1
|
Jones BP, Vali S, Saso S, Devaney A, Bracewell-Milnes T, Nicopoullos J, Thum MY, Kaur B, Roufosse C, Stewart V, Bharwani N, Ogbemudia A, Barnardo M, Dimitrov P, Klucniks A, Katz R, Johannesson L, Diaz Garcia C, Udupa V, Friend P, Quiroga I, Smith JR. Living donor uterus transplant in the UK: A case report. BJOG 2024; 131:372-377. [PMID: 37607687 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Revised: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin P Jones
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Saaliha Vali
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Cutrale Perioperative and Ageing Group, Sir Michael Uren Hub, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Andrea Devaney
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
| | - James Nicopoullos
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
| | - Meen-Yau Thum
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
| | - Baljeet Kaur
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- North West London Pathology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Candice Roufosse
- North West London Pathology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department Immunology and Inflammation, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Victoria Stewart
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Nishat Bharwani
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ann Ogbemudia
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Martin Barnardo
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter Dimitrov
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Andris Klucniks
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Katz
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Cesar Diaz Garcia
- IVI London, IVIRMA Global, London, UK
- EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Venkatesha Udupa
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter Friend
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Isabel Quiroga
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - J Richard Smith
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jones BP, Vali S, Kasaven LS, Mantrali I, Saso S, Bracewell-Milnes T, Nicopoullos J, Thum MY, Diaz-Garcia C, Quiroga I, Yazbek J, Smith JR. INvestigational Study Into Transplantation of the Uterus (INSITU): a cross-sectional survey among women with uterine factor infertility in the UK assessing background, motivations and suitability. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073517. [PMID: 38070921 PMCID: PMC10728960 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The study summarises the selection prescreen criteria currently used in the UK for a uterus transplant and highlights the number of women who are suitable to proceed. OBJECTIVES To assess the demographics, motivations, reasons and suitability among women with absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI) to undergo uterine transplantation (UTx). DESIGN A cross-sectional survey. SETTING An electronic questionnaire was sent via email to women with AUFI who had previously been referred to the UTx research team or approached the Womb Transplant UK Charity. The questions assessed suitability to undergo UTx based on demographic information, perceptions to adoption and surrogacy and reasons why UTx was preferable. Responses were assessed against the study selection criteria. PARTICIPANTS Women with AUFI. RESULTS 210 women completed the questionnaire. The most common aetiology of AUFI in our cohort was Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (68%; n=143) whereas 29% (n=62) had previously undergone hysterectomy. 63% (n=132) of the cohort had previously considered adoption, 5% (n=11) had attempted it and 2 (1%) had successfully adopted. The most common reason cited to undergo UTx over adoption was to experience gestation (n=63; 53%), while 37% (n=44) wanted a biologically related child. 76% (n=160) of participants had previously considered surrogacy, 22 (10%) had attempted it and 2 (1%) had successfully become mothers using a surrogate. The most common reason to undergo UTx over surrogacy was to experience gestation (n=77; 54%). 15% (n=21) were concerned about the legal implications, 14% (n=20) identified the financial cost as a barrier and 8% (n=12) could not consider it due to religious reasons. On adhering to the selection criteria, 65 (31%) women were suitable to proceed with the trial. CONCLUSION The study demonstrates that implementing commonly used selection criteria for a UTx led to an attrition rate of more than two-thirds of women who requested to initially undergo the process. As more studies present outcomes following UTx, critical assessment of the selection criteria currently used is warranted to ensure potential recipients are not being unnecessarily excluded. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02388802.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin P Jones
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Saaliha Vali
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Lorraine S Kasaven
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Ifigenia Mantrali
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - James Nicopoullos
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Meen-Yau Thum
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Joseph Yazbek
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - James Richard Smith
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kasaven LS, Mitra A, Ostrysz P, Theodorou E, Murugesu S, Yazbek J, Bracewell-Milnes T, Ben Nagi J, Jones BP, Saso S. Exploring the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of women of reproductive age towards fertility and elective oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility decline in the UK: a cross-sectional survey. Hum Reprod 2023; 38:2478-2488. [PMID: 37816663 PMCID: PMC10694402 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What are the knowledge, perceptions and attitudes towards fertility and elective oocyte cryopreservation (OC) for age-related fertility decline (ARFD) in women in the UK? SUMMARY ANSWER Awareness of OC for ARFD has reportedly improved compared to studies carried out almost a decade ago, but inconsistencies in knowledge remain regarding the rate of miscarriage amongst specific age groups, the financial costs and optimal age to undergo OC for ARFD. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The age of first-time motherhood has increased amongst western societies, with many women of reproductive age underestimating the impact of age on fertility. Further understanding of women's awareness of their fertility, the options available to preserve it and the barriers for seeking treatment earlier are required in order to prevent the risk of involuntary childlessness. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A hyperlink to a cross-sectional survey was posted on social media (Instagram) between 25 February 2021 and 11 March 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Women from the general population aged 18-50 years were invited to complete the survey. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In total, 5482 women fulfilled the inclusion criteria and completed the survey. The mean age of participants was 35.0 years (SD 10.25; range 16-52). Three quarters (74.1%; n = 4055) disagreed or strongly disagreed they felt well informed regarding the options available to preserve their fertility, in case of a health-related problem or ARFD. The majority overestimated the risk of miscarriage in women aged ≥30 years old, with 14.5% correctly answering 20%, but underestimated the risks in women ≥40, as 20.1% correctly answered 40-50%. Three quarters (73.2%; n = 4007) reported an awareness of OC for ARFD and 65.8% (n = 3605) reported that they would consider undergoing the procedure. The number of women who considered OC for ARFD across age groups were as follows: 18-25 (8.3%; n = 300), 26-30 (35.8%; n = 1289), 31-35 (45.9%; n = 1654), 36-40 (9.6%; n = 347), 41-45 (0.3%; n = 13), and 46-50 (0.1%; n = 2). The majority of women (81.3%; n = 4443) underestimated the cost of a single cycle of OC for ARFD (<£5000). Furthermore, 10.4% (n = 566) believed a single cycle would be adequate enough to retrieve sufficient oocytes for cryopreservation. Approximately 11.0% (n = 599) believed OC for ARFD may pose significant health risks and affect future fertility. Less than half agreed or strongly agreed that the lack of awareness regarding OC for ARFD has impacted the likelihood of pursuing this method of fertility preservation further (41.4%; n = 2259). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Results from cross-sectional studies are limited as interpretations made are merely associations and not of causal relationships. The online nature of participant recruitment is subject to selection bias, considering women with access to social media are often from higher socioeconomic and education backgrounds, thus limiting generalizability of the findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Further education regarding the financial costs and optimal age to undergo elective OC to increase the chances of successful livebirth are required. Clinicians should encourage earlier fertility counselling to ensure that OC is deemed a preventative measure of ARFD, rather than an ultimate recourse to saving declining fertility. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No funding was required for this article. There are no conflicts of interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L S Kasaven
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Charlotte’s and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Cutrale Perioperative and Ageing Group, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - A Mitra
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Charlotte’s and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK
| | - P Ostrysz
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - E Theodorou
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK
| | - S Murugesu
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - J Yazbek
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Charlotte’s and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK
| | - T Bracewell-Milnes
- Department of Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
| | - J Ben Nagi
