Impact of trophectoderm biopsy on obstetric and perinatal outcomes following frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles

Current understanding of the pathogenesis of placenta accreta spectrum disorder with focus on mitochondrial function

AIM

The refinement of assisted reproductive technology, including the development of cryopreservation techniques (vitrification) and ovarian stimulation protocols, makes frozen embryo transfer (FET) an alternative to fresh ET and has contributed to the success of assisted reproductive technology. Compared with fresh ET cycles, FET cycles were associated with better in vitro fertilization outcomes; however, the occurrence of pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia, and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) was higher in FET cycles. PAS has been increasing steadily in incidence as a life-threatening condition along with cesarean rates worldwide. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the pathogenesis of PAS and discuss future research directions.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases.

RESULTS

Risk factors associated with PAS incidence include a primary defect of the decidua basalis or scar dehiscence, aberrant vascular remodeling, and abnormally invasive trophoblasts, or a combination thereof. Freezing, thawing, and hormone replacement manipulations have been shown to affect multiple cellular pathways, including cell proliferation, invasion, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and mitochondrial function. Molecules involved in abnormal migration and EMT of extravillous trophoblast cells are beginning to be identified in PAS placentas. Many of these molecules were also found to be involved in mitochondrial biogenesis and dynamics.

CONCLUSION

The etiology of PAS may be a multifactorial genesis with intrinsic predisposition (e.g., placental abnormalities) and certain environmental factors (e.g., defective decidua) as triggers for its development. A distinctive feature of this review is its focus on the potential factors linking mitochondrial function to PAS development.

Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes of preimplantation genetic testing with trophectoderm biopsy: a retrospective cohort study of 3373 intracytoplasmic sperm injection single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles

PURPOSE

To investigate whether trophectoderm biopsy increases the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles.

METHODS

This respective cohort study enrolled 3373 ICSI single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles with and without trophectoderm biopsy. Statistical methods including univariate logistic regression analysis, multivariate logistic regression analysis, and stratified analyses were performed to explore the impact of trophectoderm biopsy on adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

The rates of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two groups. Univariate analysis showed that the live birth rate (45.15% vs. 40.75%; P = 0.010) in the biopsied group was statistically higher than that in the unbiopsied group, and the rates of miscarriage (15.40% vs. 20.00%; P = 0.011) and birth defects (0.58% vs. 2.16%; P = 0.007) were statistically lower in the biopsied group. After adjusting for confounding factors, the rates of miscarriage (aOR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.57-0.96; P = 0.022) and birth defects (aOR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.08-0.70, P = 0.009) in the biopsied group were significantly lower than those in the unbiopsied group. Stratified analyses showed that the birth defects rate after biopsy was significantly reduced in the subgroups of age < 35 years old, BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2, artificial cycle with downregulation, poor-quality blastocysts, and Day 5 poor-quality blastocysts.

CONCLUSION

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) with trophectoderm biopsy does not increase the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in ICSI single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles, and PGT can effectively reduce the rates of miscarriage and birth defects.

Screening embryos for polygenic disease risk: a review of epidemiological, clinical, and ethical considerations

BACKGROUND

The genetic composition of embryos generated by in vitro fertilization (IVF) can be examined with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). Until recently, PGT was limited to detecting single-gene, high-risk pathogenic variants, large structural variants, and aneuploidy. Recent advances have made genome-wide genotyping of IVF embryos feasible and affordable, raising the possibility of screening embryos for their risk of polygenic diseases such as breast cancer, hypertension, diabetes, or schizophrenia. Despite a heated debate around this new technology, called polygenic embryo screening (PES; also PGT-P), it is already available to IVF patients in some countries. Several articles have studied epidemiological, clinical, and ethical perspectives on PES; however, a comprehensive, principled review of this emerging field is missing.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

This review has four main goals. First, given the interdisciplinary nature of PES studies, we aim to provide a self-contained educational background about PES to reproductive specialists interested in the subject. Second, we provide a comprehensive and critical review of arguments for and against the introduction of PES, crystallizing and prioritizing the key issues. We also cover the attitudes of IVF patients, clinicians, and the public towards PES. Third, we distinguish between possible future groups of PES patients, highlighting the benefits and harms pertaining to each group. Finally, our review, which is supported by ESHRE, is intended to aid healthcare professionals and policymakers in decision-making regarding whether to introduce PES in the clinic, and if so, how, and to whom.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched for PubMed-indexed articles published between 1/1/2003 and 1/3/2024 using the terms 'polygenic embryo screening', 'polygenic preimplantation', and 'PGT-P'. We limited the review to primary research papers in English whose main focus was PES for medical conditions. We also included papers that did not appear in the search but were deemed relevant.

OUTCOMES

The main theoretical benefit of PES is a reduction in lifetime polygenic disease risk for children born after screening. The magnitude of the risk reduction has been predicted based on statistical modelling, simulations, and sibling pair analyses. Results based on all methods suggest that under the best-case scenario, large relative risk reductions are possible for one or more diseases. However, as these models abstract several practical limitations, the realized benefits may be smaller, particularly due to a limited number of embryos and unclear future accuracy of the risk estimates. PES may negatively impact patients and their future children, as well as society. The main personal harms are an unindicated IVF treatment, a possible reduction in IVF success rates, and patient confusion, incomplete counselling, and choice overload. The main possible societal harms include discarded embryos, an increasing demand for 'designer babies', overemphasis of the genetic determinants of disease, unequal access, and lower utility in people of non-European ancestries. Benefits and harms will vary across the main potential patient groups, comprising patients already requiring IVF, fertile people with a history of a severe polygenic disease, and fertile healthy people. In the United States, the attitudes of IVF patients and the public towards PES seem positive, while healthcare professionals are cautious, sceptical about clinical utility, and concerned about patient counselling.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

The theoretical potential of PES to reduce risk across multiple polygenic diseases requires further research into its benefits and harms. Given the large number of practical limitations and possible harms, particularly unnecessary IVF treatments and discarded viable embryos, PES should be offered only within a research context before further clarity is achieved regarding its balance of benefits and harms. The gap in attitudes between healthcare professionals and the public needs to be narrowed by expanding public and patient education and providing resources for informative and unbiased genetic counselling.

Does embryo biopsy, independent of vitrification, impact perinatal outcomes? An analysis of perinatal outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing biopsy in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles

Objective

To compare neonatal outcomes in pregnancies resulting from embryos that have undergone preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) biopsy compared with no biopsy in both fresh and frozen embryo transfers (ETs) and determine whether findings are mediated by multiple births.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Society of Assisted Reproductive Technologies-Clinical Outcomes Reporting System data, 2014-2015.

Patients

Autologous in vitro fertilization treatment cycles using fresh or frozen blastocyst ET, with or without PGT biopsy.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Large for gestational age (LGA), small for gestational age, and preterm delivery. Secondary outcomes included high birthweight, low birthweight, and clinical pregnancy measures. Outcomes were evaluated using log-binomial regression models with repeated measures. Models were used to estimate the controlled direct effects of biopsy on birth outcomes that were not mediated by multiple gestations.

Results

In fresh ET, biopsy was associated with an increase in LGA (relative risk [RR] 1.45, confidence interval [CI] 1.04-2.02) that persisted in the model mediated for multiple gestation (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01-1.83) but was not present in an analysis restricted to elective single ET (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91-1.09). In frozen ET, there were no differences in any of the primary outcomes after accounting for multiple gestations.

Conclusions

In a large multicenter database, there were no differences in neonatal outcomes after PGT biopsy in frozen ET cycles, and an increase in LGA was noted in fresh transfers that persisted even after accounting for multiple gestations but was not present in analysis restricted to elective single ET.

