1
|
Wu XB, Wang J, Tang Y, Jiang J, Li XM. Altered intestinal microbiota in children with bronchiolitis. Front Microbiol 2023; 14:1197092. [PMID: 37389334 PMCID: PMC10306280 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1197092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the correlation between the alteration of intestinal microbiota and disease in children with bronchiolitis. Methods Fifty seven children diagnosed with bronchiolitis from January 2020 to January 2022 in our pediatric department were included as the case group, and another 36 normal children were included as the control group. Stool and blood were collected from both groups for high-throughput sequencing, untargeted metabolite detection and ELISA. A mouse model of RSV infection was established to validate the results of clinical case detection. Results Body weight, passive smoking, and a host of other factors were possible as acute bronchiolitis influencing factors in the onset of acute bronchiolitis. The alpha diversity Shannon, Simpson and Pielou's evenness indices were significantly lower in children with acute bronchiolitis than in healthy children with gated levels of Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and genus levels of Clostridium and other short chain fatty acid-producing bacteria. The relative abundance of short-chain fatty acid (SCFAs)-producing bacteria decreased and the abundance of genus-level sphingolipid-producing bacteria Sphingomonas increased; the progression of acute bronchiolitis is likely to be associated with the abundance of Clostridium and Sphingomonas and higher fecal amino acid concentrations, including FF-MAS, L-aspartic acid, thioinosinic acid, picolinic acid; supplementation with Clostridium butyricum significantly alleviated RSV infection-induced lung inflammation. Conclusion The progression of bronchiolitis may be associated with altered intestinal microbiota, decreased SCFAs and elevated sphingolipids metabolism in children. Some fecal bacteria and metabolites may predict the onset of bronchiolitis, and oral administration of Clostridium butyricum may alleviate RSV infection-induced pulmonary inflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-bin Wu
- Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, China
- Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, China
- Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yuan Tang
- Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, China
- Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jing Jiang
- Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, China
- Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xue-mei Li
- Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, China
- Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wong KY, Tan HH, Allen JC, Chan JKY, Ee TX, Chua KH, Liu S, Phoon JWL, Viardot-Foucault V, Nadarajah S, Tan TY. Outcomes and cost analysis of single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer. WOMEN'S HEALTH (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2023; 19:17455057231206312. [PMID: 37899602 PMCID: PMC10617257 DOI: 10.1177/17455057231206312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies had compared single-embryo transfer to double-embryo transfer with cleavage stage embryos and found that while single-embryo transfer was less costly, it was also associated with a lower live birth rate than double-embryo transfer. A single blastocyst transfer has been shown to improve the live birth rate per cycle compared to single-embryo transfer at cleavage stage. OBJECTIVES To compare live birth rates and real costs of elective single-embryo transfer to double-embryo transfer and to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of these two strategies in an unselected pool of women in a single center. DESIGN Retrospective study. METHODS We analyzed data of 4232 women who underwent their first fresh in vitro fertilization/intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with at least two embryos available for transfer in KK Women's and Children's Hospital from 2010 to 2017. RESULTS Five hundred and sixty-four women underwent elective single-embryo transfer and 3668 women underwent double-embryo transfer. One hundred and fifty-six women who failed to achieve a live birth in their fresh elective single-embryo transfer cycle underwent a sequential thaw single-embryo transfer cycle. Live birth rate of fresh elective single-embryo transfer was significantly higher at 41.3% than that of double-embryo transfer at 32.6%. Cumulative live birth rate for sequential elective single-embryo transfer (fresh elective single-embryo transfer + thaw single-embryo transfer) was 47.9%. After accounting for variables which may affect live birth rates such as age and stage of embryo transfer, the odds of achieving a live birth from double-embryo transfer was 24% lower than that from sequential single-embryo transfer, although not statistically significant. For every live birth gained from an elective single-embryo transfer compared to double-embryo transfer, cost savings were S$20,172 per woman. If a woman had to have a sequential single-embryo transfer after a failed single-embryo transfer in her fresh cycle, cost savings were reduced to S$1476 per woman. CONCLUSION Single-embryo transfer is a dominant strategy in an unselected population and adopting it in assisted reproductive treatments (ART) can produce cost savings without compromising on live birth rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ker Yi Wong
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore
| | - Heng Hao Tan
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore
| | - John Carson Allen
- Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - JKY Chan
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore
| | - Tat Xin Ee
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore
| | - Ka-Hee Chua
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore
| | - Shuling Liu
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore
| | | | | | - Sadhana Nadarajah
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore
| | - Tse Yeun Tan
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Keller E, Chambers GM. Valuing infertility treatment: Why QALYs are inadequate, and an alternative approach to cost-effectiveness thresholds. FRONTIERS IN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY 2022; 4:1053719. [PMID: 36619344 PMCID: PMC9822722 DOI: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.1053719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
|
4
|
De Neubourg D, Dancet EAF, Pinborg A. Single-embryo transfer implies quality of care in reproductive medicine. Reprod Biomed Online 2022; 45:899-905. [PMID: 35927209 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
This review appraises evidence on the difference between single- and double-embryo transfer (SET, DET) in assisted reproductive technology (ART) regarding the four healthcare quality dimensions most important to fertility patients and doctors. Regarding safety, not only does DET create the uncontested perinatal risks of twin pregnancies, but compelling evidence has added that singleton pregnancies after a vanishing twin also have poorer perinatal outcomes. SET is as effective as DET, as shown by meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, comparing two cycles of SET versus DET and shown by cumulative live birth rates of entire ART trajectories of up to six cycles. Proposing SET, which is safer than DET and as effective, as the gold standard is not irreconcilable with patient-centred care if patients are thoroughly informed on the reasoning behind the proposition and welcomed to challenge whether it fits their personal values. The cost-efficiency of SET is clearly higher, which has even induced certain countries to start reimbursing ART on the condition that SET is used. In conclusion, SET should be the gold standard offered to all patients. The question is not whether to apply SET but how to apply it in terms of patient selection, patient-centred counselling and coverage of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane De Neubourg
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
| | - Eline A F Dancet
- Leuven University Fertility Clinic - Leuven University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anja Pinborg
- Fertility Clinic, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Reimundo P, Gutiérrez Romero JM, Rodríguez Pérez T, Veiga E. Single-embryo transfer: a key strategy to reduce the risk for multiple pregnancy in assisted human reproduction. ADVANCES IN LABORATORY MEDICINE 2021; 2:179-198. [PMID: 37363329 PMCID: PMC10197809 DOI: 10.1515/almed-2021-0013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/05/2020] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
In the early days of assisted reproductive technology (ART), the main target was achieving gestation. Success rates were low, and multiple embryo transfers became common practice, with multiple pregnancies being 20 times higher than in natural conception. Multiple pregnancy is associated with a higher risk of complications for the mother and the baby than a singleton pregnancy. Added to healthcare costs, multiple pregnancy also involves other costs and psychosocial risks, with a high social and health costs. At present, success rates of assisted human reproduction (AHR) have improved dramatically, partially due to advances in laboratory techniques such as culture of blastocyst-stage embryos and vitrification. Additionally, there is a wide range of counseling, health and economic policies that have demonstrated being effective in increasing single-embryo transfer (SET) practices and reducing multiple pregnancies, which ensures satisfactory success rates. Therefore, single-embryo transfer emerges as the approach of choice for AHR to result in a full-term healthy newborn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pilar Reimundo
- Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction and Andrology, Area of Clinical Biochemistry, Vall d’Hebron Clinical Laboratories, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Tamara Rodríguez Pérez
- Laboratory of Andrology and Assisted Reproduction Techniques, Service of Clinical Biochemistry, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ernesto Veiga
