scenarios. Results There were 1.8 million ambulatory care sensitive condition admissions during 2011/2012. Substantial geographic variation in ambulatory care sensitive condition admission rates was commonplace but mental health care and short-stay (<2 days) admissions were particularly variable. Reducing rates in the highest use areas could lead to savings of between 0.4 and 2.8 million bed days annually. Conclusions Widespread geographic variations in admission rates for conditions where admission is potentially avoidable should concern commissioners and could be symptomatic of inefficient care. Further work to explore the causes of these differences is required and should focus on mental health and short-stay admissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Busby
- 1 Currently Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, UK; previously PhD Student, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- 2 Professor of Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, UK
| | - William Hollingworth
- 3 Professor of Health Economics, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|