Conventional in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in sibling oocytes from couples with tubal infertility and normozoospermic semen

Secretomes from Conventional Insemination and Intra-Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection Derived Embryos Differentially Modulate Endometrial Cells In Vitro

Conventional Insemination (CI) and Intra-Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) are routinely used insemination methods in clinical Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) settings. However, the existing data on the developmental competence and implantation potential of CI and ICSI derived embryos are not unequivocal. This prospective study on 23 patients undergoing ART treatment explored whether the secretomes of CI- and ICSI-derived embryo differentially alter the expression of integrins (αv and β3 integrin) and MUCIN-1 (MUC-1) in a human endometrial epithelial cell line (Ishikawa). Immunocytochemical data demonstrated that the secretome of CI-derived top quality (GI) embryos induced higher (p < 0.05) expression of ɑv β3 compared to sibling ICSI derived G1 embryos in Ishikawa cells. Though, relative levels of the transcript for MUC-1, anti-adhesion molecule did not show a significant difference between the study groups, immunocytochemical analysis demonstrated significantly (p < 0.0001) higher expression of MUC-1 in cells treated with ICSI-derived embryo secretome, compared to that treated with CI -derived embryo secretome. These results suggest that secretomes from CI and ICSI embryos differentially modulate the endometrial cells in vitro. This hints at differences in the ability of CI- and ICSI- derived embryos to alter endometrial profile.

A brief history of technical developments in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Dedicated to the memory of J.M. Cummins

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is an assisted reproductive technology for treatment of severe male infertility introduced into clinical practice in 1992. This review provides a brief history of the development of ICSI by acknowledging major developments in the field. The review addresses key developments in pre-clinical and early studies, how ICSI compares with in vitro fertilisation, long-term consequences, how the mechanistic approach to ICSI has changed in both manual and semi-automated approaches, and how sperm selection procedures are integrated into ICSI. From the beginnings using animal models in the 1960-1970s, the development of ICSI is a remarkable and transformative success story. Indeed, its broad use (70% of cycles globally) exceeds the need required for treating infertile males, and this remains a controversial issue. There remain questions around the long-term health impacts of ICSI. Furthermore, advances in automation of the ICSI procedure are occurring. An estimated 6million children have been born from the ICSI procedure. With further automation of sperm selection technologies, coupled with automation of the injection procedure, it is likely that the proportion of children born from ICSI will further increase.

Efficacy of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in women with non-male factor infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has dramatically increased in patients with non-male factor infertility during the last decades. However, whether ICSI provides a significant benefit over in vitro fertilization (IVF) in these patients is still controversial. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of ICSI on reproductive outcomes with non-male factor infertility and to provide updated evidence for clinical practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to March 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy between ICSI and IVF in patients with non-male factor infertility were included. The main outcomes were the live birth rate (LBR), fertilization rate (FR), and total fertilization failure (TFF). The pooled estimates were calculated using the random-effects models as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023427004).

RESULTS

We included 18 RCTs with 3249 cycles and 30 994 oocytes. The results demonstrated that ICSI reduced the risk of TFF (RR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.13-0.50, I2  = 58%) and increased FR per oocyte inseminated/injected (RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.08-1.20, I2  = 69%), but it did not improve LBR (RR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.94-1.30, I2  = 0%) or other outcomes compared with IVF. However, the difference in fertilization failure reduction between ICSI and IVF may be explained by different randomization methods (randomization based on patients vs. sibling oocytes). When considering only studies with randomization based on patients, we found no evidence of the difference between the groups (RR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.48-1.06, I2  = 0%). Furthermore, no differences were observed in subgroup analyses based on other factors, including female age, study period, and controlled ovarian stimulation protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that ICSI leads to no difference in reproductive outcomes compared to IVF in patients with non-male factor infertility. Considering the cost and safety of ICSI, we have no evidence to support the routine use of ICSI in these populations. High-quality RCTs with large sample sizes will be needed to confirm our results and explore clinical and neonatal outcomes.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in poor responders with only single oocyte retrieved

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcomes between conventional insemination (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in poor responders with only a single oocyte retrieved.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective case-control study. Couples who were treated with assisted reproductive technology (ART) with a single oocyte retrieved in Mackay Memorial Hospital from 1996 to 2016 were recruited. All data were categorized into three groups, according to their fertilization method and semen quality: group A, conventional insemination with non-male factor (IVF-NMF, n = 115), group B, ICSI with male factor (ICSI-MF, n = 30), and group C, ICSI with non-male factor (ICSI-NMF, n = 49).

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was observed between IVF and ICSI groups in pregnancy outcomes, including the chemical or clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate. Similar fertilization rates per oocyte obtained were observed in IVF and ICSI patients, but significantly lower per mature oocyte in the ICSI group (IVF: 91.5%, ICSI-MF: 75.0%, ICSI-NMF: 77.8%). Although there is no statistical significance, the lower live birth rate is observed in group C than others (A:11.5%, B:25%, C:5%, p = 0.187).

CONCLUSION

In this study, pregnancy outcomes of conventional in vitro fertilization and ICSI in poor responders with only a single oocyte retrieved were similar. However, the fertilization rate of matured oocytes in ICSI groups is significantly lower than that in the IVF group, indicating that ICSI procedures might cause oocyte damage. Therefore, the choice of fertilization method should be based on semen quality. A randomized controlled trial should be performed to confirm our findings.

Marginal differences in preimplantation morphokinetics between conventional IVF and ICSI in patients with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): A sibling oocyte study

Objective

This study aimed to analyze the morphokinetic behaviour between conventional IVF and ICSI, in cycles with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A).

Materials

A randomized controlled trial (NCT03708991) was conducted in a private fertility center. Thirty couples with non-male factor infertility were recruited between November 2018 and April 2019. A total of 568 sibling cumulus oocyte complexes were randomly inseminated with conventional IVF and ICSI and cultured in an Embryoscope time-lapse system. The morphokinetic behaviour of IVF/ICSI sibling oocytes was analysed as primary endpoint. As secondary endpoints, morphokinetic parameters that predict blastocysts that will be biopsied, the day of biopsy, gender and euploid outcome was assessed.

Results

When comparing IVF to ICSI, only the time to reach the 2-cell stage (t2) was significantly delayed for IVF embryos: OR: 1.282 [1.020–1.612], p = 0.033. After standardizing for tPNf (ct parameters), only Blast(tStartBlastulation-t2) remained significant: OR: 0.803 [0.648–0.994], p = 0.044. For the analysis of zygotes that will be biopsied on day 5/6 versus zygotes without biopsy, only early morphokinetic parameters were considered. All parameters were different in the multivariate model: ct2: OR: 0.840 [0.709–0.996], p = 0.045; ct6: OR: 0.943 [0.890–0.998], p = 0.043; cc2(t3-t2): OR: 1.148 [1.044–1.263], p = 0.004; cc3(t5-t3): OR: 1.177 [1.107–1.251], p<0.0001. When comparing the development between blastocysts biopsied on day 5 versus day 6, only three morphokinetic parameters were significant: cc2(t3-t2): OR: 1.394 [1.010–1.926], p = 0.044; ctBlastocyst: OR: 0.613 [0.489–0.768], p<0.0001 and ctExpandedBlastocyst: OR: 0.913 [0.868–0.960], p = 0.0004. Multivariate analysis of gender and ploidy did not reveal differences in morphokinetic behaviour.