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK
| | - B P Jones
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Charlotte’s and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK
| | - S Saso
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Charlotte’s and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bayar E, Williams NJ, Alghrani A, Murugesu S, Saso S, Bracewell-Milnes T, Thum MY, Nicopoullos J, Sangster P, Yasmin E, Smith JR, Wilkinson S, Pacey A, Jones BP. Fertility preservation and realignment in transgender women. HUM FERTIL 2023; 26:463-482. [PMID: 36799335 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2022.2163195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
Medical care for transgender people is multi-faceted and attention to individual reproductive aspirations and planning are an essential, yet often overlooked aspect of care. Given the impact of hormonal therapy and other gender affirmation procedures on reproductive function, extensive counselling and consideration of fertility preservation is recommended prior to their commencement. This review article explores the reproductive aspirations of transgender women and considers the current disparity between stated desires regarding utilisation of fertility preservation services. Current fertility preservation options and prospective treatments currently showing promise in the research arena are explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erna Bayar
- Department of Gynaecology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Nicola J Williams
- Department of Politics, Philosophy and Religion, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Amel Alghrani
- School of Law and Social Justice, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sughashini Murugesu
- Department of Gynaecology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Department of Gynaecology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Meen-Yau Thum
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, Chelsea Bridge Road, London, UK
| | - James Nicopoullos
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, Chelsea Bridge Road, London, UK
| | - Philippa Sangster
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ephia Yasmin
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - J Richard Smith
- Department of Gynaecology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen Wilkinson
- Department of Politics, Philosophy and Religion, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Allan Pacey
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Benjamin P Jones
- Department of Gynaecology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bayar E, Saso S, Galazis N, Jones B, Bracewell-Milnes T, Chawla M, Ahmed-Salim Y, Nagi JB. Impact of polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on assisted reproductive technology outcomes: a systematic review. HUM FERTIL 2023; 26:678-686. [PMID: 34906024 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2021.2007421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
This review explores the impact of polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) supplementation in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) on reproductive outcomes. A systematic search of English peer-reviewed journals was carried out using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify articles published from January 1978 to 2021. The primary outcomes assessed included pregnancy and live birth rates. Secondary outcome measures included: (i) implantation rate; (ii) fertilisation rate; (iii) number of oocytes retrieved; (iv) number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes; (v) blastocyst conversion; and (vi) embryo quality. A total of 4 randomised control trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. There is a lack of high-quality research to support widespread dietary supplementation with PUFAs in women undergoing ART. Prior to its clinical recommendation, there is a need for well-designed RCTs to facilitate an in-depth understanding of PUFA supplementation in women undergoing ART.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erna Bayar
- Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, Queen Charlotte's Hospital, London, UK
- Institute for Reproductive Development and Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, Queen Charlotte's Hospital, London, UK
- Institute for Reproductive Development and Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Nicolas Galazis
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Northwick Park NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Benjamin Jones
- Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, Queen Charlotte's Hospital, London, UK
- Institute for Reproductive Development and Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Mehar Chawla
- Obstetrics & Gynaecology Department, North Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK
| | - Yousra Ahmed-Salim
- Institute for Reproductive Development and Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jara Ben Nagi
- The Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kasaven LS, Saso S, Getreu N, O'Neill H, Bracewell-Milnes T, Shakir F, Yazbek J, Thum MY, Nicopoullos J, Ben Nagi J, Hardiman P, Diaz-Garcia C, Jones BP. Age-related fertility decline: is there a role for elective ovarian tissue cryopreservation? Hum Reprod 2022; 37:1970-1979. [PMID: 35734904 PMCID: PMC9433842 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Age-related fertility decline (ARFD) is a prevalent concern amongst western cultures due to the increasing age of first-time motherhood. Elective oocyte and embryo cryopreservation remain the most established methods of fertility preservation, providing women the opportunity of reproductive autonomy to preserve their fertility and extend their childbearing years to prevent involuntary childlessness. Whilst ovarian cortex cryopreservation has been used to preserve reproductive potential in women for medical reasons, such as in pre- or peripubertal girls undergoing gonadotoxic chemotherapy, it has not yet been considered in the context of ARFD. As artificial reproductive technology (ART) and surgical methods of fertility preservation continue to evolve, it is a judicious time to review current evidence and consider alternative options for women wishing to delay their fertility. This article critically appraises elective oocyte cryopreservation as an option for women who use it to mitigate the risk of ARFD and introduces the prospect of elective ovarian cortex cryopreservation as an alternative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorraine S Kasaven
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Cutrale Perioperative and Ageing Group, Sir Michael Uren Hub, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Natalie Getreu
- Translational Ovarian Physiology and Pathophysiology, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Helen O'Neill
- Genome Editing and Reproductive Genetics Group, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Fevzi Shakir
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Joseph Yazbek
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Meen-Yau Thum
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Jara Ben Nagi
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK
| | | | - Cesar Diaz-Garcia
- IVI London, IVIRMA Global, London, UK.,EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Benjamin P Jones
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bracewell-Milnes T, Hossain A, Jones BP, Faris R, Parikh J, Nicopoullos J, Johnson M, Thum MY. Does egg-sharing negatively impact on the chance of the donor or recipient achieving a live birth? HUM FERTIL 2022:1-10. [PMID: 35332836 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2022.2053213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to discover whether egg sharing compromises the chance of donors or recipients achieving a live birth. A descriptive cohort study was performed of 4,545 fertility patients and 5,316 stimulation cycles at a London based fertility clinic between 2010 and 2019. There was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) or live birth rate (LBR) between egg sharers and standard IVF patients or between egg sharing recipients and non-egg sharing recipients. Both egg sharers and their recipients had fewer oocytes and fewer day 3 embryos available for fresh embryo transfer or cryopreservation than standard IVF patients or non-egg sharing recipients. The cumulative LBR were significantly lower amongst egg sharers than standard IVF patients (p < 0.05), and significantly lower amongst egg sharing recipients than non-egg sharing recipients (p < 0.05). This study demonstrates that egg sharing does not compromise the chances of donors or their recipients achieving a live birth. However, participants may occasionally require additional ovarian stimulation cycles to conceive. With government funding for IVF treatment falling, egg sharing provides a practical option to allow more women access to IVF. Egg sharing is currently the most efficient way of maximising the use of the precious resource of human oocytes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- Imperial College London, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, London, UK.,Assisted Conception Unit, The Lister Fertility Clinic, London, UK
| | - Aleena Hossain
- Imperial College London, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, London, UK
| | - Benjamin P Jones
- Imperial College London, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, London, UK
| | - Raef Faris
- Assisted Conception Unit, The Lister Fertility Clinic, London, UK
| | - Jaya Parikh
- Assisted Conception Unit, The Lister Fertility Clinic, London, UK
| | | | - Mark Johnson
- Imperial College London, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, London, UK
| | - Meen-Yau Thum
