Impacts of double biopsy and double vitrification on the clinical outcomes following euploid blastocyst transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY QUESTION

Compared to the 'single biopsy + single vitrification' approach, do 'double biopsy + double vitrification' or 'single biopsy + double vitrification' arrangements compromise subsequent clinical outcomes following euploidy blastocyst transfer?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Both 'double biopsy + double vitrification' and 'single biopsy + double vitrification' led to reduced live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates and clinical pregnancy rates.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY?

It is not uncommon to receive inconclusive results following blastocyst biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Often these blastocysts are warmed for re-test after a second biopsy, experiencing 'double biopsy + double vitrification'. Furthermore, to achieve better workflow, IVF laboratories may choose to routinely vitrify all blastocysts and schedule biopsy at a preferred timing, involving 'single biopsy + double vitrification'. However, in the current literature, there is a lack of systematic evaluation of both arrangements regarding their potential clinical risks in reference to the most common 'single biopsy + single vitrification' approach.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed, with the protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023469143). A search in PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies was carried out on 30 August 2023, using the keywords 'biopsy' and 'vitrification' and associated variations respectively. Only studies involving frozen transfers of PGT-A tested euploid blastocysts were included, with those involving PGT-M or PGT-SR excluded.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Study groups included blastocysts having undergone 'double biopsy + double vitrification' or 'single biopsy + double vitrification', with a 'single biopsy + single vitrification' group used as control. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy, while secondary outcomes included live birth/ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, and post-warming survival rates. Random effects meta-analysis was performed with risk ratios (RR) and 95% CIs were used to present outcome comparisons.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A total of 607 records were identified through the initial search and nine studies (six full articles and three abstracts) were eventually included. Compared to 'single biopsy + single vitrification', 'double biopsy + double vitrification' was associated with reduced clinical pregnancy rates (six studies, n = 18 754; RR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.71-0.89; I2 = 0%) and live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates (seven studies, n = 20 964; RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.63-0.82; I2 = 0%). However, no significant changes were seen in miscarriage rates (seven studies, n = 22 332; RR = 1.40, 95% CI = 0.92-2.11; I2 = 53%) and post-warming survival rates (three studies, n = 13 562; RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.99-1.01; I2 = 0%) following 'double biopsy + double vitrification'. Furthermore, 'single biopsy + double vitrification' was also linked with decreased clinical pregnancy rates (six studies, n = 13 284; RR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.76-0.92; I2 = 39%) and live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates (seven studies, n = 16 800; RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.69-0.91; I2 = 70%), and increased miscarriage rates (five studies, n = 15 781; RR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.31-1.67; I2 = 0%), but post-warming survival rates were not affected (three studies, n = 12 452; RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.97-1.01; I2 = 71%) by 'single biopsy + double vitrification'.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

All studies included in this meta-analysis were retrospective with varying levels of heterogeneity for different outcomes. Not all studies had accounted for potential confounding factors. Only one study reported neonatal outcomes.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our data indicated adverse impacts of 'double biopsy + double vitrification' and 'single biopsy + double vitrification' on clinical outcomes following euploid blastocyst transfers. Patients should be carefully consulted about the risks when offered such approaches. The biopsy process should be carried out as carefully and competently as possible to minimize an inconclusive diagnosis.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

R.W. is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Emerging Leadership Investigator Grant (2009767). There is no other external funding to report. All authors report no conflict of interest.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023469143.

Current research status and clinical applications of noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing: A review

Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing (ni-PGT) is conducted by obtaining genetic information from embryos through the analysis of free DNA released by embryos in spent embryo culture medium or blastocoel fluid. Compared to conventional preimplantation genetic testing relying on trophectoderm biopsy, ni-PGT is characterized by its noninvasiveness. It has demonstrated early advancements in the detection of embryonic chromosomal aneuploidies and the diagnosis of monogenic diseases, showcasing considerable potential for clinical application. However, there are substantial controversies in the literature concerning the reliability of ni-PGT, the source of cell-free DNA, and maternal contamination. This paper elaborates on the principles, research advancements, effectiveness, and limitations of ni-PGT to provide a basis for clinical applications.

Success rates with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in good prognosis patients are dependent on age

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate cumulative live birth after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) with next generation sequencing (NGS) compared with morphology alone among patients aged 21-40 years undergoing single blastocyst transfer.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) clinics.

PATIENT(S)

Patients aged 21-40 years undergoing first autologous retrieval cycles resulting in ≥5 fertilized oocytes, with subsequent single blastocyst transfer in Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology clinics from 2016-2019.

INTERVENTION

PGT-A using NGS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome was cumulative live birth per retrieval. Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth per transfer.

RESULT(S)

A total of 56,469 retrieval cycles were included in the analysis. Retrieval cycles were stratified based on age (<35, 35-37, and 38-40 years) and exposure to PGT-A with NGS. Modified Poisson regression modeling was used to evaluate the association between PGT-A and cumulative live birth per retrieval while controlling for covariates. In this cohort, most cycles did not use PGT-A (n = 49,608; 88%). After adjusting for covariates, the use of PGT-A was associated with a slightly lower cumulative live birth in individuals aged <35 years (risk ratio [RR]: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93-0.99) compared with no PGT, but higher cumulative live birth in ages 35-37 years (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.00-1.08), and 38-40 years (RR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.07-1.20). A subgroup analysis limited to freeze-all cycles (n = 29,041) showed that PGT-A was associated with higher cumulative live birth in individuals aged ≥35 years and was similar to no PGT in individuals aged <35 years. Miscarriage was significantly less likely in individuals aged ≥35 years using PGT-A compared with no PGT-A.

CONCLUSION(S)

In this large national database study, success rates in cycles using PGT-A were dependent on age. Cumulative live birth was observed to be significantly less likely in PGT-A cycles among individuals aged <35 years and more likely among individuals aged 38-40 years, compared with no PGT-A. In individuals with no fresh transfer, results were similar. Moreover, miscarriage was significantly less likely with PGT-A among individuals aged 35-40 years in a subgroup analysis of freeze-all cycles.

Updates in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT)

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) involves taking a biopsy of an early embryo created through in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Genetic testing is performed on the biopsy, in order to select which embryo to transfer. PGT began as an experimental procedure in the 1990s, but is now an integral part of assisted human reproduction (AHR). PGT allows for embryo selection which can reduce the risk of transmission of inherited disease and may reduce the chance of implantation failure and pregnancy loss. This is a rapidly evolving area, which raises important ethical issues. This review article aims to give a brief history of PGT, an overview of the current evidence in PGT along with highlighting exciting areas of research to advance this technology.

The use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a committee opinion

The use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in the United States has been increasing steadily. Moreover, the underlying technology used for 24-chromosome analysis continues to evolve rapidly. The value of PGT-A as a routine screening test for all patients undergoing in vitro fertilization has not been demonstrated. Although some earlier single-center studies reported higher live-birth rates after PGT-A in favorable-prognosis patients, recent multicenter, randomized control trials in women with available blastocysts concluded that the overall pregnancy outcomes via frozen embryo transfer were similar between PGT-A and conventional in vitro fertilization. The value of PGT-A to lower the risk of clinical miscarriage is also unclear, although these studies have important limitations. This document replaces the document of the same name, last published in 2018.

Impact of double trophectoderm biopsy on reproductive outcomes following single euploid blastocyst transfer

OBJECTIVES

To study the effect of double trophectoderm biopsy on clinical outcomes following single euploid blastocyst transfer.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of 2046 single euploid frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers from January 2015 to June 2022 in a single centre. All patients undergoing a frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FTET) cycle with euploid blastocysts, biopsied for any indication, were included. The outcomes were compared for blastocysts which were biopsied and vitrified once (Group 1, n = 1684), biopsied once but vitrified twice (Group 2, n = 312) and biopsied and vitrified twice (Group 3n = 50). We adjusted for confounders and performed subgroup analysis for PGT-A, PGT-M and PGT-SR cycles. The primary outcome was live birth rate. Secondary outcomes included pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, birthweight and sex ratio.

RESULTS

After adjusting for confounders (previous failed euploid implantations, embryo quality and day of biopsy), embryos which were biopsied twice had lower OR for clinical pregnancy (0.48, CI 0.26-0.88, p = 0.019) and for live birth (0.50 CI 0.27-0.92, p = 0.025) compared to controls. Embryos which were biopsied once but vitrified twice had no different ORs for all reproductive outcomes compared to controls. No significant difference was observed for neonatal birthweight or sex ratio amongst the three groups. This is a retrospective single centre study with inherent bias and results may not be transferable to all settings.

CONCLUSION

This study is the largest to date assessing the outcomes of FTET cycles following double trophectoderm biopsy. The results are in keeping with the existing literature and can be incorporated into patient counselling. Whilst double biopsy seems to adversely impact LBR, it is only one of the many factors that can affect success rates. The subfertility background and embryo characteristics should not be overlooked. This study provides reassuring evidence since double biopsied embryos still result in live births with no difference in sex ratio or birthweight. However, long term follow up of the off-springs is lacking and should be reported in future studies.

The impact of a second embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M) with inconclusive results on pregnancy potential: results from a matched case-control study

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether a second biopsy, following a first diagnostic failure on blastocysts tested for preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M), allows to obtain genetic diagnosis and to what extent this procedure can influence clinical pregnancy and live birth rates compared to the PGT-M process with a successful genetic diagnosis from the first biopsy.

METHODS

Embryos from women who underwent PGT-M in an infertility centre and who had been transferred after two biopsies for genetic analysis (n = 27) were matched in a 1:1 ratio accordingly to women's age (± 1 year) and fertility status (fertile vs infertile), as well as with the study period, with embryos who were transferred after receiving a conclusive PGT result straight after the first biopsy (n = 27). The main evaluated outcome was clinical pregnancy rate following embryo transfers in which healthy embryos were transferred after only one biopsy and those in which an embryo was transferred after being re-biopsied. Live birth rate was the secondary outcome.