- Unit of Assisted Human Reproduction, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela (CHUS), SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kamath MS, Mascarenhas M, Kirubakaran R, Bhattacharya S. Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 8:CD003416. [PMID: 32827168 PMCID: PMC8094586 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003416.pub5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transfer of more than one embryo during in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) increases multiple pregnancy rates resulting in an increased risk of maternal and perinatal morbidity. Elective single embryo transfer offers a means of minimising this risk, but this potential gain needs to be balanced against the possibility of jeopardising the overall live birth rate (LBR). OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different policies for the number of embryos transferred in infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology cycles. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group specialised register of controlled trials, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to March 2020. We handsearched reference lists of articles and relevant conference proceedings. We also communicated with experts in the field regarding any additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different policies for the number of embryos transferred following IVF or ICSI in infertile women. Studies of fresh or frozen and thawed transfer of one to four embryos at cleavage or blastocyst stage were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias. The primary outcomes were LBR and multiple pregnancy rate. The secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates. We analysed data using risk ratios (RR), Peto odds ratio (Peto OR) and a fixed effect model. MAIN RESULTS We included 17 RCTs in the review (2505 women). The main limitation was inadequate reporting of study methods and moderate to high risk of performance bias due to lack of blinding. A majority of the studies had low numbers of participants. None of the trials compared repeated single embryo transfer (SET) with multiple embryo transfer. Reported results of multiple embryo transfer below refer to double embryo transfer. Repeated single embryo transfer versus multiple embryo transfer in a single cycle Repeated SET was compared with double embryo transfer (DET) in four studies of cleavage-stage transfer. In these studies the SET group received either two cycles of fresh SET (one study) or one cycle of fresh SET followed by one frozen SET (three studies). The cumulative live birth rate after repeated SET may be little or no different from the rate after one cycle of DET (RR 0.95, 95% CI (confidence interval) 0.82 to 1.10; I² = 0%; 4 studies, 985 participants; low-quality evidence). This suggests that for a woman with a 42% chance of live birth following a single cycle of DET, the repeated SET would yield pregnancy rates between 34% and 46%. The multiple pregnancy rate associated with repeated SET is probably reduced compared to a single cycle of DET (Peto OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.21; I² = 0%; 4 studies, 985 participants; moderate-quality evidence). This suggests that for a woman with a 13% risk of multiple pregnancy following a single cycle of DET, the risk following repeated SET would be between 0% and 3%. The clinical pregnancy rate (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.12; I² = 47%; 3 studies, 943 participants; low-quality evidence) after repeated SET may be little or no different from the rate after one cycle of DET. There may be little or no difference in the miscarriage rate between the two groups. Single versus multiple embryo transfer in a single cycle A single cycle of SET was compared with a single cycle of DET in 13 studies, 11 comparing cleavage-stage transfers and three comparing blastocyst-stage transfers.One study reported both cleavage and blastocyst stage transfers. Low-quality evidence suggests that the live birth rate per woman may be reduced in women who have SET in comparison with those who have DET (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.75; I² = 0%; 12 studies, 1904 participants; low-quality evidence). Thus, for a woman with a 46% chance of live birth following a single cycle of DET, the chance following a single cycle of SET would be between 27% and 35%. The multiple pregnancy rate per woman is probably lower in those who have SET than those who have DET (Peto OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.22; I² = 0%; 13 studies, 1952 participants; moderate-quality evidence). This suggests that for a woman with a 15% risk of multiple pregnancy following a single cycle of DET, the risk following a single cycle of SET would be between 2% and 4%. Low-quality evidence suggests that the clinical pregnancy rate may be lower in women who have SET than in those who have DET (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.77; I² = 0%; 10 studies, 1860 participants; low-quality evidence). There may be little or no difference in the miscarriage rate between the two groups. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Although DET achieves higher live birth and clinical pregnancy rates per fresh cycle, the evidence suggests that the difference in effectiveness may be substantially offset when elective SET is followed by a further transfer of a single embryo in fresh or frozen cycle, while simultaneously reducing multiple pregnancies, at least among women with a good prognosis. The quality of evidence was low to moderate primarily due to inadequate reporting of study methods and absence of masking those delivering, as well as receiving the interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohan S Kamath
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Mariano Mascarenhas
- Leeds Fertility, The Leeds Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Seacroft Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Richard Kirubakaran
- Cochrane South Asia, Prof. BV Moses Centre for Evidence-Informed Healthcare and Health Policy, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Zhang Y, Folger SG, Boulet SL, Warner L, Callaghan WM, Barfield WD. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2016. MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT. SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES (WASHINGTON, D.C. : 2002) 2019; 68:1-23. [PMID: 31022165 PMCID: PMC6493873 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6804a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PROBLEM/CONDITION Since the first U.S. infant conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART) was born in 1981, both the use of ART and the number of fertility clinics providing ART services have increased steadily in the United States. ART includes fertility treatments in which eggs or embryos are handled in the laboratory (i.e., in vitro fertilization [IVF] and related procedures). Although the majority of infants conceived through ART are singletons, women who undergo ART procedures are more likely than women who conceive naturally to deliver multiple-birth infants. Multiple births pose substantial risks for both mothers and infants, including obstetric complications, preterm delivery (<37 weeks), and low birthweight (<2,500 g). This report provides state-specific information for the United States (including the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico) on ART procedures performed in 2016 and compares birth outcomes that occurred in 2016 (resulting from ART procedures performed in 2015 and 2016) with outcomes for all infants born in the United States in 2016. PERIOD COVERED 2016. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM In 1995, CDC began collecting data on ART procedures performed in fertility clinics in the United States as mandated by the Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992 (FCSRCA) (Public Law 102-493 [October 24, 1992]). Data are collected through the National ART Surveillance System (NASS), a web-based data collection system developed by CDC. This report includes data from 52 reporting areas (the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico). RESULTS In 2016, a total of 197,706 ART procedures (range: 162 in Wyoming to 24,030 in California) with the intent to transfer at least one embryo were performed in 463 U.S. fertility clinics and reported to CDC. These procedures resulted in 65,964 live-birth deliveries (range: 57 in Puerto Rico to 8,638 in California) and 76,892 infants born (range: 74 in Alaska to 9,885 in California). Nationally, the number of ART procedures performed per 1 million women of reproductive age (15-44 years), a proxy measure of the ART use rate, was 3,075. ART use rates exceeded the national rate in 14 reporting areas (Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Utah, and Virginia). ART use exceeded 1.5 times the national rate in nine states, including three (Illinois, Massachusetts, and New Jersey) that also had comprehensive mandated health insurance coverage for ART procedures (i.e., coverage for at least four oocyte retrievals). Nationally, among ART transfer procedures for patients using fresh embryos from their own eggs, the average number of embryos transferred increased with increasing age (1.5 among women aged <35 years, 1.7 among women aged 35-37 years, and 2.2 among women aged >37 years). Among women aged <35 years, the national elective single-embryo transfer (eSET) rate was 42.7% (range: 8.3% in North Dakota to 83.9% in Delaware). In 2016, ART contributed to 1.8% of all infants born in the United States (range: 0.3% in Puerto Rico to 4.7% in Massachusetts). ART also contributed to 16.4% of all multiple-birth infants, including 16.2% of all twin infants and 19.4% of all triplets and higher-order infants. ART-conceived twins accounted for approximately 96.5% (21,455 of 22,233) of all ART-conceived infants born in multiple deliveries. The percentage of multiple-birth infants was higher among infants conceived with ART (31.5%) than among all infants born in the total birth population (3.4%). Approximately 30.4% of ART-conceived infants were twins and 1.1% were triplets and higher-order infants. Nationally, infants conceived with ART contributed to 5.0% of all low birthweight (<2,500 g) infants. Among ART-conceived infants, 23.6% had low birthweight compared with 8.2% among all infants. ART-conceived infants contributed to 5.3% of all preterm (gestational age <37 weeks) infants. The percentage of preterm births was higher among infants conceived with ART (29.9%) than among all infants born in the total birth population (9.9%). The percentage of ART-conceived infants who had low birthweight was 8.7% among singletons, 54.9% among twins, and 94.9% among triplets and higher-order multiples; the corresponding percentages among all infants born were 6.2% among singletons, 55.4% among twins, and 94.6% among triplets and higher-order multiples. The percentage of ART-conceived infants who were born preterm was 13.7% among singletons, 64.2% among twins, and 97.0% among triplets and higher-order infants; the corresponding percentages among all infants were 7.8% for singletons, 59.9% for twins, and 97.7% for triplets and higher-order infants. INTERPRETATION Multiple births from ART contributed to a substantial proportion of all twins, triplets, and higher-order infants born in the United States. For women aged <35 years, who typically are considered good candidates for eSET, on average, 1.5 embryos were transferred per ART procedure, resulting in higher multiple birth rates than could be achieved with single-embryo transfers. Of the four states (Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Rhode Island) with comprehensive mandated health insurance coverage, three (Illinois, Massachusetts, and New Jersey) had rates of ART use >1.5 times the national average. Although other factors might influence ART use, insurance coverage for infertility treatments accounts for some of the difference in per capita ART use observed among states because most states do not mandate any coverage for ART treatment. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION Twins account for almost all of ART-conceived multiple births born in multiple deliveries. Reducing the number of embryos transferred and increasing use of eSET, when clinically appropriate, could help reduce multiple births and related adverse health consequences for both mothers and infants. Because multiple-birth infants are at increased risk for numerous adverse sequelae that cannot be ascertained from the data collected through NASS alone, long-term follow-up of ART infants through integration of existing maternal and infant health surveillance systems and registries with data available from NASS might be useful for monitoring adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saswati Sunderam
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Dmitry M. Kissin
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Yujia Zhang
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Suzanne G. Folger
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | | | - Lee Warner
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - William M. Callaghan
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Wanda D. Barfield
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Meldrum DR, Adashi EY, Garzo VG, Gleicher N, Parinaud J, Pinborg A, Van Voorhis B. Prevention of in vitro fertilization twins should focus on maximizing single embryo transfer versus twins are an acceptable complication of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2018; 109:223-229. [PMID: 29447664 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David R Meldrum
- Reproductive Partners San Diego, San Diego, California; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of California, San Diego, California.
