1
|
Mandrik O, Tolma E, Zielonke N, Meheus F, Ordóñez-Reyes C, Severens JL, Murillo R. Systematic reviews as a "lens of evidence": Determinants of participation in breast cancer screening. J Med Screen 2021; 28:70-79. [PMID: 32517538 PMCID: PMC8167916 DOI: 10.1177/0969141320930743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the determinants of the participation rate in breast cancer screening programs by conducting a systematic review of reviews. METHODS We conducted a systematic search in PubMed via Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane identifying the literature up to April 2019. Out of 2258 revealed unique abstracts, we included 31 reviews, from which 25 were considered as systematic. We applied the Walsh & McPhee Systems Model of Clinical Preventive Care to systematize the determinants of screening participation. RESULTS The reviews, mainly in high-income settings, reported a wide range for breast cancer screening participation rate: 16-90%. The determinants of breast cancer screening participation were simple low-cost interventions such as invitation letters, basic information on screening, multiple reminders, fixed appointments, prompts from healthcare professionals, and healthcare organizational factors (e.g. close proximity to screening facility). More complex interventions (such as face-to-face counselling or home visits), mass media or improved access to transport should not be encouraged by policy makers unless other information appears. The repeated participation in mammography screening was consistently high, above 62%. Previous positive experience with screening influenced the repeated participation in screening programs. The reviews were inconsistent in the use of terminology related to breast cancer screening participation, which may have contributed to the heterogeneity in the reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that consistent findings of systematic reviews bring more certainty into the conclusions on the effects of simple invitation techniques, fixed appointments and prompts, as well as healthcare organizational factors on promoting participation rate in screening mammography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Mandrik
- School of Health and Related Research, Health Economic and Decision Science (HEDS), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Section of Early Detection and Prevention, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - E Tolma
- Faculty of Public Health, Kuwait University, Jabriya, Kuwait
| | - N Zielonke
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F Meheus
- Section of Early Detection and Prevention, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - C Ordóñez-Reyes
- Centro Javeriano de Oncología, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - JL Severens
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Murillo
- Section of Early Detection and Prevention, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
- Centro Javeriano de Oncología, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
- Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peultier A, Redekop WK, Boccalini S, Clayton B, Severens JL. Cost-effectiveness of imaging strategies to diagnose and select patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease for statin treatment in the United Kingdom. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa356.428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): The project leading to this publication has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 668142.
Background
Patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) are at a higher risk of cardiovascular events compared to those with normal arteries. Plaque rupture is associated with increased adverse events and statin therapy seems to be beneficial for plaque stabilisation. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) is currently the non-invasive imaging modality of choice for the morphological evaluation of NOCAD in the United Kingdom (UK). However, CCTA provides limited information regarding the vulnerability of plaques to rupture and the selection of patients for preventive statin treatment. Currently being tested on patients, Spectral Photon-Counting CT (SPCCT) may provide increased accuracy for vulnerable plaque detection and, in turn, improved selection of patients for statin treatment.
Purpose
We investigated the potential cost-effectiveness of SPCCT (compared to a set of CCTA-based strategies) in identifying NOCAD patients with rupture-prone plaques for preventive statin treatment.
Methods
A decision tree and a Markov trace were developed to model the expected outcomes (costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)) for a hypothetical UK cohort of 50-year-old male patients with stable chest pain and no history of CAD. Input data were obtained from the literature. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. The impact of a pairwise variation of SPCCT sensitivity and specificity was analysed. Furthermore, five competing imaging strategies were compared in terms of their lifetime costs and effects: 1) CCTA and treat NOCAD based on imaging results, 2) CCTA and treat all NOCAD, 3) CCTA and do not treat NOCAD, 4) SPCCT with high specificity and treat NOCAD based on imaging results, and 5) SPCCT with high sensitivity and treat NOCAD based on imaging results.
Results
Our deterministic and probabilistic results showed that an improved imaging test would add value compared to CCTA. While increased specificity (to 95%) is favorable at a lower willingness to pay (WTP) (up to ∼£9,000 per QALY), increased sensitivity (to 95%) is more likely to be favorable at a higher WTP (∼£9,000 to £120,000 per QALY). The role of a CCTA-treat-none strategy and a CCTA-treat-all strategy is minimal and potential only at really low (<£2,000 per QALY) and high (>£120,000 per QALY) WTP, respectively. The uncertainty around these results is highly correlated to the uncertainty around the long-term risk for NOCAD patients to experience myocardial infarction or stroke.
Conclusion
An improved imaging test based on higher sensitivity in identifying rupture-prone coronary plaques in NOCAD patients seems to have value in guiding the decision of preventive statin treatment in the UK. However, additional data regarding the efficacy of statins and of combined treatments for NOCAD patients are needed before the cost-effectiveness of SPCCT can be precisely estimated in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Peultier
- Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands (The)
| | - WK Redekop
- Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands (The)
| | - S Boccalini
- Hospital Louis Pradel of Bron, Radiology, Lyon, France
| | - B Clayton
- Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - JL Severens
- Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands (The)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lenk EJ, Moungui HC, Boussinesq M, Kamgno J, Nana-Djeunga HC, Fitzpatrick C, Peultier ACMM, Klion AD, Fletcher DA, Nutman TB, Pion SD, Niamsi-Emalio Y, Redekop WK, Severens JL, Stolk WA. A Test-and-Not-Treat Strategy for Onchocerciasis Elimination in Loa loa-coendemic Areas: Cost Analysis of a Pilot in the Soa Health District, Cameroon. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 70:1628-1635. [PMID: 31165855 PMCID: PMC7146010 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Severe adverse events after treatment with ivermectin in individuals with high levels of Loa loa microfilariae in the blood preclude onchocerciasis elimination through community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI) in Central Africa. We measured the cost of a community-based pilot using a test-and-not-treat (TaNT) strategy in the Soa health district in Cameroon. Methods Based on actual expenditures, we empirically estimated the economic cost of the Soa TaNT campaign, including financial costs and opportunity costs that will likely be borne by control programs and stakeholders in the future. In addition to the empirical analyses, we estimated base-case, less intensive, and more intensive resource use scenarios to explore how costs might differ if TaNT were implemented programmatically. Results The total costs of US$283 938 divided by total population, people tested, and people treated with 42% coverage were US$4.0, US$9.2, and US$9.5, respectively. In programmatic implementation, these costs (base-case estimates with less and more intensive scenarios) could be US$2.2 ($1.9–$3.6), US$5.2 ($4.5–$8.3), and US$5.4 ($4.6–$8.6), respectively. Conclusions TaNT clearly provides a safe strategy for large-scale ivermectin treatment and overcomes a major obstacle to the elimination of onchocerciasis in areas coendemic for Loa loa. Although it is more expensive than standard CDTI, costs vary depending on the setting, the implementation choices made by the institutions involved, and the community participation rate. Research on the required duration of TaNT is needed to improve the affordability assessment, and more experience is needed to understand how to implement TaNT optimally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edeltraud J Lenk
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam.,Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henri C Moungui
- Centre for Research on Filariasis and Other Tropical Diseases, Yaounde, Cameroon
| | - Michel Boussinesq
- Unité Mixte Internationale, TransVIHMI, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, University of Montpellier, France
| | - Joseph Kamgno
- Centre for Research on Filariasis and Other Tropical Diseases, Yaounde, Cameroon
| | | | | | | | - Amy D Klion
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Thomas B Nutman
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Sébastien D Pion
- Unité Mixte Internationale, TransVIHMI, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, University of Montpellier, France
| | | | - William K Redekop
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam
| | - Johan L Severens
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam
| | - Wilma A Stolk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Peultier A, Venetsanos D, Rashid I, Severens JL, Redekop WK. European survey on acute coronary syndrome diagnosis and revascularisation treatment: Assessing differences in reported clinical practice with a focus on strategies for specific patient cases. J Eval Clin Pract 2020; 26:1457-1466. [PMID: 31994256 PMCID: PMC7587003 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Revised: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES While different imaging and treatment options are available in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) care, there is a lack of data regarding their use across Europe. We examined the diagnostic and treatment strategies in patients with known or suspected ACS as reported by physicians and identified variations in responses across European countries and geographical areas. METHOD A web-based clinician survey focusing on ACS imaging and revascularization treatments was circulated through email distribution lists and websites of European professional societies in the field of cardiology. We collected information on respondents' clinical setting and specialty. Reported percentages of patients receiving imaging or treatment modalities and percentages of clinicians reporting to use modalities in a range of clinical scenarios were analyzed. Statistical comparisons were performed. RESULTS In total, 69 responses were received (Sweden [n = 20], United Kingdom [n = 16], Northern/Western Europe [n = 17], Southern Europe [n = 9], and Central Europe [n = 7]). Considerable variations between geographical areas were seen in terms of reported diagnostic modalities and treatment strategies. For example, when presented with the scenario of a theoretical 45-year-old smoking female with a suspected ACS, 56% of UK clinicians reported to use coronary computed tomography angiography, compared to only 10% of Swedish clinicians (P = .002). Large variations were observed regarding the reported use of fractional flow reserve by physicians for non-culprit lesions during invasive management of myocardial infarction patients (44% in Sweden, 31% in the United Kingdom, and 30% in Northern/Western Europe vs non-use in Central and Southern Europe). CONCLUSIONS In this survey, respondents reported different diagnostic and treatment strategies in ACS care. These variations seem to have geographic components. Larger studies or real world data are needed to verify these observations and investigate their causes. More research is needed to compare the quality and efficiency of ACS care across countries and explore pathways for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne‐Claire Peultier
- Health Technology Assessment, Erasmus School of Health Policy and ManagementErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Dimitrios Venetsanos
- Coronary Artery and Vascular Disease, Heart and Vascular Theme, Department of MedicineKarolinska Institute and Karolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Imran Rashid
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Case Cardiovascular Research InstituteCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandOhio
| | - Johan L. Severens
- Health Technology Assessment, Erasmus School of Health Policy and ManagementErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Institute for Medical Technology AssessmentErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - William K. Redekop
- Health Technology Assessment, Erasmus School of Health Policy and ManagementErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Institute for Medical Technology AssessmentErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Albuquerque de Almeida F, Al MJ, Koymans R, Riistama J, Pauws S, Severens JL. Impact of hospitalisation on health-related quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020; 18:262. [PMID: 32746842 PMCID: PMC7397623 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-020-01508-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Empirical identification of the direct impact of hospitalisation in the change in utility could provide an interpretation for some of the unexplained variance in quality of life responses in clinical practice and clinical trials and provide assistance to researchers in assessing the impact of a hospitalisation in the context of economic evaluations. This study had the goal of determining the impact of nonfatal hospitalisations on the quality of life of a cohort of patients previously diagnosed with heart failure by using their quality of life measurements before and after hospitalisation. METHODS The impact of hospitalisation on health-related quality of life was estimated by calculating the difference in utility measured using the EQ-5D-3L in patients that were hospitalised and had records of utility before and after hospitalisation. The variation in differences between the utilities pre and post hospitalisation was explained through two multiple linear regression models using (1) the individual patient characteristics and (2) the hospitalisation characteristics as explanatory variables. RESULTS The mean difference between health-related quality of life measurement pre and post hospitalisation was found to be 0.020 [95% CI: - 0.020, 0.059] when measured with the EQ-5D index, while there was a mean decrease of - 0.012 [95% CI: - 0.043, 0.020] in the utility measured with the visual analogue scale. Differences in utility variation according to the primary cause for hospitalisation were found. Regression models showed a statistically significant impact of body mass index and serum creatinine in the index utility differences and of serum creatinine for utilities measured with the visual analogue scale. CONCLUSIONS Knowing the impact of hospitalisation on health-related quality of life is particularly relevant for informing cost-effectiveness studies designed to assess health technologies aimed at reducing hospital admissions. Through using patient-level data it was possible to estimate the variation in utilities before and after the average hospitalisation and for hospitalisations due to the most common causes for hospital admission. These estimates for (dis) utility could be used in the calculations of effectiveness on economic evaluations, especially when discrete event simulations are the employed modelling technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maiwenn J. Al
- ESHPM – Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- iMTA – Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ron Koymans
- Professional Health Services and Solutions, Philips Research Europe, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Jarno Riistama
- Chronic Disease Management, Philips Research Europe, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Steffen Pauws
- Chronic Disease Management, Philips Research Europe, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Johan L. Severens