Conclusion

Minor morphokinetic differences are observed between IVF and ICSI. Early in the development, distinct cleavage patterns are observed between embryos that will be biopsied or not.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not superior to conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A)

STUDY QUESTION

Does the insemination method impact the euploidy outcome in couples with non-male factor infertility?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Conventional IVF can be applied in cycles with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A), as both IVF and ICSI generate equal numbers of euploid blastocysts.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Ever since its introduction, the popularity of ICSI has increased tremendously, even in couples with non-male factor infertility. The use of conventional IVF is a contraindication for couples undergoing PGT to ensure monospermic fertilisation and to eliminate potential paternal contamination from extraneous sperm attached to the zona pellucida. Despite this, it has recently been shown that sperm DNA fails to amplify under the conditions used for trophectoderm biopsy samples.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This single-centre prospective pilot study included 30 couples between November 2018 and April 2019.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHOD

Arab couples, with a female age between 18-40 years, body mass index ≤30 kg/m2, at least 10 cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs) following oocyte retrieval (OR) and normal semen concentration and motility (WHO) in the fresh ejaculate on the day of OR, were eligible for the study. Half of the sibling oocytes were assigned to conventional IVF, and the other half were assigned to ICSI. All embryos were cultured in a time-lapse imaging system in Global Total LP media. Blastocysts were subjected to trophectoderm biopsy on Day 5, 6 or 7 and next-generation sequencing (NGS) to determine blastocyst ploidy status. The primary objective was to determine the euploid rate in blastocysts from sibling oocytes.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A total of 568 COCs were randomly allocated between IVF (n = 283; 9.4 ± 4.0) and ICSI (n = 285; 9.5 ± 4.1). While the incidence of normal fertilisation per cycle (6.1 ± 3.8 (64.0%) vs 6.3 ± 3.5 (65.4%); P = 0.609) was distributed equally between IVF and ICSI, the degeneration rate (0.1 ± 0.3 vs 0.7 ± 0.8; P = 0.0003) was significantly higher after ICSI and the incidence of abnormal fertilisation (≥3 pronuclei) was significantly higher after IVF (0.9 ± 1.2 vs 0.2 ± 0.4; P = 0.005). For all fertilised oocytes, there were no differences in the number of good-quality embryos on Day 3 (74% vs 78%; P = 0.467), nor in the blastulation rate on Day 5 (80.4% vs 70.8%; P = 0.076). The total number of blastocysts biopsied per cycle on Days 5, 6 and 7 was not significantly different between IVF or ICSI (4.0 ± 2.8 vs 3.9 ± 2.5; P = 0.774). With euploid rates of 49.8 and 44.1% (P = 0.755; OR: 1.05664 [0.75188-1.48494), respectively, there was no significant difference identified between IVF and ICSI (2.0 ± 1.8 vs 1.9 ± 1.7; P = 0.808) and all couples had at least one euploid blastocyst available for transfer. When considering only euploid blastocysts, the male/female ratio was 61/39 in IVF and 43/57 in ICSI (P = 0.063).

LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION

This is a pilot study with a limited patient population of 30 couples (and 568 COCs) with a normal ovarian response. The results of our study should not be extrapolated to other patient populations.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

It is safe to apply conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility undergoing PGT-A.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No funding was obtained. There are no competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03708991.

ALWAYS ICSI? A SWOT analysis

PURPOSE

Intracytroplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) is a common procedure used to improve reproductive results, even among couples without male factor infertility. However, the evidence available is still uncertain on the possible advantages and deficiencies that this procedure may have in patients with no formal indication for ICSI.

METHODS

A SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis examines the possible advantages and deficiencies of performing ICSI in these patients with no formal indication.

RESULTS

The evidence suggests that ICSI is not justified for non-male factor infertile couples requiring in vitro conception. One of the major strengths associated to the procedure is the virtual elimination of cases further complicated by total fertilization failure and a combination between IVF and ICSI on sibling oocytes has been advised in the literature. Greater technical difficulties, higher costs and performing an unnecessary invasive technique in some cases represent some of the weaknesses of the procedure, and questions regarding safety issues should not be ruled out.

CONCLUSION

Despite the widespread use of ICSI in patients without a formal diagnosis of male factor infertility, evidence demonstrating its effectiveness in this population is still lacking. Additional large and well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify definitive indications for ICSI in non-male factor infertility.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor indications: a committee opinion

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, while typically effective for overcoming low or absent fertilization in couples with a clear abnormality of semen parameters, is frequently used in combination with assisted reproductive technologies for other etiologies of infertility in the presence of semen parameters that meet the World Health Organization 2010 normative reference values. This committee opinion provides a critical review of the literature, where available, to identify situations where this may or may not be of benefit. This document replaces the previously published document of the same name, last published in 2012 (Fertil Steril 2012;98:1395-9).

Is intracytoplasmic sperm (ICSI) better than traditional in vitro fertilization (IVF): confirmation of higher blastocyst rates per oocyte using a split insemination design

PURPOSE

To explore the effects of traditional vs. intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) insemination method on the outcome of high-quality blastocyst development in a split sibling oocyte cohort.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 62 ICSI/IVF split cycles. Sibling oocytes were randomly assigned to ICSI or IVF insemination. Two hundred thirty-four ICSI-only cycles and 152 IVF-only cycles were also analyzed for comparison. Blastocysts were graded by Gardner's embryo grading and were considered a high-quality blastocyst if 3BB or better (Gardner 1999).

RESULTS

In the ICSI/IVF split group, (1) ICSI oocytes had a higher fertilization rate per oocyte allocated (73% vs 62%, p < 0.001), (2) more high-quality day 2 embryos (69% vs 55%, p < 0.005), (3) ICSI oocytes had a lower blastulation rate per 2PN (46% vs 54%, p < 0.05), but a higher blastulation rate when calculated per oocyte allocated (40% vs 32%, p < 0.05). The ICSI-only group had a lower fertilization rate (65% vs 70%, p < 0.001) but more high-quality day 2 embryos in comparison to the IVF-only group (68% vs 64%, p < .05). The total high-quality blastulation rate was higher for the IVF-only group per 2PN (49% vs 43%, p < 0.05) and per oocyte retrieved (34% vs 28%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This distinctive IVF/ICSI sibling oocyte split design demonstrated a higher-quality blastulation rate in the IVF group compared to the ICSI group when calculated per 2PN, but not per oocyte allocated to each insemination procedure.

