Review of human oocyte cryopreservation in ART programs: Current challenges and opportunities

Oocyte cryopreservation has notably increased in recent times, to become an essential part of clinical infertility treatment. Since the 1980s, many improvements in oocyte cryopreservation (OC) have been adopted, including the great advance with the application of vitrification. The commonly used vitrification protocol applies different cryoprotectants (Ethylene glycol and/or DMSO and/or PROH and sucrose and/or Trehalose) and two different steps: firstly, exposure in equilibration solution for 5-15 min, followed by a vitrification solution for 60-90 s at room temperature. The warming method includes a first step for 1 min at 37 °C and 3 subsequent steps at room temperature to remove the cryoprotectant for a total of 9-12 min. In addition, biosafety is a critical aspect to mention, and it is related to devices used during the vitrification, mainly in terms of whether the biological vitrified material comes in direct contact with liquid nitrogen (open vitrification) or not (closed vitrification), where LN2 may contain potentially contaminating viruses or pathogens. Furthermore, during early development major waves of epigenetic reprogramming take place. Recent literature suggests that epigenetic and transcriptomic profiles are sensitive to the stress induced by vitrification, including osmotic shock, temperature, rapid changes of pH and toxicity of cryoprotectants. It is, therefore, important to better understand the potential perturbations of epigenetic modifications that may be associated with the globally used vitrification methods. Therefore, we here discuss the benefits and efficiency of human oocyte vitrification; we also review the evidence surrounding oocyte cryopreservation-related epigenetic modifications and potential epigenetic dysregulations, together with long-term consequences for offspring health.

Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation in assisted reproductive technology: past achievements and current challenges

Cryopreservation has revolutionized the treatment of infertility and fertility preservation. This review summarizes the milestones that paved the way to the current routinary clinical implementation of this game-changing practice in assisted reproductive technology. Still, evidence to support "the best practice" in cryopreservation is controversial and several protocol adaptations exist that were described and compared here, such as cumulus-intact vs. cumulus-free oocyte cryopreservation, artificial collapse, assisted hatching, closed vs. open carriers, and others. A last matter of concern is whether cryostorage duration may impact oocyte/embryo competence, but the current body of evidence in this regard is reassuring. From social and clinical perspectives, oocyte and embryo cryopreservation has evolved from an afterthought when assisted reproduction was intended for immediate pregnancy with supernumerary embryos of secondary interest to its current purpose, which primarily is to preserve fertility long-term and more comprehensively allow for family planning. However, the initial consenting process, which still is geared to short-term fertility care, may no longer be relevant when the individuals that initially preserved the tissues have completed their reproductive journey. A more encompassing counseling model is required to address changing patient values over time.

Comparison of the effect of two commercialized vitrification carriers on pregnancy outcomes in freeze-thaw cycles

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the effects of two brands of commercial vitrification carriers on pregnancy outcomes in freeze-thaw cycles.

METHODS

We included 4871 patients who underwent a "freeze all" strategy using the commercial carriers J.Y. straw and OYASHIPS straw in the Reproductive Center of the First Hospital of Jilin University. The pregnancy outcomes of cleavage-stage embryos and blastocysts were studied separately. Detailed data and the safety of children born from mothers with the two types of carriers were also compared.

RESULTS

Patients who used J.Y. straw had similar clinical pregnancy and live birth rates with one and two cleavage-stage embryo transplantation to those who used OYASHIPS straw. In patients who had blastocyst transplantation, the clinical pregnancy rate of one blastocyst transplanted in those who used OYASHIPS straw was significantly higher than that in those who used J.Y. straw (57.85% vs 47.09%). Among children born from mothers who used J.Y. straw, the congenital disability rate was significantly higher than that in those with OYASHIPS straw.

CONCLUSION

The OYASHIPS straw carrier is cheap and can achieve clinical pregnancy and live birth outcomes comparable to those of J.Y. straw. Therefore, OYASHIPS straw is a good alternative option.

Fertility Preservation as an Option for Women with Genetic Disorders: Insights from a SWOT Analysis on Elective Oocyte Freezing and Preimplantation Genetic Testing

This paper uses a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis to overview the option of fertility preservation in women with genetic diseases, who would later use preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders, in order to not transmit their condition. Strengths associated with elective oocyte freezing are ethical considerations, overall maternal and fetal safety, and effectiveness, if performed at <35 years of age. Weaknesses are related to costs and rare but present (<1-3%) risks of maternal complications. Counselling on fertility management aimed at preventing infertility offers a valuable opportunity, the same as it has been in oncological patients' care. The potentially high percentage of women with genetic conditions who would return to use their frozen oocytes also represents an opportunity together with the minimization of the need for egg donation, which has higher obstetrical risks compared to the use of autologous oocytes. Finally, a threat is represented by the potential psychological distress to young women who could never attempt to become pregnant through preimplantation genetic testing, or do it before any decline in their fertility. Potential unknown future long-term health risks for children conceived after egg vitrification/thawing are also a threat, but current knowledge is reassuring. Altogether, early counselling on the option of fertility preservation should thus be incorporated into standard care of all patients with any genetic condition.