Long-term health risk of offspring born from assisted reproductive technologies

Since the world's first in vitro fertilization baby was born in 1978, there have been more than 8 million children conceived through assisted reproductive technologies (ART) worldwide, and a significant proportion of them have reached puberty or young adulthood. Many studies have found that ART increases the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, including preterm birth, low birth weight, small size for gestational age, perinatal mortality, and congenital anomalies. However, data regarding the long-term outcomes of ART offspring are limited. According to the developmental origins of health and disease theory, adverse environments during early life stages may induce adaptive changes and subsequently result in an increased risk of diseases in later life. Increasing evidence also suggests that ART offspring are predisposed to an increased risk of non-communicable diseases, such as malignancies, asthma, obesity, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders. In this review, we summarize the risks for long-term health in ART offspring, discuss the underlying mechanisms, including underlying parental infertility, epigenetic alterations, non-physiological hormone levels, and placental dysfunction, and propose potential strategies to optimize the management of ART and health care of parents and children to eliminate the associated risks. Further ongoing follow-up and research are warranted to determine the effects of ART on the long-term health of ART offspring in later life.

Impact of trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing on obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing is associated with an increased risk of adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes compared with conventional in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection without preimplantation genetic testing.

DATA SOURCES

Entries between January 1990 and August 2022 were searched using MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Publications comparing the outcomes of pregnancies after preimplantation genetic testing using trophectoderm biopsy and in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection were included. Only human studies with a cohort or case-control design or randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion.

METHODS

The study selection process was performed independently by 2 investigators. The quality of the observational studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool version 2 was used to grade the level of bias in randomized controlled trials. The pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated using a random-effects model when substantial heterogeneity occurred (indicated by I2 of >50% and P<.1). Otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 13 studies involving 11,469 live births after preimplantation genetic testing treatment with trophectoderm biopsy before embryo transfer and 20,438 live births after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection only. The odds ratio of preterm delivery was higher in the trophectoderm-biopsied group than in the routine in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection group (pooled odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.21); however, the difference did not exist after sensitivity analysis (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.11). The risk of low birthweight did not increase among the biopsied pregnancies (pooled odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.20). No marked difference was observed in the risk of other obstetrical or neonatal outcomes between the biopsy and control groups. Furthermore, no difference was noted in the perinatal outcomes between trophectoderm-biopsied and nonbiopsied groups in the subgroup analyses by intracytoplasmic sperm injection, frozen-thawed transfer, or single embryo transfer.

CONCLUSION

Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing treatment did not alter the risk of obstetrical or neonatal outcomes compared with conventional in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection without preimplantation genetic testing. However, this study was limited by the large observational evidence base, and more randomized controlled trials are needed to further confirm these findings.

Novel embryo selection strategies-finding the right balance

The use of novel technologies in the selection of embryos during in vitro fertilisation (IVF) has the potential to improve the chances of pregnancy and birth of a healthy child. However, it is important to be aware of the potential risks and unintended consequences that may arise from the premature implementation of these technologies. This article discusses the ethical considerations surrounding the use of novel embryo selection technologies in IVF, including the growing uptake of genetic testing and others, and argues that prioritising embryos for transfer using these technologies is acceptable, but discarding embryos based on unproven advances is not. Several historical examples are provided, which demonstrate possible harms, where the overall chance of pregnancy may have been reduced, and some patients may have missed out on biological parenthood altogether. We emphasise the need for caution and a balanced approach to ensure that the benefits of these technologies outweigh any potential harm. We also highlight the primacy of patients' autonomy in reproductive decision-making, especially when information gained by utilising novel technologies is imprecise.

Polygenic embryo screening: are there potential maternal and fetal harms?

Polygenic embryo screening (PES) and its derivate the Embryo Health Score (EHS) have generated interest in both infertile and fertile populations due to their potential ability to select embryos with a reduced risk of disease and improved long-term health outcomes. Concerns have been raised regarding the potential harms of IVF itself, including possible epigenetic changes that may affect the health of the offspring in late adulthood, which are not fully captured in the EHS calculation. Knowledge of the potential impacts of the trophectoderm biopsy, which is a key component of the PES procedure, on the offsprings' health is limited by the heterogeneity of the population characteristics used in the published studies. Nonetheless, the literature suggests a possible increased risk of preterm delivery, birth defects and pre-eclampsia after trophectoderm biopsy. Overall, the risks of PES for prenatal and postnatal health remain uncertain, and further research is needed. Counselling patients regarding these risks before considering PES is important, to provide an understanding of the risks and benefits. This review aims to highlight some of these issues, the need for continued investigation in this area, and the importance of informed decision-making in the context of PES.

Impact of trophoectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing on serum β-hCG levels, time of delivery and birthweight following frozen embryo transfer cycles

Aim: This study investigated whether trophoectoderm (TE) biopsy adversely impacts serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) level on the 15th day of embryo transfer (ET), delivery week and birthweight, between biopsied and unbiopsied embryo groups, in a cohort of women who delivered a singleton baby, following frozen-thawed ET.Methods: All women having had a live birth after blastocyst ETs following frozen ET cycles with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) were included. A control group was selected among women who had a live birth following single frozen blastocyst transfer without PGT-A at the same period in our clinicResults: One hundred fifteen and 173 cycles with- and without-PGT, respectively, were included. Serum β-hCG level on the 15th day after ET was comparable between the groups (p = .336). Average birthweight of the babies born following biopsied embryos were significantly lower (3200 vs. 3380; p = .027). Women who received trophectoderm biopsied embryos had a significantly higher probability of having a baby weighing ≤1500 g and 1500-2500 g (p = .022) or ≤2500 g (p = .008). Proportion of preterm delivery was significantly higher in the biopsy group (p = .023). However, after adjusting for potential covariates, trophectoderm biopsy did not seem to increase the risk of preterm birth (OR 1.525; 95% CI, 0,644-3.611; p = .338)Conclusions: TE biopsy does not seem to impact serum β-hCG level on the 15th day after ET. Average birthweight is lower when a biopsied embryo was transferred. After adjusting for potential covariates, trophectoderm biopsy does not seem to increase the risk of preterm birth.

Comparison of 1-year cumulative live birth and perinatal outcomes following single blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a propensity score-matched study

PURPOSE

We evaluated whether preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) could increase the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL).

METHODS

The clinical records of 7,668 patients who underwent oocyte retrieval (OR) with or without PGT-A were reviewed for 365 days and retrospectively analyzed. Using propensity score matching, 579 patients in the PGT-A group were matched one-to-one with 7,089 patients in the non-PGT-A (control) group. Their pregnancy and perinatal outcomes and CLBRs were statistically compared.

RESULTS

The live birth rate per single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers (SVBTs) significantly improved in the PGT-A group in all age groups (P < 0.0002, all). Obstetric and perinatal outcomes were comparable between both groups regarding both RIF and RPL cases. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that in the RIF cases, the risk ratio per OR was significantly lower in the PGT-A group than in the control group (P = 0.0480), particularly in women aged < 40 years (P = 0.0364). However, the ratio was comparable between the groups in RPL cases. The risk ratio per treatment period was improved in the PGT-A group in both RIF and RPL cases only in women aged 40-42 years (P = 0.0234 and P = 0.0084, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Increased CLBR per treatment period was detected only in women aged 40-42 years in both RIF and RPL cases, suggesting that PGT-A is inappropriate to improve CLBR per treatment period in all RIF and RPL cases.

Cleavage-stage or blastocyst-stage embryo biopsy has no impact on growth and health in children up to 2 years of age

BACKGROUND

Studies show conflicting results on neonatal outcomes following embryo biopsy for PGT, primarily due to small sample sizes and/or heterogeneity in the timing of embryo biopsy (day 3; EBD3 or day 5/6; EBD5) and type of embryo transfer. Even fewer data exist on the impact on children's health beyond the neonatal period. This study aimed to explore outcomes in children born after EBD3 or EBD5 followed by fresh (FRESH) or frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET).