Metabolic profile of in vitro derived human embryos is not affected by the mode of fertilization

The pattern of metabolism by early embryos in vitro has been linked to a range of phenotypes, including viability. However, the extent to which metabolic function of embryos is modified by specific methods used during ART has yet to be fully described. This study has sought to determine if the mode of fertilization used to create embryos affects subsequent embryo metabolism of substrates. A metabolic profile, including consumption of key substrates and the endogenous triglyceride content of individual IVF and ICSI supernumerary embryos, was assessed and compared. Embryo development and quality was also recorded. All embryos were donated at a single clinical IVF center, on Day 5, from 36 patients aged 18-38 years, The data revealed that consumption of glucose and pyruvate, and production of lactate, did not differ between embryos created by IVF or ICSI. Similarly, the mode of insemination did not impact on the triglyceride content of embryos. However, ICSI-derived embryos displayed a more active turnover of amino acids (P = 0.023), compared to IVF embryos. The specific amino acids produced in higher quantities from ICSI compared to IVF embryos were aspartate (P = 0.016), asparagine (P = 0.04), histidine (P = 0.021) and threonine (P = 0.009) while leucine consumption was significantly lower (P = 0.04). However, importantly neither individual nor collective differences in amino acid metabolism were apparent for sibling oocytes subjected to either mode of fertilization. Embryo morphology (the number of top grade embryos) and development (proportion reaching the blastocyst stage) were comparable in patients undergoing IVF and ICSI. In conclusion, the microinjection of spermatozoa into oocytes does not appear to have an impact on subsequent metabolism and viability. Observed differences in amino acid metabolism may be attributed to male factor infertility of the patients rather than the ICSI procedure per se.

Can we predict oocyte maturation prior to denudation for intracytoplasmic sperm injection?

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was introduced in 1992 as a method to treat couples with severe male infertility. However, in the last two decades, the use of ICSI has increased substantially even among patients without male factor infertility. In ICSI the oocytes are scrutinized for maturity upon insemination and the immature oocytes are discarded. The aim of the present study was to assess the ability of an experienced embryologist to identify the maturity of the oocytes prior to their denudation.In the present prospective observational study, four experienced embryologists examined the oocytes prior to their denudation and decided whether the oocytes were mature or immature. Later, the oocytes were denudated and the embryologist again examined the oocytes to confirm their prior assumptions.483 oocytes were examined by four embryologists. Three hundred and fifty one of the oocytes were mature (72.7%) and 132 were immature (27.3%). The embryologists were able to correctly identify oocytes maturation status in 85.3% of cases. The embryologists were able to correctly identify 90% of the mature oocytes and 72.7% of the immature oocytes. When they assumed that the oocytes were mature they were correct in 89.% of the cases, while only 74.6% of their prediction that the oocytes were immature were true. To conclude, the embryologists are able to identify the oocytes maturation status before denudation at the majority of the cases. Whenever the oocytes are suspected to be immature, further consideration should be made whether to proceed to ICSI or not.

Higher clinical pregnancy rate with in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in treatment of non-male factor infertility: Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the evidence about in-vitro fertilization (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for the treatment of non-male factor infertility.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases searched using the following MeSH terms (Sperm Injection, Intracytoplasmic) AND (in Vitro Fertilisation) AND (Infertility).

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

All RCTs included infertile patients due to non-male factors underwent IVF or ICSI were considered for this meta-analysis. One-thousand twenty-two studies were identified of which 20 studies deemed eligible for this review.

DATA EXTRACTION

Three independent authors extracted the relevant data from included studies. The study outcomes were pooled in the form of relative risk (RR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) using Mantel-Hansel method. The main outcome measures are the fertilization rate, the implantation rate, the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), the total fertilization failure and the live birth rate.

RESULTS

Regarding the fertilization rate, the pooled estimate did not favour either IVF or ICSI group (RR = 0.94; 95 %CI [0.82, 1.07]; p = 0.34). However, IVF significantly increased the CPR than ICSI (RR = 1.28, 95 %CI [1.11, 1.49]; p = 0.001). The overall effect estimate did not favor either of two groups regarding the implantation rate (RR = 1.25, 95 % CI [0.92, 1.68], p = 0.15). Similarly, no difference between both groups regarding the live birth rate (RR = 1.08, 95 % CI [0.79, 1.49]; p = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

No difference between ICSI and IVF regarding fertilization rate per oocytes, implantation rate and live birth rate in the treatment of non-male factor infertility, while IVF has significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate and higher risk of total fertilization failure.

Conventional IVF improves blastocyst rate and quality compared to ICSI when used in patients with mild or moderate teratozoospermia

The ICSI procedure was invented to treat severe male infertility but is often used even if the sperm quality parameters are normal. This practice has recently been called into question, but there is still no clear answer especially in terms of sperm morphology, regarding when it is necessary to perform ICSI and when conventional IVF is indeed more beneficial. In borderline cases it seems logical to fertilize oocytes using ICSI and conventional IVF at the same time. Since we also use this approach we performed a retrospective analysis of such cycles to elucidate, which procedure results in a better clinical outcome in terms of fertilization rate, the quality of day 3 and day 5 embryos, and the pregnancy rate. The data from fifty-one couples who were treated with ART and whose male factor of infertility was defined as teratozoospermia were included. The fertilization rates were similar between ICSI and conventional IVF groups (per COCs: 54.5% vs. 58.2%, P = 0.322; per MII oocytes: 63.9% vs. 67.2%; P = 0.399), but more oocytes degenerated after ICSI (11.7% vs. 4.3%; P = 0.0003). The quality of cleaved embryos was similar between the groups, but more embryos reached the blastocyst stage after conventional IVF (43.7% vs. 55.0%; P = 0.032) and furthermore, more of them were of good quality (19.8% vs. 29.2%; P = 0.037). The pregnancy rate did not significantly differ between the groups (21.4% vs. 45.5%; P = 0.175), although there was a trend in favor of conventional IVF. This retrospective analysis suggests that when sperm morphology is not severely impaired and sperm concentration and motility are normal, it is better to use conventional IVF to fertilize oocytes and not ICSI. The main advantage of conventional IVF is reflected in improved blastocyst rate and quality.Abbreviations: ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF: in vitro fertilization; COC: cumulus-oocyte complex; COH: controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

Should ICSI be implemented during IVF to all advanced-age patients with non-male factor subfertility?

BACKGROUD

In order to maximize In vitro fertilization (IVF) success rates in advanced- age patients, it has been suggested to favor the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) over conventional insemination (CI), with the notion that ICSI would serve as a tool to overcome interference in sperm oocyte interaction and sperm oocyte penetration issues that can be related to maternal age and are not due to sperm abnormalities. We therefore aim to evaluate the role of ICSI in the treatment of non-male factor infertile patients aged ≥35 in terms of fertilization and top-quality embryo rates.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, data were collected and analyzed for all patients with non-male factor infertility, aged ≥35 treated, undergoing their first IVF cycle attempt with 6 or more oocytes yield, in whom a 50% ICSI-CI division was performed.

RESULTS

Five hundreds and four oocytes were collected from 52 eligible patients. Overall, 245 oocytes underwent ICSI and 259 oocytes underwent CI. The fertilization rate was 71.0% following ICSI, compared to 50.1% in the CI treated oocytes (P < 0.001). The top quality embryo rate was 62.8% following ICSI compared to 45.5% following CI (P < 0.001). Subdividing the study population to two age groups revealed that the above differences remained significant in patients aged 35-39 yrs., whereas in those aged 40-45 yrs., the differences were non-significant but still inclined in favor of ICSI.

CONCLUSIONS

This study favors the use of ICSI in the older IVF population in order to increase both the fertilization rate and the number of top quality embryos that result per IVF cycle. Further studies are needed to establish our observations and use ICSI as the preferred approach to overcome egg sperm abnormal interactions related to advanced maternal age.