The impact of embryo vitrification on placental histopathology features and perinatal outcome in singleton live births

STUDY QUESTION

Does embryo vitrification affect placental histopathology pattern and perinatal outcome in singleton live births?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Embryo vitrification has a significant effect on the placental histopathology pattern and is associated with a higher prevalence of dysfunctional labor.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Obstetrical and perinatal outcomes differ between live births resulting from fresh and frozen embryo transfers. The effect of embryo vitrification on the placental histopathology features associated with the development of perinatal complications remains unclear.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Retrospective cohort study evaluating data of all live births from one academic tertiary hospital resulting from IVF treatment with autologous oocytes during the period from 2009 to 2017.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

All patients had placentas sent for pathological evaluation irrelevant of maternal or fetal complications status. Placental, obstetric and perinatal outcomes of pregnancies resulting from hormone replacement vitrified embryo transfers were compared with those after fresh embryo transfers. A multivariate analysis was conducted to adjust the results for determinants potentially associated with the development of placental histopathology abnormalities.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A total of 1014 singleton live births were included in the final analysis and were allocated to the group of pregnancies resulting from fresh (n = 660) and hormone replacement frozen (n = 354) embryo transfers. After the adjustment for confounding factors the frozen embryo transfers were found to be significantly associated with chorioamnionitis with maternal (odds ratio (OR) 2.0; 95% CI 1.2-3.3) and fetal response (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.2-5.7), fetal vascular malperfusion (OR 3.9; 95% CI 1.4-9.2), furcate cord insertion (OR 2.3 95% CI 1.2-5.3), villitis of unknown etiology (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.1-4.2), intervillous thrombi (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.3-3.7), subchorionic thrombi (OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.6-7.0), as well as with failure of labor progress (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.5-4.2).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Since the live births resulted from frozen-thawed embryos included treatment cycles with previously failed embryo transfers, the factors over embryo vitrification may affect implantation and placental histopathology.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The study results contribute to the understanding of the perinatal future of fresh and vitrified embryos. Our findings may have an implication for the clinical decision to perform fresh or frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

Authors have not received any funding to support this study. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

First live birth after fertility preservation using vitrification of oocytes in a woman with mosaic Turner syndrome

PURPOSE

To report the case of a young woman diagnosed with Turner syndrome (TS) who achieved a live birth using her own oocytes that had been vitrified for fertility preservation.

METHODS

A 25-year-old woman with mosaic (45,X/46,XX) TS was referred for fertility preservation (FP) counseling. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level was normal (6.4 µg/L). In view of the unpredictable rate of follicle loss in TS individuals, she requested FP and underwent two cycles of ovarian stimulation (OS) for oocyte cryopreservation (OoC) using a GnRH antagonist protocol and recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH), 200-250 IU daily for 8 resp. 12 days.

RESULTS

In total, 29 metaphase II oocytes (MII) were vitrified after OS. After conceiving spontaneously and achieving a live birth, she returned to the clinic five years after OoC with a desire for pregnancy using in vitro fertilization (IVF) of her cryopreserved oocytes and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT-A). All 29 MII oocytes were thawed; 23 oocytes survived (79.3%) and were inseminated with partner sperm using intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Thirteen oocytes were fertilized resulting in three good quality blastocysts which were vitrified after trophectoderm biopsy for PGT-A using array-CGH. Two blastocysts were found to be euploid. One was thawed and transferred to the uterus using a HRT priming protocol. An uneventful pregnancy occurred. The patient delivered a healthy baby girl weighing 3490 g at 40 weeks of gestation.

CONCLUSIONS

We report the first live birth achieved using cryopreserved oocytes in a woman diagnosed with mosaic TS. Cryopreservation of oocytes after ovarian stimulation is a realistic option for FP in selected post menarche individuals with mosaic TS. Whether PGT-A may reduce the risk of pregnancy loss in TS has to be confirmed by further studies.

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Europe: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Studies

Background

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is defined as the type of hyperglycemia diagnosed for the first-time during pregnancy, presenting with intermediate glucose levels between normal levels for pregnancy and glucose levels diagnostic of diabetes in the non-pregnant state. We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze studies of prevalence of GDM in European countries at regional and sub-regional levels, according to age, trimester, body weight, and GDM diagnostic criteria.

Methods

Systematic search was conducted in five databases to retrieve studies from 2014 to 2019 reporting the prevalence of GDM in Europe. Two authors have independently screened titles and abstracts and full text according to eligibility using Covidence software. A random-effects model was used to quantify weighted GDM prevalence estimates. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute criteria was used to assess the risk of bias.

Results

From the searched databases, 133 research reports were deemed eligible and included in the meta-analysis. The research reports yielded 254 GDM-prevalence studies that tested 15,572,847 pregnant women between 2014 and 2019. The 133 research reports were from 24 countries in Northern Europe (44.4%), Southern Europe (27.1%), Western Europe (24.1%), and Eastern Europe (4.5%). The overall weighted GDM prevalence in the 24 European countries was estimated at 10.9% (95% CI: 10.0-11.8, I2 : 100%). The weighted GDM prevalence was highest in the Eastern Europe (31.5%, 95% CI: 19.8-44.6, I2 : 98.9%), followed by in Southern Europe (12.3%, 95% CI: 10.9-13.9, I2 : 99.6%), Western Europe (10.7%, 95% CI: 9.5-12.0, I2 : 99.9%), and Northern Europe (8.9%, 95% CI: 7.9-10.0, I2 : 100). GDM prevalence was 2.14-fold increased in pregnant women with maternal age ≥30 years (versus 15-29 years old), 1.47-fold if the diagnosis was made in the third trimester (versus second trimester), and 6.79- fold in obese and 2.29-fold in overweight women (versus normal weight).