RESULTS

Clinical pregnancy rate was 52% (95% CI: 34-69) following the transfer of a single-biopsy blastocyst and 30% (95% CI: 16-48) following the transfer of a re-biopsied blastocyst. The likelihood to have a healthy baby was 33% (95% CI: 19-52) following the transfer of a blastocyst biopsied once and 22% (95% CI: 11-41) following the transfer of a re-biopsied blastocyst.

CONCLUSIONS

The re-biopsy intervention seems to considerably reduce the pregnancy potential of a blastocyst. However, a greater sample size is necessary to clarify this issue definitively.

How should the best human embryo in vitro be? Current and future challenges for embryo selection

In-vitro fertilization (IVF) aims at overcoming the causes of infertility and lead to a healthy live birth. To maximize IVF efficiency, it is critical to identify and transfer the most competent embryo within a cohort produced by a couple during a cycle. Conventional static embryo morphological assessment involves sequential observations under a light microscope at specific timepoints. The introduction of time-lapse technology enhanced morphological evaluation via the continuous monitoring of embryo preimplantation in vitro development, thereby unveiling features otherwise undetectable via multiple static assessments. Although an association exists, blastocyst morphology poorly predicts chromosomal competence. In fact, the only reliable approach currently available to diagnose the embryonic karyotype is trophectoderm biopsy and comprehensive chromosome testing to assess non-mosaic aneuploidies, namely preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). Lately, the focus is shifting towards the fine-tuning of non-invasive technologies, such as "omic" analyses of waste products of IVF (e.g., spent culture media) and/or artificial intelligence-powered morphologic/morphodynamic evaluations. This review summarizes the main tools currently available to assess (or predict) embryo developmental, chromosomal, and reproductive competence, their strengths, the limitations, and the most probable future challenges.

Multiple embryo manipulations in PGT-A cycles may result in inferior clinical outcomes

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do embryos that undergo a thaw, biopsy and re-vitrification (TBR) for pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) have different ploidy and transfer outcomes compared with fresh biopsied embryos?

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of all embryos that underwent the following procedures: fresh biopsy for PGT-A (fresh biopsy); embryos that were warmed, biopsied for PGT-A and re-vitrified (single biopsy TBR); embryos with a no signal result after initial biopsy that were subsequently warmed, biopsied and re-vitrified (double biopsy TBR). The patients who underwent transfers of those embryos at a single academic institution between March 2013 and December 2021 were also studied.

RESULTS

About 30% of embryos planned for TBR underwent attrition. Euploidy rates were similar after biopsy: fresh biopsy (42.7%); single biopsy TBR (47.5%) (adjusted RR: 0.99, 0.88 to 1.12); and double biopsy TBR 50.3% (adjusted RR: 0.99, 0.80 to 1.21). Ongoing pregnancy over 8 weeks was not statistically significant (double biopsy TBR: 6/19 [31.6%] versus fresh biopsy: 650/1062 [61.2%]) (adjusted RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.03). The miscarriage rate increased (double biopsy TBR: 4/19 [21.1%] versus fresh biopsy: 66/1062 [6.2%])(RR 3.39, 95% CI 1.38 to 8.31). Live birth rate was also lower per transfer for the double biopsy TBR group (double biopsy TBR [18.75%] versus fresh biopsy [53.75%]) (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.98), though not after adjustment (adjusted RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.09). These differences were not seen when single biopsy TBR embryos were transferred.

CONCLUSIONS

Embryos that undergo TBR have an equivalent euploidy rate to fresh biopsied embryos. Despite that, double biopsy TBR embryos may have impaired transfer outcomes.

Embryo drop-out rates in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a retrospective data analysis from the DoLoRes study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the decline in transferable embryos in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles due to (a) non-biopsable blastocyst quality, (b) failure of genetic analysis, (c) diagnosis of uniform numerical or structural chromosomal aberrations, and/or (d) chromosomal aberrations in mosaic constitution.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study comprised outcomes of 1562 blastocysts originating from 363 controlled ovarian stimulation cycles, respectively, 226 IVF couples in the period between January 2016 and December 2018. Inclusion criteria were PGT-A cycles with trophectoderm biopsy (TB) and next generation sequencing (NGS).

RESULTS

Out of 1562 blastocysts, 25.8% were lost due to non-biopsable and/or non-freezable embryo quality. In 10.3% of all biopsied blastocysts, genetic analysis failed. After exclusion of embryos with uniform or chromosomal aberrations in mosaic, only 18.1% of those originally yielded remained as diagnosed euploid embryos suitable for transfer. This translates into 50.4% of patients and 57.6% of stimulated cycles with no euploid embryo left for transfer. The risk that no transfer can take place rose significantly with a lower number of oocytes and with increasing maternal age. The chance for at least one euploid blastocyst/cycle in advanced maternal age (AMA)-patients was 33.3% compared to 52.1% in recurrent miscarriage (RM), 59.8% in recurrent implantation failure (RIF), and 60.0% in severe male factor (SMF).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates that PGT-A is accompanied by high embryo drop-out rates. IVF-practitioners should be aware that their patients run a high risk of ending up without any embryo suitable for transfer after (several) stimulation cycles, especially in AMA patients. Patients should be informed in detail about the frequency of inconclusive or mosaic results, with the associated risk of not having an euploid embryo available for transfer after PGT-A, as well as the high cost involved in this type of testing.

A novel embryo biopsy morphological analysis and genetic integrality criterion system significantly improves the outcome of preimplantation genetic testing

PURPOSE

While efforts have been made to establish blastocyst grading systems in the past decades, little research has examined the quality of biopsy specimens. This study is the first to correlate the morphology of biopsied trophectoderm (TE) cells to their quality and subsequent genetic testing results of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), through an innovative Morphological Analysis and Genetic Integrality Criterion (MAGIC) system.

METHODS

Biopsied TE cells were first evaluated according to the MAGIC procedure, followed by whole-genome amplification (WGA) and library construction, and then sequenced using the Illumina X Ten Platform. Copy number variation (CNV) and allele drop-out (ADO) rates as well as test failure rates were compared and analyzed.

RESULTS

Our data explores the relationship between TE cell morphology and its quality and final genetic testing outcome, which is established based on the MAGIC system. MAGIC guarantees that only high- or good-quality TE cells are used for genetic testing to generate excellent data uniformity and lower ADO rates. Low-quality cells containing biopsied TE cell mass are responsible for the "background noise" of CNV analysis.

CONCLUSION

The MAGIC application has effectively decreased the false-positive mosaicism, hence to ensure the stability and veracity of detection results, to avoid misdiagnoses, and to improve accuracy, as well as to avoid re-biopsy procedures. The study also contributes to understand how the IVF laboratory and the molecular biology laboratory depend on each other to achieve good-quality PGT results, which are clinically relevant for the patients.

Double vitrification and warming does not compromise the chance of live birth after single unbiopsied blastocyst transfer

STUDY QUESTION

Does double vitrification and thawing of an embryo compromise the chance of live birth after a single blastocyst transfer?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The live birth rate (LBR) obtained after double vitrification was comparable to that obtained after single vitrification.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Double vitrification-warming (DVW) is commonly practiced to accommodate surplus viable embryos suitable for transfer, to allow retesting of inconclusively diagnosed blastocysts in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), and to circumvent limitations associated with national policies on embryo culture in certain countries. Despite its popularity, the evidence concerning the impact of DVW practice on ART outcomes is limited and lacking credibility. This is the first thorough investigation of clinical pregnancy and LBR following DVW in the case where the first round of vitrification occurred at the zygote stage and the second round occurred at the blastocyst stage in the absence of biopsy.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

This is a retrospective observational analysis of n = 407 single blastocyst transfers whereby embryos created by IVF/ICSI were vitrified-warmed once (single vitrification-warming (SVW) n = 310) or twice (DVW, n = 97) between January 2017 and December 2021.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

In the SVW group, blastocysts were vitrified on Day 5/6 and warmed on the day of embryo transfer (ET). In the DVW group, two pronuclear (2PN) zygotes were first vitrified-warmed and then re-vitrified on Day 5/6 and warmed on the day of ET. Exclusion criteria were ETs from PGT and vitrified-warmed oocyte cycles. All of the ETs were single blastocyst transfers performed at the University Hospital Zurich in Switzerland following natural or artificial endometrial preparation.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and LBR were all comparable between the DVW and SVW groups. The CPR for DVW was 44.3% and for SVW it was 42.3% (P = 0.719). The LBR for DVW was 30.9% and for SVW it was 28.7% (P = 0.675). The miscarriage rate was additionally similar between the groups: 27.9% for DVW and 32.1% for SVW groups (P = 0.765).

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

The study is limited by its retrospective nature. Caution should be taken concerning interpretation of these findings in cases where DVW occurs at different stages of embryo development.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The result of the present study on DVW procedure provides a framework for counselling couples on their chance of clinical pregnancy per warming cycle. It additionally provides confidence and reassurance to laboratory professionals in certain countries where national policies limit embryo culture strategies making DVW inevitable.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

This work was supported by the University Research Priority Program 'Human Reproduction Reloaded' of the University of Zurich. The authors have no conflict of interest related to this study to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Opening the black box: why do euploid blastocysts fail to implant? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A normal chromosomal constitution defined through PGT-A assessing all chromosomes on trophectoderm (TE) biopsies represents the strongest predictor of embryo implantation. Yet, its positive predictive value is not higher than 50-60%. This gap of knowledge on the causes of euploid blastocysts' reproductive failure is known as 'the black box of implantation'.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

Several embryonic, maternal, paternal, clinical, and IVF laboratory features were scrutinized for their putative association with reproductive success or implantation failure of euploid blastocysts.