- ESHPM – Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- iMTA – Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Peultier AC, Pandya A, Sharma R, Severens JL, Redekop WK. Cost-effectiveness of Mechanical Thrombectomy More Than 6 Hours After Symptom Onset Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2012476. [PMID: 32840620 PMCID: PMC7448828 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Two 2018 randomized controlled trials (DAWN and DEFUSE 3) demonstrated the clinical benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) more than 6 hours after onset in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Health-economic evidence is needed to determine whether the short-term health benefits of late MT translate to a cost-effective option during a lifetime in the United States. OBJECTIVE To compare the cost-effectiveness of 2 strategies (MT added to standard medical care [SMC] vs SMC alone) for various subgroups of patients with AIS receiving care more than 6 hours after symptom onset. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This economic evaluation study used the results of the DAWN and DEFUSE 3 trials to populate a cost-effectiveness model from a US health care perspective combining a decision tree and Markov trace. The DAWN and DEFUSE 3 trials enrolled 206 international patients from 2014 to 2017 and 182 US patients from 2016 to 2017, respectively. Patients were followed until 3 months after stroke. The clinical outcome at 3 months was available for 29 subgroups of patients with AIS and anterior circulation large vessel occlusions. Data analysis was conducted from July 2018 to October 2019. EXPOSURES MT with SMC in the extended treatment window vs SMC alone. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Expected costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) during lifetime were estimated. Deterministic results (incremental costs and effectiveness, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and net monetary benefit) were presented, and probabilistic analyses were performed for the total populations and 27 patient subgroups. RESULTS In the DAWN study, the MT group had a mean (SD) age of 69.4 (14.1) years and 42 of 107 (39.3%) were men, and the control group had a mean (SD) age of 70.7 (13.2) years and 51 of 99 (51.5%) were men. In the DEFUSE 3 study, the MT group had a median (interquartile range) age of 70 (59-79) years, and 46 of 92 (50.0%) were men, and the control group had a median (interquartile range) age of 71 (59-80) years, and 44 of 90 (48.9%) were men. For the total trial population, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were $662/QALY and $13 877/QALY based on the DAWN and DEFUSE 3 trials, respectively. MT with SMC beyond 6 hours had a probability greater than 99.9% of being cost-effective vs SMC alone at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY. Subgroup analyses showed a wide range of probabilities for MT with SMC to be cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000/QALY, with the greatest uncertainty observed for patients with a National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score of at least 16 and for those aged 80 years or older. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The results of this study suggest that late MT added to SMC is cost-effective in all subgroups evaluated in the DAWN and DEFUSE 3 trials, with most results being robust in probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Future MT evidence-gathering could focus on older patients and those with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores of 16 and greater.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Claire Peultier
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ankur Pandya
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Richa Sharma
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Johan L. Severens
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W. Ken Redekop
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schwab B, Wimmer W, Severens JL, Caversaccio MD. Adverse events associated with bone-conduction and middle-ear implants: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 277:423-438. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05727-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
8
|
Büyükkaramikli NC, Rutten-van Mölken MPMH, Severens JL, Al M. TECH-VER: A Verification Checklist to Reduce Errors in Models and Improve Their Credibility. Pharmacoeconomics 2019; 37:1391-1408. [PMID: 31705406 PMCID: PMC6860463 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00844-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In health economic literature, checklists or best practice recommendations on model validation/credibility always declare verification of the programmed model as a fundamental step, such as 'is the model implemented correctly and does the implementation accurately represent the conceptual model?' However, to date, little operational guidance for the model verification process has been given. In this study, we aimed to create an operational checklist for model users or reviewers to verify the technical implementation of health economic decision analytical models and document their verification efforts. METHODS Literature on model validation, verification, programming errors and credibility was reviewed systematically from scientific databases. An initial beta version of the checklist was developed based on the checklists/tests identified from the literature and from authors' previous modeling/appraisal experience. Next, the first draft checklist was presented to a number of health economists on several occasions and was tested on different models (built in different software, developed by different stakeholders, including drug manufacturers, consultancies or academia), each time leading to an update of the checklist and culminating in the final version of the TECHnical VERification (TECH-VER) checklist, introduced in this paper. RESULTS The TECH-VER necessitates a model reviewer (preferably independent), an executable and transparent model, its input sources, and detailed documentation (e.g. technical report/scientific paper) in which the conceptual model, its implementation, programmed model inputs, and results are reported. The TECH-VER checklist consists of five domains: (1) input calculations; (2) event-state (patient flow) calculations; (3) result calculations; (4) uncertainty analysis calculations; and (5) other overall checks (e.g. validity or interface). The first four domains reflect the verification of the components of a typical health economic model. For these domains, as a prerequisite of verification tests, the reviewer should identify the relevant calculations in the electronic model and assess the provided justifications for the methods used in the identified calculations. For this purpose, we recommend completeness/consistency checks. Afterwards, the verification tests can be conducted for the calculations in each of these stages by checking the correctness of the implementation of these calculations. For this purpose, the following type of tests are recommended in consecutive order: (i) black-box tests, i.e. checking if model calculations are in line with a priori expectations; (ii) white-box testing, i.e. going through the program code details line by line, or cell by cell (recommended for some crucial calculations and if there are some unexpected results from the black-box tests); and (iii) model replication/parallel programming (recommended only in certain situations, and if the issues related to the identified unexpected results from black-box tests could not be resolved through white-box testing). To reduce the time burden of model verification, we suggest a hierarchical order in tests i-iii, where going to the next step is necessary when the previous step fails. CONCLUSIONS The TECH-VER checklist is a comprehensive checklist for the technical verification of decision analytical models, aiming to help identify model implementation errors and their root causes while improving the transparency and efficiency of the verification efforts. In addition to external reviews, we consider that the TECH-VER can be used as an internal training and quality control tool for new health economists, while developing their initial models. It is the authors' aim that the TECH-VER checklist transforms itself to an open-source living document, with possible future versions, or 'bolt-on' extensions for specific applications with additional 'fit-for-purpose' tests, as well as 'tips and tricks' and some demonstrative error examples. For this reason, the TECH-VER checklist and the list of black-box tests created in this paper and a few model verification examples is uploaded to an open access, online platform (github and the website of the institute), where other users will also be able to upload their original verification efforts and tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasuh C Büyükkaramikli
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Maureen P M H Rutten-van Mölken
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johan L Severens
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maiwenn Al
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Peultier AC, Redekop WK, Allen M, Peters J, Eker OF, Severens JL. Exploring the Cost-Effectiveness of Mechanical Thrombectomy Beyond 6 Hours Following Advanced Imaging in the United Kingdom. Stroke 2019; 50:3220-3227. [PMID: 31637975 PMCID: PMC6824506 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.119.026816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. In the United Kingdom, mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke patients assessed beyond 6 hours from symptom onset will be commissioned up to 12 hours provided that advanced imaging (AdvImg) demonstrates salvageable brain tissue. While the accuracy of AdvImg differs across technologies, evidence is limited regarding the proportion of patients who would benefit from late MT. We compared the cost-effectiveness of 2 care pathways: (1) MT within and beyond 6 hours based on AdvImg selection versus (2) MT only within 6 hours based on conventional imaging selection. The impact of varying AdvImg accuracy and prior probability for acute ischemic stroke patients to benefit from late MT was assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Claire Peultier
- From Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management (A.-C.P., W.K.R., J.L.S.), Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - William K Redekop
- From Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management (A.-C.P., W.K.R., J.L.S.), Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (W.K.R., J.L.S.), Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Allen
- University of Exeter Medical School, United Kingdom (M.A.).,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) South West Peninsula, United Kingdom (M.A.)
| | - Jaime Peters
- Exeter Test Group, University of Exeter Medical School, United Kingdom (J.P.)
| | - Omer Faruk Eker
- Department of Neuroradiology, Lyon University Hospital, France (O.F.E.)
| | - Johan L Severens
- From Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management (A.-C.P., W.K.R., J.L.S.), Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (W.K.R., J.L.S.), Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Knies S, Severens JL, Brouwer WBF. Integrating clinical and economic evidence in clinical guidelines: More needed than ever! J Eval Clin Pract 2019; 25:561-564. [PMID: 29700903 PMCID: PMC6767471 DOI: 10.1111/jep.12936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2018] [Accepted: 03/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES In recent years, several expensive new health technologies have been introduced. The availability of those technologies intensifies the discussion regarding the affordability of these technologies at different decision-making levels. On the meso level, both hospitals and clinicians are facing budget constraints resulting in a tension to balance between different patients' interests. As such, it is crucial to make optimal use of the available resources. Different strategies are in place to deal with this problem, but decisions on a macro level on what to fund or not can limit the role and freedom of clinicians in their decisions on a micro level. At the same time, without central guidance regarding such decisions, micro level decisions may lead to inequities and undesirable treatment variation between clinicians and hospitals. The challenge is to find instruments that can balance both levels of decision making. DISCUSSION Clinicians are becoming increasingly aware that their decisions to spend more resources (like time and budget) on 1 particular patient group reduce the resources available to other patients. Involving clinicians in thinking about the optimal use of limited resources, also in an attempt to bridge the world of economic reasoning and clinical practice, is crucial therefore. We argue that clinical guidelines may prove a clear vehicle for this by including both clinical and economic evidence to support the recommendations made. The development of such guidelines requires cooperation of clinicians, and health economists are cooperating with each other. CONCLUSION The development of clinical guidelines which combine economic and clinical evidence should be stimulated, to balance central guidance and uniformity while maintaining necessary decentralized freedom. This is an opportunity to combine the reality of budgets and opportunity costs with clinical practice. Missing this opportunity risks either variation and inequity or central and necessarily crude measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saskia Knies
- National Health Care Institute, PO Box 320, 1110 AH, Diemen, The Netherlands.,Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johan L Severens
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Institute of Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Werner B F Brouwer
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Institute of Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Grustam AS, Buyukkaramikli N, Koymans R, Vrijhoef HJM, Severens JL. Value of information analysis in telehealth for chronic heart failure management. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0218083. [PMID: 31220101 PMCID: PMC6586290 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 05/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Value of information (VOI) analysis provides information on opportunity cost of a decision in healthcare by estimating the cost of reducing parametric uncertainty and quantifying the value of generating additional evidence. This study is an application of the VOI methodology to the problem of choosing between home telemonitoring and nurse telephone support over usual care in chronic heart failure management in the Netherlands. METHODS The expected value of perfect information (EVPI) and the expected value of partially perfect information (EVPPI) analyses were based on an informal threshold of €20K per quality-adjusted life-year. These VOI-analyses were applied to a probabilistic Markov model comparing the 20-year costs and effects in three interventions. The EVPPI explored the value of decision uncertainty caused by the following group of parameters: treatment-specific transition probabilities between New York Heart Association (NYHA) defined disease states, utilities associated with the disease states, number of hospitalizations and ER visits, health state specific costs, and the distribution of patients per NYHA group. We performed the analysis for two population sizes in the Netherlands-patients in all NYHA classes of severity, and patients in NYHA IV class only. RESULTS The population EVPI for an effective population of 2,841,567 CHF patients in All NYHA classes of severity over the next 20 years is more than €4.5B, implying that further research is highly cost-effective. In the NYHA IV only analysis, for the effective population of 208,003 patients over next 20 years, the population EVPI at the same informal threshold is approx. €590M. The EVPPI analysis showed that the only relevant group of parameters that contribute to the overall decision uncertainty are transition probabilities, in both All NYHA and NYHA IV analyses. CONCLUSIONS Results of our VOI exercise show that the cost of uncertainty regarding the decision on reimbursement of telehealth interventions for chronic heart failure patients is high in the Netherlands, and that future research is needed, mainly on the transition probabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrija S. Grustam
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Professional Health Solutions & Services Department, Philips Research, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Nasuh Buyukkaramikli
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Institute of Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ron Koymans
- Professional Health Solutions & Services Department, Philips Research, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Hubertus J. M. Vrijhoef
- Department of Patient & Care, Maastricht UMC, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
- Panaxea b.v., Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johan L. Severens
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Institute of Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mauskopf J, Standaert B, Connolly MP, Culyer AJ, Garrison LP, Hutubessy R, Jit M, Pitman R, Revill P, Severens JL. Economic Analysis of Vaccination Programs: An ISPOR Good Practices for Outcomes Research Task Force Report. Value Health 2018; 21:1133-1149. [PMID: 30314613 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2018] [Accepted: 08/16/2018] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
This report provides recommendations for budget holders and decision makers in high-, middle, and low-income countries requiring economic analyses of new vaccination programs to allocate scarce resources given budget constraints. ISPOR's Economic Evaluation of Vaccines Designed to Prevent Infectious Disease: Good Practices Task Force wrote guidelines for three analytic methods and solicited comments on them from external reviewers. Cost-effectiveness analyses use decision-analytic models to estimate cumulative changes in resource use, costs, and changes in quality- or disability-adjusted life-years attributable to changes in disease outcomes. Constrained optimization modeling uses a mathematical objective function to be optimized (e.g. disease cases avoided) for a target population for a set of interventions including vaccination programs within established constraints. Fiscal health modeling estimates changes in net present value of government revenues and expenditures attributable to changes in disease outcomes. The task force recommends that those designing economic analyses for new vaccination programs take into account the decision maker's policy objectives and country-specific decision context when estimating: uptake rate in the target population; vaccination program's impact on disease cases in the population over time using a dynamic transmission epidemiologic model; vaccination program implementation and operating costs; and the changes in costs and health outcomes of the target disease(s). The three approaches to economic analysis are complementary and can be used alone or together to estimate a vaccination program's economic value for national, regional, or subregional decision makers in high-, middle-, and low-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mark P Connolly