- Imperial College London, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, London, UK.,Assisted Conception Unit, The Lister Fertility Clinic, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bracewell-Milnes T, Holland JC, Jones BP, Saso S, Almeida P, Maclaran K, Norman-Taylor J, Nikolaou D, Shah NM, Johnson M, Thum MY. Exploring the knowledge and attitudes of women of reproductive age from the general public towards egg donation and egg sharing: a UK-based study. Hum Reprod 2021; 36:2189-2201. [PMID: 34227667 PMCID: PMC8648294 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What are the knowledge and views of UK-based women towards egg donation (ED) and egg sharing (ES)? SUMMARY ANSWER Lacking knowledge of the practices of ED and ES could be an influential factor in donor egg shortages, rather than negative perceptions or lack of donor anonymity and financial incentives. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The increasing age of women trying to conceive has led to donor egg shortages, with ED and ES failing to meet demand. Indeed, in recent years in the UK, ES numbers have fallen. This results in long waiting lists, forcing patients abroad for fertility treatment to take up cross border reproductive care. Previous research suggests a lack of knowledge of ED among members of the general public; however, no study has yet assessed knowledge or views of ES in the general public. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Six hundred and thirty-five UK-based women over 18 years were voluntarily recruited from social media community groups by convenience sampling. The recruitment period was from February to April 2020. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Participants completed a previously validated questionnaire regarding female fertility, ED and ES, including knowledge, perceptions and approval of the practices and relevant legislation. This included ranking key benefits and issues regarding egg sharing. The questionnaire was completed using the online Qualtrics survey software. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Regarding knowledge of ED and ES, 56.3% and 79.8%, respectively had little or no prior knowledge. Upon explanation, most approved of ED (85.8%) and ES (70.4%). A greater proportion of respondents would donate to a family member/friend (49.75%) than to an anonymous recipient (35.80%). Overall, ES was viewed less favourably than ED, with ethical and practical concerns highlighted. Women aged 18-30 years were significantly more likely to approve of egg donation practice compared to those aged >30 years (P < 0.0001). Those against ES found fears of financial coercion or negative psychological wellbeing the most concerning. About 35.8% and 49.7% would personally consider anonymous and known ED, respectively, whilst 56.7% would consider ES. Those answering in favour of egg sharing were significantly more likely to give higher benefit ratings compared to those against the practice (P < 0.001). Most agreed (55.8%) with and were not deterred to donate (60.1%) by the 'Disclosure of Donor Identity' legislation. Only 31.6% agreed with the compensatory cap; however, 52.7% would not be more motivated to donate by an increased cap. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION There were several limitations of the study, including the use of convenience sampling and the voluntary nature of participation opening the study up to sampling and participation bias. Finally, closed questions were predominantly used to allow the generation of quantitative data and statistical analysis. However, this approach prevented opinion justification and qualitative analysis, limiting the depth of conclusions drawn. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS To our knowledge, this is the first study to survey the general public's knowledge and views of ED/ES using a previously validated questionnaire. The conclusion that lack of knowledge could be contributing to the current donor shortfall in the UK demonstrates that campaigns to inform women of the practices are necessary to alleviate donor oocyte shortages. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funds were used for this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- Assisted Conception Unit, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.,Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - James C Holland
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Benjamin P Jones
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Paula Almeida
- Assisted Conception Unit, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Kate Maclaran
- Assisted Conception Unit, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | - Nishel M Shah
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Mark Johnson
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK.,The Lister Hospital, The Lister Fertility Clinic, London, UK
| | - Meen-Yau Thum
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK.,The Lister Hospital, The Lister Fertility Clinic, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Barcroft JF, Galazis N, Jones BP, Getreu N, Bracewell-Milnes T, Grewal KJ, Sorbi F, Yazbek J, Lathouras K, Smith JR, Hardiman P, Thum MY, Ben-Nagi J, Ghaem-Maghami S, Verbakel J, Saso S. Fertility Treatment and Cancers—The Eternal Conundrum: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2021. [DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000754400.96078.d7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
10
|
Barcroft JF, Galazis N, Jones BP, Getreu N, Bracewell-Milnes T, Grewal KJ, Sorbi F, Yazbek J, Lathouras K, Smith JR, Hardiman P, Thum MY, Ben-Nagi J, Ghaem-Maghami S, Verbakel J, Saso S. Fertility treatment and cancers-the eternal conundrum: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2021; 36:1093-1107. [PMID: 33586777 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Revised: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Does fertility treatment (FT) significantly increase the incidence of breast, ovarian, endometrial or cervical cancer? SUMMARY ANSWER Overall, FT does not significantly increase the incidence of breast, ovarian or endometrial cancer and may even reduce the incidence of cervical cancer. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Infertility affects more than 14% of couples. Infertility and nulliparity are established risk factors for endometrial, ovarian and breast cancer, yet the association with FT is more contentious. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A literature search was carried out using Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline and Google Scholar up to December 2019. Peer-reviewed studies stating cancer incidence (breast, ovarian, endometrial or cervical) in FT and no-FT groups were identified. Out of 128 studies identified, 29 retrospective studies fulfilled the criteria and were included (n = 21 070 337). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS In the final meta-analysis, 29 studies were included: breast (n = 19), ovarian (n = 19), endometrial (n = 15) and cervical (n = 13), 17 studies involved multiple cancer types and so were included in each individual cancer meta-analysis. Primary outcome of interest was cancer incidence (breast, ovarian, endometrial and cervical) in FT and no-FT groups. Secondary outcome was cancer incidence according to specific fertility drug exposure. Odds ratio (OR) and random effects model were used to demonstrate treatment effect and calculate pooled treatment effect, respectively. A meta-regression and eight sub-group analyses were performed to assess the impact of the following variables, maternal age, infertility, study size, outliers and specific FT sub-types, on cancer incidence. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Cervical cancer incidence was significantly lower in the FT group compared with the no-FT group: OR 0.68 (95% CI 0.46-0.99). The incidences of breast (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.73-1.01) and endometrial (OR 1.28; 95% CI 0.92-1.79) cancers were not found to be significantly different between the FT and no-FT groups. Whilst overall ovarian cancer incidence was not significantly different between the FT and no-FT groups (OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.98-1.46), separate analysis of borderline ovarian tumours (BOT) revealed a significant association (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.27-2.25). In further sub-group analyses, ovarian cancer incidence was shown to be significantly higher in the IVF (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.03-1.69) and clomiphene citrate (CC) treatment group (OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.10-1.77), respectively when compared with the no-FT group. Conversely, the incidences of breast (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61-0.92) and cervical cancer (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.38-0.89) were significantly lower in the IVF treatment sub-group compared to the no-FT group. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The large, varied dataset spanning a wide study period introduced significant clinical heterogeneity. Thus, results have to be interpreted with an element of caution. Exclusion of non-English citations, unpublished work and abstracts, in order to ensure data accuracy and reliability was maintained, may have introduced a degree of selection bias. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The results for breast, ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancer are reassuring, in line with previously published meta-analyses for individual cancers but the association between IVF and CC treatment and an increase in ovarian cancer incidence requires additional work to understand the potential mechanism driving this association. In particular, focusing on (i) discriminating specific treatments effects from an inherent risk of malignancy; (ii) differential risk profiles among specific patient sub-groups (refractory treatment and obesity); and (iii) understanding the impact of FT outcomes on cancer incidence. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study did not receive any funding. The authors have no financial, personal, intellectual and professional conflicts of interest to declare. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019153404.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Frances Barcroft
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Nicolas Galazis
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Benjamin P Jones
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Natalie Getreu
- Institute of Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Karen J Grewal
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Flavia Sorbi
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Joseph Yazbek