SEARCH METHODS

A systematic bibliographical search was conducted without temporal limits up to August 2021. The keywords were '(blastocyst OR day5 embryo OR day6 embryo OR day7 embryo) AND (euploid OR chromosomally normal OR preimplantation genetic testing) AND (implantation OR implantation failure OR miscarriage OR abortion OR live birth OR biochemical pregnancy OR recurrent implantation failure)'. Overall, 1608 items were identified and screened. We included all prospective or retrospective clinical studies and randomized-controlled-trials (RCTs) that assessed any feature associated with live-birth rates (LBR) and/or miscarriage rates (MR) among non-mosaic euploid blastocyst transfer after TE biopsy and PGT-A. In total, 41 reviews and 372 papers were selected, clustered according to a common focus, and thoroughly reviewed. The PRISMA guideline was followed, the PICO model was adopted, and ROBINS-I and ROB 2.0 scoring were used to assess putative bias. Bias across studies regarding the LBR was also assessed using visual inspection of funnel plots and the trim and fill method. Categorical data were combined with a pooled-OR. The random-effect model was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Between-study heterogeneity was addressed using I2. Whenever not suitable for the meta-analysis, the included studies were simply described for their results. The study protocol was registered at http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ (registration number CRD42021275329).

OUTCOMES

We included 372 original papers (335 retrospective studies, 30 prospective studies and 7 RCTs) and 41 reviews. However, most of the studies were retrospective, or characterized by small sample sizes, thus prone to bias, which reduces the quality of the evidence to low or very low. Reduced inner cell mass (7 studies, OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.27-0.52, I2 = 53%), or TE quality (9 studies, OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.43-0.67, I2 = 70%), overall blastocyst quality worse than Gardner's BB-grade (8 studies, OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.24-0.67, I2 = 83%), developmental delay (18 studies, OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.49-0.63, I2 = 47%), and (by qualitative analysis) some morphodynamic abnormalities pinpointed through time-lapse microscopy (abnormal cleavage patterns, spontaneous blastocyst collapse, longer time of morula formation I, time of blastulation (tB), and duration of blastulation) were all associated with poorer reproductive outcomes. Slightly lower LBR, even in the context of PGT-A, was reported among women ≥38 years (7 studies, OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.75-1.00, I2 = 31%), while obesity was associated with both lower LBR (2 studies, OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.55-0.79, I2 = 0%) and higher MR (2 studies, OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.08-2.99, I2 = 52%). The experience of previous repeated implantation failures (RIF) was also associated with lower LBR (3 studies, OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55-0.93, I2 = 0%). By qualitative analysis, among hormonal assessments, only abnormal progesterone levels prior to transfer were associated with LBR and MR after PGT-A. Among the clinical protocols used, vitrified-warmed embryo transfer was more effective than fresh transfer (2 studies, OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.05-2.33, I2 = 23%) after PGT-A. Lastly, multiple vitrification-warming cycles (2 studies, OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22-0.77, I2 = 50%) or (by qualitative analysis) a high number of cells biopsied may slightly reduce the LBR, while simultaneous zona-pellucida opening and TE biopsy allowed better results than the Day 3 hatching-based protocol (3 studies, OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.18-1.69, I2 = 0%).

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Embryo selection aims at shortening the time-to-pregnancy, while minimizing the reproductive risks. Knowing which features are associated with the reproductive competence of euploid blastocysts is therefore critical to define, implement, and validate safer and more efficient clinical workflows. Future research should be directed towards: (i) systematic investigations of the mechanisms involved in reproductive aging beyond de novo chromosomal abnormalities, and how lifestyle and nutrition may accelerate or exacerbate their consequences; (ii) improved evaluation of the uterine and blastocyst-endometrial dialogue, both of which represent black boxes themselves; (iii) standardization/automation of embryo assessment and IVF protocols; (iv) additional invasive or preferably non-invasive tools for embryo selection. Only by filling these gaps we may finally crack the riddle behind 'the black box of implantation'.

Should embryo rebiopsy be considered a regular strategy to increase the number of embryos available for transfer?

PURPOSE

To investigate whether embryo rebiopsy increases the yield of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles.

METHODS

Retrospective study including 18,028 blastocysts submitted for trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) between January 2016 and December 2021 in a private IVF center. Out of the 517 embryos categorized as inconclusive, 400 survived intact to the warming procedure, re-expanded, and were suitable for rebiopsy. Of them, 71 rebiopsied blastocysts were transferred. Factors affecting the probability of obtaining an undiagnosed blastocyst and clinical outcomes from blastocysts biopsied once and twice were investigated.

RESULTS

The overall diagnostic rate was 97.1%, with 517 blastocysts receiving inconclusive reports. Several blastocyst and laboratory features, such as the day of the biopsy, the stage of development, and the biopsy methodology, were related to the risk of obtaining an inconclusive diagnosis after PGT-A. A successful diagnosis was obtained in 384 of the rebiopsied blastocysts, 238 of which were chromosomally transferable. A total of 71 rebiopsied blastocysts were transferred, resulting in 32 clinical pregnancies [(clinical pregnancy rate (CPR)=45.1%], 16 miscarriages [(miscarriage rate (MR)=41%], and, until September 2020, 12 live births [(live birth rate (LBR)=23.1%]. A significantly lower LBR and higher MR were obtained after transferring rebiopsied blastocysts compared to those biopsied once.

CONCLUSION

Although an extra round of biopsy and vitrification may cause a detrimental effect on embryo viability, re-analyzing the test-failure blastocysts contributes to increasing the number of euploid blastocysts available for transfer and the LBR.

Impact of Multiple Vitrification-Warming Procedures and Insemination Methods on Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes in Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy

This study was to determine whether multiple vitrification-warming procedures and insemination method are associated with pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). This was a retrospective, single-center, observational study of 112 patients who underwent standard PGT-A practice and 154 patients who desired PGT-A for their vitrified unbiopsied blastocysts. A total of 97 euploid blastocysts biopsied and vitrified-warmed once and 117 euploid blastocysts biopsied once but vitrified-warmed twice (83 in vitro fertilization [IVF]-derived and 34 intracytoplasmic sperm injection [ICSI]-derived euploid blastocysts) were transferred. The primary outcome was the blastocyst survival rate for transfer, live birth rate, and neonatal outcomes. The results showed that an additional vitrification-warming procedure on blastocysts resulted in a lower but not statistically different survival rate for transfer. Compared with euploid blastocysts vitrified-warmed once, those vitrified-warmed twice provided statistically similar live birth rate. Neonatal outcomes, including the sex ratio, gestational age, birthweight, preterm birth rate, and low birthweight rate, did not differ between single and double vitrification. No significant differences were observed in rates of blastocyst survival, blastocyst euploid and live birth, and neonatal outcomes resulting from either conventional IVF or ICSI. The neonatal follow-up of babies live-born so far did not report any congenital malformations. In conclusion, an additional vitrification-warming on blastocysts had no detectable adverse impact on clinical outcomes after frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer in PGT-A cases; and ICSI did not confer any benefit in improving clinical outcomes compared with conventional IVF in cases requiring PGT-A on already vitrified nonbiopsied blastocysts.

Clinical and laboratory key performance indicators in IVF: A consensus between the Italian Society of Fertility and Sterility and Reproductive Medicine (SIFES-MR) and the Italian Society of Embryology, Reproduction and Research (SIERR)

PURPOSE

Infertility is increasing worldwide, and many couples seek IVF. Clinical management and laboratory work are fundamental in the IVF journey. Therefore, the definition of reliable key performance indicators (KPIs) based on clinical and laboratory parameters, is essential for internal quality control (IQC). Laboratory performance indicators have been identified and a first attempt to also determine clinical ones has been recently published. However, more detailed indicators are required.

METHODS

An Italian group of experts in Reproductive Medicine from both public and private clinics on behalf of SIFES-MR and SIERR was established to define IVF indicators to monitor clinical performance.

RESULTS

The working group built a consensus on a list of KPIs, performance indicators (PIs) and recommendation indicators (RIs). When deemed necessary, the reference population was stratified by woman age, response to ovarian stimulation and adoption of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). Each indicator was scored with a value from 1 to 5 and a weighted average formula - considering all the suggested parameters-was defined. This formula generates a center performance score, indicating low, average, good, or excellent performance.

CONCLUSION

This study is intended to provide KPIs, PIs and RIs that encompass several essential aspects of a modern IVF clinic, including quality control and constant monitoring of clinical and embryological features. These indicators could be used to assess the quality of each center with the aim of improving efficacy and efficiency in IVF.

Freeze all-first versus biopsy-first: A retrospective analysis of frozen blastocyst transfer cycles with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy

Potential use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is increasing. Patients who have excess embryos cryopreserved at the blastocyst stage may desire PGT-A but there is little data available on options for these patients. We compared the efficacy and safety of the timing on the cryopreservation and trophectoderm(TE) biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) program associated with the better outcomes after frozen blastocyst transfer. Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent PGT-A cycles from January 2016 to December 2019 was carried out. 2684 blastocysts from cycles were subjected to TE biopsy for performing array comparative genomic hybridization test and Next-generation sequencing. All cycles were divided into two according to the timing of biopsy: biopsy-first (n = 211 cases/ 232 transfers) versus freeze all-first (n = 327 cases/ 415 transfers). In the biopsy-first group, embryos were cultured to expanded blastocyst and proceed to TE biopsy on day 5 or day 6 followed by cryopreservation. In the freeze all-first, blastocysts were vitrified and warmed before biopsy. Rates of clinical pregnancy (52.3% vs. 38.7%, P = 0.09) and ongoing pregnancy (44.3% vs. 34.5%, P = 0.07) in biopsy-first were significantly higher than those in freeze all-first. Biopsy-first showed comparable miscarriage rate with freeze all-first (15.2% (33/217) vs.11.1% (10/90), respectively). Rate ratio (RR) for clinical pregnancy was lower in freeze all-first group (adjusted RR = 0.78, 95% confidence interval: 0.65, 0.93). The RRs for miscarriage and live birth was also lower but it did not reach statistical significance. Our result supported performing TE biopsy of blastocyst for PGT-A before vitrification and warming. This finding would contribute to more evidence-based decision in PGT-A cycles.