In assisted reproduction by IVF or ICSI, the rate at which embryos develop to the blastocyst stage is influenced by the fertilization method used: a split IVF/ICSI study

Purpose

To compare in vitro fertilization (IVF) with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in regard to post-fertilization development and outcome with the purpose of ascertaining the most effective fertilization method for assisted reproduction.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of 136 split IVF/ICSI cycles (where sibling oocytes are fertilized by two different methods using the same sperm sample).

Results

IVF-derived embryos developed to the blastocyst stage at a significantly faster rate than ICSI-derived embryos. There was no significant difference in fertilization or livebirth rates between the two fertilization methods.

Conclusions

For patients with sperm progressive motility ≥ 1.0 × 10⁶/ml (who usually constitute the majority of patients), no significant difference between the two fertilization methods was found in regard to fertilization rate or livebirth rate. Remaining factors influencing choice between the two methods appear to be restricted to convenience, financial considerations and concern with regard to possible perpetuation of genetically linked infertility to future generations.

An ICSI rate of 90% minimizes complete failed fertilization and provides satisfactory implantation rates without elevating fetal abnormalities

IVF cycles utilizing the ICSI technique for fertilization have been rising over the 25 years since its introduction, with indications now extending beyond male factor infertility. We have performed ICSI for 87% of cases compared with the ANZARD average of 67%. This retrospective study reports on the outcomes of 1547 autologous ART treatments undertaken over a recent 3-year period. Based on various indications, cases were managed within 3 groupings - IVF Only, ICSI Only or IVF-ICSI Split insemination where oocytes were randomly allocated. Overall 567 pregnancies arose from mostly single embryo transfer procedures up to December 2016, with 402 live births, comprising 415 infants and a low fetal abnormality rate (1.9%) was recorded. When the data was adjusted for confounders such as maternal age, measures of ovarian reserve and sperm quality, it appeared that IVF-generated and ICSI-generated embryos had a similar chance of both pregnancy and live birth. In the IVF-ICSI Split model, significantly more ICSI-generated embryos were utilised (2.5 vs 1.8; p < 0.003) with productivity rates of 67.8% for pregnancy and 43.4% for livebirths per OPU for this group. We conclude that ART clinics should apply the insemination method which will maximize embryo numbers and the first treatment for unexplained infertility should be undertaken within the IVF-ICSI Split model. Whilst ICSI-generated pregnancies are reported to have a higher rate of fetal abnormalities, our data is consistent with the view that the finding is not due to the ICSI technique per se.

The Outcome of Assisted Reproductive Techniques among Couples with Male Factors at Prince Khalid Bin Sultan Fertility Centre, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND:

Thirty-three percent of infertility due to paternal factors, there are an increasing proportion of couples who decide to conceive by assisted reproductive techniques (ART). The outcome prediction is pivotal for decision making.

AIM:

We aimed to study the pregnancy outcomes of different ART with male factors infertility.

METHODS:

This is retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. One hundred fifteen patients’ records reviewed using a structured checklist to collect demographic data, sperm (concentration, motility, and morphology). Female with significant infertility factor were excluded. Chi-square was used for the outcome of various ART.

RESULTS:

Out of 115 couples with male factors; treated by Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI), In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) and Intrauterine Insemination (IUI); the mean age was 35.2 ± 6.3 years for men and 29.7 ± 5.1 for females. IVF had the highest success rate overall and had a high pregnancy rate with oligospermia and asthenospermia. ICSI has a good outcome for those with azoospermia, severe oligospermia, and teratozoospermia. IUI must be tried as a first line treatment when semen concentration is more than 10 million sperm/ml. all are not significant (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

No significant differences were reported in the pregnancy outcome between various assisted reproductive techniques, smoking, type of infertility and medication.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in IVF-ICSI split insemination cycles

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in sibling oocytes. Additionally, we evaluated whether the implementation of split insemination contributed to an increase in the number of ICSI procedures.

METHODS

A total of 571 cycles in 555 couples undergoing split insemination cycles were included in this study. Among them, 512 cycles (89.7%) were a couple's first IVF cycle. The patients were under 40 years of age and at least 10 oocytes were retrieved in all cycles. Sibling oocytes were randomly allocated to IVF or ICSI.

RESULTS

Total fertilization failure was significantly more common in IVF cycles than in ICSI cycles (4.0% vs. 1.4%, p<0.05), but the low fertilization rate among retrieved oocytes (as defined by fertilization rates greater than 0% but <30%) was significantly higher in ICSI cycles than in IVF cycles (17.2% vs. 11.4%, p<0.05). The fertilization rate of ICSI among injected oocytes was significantly higher than for IVF (72.3%±24.3% vs. 59.2%±25.9%, p<0.001), but the fertilization rate among retrieved oocytes was significantly higher in IVF than in ICSI (59.2%±25.9% vs. 52.1%±22.5%, p<0.001). Embryo quality before embryo transfer was not different between IVF and ICSI. Although the sperm parameters were not different between the first cycle and the second cycle, split insemination or ICSI was performed in 18 of the 95 cycles in which a second IVF cycle was performed.

CONCLUSION

The clinical outcomes did not differ between IVF and ICSI in split insemination cycles. Split insemination can decrease the risk of total fertilization failure. However, unnecessary ICSI is carried out in most split insemination cycles and the use of split insemination might make ICSI more common.

Live birth rates using conventional in vitro fertilization compared to intracytoplasmic sperm injection in Bologna poor responders with a single oocyte retrieved

PURPOSE

To compare reproductive outcomes following conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in poor responders fulfilling the Bologna criteria, with a single oocyte retrieved.

METHODS

The present retrospective study included 243 Bologna poor responders with a single oocyte retrieved, who were categorized into three groups, depending on the fertilization method and semen quality (IVF non-male factor-IVF/NMF n = 101; ICSI non-male factor ICSI/NMF n = 50; ICSI male factor-ICSI/MF n = 92).

RESULTS

In IVF/NMF, ICSI/NMF and ICSI/MF similar fertilization rates [65.3, 66, 58.7%, respectively], proportions of embryo formation [63.4, 60, 53.3%, respectively], proportions of good quality embryos [54.7, 56.7, 57.1%, respectively], implantation rates [8.9, 10, 8.2% respectively] and live birth rates per oocyte retrieval [5.0, 4.0, 3.3%, respectively] were observed. Degeneration rate of oocytes due to mechanical damage was significantly higher after ICSI in the ICSI/NMF and ICSI/MF groups (8 and 6.5%, respectively) compared to IVF/NMF (0%) (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional IVF and ICSI are associated with similar reproductive outcomes in poor responder patients with a single oocyte retrieved. Therefore, the choice of fertilization method should be based primarily on semen quality, in combination with the patient's previous history. A randomized controlled trial should be performed to confirm this study's findings that conventional IVF and ICSI have similar reproductive outcomes in poor responders.

Maternal age and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in infertile couples at Khartoum, Sudan

Background

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was considered as the mainstay of treatment for male infertility. Nowadays, the scope of ICSI has been widened to include other causes of infertility. There are few published data on ICSI in countries with low incomes.