METHODS

This single-centre cohort study compared birth data of 630 children after EBD3, of 222 EBD5 and of 1532 after non-biopsied embryo transfers performed between 2014 and 2018. Follow-up data on growth were available for 426, 131 and 662 children, respectively.

RESULTS

Embryo biopsy, either at EBD3 or EBD5 in FET and FRESH cycles did not negatively affect anthropometry at birth, infancy or childhood compared to outcomes in non-biopsied FET and FRESH cycles. While there was no adverse effect of the timing of embryo biopsy (EBD3 versus EBD5), children born after EBD3 followed by FET had larger sizes at birth, but not thereafter, than children born after EBD3 followed by FRESH. Reassuringly, weight and height gain, proportions of major congenital malformations, developmental problems, hospital admissions and surgical interventions were similar between comparison groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicated that neither EBD3 nor EBD5 followed by FRESH or FET had a negative impact on anthropometry and on health outcomes up to 2 years of age.

Uterus transplantation: from research, through human trials and into the future

Women suffering from absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI) had no hope of childbearing until clinical feasibility of uterus transplantation (UTx) was documented in 2014 with the birth of a healthy baby. This landmark accomplishment followed extensive foundational work with a wide range of animal species including higher primates. In the present review, we provide a summary of the animal research and describe the results of cases and clinical trials on UTx. Surgical advances for graft removal from live donors and transplantation to recipients are improving, with a recent trend away from laparotomy to robotic approaches, although challenges persist regarding optimum immunosuppressive therapies and tests for graft rejection. Because UTx does not involve transplantation of the Fallopian tubes, IVF is required as part of the UTx process. We provide a unique focus on the intersection between these two processes, with consideration of when oocyte retrieval should be performed, whether, and for whom, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy should be used, whether oocytes or embryos should be frozen and when the first embryo transfer should be performed post-UTx. We also address the utility of an international society UTx (ISUTx) registry for assessing overall UTx success rates, complications, and live births. The long-term health outcomes of all parties involved-the uterus donor (if live donor), the recipient, her partner and any children born from the transplanted graft-are also reviewed. Unlike traditional solid organ transplantation procedures, UTx is not lifesaving, but is life-giving, although as with traditional types of transplantation, costs, and ethical considerations are inevitable. We discuss the likelihood that costs will decrease as efficiency and efficacy improve, and that ethical complexities for and against acceptability of the procedure sharpen the distinctions between genetic, gestational, and social parenthood. As more programs wish to offer the procedure, we suggest a scheme for setting up a UTx program as well as future directions of this rapidly evolving field. In our 2010 review, we described the future of clinical UTx based on development of the procedure in animal models. This Grand Theme Review offers a closing loop to this previous review of more than a decade ago. The clinical feasibility of UTx has now been proved. Advancements include widening the criteria for acceptance of donors and recipients, improving surgery, shortening time to pregnancy, and improving post-UTx management. Together, these improvements catalyze the transition of UTx from experimental into mainstream clinical practice. The procedure will then represent a realistic and accessible alternative to gestational surrogacy for the treatment of AUFI and should become part of the armamentarium of reproductive specialists worldwide.

Semen processing using magnetic-activated cell sorting before ICSI is deemed safe for obstetric and perinatal outcomes: a retrospective multicentre study

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) a safe semen sample processing technique for newborns and mothers when used for semen processing prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles?

DESIGN

This retrospective multicentre cohort study involved patients undergoing ICSI cycles with either donor or autologous oocytes from January 2008 to February 2020. They were divided into two groups: those who underwent standard semen preparation (reference group) and those who had an added MACS procedure (MACS group). A total of 25,356 deliveries were assessed in the case of cycles using donor oocytes, and 19,703 deliveries from cycles using autologous oocytes. Of these, 20,439 and 15,917, respectively, were singleton deliveries. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes were retrospectively assessed. All means, rates and incidences were computed per live newborn in each study group.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the main obstetric and perinatal morbidities affecting the mothers' and newborns' well-being between groups using either donated or autologous oocytes. There was a significant increase in the incidence of gestational anaemia in both subpopulations (donor oocytes P = 0.01; autologous oocytes P < 0.001). However, this incidence was within the estimated prevalence for gestational anaemia in the general population. There was a statistically significant decrease in preterm (P = 0.02) and very preterm (P = 0.01) birth rates in the MACS group in cycles using donor oocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of MACS during semen preparation before ICSI using either donor or autologous oocytes appears to be safe for the mothers' and newborns' well-being during pregnancy and birth. Nevertheless, a close follow-up of these parameters in the future is advised, especially concerning anaemia, in order to detect even smaller effect sizes.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is not related to adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies

STUDY QUESTION

What is the potential impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) on obstetric and neonatal outcomes?

SUMMARY ANSWER

PGT-A is not associated with increased rates of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies following IVF/ICSI cycles.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

PGT-A pregnancies may be associated with increased risks of lower birthweight, preterm delivery, and hypertensive disorders compared with natural pregnancies. In a recent meta-analysis, the overall obstetric and neonatal outcomes of PGT-A pregnancies were favorable compared with those of IVF/ICSI pregnancies, although PGT-A pregnancies were associated with a higher risk of hypertensive disorders.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed in University-affiliated infertility centers. Single live births following IVF/ICSI between October 2016 and January 2021 were included in the study.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

A total of 7146 live births after single embryo transfers with (n = 3296) or without (n = 3850) PGT-A were included. The primary outcome was pre-eclampsia and secondary outcomes included gestational diabetes, low birthweight and very low birthweight, cesarean section delivery, emergency cesarean section, as well as preterm birth, birthweight, congenital abnormalities, neonatal sex, Apgar score at 5 min, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. In a subgroup analysis, were included only blastocysts screened with next-generation sequencing (NGS).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Univariate analysis showed that pre-eclampsia, cesarean section incidence, and low Apgar score were higher in women undergoing PGT-A. However, after performing multivariate logistic and linear regression models accounting for many possible confounders, pregnancies that had been conceived after embryo biopsy showed no increase in adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. The subgroup analysis including patients with blastocysts screened by NGS showed a decreased risk of preterm birth in the group undergoing PGT-A.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Caution should be used when interpreting the data because of its limitations, mainly related to its retrospective design. Although this is a large multicenter study, data acquisition included self-reporting questionnaires, and the deliveries occurred in different institutions with distinct protocols.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The current study does not show any major adverse clinical outcomes after PGT-A. Efforts should be made to promote good quality research on embryo biopsy in terms of neonatal and obstetric outcomes, as well as its long-term consequences.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No specific funding was obtained for this study. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of letrozole versus natural cycle frozen embryo transfer of autologous euploid blastocyst

PURPOSE

To investigate the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of letrozole-stimulated frozen embryo transfer (LTZ-FET) cycles compared with natural FET cycles (NC-FET).

METHODS

Our retrospective cohort included all LTZ-FET (n = 161) and NC-FET (n = 575) cycles that transferred a single euploid autologous blastocyst from 2016 to 2020 at Stanford Fertility Center. The LTZ-FET protocol entailed 5 mg of daily letrozole for 5 days starting on cycle day 2 or 3. Outcomes were compared using absolute standardized differences (ASD), in which a larger ASD signifies a larger difference. Multivariable regression models adjusted for confounders: maternal age, BMI, nulliparity, embryo grade, race, infertility diagnosis, and endometrial thickness.