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Kostas Lathouras
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - J Richard Smith
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Paul Hardiman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Free and University College Medical School, NW3 2PF London, UK
| | - Meen-Yau Thum
- The Lister Fertility Clinic, Chelsea Bridge Road, London, UK
| | - Jara Ben-Nagi
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK
| | - Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Jan Verbakel
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hughes T, Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Jones BP, Almeida PA, Maclaren K, Norman-Taylor J, Johnson M, Nikolaou D. A review on the motivations, decision-making factors, attitudes and experiences of couples using pre-implantation genetic testing for inherited conditions. Hum Reprod Update 2021; 27:944-966. [PMID: 33969393 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmab013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Revised: 02/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT), fertile couples undergo IVF with genetic testing of embryos to avoid conceptions with a genetic condition. There is an exponentially increasing uptake with over 600 applications listed by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority in the UK. The psychological aspects of the decision-making process and the experience of PGT, however, are relatively underevaluated, with the potential to leave patients unsupported in their journeys. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE In this review, we aim to comprehensively report on every aspect of couples' experiences of PGT. We consider what motivates users, the practical and ethical decisions involved and how couples navigate the decision-making process. Additionally, we report on the social and psychological impact on couples who are actively undergoing or have completed the PGT process. SEARCH METHODS A systematic search of English peer-reviewed journals of three computerized databases was undertaken following PRISMA guidelines. Studies that examined the motivations, attitudes, decision-making factors and experiences of patients who have been actively engaged in the PGT process were included. No restrictions were placed on study design or date of publication. Studies examining patients using PGT in a hypothetical context or solely using PGT for aneuploidy were excluded. Qualitative data were extracted using thematic analysis. OUTCOMES The main outcomes were patient motivations, deciding factors and attitudes, as well as the patient experience of coming to a decision and going through PGT.Patients were primarily motivated by the desire to have a healthy child and to avoid termination of pregnancy. Those with a sick child or previous experience of termination were more likely to use PGT. Patients also felt compelled to make use of the technology available, either from a moral responsibility to do so or to avoid feelings of guilt if not. The main factors considered when deciding to use PGT were the need for IVF and the acceptability of the technology, the financial cost of the procedure and one's ethical standpoint on the creation and manipulation of embryos. There was a general consensus that PGT should be applied to lethal or severe childhood disease but less agreement on use for adult onset or variable expression conditions. There was an agreement that it should not be used to select for aesthetic traits and a frustration with the views of PGT in society. We report that couples find it difficult to consider all of the benefits and costs of PGT, resulting in ambivalence and prolonged indecision. After deciding on PGT use, we found that patients find the process extremely impractical and psychologically demanding. WIDER IMPLICATIONS This review aimed to summarize the current knowledge on how patients decide to use and experience PGT and to make suggestions to incorporate the findings into clinical practice. We cannot stress enough the importance of holistic evaluation of patients and thorough counselling prior to and during PGT use from a multidisciplinary team that includes geneticists, IVF clinicians, psychologists and also patient support groups. Large prospective studies using a validated psychological tool at various stages of the PGT process would provide an invaluable database for professionals to better aid patients in their decision-making and to improve the patient experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Hughes
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Benjamin P Jones
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Paula A Almeida
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Katherine Maclaren
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Julian Norman-Taylor
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Mark Johnson
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Nikolaou
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Murugesu S, Galazis N, Jones BP, Chan M, Bracewell-Milnes T, Ahmed-Salim Y, Grewal K, Timmerman D, Yazbek J, Bourne T, Saso S. Evaluating the use of telemedicine in gynaecological practice: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e039457. [PMID: 33293306 PMCID: PMC7722813 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this systematic review is to examine the use of telemedicine in the delivery and teaching of gynaecological clinical practice. To our knowledge, no other systematic review has assessed this broad topic. DESIGN Systematic review of all studies investigating the use of telemedicine in the provision of gynaecological care and education. The search for eligible studies followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and focused on three online databases: PubMed, Science Direct and SciFinder. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Only studies within gynaecology were considered for this review. Studies covering only obstetrics and with minimal information on gynaecology, or clinical medicine in general were excluded. All English language, peer-reviewed human studies were included. Relevant studies published up to the date of final submission of this review were considered with no restrictions to the publication year. DATA EXTRACTIONS AND SYNTHESIS Data extracted included author details, year of publication and country of the study, study aim, sample size, methodology, sample characteristics, outcome measures and a summary of findings. Data extraction and qualitative assessment were performed by the first author and crossed checked by the second author. Quality assessment for each study was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS A literature search carried out in August 2020 yielded 313 records published between 1992 and 2018. Following a rigorous selection process, only 39 studies were included for this review published between 2000 and 2018. Of these, 19 assessed gynaecological clinical practice, eight assessed gynaecological education, one both, and 11 investigated the feasibility of telemedicine within gynaecological practice. 19 studies were classified as good, 12 fair and eight poor using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Telecolposcopy and abortion care were two areas where telemedicine was found to be effective in potentially speeding up diagnosis as well as providing patients with a wide range of management options. Studies focusing on education demonstrated that telementoring could improve teaching in a range of scenarios such as live surgery and international teleconferencing. CONCLUSIONS The results of this review are promising and demonstrate that telemedicine has a role to play in improving clinical effectiveness and education within gynaecology. Its applications have been shown to be safe and effective in providing remote care and training. In the future, randomised controlled studies involving larger numbers of patients and operators with measurable outcomes are required in order to be able to draw reliable conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sughashini Murugesu
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hillingdon Hospital NHS Trust, Uxbridge, UK
- Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Nicolas Galazis
- Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, London, UK
| | - Benjamin P Jones
- Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Institute for Reproductive Development and Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Maxine Chan
- Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Institute for Reproductive Development and Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Yousra Ahmed-Salim
- Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Karen Grewal
- Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Institute for Reproductive Development and Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Dirk Timmerman
- Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joseph Yazbek
- Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Tom Bourne
- Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Institute for Reproductive Development and Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Institute for Reproductive Development and Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Platts S, Trigg B, Bracewell-Milnes T, Jones BP, Saso S, Parikh J, Nicopoullos J, Almeida P, Norman-Taylor J, Nikolaou D, Johnson M, Thum MY. Exploring women's attitudes, knowledge, and intentions to use oocyte freezing for non-medical reasons: A systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020; 100:383-393. [PMID: 33078391 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Women are postponing childbearing and preventing age-related fertility decline with oocyte freezing for non-medical reasons (OFNMR). The objective of this systematic evaluation was to gain an understanding of women's attitudes and knowledge of, and intentions to use OFNMR among users of OFNMR and the general public. MATERIAL AND METHODS A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PyschINFO databases was undertaken, for studies that examined the psychosocial attitudes among women toward OFNMR. The search was limited to English language and no time restriction was set for publications. Extracted data were analyzed using thematic analysis and the study was performed according to PRISMA guidelines with prospective PROSPERO registration (CRD4201912578). RESULTS Overall, 35 studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies were broadly categorized into studies investigating users or potential users of OFNMR, and studies examining the views of members of the general public. Users of OFNMR have good knowledge of age-related fertility decline and awareness of the OFNMR procedure. Lack of partner was identified as the most common motivating factor to undertake OFNMR, with cost as a predominant concern. Knowledge among the general public of OFNMR is highly variable. Underestimation of age-related fertility decline is common among the general public. Intentions of women to use OFNMR also varied drastically between studies. CONCLUSIONS Women are predominantly motivated to freeze eggs by the lack of a suitable partner, but cost is a significant barrier. Increasing the number of women pursuing OFNMR at an earlier stage may positively impact upon the risk of future involuntary childlessness. Better information should be made available to both women and men about their fertility and options to inform their reproductive decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Platts