- University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Global Market Access Solutions LLC, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Louis P Garrison
- Department of Pharmacy, The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Mark Jit
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and Public Health, London, UK
| | | | - Paul Revill
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Johan L Severens
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Institute of Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Grustam AS, Severens JL, De Massari D, Buyukkaramikli N, Koymans R, Vrijhoef HJM. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Telehealth: A Comparison between Home Telemonitoring, Nurse Telephone Support, and Usual Care in Chronic Heart Failure Management. Value Health 2018; 21:772-782. [PMID: 30005749 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2016] [Revised: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 11/30/2017] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the cost effectiveness of home telemonitoring (HTM) and nurse telephone support (NTS) compared with usual care (UC) in the management of patients with chronic heart failure, from a third-party payer's perspective. METHODS We developed a Markov model with a 20-year time horizon to analyze the cost effectiveness using the original study (Trans-European Network-Home-Care Management System) and various data sources. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the decision uncertainty in our model. RESULTS In the original scenario (which concerned the cost inputs at the time of the original study), HTM and NTS interventions yielded a difference in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained compared with UC: 2.93 and 3.07, respectively, versus 1.91. An incremental net monetary benefit analysis showed €7,697 and €13,589 in HTM and NTS versus UC at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of €20,000, and €69,100 and €83,100 at a WTP threshold of €80,000, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were €12,479 for HTM versus UC and €8,270 for NTS versus UC. The current scenario (including telenurse cost inputs in NTS) yielded results that were slightly different from those for the original scenario, when comparing all New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes of severity. NTS dominated HTM, compared with UC, in all NYHA classes except NYHA IV. CONCLUSIONS This modeling study demonstrated that HTM and NTS are viable solutions to support patients with chronic heart failure. NTS is cost-effective in comparison with UC at a WTP of €9000/QALY or higher. Like NTS, HTM improves the survival of patients in all NYHA classes and is cost-effective in comparison with UC at a WTP of €14,000/QALY or higher.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrija S Grustam
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Professional Health Solutions and Services Department, Philips Research Europe, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - Johan L Severens
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniele De Massari
- Chronic Disease Management Department, Philips Research Europe, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Nasuh Buyukkaramikli
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ron Koymans
- Professional Health Solutions and Services Department, Philips Research Europe, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Hubertus J M Vrijhoef
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Patient and Care, Maastricht UMC, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vaidya A, Kleinegris MC, Severens JL, Ramaekers BL, Ten Cate-Hoek AJ, Ten Cate H, Joore MA. Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-36 in untreated patients with symptoms of intermittent claudication. J Comp Eff Res 2018; 7:535-548. [PMID: 29855189 DOI: 10.2217/cer-2017-0029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) descriptions and utility scores in newly diagnosed peripheral arterial disease (PAD) patients, using two most widely used instruments, EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) and Medical Outcome Study 36-item Short-Form Health Status Survey (SF-36). METHODS Patients' self-assessment of HRQoL was measured by the Dutch versions of the EQ-5D and SF-36 in the 204 patients. RESULTS Mean utility scores ranged from 0.675 for Short-Form Six-Dimension, 0.648 for the EQ-5D UK tariff and 0.715 for the Dutch EQ-5D tariff. A moderate correlation between the utility scores was found due to different valuation techniques of these instruments. CONCLUSION Both instruments have clinical validity for use in the PAD and can be used alongside each other to provide a holistic assessment of the HRQoL. Before using these two instruments interchangeably for utility score calculations and healthcare resource allocation, a thorough sensitivity analysis is necessary to explore the robustness of the value argument based on these utility scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anil Vaidya
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.,GlaxoSmithKline Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada
| | - Marie-Claire Kleinegris
- Laboratory for Clinical Thrombosis & Hemostasis, Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Johan L Severens
- Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bram L Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Arina J Ten Cate-Hoek
- Laboratory for Clinical Thrombosis & Hemostasis, Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Hugo Ten Cate
- Laboratory for Clinical Thrombosis & Hemostasis, Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lenk EJ, Redekop WK, Luyendijk M, Fitzpatrick C, Niessen L, Stolk WA, Tediosi F, Rijnsburger AJ, Bakker R, Hontelez JAC, Richardus JH, Jacobson J, Le Rutte EA, de Vlas SJ, Severens JL. Socioeconomic benefit to individuals of achieving 2020 targets for four neglected tropical diseases controlled/eliminated by innovative and intensified disease management: Human African trypanosomiasis, leprosy, visceral leishmaniasis, Chagas disease. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2018; 12:e0006250. [PMID: 29534061 PMCID: PMC5849290 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2015] [Accepted: 01/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The control or elimination of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) has targets defined by the WHO for 2020, reinforced by the 2012 London Declaration. We estimated the economic impact to individuals of meeting these targets for human African trypanosomiasis, leprosy, visceral leishmaniasis and Chagas disease, NTDs controlled or eliminated by innovative and intensified disease management (IDM). METHODS A systematic literature review identified information on productivity loss and out-of-pocket payments (OPPs) related to these NTDs, which were combined with projections of the number of people suffering from each NTD, country and year for 2011-2020 and 2021-2030. The ideal scenario in which the WHO's 2020 targets are met was compared with a counterfactual scenario that assumed the situation of 1990 stayed unaltered. Economic benefit equaled the difference between the two scenarios. Values are reported in 2005 US$, purchasing power parity-adjusted, discounted at 3% per annum from 2010. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to quantify the degree of uncertainty around the base-case impact estimate. RESULTS The total global productivity gained for the four IDM-NTDs was I$ 23.1 (I$ 15.9 -I$ 34.0) billion in 2011-2020 and I$ 35.9 (I$ 25.0 -I$ 51.9) billion in 2021-2030 (2.5th and 97.5th percentiles in brackets), corresponding to US$ 10.7 billion (US$ 7.4 -US$ 15.7) and US$ 16.6 billion (US$ 11.6 -US$ 24.0). Reduction in OPPs was I$ 14 billion (US$ 6.7 billion) and I$ 18 billion (US$ 10.4 billion) for the same periods. CONCLUSIONS We faced important limitations to our work, such as finding no OPPs for leprosy. We had to combine limited data from various sources, heterogeneous background, and of variable quality. Nevertheless, based on conservative assumptions and subsequent uncertainty analyses, we estimate that the benefits of achieving the targets are considerable. Under plausible scenarios, the economic benefits far exceed the necessary investments by endemic country governments and their development partners. Given the higher frequency of NTDs among the poorest households, these investments represent good value for money in the effort to improve well-being, distribute the world's prosperity more equitably and reduce inequity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edeltraud J. Lenk
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - William K. Redekop
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne Luyendijk
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christopher Fitzpatrick
- Department of control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Louis Niessen
- Centre for Applied Health Research and Delivery, Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Wilma A. Stolk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fabrizio Tediosi
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Roel Bakker
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan A. C. Hontelez
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan H. Richardus
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Julie Jacobson
- Global Health Program, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Epke A. Le Rutte
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sake J. de Vlas
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johan L. Severens
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
van Baal P, Morton A, Severens JL. Health care input constraints and cost effectiveness analysis decision rules. Soc Sci Med 2018; 200:59-64. [PMID: 29421472 PMCID: PMC5906649 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2017] [Revised: 01/08/2018] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
Results of cost effectiveness analyses (CEA) studies are most useful for decision makers if they face only one constraint: the health care budget. However, in practice, decision makers wishing to use the results of CEA studies may face multiple resource constraints relating to, for instance, constraints in health care inputs such as a shortage of skilled labour. The presence of multiple resource constraints influences the decision rules of CEA and limits the usefulness of traditional CEA studies for decision makers. The goal of this paper is to illustrate how results of CEA can be interpreted and used in case a decision maker faces a health care input constraint. We set up a theoretical model describing the optimal allocation of the health care budget in the presence of a health care input constraint. Insights derived from that model were used to analyse a stylized example based on a decision about a surgical robot as well as a published cost effectiveness study on eye care services in Zambia. Our theoretical model shows that applying default decision rules in the presence of a health care input constraint leads to suboptimal decisions but that there are ways of preserving the traditional decision rules of CEA by reweighing different cost categories. The examples illustrate how such adjustments can be made, and makes clear that optimal decisions depend crucially on such adjustments. We conclude that it is possible to use the results of cost effectiveness studies in the presence of health care input constraints if results are properly adjusted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter van Baal
- Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Alec Morton
- University of Strathclyde, Department of Management Science, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
| | - Johan L Severens
- Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Peultier AC, Redekop K, Coche E, Severens JL. What are the images used to diagnose and assess suspected strokes?: A systematic literature review of care in four European countries. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2018; 18:177-189. [PMID: 29400089 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1429270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The cost-effectiveness of clinical interventions is often assessed using current care as comparator. However, evidence suggests practice variation in stroke imaging across countries. For the purpose of feeding into cost-effectiveness analysis, this research aims to describe the patterns of stroke imaging, examine practice variations across countries and, as such, obtain results reflecting current care. AREAS COVERED A systematic literature review was conducted to identify original studies reporting the imaging workup used in acute stroke care in clinical practice in Hungary, Germany, Sweden and the UK. Information regarding the type and frequency of stroke imaging was analysed. Computed Tomography (CT) was reported as the main diagnostic imaging modality used in stroke care (78-98% across patient profiles and time periods). This review revealed patterns that were not observed in individual studies. Comparisons of UK studies revealed considerable variations in the proportion of scanned patients and timing of imaging. EXPERT COMMENTARY While the evidence about thrombectomy is difficult to translate in clinical practice, the evidence regarding the optimal imaging approach to diagnose stroke patients is lacking. The heterogeneity in stroke imaging reinforces the need to compare the quality of stroke care within and between countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Claire Peultier
- a Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management , Erasmus University Rotterdam , Rotterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Ken Redekop
- a Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management , Erasmus University Rotterdam , Rotterdam , The Netherlands.,b Institute for Medical Technology Assessment , Erasmus University Rotterdam , Rotterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Emmanuel Coche
- c Department of Radiology , Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain , Brussels , Belgium
| | - Johan L Severens
- a Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management , Erasmus University Rotterdam , Rotterdam , The Netherlands.,b Institute for Medical Technology Assessment , Erasmus University Rotterdam , Rotterdam , The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Grustam AS, Vrijhoef H, Cordella A, Koymans R, Severens JL. Care coordination in a business-to-business and a business-to-consumer model for telemonitoring patients with chronic diseases. Int J Care Coord 2017; 20:135-147. [PMID: 29276610 PMCID: PMC5734380 DOI: 10.1177/2053434517747908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Introduction For telemonitoring to support care coordination, a sound business model is conditional. The aim of this study is to explore the systemic and economic differences in care coordination via business-to-business and business-to-consumer models for telemonitoring patients with chronic diseases. Methods We performed a literature search in order to design the business-to-business and business-to-consumer telemonitoring models, and to assess the design elements and themes by applying the activity system theory, and describe the transaction costs in each model. The design elements are content, structure, and governance, while the design themes are novelty, lock-in, complementarities, and efficiency. In the transaction cost analysis, we looked into all the elements of a transaction in both models. Results Care coordination in the business-to-business model is designed to be organized between the places of activity, rather than the participants in the activity. The design of the business-to-business model creates a firm lock-in but for a limited time. In the business-to-consumer model, the interdependencies are to be found between the persons in the care process and not between the places of care. The differences between the models were found in both the design elements and the design themes. Discussion Care coordination in the business-to-business and business-to-consumer models for telemonitoring chronic diseases differs in principle in terms of design elements and design themes. Based on the theoretical models, the transaction costs could potentially be lower in the business-to-consumer model than in the business-to-business, which could be a promoting economic principle for the implementation of telemonitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrija S Grustam
- Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Philips Research, Netherlands
| | - Hubertus Vrijhoef
- Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands Panaxea b.v., the Netherlands Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Konst EM, Prahl C, Weersink-Braks H, De Boo T, Prahl-Andersen B, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Severens JL. Cost-Effectiveness of Infant Orthopedic Treatment regarding Speech in Patients with Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Randomized Three-Center Trial in the Netherlands (Dutchcleft). Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2017; 41:71-7. [PMID: 14697066 DOI: 10.1597/02-069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the cost-effectiveness of infant orthopedic treatment (IO), compared with no such treatment in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) focusing on the effects on speech development at age 2.5 years. Design In a three-center prospective, randomized clinical trial (Dutchcleft), two groups of children with complete UCLP were followed longitudinally: one group was treated with IO based on a modified Zurich approach in the first year of life (IO group) and the other group did not receive this treatment (non-IO group). Patients The participants had complete UCLP without soft tissue bands or other malformations. They were born at term and their parents were native Dutch speakers. Outcome Measures The effect of IO on speech development at age 2.5 years was measured blindly by five expert listeners judging the “total impression of speech quality” on a 10-point equal-appearing interval scale. Costs were measured from a societal viewpoint in Euro. Results and Conclusion The IO group (n = 10) obtained a statistically significant higher rating, compared with the non-IO group (n = 10). The effect size was large, indicating that the improvement may be considered a clinically important change. The cost for treatment by the orthodontist was higher in the IO group. For both groups, the mean cost was related to the mean rating for “total impression of speech quality.” The resulting cost-effectiveness for IO, compared to non-IO was €1041 for 1.34 point speech quality improvement. The financial investment that is necessary to obtain this improvement seems limited. Thus, from the perspective of speech development, the cost-effectiveness of IO over non-IO seems acceptable at this point in time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmy M Konst
- Department of Orthodontics and Oral Biology, University Medical Centre St. Radboud, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Albuquerque De Almeida F, Al M, Koymans R, Caliskan K, Kerstens A, Severens JL. Early warning systems for the management of chronic heart failure: a systematic literature review of cost-effectiveness models. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2017; 18:161-175. [PMID: 29235882 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1417841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Describing the general and methodological characteristics of decision-analytical models used in the economic evaluation of early warning systems for the management of chronic heart failure patients and performing a quality assessment of their methodological characteristics is expected to provide concise and useful insight to inform the future development of decision-analytical models in the field of heart failure management. AREAS COVERED The literature on decision-analytical models for the economic evaluation of early warning systems for the management of chronic heart failure patients was systematically reviewed. Nine electronic databases were searched through the combination of synonyms for heart failure and sensitive filters for cost-effectiveness and early warning systems. EXPERT COMMENTARY The retrieved models show some variability with regards to their general study characteristics. Overall, they display satisfactory methodological quality, even though some points could be improved, namely on the consideration and discussion of any competing theories regarding model structure and disease progression, identification of key parameters and the use of expert opinion, and uncertainty analyses. A comprehensive definition of early warning systems and further research under this label should be pursued. To improve the transparency of economic evaluation publications, authors should make available detailed technical information regarding the published models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maiwenn Al
- a ESHPM - Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management , Erasmus University Rotterdam , Rotterdam , The Netherlands.,b iMTA - Institute for Medical Technology Assessment , Erasmus University Rotterdam , Rotterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Ron Koymans
- c Professional Health Services and Solutions , Philips Research , Eindhoven , The Netherlands
| | - Kadir Caliskan
- d Department of Cardiology , Erasmus Medical Center , Rotterdam , Netherlands
| | - Ankie Kerstens
- e MSc Student in Health Economics, Policy and Law, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management , Erasmus University Rotterdam , Rotterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Johan L Severens
- a ESHPM - Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management , Erasmus University Rotterdam , Rotterdam , The Netherlands.,b iMTA - Institute for Medical Technology Assessment , Erasmus University Rotterdam , Rotterdam , The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Grustam AS, Vrijhoef HJM, Koymans R, Hukal P, Severens JL. Assessment of a Business-to-Consumer (B2C) model for Telemonitoring patients with Chronic Heart Failure (CHF). BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017; 17:145. [PMID: 29020993 PMCID: PMC5637089 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-017-0541-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study is to assess the Business-to-Consumer (B2C) model for telemonitoring patients with Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) by analysing the value it creates, both for organizations or ventures that provide telemonitoring services based on it, and for society. METHODS The business model assessment was based on the following categories: caveats, venture type, six-factor alignment, strategic market assessment, financial viability, valuation analysis, sustainability, societal impact, and technology assessment. The venture valuation was performed for three jurisdictions (countries) - Singapore, the Netherlands and the United States - in order to show the opportunities in a small, medium-sized, and large country (i.e. population). RESULTS The business model assessment revealed that B2C telemonitoring is viable and profitable in the Innovating in Healthcare Framework. Analysis of the ecosystem revealed an average-to-excellent fit with the six factors. The structure and financing fit was average, public policy and technology alignment was good, while consumer alignment and accountability fit was deemed excellent. The financial prognosis revealed that the venture is viable and profitable in Singapore and the Netherlands but not in the United States due to relatively high salary inputs. CONCLUSIONS The B2C model in telemonitoring CHF potentially creates value for patients, shareholders of the service provider, and society. However, the validity of the results could be improved, for instance by using a peer-reviewed framework, a systematic literature search, case-based cost/efficiency inputs, and varied scenario inputs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrija S. Grustam
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Professional Healthcare Services & Solutions, Philips Research, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Hubertus J. M. Vrijhoef
- Department of Patient & Care, Maastricht UMC, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
- Panaxea b.v, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ron Koymans
- Professional Healthcare Services & Solutions, Philips Research, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Philipp Hukal
- Information Systems and Management, Warwick Business School, Coventry, UK
| | - Johan L. Severens
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- iMTA, Institute of Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hifinger M, Hiligsmann M, Ramiro S, Watson V, Berghea F, Péntek M, Keat A, Severens JL, Fautrel B, Boonen A. Influence of disease activity on RA treatment choices in countries with restricted access to expensive, innovative drugs: a discrete choice experiment among rheumatologists. RMD Open 2017; 3:e000453. [PMID: 28912960 PMCID: PMC5588932 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2017] [Revised: 06/13/2017] [Accepted: 06/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess the influence of disease activity of patients with rheumatoid arthritis on treatment choices of rheumatologists in countries with restricted access to expensive, innovative drugs. Methods Rheumatologists from Hungary, Romania and UK were invited to complete two consecutive discrete choice experiments with hypothetical drug treatments for two different patient profiles: high and moderate disease activity. Rheumatologists were asked to choose repeatedly between two unlabelled treatment options that differed in five attributes: efficacy (expected improvement and achieved disease activity state), safety (probability of serious adverse events), patient's preference (level of agreement), total medication costs and cost-effectiveness. A heteroscedastic discrete choice model using interaction terms between attribute levels and patient profiles (binary variable) was used to assess the preferences of rheumatologists towards each attribute and the influence of the patient profile. Results Overall, 148 rheumatologists completed the survey (46% females, mean age 49 years, 49% academic). For both patient profiles, efficacy dominated the treatment choice over patient's preference, safety and economic aspects. However, for patients with high compared with moderate disease activity, the importance of drug efficacy significantly increased (from 48% for moderate to 57% for high disease activity), whereas the importance of patient's preference significantly decreased (from 15% to 11%). No significant differences were observed for economic and safety considerations. Conclusion Rheumatologists were willing to give up some efficacy to account for patient's preference when choosing treatments for patients with moderate compared to high disease activity. Disease activity however did not influence importance of economic aspects in treatment choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Hifinger
- CAPHRI Research Institute,Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mickael Hiligsmann
- CAPHRI Research Institute,Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sofia Ramiro
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Verity Watson
- Health Economics Research Unit,University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Florian Berghea
- Department of Rheumatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Márta Péntek
- Department of Health Econmics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.,Department of Rheumatology, Flór Ferenc Hospital, Kistarcsa, Hungary
| | - Andrew Keat
- Arthritis Centre,Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Johan L Severens
- Institute for Health Policy and Management, Erasmus Rotterdam University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bruno Fautrel
- Department of Rheumatology, Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Annelies Boonen
- CAPHRI Research Institute,Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Burgers LT, Redekop WK, Al MJ, Lhachimi SK, Armstrong N, Walker S, Rothery C, Westwood M, Severens JL. Cost-effectiveness analysis of new generation coronary CT scanners for difficult-to-image patients. Eur J Health Econ 2017; 18:731-742. [PMID: 27650359 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-016-0824-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2015] [Accepted: 08/04/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
AIMS New generation dual-source coronary CT (NGCCT) scanners with more than 64 slices were evaluated for patients with (known) or suspected of coronary artery disease (CAD) who are difficult to image: obese, coronary calcium score > 400, arrhythmias, previous revascularization, heart rate > 65 beats per minute, and intolerance of betablocker. A cost-effectiveness analysis of NGCCT compared with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) was performed for these difficult-to-image patients for England and Wales. METHODS AND RESULTS Five models (diagnostic decision model, four Markov models for CAD progression, stroke, radiation and general population) were integrated to estimate the cost-effectiveness of NGCCT for both suspected and known CAD populations. The lifetime costs and effects from the National Health Service perspective were estimated for three strategies: (1) patients diagnosed using ICA, (2) using NGCCT, and (3) patients diagnosed using a combination of NGCCT and, if positive, followed by ICA. In the suspected population, the strategy where patients only undergo a NGCCT is a cost-effective option at accepted cost-effectiveness thresholds. The strategy of using NGCCT in combination with ICA is the most favourable strategy for patients with known CAD. The most influential factors behind these results are the percentage of patients being misclassified (a function of both diagnostic accuracy and the prior likelihood), the complication rates of the procedures, and the cost price of a NGCCT scan. CONCLUSION The use of NGCCT might be considered cost-effective in both populations since it is cost-saving compared to ICA and generates similar effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L T Burgers
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - W K Redekop
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M J Al
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S K Lhachimi
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Research Group for Evidence-Based Public Health, BIPS -Leibniz-Institute für Prevention Research und Epidemiology, Bremen, Germany
| | | | - S Walker
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - C Rothery
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - M Westwood
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
| | - J L Severens
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ramaekers BLT, Riemsma R, Tomini F, van Asselt T, Deshpande S, Duffy S, Armstrong N, Severens JL, Kleijnen J, Joore MA. Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding "Abiraterone Acetate for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Naïve Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal". Pharmacoeconomics 2017; 35:665-667. [PMID: 28391508 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-017-0507-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Florian Tomini
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Thea van Asselt
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Johan L Severens
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, iMTA-Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
- School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ceornodolea AD, Bal R, Severens JL. Epidemiology and Management of Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke: Review of Data from Four European Countries. Stroke Res Treat 2017; 2017:8593207. [PMID: 28634569 PMCID: PMC5467327 DOI: 10.1155/2017/8593207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2016] [Revised: 03/13/2017] [Accepted: 04/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
In Europe, 1-3% of the population suffers from atrial fibrillation (AF) and has increased stroke risk. By 2060 a doubling in number of cases and great burden in managing this medical condition are expected. This paper offers an overview of data on epidemiology and management of AF and stroke in four European countries as well as the interconnection between these dimensions. A search index was developed to access multiple scientific and "grey" literatures. Information was prioritised based on strength of evidence and date. Information on country reports was double-checked with national experts. The overall prevalence of AF is consistent across countries. France has the lowest stroke incidence and mortality, followed by Netherland and UK, while Romania has higher rates. GPs or medical specialists are responsible for AF treatment; exception are the special thrombosis services in the Netherlands. Prevention measurements are only present in UK through screening programs. Although international and national guidelines are available, undertreatment is present in all countries. Despite differences in healthcare systems and management of AF, epidemiology is comparable between three of the countries. Romania is an outlier, by being limited in data accessibility. This knowledge can contribute to improved AF care in Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreea D. Ceornodolea
- eMbrace Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Postbus 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Roland Bal
- Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Postbus 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Johan L. Severens
- Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Postbus 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Houben E, van Haalen HGM, Sparreboom W, Overbeek JA, Ezendam NPM, Pijnenborg JMA, Severens JL, van Herk-Sukel MPP. Chemotherapy for ovarian cancer in the Netherlands: a population-based study on treatment patterns and outcomes. Med Oncol 2017; 34:50. [PMID: 28224447 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-017-0901-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Information on treatment patterns for ovarian cancer (OC) is limited. The aim of this study was to describe current patterns of chemotherapy and other systemic treatments for OC in the Netherlands and evaluate survival outcomes following subsequent lines of treatment. Data from the Eindhoven Cancer Registry, including on newly diagnosed cancer patients, were linked to the PHARMO Database Network, including information on in- and out-patient drug use. Patients diagnosed with OC between January 2000 and December 2010 were selected. An algorithm was used to identify separate lines of treatment. Data were studied descriptively. Detailed data on systemic drug use were available for 261 patients (17%) with OC. In first-line treatment, 87% of the patients (227/261) received platinum-based chemotherapy. Of the 161 patients receiving second-line treatment, 101 patients (63%) received platinum-based chemotherapy. In third line, this was 51% (53/103). The median number of treatment lines received by patients was two (interquartile range 1-3), and eight or more lines of chemotherapy were identified for 12 patients. Median survival from diagnosis onwards was 47 months from the end of first-line treatment, median survival was 32 months, and from the end of second-line treatment, it was 14 months. Predominantly beyond second-line treatment, there is much variety in treatment patterns with chemotherapy for OC. Although uncertainty remains regarding the desirability of this observed treatment variation, there seems a need for detailed clinical guidance, assuring that physicians can properly choose the most suitable treatment for each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Houben
- PHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Van Deventerlaan 30-40, 3528 AE, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - H G M van Haalen
- AstraZeneca BV, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands.,Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - J A Overbeek
- PHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Van Deventerlaan 30-40, 3528 AE, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - N P M Ezendam
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - J M A Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J L Severens
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M P P van Herk-Sukel
- PHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Van Deventerlaan 30-40, 3528 AE, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ramaekers BLT, Riemsma R, Tomini F, van Asselt T, Deshpande S, Duffy S, Armstrong N, Severens JL, Kleijnen J, Joore MA. Abiraterone Acetate for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Naïve Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of an NICE Single Technology Appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics 2017; 35:191-202. [PMID: 27566699 PMCID: PMC5253156 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-016-0445-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited Janssen, the company manufacturing abiraterone acetate (AA; tradename Zytiga®), to submit evidence for the clinical and cost effectiveness of AA in combination with prednisone/prednisolone (AAP) compared with watchful waiting (i.e. best supportive care [BSC]) for chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd (KSR), in collaboration with Maastricht University Medical Center, was commissioned as the Evidence Review Group (ERG). This paper presents a summary of the company submission (CS), the ERG report, subsequent addenda, and the development of the NICE guidance for the use of this drug in England and Wales by the Appraisal Committee (AC). The ERG produced a critical review of the clinical and cost effectiveness of AAP based on the CS. An important question in this appraisal was, according to the ERG, whether AAP followed by docetaxel is more effective than BSC followed by docetaxel. In the COU-AA-302 trial, 239 of 546 (43.8 %) AAP patients and 304 of 542 (56.1 %) BSC patients received docetaxel as subsequent therapy, following AA or placebo. The results for this specific group of patients were not presented in the CS; therefore, the ERG asked the company to provide these data in the clarification letter; however, these data were presented as commercial-in-confidence and cannot therefore be reported here. The ERG's critical assessment of the company's economic evaluation highlighted a number of concerns, including (a) not using the intention-to-treat (ITT) population; (b) inconsistencies in estimating prediction equations; (c) not fully incorporating the impact of adverse events; (d) incorrectly incorporating the new patient access scheme (PAS); and (e) the assumption that AA non-compliance leads to recoverable drug costs. Although some of these issues were adjusted in the ERG base case, the ERG could not estimate the impact of all of these issues, and thus acknowledges that there are still uncertainties concerning the cost-effectiveness evidence. With the exception of the ERG's preference for using the ITT population, the AC agreed with the approach taken in the ERG base case. The original company and ERG base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were £46,722 and £57,688 per QALY gained, respectively; these changed to £28,563 and £38,061 per QALY gained, respectively, in the revised base cases applying a new PAS. Regarding the end-of-life criteria, after 24 months approximately 63 % of patients in the control group of the COU-AA-302 trial were still alive, and the median survival was 30.1 months (95 % CI 27.3-34.1). Therefore, it is unlikely that life expectancy would be less than 24 months. The AC stated that the most plausible ICER is likely between £28,600 and £32,800 per QALY gained, and concluded that AAP at this stage in the treatment pathway did not meet the end-of-life criterion for short life expectancy. Moreover, in March 2016, the AC produced the final guidance, stating that AAP is recommended, within its marketing authorisation, as an option for treating mCRPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Florian Tomini
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Thea van Asselt
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Johan L Severens
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, iMTA-Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
- School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Redekop WK, Lenk EJ, Luyendijk M, Fitzpatrick C, Niessen L, Stolk WA, Tediosi F, Rijnsburger AJ, Bakker R, Hontelez JAC, Richardus JH, Jacobson J, de Vlas SJ, Severens JL. The Socioeconomic Benefit to Individuals of Achieving the 2020 Targets for Five Preventive Chemotherapy Neglected Tropical Diseases. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2017; 11:e0005289. [PMID: 28103243 PMCID: PMC5313231 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2015] [Revised: 02/16/2017] [Accepted: 12/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lymphatic filariasis (LF), onchocerciasis, schistosomiasis, soil-transmitted helminths (STH) and trachoma represent the five most prevalent neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). They can be controlled or eliminated by means of safe and cost-effective interventions delivered through programs of Mass Drug Administration (MDA)-also named Preventive Chemotherapy (PCT). The WHO defined targets for NTD control/elimination by 2020, reinforced by the 2012 London Declaration, which, if achieved, would result in dramatic health gains. We estimated the potential economic benefit of achieving these targets, focusing specifically on productivity and out-of-pocket payments. METHODS Productivity loss was calculated by combining disease frequency with productivity loss from the disease, from the perspective of affected individuals. Productivity gain was calculated by deducting the total loss expected in the target achievement scenario from the loss in a counterfactual scenario where it was assumed the pre-intervention situation in 1990 regarding NTDs would continue unabated until 2030. Economic benefits from out-of-pocket payments (OPPs) were calculated similarly. Benefits are reported in 2005 US$ (purchasing power parity-adjusted and discounted at 3% per annum from 2010). Sensitivity analyses were used to assess the influence of changes in input parameters. RESULTS The economic benefit from productivity gain was estimated to be I$251 billion in 2011-2020 and I$313 billion in 2021-2030, considerably greater than the total OPPs averted of I$0.72 billion and I$0.96 billion in the same periods. The net benefit is expected to be US$ 27.4 and US$ 42.8 for every dollar invested during the same periods. Impact varies between NTDs and regions, since it is determined by disease prevalence and extent of disease-related productivity loss. CONCLUSION Achieving the PCT-NTD targets for 2020 will yield significant economic benefits to affected individuals. Despite large uncertainty, these benefits far exceed the investment required by governments and their development partners within all reasonable scenarios. Given the concentration of the NTDs among the poorest households, these investments represent good value for money in efforts to share the world's prosperity and reduce inequity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William K. Redekop
- Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Edeltraud J. Lenk
- Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne Luyendijk
- Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Louis Niessen
- Centre for Applied Health Research and Delivery, Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Wilma A. Stolk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fabrizio Tediosi
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Roel Bakker
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan A. C. Hontelez
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan H. Richardus
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Julie Jacobson
- Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Sake J. de Vlas
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johan L. Severens
- Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hifinger M, Hiligsmann M, Ramiro S, Severens JL, Fautrel B, Watson V, Boonen A. Patients' preferences and economic considerations play an important role in treatment decisions: a discrete choice experiment among rheumatologists. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016; 56:68-76. [PMID: 28028156 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2015] [Revised: 08/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate to what extent rheumatologists consider economic aspects and patients' preferences when choosing drug treatments in patients with active RA. METHODS In a discrete choice experiment, rheumatologists were asked to choose between two unlabelled drug treatment options for a hypothetical RA patient with moderate disease activity who failed two synthetic DMARDs. Attributes and levels of drug treatments were selected based on existing literature, rheumatologists' opinion and expert consensus. This resulted in five attributes each described by three levels: efficacy (level of improvement and achieved state on DAS28), safety (probability of a serious adverse event), patients' preference (level of agreement), annual medication costs and cost-effectiveness (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio). An efficient experimental design generated 14 treatment choices and a random parameter logit model estimated the relative importance of attributes. RESULTS Sixty-three rheumatologists from the Netherlands contributed to the analysis; 44% were female and mean (sd) age was 49 (8) years. Drug efficacy had the strongest relative contribution to the drug choice (44%) followed by medication costs (24%), patients' preference (17%) and cost-effectiveness (14%). Patients' preferences were most relevant when patients disliked a proposed treatment. The risk of serious but uncommon or rare side effects only played a minor role in the treatment choice (1%). CONCLUSION In addition to drug efficacy, rheumatologists account for economic aspects and for patients' preferences when deciding on drugs. Decisions are more influenced by absolute costs than relative cost-effectiveness and by patients' disliking as opposed to favouring the treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Hifinger
- CAPHRI Research Institute, Maastricht University .,Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre
| | - Mickael Hiligsmann
- CAPHRI Research Institute, Maastricht University.,Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht
| | - Sofia Ramiro
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - Johan L Severens
- Institute for Health Policy and Management, Erasmus Rotterdam University, Rotterdam.,iMTA-Institute of Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus Rotterdam University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bruno Fautrel
- GRC 08, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, AP-HP, Department of Rheumatology, Pitie Salpetriere Hospital Paris, Pierre et Marie Curie University, France and
| | - Verity Watson
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Annelies Boonen
- CAPHRI Research Institute, Maastricht University.,Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten J Deenen
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Annemieke Cats
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jos H Beijnen
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jan H M Schellens
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Berkowitz FE, Severens JL, Blumberg HM. Exposure to Tuberculosis among Newborns in a Nursery: Decision Analysis for Initiation of Prophylaxis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016; 27:604-11. [PMID: 16755481 DOI: 10.1086/504359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2004] [Accepted: 01/31/2005] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Objective.Newborns in a hospital nursery were exposed to a mother whose sputum was direct-smear negative for acid-fast bacilli but culture positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Given the low risk for exposure, the high susceptibility of infants to M. tuberculosis infection, and the possibility of hepatotoxicity due to isoniazid therapy, a decision analysis model was used to determine whether administration of isoniazid prophylaxis against tuberculosis is preferable to no administration of prophylaxis.Design.A decision analysis tree was constructed with software, using probabilities from the literature and costs from local health facilities. The expected values for each strategy were obtained, and sensitivity analyses were performed.Results.For the strategy in which prophylaxis was administered under direct observation (DO), the probability for survival was 0.999980. For the strategy in which no prophylaxis was administered, the probability of survival was 0.999950, which corresponds to 3 more deaths per 100,000 patients than with the DO prophylaxis strategy. The incremental cost-effectiveness of the DO prophylaxis strategy was $21,710,000 per death prevented. Sensitivity analysis for survival showed that the DO prophylaxis strategy was preferable to the strategy in which no prophylaxis is given if the probability of infection was >0.0002, the probability of tuberculous disease in an infected infant who did not receive prophylaxis was greater than 0.12, the probability of dying from tuberculosis was greater than 0.025, the probability of hepatotoxicity was less than 0.004, and the probability of dying from hepatotoxicity was less than 0.04. For the strategy in which prophylaxis was administered under non-DO conditions (ie, by parents), the incremental cost-effectiveness was $929,500 per death prevented, which is approximately 5% of the incremental cost-effectiveness of the DO prophylaxis strategy.Conclusion.This model provides a structure for determining the preferable prophylaxis strategies for different risks of exposure to tuberculosis in a nursery. Administration of prophylaxis is preferable to no administration of prophylaxis, unless the probability of infection is extremely low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank E Berkowitz
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Handels RL, Joore MA, Vos SJ, Aalten P, Ramakers IH, Rikkert MO, Scheltens P, Jansen WJ, Visser PJ, van Berckel BM, van Domburg P, Smid M, Hoff E, Hoogmoed J, Bouwman F, Claassen J, Leentjens AF, Wolfs CA, Severens JL, Verhey FR. Added Prognostic Value of Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Predicting Decline in Memory Clinic Patients in a Prospective Cohort. J Alzheimers Dis 2016; 52:875-85. [DOI: 10.3233/jad-151120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ron L.H. Handels
- Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Department of Health Organization, Policy and Economics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Manuela A. Joore
- CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Department of Health Organization, Policy and Economics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Stephanie J.B. Vos
- Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Pauline Aalten
- Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Inez H.G.B. Ramakers
- Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel Olde Rikkert
- Radboudumc Alzheimer Centre, Department of Geriatrics, Donders Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Centre, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willemijn J. Jansen
- Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter-Jelle Visser
- Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Centre, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart M.N. van Berckel
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Centre, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter van Domburg
- Department of Neurology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands
| | - Machiel Smid
- Department of Geriatrics, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Hoff
- Department of Neurology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Hoogmoed
- Department of Geriatrics, Laurentius Hospital Roermond, Roermond, The Netherlands
- Department of Geriatrics, St. Jans Gasthuis Weert, Weert, The Netherlands
| | - Femke Bouwman
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Centre, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurgen Claassen