RESULTS

The demographic and clinical characteristics were overall similar. A greater proportion of the letrozole cohort was multiparous, transferred high-graded embryos, and had ovulatory dysfunction. The cohorts had similar pregnancy rates (67.1% LTZ vs 62.1% NC; aOR 1.31, P = 0.21) and live birth rates (60.9% LTZ vs 58.6% NC; aOR 1.17, P = 0.46). LTZ-FET neonates on average were born 5.7 days earlier (P < 0.001) and had higher prevalence of prematurity (18.6% vs. 8.0%NC, ASD = 0.32) and low birth weight (10.4% vs. 5.0%, ASD = 0.20). Both cohorts' median gestational ages (38 weeks and 1 day for LTZ; 39 weeks and 0 day for NC) were full term.

CONCLUSION

There were similar rates of pregnancy and live birth between LTZ-FET and NC-FET cycles. However, there was a higher prevalence of prematurity and low birth weight among LTZ-FET neonates. Reassuringly, the median gestational age in both cohorts was full term, and while the difference in gestational length of almost 6 days does not appear to be clinically significant, this warrants larger studies.

Effectiveness of non-invasive chromosomal screening for normal karyotype and chromosomal rearrangements

Purpose: To study the accuracy of non-invasive chromosomal screening (NICS) results, in normal chromosomes and chromosomal rearrangement groups and to investigate whether using trophoblast cell biopsy along with NICS, to choose embryos for transfer can improve the clinical outcomes of assisted pregnancy.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 101 couples who underwent preimplantation genetic testing at our center from January 2019 to June 2021 and collected 492 blastocysts for trophocyte (TE) biopsy. D3-5 blastocyst culture fluid and blastocyst cavity fluid were collected for the NICS. Amongst them, 278 blastocysts (58 couples) and 214 blastocysts (43 couples) were included in the normal chromosomes and chromosomal rearrangement groups, respectively. Couples undergoing embryo transfer were divided into group A, in which both the NICS and TE biopsy results were euploid (52 embryos), and group B, in which the TE biopsy results were euploid and the NICS results were aneuploid (33 embryos).

Results: In the normal karyotype group, concordance for embryo ploidy was 78.1%, sensitivity was 94.9%, specificity was 51.4%, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 75.7%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 86.4%. In the chromosomal rearrangement group, concordance for embryo ploidy was 73.1%, sensitivity was 93.3%, specificity was 53.3%, the PPV was 66.3%, and the NPV was 89%. In euploid TE/euploid NICS group, 52 embryos were transferred; the clinical pregnancy rate was 71.2%, miscarriage rate was 5.4%, and ongoing pregnancy rate was 67.3%. In euploid TE/aneuploid NICS group, 33 embryos were transferred; the clinic pregnancy rate was 54.5%, miscarriage rate was 5.6%, and ongoingpregnancy rate was 51.5%. The clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates were higher in the TE and NICS euploid group.

Conclusion: NICS was similarly effective in assessing both normal and abnormal populations. Identification of euploidy and aneuploidy alone may lead to the wastage of embryos due to high false positives. More suitable reporting methods for NICS and countermeasures for a high number of false positives in NICS are needed. In summary, our results suggest that combining biopsy and NICS results could improve the outcomes of assisted pregnancy.

Trophectoderm biopsy is associated with adverse obstetric outcomes rather than neonatal outcomes

BACKGROUND

With the wide application of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) with trophectoderm (TE) biopsy, the safety of PGT has always been a concern. Since TE subsequently forms the placenta, it is speculated that the removal of these cells was associated with adverse obstetrical or neonatal outcomes after single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (FBT). Previous studies report contradictory findings with respect to TE biopsy and obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 720 patients with singleton pregnancies from single FBT cycles who delivered at the same university-affiliated hospital between January 2019 and March 2022. The cohorts were divided into two groups: the PGT group (blastocysts with TE biopsy, n = 223) and the control group (blastocysts without biopsy, n = 497). The PGT group was matched with the control group by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis at a ratio of 1:2. The enrolled sample sizes in the two groups were 215 and 385, respectively.

RESULTS

Patient demographic characteristics were comparable between the groups after PSM except for the proportion of recurrent pregnancy loss, which was significantly higher in the PGT cohort (31.2 vs. 4.2%, P < 0.001). Patients in the PGT group had significantly higher rates of gestational hypertension (6.0 vs. 2.6%, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18-7.18, P = 0.020) and abnormal umbilical cord (13.0 vs. 7.8%, aOR 1.94, 95% CI 1.08-3.48, P = 0.026). However, the occurrence of premature rupture of membranes (PROM) (12.1 vs. 19.7%, aOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35-0.99, P = 0.047) was significantly lower in biopsied blastocysts than in unbiopsied embryos. There were no significant differences in regard to other obstetric and neonatal outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Trophectoderm biopsy is a safe approach, as the neonatal outcomes from biopsied and unbiopsied embryos were comparable. Furthermore, PGT is associated with higher risks of gestational hypertension and abnormal umbilical cord but may have a protective effect on PROM.

Concordance of PGT for aneuploidies between blastocyst biopsies and spent blastocyst culture medium

RESEARCH QUESTION

Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (niPGT-A) avoids the possible detrimental impact of invasive PGT-A on embryo development and clinical outcomes. Does cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from spent blastocyst culture medium (BCM) reflect embryonic chromosome status better than trophectoderm (TE) biopsy?

DESIGN

In this study, 35 donated embryos were used for research and the BCM, TE biopsy, inner cell mass (ICM) and residual blastocyst (RB) were individually picked up from these embryos. Whole genome amplification (WGA) was performed and amplified DNA was subject to next-generation sequencing. Chromosome status concordance was compared among the groups of samples.

RESULTS

The WGA success rates were 97.0% (TE biopsy), 100% (ICM), 97.0% (RB) and 88.6% (BCM). Using ICM as the gold standard, the chromosomal ploidy concordance rates for BCM, TE biopsy and RB were 58.33% (14/24), 68.75% (22/32) and 78.57% (22/28); the diagnostic concordance rates were 83.33% (20/24), 87.50% (28/32) and 92.86% (26/28); and the sex concordance rates were 92.31% (24/26), 100% (32/32) and 100% (28/28), respectively. Considering RB the gold standard, the chromosome ploidy concordance rates for BCM and TE biopsy were 61.90% (13/21) and 81.48% (22/27); the diagnostic concordance rates were 71.43% (15/21) and 88.89% (24/27); and the sex concordance rates were 91.30% (21/23) and 100% (27/27), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of niPGT-A of cfDNA of spent BCM are comparable to those of invasive PGT-A of TE biopsies. Modifications of embryo culture conditions and testing methods will help reduce maternal DNA contamination and improve the reliability of niPGT-A.

Obstetric, neonatal, and child health outcomes following embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing

BACKGROUND

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) of embryos developed in vitro requires a biopsy for obtaining cellular samples for the analysis. Signs of cell injury have been described in association with this procedure. Thus, the consequences of the biopsy on obstetric and neonatal outcomes have been the subject of some quantitative analyses, although the reliability of data pooling may be limited by important issues in the various reports.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The present review identifies evidence for whether pregnancies conceived after embryo biopsy are associated with a higher risk of adverse obstetric, neonatal, and long-term outcomes. Available evidence has been summarized considering manipulation at various stages of embryo development.

SEARCH METHODS

We used the scoping review methodology. Searches of article databases were performed with keywords pertaining to the embryo biopsy technique and obstetric, neonatal, and postnatal outcomes. Studies in which embryos were biopsied at different stages (i.e. both at the cleavage and blastocyst stages) were excluded. We included data on fresh and frozen embryo transfers. The final sample of 31 documents was subjected to qualitative thematic analysis.