Conclusions

In Europe, GDM is significant in pregnant women, around 11%, with the highest prevalence in pregnant women of Eastern European countries (31.5%). Findings have implications to guide vigilant public health awareness campaigns about the risk factors associated with developing GDM.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/], identifier CRD42020161857.

An Eight Year Experience of Autologous Oocyte Vitrification for Infertile Patients Owing to Unavailability of Sperm on Oocyte Retrieval Day

Objective: The objective of this study was to provide a descriptive analysis of the clinical outcomes achieved in oocyte vitrification in cases where sperm was unavailable on oocyte retrieval day, and to identify predictors of oocyte survival. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from a university-affiliated reproductive medical center. There were 321 cycles in which some of, or all oocytes were vitrified owing to the unavailability of sperm between March 2009 and October 2017. A descriptive analysis of the clinical outcomes including both fresh embryo transfers and cryopreserved embryo transfers was provided. The ability of an individual parameter to forecast oocyte survival per thawing cycle was assessed by binary logistic regression analysis. The cumulative probability of live birth (CPLB) was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method according to the total number of oocytes thawed in consecutive procedures. Results: The average survival rate was 83.13%. High-quality embryo rate and blastocyst rate decreased significantly decreased significantly in vitrification oocyte group compared to fresh control oocytes. The comparison of sibling oocytes in part-oocyte-vitrified cycles shows fewer high-quality embryos developed in the vitrified group. The live birth rate per warmed-oocyte was 4.3%. Reasons for lack of sperm availability on oocyte retrieval day and serum cholesterol levels were found to be associated with oocyte survival rate in the present study. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in CPLB between patients ≤35 vs. >35 years. Conclusions: Oocyte vitrification is an indispensable and effective alternative when sperm are not available on oocyte retrieval day. The present study provided evidence that oocytes from infertile couples were more likely to suffer oocyte/embryo vitrification injury. Clinicians need to take this into account when advising patients in similar situations. Further studies will be necessary to clarify the correlation between serum metabolism parameters and human oocyte survival after vitrification.

The influence of oxygen concentration during embryo culture on obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

STUDY QUESTION

Does oxygen concentration during 3-day embryo culture affect obstetric and neonatal outcomes?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Oxygen concentration during 3-day embryo culture does not seem to affect the obstetric and neonatal outcomes measured.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Atmospheric oxygen appears to be harmful during extended embryo culture. Embryo culture conditions might therefore be a potential risk factor for subsequent fetal development and the health of future children. No data are available concerning the obstetrics and neonatal outcomes after Day 3 transfer of embryos cultured under reduced and atmospheric oxygen tensions.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A secondary analysis of a previous randomized controlled trial assessing clinical pregnancy outcomes was carried out. This analysis included 1125 consecutive oocyte donation cycles utilizing ICSI or IVF and Day 3 embryo transfers between November 2009 and April 2012. The whole cohort of donated oocytes from patients who agreed to participate in the study were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to a reduced O2 tension group (6% O2) or an air-exposed group (20% O2) based on a computer-generated randomization list. Fresh and vitrified oocytes were used for oocyte donation. Only those pregnancies with a live birth at or beyond 24 weeks of gestation were included.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Day 3 embryos were cultured in an atmosphere of 5.5% CO2, 6% O2, 88.5% N2 versus a dual gas system in air.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

From the eligible 1125 cycles, 564 were allocated to the 6% O2 group and 561 cycles to the 20% O2 group. However, 50 and 62 cycles did not reach embryo transfer in the 6% and 20% O2 groups, respectively. No differences were found between 6% O2 and atmospheric O2 tension in the number of livebirths per embryo transfer (mean ± SD, 0.5 ± 0.7 versus 0.5 ± 0.7), pregnancy complications or neonatal outcomes. Both groups (6% and atmospheric O2) had similar single and twin delivery rates (40.8% versus 38.1% and 10.7% versus 12.3%, respectively). Preterm delivery rates and very preterm delivery rates (10.80% versus 13.24% and 1.25% versus 2.94%, respectively), birthweight (3229 ± 561 g versus 3154 ± 731 g), low birthweight (2.92% versus 2.45%), birth height (50.18 ± 2.41 cm versus 49.7 ± 3.59 cm), head circumference (34.16 ± 1.87 cm versus 33.09 ± 1.85 cm) and 1 min Apgar scores (8.96 ± 0.87 versus 8.89 ± 0.96) were also similar between 6% and atmospheric O2 groups, respectively.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The number of liveborns finally analyzed is still small and not all obstetric and neonatal variables could be evaluated. Furthermore, a small proportion of the obstetric and neonatal data was obtained through a questionnaire filled out by the patients themselves. One reason for the lack of effect of oxygen concentration on pregnancy outcome could be the absence of trophectoderm cells at cleavage stage, which may make Day 3 embryos less susceptible to hypoxic conditions.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Nowadays many IVF laboratories use a more physiological oxygen concentration for embryo culture. However, the benefits of using low oxygen concentration on both laboratory and clinical outcomes during embryo culture are still under debate. Furthermore, long-term studies investigating the effect of using atmospheric O2 are also needed. Gathering these type of clinical data is indeed, quite relevant from the safety perspective. The present data show that, at least in egg donation cycles undergoing Day 3 embryo transfers, culturing embryos under atmospheric oxygen concentration seems not to affect perinatal outcomes.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The present project was supported by the R + D program of the Regional Valencian Government, Spain (IMPIVA IMDTF/2011/214). The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with respect to the content of this manuscript.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01532193.

