1
|
Jacxsens L, Coveney C, Culley L, Lafuente-Funes S, Pennings G, Hudson N, Provoost V. The representation of medical risks and incentives concerning egg donation: an analysis of the websites of fertility clinics of Belgium, Spain and the UK. HUM FERTIL 2024; 27:2380667. [PMID: 39056152 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2024.2380667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
Considering the growing demand for egg donation (ED) and the scarcity of women coming forward as donors to meet this demand, scholars have expressed concerns that clinics may (initially) misrepresent risks to recruit more donors. Additionally, (non-)monetary incentives might be used to try to influence potential donors, which may pressure these women or cause them to dismiss their concerns. Since the internet is often the first source of information and first impressions influence individuals' choices, we examined the websites of fertility clinics to explore how they present medical risks, incentives and emotional appeals. Content Analysis and Frame Analysis were used to analyze a sample of Belgian, Spanish and UK clinic websites. The data show that the websites mainly focus on extreme and dangerous risks and side effects (e.g. severe OHSS) even though it is highly relevant for donors to be informed about less severe but more frequently occurring risks and side effects (e.g. bloating), since those influence donors' daily functioning. The altruistic narrative of ED in Europe was dominant in the data, although some (hidden) financial incentives were found on Spanish and UK websites. Nonetheless, all information about financial incentives still were presented subtly or in combination with altruistic incentives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Jacxsens
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - C Coveney
- Criminology, Sociology & Social Policy, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - L Culley
- Centre for Reproduction Research, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| | - S Lafuente-Funes
- Institut für Soziologie, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - G Pennings
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - N Hudson
- Centre for Reproduction Research, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| | - V Provoost
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pennings G, Heindryckx B, Stoop D, Mertes H. Attitude of Belgian women towards enucleated egg donation for treatment of mitochondrial diseases and infertility. Reprod Biomed Online 2024; 49:104101. [PMID: 38943811 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Revised: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/01/2024]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION What is the attitude of Belgian women of reproductive age towards enucleated egg donation? Does the willingness of women to donate differ when they would donate enucleated or whole eggs? DESIGN In 2022, an online survey was conducted among a representative sample of 1000 women in Belgium aged 18-50 years. The item on willingness to anonymously donate enucleated eggs was dichotomized into those willing to donate and those not willing to donate or uncertain. RESULTS No statistically significant difference was found between the willingness to donate enucleated eggs and whole eggs (whether anonymously or identifiably). Anonymity, however, affected the willingness to donate, with considerably fewer women willing to donate identifiably. The respondents were divided about their parental status if they were to donate enucleated eggs, with less than one-half (44%) not considering themselves to be a genetic mother. Women willing to donate enucleated eggs anonymously were less likely to view themselves as a genetic mother of the child compared with others. Fewer than one in five considered the technique unacceptable because the resulting child would carry genetic material of three persons. CONCLUSIONS Women in the general population did not show a greater willingness to donate enucleated eggs than whole eggs. The fact that the respondents were strongly divided on whether or not they would consider themselves to be a genetic mother of the resulting child may explain this result. Other factors, such as the potential high risk for the child, may also have contributed to less willingness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Pennings
- Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, B-9000 Gent, Belgium.