- Women's Health Department, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | - Benjamin P Jones
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Paula Almeida
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, Assisted Conception Unit, London, UK
| | | | | | - Mark Johnson
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ahmed-Salim Y, Galazis N, Bracewell-Milnes T, Phelps DL, Jones BP, Chan M, Munoz-Gonzales MD, Matsuzono T, Smith JR, Yazbek J, Krell J, Ghaem-Maghami S, Saso S. The application of metabolomics in ovarian cancer management: a systematic review. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 31:754-774. [PMID: 33106272 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Metabolomics, the global analysis of metabolites in a biological specimen, could potentially provide a fast method of biomarker identification for ovarian cancer. This systematic review aims to examine findings from studies that apply metabolomics to the diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and recurrence of ovarian cancer. A systematic search of English language publications was conducted on PubMed, Science Direct, and SciFinder. It was augmented by a snowball strategy, whereby further relevant studies are identified from reference lists of included studies. Studies in humans with ovarian cancer which focus on metabolomics of biofluids and tumor tissue were included. No restriction was placed on the time of publication. A separate review of targeted metabolomic studies was conducted for completion. Qualitative data were summarized in a comprehensive table. The studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias using the ROBINS-I tool. 32 global studies were included in the main systematic review. Most studies applied metabolomics to diagnosing ovarian cancer, within which the most frequently reported metabolite changes were a down-regulation of phospholipids and amino acids: histidine, citrulline, alanine, and methionine. Dysregulated phospholipid metabolism was also reported in the separately reviewed 18 targeted studies. Generally, combinations of more than one significant metabolite as a panel, in different studies, achieved a higher sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis than a single metabolite; for example, combinations of different phospholipids. Widespread metabolite differences were observed in studies examining prognosis, treatment, and recurrence, and limited conclusions could be drawn. Cellular processes of proliferation and invasion may be reflected in metabolic changes present in poor prognosis and recurrence. For example, lower levels of lysine, with increased cell invasion as an underlying mechanism, or glutamine dependency of rapidly proliferating cancer cells. In conclusion, this review highlights potential metabolites and biochemical pathways which may aid the clinical care of ovarian cancer if further validated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicolas Galazis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | | | - David L Phelps
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Benjamin P Jones
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Maxine Chan
- South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London Department of Materials, London, UK
| | | | - Tomoko Matsuzono
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - James Richard Smith
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Joseph Yazbek
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Krell
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Imperial College London and NHS Trust, Du Cane Road, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Jones B, Cato S, Parikh R, Thum MY, Johnson M, Almeida P, Norman-Taylor J, Nikolaou D. A systematic review exploring the patient decision-making factors and attitudes towards pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and gender selection. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020; 100:17-29. [PMID: 32862440 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is in high demand worldwide, with ongoing debate among medical societies as to which patient groups it should be offered. The psychological aspects for patients regarding its use, lag behind the genomic technological advances, leaving couples with limited decision-making support. The development of this technology also leads to the possibility for its utilization in gender selection. Despite the controversy surrounding these issues, very few studies have investigated the psychological aspects of patients using PGT-A. MATERIAL AND METHODS This systematic review provides an up-to-date analysis of the psychosocial aspects surrounding PGT for aneuploidy and sex selection, as well as decision-making factors. A systematic search of English peer-reviewed journals of three computerized databases were undertaken following PRISMA guidelines. The qualitative data were extracted using thematic analysis. PROSPERO Registration number: CRD42019126439. RESULTS The main outcome measures were patients' motivations, decision-making factors, attitudes and experiences surrounding the use of PGT for aneuploidy and sex selection. Ten studies were included, four for PGT-A and six for sex selection. Attitudes towards PGT-A were positive, with the main motivating factors being decreasing miscarriage rate, reducing the risk of termination of pregnancy and reducing the time to pregnancy. Consistently raised concerns regarding PGT-A were the financial burden and moral beliefs. The vast majority of patients felt sufficiently knowledgeable to make the decision; however, studies did reveal that a minority mis-interpreted certain potential benefits of PGT-A. Studies investigating PGT for sex selection predominantly reported the main motivation was to achieve gender balance within the family dynamic, with most studies finding no difference between couples using PGT for gender selection to have male or female offspring. CONCLUSIONS Although this systematic review was limited by the small number of studies investigating this topic, a significant minority of patients appeared to misunderstand certain benefits and limitations of PGT-A. Fertility clinics must ensure they provide adequate counseling to all patients using PGT-A. With the use of PGT-A on the rise globally, there is a need to develop decision support tools for couples who have an increasing number of genetic testing options becoming available to them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Benjamin Jones
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | | | - Riya Parikh
- Biomedical Sciences, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Mark Johnson
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Paula Almeida
- Assisted Conception Unit, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Woon EV, Day A, Bracewell-Milnes T, Male V, Johnson M. Immunotherapy to improve pregnancy outcome in women with abnormal natural killer cell levels/activity and recurrent miscarriage or implantation failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Reprod Immunol 2020; 142:103189. [PMID: 32889304 DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2020.103189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
There is a trend towards offering immunotherapy to women with unexplained reproductive failure based on abnormal Natural Killer (NK) cell levels. Previous systematic reviews evaluating immunotherapy usage have not focused on women with abnormal level of NK cells. To address the gap in literature, this systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy to improve pregnancy outcome in women with recurrent miscarriage (RM) or implantation failure (RIF) specifically selected based on abnormal levels and/or activity of NK cells. Six databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies following PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using RoB2 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) and ROBINS-I for non-RCT. Of 1025 studies identified, seven studies on intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (four), prednisolone (one), etanercept (one) and intralipid (one) were included. Meta-analysis of the non-RCT IVIG studies (557 participants; 312 intervention, 245 controls) showed livebirth in favour of intervention (RR 2.57; 95 % CI = 1.79-3.69; p < 0.05), however there were significant heterogeneity (I2 = 62 %) and moderate to severe risk of bias in these studies. Individual RCTs reported improved livebirth outcome in etanercept, intralipid and prednisolone and this was significant in the former two (p < 0.05). In conclusion, there may be some benefit of immunotherapy, but paucity of high quality evidence means that it is not possible to support the use of immunotherapy even when selected based on abnormal NK cell level/activity. Further research with application of scientifically validated immunological biomarkers in well-planned large scale RCTs will determine whether immunotherapy is beneficial in this subpopulation of women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ee Von Woon
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, 369 Fulham Roadd, London, UK.