Endometrial Receptivity Analysis (ERA): data versus opinions

This article summarises and contextualises the accumulated basic and clinical data on the ERA test and addresses specific comments and opinions presented by the opponent as part of an invited debate. Progress in medicine depends on new technologies and concepts that translate to practice to solve long-standing problems. In a key example, combining RNA sequencing data (transcriptomics) with artificial intelligence (AI) led to a clinical revolution in personalising disease diagnosis and fostered the concept of precision medicine. The reproductive field is no exception. Translation of endometrial transcriptomics to the clinic yielded an objective definition of the limited time period during which the maternal endometrium is receptive to an embryo, known as the window of implantation (WOI). The WOI is induced by the presence of exogenous and/or endogenous progesterone (P) after proper oestradiol (E2) priming. The window lasts 30-36 hours and, depending on the patient, occurs between LH + 6 and LH + 9 in natural cycles or between P + 4 and P + 7 in hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) cycles. In approximately 30% of IVF cycles in which embryo transfer is performed blindly, the WOI is displaced and embryo-endometrial synchrony is not achieved. Extending this application of endometrial transcriptomics, the endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) test couples next-generation sequencing (NGS) to a computational predictor to identify transcriptomic signatures for each endometrial stage: proliferative (PRO), pre-receptive (PRE), receptive (R) and post-receptive (POST). In this way, personalised embryo transfer (pET) may be possible by synchronising embryo transfer with each patient's WOI. Data are the only way to confront arguments sustained in opinions and/or misleading concepts; it is up to the reader to make their own conclusions regarding its clinical utility.

Health of 2-year-old children born after vitrified oocyte donation in comparison with peers born after fresh oocyte donation

STUDY QUESTION

Does oocyte vitrification adversely affect the health of 2-year-old children compared with peers born after use of fresh oocytes in a donation programme?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The growth and health of 2-year-old children born after oocyte vitrification are similar to those of peers born after use of fresh oocytes.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Although oocyte vitrification is a well-established procedure in ART, the evidence on its safety for offspring is limited. Currently, no disadvantageous effects of oocyte vitrification have been shown in terms of obstetric and neonatal outcome. However, no data beyond the neonatal period are available to date.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A combined retrospective and prospective observational study was performed in a tertiary reproductive centre. The retrospective data were available in our extensive database of children born after ART. Donor cycles with an oocyte retrieval between January 2010 and March 2017 and a fresh embryo transfer resulting in the livebirth of a singleton were selected from the established oocyte donation programme. Fresh or vitrified oocytes were used in the donor cycles and all pregnancies in oocyte recipients were achieved after ICSI. Only children residing in Belgium were eligible for follow-up.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Biometric and health parameters of 72 children born after oocyte vitrification were compared with those of 41 children born after use of a fresh oocyte. Data were collected by means of questionnaires and physical examinations at the age of 21–30 months. The primary outcome measures were anthropometry and health at 2 years of age.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Length, weight, BMI, head circumference, left arm circumference and waist circumference at the age of 2 years were comparable between the vitrification and fresh group, also after adjustment for treatment, and maternal and neonatal characteristics (all P > 0.05). Health of the children in terms of hospital admission and surgical intervention rates were comparable between the vitrification and fresh group (both P > 0.05).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Although the current study is the largest series describing health parameters beyond the neonatal period, the small numbers still preclude definite conclusions.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This study provides the first evidence indicating that oocyte vitrification does not adversely affect the growth and health of offspring beyond the neonatal period.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was supported by Methusalem grants and by grants from Wetenschappelijk Fonds Willy Gepts, all issued by the Vrije Universiteit Brussel. All co-authors declared no conflict of interest in relation to this work. Both the Centre for Reproductive Medicine and the Centre for Medical Genetics from the UZ Brussel have received several educational grants from IBSA, Ferring, MSD and Merck for either research on oocyte vitrification or for establishing the database for follow-up research and organizing the data collection.

Comparison of two different oocyte vitrification methods: a prospective, paired study on the same genetic background and stimulation protocol

STUDY QUESTION

Can two different methods for oocyte vitrification, one using an open tool and the other a closed tool, result in similar oocyte survival rates?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The oocyte survival rate was found to be higher in the closed method.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Open vitrification is performed routinely in oocyte donation cycles. Closed oocyte vitrification may result in slower cooling rates and thus it is less used, even though it has been recommended in order to avoid the risk of cross-contamination between material from different patients.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This is a prospective cohort study with sibling oocytes carried out in a fertility center between July 2014 and January 2016. The study included 83 oocyte donors each providing a minimum of 12 mature oocytes (metaphase II: MII) at oocyte retrieval. Oocyte survival rate and fertilization rate, as well as reproductive outcomes (biochemical, clinical, ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates) per embryo transfer and also cumulatively between the two methods were compared by Chi2 tests.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Donor oocytes were denuded and six MII oocytes from each donor were vitrified using an open method and later assigned to one recipient, while another six MII oocytes were vitrified using a closed method and assigned to a different recipient (paired analysis). ICSI was used in all cases and embryo transfer was performed on Day 2-3 in all cases.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Oocyte donors were 24.8 years old on average (SD 4.7). Recipient age (average 41.2 years, SD 4.7) and BMI (mean 23.8 kg/m2, SD 4.0) were similar between recipient groups. Oocytes vitrified using the closed method had higher survival rate (94.5% versus 88.9%, P = 0.002), but lower fertilization rate (57.1% versus 69.8%, P < 0.001) compared to the open method. The number of fresh embryos transferred in the two groups was 1.8 on average (SD 0.4). Biochemical (45% closed versus 50% open), clinical (40% versus 50%) and ongoing (37.5% versus 42.5%) pregnancy rates were not different between groups (P > 0.05) and neither were live birth rates (37.5% versus 42.5%, P > 0.05). Cumulative reproductive results (obtained after the transfer of all the embryos) were also similar between groups.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The participants of this study were oocyte donors, i.e. young women in good health, and care should be exerted in extending our results to other populations such as infertility patients, oncofertility patients and women freezing oocytes to delay childbearing.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our results suggest that, in spite of different survival and fertilization rates, closed and open oocyte vitrification methods should offer similar reproductive outcomes up to cumulative live birth rates.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The authors report no conflict of interest. Vitrolife provided the media and the closed method tool needed for the study at no cost.