| | - Björn Heindryckx
- Ghent-Fertility And Stem cell Team (G-FaST), Department for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Dominic Stoop
- Ghent-Fertility and Stem Cell Team (G-FaST), Department for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Heidi Mertes
- Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gruchala P, Keller L, Ducrocq-Caux B, Ramdane N, Robin G, Catteau-Jonard S. [Impact of donor parity on oocyte donation outcomes]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE, FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE 2024; 52:81-85. [PMID: 37925104 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2023.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Since 2015, in France, men and women who have never procreated are allowed to donate their gametes. This has led to an increase in the number of female oocyte donors, whereas there are many couples waiting for gametes that have a long waiting time. The aim of this study is to compare the results of donation with oocytes from nulliparous and non-nulliparous donors. METHODS Monocentric retrospective observational study (Lille University Hospital) between January 1st, 2016 and December 31st, 2019. Phenotypic characteristics and clinical and biological outcomes of oocytes donations were compared according to donor parity (nulliparous versus primiparous or multiparous). RESULTS One hundred and eighty-five donors (66 nulliparous and 119 non-nulliparous) were included in the study, allowing 284 ICSI cycles to be performed in recipient couples. On average, 11.5 oocytes were obtained per donation cycle, of which 7.8 were mature. In total, 4.6 mature oocytes were obtained per attempt and per recipient couple. Nulliparous donors are younger than non-nulliparous ones. An early pregnancy was obtained in 55.6% of the nulliparous donors and in 50.8% of the non-nulliparous donors (P=0.55). A progressive pregnancy was obtained in 49.2% of the nulliparous women and in 42.1% of the non-nulliparous women (P=0.36). There was therefore no difference in terms of early pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy whether the donation came from a nulliparous or non-nulliparous woman. CONCLUSION Donor parity does not seem to have an impact on the success of oocyte donation attempts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura Keller
- Laboratoire de biologie de la reproduction, CECOS, spermiologie, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Bérengère Ducrocq-Caux
- Laboratoire de biologie de la reproduction, CECOS, spermiologie, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Nassima Ramdane
- Département de biostatistiques, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Geoffroy Robin
- Service d'AMP, CHU de Lille, université de Lille, 59000 Lille, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Seifer DB, Wang SF, Frankfurter D. Cumulative live birth rates with autologous oocytes plateau with fewer number of cycles for each year of age > 42. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2023; 21:94. [PMID: 37872609 PMCID: PMC10591412 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-023-01144-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To disaggregate the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) age category of " > 42" and compare age-stratified cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) > 42 years old. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study of autologous linked ART cycles. SETTING United States (US) National ART Database. PATIENT(S) Women > 42 years old without a history of prior ART cycles who underwent ART between 2014-2020 as reported to the SART CORS database. INTERVENTION(S) Disaggregate the SART CORS age category of " > 42" into age-stratified cumulative live birth rates (CLBR). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Age-stratified cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) for women ≥ 43 years old. RESULTS Between 2014-2020, 24,650 women > 42 years old without history of prior ART underwent 58,132 cycles, resulting in 1,982 live births. Women ages 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, ≥ 50 achieved maximal CLBR of 9.7%, 8.6%, 5.0%, 3.6%, 2.5%, 1.5%, 2.7%, 1.3%, respectively. CLBR for women between 43-45 were significantly higher compared to those 46 and older (p < 0.05). Among women 46 and older, CLBR were not significantly different. Women ages 43 and 44 did not exhibit a significant increase in CLBR beyond the 5th cycle. Age 45 and 46 reached CLBR plateau by the 3rd cycle. Age ≥ 47 CLBR plateaued after the first cycle. After adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, BMI, nulliparity, etiology of infertility, number of oocytes retrieved, embryos transferred, blastocyst transfer, use of ICSI, PGT, and ART treatment cycle number, there was no association between markers of ovarian reserve (day 3 FSH and random AMH levels) and live birth for women > 42. CONCLUSIONS While CLBR of autologous cycles from women 42 or younger generally plateau by cycle number 5, age-stratified cycles from women > 42 plateau after fewer cycles to maximize CLBR. Patient and physician expectations for maximum CLBR beyond 42 may be practically based on fewer planned cycles before reaching an age-specific CLBR plateau than may have been previously expected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B Seifer
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale Fertility Center 200 West Campus Drive Orange, Orange, CT, USA.
