"I didn't fight for my life to be treated like this!": The relationship between the experience of cancer and intimate partner abuse

Intimate partner violence in women with cancer: An integrative review

Objective

This study aims to estimate the incidence of intimate partner violence (IPV) among women cancer survivors and identify associated factors.

Methods

Using Whittemore and Knafl's integrative review method, we synthesized literature on the association between IPV and cancer in women.

Results

We conducted a comprehensive search of literature published between 2003 and 2024 across eight databases, resulting in 24 English-language articles. These articles included qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method studies. Our synthesis identified several factors influencing the relationship between IPV and cancer, including sociodemographic factors (e.g., age and income), health-related factors, lifestyle-related factors (such as life experiences and interpersonal relationships), cancer-related factors (including type and treatment), and cancer screening behaviors.

Conclusions

The study highlights that various factors contribute to the prevalence of IPV among women with cancer. Particularly vulnerable are younger patients, those with lower incomes, and those with more severe disease manifestations. Healthcare professionals should assess for IPV risk during medical consultations and ensure access to appropriate support services.

Incidence and risk factors of intimate partner violence among patients with gynaecological cancer in China

AIM

The aim of this study is to examine the incidence and risk factors for intimate partner violence (IPV) among patients with gynaecological cancer.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study design was employed.

METHODS

Patients with gynaecological cancer were recruited from a tertiary hospital in Shandong, China. Eligible patients completed a survey including questions regarding their demographic and cancer-related characteristics, IPV experience and dyadic coping.

RESULTS

A total of 429 patients were surveyed, 31% of them reported previous experiences with IPV, and negotiation was the most common type reported. The following variables were associated with IPV: a husband, wife and child/children family structure; a husband, wife, child/children and parent-in-law family structure; an annual household income ≥¥50,000 ($7207); and a similar or greater income earned by the patient than by her partner.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

IPV in patients with gynaecological cancer is investigated in this study.

Abuse, cancer and sexual dysfunction in women: A potentially vicious cycle

More than 30% of women have a history of abuse. Women with cancer may be at substantially increased risk for abuse, but this issue is rarely discussed in the course of oncology care. Women with a history of abuse who present for cancer care commonly have a high prevalence of co-morbid illness. Sexual dysfunction, a highly prevalent but under-recognized condition among women of all ages, is also more common among both women with a history of abuse and women with cancer. Although common after cancer, sexual dysfunction, like abuse, can be stigmatizing and often goes undiagnosed and untreated. This review first examines the literature for evidence of a relationship between any history of abuse and cancer among women, addressing two questions: 1) How does abuse promote or create risk for developing cancer? 2) How does cancer increase a woman's susceptibility to abuse? We then examine evidence for a relationship between abuse and female sexual dysfunction, followed by an investigation of the complex relationship between all three factors: abuse, sexual dysfunction and cancer. The literature is limited by a lack of harmonization of measures across studies, retrospective designs, and small and idiosyncratic samples. Despite these limitations, it is imperative that providers integrate the knowledge of this complex relationship into the care of women with cancer.

Partner interfering behaviors affecting cancer quality of life

Objective

Because partners are an important and unpaid resource in cancer care, understanding how destructive, controlling or interfering partner behaviors influence women's cancer care may be particularly relevant for health care providers seeking to provide cancer care and enhance recovery. Using a new measure of partner interfering behaviors in cancer care (PIB‐C), we investigated whether women with a recent cancer diagnosis who additionally endorsed any PIB‐C would report (a) more symptoms of depression and stress, and (b) lower Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT‐G) and lower Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy‐Spiritual Well‐being (FACIT‐SP) scale scores indicating poorer quality of life (QOL).

Methods

Women aged 18–79 included in cancer registries as having an incident, primary, biopsy‐confirmed cancer in the past 12 months were eligible for this study. Consenting women completed a phone interview 9–12 months following cancer diagnosis between 2009 and 2015. Interviews provided data to measure outcomes (perceived stress and depressive symptoms, FACIT‐SP and FACT‐G scores), partner supportive and interfering behaviors, and other potentially confounding factors.

Results

Of the 2376 women in a relationship at cancer diagnosis, 14.7% endorsed one or more of 14 PIB‐C items. Women endorsing any PIB‐C item reported more symptoms of depression and stress and lower FACT‐G and FACIT‐SP scores than partnered women reporting no PIB‐C even when controlling for partner supportive behaviors and lifetime intimate partner violence. Increasing PIB‐C scores were also correlated, in a dose–response pattern, with these same outcomes.

Conclusions

Partner interfering behaviors during cancer care impact patients' QOL across multiple domains. © 2016 The Authors. Psycho‐Oncology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.