| | - Eli Y Adashi
- Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - V Gabriel Garzo
- Reproductive Partners San Diego, San Diego, California; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of California, San Diego, California
| | | | - Jean Parinaud
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Paule de Viguier Hospital, Toulouse Teaching Hospital Group, Toulouse, France
| | - Anja Pinborg
- Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Brad Van Voorhis
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford SB, Folger SG, Boulet SL, Warner L, Barfield WD. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2015. MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT. SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES (WASHINGTON, D.C. : 2002) 2018; 67:1-28. [PMID: 29447147 PMCID: PMC5829941 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6703a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
PROBLEM/CONDITION Since the first U.S. infant conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART) was born in 1981, both the use of ART and the number of fertility clinics providing ART services have increased steadily in the United States. ART includes fertility treatments in which eggs or embryos are handled in the laboratory (i.e., in vitro fertilization [IVF] and related procedures). Although the majority of infants conceived through ART are singletons, women who undergo ART procedures are more likely than women who conceive naturally to deliver multiple-birth infants. Multiple births pose substantial risks for both mothers and infants, including obstetric complications, preterm delivery (<37 weeks), and low birthweight (<2,500 g) infants. This report provides state-specific information for the United States (including the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico) on ART procedures performed in 2015 and compares birth outcomes that occurred in 2015 (resulting from ART procedures performed in 2014 and 2015) with outcomes for all infants born in the United States in 2015. PERIOD COVERED 2015. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM In 1995, CDC began collecting data on ART procedures performed in fertility clinics in the United States as mandated by the Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992 (FCSRCA) (Public Law 102-493 [October 24, 1992]). Data are collected through the National ART Surveillance System, a web-based data collection system developed by CDC. This report includes data from 52 reporting areas (the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico). RESULTS In 2015, a total of 182,111 ART procedures (range: 135 in Alaska to 23,198 in California) with the intent to transfer at least one embryo were performed in 464 U.S. fertility clinics and reported to CDC. These procedures resulted in 59,334 live-birth deliveries (range: 55 in Wyoming to 7,802 in California) and 71,152 infants born (range: 68 in Wyoming to 9,176 in California). Nationally, the number of ART procedures performed per 1 million women of reproductive age (15-44 years), a proxy measure of the ART utilization rate, was 2,832. ART use exceeded the national rate in 13 reporting areas (California, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Virginia). Nationally, among ART transfer procedures in patients using fresh embryos from their own eggs, the average number of embryos transferred increased with increasing age of the woman (1.6 among women aged <35 years, 1.8 among women aged 35-37 years, and 2.3 among women aged >37 years). Among women aged <35 years, the national elective single-embryo transfer (eSET) rate was 34.7% (range: 11.3% in Puerto Rico to 88.1% in Delaware). In 2015, ART contributed to 1.7% of all infants born in the United States (range: 0.3% in Puerto Rico to 4.5% in Massachusetts). ART also contributed to 17.0% of all multiple-birth infants, 16.8% of all twin infants, and 22.2% of all triplets and higher-order infants. The percentage of multiple-birth infants was higher among infants conceived with ART (35.3%) than among all infants born in the total birth population (3.4%). Approximately 34.0% of ART-conceived infants were twins and 1.0% were triplets and higher-order infants. Nationally, infants conceived with ART contributed to 5.1% of all low birthweight infants. Among ART-conceived infants, 25.5% had low birthweight, compared with 8.1% among all infants. ART-conceived infants contributed to 5.3% of all preterm (gestational age <37 weeks) infants. The percentage of preterm births was higher among infants conceived with ART (31.2%) than among all infants born in the total birth population (9.7%). Among singletons, the percentage of ART-conceived infants who had low birthweight was 8.7% compared with 6.4% among all infants born. The percentage of ART-conceived infants who were born preterm was 13.4% among singletons compared with 7.9% among all infants. INTERPRETATION Multiple births from ART contributed to a substantial proportion of all twins, triplets, and higher-order infants born in the United States. For women aged <35 years, who are typically considered good candidates for eSET, the national average of 1.6 embryos was transferred per ART procedure. Of the four states (Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Rhode Island) with comprehensive mandated health insurance coverage for ART procedures (i.e., coverage for at least four cycles of IVF), three (Illinois, Massachusetts, and New Jersey) had rates of ART use exceeding 1.5 times the national rate. This type of mandated insurance coverage has been associated with greater use of ART and likely accounts for some of the difference in per capita ART use observed among states. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION Twins account for the majority of ART-conceived multiple births. Reducing the number of embryos transferred and increasing use of eSET when clinically appropriate could help reduce multiple births and related adverse health consequences for both mothers and infants. State-based surveillance of ART might be useful for monitoring and evaluating maternal and infant health outcomes of ART in states with high ART use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saswati Sunderam
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Dmitry M. Kissin
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Sara B. Crawford
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Suzanne G. Folger
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Sheree L. Boulet
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Lee Warner
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Wanda D. Barfield
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
For the purpose of reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity, elective single transfer (eSET) in in vitro fertilization (IVF) was first proposed in 1999. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent oral debate between a proponent and an opponent of expanded eSET utilization in an attempt to determine whether a blanket eSET policy, as is increasingly considered, is defensible. While eSET is preferable when possible, and agreed upon by provider and patient, selective double embryo transfer (DET) must be seriously entertained if deemed more appropriate or is desired by the patient. Patient autonomy, let alone prolonged infertility and advancing age, demand nothing less. Importantly, IVF-generated twins represent only 15.7% of the national twin birth rate in the United States. Non-IVF fertility treatments have been identified as the main cause of all multiple births for quite some time. However, educational and regulatory efforts over the last decade, paradoxically, have exclusively only been directed at the practice of IVF, although IVF patient populations are rapidly aging. It is difficult to understand why non-IVF fertility treatments, usually applied to younger women, have so far escaped attention. This debate on eSET utilization in association with IVF may contribute to a redirection of priorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eli Y Adashi
- Professor of Medical Science, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Norbert Gleicher
- Medical Director and Chief Scientist, The Center for Human Reproduction, New York, NY, USA
- President, The Foundation for Reproductive Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Professor (Adj.), Stem Cell Biology and Molecular Embryology Laboratory, Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
- Professor (Adj.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vienna University School of Medicine, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford SB, Folger SG, Jamieson DJ, Warner L, Barfield WD. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2014. MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT. SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES (WASHINGTON, D.C. : 2002) 2017; 66:1-24. [PMID: 28182605 PMCID: PMC5829717 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6606a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
PROBLEM/CONDITION Since the first U.S. infant conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART) was born in 1981, both the use of ART and the number of fertility clinics providing ART services have increased steadily in the United States. ART includes fertility treatments in which eggs or embryos are handled in the laboratory (i.e., in vitro fertilization [IVF] and related procedures). Women who undergo ART procedures are more likely than women who conceive naturally to deliver multiple-birth infants. Multiple births pose substantial risks to both mothers and infants, including obstetric complications, preterm delivery, and low birthweight infants. This report provides state-specific information for the United States (including the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico) on ART procedures performed in 2014 and compares birth outcomes that occurred in 2014 (resulting from ART procedures performed in 2013 and 2014) with outcomes for all infants born in the United States in 2014. PERIOD COVERED 2014. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM In 1996, CDC began collecting data on ART procedures performed in fertility clinics in the United States as mandated by the Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992 (FCSRCA) (Public Law 102-493). Data are collected through the National ART Surveillance System (NASS), a web-based data collection system developed by CDC. This report includes data from 52 reporting areas (the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico). RESULTS In 2014, a total of 169,568 ART procedures (range: 124 in Wyoming to 21,018 in California) with the intent to transfer at least one embryo were performed in 458 U.S. fertility clinics and reported to CDC. These procedures resulted in 56,028 live-birth deliveries (range: 52 in Wyoming to 7,230 in California) and 68,782 infants born (range: 64 in Wyoming to 8,793 in California). Nationally, the total number of ART procedures performed per million women of reproductive age (15-44 years), a proxy measure of the ART usage rate, was 2,647 (range: 364 in Puerto Rico to 6,726 in Massachusetts). ART use exceeded the national average in 13 reporting areas (Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Virginia). Eight reporting areas (Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York) had rates of ART use exceeding 1.5 times the national average. Nationally, among ART transfer procedures in patients using fresh embryos from their own eggs, the average number of embryos transferred increased with increasing age of the woman (1.7 among women aged <35 years, 1.9 among women aged 35-37 years, and 2.3 among women aged >37 years). Among women aged <35 years, who typically are considered to be good candidates for elective single embryo transfer (eSET) procedures, the national eSET rate was 28.5% (range: 4.3% in Puerto Rico to 67.9% in Delaware). In 2014, ART contributed to 1.6% of all infants born in the United States (range: 0.4% in Puerto Rico to 4.7% in Massachusetts) and 18.3% of all multiple-birth infants (range: 5.5% in Alaska and West Virginia to 37.3% in Hawaii), including 18.0% of all twin infants (range: 5.2% in some states to 36.2% in Hawaii) and 26.4% of all triplets and higher-order infants (range: 0% in some states to 65.2% in Hawaii). Percentages of live births that were multiple-birth deliveries were higher among infants conceived with ART (39.4%; range: 11.5% in Delaware to 55.6% in Puerto Rico) than among all infants born in the total birth population (3.5%; range: 2.2% in Puerto Rico to 4.4% in New Jersey). Approximately 38.0% of ART-conceived infants were twin infants, and 2.0% were triplets and higher-order infants. ART-conceived twins accounted for approximately 95.3% of all ART-conceived infants born in multiple deliveries. Nationally, infants conceived with ART contributed to 5.5% of all low birthweight (<2,500 g) infants (range: 1.2% in West Virginia to 14.2% in Massachusetts). Among ART-conceived infants, 27.8% were low birthweight (range: 10.6% in Delaware to 44.4% in Puerto Rico), compared with 8.0% among all infants (range: 5.9% in Alaska to 11.3% in Mississippi). ART-conceived infants contributed to 4.7% of all preterm (<37 weeks) infants (range: 1.2% in Puerto Rico to 13.4% in Massachusetts). Percentages of preterm births were higher among infants conceived with ART (33.2%; range: 18.9% in the District of Columbia to 45.9% in Puerto Rico) than among all infants born in the total birth population (11.3%; range: 8.5% in California to 16.0% in Mississippi). The percentage of ART-conceived infants who were low birthweight was 8.9% (range: 3.2% in some states to 16.1% in Vermont) among singletons and 55.2% (range: 38.5% in Delaware to 77.8% in Alaska) among twins; the corresponding percentages of low birthweight infants among all infants born were 6.3% for singletons (range: 4.6% in Alaska, North Dakota, and Oregon to 9.5% in Puerto Rico) and 55.2% for twins (range: 46.1% in Alaska to 65.6% in Mississippi). The percentage of ART-conceived infants who were preterm was 13.2% (range: 7.5% in Rhode Island to 23.4% in West Virginia) among singletons and 62.2% (range: 33.3% in some states to 81.4% in Mississippi) among twins; the corresponding percentages of preterm infants among all infants were 9.7% for singletons (range: 1.7% in the District of Columbia to 14.2% in Mississippi) and 56.6% for twins (range: 47.2% in Vermont to 66.9% in Wyoming). INTERPRETATION The percentage of infants conceived with ART varied considerably by reporting area. Multiple births from ART contributed to a substantial proportion of all twins, triplets, and higher-order infants born. Low birthweight and preterm infant birth rates were disproportionately higher among ART-conceived infants than among the overall birth population. Although women aged <35 years are typically considered good candidates for eSET, on average two embryos were transferred per ART procedure with women in this group. Compared with ART-conceived singletons, ART-conceived twins were approximately five times more likely to be born preterm and approximately six times more likely to be born with low birthweight. Singleton infants conceived with ART had higher percentages of preterm birth and low birthweight than all singleton infants born in the United States. ART use per population unit was geographically variable, with 13 reporting areas showing ART use higher than the national rate. Of the four states (Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Rhode Island) with comprehensive statewide-mandated health insurance coverage for ART procedures (i.e., coverage for at least four cycles of IVF), three (Illinois, Massachusetts, and New Jersey) had rates of ART use exceeding 1.5 times the national rate. This type of mandated insurance has been associated with greater use of ART and likely accounts for some of the difference in per capita ART use observed among states. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION Reducing the number of embryos transferred and increasing use of eSET when clinically appropriate could help reduce multiple births and related adverse health consequences. Because twins account for the majority of ART-conceived multiple births, improved provider practices and patient education and counseling on the maternal and infant health risks of having twins are needed. Although ART contributes to high percentages of multiple births, other factors not investigated in this report (e.g., delayed childbearing and use of non-ART fertility treatments) also contribute to multiple births and warrant further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saswati Sunderam