| | - Sarah F Wang
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale Fertility Center 200 West Campus Drive Orange, Orange, CT, USA
| | - David Frankfurter
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale Fertility Center 200 West Campus Drive Orange, Orange, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Caughey LE, White KM, Lensen S, Peate M. Elective egg freezers' disposition decisions: a qualitative study. Fertil Steril 2023:S0015-0282(23)00151-6. [PMID: 37032273 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the factors that influence elective egg freezers' disposition decisions toward their surplus-frozen oocytes. DESIGN Qualitative. SETTING Not applicable. PATIENT(S) Thirty-one participants: 7 past; 6 current; and 18 future oocyte disposition decision-makers. INTERVENTION(S) Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Qualitative thematic analysis of interview transcripts. RESULTS Six inter-related themes were identified related to the decision-making process which are as follows: decisions are dynamic; triggers for the final decision; achieving motherhood; conceptualization of oocytes; the impacts of egg donation on others; and external factors affecting the final disposition outcome. All women reported a type of trigger event for making a final decision (e.g., completing their family). Women who achieved motherhood were more open to donating their oocytes to others but were concerned about the implications for their child and felt responsibility for potential donor children. Women who did not achieve motherhood were unlikely to donate to others due to the grief of not becoming a mother, often feeling alone, misunderstood, and unsupported. Reclaiming oocytes (e.g., taking them home) and closure ceremonies helped some women process their grief. Donating to research was viewed as an altruistic option as oocytes would not be wasted and did not have the "complication" of a genetically-linked child. There was a general lack of knowledge around disposition options at all stages of the process. CONCLUSION(S) Oocyte disposition decisions are dynamic and complex for women, exacerbated by a general lack of understanding of these options. The final decision is framed by: whether women achieved motherhood, dealing with grief if they did not achieve motherhood, and considering the complexities of donating to others. Additional decision support through counseling, decision aids, and early consideration of disposition when eggs are initially stored may help women make informed decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy E Caughey
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Katherine M White
- School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sarah Lensen
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Combs A, Kimes MJ, Jaslow CR, Hayes H, O'Leary LB, Levy MJ, Kutteh WH. Perception of pain and the oocyte donor experience: A retrospective analysis of commercial U.S. donors. Reprod Biomed Online 2022; 45:906-912. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
7
|
Bracewell-Milnes T, Holland JC, Jones BP, Saso S, Almeida P, Maclaran K, Norman-Taylor J, Nikolaou D, Shah NM, Johnson M, Thum MY. Exploring the knowledge and attitudes of women of reproductive age from the general public towards egg donation and egg sharing: a UK-based study. Hum Reprod 2021; 36:2189-2201. [PMID: 34227667 PMCID: PMC8648294 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What are the knowledge and views of UK-based women towards egg donation (ED) and egg sharing (ES)? SUMMARY ANSWER Lacking knowledge of the practices of ED and ES could be an influential factor in donor egg shortages, rather than negative perceptions or lack of donor anonymity and financial incentives. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The increasing age of women trying to conceive has led to donor egg shortages, with ED and ES failing to meet demand. Indeed, in recent years in the UK, ES numbers have fallen. This results in long waiting lists, forcing patients abroad for fertility treatment to take up cross border reproductive care. Previous research suggests a lack of knowledge of ED among members of the general public; however, no study has yet assessed knowledge or views of ES in the general public. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Six hundred and thirty-five UK-based women over 18 years were voluntarily recruited from social media community groups by convenience sampling. The recruitment period was from February to April 2020. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Participants completed a previously validated questionnaire regarding female fertility, ED and ES, including knowledge, perceptions and approval of the practices and relevant legislation. This included ranking key benefits and issues regarding egg sharing. The questionnaire was completed using the online Qualtrics survey software. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Regarding knowledge of ED and ES, 56.3% and 79.8%, respectively had little or no prior knowledge. Upon explanation, most approved of ED (85.8%) and ES (70.4%). A greater proportion of respondents would donate to a family member/friend (49.75%) than to an anonymous recipient (35.80%). Overall, ES was viewed less favourably than ED, with ethical and practical concerns highlighted. Women aged 18-30 years were significantly more likely to approve of egg donation practice compared to those aged >30 years (P < 0.0001). Those against ES found fears of financial coercion or negative psychological wellbeing the most concerning. About 35.8% and 49.7% would personally consider anonymous and known ED, respectively, whilst 56.7% would consider ES. Those answering in favour of egg sharing were significantly more likely to give higher benefit ratings compared to those against the practice (P < 0.001). Most agreed (55.8%) with and were not deterred to donate (60.1%) by the 'Disclosure of Donor Identity' legislation. Only 31.6% agreed with the compensatory cap; however, 52.7% would not be more motivated to donate by an increased cap. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION There were several limitations of the study, including the use of convenience sampling and the voluntary nature of participation opening the study up to sampling and participation bias. Finally, closed questions were predominantly used to allow the generation of quantitative data and statistical analysis. However, this approach prevented opinion justification and qualitative analysis, limiting the depth of conclusions drawn. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS To our knowledge, this is the first study to survey the general public's knowledge and views of ED/ES using a previously validated questionnaire. The conclusion that lack of knowledge could be contributing to the current donor shortfall in the UK demonstrates that campaigns to inform women of the practices are necessary to alleviate donor oocyte shortages. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funds were used for this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- Assisted Conception Unit, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.,Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - James C Holland
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Benjamin P Jones
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Paula Almeida
- Assisted Conception Unit, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Kate Maclaran
- Assisted Conception Unit, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | - Nishel M Shah
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Mark Johnson
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK.,The Lister Hospital, The Lister Fertility Clinic, London, UK
| | - Meen-Yau Thum
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK.,The Lister Hospital, The Lister Fertility Clinic, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tober D, Garibaldi C, Blair A, Baltzell K. Alignment between expectations and experiences of egg donors: what does it mean to be informed? REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE & SOCIETY ONLINE 2021; 12:1-13. [PMID: 33024845 PMCID: PMC7530253 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
This study evaluated the retrospective perceptions of egg donors regarding information communicated about immediate and long-term risks during the process of becoming an egg donor, and the alignment of that perception with their experiences and expectations of egg donation. Data were collected using an anonymous online survey. Egg donors' demographics, perceptions of being informed about immediate complications and long-term risks, and alignment between their expectations and experiences were analysed. In total, 375 current and former egg donors participated in an online survey about their decisions and experiences. Participants ranged in age from 18 to 57 years, with a median age of 24 years at first donation for compensated donors. The majority of the participants (81%) provided eggs in the USA, and 86.1% reported being compensated beyond direct reimbursement. Overall, 66% of egg donors surveyed reported feeling that their experiences matched their expectations based upon what they had been told during the informed consent process. While most participants (64.8%) felt well informed about potential short-term risks, 55.2% did not feel well informed about potential long-term risks. The findings indicate that while the majority of egg donors felt informed about immediate complications, there are gaps in knowledge about potential long-term risks. Results from this research provide insight into how egg donors understand risks and benefits, and can be used to improve counselling and informed consent forms and processes. The findings also indicate that longitudinal research on the health and well-being of egg donors is needed in order to improve informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane Tober
- Institute for Health and Aging, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health and Department of Anthropology, History and Social Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christina Garibaldi
- Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alden Blair
- Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kimberly Baltzell
- Department of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kretz M, Ohl J, Letur H, Guivarch A, Catteau-Jonard S, De Mouzon J. [Comparative survey of French oocyte donor's profile and motivations between nulliparous and multiparous donors, 2017-2018]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE, FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE 2020; 48:736-745. [PMID: 32289498 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Since the authorization of French nulliparous women to donate oocytes, who are the new donors? What are the similar and differential points with the initial donors who have already procreated? METHODS Retrospective multicenter cohort study using a questionnaire. RESULTS The return rate is 90.7% with 248 donor files from 5 French assisted reproductive technology (ART) centers, included between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018. The average age is 31,0 years. More than two thirds of women have a higher educational level than the license. Donation is spontaneous or relational in 69% and 25% of cases, respectively. Among nulliparous donors, 37% don't know the possibility of self-preservation but after information, 80% wish to benefit from it versus 32% of multiparous women if they were given the opportunity. CONCLUSIONS This study by the Study Group for Egg Donation (GEDO) highlights the particularities of French oocytes donors. The 2015 decree allowed to diversify the origin of the donation, which remains mainly altruistic but the possibility of self-preservation for nulliparous donors also seems to motivate women. This link between donation and self-preservation poses an ethical problem that needs to be approached and resolved in the next Bioethics Law framing Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Kretz
- Service de Gynécologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, avenue Molière, 67000 Strasbourg.
| | - J Ohl
- Service d'Assistance Médicale à la Procréation (CMCO), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, rue Louis Pasteur, 67300 Schiltigheim.
| | - H Letur
- Service d'Assistance Médicale à la Procréation - Préservation de la Fertilité, Polyclinique de Navarre, boulevard Haute rive, 64000 Pau.