On the reproductive capabilities of aneuploid human preimplantation embryos

In IVF cycles, the application of aneuploidy testing at the blastocyst stage is quickly growing, and the latest reports estimate almost half of cycles in the US undergo preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). Following PGT-A cycles, understanding the predictive value of an aneuploidy result is paramount for making informed decisions about the embryo's fate and utilization. Compelling evidence from non-selection trials strongly supports that embryos diagnosed with a uniform whole-chromosome aneuploidy very rarely result in the live birth of a healthy baby, while their transfer exposes women to significant risks of miscarriage and chromosomally abnormal pregnancy. On the other hand, embryos displaying low range mosaicism for whole chromosomes have shown reproductive capabilities somewhat equivalent to uniformly euploid embryos, and they have comparable clinical outcomes and gestational risks. Therefore, given their clearly distinct biological origin and clinical consequences, careful differentiation between uniform and mosaic aneuploidy is critical in both the clinical setting when counseling individuals and in the research setting when presenting aneuploidy studies in human embryology. Here, we focus on the evidence gathered so far on PGT-A diagnostic predictive values and reproductive outcomes observed across the broad spectrum of whole-chromosome aneuploidies detected at the blastocyst stage to obtain evidence-based conclusions on the clinical management of aneuploid embryos in the quickly growing PGT-A clinical setting.

Clinical re-biopsy of segmental gains-the primary source of preimplantation genetic testing false positives

PURPOSE

Does re-biopsy of blastocysts classified as abnormal (ABN) due to segmental aneuploidy (SA) have clinical utility?

METHODS

The live birth (LB) outcomes of mosaic SAs, compared to other categories, were determined after transfer of 3084 PGT-A tested blastocysts. An initial 12-month trial thawed 111 blastocysts classified as ABN due to a SA for clinical re-biopsy, with an additional 58 from a subsequent 16-month revised protocol. Where re-biopsy failed to corroborate the original classification, blastocysts were reported as mosaic and suitable for clinical use.

RESULTS

Segmental mosaics had a LB rate (54.1%) which was indistinguishable from that of euploid (53.7%). Numeric mosaics had statistically significant (P < 0.05) reduced LB rates compared to euploid, with high-level numerics (19.2%) also exhibiting a significant reduction compared to low level (42.3%). Of the initial 111 blastocysts with SAs, 85 could be re-biopsied. Segmental gains became suitable for re-biopsy at a high rate (90.9%), with 84.2% (16/19) of these reclassified as mosaic. Only 73.0% of deletions and complex changes were suitable for re-biopsy, of which 73.0% (46/63) were confirmed ABN. The subsequent 16-month period primarily focused on gains, confirming the high rate at which they can be reclassified as clinically useable.

CONCLUSIONS

Blastocysts harboring mosaic segmental duplications, rather than SAs in general, are the primary source of false-positive PGT-A results and represent a category with a LB rate similar to that of euploid. A high degree of confidence in the reliability of PGT-A results can be maintained by performing confirmatory clinical TE biopsies.

National Canadian Survey on the Management of Non-Euploid Embryos

OBJECTIVE

To comprehensively describe current preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) practices and management of non-euploid embryos in Canada.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study utilizing an online survey distributed by email to all medical directors of fertility clinics with independent in vitro fertilization (IVF) embryology laboratories. The survey was designed to determine practice patterns regarding PGT-A usage; PGT-A reference laboratory, platform, and thresholds for classifying embryos; and management of embryos classified as mosaic, inconclusive, or aneuploid.

RESULTS

Twenty-five medical directors (69%) participated in the survey. The majority of clinics (91%) offered PGT-A screening, with 45% of clinics offering PGT-A as routine screening. The majority of clinics (90%) that offered PGT-A received mosaicism data; 61% of these clinics had transferred mosaic embryos, and 94% would transfer mosaic embryos. Clinics that performed ≥1000 IVF cycles annually were more likely to have transferred mosaic embryos (100% vs. 45.5%; P = 0.043). The mean percentage of IVF cycles using PGT-A was lower in clinics that had transferred mosaic embryos (12.3% vs. 30.4%; P = 0.033). Only 1 clinic had transferred an aneuploid embryo, but 2 other clinics would consider this option. The majority of clinics (61%) that receive mosaicism data would recommend noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) following mosaic embryo transfer, with 22% of clinics indicating that this would be the only genetic test offered.

CONCLUSION

We report significant practice variation in PGT-A and management of non-euploid embryos across Canada and highlight areas where consensus should be encouraged.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)-a single-center experience

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and nature of human embryonic aneuploidy based on the preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), the distribution of aneuploidy across the individual chromosomes, and their relationship to maternal age.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single center. The study includes subjects who opted for PGT-A in their in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle from 2016 to 2020. PGT-A was performed on 1501 embryos from 488 patients in 535 cycles. PGT-A was performed using NGS-based technique on Ion Torrent PGM (Life Technologies). Analysis was performed to determine the (i) frequency of the aneuploidy, (ii) the chromosome most commonly affected, (iii) relationship between maternal age and the rate of aneuploidy, and (iv) incidence of segmental aneuploidy.

RESULTS

The overall frequency of aneuploidy was observed to be 46.8%. The incidence of aneuploidy rate was ~ 28% at maternal age < 30 years which steadily increased to ~ 67% in women above 40 years. High frequency of aneuploidy was observed in chromosomes 16, 22, 21, and 15. Segmental abnormalities, involving loss or gain of chromosomal fragments, were observed at a frequency of 5.3%, and highest incidence of segmental gain was observed on the q-arm of chromosome 9.

CONCLUSION

The study provides important information regarding the frequency of the aneuploidy in IVF cohort and the most frequent chromosomal abnormality. The study further emphasizes the relationship between maternal age and aneuploidy. This study has important implications which help clinicians and genetic counselors in providing information in patient counseling.

Accumulation of Cleavage-Stage Embryos by Vitrification may Compromise Embryonic Developmental Potential in Preimplantation Genetic Testing

It was suggested that the embryo pooling was an alternative for patients with insufficient number of embryos for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in a single ovarian stimulation cycle. However, limited study noticed whether it is an efficient strategy to pool cleavage-stage embryos by vitrification. This study included 71 cycles with vitrified-warmed and fresh embryos simultaneously for PGT between May 2016 and May 2021. The embryos from the same patients were split into two groups based on the origin: warming group and fresh group. Embryo development, sequencing results, clinical and neonatal outcomes were compared. The results showed that the rate of high-quality embryos in the warming group was significantly higher than that in the fresh group (64.53% versus 52.61%, P = 0.011); however, the available blastocyst rate in this group was significantly lower than that in the fresh group (47.29% versus 57.83%, P = 0.026). There were 96 and 144 blastocysts that underwent trophectoderm (TE) biopsy in warming and fresh groups, respectively. The high-quality blastocyst rate was significantly lower in the warming group compared to the fresh group (57.29% versus 70.14%, P = 0.041). The rates of genetic transferable blastocyst were comparable between the two groups (P = 0.956). There were no statistical differences in terms of embryo implantation, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage rates, and neonatal outcomes between the two groups. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that the cleavage-stage embryo pooling strategy might be unfavorable for the maintenance of embryonic development potential. If not necessary, it is not recommended to pool cleavage-stage embryos for PGT.

Identifying Balanced Chromosomal Translocations in Human Embryos by Oxford Nanopore Sequencing and Breakpoints Region Analysis

Background: Balanced chromosomal aberrations, especially balanced translocations, can cause infertility, recurrent miscarriage or having chromosomally defective offspring. Preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangement (PGT-SR) has been widely implemented to improve the clinical outcomes by selecting euploid embryos for transfer, whereas embryos with balanced translocation karyotype were difficult to be distinguished by routine genetic techniques from those with a normal karyotype.

Method: In this present study, we developed a clinically applicable method for reciprocal translocation carriers to reduce the risk of pregnancy loss. In the preclinical phase, we identified reciprocal translocation breakpoints in blood of translocation carriers by long-read Oxford Nanopore sequencing, followed by junction-spanning polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Sanger sequencing. In the clinical phase of embryo diagnosis, aneuploidies and unbalanced translocations were screened by comprehensive chromosomal screening (CCS) with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray, carrier embryos were diagnosed by junction-spanning PCR and family haplotype linkage analysis of the breakpoints region. Amniocentesis and cytogenetic analysis of fetuses in the second trimester were performed after embryo transfer to conform the results diagnosed by the presented method.

Results: All the accurate reciprocal translocation breakpoints were effectively identified by Nanopore sequencing and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Twelve embryos were biopsied and detected, the results of junction-spanning PCR and haplotype linkage analysis were consistent. In total, 12 biopsied blastocysts diagnosed to be euploid, in which 6 were aneuploid or unbalanced, three blastocysts were identified to be balanced translocation carriers and three to be normal karyotypes. Two euploid embryos were subsequently transferred back to patients and late prenatal karyotype analysis of amniotic fluid cells was performed. The outcomes diagnosed by the current approach were totally consistent with the fetal karyotypes.

Conclusions: In summary, these investigations in our study illustrated that chromosomal reciprocal translocations in embryos can be accurately diagnosed. Long-read Nanopore sequencing and breakpoint analysis contributes to precisely evaluate the genetic risk of disrupted genes, and provides a way of selecting embryos with normal karyotype, especially for couples those without a reference.

Inter-centre reliability in embryo grading across several IVF clinics is limited: implications for embryo selection

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the intra- and inter-centre reliability in embryo grading performed according to the Istanbul Consensus across several IVF clinics?

DESIGN

Forty Day 3 embryos and 40 blastocysts were photographed on three focal planes. Senior and junior embryologists from 65 clinics were invited to grade them according to the Istanbul Consensus (Study Phase I). All participants then attended interactive training where a panel of experts graded the same embryos (Study Phase II). Finally, a second set of pictures was sent to both embryologists and experts for a blinded evaluation (Study Phase III). Intra-centre reliability was reported for Study Phase I as Cohen's kappa between senior and junior embryologists; inter-centre reliability was instead calculated between senior/junior embryologists and experts in Study Phase I versus III to outline improvements after training (i.e. upgrade of Cohen's kappa category according to Landis and Koch).