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Dmitry M. Kissin
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Sara B. Crawford
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Suzanne G. Folger
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Denise J. Jamieson
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Lee Warner
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Wanda D. Barfield
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
van Heesch MMJ, van Asselt ADI, Evers JLH, van der Hoeven MAHBM, Dumoulin JCM, van Beijsterveldt CEM, Bonsel GJ, Dykgraaf RHM, van Goudoever JB, Koopman-Esseboom C, Nelen WLDM, Steiner K, Tamminga P, Tonch N, Torrance HL, Dirksen CD. Cost-effectiveness of embryo transfer strategies: a decision analytic model using long-term costs and consequences of singletons and multiples born as a consequence of IVF. Hum Reprod 2016; 31:2527-2540. [PMID: 27907897 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2014] [Revised: 05/21/2016] [Accepted: 06/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What is the cost-effectiveness of elective single embryo transfer (eSET) versus double embryo transfer (DET) strategies from a societal perspective, when applying a time horizon of 1, 5 and 18 years? SUMMARY ANSWER From a short-term perspective (1 year) it is cost-effective to replace DET with single embryo transfer; however when intermediate- (5 years) and long-term (18 years) costs and consequences are incorporated, DET becomes the most cost-effective strategy, given a ceiling ratio of €20 000 per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN According to previous cost-effectiveness research into embryo transfer strategies, DET is considered cost-effective if society is willing to pay around €20 000 for an extra live birth. However, interpretation of those studies is complicated, as those studies fail to incorporate long-term costs and outcomes and used live birth as a measure of effectiveness instead of QALYs. With this outcome, both multiple and singletons were valued as one live birth, whereas costs of all children of a multiple were incorporated. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A Markov model (cycle length: 1 year; time horizon: 1, 5 and 18 years) was developed comparing a maximum of: (i) three cycles of eSET in all patients; (ii) four cycles of eSET in all patients; (iii) five cycles of eSET in all patients; (iv) three cycles of standard treatment policy (STP), i.e. eSET in women <38 years with a good quality embryo, and DET in all other women; and (v) three cycles of DET in all patients. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Expected life years (LYs), child QALYs and costs were estimated for all comparators. Input parameters were derived from a retrospective cohort study, in which hospital resource data were collected (n=580) and a parental questionnaire was sent out (431 respondents). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (5000 iterations) was performed. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE With a time horizon of 18 years, DETx3 is most effective (0.54 live births, 10.2 LYs and 9.8 QALYs) and expensive (€37 871) per couple starting IVF. Three cycles of eSET are least effective (0.43 live births, 7.1 LYs and 6.8 QALYs) and expensive (€25 563). We assumed that society is willing to pay €20 000 per QALY gained. With a time horizon of 1 year, eSETx3 was the most cost-effective embryo transfer strategy with a probability of being cost-effective of 99.9%. With a time horizon of 5 or 18 years, DETx3 was most cost-effective, with probabilities of being cost-effective of 77.3 and 93.2%, respectively. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This is the first study to use QALYs generated by the children in the economic evaluation of embryo transfer strategies. There remains some disagreement on whether QALYs generated by new life should be used in economic evaluations of fertility treatment. A further limitation is that treatment ends when it results in live birth and that only child QALYs were considered as measure of effectiveness. The results for the time horizon of 18 years might be less solid, as the data beyond the age of 8 years are based on extrapolation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The current Markov model indicates that when child QALYs are used as measure of outcome it is not cost-effective on the long term to replace DET with single embryo transfer strategies. However, for a balanced approach, a family-planning perspective would be preferable, including additional treatment cycles for couples who wish to have another child. Furthermore, the analysis should be extended to include QALYs of family members. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS This study was supported by a research grant (grant number 80-82310-98-09094) from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw). There are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M M J van Heesch
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A D I van Asselt
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J L H Evers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - M A H B M van der Hoeven
- Department of Neonatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J C M Dumoulin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - C E M van Beijsterveldt
- Department of Biological Psychology, VU University, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G J Bonsel
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Division of Woman and Baby, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R H M Dykgraaf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J B van Goudoever
- Department of Pediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pediatrics, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Koopman-Esseboom
- Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85090, 3508 AB Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - W L D M Nelen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - K Steiner
- Department of Neonatology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - P Tamminga
- Department of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N Tonch
- Academic Medical Center, Center of Reproductive Medicine, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H L Torrance
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85090, 3508 AB Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C D Dirksen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford SB, Folger SG, Jamieson DJ, Warner L, Barfield WD. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance -
United States, 2013. MMWR. SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES : MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT. SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES 2015; 64:1-25. [PMID: 26633040 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6411a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PROBLEM/CONDITION Since the first U.S. infant conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART) was born in 1981, both the use of ART and the number of fertility clinics providing ART services have increased steadily in the United States. ART includes fertility treatments in which eggs or embryos are handled in the laboratory (i.e., in vitro fertilization [IVF] and related procedures). Women who undergo ART procedures are more likely than women who conceive naturally to deliver multiple-birth infants. Multiple births pose substantial risks to both mothers and infants, including obstetric complications, preterm delivery, and low birthweight infants. This report provides state-specific information for the United States (including Puerto Rico) on ART procedures performed in 2013 and compares infant outcomes that occurred in 2013 (resulting from ART procedures performed in 2012 and 2013) with outcomes for all infants born in the United States in 2013. REPORTING PERIOD COVERED 2013. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM In 1996, CDC began collecting data on ART procedures performed in fertility clinics in the United States as mandated by the Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992 (FCSRCA) (Public Law 102-493). Data are collected through the National ART Surveillance System (NASS), a web-based data collection system developed by CDC. This report includes data from 52 reporting areas (the 50 states, the District of Columbia [DC], and Puerto Rico). RESULTS In 2013, a total of 160,521 ART procedures (range: 109 in Wyoming to 20,299 in California) with the intent to transfer at least one embryo were performed in 467 U.S. fertility clinics and were reported to CDC. These procedures resulted in 53,252 live-birth deliveries (range: 47 in Alaska to 6,979 in California) and 66,691 infants (range: 61 in Alaska to 8,649 in California). Nationally, the total number of ART procedures performed per million women of reproductive age (15-44 years), a proxy measure of the ART usage rate, was 2,521 (range: 352 in Puerto Rico to 7,688 in DC). ART use exceeded the national rate in 13 reporting areas (California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Virginia, and DC). Nationally, among ART transfer procedures in patients using fresh embryos from their own eggs, the average number of embryos transferred increased with increasing age of the woman (1.8 among women aged <35 years, 2.0 among women aged 35-37 years, and 2.5 among women aged >37 years). Among women aged <35 years, who typically are considered to be good candidates for elective single embryo transfer (eSET) procedures, the national eSET rate was 21.4% (range: 4.0% in Idaho to 77.5% in Delaware). In 2013, ART contributed to 1.6% of all infants born in the United States (range: 0.2% in Puerto Rico to 4.8% in Massachusetts) and 18.7% of all multiple-birth infants (range: 4.5% in Puerto Rico to 35.7% in Massachusetts), including 18.5% of all twin infants (range: 4.5% in Mississippi to 35.3% in Massachusetts) and 25.2% of all triplet and higher-order infants (range: 0% in several reporting areas to 51.5% in New Jersey). Multiple-birth deliveries were higher among infants conceived with ART (41.1%; range: 20.4% in Delaware to 61.6% in Wyoming) than among all infants born in the total birth population (only 3.5%; range: 1.8% in Puerto Rico to 4.5% in Massachusetts and New Jersey). Approximately 39% of ART-conceived infants were twin infants, and 2% were triplet and higher-order infants. ART-conceived twins accounted for approximately 95.4% of all ART-conceived infants born in multiple deliveries. Nationally, infants conceived with ART contributed to 5.8% of all low birthweight (<2,500 grams) infants (range: 0.9% in Puerto Rico to 15.1% in Massachusetts). Among ART-conceived infants, 29.1% were low birthweight (range: 18.3% in Delaware to 42.6% in Louisiana), compared with 8.0% among all infants (range: 5.8% in Alaska to 11.5% in Mississippi). ART-conceived infants contributed to 4.6% of all preterm (<37 weeks) infants (range: 0.6% in Puerto Rico to 13.3% in Massachusetts). Preterm birth rates were higher among infants conceived with ART (33.6%; range: 22.3% in DC to 50.7% in Louisiana) than among all infants born in the total birth population (11.4%; range: 8.8% in California to 16.6% in Mississippi). The percentage of ART-conceived infants who were low birthweight was 9.0% (range: 5.1% in Mississippi to 19.7% in Puerto Rico) among singletons and 56.3% (range: 48.3% in Maine to 72.4% in Puerto Rico) among twins; the corresponding percentages among all infants born were 6.3% for singletons (range: 4.6% in Alaska to 9.6% in Mississippi and Puerto Rico) and 55.3% for twins (range: 43.6% in Alaska to 65.6% in Mississippi). The percentage of ART-conceived infants who were preterm varied from 13.3% (range: 8.7% in Rhode Island to 26.9% in West Virginia) among singletons to 61.0% (range: 47.8% in DC to 78.8% in Oklahoma) among twins; the corresponding percentages among all infants were 10.1% for singletons (range: 6.8% in Vermont to 14.8% in Mississippi) and 56.6% for twins (range: 44.7% in New Hampshire to 68.9% in Louisiana). INTERPRETATION The percentage of infants conceived with ART varied considerably by reporting area. In most reporting areas, multiple births from ART contributed to a substantial proportion of all twins, triplets, and higher-order infants born, and the low birthweight and preterm infant birth rates were disproportionately higher among ART-conceived infants than among the overall birth population. Although women aged <35 years are typically considered good candidates for eSET, on average two embryos were transferred per ART procedure with women in this group, increasing the overall multiple-birth rates in the United States. Compared with ART-conceived singletons, ART-conceived twins were approximately four-and-a-half times more likely to be born preterm, and approximately six times more likely to be born with low birthweight. Singleton infants conceived with ART had slightly higher rates of preterm delivery and low birthweight than all singleton infants born in the United States. ART use per population unit was geographically variable, with 13 reporting areas showing ART use above the national rate. Of the four states (Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Rhode Island) with comprehensive statewide-mandated health insurance coverage for ART procedures (i.e., coverage for at least four cycles of IVF), two states (Massachusetts and New Jersey) had rates of ART use exceeding twice the national level. This type of mandated insurance has been associated with greater use of ART and likely accounts for some of the difference in per capita ART use observed among states. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTIONS Reducing the number of embryos transferred per ART procedure and increasing use of eSET, when clinically appropriate (typically for women aged <35 years), could help reduce multiple births, particularly ART-conceived twin infants, and related adverse consequences of ART. Because twins account for the majority of ART-conceived multiple births, improved patient education and counseling on the maternal and infant health risks of having twins is needed. Although ART contributes to high rates of multiple births, other factors not investigated in this report (e.g., delayed childbearing and non-ART fertility treatments) also contribute to multiple births and warrant further study.