| | - A Guivarch
- Clinique La Sagesse, 3, place Saint Guenole, 35000 Rennes.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Oocyte donor's emotions towards the potential offspring: Development and psychometric properties. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 252:313-316. [PMID: 32652481 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Revised: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to develop a questionnaire for assessing the emotional feelings of the women donors towards the potential offspring resulting from assisted reproductive techniques. STUDY DESIGN Construct validity was evaluated in a cross-sectional study of 150 Iranian oocyte-donating women who undergoing donor egg programs in Isfahan- Iran. The self-report questionnaire was completed within one to ten days after the oocyte donation. Reliability was determined using internal consistency and stability. RESULTS The results of the factor analysis were extracted with 3 factors with a predictive power of 89.57 % in 12 items. The internal reliability of the questionnaire was calculated based on Cronbach's alpha coefficient 0.792. The stability of the questionnaire was confirmed based on intra class correlation index (0.71). CONCLUSION The 12-item questionnaire is a valid tool for assessing the emotions of oocyte donors shortly after doing donor egg programs.
Collapse
|
11
|
Gleicher N, Barad DH, Adashi EY. Why is use of donor eggs not viewed as treatment failure? A call for improvements in treatments with autologous oocytes. J Assist Reprod Genet 2020; 37:1583-1588. [PMID: 32504304 PMCID: PMC7376996 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01847-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Based on national registry reports, after age 42, the number of IVF cycles utilizing autologous oocytes is very small; after age 43, autologous oocyte use in US IVF cycles is almost non-existent. We here argue that the in vitro fertilization (IVF) field has created a self-fulfilling prophecy by basically abandoning the utilization of autologous oocytes after ages 42-43 years. This not only resulted in almost no IVF cycles with autologous oocytes being performed but also in abandonment of research that could lead to improvements in IVF outcomes in older women when using autologous oocytes. As a consequence, IVF has largely stagnated in this area. We further argue that third-party oocyte donation in clinical IVF should be considered a treatment failure, as it requires patients to choose a second rather than a first-choice treatment. Such a redesignation of third-party egg donation would not only be appropriate but could lead to necessary changes in physician attitudes, considering that women almost exclusively prefer to conceive with their autologous oocytes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Gleicher
- The Center for Human Reproduction, 21 East 69th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
- Foundation for Reproductive Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
- Stem Cell Biology and Molecular Embryology Laboratory, The Rockefeller University, New York, USA.
- Department of Obstetrics and Genecology, Vienna University of Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
| | - David H Barad
- The Center for Human Reproduction, 21 East 69th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA
- Foundation for Reproductive Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eli Y Adashi
- The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cordier C, Ducrocq B, Fry J, Catteau-Jonard S. Views of French oocyte donors at least 3 years after donation. Reprod Biomed Online 2020; 40:819-826. [PMID: 32295744 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Revised: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION The study aimed to evaluate the percentage of oocyte donors who regretted their donation at least 3 years later. DESIGN Between December 2018 and January 2019, this single-centre study sought to contact by telephone all women who had donated oocytes during the 6-year period from 2010 to 2015 at the Lille Centre for the study and storage of eggs and spermatozoa (CECOS). RESULTS Among 118 women, 72 responded to the questionnaire by telephone and were included in the study. The response rate was 61%. No woman regretted having donated an oocyte, and 89% said that they would do it again in the same situation. The survey distinguished two types of donors: 'relational' (58%) and 'altruistic' (42%); some of their responses differed. Ninety per cent of the women had talked about the donation to family and friends. Among them, 74% felt supported by their family and friends, and 72% by their partner. The donation was something that 76% of the women sometimes thought about; 83% felt that this donation was something useful that they had accomplished. Finally, most donors felt that oocyte donation should remain unremunerated and anonymous. CONCLUSIONS None of the donors we interviewed regretted their donation. In France, the current principles governing this donation appear satisfactory to oocyte donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Cordier
- Université de Lille, CHU Lille, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Lille, France.
| | | | - Julie Fry
- Cellules d'Urgence Médico-Psychologiques SAMU 62, CECOS de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Sophie Catteau-Jonard
- Université de Lille, CHU Lille, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Lille, France; Université de Lille, CHU Lille, INSERM U1172, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Goedeke S, Shepherd D, Rodino IS. Support for recognition and payment options for egg and sperm donation in New Zealand and Australia. Hum Reprod 2020; 35:117-129. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Revised: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION
To what extent do infertility clinic patients, fertility industry professionals and members of the public support different forms of payment and recognition for egg and sperm donation?