RESULTS

Thirty-six embryologists from 18 centres participated (28% participation rate). The intra-centre reliability was (i) substantial (0.63) for blastomere symmetry (range -0.02 to 1.0), (ii) substantial (0.72) for fragmentation (range 0.29-1.0), (iii) substantial (0.66) for blastocyst expansion (range 0.19-1.0), (iv) moderate (0.59) for inner cell mass quality (range 0.07-0.92), (v) moderate (0.56) for trophectoderm quality (range 0.01-0.97). The inter-centre reliability showed an overall improvement from Study Phase I to III, from fair (0.21-0.4) to moderate (0.41-0.6) for all parameters under analysis, except for blastomere fragmentation among senior embryologists, which was already moderate before training.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-centre reliability was generally moderate/substantial, while inter-centre reliability was just fair. The interactive training improved it to moderate, hence this workflow was deemed helpful. The establishment of external quality assessment services (e.g. UK NEQAS) and the avant-garde of artificial intelligence might further improve the reliability of this key practice for embryo selection.

Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for putative mosaic blastocysts: a pilot study

STUDY QUESTION

What is the potential of applying non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing (niPGT) for chromosome abnormalities in blastocysts reported with a mosaic trophectoderm (TE) biopsy?

SUMMARY ANSWER

niPGT of cell-free DNA in blastocyst culture medium exhibited a good diagnostic performance in putative mosaic blastocysts.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Advances in niPGT have demonstrated the potential reliability of cell-free DNA as a resource for genetic assessment, but information on mosaic embryos is scarce because the mosaicism may interfere with niPGT. In addition, the high incidence of mosaicism reported in the context of PGT and the viability of mosaic blastocysts raise questions about whether mosaicism really exists.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

The study was performed between May 2020 and July 2020. First, clinical data collected by a single-center over a 6-year period on PGT for chromosome aneuploidies (PGT-A) or chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) were analyzed. After confirming the reliability of niPGT, 41 blastocysts classified as mosaics by trophectoderm (TE) biopsy were re-cultured. The chromosomal copy number of the blastocyst embryo (BE, the gold standard), TE re-biopsy, and corresponding cell-free DNA in the culture medium was assessed.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Data on patients enrolled for PGT at a single center from 2014 to 2019 were collected and the cycles with available putative mosaic blastocysts were evaluated. To verify the diagnostic validity of niPGT, eight aneuploid blastocysts were thawed and re-cultured for 14-18 h. The concordance of the niPGT diagnosis results and the whole blastocyst testing results was analyzed. Forty-one blastocysts reported as mosaics from 22 patients were included and re-cultured for 14-18 h. The genetic material of the BE, TE re-biopsy, and corresponding cell-free DNA in the culture medium was amplified using multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycles. The karyotype data from niPGT and TE re-biopsy were compared with that from the whole blastocyst, and the efficiency of niPGT was assessed.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Data on 3738 blastocysts from 785 PGT-A or PGT-SR cycles of 677 patients were collected. According to the TE biopsy report, of the 3662 (98%) successfully amplified samples, 24 (0.6%) yielded no results, 849 (23.2%) were euploid, 2245 (61.3%) were aneuploid, and 544 (14.9%) were mosaic. Sixty patients without euploid blastocysts opted for a single mosaic blastocyst transfer, and 30 (50%) of them obtained a clinical pregnancy. With the BE chromosome copy number as the gold standard, niPGT and TE re-biopsy showed reliable detection ability and diagnostic efficiency in eight putative aneuploid blastocysts. Of the 41 putative mosaic blastocysts re-cultured and re-tested, 35 (85.4%) showed euploid BE results. All but two of the blastocysts previously diagnosed with segmental chromosomal mosaic were actually euploid. In addition, all blastocysts previously classified as low degree (20-50%) mosaics were identified as euploid by BE PGT, whereas four of the six putative high degree (50-80%) mosaic blastocysts showed chromosomal abnormalities. The raw concordance rates of spent culture medium (SCM) and TE re-biopsies compared with BE were 74.4% and 82%, respectively, in terms of overall ploidy and 96.2% and 97.6%, respectively, per single chromosome when considering all degree mosaic results as true positives. However, when we set a mosaicism identification threshold of 50%, the concordance rates of SCM and TE re-biopsies compared with BE were 87.2% and 85% at the overall ploidy level and 98.8% and 98.3% at the chromosomal level, respectively. At the full ploidy level, the sensitivity and false negative rates for niPGT were 100% and 0, respectively. After adjustment of the threshold for mosaicism, the specificity of niPGT increased from 69.7% to 84.8% in terms of overall ploidy and from 96.1% to 98.9% at the chromosomal level.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The primary limitation of this study is the small sample size, which decreases the strength of our conclusions. If possible, identifying the clinical outcome of niPGT on reassessed mosaic blastocysts would be further progress in this field.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This study is the first to explore the practicability of niPGT in diagnostic reassessment of putative mosaicism. The present study provides a novel opportunity for patients with only mosaic blastocysts and no euploid blastocysts, regardless of the technical or biological basis of mosaicism. Employing niPGT after 14-18 h of re-culturing might be a superior option for the best use of blastocysts because of its minimally invasive nature.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was supported by grants from National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFC1002004), the Central Guiding the Science and Technology Development of the Local (2018080802D0081) and College Natural Science Project of Anhui Province (KJ2019A0287). There are no competing interests to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Multiple vitrification-warming and biopsy procedures on human embryos: clinical outcome and neonatal follow-up of children

STUDY QUESTION

Does double vitrification and warming of human blastocysts having undergone biopsy once or twice have an impact on the clinical outcome?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The clinical pregnancy rate obtained with double vitrification single biopsy blastocysts was comparable to that obtained with single vitrification single biopsy blastocysts in our center in the same time period (46%; 2016-2018), whereas that obtained with double-vitrified double-biopsied blastocysts seemed lower and will need further study.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Genetic testing on cryopreserved unbiopsied embryos involves two cryopreservation procedures. Retesting of failed/inconclusive-diagnosed blastocysts inevitably involves a second round of biopsy and a second round of vitrification as well. To what extent this practice impacts on the developmental potential of blastocysts has been studied to a limited extent so far and holds controversy. Additionally, the obstetrical/perinatal outcome after the transfer of double-vitrified/single or double-biopsied blastocysts is poorly documented.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This retrospective observational study included 97 cycles of trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) on vitrified-warmed embryos followed by a second round of vitrification between March 2015 and December 2019.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

In 36 warming cycles, no biopsy was performed on the embryos before the first vitrification (single biopsy group). In 61 warming cycles, the embryos had been biopsied on Day 3 (n = 4) or on Day 5/6 (n = 57) before the first vitrification (double biopsy group). A second biopsy was mostly indicated in cycles of failed or inconclusive diagnosis at the first biopsy. Two cycles involved a more specific mutation test for X-linked diseases on male embryos and one cycle involved testing for a second monogenic indication supplementary to a previously tested reciprocal translocation. Post-warming suitability for biopsy, availability of genetically transferable embryos and clinical outcome of subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles were reported. Neonatal follow-up of the children was included.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In total, 91 cleavage-stage embryos and 154 blastocysts were warmed, of which 34 (37.4%) and 126 (81.8%), respectively, were of sufficient quality to undergo trophectoderm biopsy and were subsequently vitrified for a second time. Out of these, 92 underwent biopsy for the first time (single biopsy), whereas 68 underwent a second biopsy (double biopsy). After diagnosis, 77 blastocysts (48.1%) were revealed to be genetically transferable (44 in the single biopsy group and 33 in the double biopsy group). In 46 warming cycles, 51 blastocysts were warmed and 49 survived this second warming procedure (96.0%). Subsequently, there were 45 FET cycles resulting in 27 biochemical pregnancies and 18 clinical pregnancies with fetal heartbeat (40.0% per FET cycle: 44.0% in the single biopsy group and 35.0% in the double biopsy group, P = 0.54). Thirteen singletons were born (eight in the single biopsy group and five in the double biopsy group), while three pregnancies were ongoing. A total of 26 embryos (13 in each group) remain vitrified and have the potential to increase the final clinical pregnancy rate. The neonatal follow-up of the children born so far is reassuring.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This is a small retrospective cohort, thus, the implantation potential of double vitrification double biopsy blastocysts, as compared to double vitrification single biopsy blastocysts and standard PGT (single vitrification, single biopsy), certainly needs further investigation. Although one could speculate on birthweight being affected by the number of biopsies performed, the numbers in this study are too small to compare birthweight standard deviation scores in singletons born after single or double biopsy.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

PGT on vitrified-warmed embryos, including a second vitrification-warming step, results in healthy live birth deliveries, for both single- and double-biopsied embryos. The neonatal follow-up of the 13 children born so far did not indicate any adverse effect. The present study is important in order to provide proper counseling to couples on their chance of a live birth per initial warming cycle planned and concerning the safety issue of rebiopsy and double vitrification.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

None.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Perceptions, motivations and decision regret surrounding preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy

STUDY QUESTION

Is there a difference in level of decision regret following IVF treatment between those who choose to complete or not complete preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy [PGT-A]?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Approximately one-third of the participants expressed moderate to severe regret (MSR) following their decision to either complete or not complete PGT-A; notably, decision regret was higher in those who chose not to complete PGT-A, primarily driven by significantly higher regret scores in those that experienced a miscarriage after not testing.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Previous research has found that 39% of participants who completed PGT-A expressed some degree of decision regret and that negative clinical outcomes, such as lack of euploid embryos, negative pregnancy test or miscarriage, were associated with a higher level of decision regret. To date, there are no published studies assessing the possible disparity in decision regret surrounding PGT-A in a population of IVF patients that either chose to pursue PGT-A or not.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