Anti-Müllerian hormone is an independent marker for oocyte survival after vitrification

RESEARCH QUESTION

This study explored the relationship between anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and oocyte survival after vitrification. The association between AMH and blastocyst formation after oocyte vitrification was also assessed.

DESIGN

A retrospective observational analysis was performed in a private IVF centre. A total of 4507 metaphase-II warmed oocytes were included from 450 couples, predominantly of Arab ethnicity. Between August 2015 and August 2018, couples underwent 484 intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments using vitrified-warmed oocytes.

RESULTS

Patients' median age ± SD was 36.2 ± 6.1 years, AMH concentration 2.6 ± 3.4 ng/ml and body mass index (BMI) 26.5 ± 4.6 kg/m². The oocyte survival rate after vitrification was 87.37 ± 20.42%. AMH concentration showed a significant correlation (Kendall's tau 0.087, P = 0.0079) with oocyte survival rate independent of oocyte yield. Correlation was significant (odds ratio 1.041, 95% confidence interval 1.007-1.077, P = 0.018) when a multivariant model was applied that included AMH, age and BMI. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed an AMH cut-off value of 1.09 ng/ml that could obtain at least a 70% survival rate, with an area under the curve of 0.669. Regarding embryo development in ICSI cycles including fresh and warmed oocytes for the same patient, blastocyst formation rate was higher in fresh compared with warmed oocytes (P < 0.001). In this subgroup no significant correlation was seen between fertilization or blastocyst rate and AMH concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

AMH concentration showed a significant correlation with oocyte survival. Blastocyst formation was significantly lower after oocyte vitrification, but no correlation was found with AMH. Clinicians should carefully evaluate oocyte vitrification for patients with AMH below 1.09 ng/ml and consider embryo accumulation for these patients in preference to oocyte accumulation.

Human sperm vitrification: the state of the art

Sperm cryopreservation has been widely used in assisted reproductive technology (ART) and has resulted in millions of live births. Two principal approaches have been adopted: conventional (slow) freezing and vitrification. As a traditional technique, slow freezing has been successfully employed and widely used at ART clinics whereas the latter, a process to solidify liquid into an amorphous or glassy state, may become a faster alternative method of sperm cryopreservation with significant benefits in regard to simple equipment and applicability to fertility centers. Sperm vitrification has its own limitations. Firstly, small volume of load is usually plunged to liquid nitrogen to achieve high cooling rate, which makes large volume sample cryopreservation less feasible. Secondly, direct contact with liquid nitrogen increases the potential risk of contamination. Recently, new carriers have been developed to facilitate improved control over the volume and speed, and new strategies have been implemented to minimize the contamination risk. In summary, although sperm vitrification has not yet been applied in routine sperm cryopreservation, its potential as a standard procedure is growing.

A follow-up survey on the reproductive intentions and experiences of women undergoing planned oocyte cryopreservation

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the current reproductive attitudes and experiences of women who have previously undergone planned oocyte cryopreservation (OoC)?

DESIGN

Retrospective questionnaire-based cohort study involving women who had previously undergone planned OoC between January 2009 and September 2016 at a single centre. Eligible women were contacted via e-mail and invited to complete an anonymous standardized questionnaire that had been developed to evaluate their current relationship status and reproductive situation, their attitudes towards planned OoC and their future reproductive intentions.

RESULTS

Of 460 women who had completed at least one OoC cycle, questionnaires were obtained from 138 women. After a mean (± SD) follow-up of 4.5 ± 2.4 years, two-thirds of respondents (65%) anticipated using their oocytes at some point in the future. The respondents reported an overwhelmingly positive attitude towards planned OoC, with 98% indicating they would recommend this intervention to others. Overall, 83% of respondents were single at the time they requested OoC but only 44% were single at the time they completed the survey. While 43/62 (69%) of women became pregnant after undergoing OoC, the majority 30/43 (70%) of these pregnancies were achieved without using their vitrified oocytes. Finally, 13/28 (46%) who used their cryopreserved oocytes stated that they had achieved a live birth.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of women who undergo OoC do not regret their experience and many have found a partner in subsequent years. Twenty-one per cent of respondents who attempted to conceive after OoC had a live birth using their cryopreserved oocytes.