- Radboudumc Alzheimer Centre, Department of Geriatrics, Donders Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Albert F.G. Leentjens
- Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Claire A.G. Wolfs
- Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Johan L. Severens
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frans R.J. Verhey
- Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hifinger M, Hiligsmann M, Ramiro S, Watson V, Severens JL, Fautrel B, Uhlig T, van Vollenhoven R, Jacques P, Detert J, Canas da Silva J, Scirè CA, Berghea F, Carmona L, Péntek M, Keat A, Boonen A. Economic considerations and patients' preferences affect treatment selection for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a discrete choice experiment among European rheumatologists. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 76:126-132. [PMID: 27190098 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2016] [Revised: 03/27/2016] [Accepted: 04/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the value that rheumatologists across Europe attach to patients' preferences and economic aspects when choosing treatments for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS In a discrete choice experiment, European rheumatologists chose between two hypothetical drug treatments for a patient with moderate disease activity. Treatments differed in five attributes: efficacy (improvement and achieved state on disease activity), safety (probability of serious adverse events), patient's preference (level of agreement), medication costs and cost-effectiveness (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)). A Bayesian efficient design defined 14 choice sets, and a random parameter logit model was used to estimate relative preferences for rheumatologists across countries. Cluster analyses and latent class models were applied to understand preference patterns across countries and among individual rheumatologists. RESULTS Responses of 559 rheumatologists from 12 European countries were included in the analysis (49% females, mean age 48 years). In all countries, efficacy dominated treatment decisions followed by economic considerations and patients' preferences. Across countries, rheumatologists avoided selecting a treatment that patients disliked. Latent class models revealed four respondent profiles: one traded off all attributes except safety, and the remaining three classes disregarded ICER. Among individual rheumatologists, 57% disregarded ICER and these were more likely from Italy, Romania, Portugal or France, whereas 43% disregarded uncommon/rare side effects and were more likely from Belgium, Germany, Hungary, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden or UK. CONCLUSIONS Overall, European rheumatologists are willing to trade between treatment efficacy, patients' treatment preferences and economic considerations. However, the degree of trade-off differs between countries and among individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Hifinger
- CAPHRI Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - M Hiligsmann
- CAPHRI Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - S Ramiro
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - V Watson
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - J L Severens
- Institute for Health Policy and Management, Erasmus Rotterdam University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B Fautrel
- Department of Rheumatology, University Paris 6, GRC-UPMC08, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health-AP-HP, Pitie Salpetriere University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - T Uhlig
- National Advisory Unit for Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - R van Vollenhoven
- Unit for Clinical Therapy Research Inflammatory Diseases, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Jacques
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - J Detert
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - J Canas da Silva
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal
| | - C A Scirè
- Epidemiology Unit, Italian Society for Rheumatology, Milan, Italy
| | - F Berghea
- Department of Rheumatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania
| | - L Carmona
- Department of Rheumatology, Instituto de Salud Musculoesqueletica, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Péntek
- Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.,Department of Rheumatology, Flór Ferenc Hospital, Kistarcsa, Hungary
| | - A Keat
- Arthritis Centre, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - A Boonen
- CAPHRI Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Frederix GW, Severens JL, Hövels AM. Use of quality checklists and need for disease-specific guidance in economic evaluations: a meta-review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2016; 15:675-85. [PMID: 26176753 DOI: 10.1586/14737167.2015.1069185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Economic evaluations have become an essential part of reimbursement decisions in a wide range of countries. To ensure high quality, a variety of checklists with different purposes have been developed and implemented enabling assessment of these evaluations. Three of these checklists are most frequently used and are recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews for critical appraisal (Drummond, CHEC and Philips). Every checklist is developed with a different purpose having, for example, a focus on reporting or conducting and on modeling or trial-based evaluations. This review outlines the heterogeneity in choice and implementation of these quality checklists in an incorrect manner. This ultimately results in under- and even possibly overestimation of quality of included economic evaluations. More guidance in selecting correct checklists suiting the purpose of the quality check is therefore of utmost importance. Moreover, it appears that current checklists are lacking detailed disease-specific guidance resulting in models not correctly reflecting disease progression. Therefore, outcomes indicate that the problem of the wide variability of methodological choices is prevalent in some other disease areas too, regardless of the availability of quality checklists. More international collaboration should therefore be initiated in developing and publishing standardized and open source disease-specific reference models to overcome this problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerardus Wj Frederix
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lenk EJ, Redekop WK, Luyendijk M, Rijnsburger AJ, Severens JL. Productivity Loss Related to Neglected Tropical Diseases Eligible for Preventive Chemotherapy: A Systematic Literature Review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2016; 10:e0004397. [PMID: 26890487 PMCID: PMC4758606 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2015] [Accepted: 12/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) not only cause health and life expectancy loss, but can also lead to economic consequences including reduced ability to work. This article describes a systematic literature review of the effect on the economic productivity of individuals affected by one of the five worldwide most prevalent NTDs: lymphatic filariasis, onchocerciasis, schistosomiasis, soil-transmitted helminths (ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm infection) and trachoma. These diseases are eligible to preventive chemotherapy (PCT). METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Eleven bibliographic databases were searched using different names of all NTDs and various keywords relating to productivity. Additional references were identified through reference lists from relevant papers. Of the 5316 unique publications found in the database searches, thirteen papers were identified for lymphatic filariasis, ten for onchocerciasis, eleven for schistosomiasis, six for soil-transmitted helminths and three for trachoma. Besides the scarcity in publications reporting the degree of productivity loss, this review revealed large variation in the estimated productivity loss related to these NTDs. CONCLUSIONS It is clear that productivity is affected by NTDs, although the actual impact depends on the type and severity of the NTD as well as on the context where the disease occurs. The largest impact on productivity loss of individuals affected by one of these diseases seems to be due to blindness from onchocerciasis and severe schistosomiasis manifestations; productivity loss due to trachoma-related blindness has never been studied directly. However, productivity loss at an individual level might differ from productivity loss at a population level because of differences in the prevalence of NTDs. Variation in estimated productivity loss between and within diseases is caused by differences in research methods and setting. Publications should provide enough information to enable readers to assess the quality and relevance of the study for their purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edeltraud J. Lenk
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - William K. Redekop
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne Luyendijk
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Johan L. Severens
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Burgers LT, van de Wetering FT, Severens JL, Redekop WK. Using meta-regression analyses in addition to conventional systematic review methods to examine the variation in cost-effectiveness results - a case study. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16:23. [PMID: 26791941 PMCID: PMC4719667 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-1230-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2015] [Accepted: 12/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Systematic reviews of cost-effectiveness analyses summarize results and describe study characteristics. Variability in the study results is often explained qualitatively or based on sensitivity analyses of individual studies. However, variability due to input parameters and study characteristics (e.g., funding or study quality) is often not statistically explained. As a case study, a systematic review on the cost-effectiveness of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) using meta-regression analyses is performed to explore the usefulness of such methods compared with conventional review methods. Methods We attempted to identify and review all modelling studies published until January 2012 that compared costs and consequences of DES versus BMS. We extracted general study information (e.g., funding), modelling methods, values of input parameters, and quality of the model using the Philips et al. checklist. Associations between study characteristics and the incremental costs and effectiveness of individual analyses were explored using regression analyses corrected for study ID. Results Sixteen eligible studies were identified, with a combined total of 508 analyses. The overall quality of the models was moderate (59 % ± 15 %). This study showed associations (e.g., type of lesion) that were expected (based on individual studies), however the meta-regression analyses revealed also unpredicted associations: e.g., model quality was negatively associated with repeat revascularizations avoided. Conclusions Meta-regressions can be of added value, identifying significant associations that could not be identified using conventional review methods or by sensitivity analyses of individual studies. Furthermore, this study underlines the need to examine input parameters and perform a quality check of studies when interpreting the results. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1230-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura T Burgers
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. .,Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Fleur T van de Wetering
- Cochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johan L Severens
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W Ken Redekop
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Burgers LT, McClellan EA, Hoefer IE, Pasterkamp G, Jukema JW, Horsman S, Pijls NHJ, Waltenberger J, Hillaert MA, Stubbs AC, Severens JL, Redekop WK. Treatment variation in stent choice in patients with stable or unstable coronary artery disease. Neth Heart J 2016; 24:110-9. [PMID: 26762359 PMCID: PMC4722012 DOI: 10.1007/s12471-015-0783-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Variations in treatment are the result of differences in demographic and clinical factors (e.g. anatomy), but physician and hospital factors may also contribute to treatment variation. The choice of treatment is considered important since it could lead to differences in long-term outcomes. This study explores the associations with stent choice: i.e. drug-eluting stent (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) for Dutch patients diagnosed with stable or unstable coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS & RESULTS Associations with treatment decisions were based on a prospective cohort of 692 patients with stable or unstable CAD. Of those patients, 442 patients were treated with BMS or DES. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify variables associated with stent choice. Bivariate analyses showed that NYHA class, number of diseased vessels, previous percutaneous coronary intervention, smoking, diabetes, and the treating hospital were associated with stent type. After correcting for other associations the treating hospital remained significantly associated with stent type in the stable CAD population. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that several factors were associated with stent choice. While patients generally appear to receive the most optimal stent given their clinical characteristics, stent choice seems partially determined by the treating hospital, which may lead to differences in long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L T Burgers
- Institute of Health Policy & Management, and Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - E A McClellan
- Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - I E Hoefer
- Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - G Pasterkamp
- Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J W Jukema
- Department of Cardiology, Leiden UMC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - S Horsman
- Department of Bioinformatics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N H J Pijls
- Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - J Waltenberger
- Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - M A Hillaert
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A C Stubbs
- Department of Bioinformatics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J L Severens
- Institute of Health Policy & Management, and Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W K Redekop
- Institute of Health Policy & Management, and Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Blommestein HM, Armstrong N, Ryder S, Deshpande S, Worthy G, Noake C, Riemsma R, Kleijnen J, Severens JL, Al MJ. Lenalidomide for the Treatment of Low- or Intermediate-1-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Associated with Deletion 5q Cytogenetic Abnormality: An Evidence Review of the NICE Submission from Celgene. Pharmacoeconomics 2016; 34:23-31. [PMID: 26314282 PMCID: PMC4706836 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-015-0318-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited the manufacturer of lenalidomide (Celgene) to submit evidence of the clinical and cost effectiveness of the drug for treating adults with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) associated with deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality, as part of the Institute's single technology appraisal (STA) process. Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd (KSR), in collaboration with Erasmus University Rotterdam, was commissioned to act as the Evidence Review Group (ERG). This paper describes the company's submission, the ERG review, and the NICE's subsequent decisions. The ERG reviewed the evidence for clinical and cost effectiveness of the technology, as submitted by the manufacturer to the NICE. The ERG searched for relevant additional evidence and validated the manufacturer's decision analytic model to examine the robustness of the cost-effectiveness results. Clinical effectiveness was obtained from a three-arm, European, randomized, phase III trial among red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent patients with low-/intermediate-1-risk del5q31 MDS. The primary endpoint was RBC independence for ≥26 weeks, and was reached by a higher proportion of patients in the lenalidomide 10 and 5 mg groups compared with placebo (56.1 and 42.6 vs 5.9 %, respectively; both p < 0.001). The option of dose adjustments after 16 weeks due to dose-limiting toxicities or lack of response made long-term effectiveness estimates unreliable, e.g. overall survival (OS). The de novo model of the manufacturer included a Markov state-transition cost-utility model implemented in Microsoft Excel. The base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the manufacturer was £56,965. The ERG assessment indicated that the modeling structure represented the course of the disease; however, a few errors were identified and some of the input parameters were challenged. In response to the appraisal documentation, the company revised the economic model, which increased the ICER to £68,125 per quality-adjusted life-year. The NICE Appraisal Committee (AC) did not recommend lenalidomide as a cost-effective treatment. Subsequently, the manufacturer submitted a Patient Access Scheme (PAS) that provided lenalidomide free of charge for patients who remained on treatment after 26 cycles. This PAS improved the ICER to £25,300, although the AC considered the proportion of patients who received treatment beyond 26 cycles, and hence the ICER, to be uncertain. Nevertheless, the AC accepted a commitment from the manufacturer to publish, once available, data on the proportion of patients eligible for the PAS, and believed this provided reassurance that lenalidomide was a cost-effective treatment for low- or intermediate-1-risk MDS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hedwig M Blommestein