Aims

A cross-sectional study was conducted at Saad AbuAlla and Banoun Centers, Khartoum, Sudan to investigate outcomes of ICSI and to determine the parameters that might predict pregnancy success rate following ICSI.

Methods

The study included 191 infertile couples who underwent 296 ICSI cycles between 1st April 2013 and 31 March 2014.

Results

One hundred and ninety one couples (comprising 296 cycles of ICSI) were enrolled to the study. The mean (SD) number of retrieved oocytes was 9.7 (7.5).  The mean (SD) number of transferred embryos was 2.9 (1.0). Out of these, 50 (26.2%) and 40 (20.9%) had chemical and clinical pregnancy, respectively. Thirty–six couples (18.8%) and five couples (2.6%) had miscarriage and had ectopic pregnancy, respectively. Under logistic regression, younger age (OR = 0.8, 95% CI= 0.81 ─ 0.96, P = 0.004) and endometrial thickness (OR = 1.3, 95% CI= 1.07─1.60, P = 0.009) were the significant predictors for the success of ICSI in inducing pregnancy.

Conclusion                

The rates of successful fertilisation and pregnancy-to-term rates in this setting depend mainly on the maternal age.

Embryo selection strategy in sibling oocytes: a novel approach to measuring the likelihood of single‑embryo transfer using a mouse embryo transfer model

The present study investigated the effect of embryo transfer on post-implantation development using different fertilization approaches in sibling oocyte procedures. C57BL/6, DBA/2, C3H/HeJ and ICR mice were used at 8-10 weeks of age. Mature oocytes were collected, divided into two groups and fertilized using in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Different numbers of the resulting blastocysts were then transferred into recipients and designated as either: The single embryo transfer (SET) I model (one transferred embryo), the SET II model (six transferred embryos) or the multiple embryo transfer (MET) model (24 transferred embryos). The development efficiency, cell number, number of apoptotic cells in blastocysts, pregnancy efficiency, delivery rate and cumulative pregnancy efficiency were analyzed. IVF-fertilized embryos exhibited higher blastocyst development competence and embryo quality compared with ICSI embryos. The pregnancy and delivery efficiency was not identified to be significantly different between the two SET models, but it was lower in these two models than in the MET model. The cumulative pregnancy efficiency in SET models, calculated using a mathematical equation, was not decreased. In conclusion, embryo quality was shown to be the primary factor in selecting embryos prior to embryo transfer using sibling oocytes. In addition, single blastocyst transfer can be performed in sibling oocytes without compromising cumulative pregnancy rates, independent of the fertilization approach.

Conventional IVF as a laboratory strategy to rescue fertility potential in severe poor responder patients: the impact of reproductive aging

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether laboratory strategies can improve in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome in poor responder patients. We compared the effectiveness of conventional IVF and intra cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in assisted reproductive technologies cycles in which only one or two oocytes were retrieved at ovarian pick up, in the absence of male infertility.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of 425 cycles in 386 poor responder patients.

INTERVENTION(S)

Standard stimulation protocol with gonadotropins and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Fertilization rate, cleavage rate, good-quality embryo rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate (PR) and miscarriage rate.

RESULTS

IVF was found to be more advantageous for implantation and PR, especially in patients under 35 years and in women aged between 35 and 38 years. No differences were noted in the other parameter evaluated. Patients aged over 38 years showed no difference using the two techniques.

CONCLUSION

The employment of ICSI in the absence of a male factor can reduce reproductive outcome in poor responder. Probably because of aging-related defects overcoming the advantage of sperm selection, the choice of IVF technique is not relevant to reproductive success when oocyte quality is compromised by reproductive aging. Although further randomized trials are needed to confirm our results, we propose that, in absence of male infertility, conventional IVF might be the technique of choice in young patients, especially in those aged below 35 years.

Should few retrieved oocytes be as an indication for intracytoplasmic sperm injection?

OBJECTIVE

To reevaluate whether relatively few oocytes obtained in one cycle are an indication for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

METHODS

A total of 406 cycles with three or fewer retrieved oocytes performed in 396 non-male infertile couples were retrospectively reviewed. Cycles were classified into three groups by different fertilization techniques: the in vitro fertilization (IVF) group, insemination with conventional IVF; the ICSI group, insemination with ICSI though semen parameters were normal; and the rescue ICSI group, re-insemination with ICSI after conventional IVF failure.

RESULTS

The ICSI group resulted in higher normal fertilization compared with the conventional IVF group. Correspondingly, the cycle cancellation rate was decreased in the ICSI group, though it was not statistically significant. The clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate were lower in the ICSI group compared with the conventional IVF group. Rescue ICSI was a method to avert total fertilization failure in conventional IVF, increasing fertilization and ensuring embryo availability for transfer, but the normal fertilization was the lowest due to delayed insemination and the chance of pregnancy was very little.

CONCLUSIONS

Obtaining only few oocytes in one cycle is not considered as an indication for ICSI when the sperm sample is apparently normal. Rescue ICSI is either not recommended if conventional insemination fails. Such patients should not be subjected to the unnecessary costs and potential risks of ICSI.

Conventional IVF versus ICSI in sibling oocytes from couples with endometriosis and normozoospermic semen

PURPOSE

This study compares the fertilization rate and embryonic development of oocytes randomly inseminated by conventional IVF or ICSI in patients with endometriosis and normozoospermic semen during IVF cycles.

METHODS

Sibling oocytes were randomized to be inseminated either by ICSI or IVF. Rates of fertilization, cleavage, blastulation and embryonic morphology were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 786 sibling cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC) were randomized between insemination by conventional IVF (387 COC) or ICSI (399 COC). A significantly higher fertilization rate was found in the ICSI group (ICSI versus IVF, 73.3±23 % versus 54.7±31.9 % respectively; P=0.003), yielding a higher mean number of day 2 embryos (5.2±3.4 versus 3.6±2.9 respectively; P=0.002). Triploid fertilization rate (3PN/COC) was significantly higher in the IVF group compared to the ICSI group (3.9±8.7 % versus 0.9±3.1 % respectively; P=0.02). The morphology score and rate of development of day 2 and 3 embryos were not different between the two groups. Comparison of embryo transfer cycles in which either IVF or ICSI only embryos were transferred did not reveal any statistically significant differences in pregnancy or implantation rates.

CONCLUSION

ICSI appears to be a better treatment option than conventional IVF in endometriosis-associated infertility, since it offers the advantages of higher fertilization rate and mean number of embryos and lower rate of total fertilization failure and triploid fertilization.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor infertility: a committee opinion

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, while typically effective for overcoming low or absent fertilization in couples with a clear abnormality of semen parameters, is frequently utilized in combination with assisted reproductive technologies for other etiologies of infertility in the presence of normal semen parameters. This committee opinion provides a critical review of the literature, where available, to identify situations where this may or may not be of benefit.

Assisting in vitro fertilization by manipulating cumulus-oocyte-complexes either mechanically or enzymatically does not prevent IVF failure

OBJECTIVE

This prospective study was set up in order to analyze whether additional treatment (cutting off supernumerous cumulus cells; adding hyaluronidase) of the cumulus-oocyte-complex (COC) would help to improve treatment outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

COCs from 50 patients were prospectively subdivided into a control group A (no manipulation of COC) and two study groups. In group B, surplus cumulus cells were cut off using syringes, and in the second study group COCs were incubated with a 1:11 dilution of hyaluronidase (final concentration 7 IU/l). Main outcome measures were fertilization rate, embryo development, as well as rates of implantation, pregnancy, and live birth.