The dilemma of social oocyte freezing: usage rate is too low to make it cost-effective

Delayed childbearing in affluent countries and the financial crisis of the Y-generation have contributed to the dramatic decline in birth rate. Social oocyte freezing (SOF) has fuelled the imagination of patients and doctors to offer it as a solution to single, presumably fertile, women to preserve their fertility potential by egg banking at an early age. Some are calling on governments to support large-scale 'fertility preservation', but is it cost-effective? Social oocyte freezing is effectively expensive insurance, where future utilization is unknown. Theoretical studies have suggested that SOF is only cost-effective with a usage rate of 50% or over, and when getting married is not set as a condition. Maximal possible utilization of frozen eggs, however, is much lower. Recent studies have found usage rates of 3.1-9.3%, which sets the cost of each extra live birth between $600,000 and 1,000,000. As IVF is being privatized and business-driven, it is hard for experts to decipher scientific- from business-oriented claims. The cost-effectiveness of SOF for individuals or society unclear. These facts place the burden of responsibility on the treating physician, who should inform patients about the true likelihood of using their eggs, the age at which to freeze and possible alternatives.

Open versus closed vitrification system of human oocytes and embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis of embryologic and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of embryologic and clinical outcomes following open versus closed vitrification of human oocytes and embryos.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted in main electronic databases up to June 30, 2018 using the following key terms: 'oocyte', 'embryo', 'blastocyst', 'vitrification', 'cryopreservation', 'device', 'survival rate', 'pregnancy rate', etc. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effect model to estimate the value of risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were carried out to further confirm the results.

RESULTS

Twelve (Eight prospective and four retrospective) studies comparing open versus closed vitrification of human oocytes or embryos were included. For prospective studies on oocytes, no evidence for a significant difference in cryosurvival rate (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.80-1.03, P = 0.14; n = 2048) or clinical pregnancy rate (RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 0.80-2.06, P = 0.30; n = 150) was observed. Additionally, there were no significant differences between the two methods concerning secondary endpoints included positive βHCG rate, implantation rate, miscarriage rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, live birth rate, cancellation rate, babies born per transferred blastocysts, or multiple birth rate (P > 0.05). The results of the retrospective studies were similar as the prospective studies.

CONCLUSIONS

It is still impossible to conclude that closed vitrification system could be a substitution for open system in human oocyte and embryo cryopreservation based on current evidence. Therefore, more well-designed prospective studies addressing these issues are still warranted.

Decision making processes of women who seek elective oocyte cryopreservation

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to analyze women's opinions and their decision making processes regarding elective oocyte cryopreservation (OC).

METHODS

One hundred twenty-four women who had elective OC counseling at the CHA Seoul Fertility Center were asked to complete a survey after their first visit. Data collection regarding age, marital status, monthly income, occupation, religion, reproductive history, questions about the participant's view on their own fecundity, and future parenthood were included. The modified Reproductive Concerns After Cancer scale and the Decisional Conflict Scale were used for analysis.

RESULTS

The participants' mean age was 37.1 ± 4.8 years old. Eighty-six percent of the participants had regular periods. Ninety-two percent thought it was important to have their own biological offspring, and 86% were willing to pursue OC. Forty-nine percent appeared to have high DCS scores regarding making a decision of OC. Sixty-eight percent pursued OC, and the mean number of oocytes cryopreserved per patient was 10.5 ± 8.3. Multivariate analysis revealed that age was the only factor associated with high DCS scores (P = 0.002). Feeling less fertile than other women of same age and low DCS scores were the factors associated with pursuing OC (P = 0.02 and 0.004, respectively) after adjusting for possible confounding factors, including age.

CONCLUSIONS

Older women had more difficulties in making decisions about OC. Adjusting for age, women who thought that they were less fertile than other women of same age and those with lower decisional conflict were more likely to pursue OC. Further studies should focus on the validation of older women's decisional conflicts regarding OC.

Pre-clinical validation of a closed surface system (Cryotop SC) for the vitrification of oocytes and embryos in the mouse model

Vitrification is currently a well-established technique for the cryopreservation of oocytes and embryos. It can be achieved either by direct (open systems) or indirect (closed systems) contact with liquid nitrogen. While there is not a direct evidence of disease transmission by transferred cryopreserved embryos, it was experimentally demonstrated that cross-contamination between liquid nitrogen and embryos may occur, and thus, the use of closed devices has been recommended to avoid the risk of contamination. Unfortunately, closed systems may result in lower cooling rates compared to open systems, due to the thermal insulation of the samples, which may cause ice crystal formation resulting in impaired results. In our study, we aimed to validate a newly developed vitrification device (Cryotop SC) that has been specifically designed for being used as a closed system. The cooling and warming rates calculated for the closed system were 5.254 °C/min and 43.522 °C/min, respectively. Results obtained with the closed system were equivalent to those with the classic Cryotop (open system), with survival rates in oocytes close to 100%. Similarly, the potential of the survived oocytes to develop up to good quality blastocysts after parthenogenetic activation between both groups was statistically equivalent. Assessment of the meiotic spindle and chromosome distribution by fluorescence microscopy in vitrified oocytes showed alike morphologies between the open and closed system. No differences were found either between the both systems in terms of survival rates of one-cell stage embryos or blastocysts, as well as, in the potential of the vitrified/warmed blastocysts to develop to full-term after transferred to surrogate females.

Why all women should freeze their eggs

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of oocyte cryopreservation via vitrification has increased lately, becoming a common strategy in many IVF centers. This review summarizes the current state of oocyte vitrification, by analyzing the most recent reports on its use in IVF as part of infertile treatment and its contribution to elective fertility preservation (EFP).