OUTCOMES

Sound evidence is lacking to fully address the issues on the potential obstetric, neonatal or long-term consequences of embryo biopsy. For polar body biopsy, the literature is too scant to draw any conclusion. Some data, although limited and controversial, suggest a possible association of embryo biopsy at the cleavage stage with an increased risk of low birthweight and small for gestational age neonates compared to babies derived from non-biopsied embryos. An increase in preterm deliveries and birth defects in cases of trophectoderm biopsy was suggested. For both biopsy methods (at the cleavage and blastocyst stages), an increased risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was found. However, these findings may be explained by confounders such as other embryo manipulation procedures or by intrinsic patient or population characteristics.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Since there is inadequate evidence to assess obstetric, neonatal, and long-term health outcomes following embryo biopsy, an invasive PGT strategy should be developed with a cautious approach. A non-invasive approach, based on the analysis of embryo cell-free DNA, needs to be pursued to overcome the potential limitations of embryo biopsy.

Assisted Reproductive Technology without Embryo Discarding or Freezing in Women ≥40 Years: A 5-Year Retrospective Study at a Single Center in Italy

The protocols commonly used in assisted reproductive technology (ART) consist of long-term embryo culture up to the blastocyst stage after the insemination of all mature oocytes, the freezing of all the embryos produced, and their subsequent transfer one by one. These practices, along with preimplantation genetic testing, although developed to improve the live birth rate (LBR) and reduce the risk of multiple pregnancies, are drawing attention to the possible increase in obstetric and perinatal risks, and adverse epigenetic consequences in offspring. Furthermore, ethical-legal concerns are growing regarding the increase in cryopreservation and storage of frozen embryos. In an attempt to reduce the risk associated with prolonged embryo culture and avoid embryo storage, we have chosen to inseminate a limited number of oocytes not exceeding the number of embryos to be transferred, after two days or less of culture. We retrospectively analyzed 245 ICSI cycles performed in 184 infertile couples with a female partner aged ≥40 from January 2016 to July 2021. The results showed a fertilization rate of 95.7%, a miscarriage rate of 48.9%, and a LBR of 10% with twin pregnancies of 16.7%. The cumulative LBR in our group of couples was 13%. No embryos were frozen. In conclusion, these results suggest that oocyte selection and embryo transfer at the cleaving stage constitute a practice that has a LBR comparable to that of the more commonly used protocols in older women who have reduced ovarian reserve.

An Update on Non-invasive Approaches for Genetic Testing of the Preimplantation Embryo

Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) aims to reduce the chance of an affected pregnancy or improve success in an assisted reproduction cycle. Since the first established pregnancies in 1990, methodological approaches have greatly evolved, combined with significant advances in the embryological laboratory. The application of preimplantation testing has expanded, while the accuracy and reliability of monogenic and chromosomal analysis have improved. The procedure traditionally employs an invasive approach to assess the nucleic acid content of embryos. All biopsy procedures require high technical skill, and costly equipment, and may impact both the accuracy of genetic testing and embryo viability. To overcome these limitations, many researchers have focused on the analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) at the preimplantation stage, sampled either from the blastocoel or embryo culture media, to determine the genetic status of the embryo non-invasively. Studies have assessed the origin of cfDNA and its application in non-invasive testing for monogenic disease and chromosomal aneuploidies. Herein, we discuss the state-of-the-art for modern non-invasive embryonic genetic material assessment in the context of PGT. The results are difficult to integrate due to numerous methodological differences between the studies, while further work is required to assess the suitability of cfDNA analysis for clinical application.

Comment on the recent PGDIS Position Statement on the Transfer of Mosaic Embryos 2021

The worldwide demand of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is still growing. However, chromosomal mosaic results greatly challenge the clinical practice. The recently published PGDIS Position Statement on the Transfer of Mosaic Embryos is the third PGDIS position statement on how to deal with embryos diagnosed as chromosomal mosaics (CM) and, one of many attempts of different societies and working groups to provide a guideline for clinicians, laboratories, clinics, and genetic counselors. But still, as in previous statements, many issues remained unresolved. Moreover, from our point of view, the question how to deal with embryos diagnosed as CM, consisting of two or more karyological cell lines cannot be separated from all the other aspects of PGT-A including its accuracy. The paucity of clearcut indications for PGT-A and evidence of benefit as well as an overall cost-benefit assessment is given below.

Development of an artificial intelligence model for predicting the likelihood of human embryo euploidy based on blastocyst images from multiple imaging systems during IVF

STUDY QUESTION

Can an artificial intelligence (AI) model predict human embryo ploidy status using static images captured by optical light microscopy?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Results demonstrated predictive accuracy for embryo euploidy and showed a significant correlation between AI score and euploidy rate, based on assessment of images of blastocysts at Day 5 after IVF.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Euploid embryos displaying the normal human chromosomal complement of 46 chromosomes are preferentially selected for transfer over aneuploid embryos (abnormal complement), as they are associated with improved clinical outcomes. Currently, evaluation of embryo genetic status is most commonly performed by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), which involves embryo biopsy and genetic testing. The potential for embryo damage during biopsy, and the non-uniform nature of aneuploid cells in mosaic embryos, has prompted investigation of additional, non-invasive, whole embryo methods for evaluation of embryo genetic status.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A total of 15 192 blastocyst-stage embryo images with associated clinical outcomes were provided by 10 different IVF clinics in the USA, India, Spain and Malaysia. The majority of data were retrospective, with two additional prospectively collected blind datasets provided by IVF clinics using the genetics AI model in clinical practice. Of these images, a total of 5050 images of embryos on Day 5 of in vitro culture were used for the development of the AI model. These Day 5 images were provided for 2438 consecutively treated women who had undergone IVF procedures in the USA between 2011 and 2020. The remaining images were used for evaluation of performance in different settings, or otherwise excluded for not matching the inclusion criteria.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The genetics AI model was trained using static 2-dimensional optical light microscope images of Day 5 blastocysts with linked genetic metadata obtained from PGT-A. The endpoint was ploidy status (euploid or aneuploid) based on PGT-A results. Predictive accuracy was determined by evaluating sensitivity (correct prediction of euploid), specificity (correct prediction of aneuploid) and overall accuracy. The Matthew correlation coefficient and receiver-operating characteristic curves and precision-recall curves (including AUC values), were also determined. Performance was also evaluated using correlation analyses and simulated cohort studies to evaluate ranking ability for euploid enrichment.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Overall accuracy for the prediction of euploidy on a blind test dataset was 65.3%, with a sensitivity of 74.6%. When the blind test dataset was cleansed of poor quality and mislabeled images, overall accuracy increased to 77.4%. This performance may be relevant to clinical situations where confounding factors, such as variability in PGT-A testing, have been accounted for. There was a significant positive correlation between AI score and the proportion of euploid embryos, with very high scoring embryos (9.0-10.0) twice as likely to be euploid than the lowest-scoring embryos (0.0-2.4). When using the genetics AI model to rank embryos in a cohort, the probability of the top-ranked embryo being euploid was 82.4%, which was 26.4% more effective than using random ranking, and ∼13-19% more effective than using the Gardner score. The probability increased to 97.0% when considering the likelihood of one of the top two ranked embryos being euploid, and the probability of both top two ranked embryos being euploid was 66.4%. Additional analyses showed that the AI model generalized well to different patient demographics and could also be used for the evaluation of Day 6 embryos and for images taken using multiple time-lapse systems. Results suggested that the AI model could potentially be used to differentiate mosaic embryos based on the level of mosaicism.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

While the current investigation was performed using both retrospectively and prospectively collected data, it will be important to continue to evaluate real-world use of the genetics AI model. The endpoint described was euploidy based on the clinical outcome of PGT-A results only, so predictive accuracy for genetic status in utero or at birth was not evaluated. Rebiopsy studies of embryos using a range of PGT-A methods indicated a degree of variability in PGT-A results, which must be considered when interpreting the performance of the AI model.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