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Room No. J8-23, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Nigel Armstrong
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, Unit 6, Escrick Business Park, Escrick, York, YO19 6FD, UK
| | - Steve Ryder
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, Unit 6, Escrick Business Park, Escrick, York, YO19 6FD, UK
| | - Sohan Deshpande
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, Unit 6, Escrick Business Park, Escrick, York, YO19 6FD, UK
| | - Gill Worthy
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, Unit 6, Escrick Business Park, Escrick, York, YO19 6FD, UK
| | - Caro Noake
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, Unit 6, Escrick Business Park, Escrick, York, YO19 6FD, UK
| | - Rob Riemsma
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, Unit 6, Escrick Business Park, Escrick, York, YO19 6FD, UK
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, Unit 6, Escrick Business Park, Escrick, York, YO19 6FD, UK
- School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Johan L Severens
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Room No. J8-23, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maiwenn J Al
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Room No. J8-23, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Deenen MJ, Meulendijks D, Cats A, Sechterberger MK, Severens JL, Boot H, Smits PH, Rosing H, Mandigers CMPW, Soesan M, Beijnen JH, Schellens JHM. Upfront Genotyping of DPYD*2A to Individualize Fluoropyrimidine Therapy: A Safety and Cost Analysis. J Clin Oncol 2015; 34:227-34. [PMID: 26573078 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.63.1325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 233] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Fluoropyrimidines are frequently prescribed anticancer drugs. A polymorphism in the fluoropyrimidine metabolizing enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD; ie, DPYD*2A) is strongly associated with fluoropyrimidine-induced severe and life-threatening toxicity. This study determined the feasibility, safety, and cost of DPYD*2A genotype-guided dosing. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients intended to be treated with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy were prospectively genotyped for DPYD*2A before start of therapy. Variant allele carriers received an initial dose reduction of ≥ 50% followed by dose titration based on tolerance. Toxicity was the primary end point and was compared with historical controls (ie, DPYD*2A variant allele carriers receiving standard dose described in literature) and with DPYD*2A wild-type patients treated with the standard dose in this study. Secondary end points included a model-based cost analysis, as well as pharmacokinetic and DPD enzyme activity analyses. RESULTS A total of 2,038 patients were prospectively screened for DPYD*2A, of whom 22 (1.1%) were heterozygous polymorphic. DPYD*2A variant allele carriers were treated with a median dose-intensity of 48% (range, 17% to 91%). The risk of grade ≥ 3 toxicity was thereby significantly reduced from 73% (95% CI, 58% to 85%) in historical controls (n = 48) to 28% (95% CI, 10% to 53%) by genotype-guided dosing (P < .001); drug-induced death was reduced from 10% to 0%. Adequate treatment of genotype-guided dosing was further demonstrated by a similar incidence of grade ≥ 3 toxicity compared with wild-type patients receiving the standard dose (23%; P = .64) and by similar systemic fluorouracil (active drug) exposure. Furthermore, average total treatment cost per patient was lower for screening (€2,772 [$3,767]) than for nonscreening (€2,817 [$3,828]), outweighing screening costs. CONCLUSION DPYD*2A is strongly associated with fluoropyrimidine-induced severe and life-threatening toxicity. DPYD*2A genotype-guided dosing results in adequate systemic drug exposure and significantly improves safety of fluoropyrimidine therapy for the individual patient. On a population level, upfront genotyping seemed cost saving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten J Deenen
- Maarten J. Deenen, Didier Meulendijks, Annemieke Cats, Marjolein K. Sechterberger, Henk Boot, Hilde Rosing, Jos H. Beijnen, and Jan H.M. Schellens, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Paul H. Smits and Marcel Soesan, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam; Johan L. Severens, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Caroline M.P.W. Mandigers, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen; and Jos H. Beijnen and Jan H.M. Schellens, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Didier Meulendijks
- Maarten J. Deenen, Didier Meulendijks, Annemieke Cats, Marjolein K. Sechterberger, Henk Boot, Hilde Rosing, Jos H. Beijnen, and Jan H.M. Schellens, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Paul H. Smits and Marcel Soesan, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam; Johan L. Severens, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Caroline M.P.W. Mandigers, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen; and Jos H. Beijnen and Jan H.M. Schellens, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Annemieke Cats
- Maarten J. Deenen, Didier Meulendijks, Annemieke Cats, Marjolein K. Sechterberger, Henk Boot, Hilde Rosing, Jos H. Beijnen, and Jan H.M. Schellens, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Paul H. Smits and Marcel Soesan, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam; Johan L. Severens, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Caroline M.P.W. Mandigers, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen; and Jos H. Beijnen and Jan H.M. Schellens, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein K Sechterberger
- Maarten J. Deenen, Didier Meulendijks, Annemieke Cats, Marjolein K. Sechterberger, Henk Boot, Hilde Rosing, Jos H. Beijnen, and Jan H.M. Schellens, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Paul H. Smits and Marcel Soesan, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam; Johan L. Severens, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Caroline M.P.W. Mandigers, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen; and Jos H. Beijnen and Jan H.M. Schellens, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Johan L Severens
- Maarten J. Deenen, Didier Meulendijks, Annemieke Cats, Marjolein K. Sechterberger, Henk Boot, Hilde Rosing, Jos H. Beijnen, and Jan H.M. Schellens, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Paul H. Smits and Marcel Soesan, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam; Johan L. Severens, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Caroline M.P.W. Mandigers, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen; and Jos H. Beijnen and Jan H.M. Schellens, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Henk Boot
- Maarten J. Deenen, Didier Meulendijks, Annemieke Cats, Marjolein K. Sechterberger, Henk Boot, Hilde Rosing, Jos H. Beijnen, and Jan H.M. Schellens, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Paul H. Smits and Marcel Soesan, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam; Johan L. Severens, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Caroline M.P.W. Mandigers, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen; and Jos H. Beijnen and Jan H.M. Schellens, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Paul H Smits
- Maarten J. Deenen, Didier Meulendijks, Annemieke Cats, Marjolein K. Sechterberger, Henk Boot, Hilde Rosing, Jos H. Beijnen, and Jan H.M. Schellens, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Paul H. Smits and Marcel Soesan, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam; Johan L. Severens, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Caroline M.P.W. Mandigers, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen; and Jos H. Beijnen and Jan H.M. Schellens, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hilde Rosing
- Maarten J. Deenen, Didier Meulendijks, Annemieke Cats, Marjolein K. Sechterberger, Henk Boot, Hilde Rosing, Jos H. Beijnen, and Jan H.M. Schellens, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Paul H. Smits and Marcel Soesan, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam; Johan L. Severens, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Caroline M.P.W. Mandigers, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen; and Jos H. Beijnen and Jan H.M. Schellens, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Caroline M P W Mandigers
- Maarten J. Deenen, Didier Meulendijks, Annemieke Cats, Marjolein K. Sechterberger, Henk Boot, Hilde Rosing, Jos H. Beijnen, and Jan H.M. Schellens, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Paul H. Smits and Marcel Soesan, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam; Johan L. Severens, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Caroline M.P.W. Mandigers, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen; and Jos H. Beijnen and Jan H.M. Schellens, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel Soesan
- Maarten J. Deenen, Didier Meulendijks, Annemieke Cats, Marjolein K. Sechterberger, Henk Boot, Hilde Rosing, Jos H. Beijnen, and Jan H.M. Schellens, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Paul H. Smits and Marcel Soesan, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam; Johan L. Severens, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Caroline M.P.W. Mandigers, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen; and Jos H. Beijnen and Jan H.M. Schellens, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jos H Beijnen
- Maarten J. Deenen, Didier Meulendijks, Annemieke Cats, Marjolein K. Sechterberger, Henk Boot, Hilde Rosing, Jos H. Beijnen, and Jan H.M. Schellens, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Paul H. Smits and Marcel Soesan, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam; Johan L. Severens, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Caroline M.P.W. Mandigers, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen; and Jos H. Beijnen and Jan H.M. Schellens, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jan H M Schellens
- Maarten J. Deenen, Didier Meulendijks, Annemieke Cats, Marjolein K. Sechterberger, Henk Boot, Hilde Rosing, Jos H. Beijnen, and Jan H.M. Schellens, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Paul H. Smits and Marcel Soesan, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam; Johan L. Severens, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Caroline M.P.W. Mandigers, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen; and Jos H. Beijnen and Jan H.M. Schellens, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ignatyeva VI, Severens JL, Ramos IC, Galstyan GR, Avxentyeva MV. Costs of Hospital Stay in Specialized Diabetic Foot Department in Russia. Value Health Reg Issues 2015; 7:80-86. [PMID: 29698156 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2015.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2014] [Revised: 09/10/2015] [Accepted: 09/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is considered to be one of the most common and costly diabetic complications. The approach unanimously recommended for patients with DFU is treatment by a multidisciplinary foot care team, which in Russia mainly is limited to few federal and regional hospitals. Currently, financing schemes for medical institutions are changing, thus raising the issue of setting adequate tariffs. OBJECTIVE To identify the cost of treatment in the specialized diabetic foot department and determinants of variation in cost among individual patients with DFU in the Russian setting from the perspective of a health care organization. METHODS We collected data on treatment cost per admission to the Diabetic Foot Department of the Endocrinology Scientific Center and information on patients' characteristics derived from medical records. Data on costs were analyzed, and descriptive statistics are reported. A standard multiple regression analysis was performed to identify the main drivers of treatment cost for patients with DFU. RESULTS The mean treatment cost was €3051. The mean cost of treatment for patients with DFU was significantly higher than that for diabetic patients without this complication. The most relevant predictors of the costs of treatment for patients with DFU were surgery provided and length of stay in hospital. CONCLUSIONS The cost for treatment of DFU by a multidisciplinary team in the federal medical institution was substantially higher than basic medical insurance tariff for this disease. Because revascularization procedures appeared to be the main cost driver, our results stress the need for careful implementation of this type of treatment for patients with DFU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria I Ignatyeva
- The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia; Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Johan L Severens
- Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isaac Corro Ramos
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maria V Avxentyeva
- The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Tran-Duy A, Boonen A, van de Laar MAFJ, Severens JL. Impact on total population health and societal cost, and the implication on the actual cost-effectiveness of including tumour necrosis factor-α antagonists in management of ankylosing spondylitis: a dynamic population modelling study. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2015; 13:18. [PMID: 26451133 PMCID: PMC4597433 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-015-0044-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2014] [Accepted: 09/29/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Sequential treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) that includes tumour necrosis factor-α antagonists (anti-TNF agents) has been applied in most of the Western countries. Existing cost-effectiveness (CE) models almost exclusively presented the incremental CE of anti-TNF agents using a closed cohort while budget impact studies are mainly lacking. Notwithstanding, information on impact on total population health and societal budget as well as on actual incremental CE for a given decision time span are important for decision makers. This study aimed at quantifying, for different decision time spans starting from January 1, 2014 in the Dutch society, (1) impact of sequential drug treatment strategies without and with inclusion of anti-TNF agents (Strategies 1 and 2, respectively) on total population health and societal cost, and (2) the actual incremental CE of Strategy 2 compared to Strategy 1. Methods Dynamic population modelling was used to capture total population health and cost, and the actual incremental CE. Distinguishing the prevalent AS population on January 1, 2014 and the incident AS cohorts in the subsequent 20 years, the model tracked individually an actual number of AS patients until death or end of the simulation time. During the simulation, data on patient characteristics, history of drug use, costs and health at discrete time points were generated. In Strategy 1, five nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were available but anti-TNF agents withdrawn. In Strategy 2, five NSAIDs and two anti-TNF agents continued to be available. Results The predicted size of the prevalent AS population in the Dutch society varied within the range of 67,145–69,957 with 44–46 % of the patients receiving anti-TNF agents over the period 2014–2034. The use of anti-TNF agents resulted in an increase in the annual drug costs (168.54–205.28 million Euros), but at the same time caused a decrease in the annual productivity costs (12.58–31.21 million Euros) and in annual costs of healthcare categories other than drugs (7.23–11.90 million Euros). Incremental cost (Euros) per QALY gained in Strategy 2 compared to Strategy 1 corresponding to decision time spans of 5, 10, 15 and 20 years improved slightly from 75,379 to 67,268, 63,938 and 61,129, respectively. At willingness-to-pay thresholds of 118,656, 112,067, 110,188 and 110,512 Euros, it was 99 % certain that Strategy 2 was cost-effective for decision time spans of 5, 10, 15 and 20, respectively. Conclusions Using the dynamic population approach, the present model can project real-time data to inform a healthcare system decision that affects all actual number of AS patients eligible for anti-TNF agents within different decision time spans. The predicted total population costs of different categories in the present study can help plan the organization of the healthcare resources based on the national budget for the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- An Tran-Duy
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands ; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands ; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands ; Caphri School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mart A F J van de Laar
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Twente University and Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Johan L Severens