An anonymous online survey was distributed to 1583 patients who underwent IVF with or without PGT-A at a single university institution between January 2016 and December 2017. In total, 335 women accessed the survey, 220 met eligibility criteria and 130 completed the full study survey. Six participants were excluded due to refusal of medical record review, and nine participants were excluded after record review due to not meeting eligibility based on cycle start date or completing only embryo banking without attempting transfer. One hundred and fifteen participants were included in the final analysis.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Of the 115 participants included, 55 (48%) completed PGT-A and 60 (52%) did not complete PGT-A. The online survey included four sections: Demographics; Perceptions about PGT-A risks and benefits [scale from 0 (absolutely not true) to 100 (absolutely true)]; Decision-making factors [scale from 0 (not important) to 100 (very important)]; and Brehaut Decision Regret Scale [DRS] [range 0-100, with >25 indicating MSR]. A retrospective chart review was conducted to confirm study eligibility and collect cumulative clinical outcomes of consenting participants who completed the survey.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Demographics of the PGT-A and no PGT-A cohorts were similar, with the majority of respondents being Caucasian or Asian, unaffiliated with any religion and with a graduate or professional degree. The two groups differed significantly in mean age, with the PGT-A group being slightly older (mean ± SD: 37 ± 3.7 versus 36 ± 3.4; P = 0.048), and in rate of miscarriages, with fewer participants in the PGT-A cohort experiencing a miscarriage (5% versus 22%; P = 0.012). The majority of participants in both PGT-A and no PGT-A cohorts strongly believed in the purported benefits of PGT-A, including that it decreases the risk of birth defects (median 82 versus 77; P = 0.046), improves the chances of having a healthy baby (median 89 versus 74; P = 0.002) and selects the best embryo for transfer (median 85 versus 80; P = 0.049). When asked to report their motivating factors for decision-making, both groups cited physician counseling as important (median 70 versus 71; P = 0.671); however, the PGT-A cohort was more strongly motivated by a desire to not transfer abnormal embryos (median 84 versus 53; P = 0.0001). Comparison of DRS score between those who did or did not undergo PGT-A showed significantly higher median DRS score after not completing PGT-A (median 15 versus 0; P = 0.013). There was a significantly higher proportion of participants who did not complete PGT-A that expressed mild (36% versus 16%) and MSR (32% versus 24%) compared to those who completed PGT-A (χ2 = 9.03, df = 2; P = 0.011). Sub-group analyses of DRS scores by outcomes of clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth revealed that the higher DRS score in those not completing PGT-A was driven by a large increase in regret noted by those with history of a miscarriage (median 45 versus 0; P = 0.018). Multivariate logistic regression modeling found no evidence that any specific demographic factor, clinical outcome or perception/motivation surrounding PGT-A was independently predictive of increased risk for MSR.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The retrospective nature of data collection incurs the possibility of sampling and recall bias. As only 59% of eligible respondents completed the full survey, it is possible that mainly those with very positive or negative sentiments following treatment felt compelled to complete their response. This bias, however, would apply to the whole of the population, and not simply to those who did or did not complete PGT-A.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The proportion of participants expressing any degree of decision regret in this PGT-A cohort was 40%, which is comparable to that shown in prior research. This study adds to prior data by also assessing decision regret experienced by those who went through IVF without PGT-A, and showed that 68% expressed some level of regret with their decision-making. These results should not be interpreted to mean that all patients should opt for PGT-A to pre-emptively mitigate their risk of regret. Instead, it suggests that drivers of decision regret are likely multifactorial and unique to the experience of one's personal expectations regarding PGT-A, motivations for pursuing or not pursuing it and resultant clinical outcome. Highlighting the complex nature of regret, these data should encourage physicians to more carefully consider individual patient values toward risk-taking or risk-averse behavior, as well as their own positions regarding PGT-A. Until there are clear recommendations regarding utilization of PGT-A, a strong collaboration between physicians and genetic counselors is recommended to educate patients on the risks and potential benefits of PGT-A in a balanced and individualized manner.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No funding was utilized for study completion and the authors have no competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Complex mosaic blastocysts after preimplantation genetic testing: prevalence and outcomes after re-biopsy and re-vitrification

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the incidence of complex mosaic in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) blastocysts and can it be managed in clinical practice?

DESIGN

A retrospective study of PGT cycles conducted between January 2018 and October 2019 at a single centre. Biopsies of blastocysts were collected and analysed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Complex mosaic blastocysts were defined as those with three or more mosaic chromosomes. The cryopreserved complex mosaic blastocysts underwent a second round of biopsy, NGS analysis and vitrification. The euploid blastocysts identified by the re-biopsy were warmed again for embryo transfer. The main outcomes included the prevalence of the complex mosaic and the ongoing pregnancy rate.

RESULTS

The prevalence of the complex mosaic was 2.4% (437/17,979). The prevalence of the complex mosaic was not associated with maternal age and morphological quality. A total of 89 complex mosaic blastocysts underwent re-biopsy and 96.6% (86/89) survived the first warming. For the re-biopsy samples, 61.6% (53/86) were euploid. The poor-quality blastocysts had higher rates of aneuploidy compared with good-quality blastocysts. The survival rate for blastocysts undergoing the second warming was 100% (18/18) and resulted in an ongoing pregnancy rate of 38.9% (7/18) as well as the birth of six healthy infants.

CONCLUSION

Re-biopsy may rescue blastocysts with development potential for transfer and improve the cumulative pregnancy rate per stimulation cycle in patients containing complex mosaic blastocysts.

Multiple cryopreservation-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, negatively affect IVF outcomes

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do multiple cryopreservation-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, negatively affect IVF outcomes?

DESIGN

Patients undergoing IVF with homologous single embryo transfer, and who underwent trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) between 2013 and 2017, were divided into three groups based on degree of embryonic micromanipulation: once-biopsied, once-cryopreserved (group BC, n = 2603), once-biopsied, twice-cryopreserved (group CBC, n = 95) and twice-biopsied, twice-cryopreserved (group BCBC, n = 15). The primary outcome was live birth; secondary outcomes included positive serum pregnancy test, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage.

RESULTS

Group CBC had a significantly lower chance of live birth (adjusted RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.79) and clinical pregnancy (adjusted RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.85) compared with group BC. Miscarriage rates were similar between groups BC and CBC (adjusted RR 1.3, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple cryopreservation-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, negatively affect IVF outcomes. Although PGT-A is thought to improve reproductive outcomes on a per transfer basis, caution must be exercised in counselling patients on the possibility of diminishing returns owing to further embryonic micromanipulation after an embryo has been cryopreserved.

Successful four-factor preimplantation genetic testing: α- and β-thalassemia, human leukocyte antigen typing, and aneuploidy screening

Our study established an effective next-generation sequencing (NGS) protocol for four-factor preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) using  α- and β-thalassemia, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing, and aneuploidy screening. Three couples, in whom both partners were α- and β-double thalassemia carriers, underwent PGT between 2016 and 2018. These individuals sought an opportunity for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to save their children from β-thalassemia major. A total of 35 biopsied trophectoderm samples underwent multiple displacement amplification (MDA). PGT for α- and β-thalassemia and HLA typing were performed on MDA products using NGS-based single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) haplotyping. Although two samples failed MDA, 94.3% (33/35) of samples were successfully amplified, achieving conclusive PGT results. Furthermore, 51.5% (17/33) of the embryos were diagnosed as unaffected non-carriers or carriers. Of the 17 unaffected embryos, nine (52.9%) were tested further  and identified as euploid via NGS-based aneuploid screening, in which five had HLA types matching affected children. One family did not achieve any unaffected euploid embryos. The two other families transferred HLA-matched and unaffected euploid embryos, resulting in two healthy 'savior babies.' NGS-PGT results were confirmed in prenatal diagnosis. Therefore, NGS-SNP was effective in performing PGT for multipurpose detection within a single PGT cycle.

Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges

Fetal aneuploidies are among the most common causes of miscarriages, perinatal mortality and neurodevelopmental impairment. During the last 70 years, many efforts have been made in order to improve prenatal diagnosis and prenatal screening of these conditions. Recently, the use of cell-free fetal DNA (cff-DNA) testing has been increasingly used in different countries, representing an opportunity for non-invasive prenatal screening of pregnant women. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the state of the art and the main strengths and limitations of this test for prenatal screening of fetal aneuploidies.

The dawn of the future: 30 years from the first biopsy of a human embryo. The detailed history of an ongoing revolution

Following early studies showing no adverse effects, cleavage stage biopsy by zona drilling using acid Tyrode's solution, and removal of single blastomeres for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) and identification of sex in couples at risk of X-linked disease, was performed by Handyside and colleagues in late 1989, and pregnancies reported in 1990. This method was later used for specific diagnosis of monogenic conditions, and a few years later also for chromosomal structural and/or numerical impairments, thereby establishing a valuable alternative option to prenatal diagnosis. This revolutionary approach in clinical embryology spread worldwide, and several other embryo biopsy strategies developed over three decades in a process that is still ongoing. The rationale of this narrative review is to outline the different biopsy approaches implemented across the years in the workflow of the IVF clinics that provided PGT: their establishment, the first clinical experiences, their downsides, evolution, improvement and standardization. The history ends with a glimpse of the future: minimally/non-invasive PGT and experimental embryo micromanipulation protocols. This grand theme review outlines a timeline of the evolution of embryo biopsy protocols, whose implementation is increasing worldwide together with the increasing application of PGT techniques in IVF. It represents a vade mecum especially for the past, present and upcoming operators and experts in this field to (re)live this history from its dawn to its most likely future.

Blastulation rates of sibling oocytes in two IVF culture media: an evidence-based workflow to implement newly commercialized products

RESEARCH QUESTION

An evidence-based novel commercially available continuous IVF culture medium in compliance with an efficient quality-management system is proposed.