SUMMARY ANSWER
While participants expressed support for reimbursement of expenses for both egg and sperm donation, payment constituting explicit financial advantage was regarded less favourably although potentially necessary to address donor gamete shortages.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
In both New Zealand and Australia, commercial inducement for the supply of gametes is prohibited. This prohibition has been argued to contribute to limited availability of donor gametes with the effect of increasing waiting lists and/or the pursuit of potentially unregulated cross-border reproductive care by domestic patients requiring donor gametes.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
The study was a mixed methods study drawing on data from a questionnaire completed by 434 participants from across New Zealand and Australia between November 2018 and March 2019.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
Stakeholders involved in donor-assisted conception (past and present infertility patients, gamete recipients and donors), fertility industry professionals and members of the public were recruited following online advertisement of the study. All participants spoke English and primarily identified as Caucasian. Participants anonymously completed an online questionnaire gauging their support for a range of recognition and payment options. Dependent samples t-tests were used to probe for differences in support of recognition and payment options in relation to egg and sperm donation. Linear regression models were used to determine factors predicting support for the different options for both egg and sperm donation. Thematic analysis was used to identify main themes in free text question responses.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
Broadly, there was agreement that donors be reimbursed for medical expenses, travel time, unpaid time away from work relating to treatments and out-of-pocket expenses directly related to the gamete donation process, with greater support suggested for egg versus sperm donors. Items gauging support for non-material recognition and tokens of thanks for donations were not significantly different between egg and sperm donation programmes (P > 0.05) nor rated as highly as reimbursement alternatives. Lowest ratings of support were indicated for the outright payment or reward of donors for the supply of their gametes, options that would leave donors in better financial positions. Qualitatively, themes valuing gamete donation as ideally relating to gifting were identified, although counterbalanced in opinion by concepts of fairness in reimbursing gamete donors for their costs. Where payment over and above the reimbursement of costs was supported, this was related to pragmatic considerations of limited supply of donor gametes.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION
This study used a cross-sectional design and consequently causal inferences cannot be made. Additionally, participants particularly professional fertility staff, were required to self-report on politically sensitive and legal issues with the potential for social desirability response bias. Snowball sampling may have led to participation of like-minded individuals, thus limiting generalizations of findings.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
In a climate of global commercialization of reproductive medicine, limited donor gamete availability and rising incidences of cross-border reproductive care, the findings of this study can be used as a basis for further discussion between regulators and professional industry stakeholders with respect to shaping ethical policy and practice relating to donor conception.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
No external funds were sought for this work. None of the authors have any competing interests to declare.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Goedeke
- Department of Psychology, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Daniel Shepherd
- Department of Psychology, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
McSweeney B, Allegretti JR, Fischer M, Xu H, Goodman KJ, Monaghan T, McLeod C, Mullish BH, Petrof EO, Phelps EL, Chis R, Edmison A, Juby A, Ennis-Davis R, Roach B, Wong K, Kao D. In search of stool donors: a multicenter study of prior knowledge, perceptions, motivators, and deterrents among potential donors for fecal microbiota transplantation. Gut Microbes 2019; 11:51-62. [PMID: 31122134 PMCID: PMC6973337 DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2019.1611153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a highly effective therapy for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Stool donors are essential, but difficult to recruit and retain. We aimed to identify factors influencing willingness to donate stool. This multi-center study with a 32-item questionnaire targeted young adults and health care workers via social media and university email lists in Edmonton and Kingston, Canada; London and Nottingham, England; and Indianapolis and Boston, USA. Items included baseline demographics and FMT knowledge and perception. Investigated motivators and deterrents included economic compensation, screening process, time commitment, and stool donation logistics. Logistic regression and linear regression models estimated associations of study variables with self-assessed willingness to donate stool. 802 respondents completed our questionnaire: 387 (48.3%) age 21-30 years, 573 (71.4%) female, 323 (40%) health care workers. Country of residence, age and occupation were not associated with willingness to donate stool. Factors increasing willingness to donate were: already a blood donor (OR 1.64), male, altruism, economic benefit, knowledge of how FMT can help patients (OR 1.32), and positive attitudes towards FMT (OR 1.39). Factors decreasing willingness to donate were: stool collection unpleasant (OR 0.92), screening process invasive (OR 0.92), higher stool donation frequency, negative social perception of stool, and logistics of collection/transporting feces. We conclude that 1) blood donors and males are more willing to consider stool donation; 2) altruism, economic compensation, and positive feedback are motivators; and 3) screening process, high donation frequency, logistics of collection/transporting feces, lack of public awareness, and negative social perception are deterrents. Considering these variables could maximize donor recruitment and retention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Breanna McSweeney