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Mandrik O, Corro Ramos I, Knies S, Al M, Severens JL. Cost-effectiveness of adding rituximab to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Ukraine. Cancer Manag Res 2015; 7:279-89. [PMID: 26345331 PMCID: PMC4555968 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s79258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness, from a health care perspective, of adding rituximab to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide scheme (FCR versus FC) for treatment-naïve and refractory/relapsed Ukrainian patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. A decision-analytic Markov cohort model with three health states and 1-month cycle time was developed and run within a life time horizon. Data from two multinational, prospective, open-label Phase 3 studies were used to assess patients’ survival. While utilities were generalized from UK data, local resource utilization and disease-associated treatment, hospitalization, and side effect costs were applied. The alternative scenario was performed to assess the impact of lower life expectancy of the general population in Ukraine on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for treatment-naïve patients. One-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. The ICER (in US dollars) of treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients with FCR versus FC is US$8,704 per quality-adjusted life year gained for treatment-naïve patients and US$11,056 for refractory/relapsed patients. When survival data were modified to the lower life expectancy of the general population in Ukraine, the ICER for treatment-naïve patients was higher than US$13,000. This value is higher than three times the current gross domestic product per capita in Ukraine. Sensitivity analyses have shown a high impact of rituximab costs and a moderate impact of differences in utilities on the ICER. Furthermore, probabilistic sensitivity analyses have shown that for refractory/relapsed patients the probability of FCR being cost-effective is higher than for treatment-naïve patients and is close to one if the threshold is higher than US$15,000. State coverage of rituximab treatment may be considered a cost-effective treatment for the Ukrainian population under conditions of economic stability, cost-effectiveness threshold growth, or rituximab price negotiations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olena Mandrik
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Isaac Corro Ramos
- Institute of Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Saskia Knies
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands ; National Health Care Institute, Diemen, the Netherlands
| | - Maiwenn Al
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands ; Institute of Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johan L Severens
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands ; Institute of Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Vaidya A, Joore MA, ten Cate-Hoek AJ, ten Cate H, Severens JL. Cost-effectiveness of risk assessment and tailored treatment for peripheral arterial disease patients. Biomark Med 2015; 8:989-99. [PMID: 25343671 DOI: 10.2217/bmm.14.45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM The objective of this study was to explore the cost-effectiveness of D-dimer biomarker and the societal value (headroom) of a hypothetical perfect biomarker for risk assessment and subsequent treatment stratification of prophylactic treatment for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). PATIENTS & METHODS Decision analytic modeling. RESULTS Use of the D-dimer biomarker to prescribe oral anticoagulants in the high-risk subset of patients is a cost-effective healthcare intervention. The headroom (societal willingness to pay multiplied by incremental quality-adjusted life years) available for the hypothetical perfect biomarker amounted to €83,877. CONCLUSION D-dimer-based PAD risk assessment and treatment tailoring is cost effective. Identification of high-risk PAD patients and prescription of oral anticoagulants could potentially save substantial costs and improve chances of survival for high-risk PAD patients. However, further research of risk stratifying biomarkers test accuracy is needed to support and strengthen the results of this modeling study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anil Vaidya
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND An economic value calculation was performed to estimate the lifetime net present value of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan. METHODS Net lifetime tax revenues were used to represent governmental benefits accruing from a hypothetical cohort of an IVF population born in 2009 using the methodology of generational accounting. Governmental expenses related to this population included social benefits, education and health care, unemployment support, and pensions. Where available, country-specific data referencing official sources were applied. RESULTS The average health care cost needed to achieve one additional birth from the governmental perspective varied from $2,599 in Ukraine to $5,509 in Belarus. The net present value from the population born using IVF was positive in all countries: for Ukraine ($9,839), Belarus ($21,702), and Kazakhstan ($2,295). The break-even costs of drugs and supplies per IVF procedure is expected to be $3,870, $8,530, and $1,780, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses based on 5,000 simulations show that the average net present value per person remains positive: $1,894±$7,619, $27,925±$12,407, and $17,229±$24,637 in Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan, respectively. CONCLUSION Financing IVF may represent a good investment in terms of governmental financial returns, even in lower-income countries with state-financed health care systems such as Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olena Mandrik
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Saskia Knies
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- National Health Care Institute, Diemen, the Netherlands
| | - Johan L Severens
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- iMTA Institute of Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
van Haaren-ten Haken TM, Hendrix M, Smits LJ, Nieuwenhuijze MJ, Severens JL, de Vries RG, Nijhuis JG. The influence of preferred place of birth on the course of pregnancy and labor among healthy nulliparous women: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15:33. [PMID: 25884308 PMCID: PMC4342224 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-015-0455-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2014] [Accepted: 01/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Most studies on birth settings investigate the association between planned place of birth at the start of labor and birth outcomes and intervention rates. To optimize maternity care it also is important to pay attention to the entire process of pregnancy and childbirth. This study explores the association between the initial preferred place of birth and model of care, and the course of pregnancy and labor in low-risk nulliparous women in the Netherlands. Methods As part of a Dutch prospective cohort study (2007–2011), we compared medical indications during pregnancy and birth outcomes of 576 women who initially preferred a home birth (n = 226), a midwife-led hospital birth (n = 168) or an obstetrician-led hospital birth (n = 182). Data were obtained by a questionnaire before 20 weeks of gestation and by medical records. Analyses were performed according to the initial preferred place of birth. Results Low-risk nulliparous women who preferred a home birth with midwife-led care were less likely to be diagnosed with a medical indication during pregnancy compared to women who preferred a birth with obstetrician-led care (OR 0.41 95% CI 0.25-0.66). Preferring a birth with midwife-led care – both at home and in hospital - was associated with lower odds of induced labor (OR 0.51 95% CI 0.28-0.95 respectively OR 0.42 95% CI 0.21-0.85) and epidural analgesia (OR 0.32 95% CI 0.18-0.56 respectively OR 0.34 95% CI 0.19-0.62) compared to preferring a birth with obstetrician-led care. In addition, women who preferred a home birth were less likely to experience augmentation of labor (OR 0.54 95% CI 0.32-0.93) and narcotic analgesia (OR 0.41 95% CI 0.21-0.79) compared to women who preferred a birth with obstetrician-led care. We observed no significant association between preferred place of birth and mode of birth. Conclusions Nulliparous women who initially preferred a home birth were less likely to be diagnosed with a medical indication during pregnancy. Women who initially preferred a birth with midwife-led care – both at home and in hospital – experienced lower rates of interventions during labor. Although some differences can be attributed to the model of care, we suggest that characteristics and attitudes of women themselves also play an important role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamar M van Haaren-ten Haken
- Research Centre for Midwifery Science Maastricht, Zuyd University, PO Box 1256, 6201 BG, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Marijke Hendrix
- Research Centre for Midwifery Science Maastricht, Zuyd University, PO Box 1256, 6201 BG, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Luc J Smits
- Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Marianne J Nieuwenhuijze
- Research Centre for Midwifery Science Maastricht, Zuyd University, PO Box 1256, 6201 BG, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Johan L Severens
- Erasmus University Rotterdam, Institute of Health Policy and Management, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Raymond G de Vries
- Research Centre for Midwifery Science Maastricht, Zuyd University, PO Box 1256, 6201 BG, Maastricht, The Netherlands. .,Maastricht University Medical Centre, CAPRHI School for Public Health and Primary Care, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Jan G Nijhuis
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology/GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Frederix GWJ, Hövels AM, Severens JL, Raaijmakers JAM, Schellens JHM. [Threshold value for reimbursement of costs of new drugs: cost-effectiveness research and modelling are essential links]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2015; 159:A7728. [PMID: 26083839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
There is increasing discussion in the Netherlands about the introduction of a threshold value for the costs per extra year of life when reimbursing costs of new drugs. The Medicines Committee ('Commissie Geneesmiddelen'), a division of the Netherlands National Healthcare Institute ('Zorginstituut Nederland'), advises on reimbursement of costs of new drugs. This advice is based upon the determination of therapeutic value of the drug and the results of economic evaluations. Mathematical models that predict future costs and effectiveness are often used in economic evaluations; these models can vary greatly in transparency and quality due to author assumptions. Standardisation of cost-effectiveness models is one solution to overcome the unwanted variation in quality. Discussions about the introduction of a threshold value can only be meaningful if all involved are adequately informed, and by high quality in cost-effectiveness research and, particularly, economic evaluations. Collaboration and discussion between medical specialists, patients or patient organisations, health economists and policy makers, both in development of methods and in standardisation, are essential to improve the quality of decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geert W J Frederix
- Universiteit Utrecht, departement Farmaceutische Wetenschappen, disciplinegroep Farmaco-epidemiologie en Farmacotherapie, Utrecht
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Economic evaluations can inform decisions about the efficiency and allocation of resources to implementation strategies—strategies explicitly designed to inform care providers and patients about the best available research evidence and to enhance its use in their practices. These strategies are increasingly popular in health care, especially in light of growing concerns about quality of care and limits on resources. But such concerns have hardly motivated health authorities and other decision-makers to spend on some form of economic evaluation in their assessments of implementation strategies. This editorial addresses the importance of economic evaluation in the context of implementation science—particularly, how these analyses can be most efficiently incorporated into decision-making processes about implementation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ties Hoomans
- Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. .,Section of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
| | - Johan L Severens
- Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. .,Institute of Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Knies S, Boonen A, Severens JL. Do the Washington Panel recommendations hold for Europe: investigating the relation between quality of life versus work-status, absenteeism and presenteeism. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2014; 12:24. [PMID: 25904824 PMCID: PMC4405823 DOI: 10.1186/1478-7547-12-24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2014] [Accepted: 11/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The question of how to value lost productivity in economic evaluations has been subject of debate in the past twenty years. According to the Washington panel, lost productivity influences health-related quality of life and should thus be considered a health effect instead of a cost to avoid double counting. Current empirical evidence on the inclusion of income loss when valuing health states is not decisive. We examined the relationship between three aspects of lost productivity (work-status, absenteeism and presenteeism) and patient or social valuation of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS Cross-sectional survey data were collected from a total of 830 respondents with a rheumatic disorder from four West-European countries. Health-related quality of life was expressed in either the European societal utility using EQ-5D-3L or the patient valuation using EQ-VAS. The impact of work-status (four categories), absenteeism (absent from paid work during the past three months), and presenteeism (QQ method) on EQ-5D utilities and VAS scores was examined in linear regression analyses taking into account demographic characteristics and disease severity (duration, pain and restriction). RESULTS The relationship between work-status, absenteeism or presenteeism and HRQoL was stronger for patient valuation than societal valuation. Compared to work-status and presenteeism the relationship between absenteeism and HRQoL was even less explicit. However, results for all measures of lost productivity are only marginally significant and negligible compared to the influence of disease-related restrictions. CONCLUSIONS This survey study in patients with a rheumatic disorder in four European countries, does not fully support the Washington panel's claim that lost productivity is a significantly related with HRQoL, and this is even more apparent for absenteeism than for work-status and presenteeism. For West-European countries, there is no reason, to include absenteeism in the QALY. Findings need to be confirmed in other disease areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saskia Knies
- Department of Health Services Research, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands ; National Health Care Institute, PO Box 320, 1110 AH Diemen, the Netherlands ; Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Johan L Severens
- Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands ; Institute of Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Frederix GWJ, Severens JL, Hövels AM, van Hasselt JGC, Hooiveld MJJ, Neven P, Raaijmakers JAM, Schellens JHM. Real world cost of human epidermal receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients: a longitudinal incidence-based observational costing study in the Netherlands and Belgium. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2014; 24:340-54. [PMID: 25413216 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/23/2014] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Currently, no country-specific metastatic breast cancer (MBC) observational costing data are available for the Netherlands and Belgium. Our aim is to describe country-specific resource use and costs of human epidermal receptor 2 (HER-2)-positive MBC in the Netherlands and Belgium, making use of real-world data. The eligibility period for patient selection was from April 2004 to April 2010. Inclusion and retrospective data collection begins at the time of first diagnosis of HER-2-positive MBC during the eligibility period and ends 24 months post-index diagnosis of MBC or at patient death. We identified 88 eligible patients in the Netherlands and 44 patients in Belgium. The total costs of medical treatment and other resource use utilisation per patient was €48,301 in the Netherlands and €37,431 in Belgium. Majority of costs was related to the use of trastuzumab in both countries, which was 50% of the total costs in the Netherlands and 56% in Belgium respectively. Our study provides estimates of resource use and costs for HER-2-positive MBC in the Netherlands and Belgium. We noticed various differences in resource use patterns between both countries demonstrating caution is needed when transferring cost estimates between countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G W J Frederix
- Science Faculty, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mandrik O, Knies S, Kaló Z, Severens JL. Transferability of Economic Evaluations To Central and Eastern Euroepan and Former Soviet Countries. Value Health 2014; 17:A443-A444. [PMID: 27201196 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- O Mandrik
- Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Kiev, Ukraine
| | - S Knies
- Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Z Kaló
- Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE), Budapest, Hungary
| | - J L Severens
- Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|