RECENT FINDINGS

Oocyte vitrification has become helpful for managing different clinical situations currently providing similar results to fresh oocytes. Owing to satisfactory results, oocyte vitrification is being offered to healthy women to extend their reproductive options (EFP). Although little is known about outcomes in this specific population, new evidence is starting to emerge. Currently, most women are motivated by age and lack of partner. Age is strongly related to the probability of having a child with better chances when they do EFP younger than 35. In contrast to the biological efficiency, the majority of studies show that EFP is more cost-effective at 37-38 years.

SUMMARY

Oocyte vitrification is an efficient tool which can be helpful in managing the IVF cycle. Fertility preservation providers should inform women about their specific probabilities according to their age at vitrification, making emphasis in the fact that egg freezing does not guarantee success, but increases the possibilities of having a biological child in the future.

Egg donation of vitrified oocytes bank produces similar pregnancy rates by blastocyst transfer when compared to fresh cycle

PURPOSE

Advances in reproductive techniques, mainly the introduction of oocyte vitrification, have provided the opportunity to conceive from oocyte banks. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of fresh and vitrified oocytes in an egg donation program following blastocyst transfer.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 504 oocyte donation cycles. All donor women were younger than 30 years of age. The recipient cycles were divided into two groups: fresh oocytes (n = 78) or vitrified oocytes (n = 426). All oocytes were fertilized by ICSI using ejaculated sperm, followed by blastocyst transfer. Endometrium preparation was performed with estradiol valerate plus micronized progesterone according to standard protocols.

RESULTS

Recipients were of similar age (fresh 42.0 ± 4.5 years vs vitrified 41.8 ± 4.8 years; p = 0.790). The fresh group received more mature oocytes for injection compared to the vitrified group (10.1 ± 2.8 vs 9.2 ± 2.2; p = 0.005). The two pronuclei (2PN) rate (74.5 vs 77.4%; p = 0.195) and blastocyst rate (48.8 vs 51.6%; 0.329) were similar between the fresh and vitrified groups, respectively. The rates of clinical pregnancy were 60.9% in the fresh and 59.0% in the vitrified groups (p = 0.771).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that vitrified oocytes result in similar pregnancy rates when compared to fresh oocytes with blastocyst transfer in an egg donation program. Moreover, vitrified oocytes may allow for a better cycle schedule, starting with a lower number of oocytes to be fertilized. Therefore, we hypothesize that egg banks with vitrified oocytes could be safely utilized in an egg donation program.

Safety and efficiency of oocyte vitrification

As the oocyte is the starting point for a new life, artificial reproductive technology (ART) techniques should not affect the (ultra) structural and functional integrity, or the developmental competence. Oocyte vitrification -one of the most significant achievements in human ART during the past decade- should therefore be a safe and efficient technique. This review discusses the principles and developments of the existing and future techniques, applications possibilities and safety concerns. The broad range of vitrification media and devices that are currently available, show differences in their effects on the oocyte ultrastructure and preimplantation development. It is not yet fully decided whether this has an influence on the obstetric and neonatal outcome, since only limited information is available with different media and devices. For autologous oocytes, the obstetric and neonatal outcomes appear promising and comparable to pregnancies obtained with fresh oocytes. This however, is not the case for heterologous fresh or vitrified oocytes, where the immunological foreign foetus induces adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Besides the oocyte vitrification process itself, the effect of multiple stimulations (for oocyte banking or for oocyte donors), seems to influence the possibility to develop gynaecological cancers further in life. Automated vitrification/warming should offer a consistent, cross-contamination free process that offers the highest safety level for the users. They should also produce more consistent results in survival, development and clinical pregnancies between different IVF clinics.

Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance

BACKGROUND

Successful cryopreservation of oocytes and embryos is essential not only to maximize the safety and efficacy of ovarian stimulation cycles in an IVF treatment, but also to enable fertility preservation. Two cryopreservation methods are routinely used: slow-freezing or vitrification. Slow-freezing allows for freezing to occur at a sufficiently slow rate to permit adequate cellular dehydration while minimizing intracellular ice formation. Vitrification allows the solidification of the cell(s) and of the extracellular milieu into a glass-like state without the formation of ice.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The objective of our study was to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes following slow-freezing/thawing versus vitrification/warming of oocytes and embryos and to inform the development of World Health Organization guidance on the most effective cryopreservation method.

SEARCH METHODS

A Medline search was performed from 1966 to 1 August 2016 using the following search terms: (Oocyte(s) [tiab] OR (Pronuclear[tiab] OR Embryo[tiab] OR Blastocyst[tiab]) AND (vitrification[tiab] OR freezing[tiab] OR freeze[tiab]) AND (pregnancy[tiab] OR birth[tiab] OR clinical[tiab]). Queries were limited to those involving humans. RCTs and cohort studies that were published in full-length were considered eligible. Each reference was reviewed for relevance and only primary evidence and relevant articles from the bibliographies of included articles were considered. References were included if they reported cryosurvival rate, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), live-birth rate (LBR) or delivery rate for slow-frozen or vitrified human oocytes or embryos. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model to calculate relative risk ratios (RR) and 95% CI.