DESIGN

Non-interventional study on sibling oocytes. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles among women aged 42 years or younger that used ejaculated spermatozoa and retrieved four to eight oocytes were included. Sibling oocytes were randomized for culture in the novel Geri-medium or continuous single culture medium (CSCM). Primary outcome measure was blastulation rate per cohort of inseminated oocytes; 1182 oocytes were required to outline down to a 7% difference (power = 80%).

RESULTS

A total of 181 cohorts of sibling oocytes were included. Geri-medium (n = 631 oocytes) and CSCM (n = 643 oocytes) resulted in similar blastulation rates (mean ± SD: 42.8% ± 30.1% versus 43.1% ± 29.0%; Wilcoxon signed rank test = 0.77). Blastocysts cultured in the former (n = 275 versus n = 277) showed longer timings during preimplantation development (P < 0.01) and were poorer quality (26% versus 18%; P = 0.03). Euploidy rate was no different in cycles that underwent preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (n = 113) (117/237 [49%] versus 117/249 blastocysts [47%]; P = 0.6). Ongoing implantation rate was comparable in the study arms after euploid (29/47 [63%] versus 14/ 34 [41%]; P = 0.1) or untested (12/31 [39%] versus 7/18 [39%]; P = 0.3) transfers.

CONCLUSION

Blastulation rate among cohorts of sibling oocytes cultured in the same incubator is a fast, reliable and comprehensive performance indicator to validate novel commercially available culture medium. The media tested were considered similarly efficient. The differences in blastocyst morphology and developmental timings warrant further investigation, although euploidy and ongoing implantation rates were similar.

Consistency in rates of diagnosis of embryonic mosaicism, segmental abnormalities, and "no call" results among experienced embryologists performing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether differences exist in rates of subchromosomal abnormalities, mosaicism, and "no call" results among embryologists performing and loading trophectoderm biopsies for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Large infertility center.

PATIENTS

All patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with PGT-A.

INTERVENTIONS

The NexCCS next generation sequencing platform was used for PGT-A. The χ2 testing assessed differences in rates of primary outcomes between embryologists. Intraclass correlation coefficients evaluated inter-embryologist reliability in rates of abnormal and no call results. Median absolute performance difference (MAPD) scores, which quantify the impact of technical variation on analytical performance, were averaged for individual embryologists. Analysis of variance assessed differences in mean MAPD scores.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Interoperator variability in rates of mosaic, segmental, and no call results.

RESULTS

Four embryologists performed 30,899 biopsies and 6 embryologists loaded specimens into designated tubes. Among individuals performing trophectoderm sampling, rates of mosaicism were 4.3% to 6.1%, segmental errors were 9.0% to 10.7%, and inconclusive results were 1.1% to 2.9%. For those loading, the incidence of mosaicism was 4.2% to 5.9%, subchromosomal abnormalities was 9.7% to 10.4%, and no call results was 1.2% to 2.2%. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.978 for embryologists performing biopsies and 0.981 for those loading. Differences in mean MAPD scores were within 0.6% and 0.2% of each other for doing biopsies and loading embryologists, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of mosaicism, segmental, and no call PGT-A results are consistent among experienced embryologists. Due to the large sample size included, differences within 1% of the mean were deemed clinically irrelevant despite statistical significance.

Looking past the appearance: a comprehensive description of the clinical contribution of poor-quality blastocysts to increase live birth rates during cycles with aneuploidy testing

STUDY QUESTION

Which are the clinical benefits and risks of including poor-quality blastocysts (PQBs) in the cohort of biopsied embryos during a cycle with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

PQBs show a worse prognosis with respect to sibling non-PQBs, but their clinical use allows an overall 2.6% increase in the number of live births (LBs) achievable after PGT-A.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

PQBs (<BB according to Gardner and Schoolcraft's classification) are generally disregarded for clinical use and/or research purposes. Therefore, limited data exist in literature to estimate the benefits and risks deriving from the transfer of a PQB. In Italy, the law imposes the transfer or cryopreservation of all embryos, unless proven not viable. This regulation has allowed the production of a large amount of data regarding poor-quality embryos. Previous reports outlined a lower chance of euploidy and implantation for PQBs. Yet, a comprehensive picture of their real clinical contribution is missing.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This observational cohort study including 2757 oocyte retrievals for PGT-A (mean maternal age, 39.6 ± 3.3 years) conducted at a private IVF centre between April 2013 and May 2018. A total of 1497 PQBs were obtained and their embryological, chromosomal and clinical features were compared to 5250 non-PQBs (≥BB according to Gardner and Schoolcraft's classification) and adjusted for all significant confounders. After defining the overall increase in LBs due to PQBs, we outlined the population of patients who might benefit the most from their clinical use.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

ICSI cycles, involving ovarian stimulation, blastocyst culture, trophectoderm biopsy, vitrification, comprehensive chromosome testing and vitrified-warmed euploid single embryo transfers (SETs), were conducted. Overall analyses and sub-analyses in populations of patients clustered according to maternal age at retrieval and size of the cohort of sibling non-PQBs were performed. Finally, the risk of miscarriage and the chance of LB per biopsied PQB and non-PQB were estimated.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

PQBs allowed a 12.4% increase in the cycles where ≥1 blastocyst was biopsied. To date, we report a concurrent 2.6% increase in the cycles resulting in ≥1 LB. On average 0.7 ± 0.9 (range, 0-9) PQBs were obtained per cycle for biopsy, including 0.2 ± 0.4 (range, 0-5) euploid PQBs. Maternal age solely correlates with the prevalence of PQBs from both overall and cycle-based analyses. Indeed, the patients who benefit the most from these embryos (i.e. 18 women achieving their only LBs thanks to PQBs) cluster among women older than 42 years and/or those with no or few sibling non-PQBs (1.1 ± 1.1; range, 0-3). The 1497 PQBs compared to the 5250 non-PQBs showed slower development (Day 5, 10.1% versus 43.9%; Day 6, 60.5% versus 50.8%; Day 7, 29.4% versus 5.2%) and lower euploidy rates (23.5% versus 51%; adjusted OR, 0.36). Among the 195 and 1697 transferred euploid PQBs and non-PQBs, the former involved a lower implantation rate (16.9% versus 52.3%) and a higher miscarriage rate per clinical pregnancy (36.4% versus 13.9%), therefore resulting in a lower LB rate (LBR, 10.8% versus 44.6%; adjusted OR, 0.22). Based on these rates, we estimated an overall 1.5% risk of miscarriage and 2.6% chance of LB after euploid vitrified-warmed SET per each biopsied PQB. The same estimates for non-PQBs were 3.7% and 22.8%.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The clinical benefit of PQBs is underestimated since they are the last option for transfer and this analysis entailed only the first LB. The higher miscarriage rate per clinical pregnancy here reported might be the consequence of a population of patients of poorer prognosis undergoing the SET of euploid PQBs, an option that requires further investigation. Finally, a cost-benefit analysis is needed in a prospective non-selection fashion.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

PQBs show higher aneuploidy rates. If to be included, PGT-A is recommended. When selected against aneuploid-PQBs, euploid ones could still involve a worse prognosis, yet, their LBR is not negligible. Women should be informed that a poor morphology does not define a non-viable embryo per se, although PQBs show a reduced chance of resulting in an LB.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No external funding was used for this study. The authors have no conflict of interest related to this study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review

BACKGROUND

Recently, the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology initiated a clinical study of preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy. There will be a great need for a standardized embryo biopsy technique in Japan. However, the gold standard trophectoderm (TE) biopsy procedure has not been established, and this review outlines the clinical use of TE biopsy.

METHODS

Based on literature, the method and associated techniques for TE biopsy, a dissection method of TE cells from blastocysts, were investigated.

MAIN FINDINGS

Two TE biopsy methods are used, namely assisted hatching (herniating) and non-assisted hatching (direct suction); however, it is not clear which of these methods is superior. It is critical to understand whether the flicking or pulling method is beneficial.

CONCLUSION

Non-assisted hatching biopsy method may cause blastocyst collapse with a higher probability, and it may extend the biopsy time. The biopsy procedure should be performed within 3 minutes, and thus direct TE suction may have greater disadvantages. It is a fact that pulling method of TE dissection with laser pulse is simple; however, excess laser shots may induce a higher frequency of mosaicism. It is important to understand that each technique of TE biopsy has benefits and disadvantages.

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Abnormalities: Aneuploidy, Mosaicism, and Structural Rearrangements

There is a high incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in early human embryos, whether they are generated by natural conception or by assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Cells with chromosomal copy number deviations or chromosome structural rearrangements can compromise the viability of embryos; much of the naturally low human fecundity as well as low success rates of ART can be ascribed to these cytogenetic defects. Chromosomal anomalies are also responsible for a large proportion of miscarriages and congenital disorders. There is therefore tremendous value in methods that identify embryos containing chromosomal abnormalities before intrauterine transfer to a patient being treated for infertility—the goal being the exclusion of affected embryos in order to improve clinical outcomes. This is the rationale behind preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and structural rearrangements (-SR). Contemporary methods are capable of much more than detecting whole chromosome abnormalities (e.g., monosomy/trisomy). Technical enhancements and increased resolution and sensitivity permit the identification of chromosomal mosaicism (embryos containing a mix of normal and abnormal cells), as well as the detection of sub-chromosomal abnormalities such as segmental deletions and duplications. Earlier approaches to screening for chromosomal abnormalities yielded a binary result of normal versus abnormal, but the new refinements in the system call for new categories, each with specific clinical outcomes and nuances for clinical management. This review intends to give an overview of PGT-A and -SR, emphasizing recent advances and areas of active development.

Time of morulation and trophectoderm quality are predictors of a live birth after euploid blastocyst transfer: a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the morphodynamic characterization of a euploid blastocyst's development allows a higher prediction of a live birth after single-embryo-transfer (SET).

DESIGN

Observational cohort study conducted in two phases: training and validation.