These findings collectively support the use of this genetics AI model for the evaluation of embryo ploidy status in a clinical setting. Results can be used to aid in prioritizing and enriching for embryos that are likely to be euploid for multiple clinical purposes, including selection for transfer in the absence of alternative genetic testing methods, selection for cryopreservation for future use or selection for further confirmatory PGT-A testing, as required.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

Life Whisperer Diagnostics is a wholly owned subsidiary of the parent company, Presagen Holdings Pty Ltd. Funding for the study was provided by Presagen with grant funding received from the South Australian Government: Research, Commercialisation, and Startup Fund (RCSF). 'In kind' support and embryology expertise to guide algorithm development were provided by Ovation Fertility. 'In kind' support in terms of computational resources provided through the Amazon Web Services (AWS) Activate Program. J.M.M.H., D.P. and M.P. are co-owners of Life Whisperer and Presagen. S.M.D., M.A.D. and T.V.N. are employees or former employees of Life Whisperer. S.M.D, J.M.M.H, M.A.D, T.V.N., D.P. and M.P. are listed as inventors of patents relating to this work, and also have stock options in the parent company Presagen. M.V. sits on the advisory board for the global distributor of the technology described in this study and also received support for attending meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Polygenic risk score for embryo selection—not ready for prime time

Numerous chronic diseases have a substantial hereditary component. Recent advances in human genetics have allowed the extent of this to be quantified via genome-wide association studies, producing polygenic risk scores (PRS), which can then be applied to individuals to estimate their risk of developing a disease in question. This technology has recently been applied to embryo selection in the setting of IVF and preimplantation genetic testing, with limited data to support its utility. Furthermore, there are concerns that the inherent limitations of PRS makes it ill-suited for use as a screening test in this setting. There are also serious ethical and moral questions associated with this technology that are yet to be addressed. We conclude that further research and ethical reflection are required before embryo selection based on PRS is offered to patients outside of the research setting.

Polygenic embryo screening: four clinical considerations warrant further attention

Recent advances in developing polygenic scores have made it possible to screen embryos for common, complex conditions and traits. Polygenic embryo screening (PES) is currently offered commercially, and though there has been much recent media and academic coverage, reproductive specialists' points of view have not yet been prominent in these discussions. We convened a roundtable of multidisciplinary experts, including reproductive specialists to discuss PES and its implications. In this Opinion, we describe four clinically relevant issues associated with the use of PES that have not yet been discussed in the literature and warrant consideration.

Perinatal outcomes of singleton live births after preimplantation genetic testing during single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles: a propensity score-matched study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether singleton pregnancy achieved after preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is associated with a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes than in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) singleton pregnancy.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A university-affiliated fertility center.

PATIENT(S)

This cohort study included singleton live births resulting from PGT (n = 232) and IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies (n = 2,829) with single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer. Multiple baseline covariates were used for propensity score matching, yielding 214 PGT singleton pregnancies matched to 617 IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies.

INTERVENTION(S)

Trophectoderm biopsy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome was gestational hypertension, and various clinical perinatal secondary outcomes related to maternal and neonatal health were measured.

RESULT(S)

Compared with IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancy, PGT singleton pregnancy was associated with a significantly higher risk of gestational hypertension (adjusted odds ratio, 2.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.32, 5.05). In the matched sample, the risk of gestational hypertension remained higher with PGT singleton pregnancy (odds ratio, 2.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.04, 5.22) than with IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancy. No statistical differences were noted in any other measured outcomes between the groups.

CONCLUSION(S)

The perinatal outcomes of PGT and IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies were similar except for the observed potentially higher risk of gestational hypertension with PGT singleton pregnancy. However, because the data on PGT singleton pregnancies are limited, this conclusion warrants further investigation.

Placental Dysfunction in Assisted Reproductive Pregnancies: Perinatal, Neonatal and Adult Life Outcomes

Obstetric and newborn outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancies are associated with significative prevalence of maternal and neonatal adverse health conditions, such as cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. These data are interpreted as anomalies in placentation involving a dysregulation of several molecular factors and pathways. It is not clear which extent of the observed placental alterations are the result of ART and which originate from infertility itself. These two aspects probably act synergically for the final obstetric risk. Data show that mechanisms of inappropriate trophoblast invasion and consequent altered vascular remodeling sustain several clinical conditions, leading to obstetric and perinatal risks often found in ART pregnancies, such as preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction and placenta previa or accreta. The roles of factors such as VEGF, GATA3, PIGF, sFLT-1, sEndoglin, EGFL7, melatonin and of ART conditions, such as short or long embryo cultures, trophectoderm biopsy, embryo cryopreservation, and supraphysiologic endometrium preparation, are discussed. Inflammatory local conditions and epigenetic influence on embryos of ART procedures are important research topics since they may have important consequences on obstetric risk. Prevention and treatment of these conditions represent new frontiers for clinicians and biologists involved in ART, and synergic actions with researchers at molecular levels are advocated.

Trophectoderm Biopsy Differentially Influences the Level of Serum β-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin With Different Embryonic Trophectoderm Scores in Early Pregnancy From 7847 Single-Blastocyst Transfer Cycles

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether trophectoderm (TE) biopsy differentially influence the level of serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) with different TE-scored blastocysts transferred in early pregnancy.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study contained 7847 single-blastocyst transfer cycles executed between January 2019 and June 2020, including 2657 preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles and 5190 in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. All cycles were classified into biopsy and control groups, and further stratified based on the TE morphological scores into three subgroups: grades A, B, and C for TE scores, respectively. Intra-group and inter-group analyses were performed on serum β-hCG levels on the 12th day after blastocyst transfer (HCG₁₂), and obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

For cycles with a live birth, in grade A TE score subgroups, the HCG₁₂ level did not exhibit statistical significance between the control and biopsy groups after adjustment (769 mIU/mL vs. 753 mIU/mL, P=0.631). In contrast, in grade B and C TE score subgroups, the control group showed a significantly higher level of HCG₁₂ relative to the biopsy group (690 mIU/mL vs. 649 mIU/mL, P=0.001; 586 mIU/mL vs. 509 mIU/mL, P<0.001, respectively). We observed no statistically significant differences in obvious adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes between the same TE-score subgroups of the biopsy group and control group.

CONCLUSIONS

While blastocysts with higher TE grades produced higher serum β-hCG levels in early pregnancy, TE biopsy might exert a negative impact on serum β-hCG levels by blastocysts with a grade-B TE score and below. TE biopsy did not increase the risk for adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

Non-Assisted Hatching Trophectoderm Biopsy Does Not Increase The Risks of Most Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcome and May Be More Practical for Busy Clinics: Evidence From China

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted in order to investigate whether non-assisted hatching trophectoderm (TE) biopsy increases the risks of adverse perinatal outcomes in livebirths following elective single cryopreserved-thawed blastocyst transfer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 5,412 cycles from 4,908 women who achieved singleton livebirths between 2013 and 2019 were included in this retrospective cohort study. All embryos in this study were fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and cryopreserved through vitrification. The main intervention is to open the zona pellucida (ZP) of day 5/6 blastocyst immediately for biopsy without pre-assisted hatching. The main outcome measures are the common maternal and neonatal outcomes, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), abnormal placentation, abnormalities in umbilical cord and amniotic fluid, preterm birth, cesarean section, low birth weight, postpartum hemorrhage, and prolonged hospital stay (both mothers and infants). The generalized estimation equation (GEE) was used to control the effects of repeated measurements. The non-conditional logistic regression model was used to examine the associations between embryo biopsy status and each adverse perinatal event. Given that the selection bias and changes in learning curve might affect the results, we selected 1,086 similar (matching tolerance = 0.01) cycles from the ICSI group via propensity score matching (PSM) for second comparisons and adjustment (conditional logistic regression).