Collapse
|
14
|
Crawford S, Boulet SL, Mneimneh AS, Perkins KM, Jamieson DJ, Zhang Y, Kissin DM. Costs of achieving live birth from assisted reproductive technology: a comparison of sequential single and double embryo transfer approaches. Fertil Steril 2015; 105:444-50. [PMID: 26604068 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2015] [Revised: 09/30/2015] [Accepted: 10/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess treatment and pregnancy/infant-associated medical costs and birth outcomes for assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles in a subset of patients using elective double embryo (ET) and to project the difference in costs and outcomes had the cycles instead been sequential single ETs (fresh followed by frozen if the fresh ET did not result in live birth). DESIGN Retrospective cohort study using 2012 and 2013 data from the National ART Surveillance System. SETTING Infertility treatment centers. PATIENT(S) Fresh, autologous double ETs performed in 2012 among ART patients younger than 35 years of age with no prior ART use who cryopreserved at least one embryo. INTERVENTION(S) Sequential single and double ETs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Actual live birth rates and estimated ART treatment and pregnancy/infant-associated medical costs for double ET cycles started in 2012 and projected ART treatment and pregnancy/infant-associated medical costs if the double ET cycles had been performed as sequential single ETs. RESULT(S) The estimated total ART treatment and pregnancy/infant-associated medical costs were $580.9 million for 10,001 double ETs started in 2012. If performed as sequential single ETs, estimated costs would have decreased by $195.0 million to $386.0 million, and live birth rates would have increased from 57.7%-68.0%. CONCLUSION(S) Sequential single ETs, when clinically appropriate, can reduce total ART treatment and pregnancy/infant-associated medical costs by reducing multiple births without lowering live birth rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Crawford
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - Sheree L Boulet
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Allison S Mneimneh
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kiran M Perkins
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Denise J Jamieson
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Yujia Zhang
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Dmitry M Kissin
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Economic aspects of infertility care: a challenge for researchers and clinicians: Figure 1. Hum Reprod 2015; 30:2243-8. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2015] [Accepted: 06/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
16
|
Wilkinson D, Schaefer GO, Tremellen K, Savulescu J. Double trouble: should double embryo transfer be banned? THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOETHICS 2015; 36:121-139. [PMID: 25813034 DOI: 10.1007/s11017-015-9324-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
What role should legislation or policy play in avoiding the complications of in-vitro fertilization? In this article, we focus on single versus double embryo transfer, and assess three arguments in favour of mandatory single embryo transfer: risks to the mother, risks to resultant children, and costs to society. We highlight significant ethical concerns about each of these. Reproductive autonomy and non-paternalism are strong enough to outweigh the health concerns for the woman. Complications due to non-identity cast doubt on the extent to which children are harmed. Twinning may offer an overall benefit rather than burden to society. Finally, including the future health costs for children (not yet born) in reproductive policy is inconsistent with other decisions. We conclude that mandatory single embryo transfer is not justified and that a number of countries should reconsider their current embryo transfer policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominic Wilkinson
- Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Suite 8, Littlegate House, St Ebbes St, Oxford, OX1 1PT, UK,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fugel HJ, Connolly M, Nuijten M. An economic assessment of embryo diagnostics (Dx) - the costs of introducing non-invasive embryo diagnostics into IVF standard treatment practices. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14:482. [PMID: 25298235 PMCID: PMC4282199 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2013] [Accepted: 09/29/2014] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background New techniques in assessing oocytes and embryo quality are currently explored to improve pregnancy and delivery rates per embryo transfer. While a better understanding of embryo quality could help optimize the existing “in vitro fertilization” (IVF) therapy schemes, it is essential to address the economic viability of such technologies in the healthcare setting. Methods An Embryo-Dx economic model was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness of 3 different IVF strategies from a payer’s perspective; it compares Embryo-Dx with single embryo transfer (SET) to elective single embryo transfer (eSET) and to double embryo transfer (DET) treatment practices. Results The introduction of a new non-invasive embryo technology (Embryo-Dx) associated with a cost up to €460 is cost-effective compared to eSET and DET based on the cost per live birth. The model assumed that Embryo-Dx will improve ongoing pregnancy rate/realize an absolute improvement in live births of 9% in this case. Conclusions This study shows that improved embryo diagnosis combined with SET may have the potential to reduce the cost per live birth per couple treated in IVF treatment practices. The results of this study are likely more sensitive to changes in the ongoing pregnancy rate and consequently the live birth rate than the diagnosis costs. The introduction of a validated Embryo-Dx technology will further support a move towards increased eSET procedures in IVF clinical practice and vice versa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans-Joerg Fugel
- Department of Pharmaoepidemiology and pharmacoeconomics, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cumulative live birth rate after two single frozen embryo transfers (eSFET) versus a double frozen embryo transfer (DFET) with cleavage stage embryos: a retrospective cohort study. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014; 31:1621-7. [PMID: 25267163 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-014-0346-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2014] [Accepted: 09/09/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE According to the latest ART report for Europe, about 13% of pregnancies after frozen embryo transfer are multiple. Our objective was to analyse the impact on the multiple pregnancy rate of two eSFET (elective single frozen embryo transfers) versus a DFET (double frozen embryo transfer) in women aged under 38 years, who had not achieved pregnancy in their fresh transfer and who had at least two vitrified embryos of A/B quality. METHODS This study was conducted from January 2010 to June 2013 at a public hospital. The couples were divided into three groups. Group DFET: the first cryotransfer of two embryos (105 women); cSFET group: the only cryotransfer of a single vitrified embryo (60 women); eSFET group, individually vitrified embryos: 20 patients included in a clinical trial of single-embryo fresh and frozen transfer and 21 patients who chose to receive eSFET. RESULTS The clinical pregnancy rate was 38.1% in the DET group and the cumulative clinical pregnancy rate was 43.3% in the eSFET group. There were no significant differences between the DFET and eSFET groups (30.0 vs 34.1%) in cumulative live birth delivery rate. The rate of multiple pregnancies varied significantly between the DFET and eSFET groups (32.5 vs 0%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS For good-prognosis women aged under 38 years, taking embryo quality as a criterion for inclusion, an eSFET policy can be applied, achieving acceptable cumulative clinical pregnancy and live birth rates and reducing multiple pregnancy rates.