RESULTS

Fertilization was higher in group C as compared to the untreated control group A (p<0.05). However, complete fertilization failure could not be avoided by any of the modified IVF approaches. Compaction on day 4 and blastocyst quality on day 5 were significantly improved in group C as compared to group B (but not to group A). Rates of implantation, pregnancy, and live birth were not affected by any of the methods.

CONCLUSION

ICSI seems to be the only choice for avoiding the vast majority of fertilization failures after IVF.

Should ICSI be recommended routinely in patients with four or fewer oocytes retrieved?

PURPOSE

To determine if patients with a low response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation during IVF benefit from intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 350 IVF cycles in which four or fewer oocytes were retrieved. Severe male factor cases were excluded from analysis. Conventional insemination (CI) and ICSI were compared, with primary outcome measures of fertilization rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer, and pregnancy loss rate.

RESULT(S)

Fertilization rates per oocyte retrieved for CI and ICSI were comparable (51.5% vs. 51.8%). Parallel implantation rates (22% vs. 25%), clinical pregnancy rates (32.8% vs. 33.3%), and loss rates (26.7% vs. 39.5%) were also noted. No difference in cancelled cycles was reported.

CONCLUSION(S)

Our results demonstrate that in the presence of normal semen parameters, low egg number is not an indication to perform ICSI.

[Assisted reproductive technologies place]

There are three kinds of infertility treatment: medical treatment, surgical treatment and assisted reproductive technology (ART). ART includes intra uterine insemination (IUI), in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). ART technologies made a lot of progress last years and their field of applications extended. Through literature reviews, IUI is recommended for unexplained infertility and discussed for male or cervical infertility. IVF is recommended for tubal and unexplained infertility. Limits between IVF and ICSI in case of male infertility remains unclear. In non mal infertility ICSI is not recommended.

Embryonic gene activation in in vitro produced embryos of the domestic cat (Felis catus)

Accurate embryonic gene activation (EGA) is essential for the embryo's developmental potency and reflects the quality ofin vitroproduced embryos. To describe the dynamic and temporal patterns of EGA in the cat, the mRNA expression of developmentally important genes (DNA methyltransferases 1 and 3A,DNMT1andDNMT3A; gap junction protein α 1,GJA1; transcription factor octamer 4,POU5F1(OCT4); insulin-like growth factor (IGF) 1 and 2 receptors,IGF1RandIGF2R) was examined by RT-PCR techniques in preimplantation embryos obtained afterin vitromaturation and IVF. Furthermore, influences of ICSI and sperm cryopreservation on the relative mRNA abundance in 4–5-days-old morulae were analyzed. Total RNA was obtained from immature and matured oocytes, 2-cell embryos, 4-cell embryos, and 8–16-cell embryos, morulae, and blastocysts. RNA was transcribed into single-stranded cDNA by reverse transcriptase. After amplification, a nonfelid standard RNA was used for semiquantitative analysis. Our results showed an increase in transcript abundance from the matured oocyte to the 2-cell embryo for all examined genes except forIGF2R, indicating that,in vitro, the embryonic genome is activated shortly after fertilization. However, the activation pattern varied markedly between the different genes. We also found different patterns of mRNA expression for the examined genes in morulae produced either by IVF or ICSI, and using fresh or cryopreserved sperm. Owing to high variations within the single groups of compared morulae, we were able to observe only a tendency toward higher relative mRNA expression in embryos derived by IVF with fresh sperm in comparison to all other groups.

Comparison of IVF and ICSI when only few oocytes are available for insemination

The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) when few eggs available for insemination. A total of 601 women (group A, mean age 31.2 +/- 2.8 years) who were undergoing a total of 671 assisted reproduction cycles donated their excess oocytes to 694 patients (group B, mean age 41.0 +/- 0.2) for 1606 replacement cycles. Each recipient received three to five eggs. The recipients were divided into two groups depending on the insemination method used (IVF, group B1; or ICSI, group B2); ICSI patients were then subdivided into two further groups based on the semen parameters: B2A adequate for IVF and B2B only suitable for ICSI. The results showed that, when comparing A versus B and B1 versus B2, no significant differences were found in terms of pregnancy (28.0 versus 24.1% and 25.5 versus 21.4%), implantation (15.6 versus 14.9% and 15.9 versus 13.1%) and miscarriage (15.4 versus 20.5% and 17.9 versus 26.3) rates respectively. Comparing subgroups B2A and B2B, no significant differences were found in terms of pregnancy (20.0 versus 21.9%), implantation (14.4 versus 12.7%) and miscarriage rates (18.2 versus 28.6%) respectively. In conclusion, ICSI does not seem to yield better outcomes.

Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility

BACKGROUND Recent advances in our understanding of the causes of infertility and of assisted reproductive technology (ART) have led to the development of complex diagnostic tools, prognostic models and treatment options. The Third Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR) Workshop Meeting was held on 26-27 April 2008 to evaluate evidence supporting current approaches to the diagnosis and management of infertility and to identify areas for future research efforts. METHODS Specialist reproductive medicine clinicians and scientists delivered presentations based on published literature and ongoing research on patient work-up, ovarian stimulation and embryo quality assessment during ART. This report is based on the expert presentations and subsequent group discussions and was supplemented with publications from literature searches and the authors' knowledge. RESULTS It was agreed that single embryo transfer (SET) should be used with increasing frequency in cycles of ART. Continued improvements in cryopreservation techniques, which improve pregnancy rates using supernumerary frozen embryos, are expected to augment the global uptake of SET. Adaptation and personalization of fertility therapy may help to optimize efficacy and safety outcomes for individual patients. Prognostic modelling and personalized management strategies based on individual patient characteristics may prove to represent real progress towards improved treatment. However, at present, there is limited good-quality evidence to support the use of these individualized approaches. CONCLUSIONS Greater quality control and standardization of clinical and laboratory evaluations are required to optimize ART practices and improve individual patient outcomes. Well-designed, good-quality studies are required to drive improvements to the diagnosis and management of ART processes.

PGD for monogenic disorders: aspects of molecular biology

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for monogenic diseases has known a considerable evolution since its first application in the early 1990s. Especially the technical aspects of the genetic diagnosis itself, the single-cell genetic analysis, has constantly evolved to reach levels of accuracy and efficiency nearing those of genetic diagnosis on regular DNA samples. In this review, we will focus on the molecular biological techniques that are currently in use in the most advanced centers for PGD for monogenic disorders, including multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and post-PCR diagnostic methods, whole genome amplification (WGA) and multiple displacement amplification (MDA). As it becomes more and more clear that when it comes to ethically difficult indications, PGD goes further than prenatal diagnosis (PND), we will also briefly discuss ethical issues.