| | - Andrea Day
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, West Middlesex University Hospital, Twickenham Road, Isleworth, London UK
| | - Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, 369 Fulham Roadd, London, UK
| | - Victoria Male
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, 369 Fulham Roadd, London, UK
| | - Mark Johnson
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, 369 Fulham Roadd, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tharakan T, Dodia D, Attra T, Smith M, Vyas L, Maynard W, Bracewell-Milnes T, Thum M, Yap T, Jayasena C, Ramsay J, Minhas S. The impact of total motile sperm count on IVF/ICSI outcomes: Is total motile sperm count a better parameter than sperm morphology? EUR UROL SUPPL 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(20)33021-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
18
|
Al-Memar M, Vaulet T, Fourie H, Bobdiwala S, Farren J, Saso S, Bracewell-Milnes T, Moor BD, Sur S, Stalder C, Bennett P, Timmerman D, Bourne T. First-trimester intrauterine hematoma and pregnancy complications. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 55:536-545. [PMID: 31483898 DOI: 10.1002/uog.20861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2019] [Revised: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether sonographic diagnosis of intrauterine hematoma (IUH) in the first trimester of pregnancy is associated with first-trimester miscarriage and antenatal, delivery and neonatal complications. METHODS This was a prospective observational cohort study of women with an intrauterine singleton pregnancy between 5 and 14 weeks' gestation recruited at Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK, between March 2014 and March 2016. Participants underwent serial ultrasound examinations in the first trimester, and the presence, location, size and persistence of any IUH was evaluated. First-trimester miscarriage was defined as pregnancy loss before 14 weeks' gestation. Clinical symptoms, including pelvic pain and vaginal bleeding, were recorded at each visit using validated symptom scores. Antenatal, delivery and neonatal outcomes were obtained from hospital records. Logistic regression analysis and the chi-square test were used to assess the association between the presence and features of IUH and the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcome. Odds ratios (OR) were first adjusted for maternal age (aOR) and then further adjusted for the presence of vaginal bleeding or pelvic pain in the first trimester. RESULTS Of 1003 women recruited to the study, 946 were included in the final analysis and of these, 268 (28.3%) were diagnosed with an IUH in the first trimester. The presence of IUH was associated with the incidence of preterm birth (aOR, 1.94 (95% CI, 1.07-3.52)), but no other individual or overall antenatal, delivery or neonatal complications. No association was found between the presence of IUH in the first trimester and first-trimester miscarriage (aOR, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.44-1.50)). These findings were independent of the absolute size of the hematoma and the presence of vaginal bleeding or pelvic pain in the first trimester. When IUH was present in the first trimester, there was no association between its size, content or position in relation to the gestational sac and overall antenatal, delivery and neonatal complications. Diagnosis of a retroplacental IUH was associated with an increased risk of overall antenatal complications (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate that there is no association between the presence of IUH in the first trimester and first-trimester miscarriage. However, an association with preterm birth, independently of the presence of symptoms of pelvic pain and/or vaginal bleeding, is evident. Women diagnosed with IUH in the first trimester should be counseled about their increased risk of preterm birth and possibly be offered increased surveillance during the course of their pregnancy. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Al-Memar
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - T Vaulet
- ESAT-STADIUS, Stadius Centre for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, Leuven, Belgium
- imec, Leuven, Belgium
| | - H Fourie
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - S Bobdiwala
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - J Farren
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - S Saso
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - T Bracewell-Milnes
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - B De Moor
- ESAT-STADIUS, Stadius Centre for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, Leuven, Belgium
- imec, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Sur
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - C Stalder
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - P Bennett
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - D Timmerman
- KU Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Bourne
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jones BP, Al-Chami A, Gonzalez X, Arshad F, Green J, Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Smith R, Serhal P, Ben Nagi J. Is oocyte maturity influenced by ovulation trigger type in oocyte donation cycles? HUM FERTIL 2019; 24:360-366. [PMID: 31571498 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2019.1671614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare clinical and laboratory outcomes between GnRHa, dual and HCG triggers in altruistic oocyte donation cycles. Normal or high responders were given either gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) or a dual trigger of GnRHa and a low dose of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG). Low responders were given HCG trigger. In 333 cycles, 232 (69.7%) received GnRHa trigger, 59 (17.7%) received dual trigger and 42 (12.6%) had HCG trigger. The total number of mature oocytes retrieved and cryopreserved were significantly higher in the GnRHa and dual trigger groups, compared to the HCG group (p < 0.001). However, the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate was significantly higher in the dual trigger group (n = 5 (8.5%)), compared to the GnRH agonist (n = 1 (0.4%)) and HCG groups (n = 0 (0%)) (p = 0.001). GnRHa trigger maximises mature oocyte yields in oocyte donors suspected of normal and high response but offers a significant reduction in OHSS risk compared to dual trigger. As such, dual trigger should not be used in oocyte donation. HCG trigger can also be used with a very low risk of OHSS at low risk of OHSS in carefully selected donors where GnRHa is unlikely to be effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin P Jones
- Department of Gynaecology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust , London , UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London , London , UK
| | - Ali Al-Chami
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health , London , UK
| | | | - Falak Arshad
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health , London , UK
| | - Joy Green
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health , London , UK
| | | | - Srdjan Saso
- Department of Gynaecology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust , London , UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London , London , UK
| | - Richard Smith
- Department of Gynaecology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust , London , UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London , London , UK
| | - Paul Serhal
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health , London , UK
| | - Jara Ben Nagi
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health , London , UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jones BP, Saso S, Bracewell-Milnes T, Thum MY, Nicopoullos J, Diaz-Garcia C, Friend P, Ghaem-Maghami S, Testa G, Johannesson L, Quiroga I, Yazbek J, Smith JR. Human uterine transplantation: a review of outcomes from the first 45 cases. BJOG 2019; 126:1310-1319. [PMID: 31410987 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Uterine transplantation restores reproductive anatomy in women with absolute uterine factor infertility and allows the opportunity to conceive, experience gestation, and acquire motherhood. The number of cases being performed is increasing exponentially, with detailed outcomes from 45 cases, including nine live births, now available. In light of the data presented herein, including detailed surgical, immunosuppressive and obstetric outcomes, the feasibility of uterine transplantation is now difficult to refute. However, it is associated with significant risk with more than one-quarter of grafts removed because of complications, and one in ten donors suffering complications requiring surgical repair. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Uterine transplantation is feasible in women with uterine factor infertility, but is associated with significant risk of complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B P Jones
- Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust London, London, UK.,Imperial College London, London, UK.,Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
| | - S Saso
- Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust London, London, UK.,Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - T Bracewell-Milnes
- Imperial College London, London, UK.,Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
| | - M-Y Thum
- Imperial College London, London, UK.,Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
| | - J Nicopoullos
- Imperial College London, London, UK.,Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
| | - C Diaz-Garcia
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,IVI London, IVIRMA Global, London, UK
| | - P Friend
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.,Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S Ghaem-Maghami
- Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust London, London, UK.,Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - G Testa
- Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - I Quiroga
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - J Yazbek
- Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust London, London, UK.,Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - J R Smith
- Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust London, London, UK.,Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jones BP, Saso S, L'Heveder A, Bracewell-Milnes T, Thum MY, Diaz-Garcia C, MacIntyre DA, Quiroga I, Ghaem-Maghami S, Testa G, Johannesson L, Bennett PR, Yazbek J, Smith JR. The vaginal microbiome in uterine transplantation. BJOG 2019; 127:230-238. [PMID: 31397072 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Women with congenital absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI) often need vaginal restoration to optimise sexual function. Given their lack of procreative ability, little consideration has previously been given to the resultant vaginal microbiome (VM). Uterine transplantation (UTx) now offers the opportunity to restore these women's reproductive potential. The structure of the VM is associated with clinical and reproductive implications that are intricately intertwined with the process of UTx. Consideration of how vaginal restoration methods impact VM is now warranted and assessment of the VM in future UTx procedures is essential to understand the interrelation of the VM and clinical and reproductive outcomes. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: The vaginal microbiome has numerous implications for clinical and reproductive outcomes in the context of uterine transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B P Jones
- Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
| | - S Saso
- Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - A L'Heveder
- Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - T Bracewell-Milnes
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
| | - M-Y Thum
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
| | - C Diaz-Garcia
- IVI London, IVIRMA Global, London, UK.,Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - D A MacIntyre
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,March of Dimes European Preterm Birth Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - I Quiroga
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - S Ghaem-Maghami
- Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - G Testa
- Baylor University Medical Centre, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - P R Bennett
- Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,March of Dimes European Preterm Birth Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - J Yazbek
- Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - J R Smith
- Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bracewell-Milnes T, Marcus S, MacDonald R. An unusual cause of post-partum pyrexia. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2019; 39:1017-1018. [PMID: 31023111 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1586857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus , London , UK
| | - Samuel Marcus
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Greenwich and Lewisham NHS Trust , London , UK
| | - Russell MacDonald
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Greenwich and Lewisham NHS Trust , London , UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Platts S, Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Jones B, Parikh R, Thum MY. Investigating attitudes towards oocyte donation amongst potential donors and the general population: a systematic review. HUM FERTIL 2019; 24:169-181. [DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2019.1602736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Platts
- Imperial College Healthcare Trust, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Benjamin Jones
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
P Jones B, Saso S, Bracewell-Milnes T, Barcroft J, Borley J, Goroszeniuk T, Lathouras K, Yazbek J, Richard Smith J. Laparoscopic uterosacral nerve block: A fertility preserving option in chronic pelvic pain. AIMS Medical Science 2019. [DOI: 10.3934/medsci.2019.4.260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
25
|
Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Nikolaou D, Norman-Taylor J, Johnson M, Thum MY. Investigating the effect of an abnormal cervico-vaginal and endometrial microbiome on assisted reproductive technologies: A systematic review. Am J Reprod Immunol 2018; 80:e13037. [DOI: 10.1111/aji.13037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- Division of Surgery and Cancer; Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology; Imperial College London; London UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Division of Surgery and Cancer; Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology; Imperial College London; London UK
| | - Dimitrios Nikolaou
- Assisted Conception Unit; Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus; London UK
| | | | - Mark Johnson
- Division of Surgery and Cancer; Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology; Imperial College London; London UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bracewell-Milnes T, Norman-Taylor J, Nikolaou D. Social egg freezing should be offered to single women approaching their late thirties: AGAINST: Women should be freezing their eggs earlier. BJOG 2018; 125:1580. [PMID: 30070067 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
27
|
Murugesu S, Saso S, Jones BP, Bracewell-Milnes T, Athanasiou T, Mania A, Serhal P, Ben-Nagi J. Does the use of calcium ionophore during artificial oocyte activation demonstrate an effect on pregnancy rate? A meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2017; 108:468-482.e3. [PMID: 28865547 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2017] [Revised: 06/23/2017] [Accepted: 06/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the effect, if any, of calcium ionophore as a method of artificial oocyte activation (AOA) on pregnancy outcomes and fertilization rates. DESIGN Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, prospective observational and retrospective trials, case reports, and a case-control trial. SETTING University-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENT(S) Infertile couples undergoing fertilization treatment. INTERVENTION(S) Use of calcium ionophore during AOA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Odds ratio (OR) as the summary statistic for binary variables was used. Both a fixed and random effects model were applied. Subgroup analysis using quantitative methodology (risk of bias, metaregression) and graphical comparison (funnel plot) assessed statistical heterogeneity. RESULT(S) Fourteen studies were selected. AOA with calcium ionophore increased the overall clinical pregnancy rate (per ET; OR = 3.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-7.37) and the live birth rate (OR = 3.33; 95% CI, 1.50-7.39). This effect of adding calcium ionophore was further demonstrated with fertilization, cleavage, blastocyst, and implantation rates. Subgroup analysis further supported our findings (studies where n > 10 in both arms; random and fixed effects models). A metaregression (beta = -.145) found that as the quality of the study increases, the effect of calcium ionophore is significantly more pronounced with regards to overall pregnancy rate. CONCLUSION(S) AOA with calcium ionophore treatment after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) results in a statistically significant improvement in fertilization, cleavage, blastulation, and implantation rates, as well as overall pregnancy and live-birth rates. The conclusion of this systematic review, demonstrating a strong effect of calcium ionophore use, is reassuring and promising, particularly for couples for whom ICSI alone yields poor fertilization rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sughashini Murugesu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hillingdon Hospital, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Benjamin P Jones
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thanos Athanasiou
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anastasia Mania
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Serhal
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jara Ben-Nagi
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Abdalla H, Nikolau D, Norman-Taylor J, Johnson M, Holmes E, Thum MY. Metabolomics as a tool to identify biomarkers to predict and improve outcomes in reproductive medicine: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2017; 23:723-736. [DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmx023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2016] [Accepted: 07/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
|
29
|
Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Abdalla H, Thum MY. A systematic review investigating psychosocial aspects of egg sharing in the United Kingdom and their potential effects on egg donation numbers. HUM FERTIL 2017; 21:163-173. [PMID: 28549399 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2017.1329554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
This review aims to provide an up-to-date knowledge of the psychosocial aspects of egg donation from the perspectives of the egg share donor and their recipient. It explores the motives, experiences and attitudes of egg sharers and their views towards donor anonymity and disclosure. Conclusions are made on how these findings can guide clinical practice and improve egg sharing numbers. A systematic search of peer-reviewed journals of four computerized databases was undertaken. Eleven studies were included in the review. Psychosocial aspects towards donation were positive from the egg share donor and recipient. Concerns raised were whether participating in the egg sharing scheme would impact on their success rates, as well as frustration expressed by a minority regarding the lack of knowledge of egg sharing outside of fertility clinics. The 2005 legislative changes in the UK have not caused the anticipated dramatic decrease in egg donation; however, oocyte donation still falls short of demand. Egg sharing provides a practical option for more patients to access IVF, whilst also providing more donor oocytes. Improved information provision will result in greater awareness of egg sharing, with the potential to recruit more donors and meet the needs of recipients currently on long waiting lists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- a Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology , Imperial College London , London , UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- a Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology , Imperial College London , London , UK