Collapse
|
19
|
van Heesch MM, Evers JL, Dumoulin JC, van der Hoeven MA, van Beijsterveldt CE, Bonsel GJ, Dykgraaf RH, van Goudoever JB, Koopman-Esseboom C, Nelen WL, Steiner K, Tamminga P, Tonch N, van Zonneveld P, Dirksen CD. A comparison of perinatal outcomes in singletons and multiples born after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection stratified for neonatal risk criteria. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93:277-86. [DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2013] [Accepted: 12/28/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam M.J. van Heesch
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment; Maastricht University Medical Center; Maastricht the Netherlands
| | - Johannes L.H. Evers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; GROW; School for Oncology and Developmental Biology and Maastricht University Medical Center; Maastricht the Netherlands
| | - John C.M. Dumoulin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; GROW; School for Oncology and Developmental Biology and Maastricht University Medical Center; Maastricht the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Gouke J. Bonsel
- Department of Obstetrics & Prenatal Medicine; Erasmus Medical Center; Rotterdam the Netherlands
- Midwifery Academy Rotterdam; Rotterdam the Netherlands
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center; Rotterdam the Netherlands
| | - Ramon H.M. Dykgraaf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Division of Reproductive Medicine; Erasmus Medical Center; Rotterdam the Netherlands
| | - Johannes B. van Goudoever
- Department of Pediatrics; Emma Children's Hospital; Academic Medical Center; Amsterdam the Netherlands
- Department of Pediatrics; VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Corine Koopman-Esseboom
- Department of Neonatology; Wilhelmina Children's Hospital; University Medical Center Utrecht; Utrecht the Netherlands
| | - Willianne L.D.M. Nelen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center; Nijmegen the Netherlands
| | - Katerina Steiner
- Department of Neonatology; Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center; Nijmegen the Netherlands
| | - Pieter Tamminga
- Department of Neonatology; Academic Medical Center; Emma Children's Hospital; Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Nino Tonch
- Center for Reproductive Medicine; Academic Medical Center; Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Piet van Zonneveld
- Department of Reproductive Medicine; Division of Obstetrics, Neonatology and Gynecology; University Medical Center Utrecht; Utrecht the Netherlands
| | - Carmen D. Dirksen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment; Maastricht University Medical Center; Maastricht the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bhattacharya S, Kamath MS. Reducing multiple births in assisted reproduction technology. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 28:191-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2013] [Accepted: 11/26/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
21
|
Pandian Z, Marjoribanks J, Ozturk O, Serour G, Bhattacharya S. Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013:CD003416. [PMID: 23897513 PMCID: PMC6991461 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003416.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple embryo transfer during in vitro fertilisation (IVF) increases multiple pregnancy rates causing maternal and perinatal morbidity. Single embryo transfer is now being seriously considered as a means of minimising the risk of multiple pregnancy. However, this needs to be balanced against the risk of jeopardising the overall live birth rate. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different policies for the number of embryos transferred in couples who undergo assisted reproductive technology (ART). SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE, from inception to July 2013. We handsearched reference lists of articles, trial registers and relevant conference proceedings and contacted researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different policies for the number of embryos transferred following IVF or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in subfertile women. Studies of fresh or frozen and thawed transfer of one, two, three or four embryos at cleavage or blastocyst stage were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias and extracted the data. The overall quality of the evidence was graded in a summary of findings table. MAIN RESULTS Fourteen RCTs were included in the review (2165 women). Thirteen compared cleavage-stage transfers (2017 women) and two compared blastocyst transfers (148 women): one study compared both. No studies compared repeated multiple versus repeated single embryo transfer (SET). DET versus repeated SETDET was compared with repeated SET in three studies of cleavage-stage transfer. In these studies the SET group received either two cycles of fresh SET (one study) or one cycle of fresh SET followed by one frozen SET in a natural or hormone-stimulated cycle (two studies). When these three studies were pooled, the cumulative live birth rate after one cycle of DET was not significantly different from the rate after repeated SET (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.62, three studies, n=811, I(2)=0%, low quality evidence). This suggests that for a woman with a 40% chance of live birth following a single cycle of DET, the chance following repeated SET would be between 30% and 42%. The multiple pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the DET group (OR 30.54, 95% CI 7.46 to 124.95, three RCTs, n = 811, I(2) = 23%, low quality evidence), suggesting that for a woman with a 15% risk of multiple pregnancy following a single cycle of DET, the risk following repeated SET would be between 0% and 2%. Single-cycle DET versus single-cycle SETA single cycle of DET was compared with a single cycle of SET in 10 studies, nine comparing cleavage-stage transfers and two comparing blastocyst-stage transfers. When all studies were pooled the live birth rate was significantly higher in the DET group (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.68 to 2.57, nine studies, n = 1564, I(2) = 0%, high quality evidence). This suggests that for a woman with a 40% chance of live birth following a single cycle of DET, the chance following a single cycle of SET would be between 22% and 30%. The multiple pregnancy rate was also significantly higher in the DET group (OR 8.47, 95% CI 4.97 to 14.43, 10 studies, n = 1612, I(2) = 45%, high quality evidence), suggesting that for a woman with a 15% risk of multiple pregnancy following a single cycle of DET, the risk following a single cycle of SET would be between 1% and 4%. The heterogeneity for this analysis was attributable to a study with a high rate of cross-over between treatment arms. Other comparisons Other fresh cycle comparisons were evaluated in three studies which compared DET versus transfer of three or four embryos. Live birth rates did not differ significantly between the groups for any comparison, but there was a significantly lower multiple pregnancy rate in the DET group than in the three embryo transfer (TET) group (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.99, two studies, n = 343, I(2) = 0%). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In a single fresh IVF cycle, single embryo transfer is associated with a lower live birth rate than double embryo transfer. However, there is no evidence of a significant difference in the cumulative live birth rate when a single cycle of double embryo transfer is compared with repeated SET (either two cycles of fresh SET or one cycle of fresh SET followed by one frozen SET in a natural or hormone-stimulated cycle). Single embryo transfer is associated with much lower rates of multiple pregnancy than other embryo transfer policies. A policy of repeated SET may minimise the risk of multiple pregnancy in couples undergoing ART without substantially reducing the likelihood of achieving a live birth. Most of the evidence currently available concerns younger women with a good prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zabeena Pandian
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Aberdeen, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yilmaz N, Engin-Üstün Y, Inal H, Gorkem U, Bardakci Y, Gulerman C. The impact of single embryo transfer policy on pregnancy outcomes after legislative change. Gynecol Endocrinol 2013; 29:600-2. [PMID: 23656390 DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2013.788629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
We evaluated the effect of mandatory single embryo transfer (SET) on live birth rates and pregnancy outcomes in Turkey. A retrospective study was conducted in Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Education and Research Hospital. Four hundred and four patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles were included in the study. In Turkey, the number of embryos to be transferred in an assisted cycle was limited to three under normal circumstances until 6 March 2010. After that, new legislation was introduced to promote the application of SET. Outcomes were compared in periods of 1 year before and after the new law. We compared pregnancy outcomes of all assisted reproductive cycles in SET cycles (group 1: n = 281) with double embryo transfer (DET) cycles (group 2: n = 123). There were significant differences in oocyte number, multiple pregnancy, gestational age, birth weight and perinatal fetal morbidity between the groups (p = 0.023, 0.001, 0.001, 0.001, 0.001, respectively). But there were no differences in age, baseline FSH, infertility period, stimulation protocol, stimulation day, gonadotrophin dose, clinical pregnancy rate, abortion rate, live birth rate and cesarean rate (p > 0.05). These results suggest that under the new legislation multiple pregnancy rates and perinatal complications are significantly reduced without causing a significant decline in the pregnancy rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nafiye Yilmaz
- Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Education and Research Hospital, Reproductive Endocrinology Department, Ankara, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bastu E, Celik C, Keskin G, Buyru F. Evaluation of embryo transfer time (day 2 vs day 3) after imposed single embryo transfer legislation: when to transfer? J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2013; 33:387-90. [PMID: 23654322 DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2012.761186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
To determine whether the timing of embryo transfer (day 2 or day 3) affects pregnancy outcome in IVF patients, receiving single or double embryo transfer, 380 patients were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent GnRH antagonist protocol. When stratified by number of transferred embryos, single embryo transfer (SET) patients undergoing a day 2 embryo transfer (ET) had similar biochemical pregnancy (25% vs 20.4%; p > 0.05) and clinical pregnancy (16.6% vs 14.6%; p > 0.05) rates to SET patients that were undergoing a day 3 ET. A similar observation was again noted in double embryo transfer (DET) patients undergoing a day 2 ET, with similar biochemical pregnancy (35% vs 29.8%; p > 0.05) and clinical pregnancy (25% vs 15.5%; p > 0.05) rates to DET patients undergoing a day 3 ET. Women, despite age, number of transferred embryos and ET timing, have similar reproductive outcomes. Shortening or lengthening the duration of in vitro culture provides no obvious benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Bastu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tiitinen A. Prevention of multiple pregnancies in infertility treatment. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 26:829-40. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2012] [Revised: 04/23/2012] [Accepted: 05/13/2012] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
25
|
Feng G, Zhang B, Zhou H, Shu J, Gan X, Wu F, Deng X. Comparable clinical outcomes and live births after single vitrified-warmed and fresh blastocyst transfer. Reprod Biomed Online 2012; 25:466-73. [PMID: 22995746 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2012] [Revised: 06/30/2012] [Accepted: 07/11/2012] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Selective single-blastocyst transfer (SBT) in fresh cycles has been effective in reducing multiple pregnancies. However, we do not know whether this successful strategy of fresh transfer cycles is suitable for cryopreserved cycles. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the feasibility and value of SBT in vitrified-warmed cycles. Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) was similar with vitrified and fresh SBT (46.61% versus 52.15% respectively). Of the pregnant patients, monozygotic twin, miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy rates were similar with vitrified and fresh SBT. For the newborns, no significant difference was observed in live birth, low birthweight, premature delivery and birth defects rates between vitrified and fresh SBT. With respect to the quality of transferred blastocysts (from BB to AA), a similar CPR and miscarriage rate was obtained for both vitrified and fresh SBT when a similar blastocyst cohort graded ≥ 3BB was transferred. The data show that vitrified SBT is an effective means of reducing multiple pregnancy and that comparable clinical outcomes and live births are achieved if single blastocysts graded ≥ 3BB are transferred for both vitrified and fresh SBT. These data should encourage clinics to evaluate their embryo transfer policy and adopt vitrified SBT as everyday practice. Selective single-blastocyst transfer in fresh cycles has been an effective method to reduce the multiple pregnancies. However, due to a lack of adequate studies, we do not know whether this successful strategy in fresh transfer cycles is suitable in cryopreserved cycles. The present study was undertaken to explore the feasibility and value of single-blastocyst transfer in vitrified-warmed cycles. We found that single-blastocyst transfer in vitrified-warmed cycles is an effective means of reducing multiple pregnancy, and comparable clinical outcomes and live births were achieved if single blastocysts graded ≥ 3BB were transferred for both vitrified-warmed and fresh blastocyst transfer. These data should encourage clinics to evaluate their embryo transfer policy and adopt single-blastocyst transfer in cryopreserved cycles as their everyday practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guixue Feng