RESULTS

After adjusting for confounders, we confirmed that the non-assisted hatching protocol did not increase the risks of most adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Despite this, there were increased risks of GDM (aOR: 1.522, 95% CI: 1.141-2.031) and umbilical cord abnormalities (aOR: 11.539, 95% CI: 1.199-111.067) in the biopsy group. In the second comparisons after PSM, GDM incidence in the biopsy group was still higher (7.26% vs. 5.16%, P = 0.042), yet all measurement outcomes were equally likely to occur in both groups after the second adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

The non-assisted hatching TE biopsy does not increase the risks of most adverse perinatal outcomes. However, there is a higher GDM incidence in the biopsy group, and this association warrants further study. Considering its safety and simplicity, the non-assisted hatching protocol has the potential to become the preferred option for TE biopsy, especially in busy clinics and IVF laboratories.

Perinatal Outcomes of Singleton Live Births Following Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Structural Rearrangements in Single Frozen-Thawed Blastocyst Transfer Cycles: a Retrospective Cohort Study

This study investigated whether singleton pregnancies conceived after preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) are associated with a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes than singleton pregnancies conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). We collected data on singleton live births after PGT-SR (n = 107) and ICSI (n = 585) in our hospital from January 2017 to August 2020. Multivariable analyses were used to adjust for maternal age, body mass index, gravidity and parity, paternal age, ovulatory disorder, and recurrent spontaneous abortion. The unadjusted results showed a significantly higher risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) (odds ratio (OR) = 2.47; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10-5.54; P = 0.029) associated with PGT-SR singleton pregnancies than with ICSI singleton pregnancies. However, after adjusting for potential confounders, there were no longer any significant differences in the risk of HDP (adjusted OR = 2.24; 95% CI: 0.92-5.48; P = 0.077) between PGT-SR and ICSI singleton pregnancies. There were no significant differences between PGT-SR and ICSI singleton pregnancies in terms of gestational diabetes, preterm premature rupture of membranes, placenta previa, cesarean delivery, gestational age (weeks), preterm delivery (< 37 weeks), very preterm delivery (≥ 28 weeks and < 32 weeks), birth weight (g), low birth weight (< 2500 g), very low birth weight (< 1500 g), birth height (cm), birth defects, and 1-min and 5-min Apgar scores. In conclusion, for single frozen-thawed blastocyst cycles, there were no significant differences in adverse perinatal outcomes between PGT-SR and ICSI singleton pregnancies. However, due to the limited sample size, these conclusions need to be confirmed by further studies.

Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies resulting from preimplantation genetic testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) includes methods that allow embryos to be tested for severe inherited diseases or chromosomal abnormalities. In addition to IVF/ICSI and repeated freezing and thawing of the embryos, PGT requires a biopsy to obtain embryonic genetic material for analysis. However, the potential effects of PGT on obstetric and neonatal outcomes are currently uncertain.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

This study aimed to investigate whether pregnancies conceived after PGT were associated with a higher risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes compared with spontaneously conceived (SC) pregnancies or pregnancies conceived after IVF/ICSI.

SEARCH METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library entries from January 1990 to January 2021 were searched. The primary outcomes in this study were low birth weight (LBW) and congenital malformations (CMs), and the secondary outcomes included gestational age, preterm delivery (PTD), very preterm delivery (VPTD), birth weight (BW), very low birth weight (VLBW), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), gestational diabetes, placenta previa and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PROM). We further pooled the results of PGT singleton pregnancies. Subgroup analyses included preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), preimplantation genetic screening (PGS), cleavage-stage biopsy combined with fresh embryo transfer (CB-ET) and blastocyst biopsy combined with frozen-thawed embryo transfer (BB-FET).

OUTCOMES

This meta-analysis included 15 studies involving 3682 babies born from PGT pregnancies, 127 719 babies born from IVF/ICSI pregnancies and 915 222 babies born from SC pregnancies. The relative risk (RR) of LBW was higher in PGT pregnancies compared with SC pregnancies (RR = 3.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.32-6.72), but the risk of CMs was not different between the two groups. The pooled results for the risks of LBW and CMs were similar in PGT and IVF/ICSI pregnancies. The risks of PTD (RR = 3.12, 95% CI: 2.67-3.64) and HDP (RR = 3.12, 95% CI: 2.18-4.47) were significantly higher in PGT pregnancies compared with SC pregnancies. Lower gestational age (mean difference [MD] = -0.76 weeks, 95% CI -1.17 to -0.34) and BW (MD = -163.80 g, 95% CI: -299.35 to -28.24) were also noted for PGT pregnancies compared with SC pregnancies. Nevertheless, compared with IVF/ICSI pregnancies, the risks of VPTD and VLBW in PGT pregnancies were significantly decreased by 41% and 30%, respectively, although the risk of HDP was still significantly increased by 50% in PGT pregnancies compared with IVF/ICSI pregnancies. The combined results of obstetric and neonatal outcomes of PGT and IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies were consistent with the overall results. Further subgroup analyses indicated that both PGD and PGS pregnancies were associated with a higher risk of PTD and a lower gestational age compared with SC pregnancies.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

This meta-analysis showed that PGT pregnancies may be associated with increased risks of LBW, PTD and HDP compared with SC pregnancies. The overall obstetric and neonatal outcomes of PGT pregnancies are favourable compared with those of IVF/ICSI pregnancies, although PGT pregnancies were associated with a higher risk of HDP. However, because the number of studies that could be included was limited, more randomised controlled trials and prospective cohort studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.

Utility of polygenic embryo screening for disease depends on the selection strategy

Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have been offered since 2019 to screen in vitro fertilization embryos for genetic liability to adult diseases, despite a lack of comprehensive modeling of expected outcomes. Here we predict, based on the liability threshold model, the expected reduction in complex disease risk following polygenic embryo screening for a single disease. A strong determinant of the potential utility of such screening is the selection strategy, a factor that has not been previously studied. When only embryos with a very high PRS are excluded, the achieved risk reduction is minimal. In contrast, selecting the embryo with the lowest PRS can lead to substantial relative risk reductions, given a sufficient number of viable embryos. We systematically examine the impact of several factors on the utility of screening, including: variance explained by the PRS, number of embryos, disease prevalence, parental PRSs, and parental disease status. We consider both relative and absolute risk reductions, as well as population-averaged and per-couple risk reductions, and also examine the risk of pleiotropic effects. Finally, we confirm our theoretical predictions by simulating 'virtual' couples and offspring based on real genomes from schizophrenia and Crohn's disease case-control studies. We discuss the assumptions and limitations of our model, as well as the potential emerging ethical concerns.

The impact of estradiol on pregnancy outcomes in letrozole-stimulated frozen embryo transfer cycles

Objective

To assess the impact of low estradiol (E2) levels in letrozole-stimulated frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

Design

Retrospective cohort.

Setting

University-affiliated fertility center.

Patients

All patients who underwent letrozole-stimulated FET cycles from January 2017 to April 2020 (n = 217). The "Low E2" group was defined as those with E2 serum levels on the day of trigger <10th percentile level (E2 <91.16 pg/mL, n = 22) and the "Normal E2" group was defined as those with E2 serum levels ≥10th percentile level (E2 ≥91.16 pg/mL, n = 195).

Interventions

None.

Main Outcome Measures

Pregnancy outcomes including rates of clinical pregnancy, clinical miscarriage, and live birth. Neonatal outcomes including gestational age at delivery, birth weight, and Apgar score.