| | - Hossam Abdalla
- b Fertility Specialist , The Lister Hospital , London , UK
| | - Meen-Yau Thum
- b Fertility Specialist , The Lister Hospital , London , UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Saso S, Clarke A, Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso A, Al-Memar M, Thum MY, Yazbek J, Del Priore G, Hardiman P, Ghaem-Maghami S, Smith JR. Psychological Issues Associated With Absolute Uterine Factor Infertility and Attitudes of Patients Toward Uterine Transplantation. Prog Transplant 2016; 26:28-39. [PMID: 27136247 DOI: 10.1177/1526924816634840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Uterine transplantation (UTx). OBJECTIVE To explore patients' knowledge of and attitudes toward UTx before and after a short educational intervention via a video and question and answer (Q&A) session. DESIGN Large, in-depth survey investigating patients' motivations, aims, and beliefs on UTx. SETTING Imperial College London. PARTICIPANTS Women diagnosed with absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI) who were seeking information on UTx and had already volunteered to participate in the study. INTERVENTION A semistructured interview involving a brief baseline questionnaire before a Q&A session and a 20-minute video exploring the main risks and benefits for UTx. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Attitudes of self-referred patients with AUFI toward UTx before and after education focusing on UTx. Rank order of importance of key UTx-related issues. RESULTS Forty women were interviewed. Following the video presentation and Q&A session, 97.5% (n = 39) would undergo UTx ahead of surrogacy and adoption in full knowledge that the latter 2 options would be ultimately safer for their own well-being and the fact that the graft could fail even prior to conception. All felt that UTx should take place, and 92.5% saw UTx as achievable. CONCLUSION The study demonstrates a keen interest in UTx, partly because other options seem difficult to access. It is worth noting that people appear to be distancing themselves from the risk. This requires careful assessment in any clinical program. This study is the first to demonstrate a qualitative relationship between patients with AUFI and their curiosity and desire for UTx. It paves the way for forming the introduction into the psychological assessment of a potential patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srdjan Saso
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alex Clarke
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free London, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Anja Saso
- St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maya Al-Memar
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Meen-Yau Thum
- The Lister Hospital, Chelsea, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph Yazbek
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Paul Hardiman
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom Royal Free, University College and Whittington NHS Trusts, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, United Kingdom
| | - J Richard Smith
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Bora S, Ismail AM, Al-Memar M, Hamed AH, Abdalla H, Thum MY. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2016; 22:450-65. [DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmw006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2015] [Accepted: 02/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
32
|
Saso S, Clarke A, Bracewell-Milnes T, Al-Memar M, Hamed AH, Thum MY, Ghaem-Maghami S, Del Priore G, Smith JR. Survey of Perceptions of Health Care Professionals in the United Kingdom toward Uterine Transplant. Prog Transplant 2015; 25:56-63. [DOI: 10.7182/pit2015552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Context Currently, the only 2 options that women with absolute uterine factor infertility have for managing their infertility are surragocy or adoption. These women may also benefit from a possible future third option: uterine transplant Objective To investigate the opinions and views of UK health care professionals toward uterine transplant and rank issues related to uterine transplant by importance in order to make uterine transplant transparent and understandable to colleagues. Design Large, in-depth survey investigating health care professionals' opinions on uterine transplant. Setting Analysis done at Imperial College London. Participants UK transplant professionals (surgeons, nurses, operating room staff, and donor coordinators) and obstetricians and gynecologists (trainees, members, and fellows of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists). Intervention Questionnaires were given out at hospital grand rounds, trainee teaching days, and conferences (national and international). Main Outcome Measures Should uterine transplant take place? Is uterine transplant achievable? What is the rank order of importance of key issues related to uterine transplant? Results The study had 528 participants. With respect to overall support for uterine transplant and as a possible future therapeutic option for absolute uterine factor infertility, 93.8% (n=495) thought that uterine transplant should take place if considered appropriate medically, surgically, and ethically and 57.2% (n= 302) thought it was an achievable objective. Issues related to immunology of uterine transplant and pregnancy after uterine transplant were unanimously thought of as most important. More effort is required to educate health care professionals about all aspects of uterine transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srdjan Saso
- Imperial College London (SS, MAM, SG-M, JRS), Royal Free London, NHS Foundation Trust, London (AC), William Harvey Hospital, Ashford (TB-M), United Kingdom, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt (AHH), The Lister Hospital, Chelsea, London, United Kingdom (M-YT), Southeastern Regional Medical Center, Georgia (GDP)
| | - Alex Clarke
- Imperial College London (SS, MAM, SG-M, JRS), Royal Free London, NHS Foundation Trust, London (AC), William Harvey Hospital, Ashford (TB-M), United Kingdom, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt (AHH), The Lister Hospital, Chelsea, London, United Kingdom (M-YT), Southeastern Regional Medical Center, Georgia (GDP)
| | - Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- Imperial College London (SS, MAM, SG-M, JRS), Royal Free London, NHS Foundation Trust, London (AC), William Harvey Hospital, Ashford (TB-M), United Kingdom, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt (AHH), The Lister Hospital, Chelsea, London, United Kingdom (M-YT), Southeastern Regional Medical Center, Georgia (GDP)
| | - Maya Al-Memar
- Imperial College London (SS, MAM, SG-M, JRS), Royal Free London, NHS Foundation Trust, London (AC), William Harvey Hospital, Ashford (TB-M), United Kingdom, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt (AHH), The Lister Hospital, Chelsea, London, United Kingdom (M-YT), Southeastern Regional Medical Center, Georgia (GDP)
| | - Ali Hassan Hamed
- Imperial College London (SS, MAM, SG-M, JRS), Royal Free London, NHS Foundation Trust, London (AC), William Harvey Hospital, Ashford (TB-M), United Kingdom, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt (AHH), The Lister Hospital, Chelsea, London, United Kingdom (M-YT), Southeastern Regional Medical Center, Georgia (GDP)
| | - Meen-Yau Thum
- Imperial College London (SS, MAM, SG-M, JRS), Royal Free London, NHS Foundation Trust, London (AC), William Harvey Hospital, Ashford (TB-M), United Kingdom, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt (AHH), The Lister Hospital, Chelsea, London, United Kingdom (M-YT), Southeastern Regional Medical Center, Georgia (GDP)
| | - Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami
- Imperial College London (SS, MAM, SG-M, JRS), Royal Free London, NHS Foundation Trust, London (AC), William Harvey Hospital, Ashford (TB-M), United Kingdom, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt (AHH), The Lister Hospital, Chelsea, London, United Kingdom (M-YT), Southeastern Regional Medical Center, Georgia (GDP)
| | - Giuseppe Del Priore
- Imperial College London (SS, MAM, SG-M, JRS), Royal Free London, NHS Foundation Trust, London (AC), William Harvey Hospital, Ashford (TB-M), United Kingdom, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt (AHH), The Lister Hospital, Chelsea, London, United Kingdom (M-YT), Southeastern Regional Medical Center, Georgia (GDP)
| | - J. Richard Smith
- Imperial College London (SS, MAM, SG-M, JRS), Royal Free London, NHS Foundation Trust, London (AC), William Harvey Hospital, Ashford (TB-M), United Kingdom, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt (AHH), The Lister Hospital, Chelsea, London, United Kingdom (M-YT), Southeastern Regional Medical Center, Georgia (GDP)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Saso S, Bracewell-Milnes T, Ismail L, Hamed AH, Thum MY, Ghaem-Maghami S, Del Priore G, Smith JR. Psychological assessment tool for patients diagnosed with absolute uterine factor infertility and planning to undergo uterine transplantation. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2014; 34:504-7. [DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2014.914899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|