- Reproductive Medicine center, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530003, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Roca-de Bes M, Gutierrez-Maldonado J, Gris-Martínez JM. Comparative study of the psychosocial risks associated with families with multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology (ART) and without ART. Fertil Steril 2011; 96:170-4. [PMID: 21723442 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2011] [Revised: 05/01/2011] [Accepted: 05/03/2011] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether the psychosocial risks associated with multiple births are increased as a consequence of the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in comparison with those not resulting from ART. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING Fertility units of a university hospital and a private hospital. PATIENT(S) Parents of single children and multiples (twins and triplets) between 6 months and 4 years of age (n = 636) were divided into two groups: those who conceived through ART (n = 265) and those who conceived through non-ART (n = 371). INTERVENTION(S) Administration of six scales, in office or by mail. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Measurement scales of material necessities, social stigma, marital satisfaction, perceived stress, depression, quality of life, and their subscales. RESULT(S) The analysis of variance, Student's t-test, and χ(2)-test were applied. No effect was observed based on the use of ART in the psychosocial variables studied. Significant differences were obtained between the groups of single (SB) and multiple births (MB) with respect to material necessities, social stigma, marital satisfaction, depression, and quality of life. CONCLUSION(S) Having more than one child per birth, whether resulting from the use of ART or not, increases psychosocial risks for the parents. Assisted reproduction centers should include this information with the obstetric and neonatal risks, stressing the advantages of having one child per birth. Psychosocial risks are not increased as a result of having used ART, but the goal of avoiding the repeated use of ART does influence the desire to transfer the maximum number of embryos possible. Psychological counseling should be included before initiating ART, as well as when a multiple pregnancy is confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Montserrat Roca-de Bes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Division, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Passeig Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Fiddelers AAA, Nieman FHM, Dumoulin JCM, van Montfoort APA, Land JA, Evers JLH, Severens JL, Dirksen CD. During IVF treatment patient preference shifts from singletons towards twins but only a few patients show an actual reversal of preference. Hum Reprod 2011; 26:2092-100. [PMID: 21546387 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowledge of patients' preferences for elective single embryo transfer (eSET) or double embryo transfer (DET) and for singletons or twins is of great importance in counselling for embryo transfer (ET) strategies. In this study, the stability of IVF patients' preferences over time for either a healthy single child or healthy twins was measured and we investigated which factors could explain preference shifts. METHODS Infertile women (n = 177) who participated in an RCT comparing one cycle eSET with one cycle DET were included. A satisfaction questionnaire was developed to measure patient preferences and attitudes at two moments in time, i.e. at 2 weeks before ET and at 2 weeks following ET, after the results of the pregnancy test. Regression analysis examined the effect of several variables on preference shifts. RESULTS Before ET, most patients expressed a preference for a singleton, whereas most patients were indifferent 2 weeks after ET, resulting in an overall preference shift towards twins (P = 0.002; n = 145). Overall, 62% of patients showed a preference shift. Preference shifts were explained by patients' global satisfaction of the information given by the fertility clinic staff received by the fertility clinic staff, and an interaction between the occurrence of pregnancy and transfer policy (eSET or DET). CONCLUSIONS In general, patients' preferences for a singleton or twins are not stable during IVF treatment. Possible explanations of a shift in preference are that pregnant patients attuned their preferences to what they expect their pregnancy to result in, whereas non-pregnant patients shifted towards a preference for twins in order to be able to fulfil their ultimate child wish.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey A A Fiddelers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Research Institute Grow and Development, and Care and Public Health Research Institute, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mark Hirst W, Vail A, Brison DR, Roberts SA. Prognostic factors influencing fresh and frozen IVF outcomes: an analysis of the UK national database. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 22:437-48. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2010] [Revised: 12/09/2010] [Accepted: 12/15/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
29
|
Scotland GS, McLernon D, Kurinczuk JJ, McNamee P, Harrild K, Lyall H, Rajkhowa M, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. Minimising twins in in vitro fertilisation: a modelling study assessing the costs, consequences and cost-utility of elective single versus double embryo transfer over a 20-year time horizon. BJOG 2011; 118:1073-83. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02966.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
30
|
Hatzistilianou M, Antoniades D, Zournatzi V, Pappa S, Antoniades M, Koiou K, Frydas I, Tzafetas J. Isoenzymes of Adenosine Deaminase and Metalloproteinases as Biomarkers in in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2011; 24:25-31. [DOI: 10.1177/039463201102400104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
It is estimated that approximately 1% of babies born per year result from in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer, and other assisted reproductive technologies. In humans, the exact mechanisms that lead to embryonic attachment to the endometrial epithelium and invasion into the endometrial stroma have not been fully characterized. The aim of the study is to estimate serum total adenosine deaminase and isoenzymes ADA1, ADA2, as well as MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-13 and MIP-1a as parameters for pregnancy following IVF-ET. The study group comprised seventeen women who conceived (Group A) and nineteen women aged 21–42 years who did not conceive (Group B) after IVF-ET. Blood samples were collected between 09.00 and 10.00 a.m. during IVF-ET treatment at two different periods. The first blood sample was collected before ET and the second sample 14 days after ET. All serum samples were assayed for the MMP-2, MMP-3 MMP-13 and MIP-1a concentrations with ELISA assay. Serum tADA activity was measured by a spectrophotometer using adenosine as the substrate (Method by Giusti). According to our results it was demonstrated that women who successfully conceived after IVF-ET showed significantly lower serum concentrations of ADA1, MMP-2, MMP-3 and higher serum concentration of MMP-13 at 14 days following ET. In conclusion, ADA1 may play a protective role at the hemochorial interface. Thus, our results suggest that ADA1 may have a modulatory role in the implantation and duration of the pregnancy. In women with successful or unsuccessful pregnancy compared with normal women the levels of ADA and MMPs may be affected by the exogenous hormone therapy according to the protocol of ovarian stimulation during IVF-ET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Hatzistilianou
- 2nd Department of Paediatrics, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
| | - D. Antoniades
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - V. Zournatzi
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - S. Pappa
- 2nd Department of Paediatrics, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
| | - M. Antoniades
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - K. Koiou
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - I. Frydas
- 2nd Department of Paediatrics, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
| | - J. Tzafetas
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
van Heesch MMJ, Bonsel GJ, Dumoulin JCM, Evers JLH, van der Hoeven MA, Severens JL, Dykgraaf RHM, van der Veen F, Tonch N, Nelen WLDM, van Zonneveld P, van Goudoever JB, Tamminga P, Steiner K, Koopman-Esseboom C, van Beijsterveldt CEM, Boomsma DI, Snellen D, Dirksen CD. Long term costs and effects of reducing the number of twin pregnancies in IVF by single embryo transfer: the TwinSing study. BMC Pediatr 2010; 10:75. [PMID: 20961411 PMCID: PMC2978208 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-10-75] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2010] [Accepted: 10/20/2010] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pregnancies induced by in vitro fertilisation (IVF) often result in twin gestations, which are associated with both maternal and perinatal complications. An effective way to reduce the number of IVF twin pregnancies is to decrease the number of embryos transferred from two to one. The interpretation of current studies is limited because they used live birth as outcome measure and because they applied limited time horizons. So far, research on long-term outcomes of IVF twins and singletons is scarce and inconclusive. The objective of this study is to investigate the short (1-year) and long-term (5 and 18-year) costs and health outcomes of IVF singleton and twin children and to consider these in estimating the cost-effectiveness of single embryo transfer compared with double embryo transfer, from a societal and a healthcare perspective. Methods/Design A multi-centre cohort study will be performed, in which IVF singletons and IVF twin children born between 2003 and 2005 of whom parents received IVF treatment in one of the five participating Dutch IVF centres, will be compared. Data collection will focus on children at risk of health problems and children in whom health problems actually occurred. First year of life data will be collected in approximately 1,278 children (619 singletons and 659 twin children). Data up to the fifth year of life will be collected in approximately 488 children (200 singletons and 288 twin children). Outcome measures are health status, health-related quality of life and costs. Data will be obtained from hospital information systems, a parent questionnaire and existing registries. Furthermore, a prognostic model will be developed that reflects the short and long-term costs and health outcomes of IVF singleton and twin children. This model will be linked to a Markov model of the short-term cost-effectiveness of single embryo transfer strategies versus double embryo transfer strategies to enable the calculation of the long-term cost-effectiveness. Discussion This is, to our knowledge, the first study that investigates the long-term costs and health outcomes of IVF singleton and twin children and the long-term cost-effectiveness of single embryo transfer strategies versus double embryo transfer strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam M J van Heesch
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Min JK, Hughes E, Young D. [Single embryo transfer for in vitro fertilization]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2010; 32:477-494. [PMID: 20500958 DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34503-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
33
|
Elective Single Embryo Transfer Following In Vitro Fertilization. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2010; 32:363-377. [DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34482-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
34
|
|
35
|
Bouzayen R, Eggertson L. [In vitro fertilization: a private matter becomes public]. CMAJ 2009; 181:E71-2. [PMID: 19720691 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.091408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
36
|
Teranishi A, Kuwata A, Fumino T, Hamai H, Shigeta M. A theoretical model for single blastocyst transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 2009; 26:327-34. [PMID: 19597982 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-009-9321-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2008] [Accepted: 05/18/2009] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To elucidate the relationship between embryo grade and ART outcomes and determine how to decrease multiple pregnancy rates by assigning patients to single embryo transfer (SET) instead of dual embryo transfer (DET) according to embryo grade and/or availability. DESIGN Retrospective medical record review. SETTING IVF fertility center. PATIENTS 247 women undergoing day 5 DET after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment. METHODS We retrospectively investigated embryo grade and outcomes on day 5 DET and calculated theoretical multiple pregnancy rates by assigning patients to SET instead of DET according to a combination of embryo grades and availability. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES Implantation, pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, expected pregnancy and expected multiple pregnancy rates. RESULTS Embryo grade affects implantation rates so that embryo transfer of at least one embryo with grade > or = 3BB resulted in high multiple pregnancy rates as well as high pregnancy rates. By performing DET, the clinical pregnancy rate was 39.9% with a multiple pregnancy rate of 33.3%; however, had SET been performed with an embryo graded 3BB or better, theoretical calculated pregnancy rates would have dropped to 35.8% but with a multiple pregnancy rate of 7.2%. CONCLUSIONS Our model showed that cases having at least one embryo with grade > or = 3BB might serve as suitable candidates for SET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Teranishi