OUTCOMES

One RCT study comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification of oocytes was included. Vitrification was associated with increased ongoing CPR per cycle (RR = 2.81, 95% CI: 1.05-7.51; P = 0.039; 48 and 30 cycles, respectively, per transfer (RR = 1.81, 95% CI 0.71-4.67; P = 0.214; 47 and 19 transfers) and per warmed/thawed oocyte (RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.02-1.28; P = 0.018; 260 and 238 oocytes). One RCT comparing vitrification versus fresh oocytes was analysed. In vitrification and fresh cycles, respectively, no evidence for a difference in ongoing CPR per randomized woman (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.87-1.21; P = 0.744, 300 women in each group), per cycle (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.86-1.18; P = 0.934; 267 versus 259 cycles) and per oocyte utilized (RR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.82-1.26; P = 0.873; 3286 versus 3185 oocytes) was reported. Findings were consistent with relevant cohort studies. Of the seven RCTs on embryo cryopreservation identified, three met the inclusion criteria (638 warming/thawing cycles at cleavage and blastocyst stage), none of which involved pronuclear-stage embryos. A higher CPR per cycle was noted with embryo vitrification compared with slow-freezing, though this was of borderline statistical significance (RR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.00-3.59; P = 0.051; three RCTs; I2 = 71.9%). LBR per cycle was reported by one RCT performed with cleavage-stage embryos and was higher for vitrification (RR = 2.28; 95% CI: 1.17-4.44; P =  0.016; 216 cycles; one RCT). A secondary analysis was performed focusing on embryo cryosurvival rate. Pooled data from seven RCTs (3615 embryos) revealed a significant improvement in embryo cryosurvival following vitrification as compared with slow-freezing (RR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.30-1.93; P < 0.001; I2 = 93%).

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Data from available RCTs suggest that vitrification/warming is superior to slow-freezing/thawing with regard to clinical outcomes (low quality of the evidence) and cryosurvival rates (moderate quality of the evidence) for oocytes, cleavage-stage embryos and blastocysts. The results were confirmed by cohort studies. The improvements obtained with the introduction of vitrification have several important clinical implications in ART. Based on this evidence, in particular regarding cryosurvival rates, laboratories that continue to use slow-freezing should consider transitioning to the use of vitrification for cryopreservation.

Fresh versus cryopreserved oocyte donation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Utilization of cryopreserved instead of fresh donor oocytes has rapidly increased in recent years. Whether treatment outcomes are comparable has, however, remained controversial.

RECENT FINDINGS

More than 24% of initiated oocyte donation cycles in the USA during 2013-2014 involved previously cryopreserved oocytes. The use of cryopreserved-donated oocytes may simplify logistics and lower costs per treatment cycle. Whether cryopreserved donor oocytes also lower costs per live birth is still undetermined as they result in lower live birth rates in comparison to fresh donor oocyte cycles. National data regarding the safety of donated oocytes, including miscarriage rates and neonatal health outcomes, are lacking.

SUMMARY

Currently available data on cryopreserved-donated oocytes are incomplete and, therefore, still insufficient to claim equivalency between fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes. Until sufficient data are available, patients should be advised about advantages and disadvantages of both methods of oocyte donation, and the use of cryopreserved oocytes should be considered only with caution and appropriate informed consent. Because banking of donated human oocytes facilities their commercial trade, it challenges basic ethical considerations, which have been the basis of oocyte donation since its inception.

A novel technique based on in vitro oocyte injection to improve CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in zebrafish

Contemporary improvements in the type II clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) system offer a convenient way for genome editing in zebrafish. However, the low efficiencies of genome editing and germline transmission require a time-intensive and laborious screening work. Here, we reported a method based on in vitro oocyte storage by injecting oocytes in advance and incubating them in oocyte storage medium to significantly improve the efficiencies of genome editing and germline transmission by in vitro fertilization (IVF) in zebrafish. Compared to conventional methods, the prior micro-injection of zebrafish oocytes improved the efficiency of genome editing, especially for the sgRNAs with low targeting efficiency. Due to high throughputs, simplicity and flexible design, this novel strategy will provide an efficient alternative to increase the speed of generating heritable mutants in zebrafish by using CRISPR/Cas9 system.

Long Cut Straw Provides Stable the Rates of Survival, Pregnancy and Live Birth for Vitrification of Human Blasotcysts

Most of the commercial devices for vitrification are directly immersed into the warming solution (WS) for increasing of warming rate. However, the previous modified cut standard straw (MCS) which has reported is difficult to immerse into the WS. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the long cut straw (LCS) could be useful as a stable tool for vitrified-warmed human blastocysts. A total of 138 vitrified-warmed cycles were performed between November 2013 and November 2014 (exclusion criteria: women ≥38 years old, poor responder, surgical retrieval sperm, and severe male factor). The artificial shrinkage was conducted using 29-gauge needles. Ethylene glycol and dimethyl sulfoxide (7.5% and 15% (v/v)) were used as cryoprotectants. Freezing and warming were conducted using the LCS tool. The cap of LCS was removed using the forceps in the liquid nitrogen (LN₂) and then directly immersed into the first WS for 1 min at 37℃ (1 M sucrose). Only re-expanded blastocysts were transferred after it was cultured in sequential media for 18-20 h. A total of 294 blastocysts were warmed, and all were recovered (100%). Two hundred eighty-five embryos were survived (96.9%). The vitrifiedwarmed blastocysts of all patients were transferred without any cancellation. We were able to achieve a reasonable implantation (24.2%), following by clinical pregnancy (36.2%), which then continued to ongoing pregnancy (36.2%), and live birth (31.2%). Using LCS is achieved the acceptable rates of survival, pregnancy and live birth. Therefore, the LCS could be considered as a stable and simple tool for human embryo vitrificaton.