SETTING

Private in vitro fertilization centers.

PATIENT(S)

Euploid blastocysts: 511 and 319 first vitrified-warmed SETs from 868 and 546 patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) in the training and validation phase, respectively.

INTERVENTION(S)

Data collected from time of polar body extrusion to time of starting blastulation, and trophectoderm and inner-cell-mass static morphology in all embryos cultured in a specific time-lapse incubator with a continuous medium. Logistic regressions conducted to outline the variables showing a statistically significant association with live birth. In the validation phase, these variables were tested in an independent data set.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Live births per SET.

RESULT(S)

The average live birth rate (LBR) in the training set was 40% (N = 207/511). Only time of morulation (tM) and trophectoderm quality were outlined as putative predictors of live birth at two IVF centers. In the validation set, the euploid blastocysts characterized by tM <80 hours and high-quality trophectoderm resulted in a LBR of 55.2% (n = 37/67), while those with tM ≥ 80 hours and a low-quality trophectoderm resulted in a LBR of 25.5% (N = 13/51).

CONCLUSION(S)

Time of morulation and trophectoderm quality are better predictors of a euploid blastocyst's reproductive competence. Our evidence was reproducible across different centers under specific culture conditions. These data support the crucial role of morulation for embryo development, a stage that involves massive morphologic, cellular, and molecular changes and deserves more investigation.

IUI and uterine lavage of in vivo-produced blastocysts for PGT purposes: is it a technically and ethically reasonable perspective? Is it actually needed?

A recent study by Munné et al. portrayed a protocol to retrieve in vivo produced blastocysts after IUI and uterine lavage for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) purposes. The authors claimed this protocol might represent a reasonable future perspective for patients who do not want to undergo IVF, but still want to be informed about their embryos' genetic/chromosomal defects. Although the intent of making PGT available also to patients who cannot or do not need to undergo IVF is respectable, the value of this study is undermined by severe technical and ethical issues. Munné and colleagues' paper was discussed within the executive committee (i.e., president and vice-president of the society, director and vice-director of the scientific committee, secretariat, and counselors), the special interest group in reproductive genetics, the scientific committee, and the collegio dei probiviri of the Italian Society of Embryology, Reproduction and Research (SIERR). The points raised from this discussion are summarized in this opinion paper.

Incidence, Origin, and Predictive Model for the Detection and Clinical Management of Segmental Aneuploidies in Human Embryos

Despite next-generation sequencing, which now allows for the accurate detection of segmental aneuploidies from in vitro fertilization embryo biopsies, the origin and characteristics of these aneuploidies are still relatively unknown. Using a multifocal biopsy approach (four trophectoderms [TEs] and one inner cell mass [ICM] analyzed per blastocyst; n = 390), we determine the origin of the aneuploidy and the diagnostic predictive value of segmental aneuploidy detection in TE biopsies toward the ICM's chromosomal constitution. Contrary to the prevalent meiotic origin of whole-chromosome aneuploidies, we show that sub-chromosomal abnormalities in human blastocysts arise from mitotic errors in around 70% of cases. As a consequence, the positive-predictive value toward ICM configuration was significantly lower for segmental as compared to whole-chromosome aneuploidies (70.8% versus 97.18%, respectively). In order to enhance the clinical utility of reporting segmental findings in clinical TE biopsies, we have developed and clinically verified a risk stratification model based on a second TE biopsy confirmation and segmental length; this model can significantly improve the prediction of aneuploidy risk in the ICM in over 86% of clinical cases enrolled. In conclusion, we provide evidence of the predominant mitotic origin of segmental aneuploidies in preimplantation embryos and develop a risk stratification model that can help post-test genetic counseling and that facilitates the decision-making process on clinical utilization of these embryos.

Is cell-free DNA in spent embryo culture medium an alternative to embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing? A systematic review

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is increasingly used worldwide. It currently entails the use of invasive techniques, i.e. polar body, blastomere, trophectoderm biopsy or blastocentesis, to obtain embryonic DNA, with major technical limitations and ethical issues. Evidence suggests that invasive PGT can lead to genetic misdiagnosis in the case of embryo mosaicism, and, consequently, to the selection of affected embryos for implantation or to the destruction of healthy embryos. Recently, spent culture medium (SCM) has been proposed as an alternative source of embryonic DNA. An increasing number of studies have reported the detection of cell-free DNA in SCM and highlighted the diagnostic potential of non-invasive SCM-based PGT for assessing the genetic status of preimplantation human embryos obtained by IVF. The reliability of this approach for clinical applications, however, needs to be determined. In this systematic review, published evidence on non-invasive SCM-based PGT is presented, and its current benefits and limitations compared with invasive PGT. Then, ways of optimizing and standardizing procedures for non-invasive SCM-based PGT to prevent technical biases and to improve performance in future studies are discussed. Finally, clinical perspectives of non-invasive PGT are presented and its future applications in reproductive medicine highlighted.

When next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) yields an inconclusive report: diagnostic results and clinical outcomes after re biopsy

PURPOSE

To describe diagnostic results following re-biopsy of blastocysts with inconclusive results on preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and to evaluate the reproductive potential of re-biopsied blastocysts.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all trophectoderm biopsies submitted for PGT-A by a large in vitro fertilization center to a single genetics laboratory from June 2016 to October 2018. PGT-A was performed using next-generation sequencing (NGS). No-result blastocysts that underwent re-biopsy were subsequently classified as euploid, aneuploid, mosaic/segmental, or no-result. Ongoing pregnancy and clinical loss rates were assessed following transfer of re-biopsied blastocysts. Logistic regressions were conducted to account for age and blastocyst morphology.

RESULTS

Of the trophectoderm biopsies submitted for PGT-A, 635/25,199 (2.5%) were categorized as no-result. Those that underwent re-biopsy (n = 250) had a 95.2% diagnostic rate with 140 (56.0%) receiving euploid diagnoses. Thirty-six re-biopsied blastocysts deemed euploid were subsequently transferred, resulting in 18 (50.0%) ongoing pregnancies and 5 (13.9%) clinical losses. After adjusting for age and blastocyst morphology, there remained a lower ongoing pregnancy rate and a trend towards higher clinical loss rate following transfer of a re-biopsied blastocyst. When compared to blastocysts that underwent the same number of vitrification-warming cycles but only one biopsy, there were no differences in outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Failure to obtain an analytical result does not change the probability that a given blastocyst is euploid. Pregnancy outcomes following transfer of re-biopsied blastocysts are favorable, but further data must be accrued for an adequately powered comparison with outcomes after transfer of blastocysts biopsied once.

Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in spent medium may be more reliable than trophectoderm biopsy

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) with trophectoderm (TE) biopsy is widely applied in in vitro fertilization (IVF) to identify aneuploid embryos. However, potential safety concerns regarding biopsy and restrictions to only those embryos suitable for biopsy pose limitations. In addition, embryo mosaicism gives rise to false positives and false negatives in PGT-A because the inner cell mass (ICM) cells, which give rise to the fetus, are not tested. Here, we report a critical examination of the efficacy of noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (niPGT-A) in the spent culture media of human blastocysts by analyzing the cell-free DNA, which reflects ploidy of both the TE and ICM. Fifty-two frozen donated blastocysts with TE biopsy results were thawed; each of their spent culture medium was collected after 24-h culture and analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). niPGT-A and TE-biopsy PGT-A results were compared with the sequencing results of the corresponding embryos, which were taken as true results for aneuploidy reporting. With removal of all corona-cumulus cells, the false-negative rate (FNR) for niPGT-A was found to be zero. By applying an appropriate threshold for mosaicism, both the positive predictive value (PPV) and specificity for niPGT-A were much higher than TE-biopsy PGT-A. Furthermore, the concordance rates for both embryo ploidy and chromosome copy numbers were higher for niPGT-A than TE-biopsy PGT-A. These results suggest that niPGT-A is less prone to errors associated with embryo mosaicism and is more reliable than TE-biopsy PGT-A.

Validation of ART Calculator for Predicting the Number of Metaphase II Oocytes Required for Obtaining at Least One Euploid Blastocyst for Transfer in Couples Undergoing in vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection

This multicenter study evaluated the reliability of the recently published ART calculator for predicting the minimum number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes (MIImin) to obtain at least one euploid blastocyst in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). We used clinical and embryonic retrospective data of 1,464 consecutive infertile couples who underwent IVF/ICSI with the intention to have preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. The validation procedure followed a stepwise approach. Firstly, we assessed the distribution of euploid blastocysts per patient and found that it followed a negative binomial distribution. Secondly, we used generalized linear models and applied the Lasso procedure-including MII oocytes to adjust the data-to select the factors predicting the response variable "euploid blastocyst." Third, a logistic regression model-fit to the binomial response euploid (yes/no) for each MII oocyte-was built using the relevant factors. The observational unit was the "woman" whereas the response was the pair (m, n), where n is the number of retrieved MII oocytes and m the corresponding number of euploid blastocysts. The model was internally validated by randomly splitting the data into training and validation sets. The R-squares (~0.25) and the area under the ROC curve (~0.70) did not differ between the training and validation datasets. Fourth, mathematical equations and the calculated probabilities generated by the validation model were used to determine the MIImin required for obtaining at least one euploid blastocyst according to different success probabilities. Lastly, we compared the fittings generated by the validation model and the ART calculator and assessed the predictive value of the latter using the validation dataset. The fittings were sufficiently close for both the estimated probabilities of blastocyst euploid per MII oocyte (r = 0.91) and MIImin (r = 0.88). The ART calculator positive predictive values, i.e., the frequency of patients with at least one euploid blastocyst among those who achieved the estimated MIImin, were 84.8%, 87.5%, and 90.0% for 70%, 80%, and 90% predicted probabilities of success, respectively. The ART calculator effectively predicts the MIImin needed to achieve at least one euploid blastocyst in individual patients undergoing IVF/ICSI. The prediction tool might be used for counseling and planning IVF/ICSI treatments.