Comparison of ICSI and conventional IVF in patients with increased oocyte immaturity

Using sibling oocytes, the objective of this study was to compare the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) fertilization rates to those achieved with conventional IVF in patients with high rates of oocyte immaturity. This study was observational in nature, and included 91 patients who were treated using split insemination techniques. The fertilization rates for the ICSI group and the IVF group were 41.1 +/- 15.0% and 53.2 +/- 19.8%, respectively (P &lt: 0.0001). There was no significant difference in day-3 embryo quality between the two groups. There was a significantly higher number of embryos frozen in the IVF group than in the ICSI group: 357 (84.8%) and 297 (76.7%), respectively (P = 0.037). Furthermore, the number of embryos either transferred or frozen was significantly higher in the IVF group than the ICSI group: 459 of 1173 (39.1%) and 385 of 1268 (30.4%), respectively (P < 0.0001). These data indicate that conventional IVF results in a higher fertilization rate than ICSI. Furthermore, IVF provided more embryos available for transfer or cryopreservation when compared with ICSI, thereby optimizing the patient's cycle.

[A prospective auto-controlled study to evaluate the interest of selected sperm morphology to inseminate oocytes during IVF]

OBJECTIVES

Since we observed in our laboratory a significant decrease of the fertilization rate in the classical IVF procedure compared to ICSI, we wanted to evaluate a new insemination procedure, using sperm morphology of selected semen as a criterion taken into account to calculate the number of mobile sperm to inseminate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Therefore, we designed a prospective autocontrolled study which took place from September 2006 to May 2007. All IVF attempts resulting from infertile couples were included in the study if a previous analysis (lesser than one year) of sperm parameters performed in our laboratory was assessed as normal. The retrieved oocytes were separated into two groups (sibling ovocytes), inseminated randomly either with the usual procedure (control group) or with the tested protocol (tested group). Fertilization rate was the primary end point to evaluate this assay. Polyspermy rates were also compared. Subsequently, embryonic quality and development were assessed to eliminate an oxidative stress impact. Paired Student t-test was applied for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

In all, 130 couples were included. The diploid fertilization rate was significantly increased in the tested group compared to the control group (66.9% vs 61.3%; p=0.017). No statistically significant difference was showed between the polyspermy rate and numbers of (i) good quality embryos and (ii) blastomeres per embryo into the two groups.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Compared with the conventional insemination procedure, the fertilization rate benefited from the tested insemination method in our laboratory without damaging embryonic growth. In the limit of our procedure, selected sperm morphology should be used to inseminate an appropriate number of spermatozoa within oocytes, even in case of normal semen values.

Comparison of embryo quality between intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization in sibling oocytes

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to compare the quality of embryos derived from sibling oocytes by in vitro fertilization (IVF) or ICSI.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with a less than 40% fertilization rate in a previous standard IVF cycle or with relative male factor infertility were recruited for the study. The oocytes retrieved from each patient were divided into two groups for either conventional insemination (group A) or ICSI (group B). Power analysis showed that to detect a 25% difference in the rate of high-quality embryos between the groups with a power of 0.8, at least 1,200 oocytes were needed in each group.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-seven patients were included in the study. Group A was comprised of 1,526 oocytes and group B of 1,480 sibling oocytes. As expected, the fertilization rate was significantly higher in group B than group A (67.1 vs. 43.6%, p < 0.001). No significant between-group differences were observed in cleavage rate (92.7 and 89.7%, respectively) and the rate of either grade A embryos (22.6 and 23.9%, respectively) or grade A(1) embryos (37.3 and 33.5%, respectively). However, in the subgroup of patients with relative male-factor infertility (n = 36), the rate of grade A(1) embryos was significantly higher in the IVF than the ICSI group (46.4 vs. 29.0%, respectively, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Embryo quality does not seem to be influenced by the mode of fertilization (IVF or ICSI). We assume that embryo quality depends on intrinsic factors of the gametes involved rather than on the fertilization process per se.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in unexplained and stage I endometriosis-associated infertility after fertilization failure with in vitro fertilization (IVF)

PURPOSE

To investigate possible differences between unexplained and stage I endometriosis-associated infertility in ICSI cycles conducted after low fertilization (<20%) in preceding IVF cycles with normal semen parameters.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study consisting of patients with unexplained (n=48) and stage I endometriosis-associated infertility (n=43) with a minimum of one IVF cycle with <20% fertilized oocytes and normal semen quality, treated with ICSI from January 1997 to January 2006. Age matched male factor infertility patients (n=91) were used as controls.

RESULTS

Diploid fertilization rate was significantly lower in the stage I endometriosis-associated infertility group compared to the unexplained infertility group. Score of the transferred embryos, implantation rate, pregnancy rate and outcome were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

ICSI appears to be an efficient treatment option after fertilization failure with IVF in unexplained and stage I endometriosis-associated infertility.

Sibling oocyte submission to IVF and ICSI in unexplained infertility patients: a potential assay for gamete quality

In order to reduce total fertilization failure in unexplained infertility, sibling oocytes were submitted to both conventional IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Two groups of ICSI embryos were compared in unexplained infertility patients: those derived from ICSI when IVF had failed to fertilize, and those derived from ICSI while their sibling oocytes were fertilized by IVF. The outcome of oocytes fertilized exclusively by ICSI (essential ICSI, n = 749) was compared with those fertilized both by IVF and ICSI (non-essential ICSI, n = 957) in all IVF patients treated for unexplained infertility at the Hadassah Hospital (1999-2002). The latter group was further subdivided into ICSI and IVF embryos. Total fertilization rate was 54%. Fertilization rates by ICSI were lower in the essential ICSI compared with the non-essential ICSI group, at 65 and 73% (P < 0.025). Pregnancy rates per embryo transfer in the essential ICSI group (49%), ICSI derived embryos group (55%) and IVF derived embryos (44%) from the non-essential ICSI group, were similar. Implantation rates were lower in the essential ICSI group as compared with the non-essential ICSI group (21 versus 32% respectively; P < 0.05) and 26% for IVF embryos. In conclusion, essential ICSI was associated with lower fertilization and implantation rates.

Blastocyst formation in in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: influence of the fertilization procedure

OBJECTIVE

To compare the quality of early cleaving embryos and blastocysts obtained by IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary infertility center.

PATIENT(S)

Sibling oocytes of 104 patients in 104 IVF vs. ICSI cycles.

INTERVENTION(S)

Cumulus oocyte complexes (n = 1,358) were randomly subjected to ICSI or IVF.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Embryo development and blastocyst formation rate. The blastocyst quality and cycle efficiency were also evaluated.

RESULT(S)

Early embryo cleavage was higher after ICSI (37.1%) compared to IVF (14.1%). The percentage of > or =4-cell embryos on day 2 and > or =8-cell embryos on day 3 was similar for both procedures. The overall blastocyst formation was not different between ICSI (50.2%) and IVF (54.8%), neither was the percentage of good-quality blastocysts (31.3% for ICSI and 36.0% for IVF). The total cycle efficiency (percentage of embryos transferred and frozen per two pronuclei [2PN]) was comparable for the two techniques (51.7% for ICSI and 57.4% for IVF).

CONCLUSION(S)

No differences were found on sibling oocytes in the embryo development and blastocyst formation, irrespective of the fertilization procedure. Earlier suggestions that the ICSI technique may result in impaired blastocyst development were not confirmed in this study.