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jessica R. Allegretti
- Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Monika Fischer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Huiping Xu
- Department of Biostatistics, The Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health and School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Karen J. Goodman
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Tanya Monaghan
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Carmen McLeod
- Nottingham Synthetic Biology Research Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Benjamin H. Mullish
- Division of Integrative Systems Medicine and Digestive Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Elaine O. Petrof
- Department of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emmalee L. Phelps
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Roxana Chis
- Department of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Abby Edmison
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Angela Juby
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ralph Ennis-Davis
- Department of Medicine, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Brandi Roach
- Zeidler Ledcor Center, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Karen Wong
- Zeidler Ledcor Center, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Dina Kao
- Zeidler Ledcor Center, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada,CONTACT Dina Kao Zeidler Ledcor Center, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Platts S, Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Jones B, Parikh R, Thum MY. Investigating attitudes towards oocyte donation amongst potential donors and the general population: a systematic review. HUM FERTIL 2019; 24:169-181. [DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2019.1602736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Platts
- Imperial College Healthcare Trust, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Benjamin Jones
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Beliefs, attitudes and funding of assisted reproductive technology: Public perception of over 6,000 respondents from 6 European countries. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0211150. [PMID: 30682152 PMCID: PMC6347360 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Fertility rates in Europe are among the lowest in the world, which may be attributed to both biological and lifestyle factors. Cost and reimbursement of fertility treatments vary across Europe, although its citizens enjoy wide access to fertility care. Since few regional studies evaluating public support for fertility treatment exist, we conducted the Listening IVF and Fertility in Europe (LIFE) survey to ascertain public perception of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and gamete donation as a treatment for infertility among European men and women. Methods and findings This survey was distributed via an online questionnaire to 8,682 individuals who were voluntary participants in an online research panel residing in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, or the UK. The survey covered items to determine respondents’ beliefs regarding IVF and its success, the need for public funding, the use of IVF among modern families with different lifestyles, and the support for gamete donation. Results were analyzed by age, country of origin, sex, and sexual orientation. A total of 6,110 (70% of total) men and women responded. Among all respondents, 10% had undergone IVF treatment and 48% had considered or would consider IVF in case of infertility. Respondents estimated IVF mean success rate to be 47% and over half of respondents believed that availability of IVF would encourage people to delay conception. Although 93% of respondents believed that IVF treatment should be publicly funded to some extent, a majority believed that secondary infertility or use of fertility treatments allowing to delay parenthood should be financed privately. Survey respondents believed that the mean number of stimulated IVF cycles funded publicly should be limited 2 to 3 (average 2.4). 79% of respondents were willing to pay for IVF if needed with a mean amount of 5,400 € for a child brought to life through IVF. According to respondents, mean minimum and maximum ages for IVF should be 29 and 42 years old, respectively. The current survey showed support for egg and sperm donation (78%), for IVF in single women (61%) and for same-sex female couples (64%). When analyzing the results per group (i.e., sex, age, sexual orientation, and countries), youngest age groups, homosexuals, bisexuals, German respondents, and men had similar overall positive attitudes and beliefs toward IVF and opinions on public funding. Perceived limits to availability were stronger in women. Conclusion Overall, the survey results demonstrate a positive attitude among respondents in an online panel toward IVF, gamete donation, and support for public funding for fertility treatment. These findings could potentially drive discussions between patients and prescribers to explore IVF treatment and among legislators and payers to support public funding for these procedures.
Collapse
|