- Advanced Fertility Center of Fuchu Nozomi, Fuchu-cho 2-1-3, Izumi, Osaka 594-0071, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Pandian Z, Bhattacharya S, Ozturk O, Serour G, Templeton A. Number of embryos for transfer following in-vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009:CD003416. [PMID: 19370588 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003416.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple embryo transfer during IVF has increased multiple pregnancy rates (MPR) causing maternal and perinatal morbidity. Elective single embryo transfer (SET) is now being considered as an effective means of reducing this iatrogenic complication. OBJECTIVES To determine in couples undergoing IVF/ICSI (intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection) whether:(1) elective transfer of two embryos improves the probability of livebirth compared with:(a) elective single embryo transfer,(b) three embryo transfer (TET) or(c) four embryo transfer (FET).(2) elective transfer of three embryos improves the probability of livebirth compared with:(a) elective single embryo transfer, or(b) elective four embryo transfer. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's trials register (searched March 2008), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2008), MEDLINE (1970 to 2008), EMBASE (1985 to 2008) and reference lists of articles. Relevant conference proceedings were hand-searched and researchers in the field contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and quality of trials. MAIN RESULTS For the update in 2008 five trials compared DET with SET. DET versus TET and DET versus FET were evaluated in a single small trial each. The difference in cumulative livebirth rates (CLBR) after DET and those after SET followed by transfer of a single frozen thawed embryo (1FZET) was not statistically significant (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.11; p=0.18). There was no statistically significant difference in CLBR after a single fresh cycle of DET versus two fresh cycles of SET (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.56 to 2.69, p= 0.60 ). The live birth rate (LBR) per woman in a single fresh treatment was higher following DET than SET (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.65 to 2.66, p<0.00001). The MPR was lower following SET (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.11; p< 0.00001). The CLBR following two fresh cycles of DET versus two fresh cycles of TET (OR 0.77, 95%CI 0.22 to 2.65, p=0.67) and CLBR after three fresh cycles of DET versus three fresh cycles of TET showed no statistically significant differences (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.52; p=0.67). There were no statistically significant differences between DET and TET in terms of LBR (OR 0.40, 95%CI 0.09 to 1.85; p=0.24) and MPR (OR 0.17, 95%CI 0.01 to 3.85; p= 0.27). DET led to lower LBR than FET but the difference was not statistically significant (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.05; p = 0.06). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In a single fresh IVF cycle, SET is associated with a lower LBR than DET. However there is no significant difference in CLBR following SET+ 1FZET and the LBR following a single cycle of DET. MPR are lowered following SET compared with other transfer policies. There are insufficient data on the outcome of two versus three and four embryo transfer policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zabeena Pandian
- Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Foresterhill, Aberdeen , UK, AB25 2ZD.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Simon J, Petrou S, Gray A. The valuation of prenatal life in economic evaluations of perinatal interventions. HEALTH ECONOMICS 2009; 18:487-494. [PMID: 18615854 DOI: 10.1002/hec.1375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Perinatal interventions delivered during the prenatal period have the potential to directly impact prenatal life. The decision on when to begin 'counting' the life of an infant in the calculus has received little attention in previous economic evaluations of perinatal interventions. We illustrate, using data from a recent trial-based economic evaluation of magnesium sulphate given to women with pre-eclampsia to prevent eclampsia, how different definitions of when human life commences can have a significant impact upon cost-effectiveness estimates based on composite outcome measures such as life years or quality-adjusted life years gained or disability-adjusted life years averted. Further, we suggest ways in which methods in this area can be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judit Simon
- Health Economics Research Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Veleva Z, Karinen P, Tomás C, Tapanainen JS, Martikainen H. Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod 2009; 24:1632-9. [PMID: 19318704 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Zdravka Veleva
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oulu, PO Box 5000, Oulu FIN-90014, Finland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Fiddelers AA, Dirksen CD, Dumoulin JC, van Montfoort AP, Land JA, Janssen JM, Evers JL, Severens JL. Cost-effectiveness of seven IVF strategies: results of a Markov decision-analytic model. Hum Reprod 2009; 24:1648-55. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
|
41
|
Nelson SM, Yates RW, Lyall H, Jamieson M, Traynor I, Gaudoin M, Mitchell P, Ambrose P, Fleming R. Anti-Mullerian hormone-based approach to controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted conception. Hum Reprod 2008; 24:867-75. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 259] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
42
|
Kartberg AJ, Hambiliki F, Arvidsson T, Stavreus-Evers A, Svalander P. Vitrification with DMSO protects embryo membrane integrity better than solutions without DMSO. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 17:378-84. [PMID: 18765008 DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60221-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Vitrification has become common for cryopreservation of embryos. However, the most optimal protocol for vitrification is still to be found. Two vitrification protocols with similar osmolarities were compared: Protocol A, containing dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), propane-2-diol, and ethylene glycol, and Protocol B, containing propane-2-diol and ethylene glycol. Viability and the importance of specific incubation times for early embryo recovery, survival, and cleavage were studied. For assessment of cryodamage, embryos were labelled with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated annexin V and propidium iodide. Vitrification studies on early mouse embryos were followed up with studies on human embryos. The two vitrification protocols did not differ in embryo survival rates and were equally efficient in both mouse and human embryo models. Morphological assessment of embryos directly after vitrification was not a useful tool for assessing survival in this study. Extended exposure of embryos with both vitrification protocols showed that the DMSO-containing vitrification solutions did not lead to cell membrane damage and death as quickly as the DMSO-free vitrification solutions. To assess embryo viability, the authors recommend that vitrification of early embryos should be combined with extended culture and assessment of normal blastocyst development before transferring to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A-J Kartberg
- Gothenburg IVF Research, Carlanders Hospital, 412 55, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Dixon S, Faghih Nasiri F, Ledger WL, Lenton EA, Duenas A, Sutcliffe P, Chilcott JB. Cost-effectiveness analysis of different embryo transfer strategies in England. BJOG 2008; 115:758-66. [PMID: 18355368 DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01667.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of different embryo transfer strategies for a single cycle when two embryos are available, and taking the NHS cost perspective. DESIGN Cost-effectiveness model. SETTING Five in vitro fertilisation (IVF) centres in England between 2003/04 and 2004/05. POPULATION Women with two embryos available for transfer in three age groups (<30, 30-35 and 36-39 years). METHODS A decision analytic model was constructed using observational data collected from a sample of fertility centres in England. Costs and adverse outcomes are estimated up to 5 years after the birth. Incremental cost per live birth was calculated for different embryo transfer strategies and for three separate age groups: less than 30, 30-35 and 36-39 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Premature birth, neonatal intensive care unit admissions and days, cerebral palsy and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS Single fresh embryo transfer (SET) plus frozen single embryo transfer (fzSET) is the more costly in terms of IVF costs, but the lower rates of multiple births mean that in terms of total costs, it is less costly than double embryo transfer (DET). Adverse events increase when moving from SET to SET+fzSET to DET. The probability of SET+fzSET being cost-effective decreases with age. When SET is included in the analysis, SET+fzSET no longer becomes a cost-effective option at any threshold value for all age groups studied. CONCLUSIONS The analyses show that the choice of embryo transfer strategy is a function of four factors: the age of the mother, the relevance of the SET option, the value placed on a live birth and the relative importance placed on adverse outcomes. For each patient group, the choice of strategy is a trade-off between the value placed on a live birth and cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Dixon
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
|
45
|
Pandian Z, Bhattacharya S, Ozturk O, Serour GI, Templeton A. Number of embryos for transfer following in-vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004:CD003416. [PMID: 15495053 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003416.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The traditional reliance on the transfer of multiple embryos during in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in order to maximise the chance of pregnancy, has resulted in increasing rates of multiple pregnancies. Women undergoing IVF had a 20 - fold increased risk of twins and 400 - fold increased risk of higher order pregnancies (Martin 1998). The maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality as well as national health service costs associated with multiple pregnancies is significantly high in comparison with singleton births (Luke 1992; Callahan 1994; Goldfarb 1996). Single embryo transfer is now being considered as an effective means of reducing this iatrogenic complication. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of elective two embryo transfer in comparison with single and more than two embryo transfer following IVF and ICSI (intra cytoplasmic sperm injection) treatment. OBJECTIVES The aim of this review is to determine, whether in couples who undergo IVF/ICSI: (1) the elective transfer of two embryos improves the probability of livebirth compared with: (a) Single embryo transfer, (b) Three embryo transfer or (c) Four embryo transfer.(2) the elective transfer of three embryos improves the probability of livebirth compared with: (a) Single embryo transfer, or (b) Four embryo transfer, SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's trials register (searched June 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2003), MEDLINE (1970 to 2003), EMBASE (1985 to 2003) and reference lists of articles. We also handsearched relevant conference proceedings and contacted researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA Only randomised controlled trials were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and quality of trials. MAIN RESULTS We found no studies that compared a policy of transferring multiple embryos on one cycle versus a policy of cryo- preservation and transfer of a single embryo over multiple cycles. We also found no trials comparing transfer of two versus three embryos. Three small, poorly reported trials compared transfer of two versus one embryo in a single cycle, and one small, poorly reported trial compared transfer of two versus four embryos in a single cycle. The clinical pregnancy rate per woman/couple associated with two embryo transfer was significantly higher compared to single embryo transfer (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.24 to 3.50; test for overall effect p = 0.006). The live birth rate per woman/couple associated with two embryo transfer was also significantly higher than that associated with single embryo transfer (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.22, test for overall effect p=0.02). The multiple pregnancy rate was significantly lower in women who had single embryo transfer (OR 9.97, 95% CI 2.61 to 38.19; p = 0.0008). The effectiveness of double embryo transfer versus four embryo transfer was tested in a single trial. There was no statistically significant differences in the clinical pregnancy rate (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.26 to 2.16; p=0.6), and multiple pregnancy rates (OR 0.44. 95% CI 0.10 to 1.97; p = 0.28) between the two groups. The livebirth rate in the four embryo transfer group was higher compared to the two embryo transfer group, but the results were not statistically significant (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.05; p = 0.06). REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS The results of this systematic review suggest that live birth and pregnancy rates following single embryo transfer are lower than those following double embryo transfer as are the chances of multiple pregnancy including twins. As such, it is unlikely that the conclusions are robust enough to catalyse a change in clinical practice. The studies included are limited by their small sample size, so that even large differences might be hidden. Cumulative livebirth rates are seldom reported. The data were inadequate to draw conclusions about single embryo transfer and first frozen single embryo transfer (1FZET) or subsequent single frozen embryo transfers. Until more evidence is available single embryo transfer may not be the preferred choice for all patients undergoing IVF/ICSI. Clinicians may need to individualise protocols for couples based on their risks of multiple pregnancy. A definitive pragmatic, large multi centre randomised controlled trial comparing single embryo versus double embryo transfer in terms of clinical and cost effectiveness as well as acceptability is required. The primary outcome measured should be cumulative livebirth per woman/couple.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Pandian
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Cornhill Road, Aberdeen, UK, AB15 2ZD.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|