The role of aromatase inhibitors in ameliorating deleterious effects of ovarian stimulation on outcome of infertility treatment

Clinical utilization of ovulation stimulation to facilitate the ability of a couple to conceive has not only provided a valuable therapeutic approach, but has also yielded extensive information on the physiology of ovarian follicular recruitment, endometrial receptivity and early embryo competency. One of the consequences of the use of fertility enhancing agents for ovarian stimulation has been the creation of a hyperestrogenic state, which may influence each of these parameters. Use of aromatase inhibitors reduces hyperestrogenism inevitably attained during ovarian stimulation. In addition, the adjunct use of aromatase inhibitors during ovarian stimulation reduces amount of gonadotropins required for optimum stimulation. The unique approach of reducing hyperestrogenism, as well as lowering amount of gonadotropins without affecting the number of mature ovarian follicles is an exciting strategy that could result in improvement in the treatment outcome by ameliorating the deleterious effects of the ovarian stimulation on follicular development, endometrial receptivity, as well as oocyte and embryo quality.

Should ICSI be used in non-male factor infertility?

There is general agreement that intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) should be used in male factor infertility cases, such as oligoasthenoteratozoospermia, presence of anti-sperm antibodies, or azoospermia, these cases being diagnosed through abnormal semen analysis. There are no randomized clinical trials comparing ICSI with IVF (or other interventions) where semen quality is so poor that IVF would not achieve fertilization. It is accepted that ICSI is the only treatment option in those circumstances. The role of ICSI where IVF can be expected to give a reasonable fertilization rate is the question that needs to be answered. The argument is whether or not ICSI should be used for all cases of infertility. This paper proposes and strongly supports the use of ICSI for all indications. Considerations of fertilization and embryo development, cost effectiveness and safety will be clearly discussed.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection as a treatment for unexplained total fertilization failure or low fertilization after conventional in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) should be the choice of treatment in case of a previous IVF attempt with unexplained total fertilization failure or low fertilization (<25%).

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Leiden University Medical Center.

PATIENT(S)

Thirty-eight couples undergoing IVF and ICSI on sibling oocytes after a first IVF attempt with total fertilization failure or with low fertilization (<25%).

INTERVENTION(S)

Performing IVF and ICSI on sibling oocytes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Fertilization and (ongoing) pregnancy rate.

RESULT(S)

A total of 271 oocytes were collected in 24 oocyte retrievals in the total fertilization failure group. Hundred nine oocytes were randomly allocated to IVF and 12 were fertilized (11%); 162 sibling oocytes were allocated to ICSI and 78 were fertilized (48%). In 8 of the 24 patients fertilization occurred after IVF. The pregnancy rate after transfer of 1 IVF and 1 ICSI embryo (n = 3) was 67% and after the transfer of 2 ICSI embryos (n = 21) this was 52%. In the low fertilization group 169 oocytes were collected in 14 oocyte retrievals. Seventy-two oocytes were randomly allocated to IVF and 16 were fertilized (22%). Ninety-seven sibling oocytes were allocated to ICSI and 58 were fertilized (60%). In 7 of 14 patients fertilization occurred after IVF. The pregnancy rate after the transfer of 1 IVF and 1 ICSI embryo (n = 5) was 80% and after the transfer of 2 ICSI embryos (n = 9) this was 33%.

CONCLUSION(S)

Performing ICSI on some oocytes of a cohort may avoid total fertilization failures both in patients with a history of total fertilization failure and in patients with a history of low fertilization, as the percentage of fertilization is higher after ICSI compared to IVF and the recurrence of total fertilization failure and low fertilization is high after IVF treatment.

IVF versus ICSI in sibling oocytes from patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This study compares the fertilization rate and embryonic development of oocytes randomly inseminated by conventional IVF or ICSI in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) and normozoospermic semen during IVF cycles.

METHODS

Sibling oocytes were randomized to be inseminated either by ICSI or IVF. Fertilization rate (two pronuclei/COC), day 2 embryonic morphology and rate of development were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 1089 cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC) were collected in 60 cycles (mean+/-SD, 18.2 +/- 7.2). Totals of 541 and 548 COC were inseminated by IVF and ICSI respectively, with a significantly higher fertilization rate in the ICSI group (ICSI versus IVF, 72.3 +/- 15.5 versus 44.8 +/- 25.1%). No fertilization failure occurred in the group of oocytes inseminated by ICSI, whereas the COC in nine patients (15%) inseminated by IVF had complete fertilization failure. The day 2 embryonic morphology and rate of development were not different regardless of the insemination method.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that another randomized controlled study, randomizing patients instead of sibling oocytes, should be undertaken to compare the pregnancy rate per started cycle and to see whether ICSI should be performed on all, or at least on a portion of, oocytes for patients with PCOS undergoing IVF cycles.

PGD for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease type 1

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is primarily characterized by renal cysts and progression to renal failure. It is a genetically heterogeneous disease, with mutations in the PKD1 gene accounting for the majority of cases. Direct mutation detection for PKD1-linked ADPKD or type 1 is complicated by the large size and complex genomic structure of PKD1. This paper describes a microsatellite marker-based assay for PGD in couples at risk of transmitting ADPKD type 1. During PGD, genetic analysis is carried out on single blastomeres biopsied from preimplantation embryos obtained after IVF, and only embryos unaffected by the disease under investigation are selected for transfer. Single-cell genetic analysis relied on a fluorescent duplex-PCR of linked polymorphic markers followed by fragment length determination on an automated sequencer. The co-amplification of the intragenic KG8 and the extragenic D16S291 marker at the single-cell level was evaluated in pre-clinical tests on lymphoblasts and research blastomeres. The developed assay proved to be efficient (96.1% amplification) and accurate (1.4% allele drop-out and 4.3% contamination), and can be applied in all informative ADPKD type 1 couples. From five clinical cycles carried out for three couples, two pregnancies ensued, resulting in the birth of two healthy children.

Conventional in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for sibling oocytes in couples with mild oligoteratoasthenozoospermia and couples with normal sperm

Use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in couples with mild oligoteratoasthenozoospermia decreases the complete fertilization failure rate and may also reduce the embryo cleavage rate. ICSI does not benefit couples with normal sperm.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional in vitro fertilization are complementary techniques in management of unexplained infertility

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of ICSI in unexplained infertility.

METHODS

In 125 cycles with six or more oocytes retrieved per cycle, sibling oocytes were randomly allocated to IVF or ICSI (group A). In 74 cycles with less than six oocytes retrieved per cycle, cycles were allocated to IVF or ICSI (group B).

RESULTS

In group A, ICSI fertilization rate of 61% per allocated oocyte was higher than IVF fertilization rate of 51.6% (P < 0.001). Complete fertilization failure occurred in 19.2 and 0.8% of cycles in IVF and ICSI, respectively (P < 0.001). In group B, fertilization rate in IVF cycles was 53.3% as compared to 60.7% per allocated oocyte in the ICSI cycles (P = 0.29). Complete fertilization failure was higher (P = 0.02) in conventional IVF (34.3%) than ICSI cycles (10.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Allocation of sibling oocytes to IVF and ICSI in the first cycle minimizes risk of fertilization failure. For patients with limited number of oocytes, ICSI technique is recommended.