Results

The mean ± SD estradiol level was 66.8 ± 14.8 pg/mL for the "Low E2" group compared with 366.3 ± 322.1 pg/mL for the "Normal E2" group. There were otherwise no substantial differences in cycle characteristics such as endometrial thickness on the day of ovulation trigger and progesterone levels in early pregnancy. The "Low E2" group had a significantly higher clinical miscarriage rate (36.4% vs. 8.8%, adjusted odds ratio 8.06) and lower live birth rate (31.8% vs. 57.9%, adjusted odds ratio 0.28). Neonatal outcomes such as gestational age at delivery, mean birth weight, Apgar scores, and incidence of newborn complications were not clinically different between the groups.

Conclusion

Low E2 levels were associated with a significantly higher miscarriage rate and lower live birth rate, suggesting that E2 levels in the follicular phase may have an effect on cycle outcomes. Given the rise in use of FET, further studies are needed to confirm our findings and understand the mechanisms.

Embryo biopsy and maternal and neonatal outcomes following cryopreserved-thawed single embryo transfer

BACKGROUND

Contemporary embryo biopsy in the United States involves the removal of several cells from a blastocyst that would become the placenta for preimplantation genetic testing. Embryos are then cryopreserved while patients await biopsy results, with transfers occurring in a subsequent cycle as a single frozen-thawed embryo transfer, if euploid.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine if removal of these cells for preimplantation genetic testing was associated with adverse obstetrical or neonatal outcomes after frozen-thawed single embryo transfer.

STUDY DESIGN

We linked assisted reproductive technology surveillance data from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System to birth certificates and maternal and neonatal hospitalization discharge diagnoses in Massachusetts from 2014 to 2017, considering only singleton births after frozen-thawed single embryo transfers. We compared outcomes of cycles having embryo biopsy (n=585) to those having no biopsy (n=2191) using chi-square for categorical and binary variables and logistic regression for adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, adjusting for mother's age, race, education, parity, body mass index, birth year, insurance, and all infertility diagnoses.

RESULTS

Considering no biopsy as the reference, there was no difference between groups with respect to preeclampsia (adjusted odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-1.61; P=.5685); pregnancy-induced hypertension (adjusted odds ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-1.59; P=.6146); placental disorders, including placental abruption, placenta previa, placenta accreta, placenta increta, and placenta percreta (adjusted odds ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-2.24; P=.6675); preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval 0.73-2.03; P=.4418); low birthweight (adjusted odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-2.15; P=.7355); cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.38; P=.7762); or gestational diabetes mellitus (adjusted odds ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-1.38; P=.4734). In addition, there was no difference between the groups for prolonged hospital stay for mothers (adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.80; P=.3014) or for infants (95% confidence interval, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-2.29; P=.3923).

CONCLUSION

Embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing does not increase the odds for diagnoses related to placentation (preeclampsia, pregnancy-related hypertension, placental disorders, preterm delivery, or low birthweight), maternal conditions (gestational diabetes mellitus), or maternal or infant length of stay after delivery.

Impact of preimplantation genetic testing on obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) increases the risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S)

Pregnancies achieved after PGT or in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

INTERVENTION(S)

Systematic search of databases until December 2020 with cross-checking of references from relevant articles in English.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after PGT and IVF/ICSI, including mean birth weight, low birth weight, very low birth weight (VLBW), mean gestational age at birth, preterm birth, very preterm birth, birth defects, intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), sex ratio, cesarean section, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, placenta disorder (placenta previa, placenta abruption, placenta accreta), and preterm premature rupture of membranes.

RESULT(S)

Ultimately, a total of 785,445 participants were enrolled in this meta-analysis, and these participants were divided into a PGT group (n = 54,294) and an IVF/ICSI group (n = 731,151). The PGT pregnancies had lower rates of low birth weight (risk ratio [RR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75 to 0.98), VLBW (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.81), and very preterm births (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.70) than those of IVF/ICSI pregnancies. However, the PGT group had a higher rate of the obstetric outcome of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.57). The PGT did not increase the risk of other adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes, such as those associated with mean birth weight, mean gestational age at birth, birth defects, IUGR, sex ratio, cesarean section, gestational diabetes mellitus, placental disorder (placenta previa, placenta abruption, placenta accreta), or preterm premature rupture of membranes. We performed subgroup analysis with only blastocyst biopsies and found that PGT with blastocyst biopsies was associated with a lower rate of VLBW (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.95). The PGT with blastocyst biopsies did not increase the risk of other adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Additionally, we performed subgroup analysis with only frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles, and we found that PGT pregnancies were associated with a lower rate of VLBW (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.97), a lower rate of cesarean birth (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99), a higher rate of preterm birth (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.18), and a higher rate of IUGR (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.38) than those of IVF/ICSI pregnancies. The PGT with frozen-thawed embryo transfer did not increase the risk of other adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION(S)

The pooled analysis suggested that PGT did not increase the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes. The association between PGT and a higher risk of IUGR requires further investigation.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes following blastocyst biopsy for PGT in single vitrified-warmed embryo transfer cycles

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does blastocyst biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) increase the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of 5097 single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles from January 2016 to December 2018, with 2061 cycles in the biopsied group and 3036 cycles in the unbiopsied group enrolled in the analyses. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The live birth rate in the biopsied group (41.1%) was significantly higher than that in the unbiopsied group (35.6%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.54, P = 0.012) after adjusting for maternal age, maternal body mass index, gravidity, parity, infertility diagnosis, timing of blastocyst transfer, blastocyst quality, regimen of endometrial preparation, endometrial thickness before transfer and treatment year. The rates of total pregnancy loss (25.4% versus 32.2%, aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52-0.91, P = 0.008) and early miscarriage (12.1% versus 17.3%, aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.83, P = 0.004) were significantly lower in the biopsied group than in the unbiopsied group. No significant differences were found in sex ratio or the risks of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, diabetes in pregnancy, placenta previa, preterm premature rupture of membranes, low birthweight, very low birthweight, macrosomia, small for gestational age, large for gestational age or birth defects between the two groups. When the subgroup analyses were conducted based on different types of PGT, similar patterns were found for all types.

CONCLUSION

Blastocyst biopsy might not increase the risks of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in the short term.

Reduction in multiple pregnancy rate in donor oocyte-recipient gestational carrier (GC) in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in the USA with single-embryo transfer and preimplantation genetic testing

PURPOSE

To evaluate the utilization of single-embryo transfer (SET) and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in gestational carrier IVF cycles in the USA with donor oocyte and examine the impact on live birth and multiple gestation.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study using the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) clinic database of 4776 donor oocyte-recipient IVF cycles in which a GC was used. The cycles were separated into 4 groups by use of PGT and number of embryos transferred as follows: (1) PGT and single-embryo transfer (PGT-SET); (2) PGT and multiple embryo transfer (PGT-MET); (3) no PGT and SET (NoPGT-SET); (4) no PGT and MET (NoPGT-MET). Primary outcomes were live birth rate (LBR) and multiple pregnancy rate (MPR).

RESULTS

More than one blastocyst was transferred in 48.7% (2323/4774) of the cycles. When ≥1 blastocyst was transferred, with or without the use of PGT, the MPR was 45.5% and 42.0%, respectively. In comparison, in the PGT-SET and NoPGT-SET groups, the MPR was 1.4% (8/579) and 3.3% (29/883), respectively. Live birth rates increased with the use of PGT-A and with MET.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that SET, with or without PGT, is associated with a significantly reduced MPR in donor oocyte-recipient GC IVF cycles while maintaining high LBR. It also demonstrates that many infertility centers in the USA are not adhering to ASRM embryo transfer guidelines. Our findings highlight an opportunity to increase GC safety, which ultimately may lead to widened access to this increasingly restricted service outside the USA.