1
|
Natale G, Leonardi B, Messina G, Bergameo G, Di Filippo V, Chisari G, Raciti G, Lombardo SP, Mirra R, Capasso F, Leone F, Pica DG, Fiorelli A. Three-dimensional lung reconstructions for the localization of lung nodules to be resected during surgery. Thorac Cancer 2023; 14:3389-3396. [PMID: 37860943 PMCID: PMC10693940 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.15131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The localization of lung nodules is challenging during thoracoscopy. In this study, we evaluated the use of three-dimensional (3D) lung reconstruction for use in the operating room to guide the identification of lung nodules during thoracoscopy. METHODS This was a single-center retrospective study. All consecutive patients undergoing thoracoscopic resection of lung nodules were included in the study. Patients were retrospectively divided into two groups based upon whether the thoracoscopic resection was performed with the assistance (3D group) or not (standard group) of 3D lung reconstruction. The operative time (minutes) to detect lung nodules was statistically compared between the two study groups in relation to the characteristics of lung nodules as size, localization, and distance from the visceral pleura. RESULTS Our study population consisted of 170 patients: 85 in the 3D group and 85 in the standard group. No intergroup difference differences were found regarding the characteristics and histological diagnosis of lesions. The standard group compared to the 3D group was associated with a significantly longer operative time for the detection of lesions <10 mm (13.87 ± 2.59 vs. 5.52 ± 1.01, p < 0.001), lesions between 10 and 20 mm (5.05 ± 0.84 vs. 3.89 ± 0.92; p = 0.03), lesions localized in complex segments (7.49 ± 4.25 vs. 5.11 ± 0.97; p < 0.001), and deep lesions (9.58 ± 4.82 vs. 5.4 ± 1.01, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our 3D lung reconstruction model for use in the operating room may be an additional tool for thoracic surgeons to guide the detection of small and deep nodules during thoracoscopy. It is a noninvasive and cost saving procedure and may be widely used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Natale
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Translation MedicineUniversità della Campania “LuigiVanvitelli”NaplesItaly
| | - Beatrice Leonardi
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Translation MedicineUniversità della Campania “LuigiVanvitelli”NaplesItaly
| | - Gaetana Messina
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Translation MedicineUniversità della Campania “LuigiVanvitelli”NaplesItaly
| | - Grazia Bergameo
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Translation MedicineUniversità della Campania “LuigiVanvitelli”NaplesItaly
| | - Vincenzo Di Filippo
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Translation MedicineUniversità della Campania “LuigiVanvitelli”NaplesItaly
| | - Giulia Chisari
- Genomics and Experimental Oncology Unit, IOM RicercaViagrandeItaly
| | - Gabriele Raciti
- Genomics and Experimental Oncology Unit, IOM RicercaViagrandeItaly
| | | | - Rosa Mirra
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Translation MedicineUniversità della Campania “LuigiVanvitelli”NaplesItaly
| | - Francesca Capasso
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Translation MedicineUniversità della Campania “LuigiVanvitelli”NaplesItaly
| | - Francesco Leone
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Translation MedicineUniversità della Campania “LuigiVanvitelli”NaplesItaly
| | - Davide Gerardo Pica
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Translation MedicineUniversità della Campania “LuigiVanvitelli”NaplesItaly
| | - Alfonso Fiorelli
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Translation MedicineUniversità della Campania “LuigiVanvitelli”NaplesItaly
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Walji HD, Ellis SA, Martin-Ucar AE, Hernandez L. Simulation in thoracic surgery-A mini review of a vital educational tool to maximize peri-operative care and minimize complications. Front Surg 2023; 10:1146716. [PMID: 37206340 PMCID: PMC10189136 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1146716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Thoracic surgery is an increasingly expanding field, and the addition of national screening programs has resulted in increasing operative numbers and complexity. Thoracic surgery overall has an approximately 2% mortality and 20% morbidity with common specific complications including persistent air leak, pneumothorax, and fistulas. The nature of the surgery results in complications being unique to thoracic surgery and often very junior members of the surgical team feel underprepared to deal with these complications after very little exposure during their medical school and general surgical rotations. Throughout medicine, simulation is being increasingly used as a method to teach the management of complicated, rare, or significant risk occurrences and has shown significant benefits in learner confidence and outcomes. In this mini review we explain the learning theory and benefits of simulation learning. We also discuss the current state of simulation in thoracic surgery and its potential future in aiding complication management and patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasanali David Walji
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, United Kingdom
- Department of Medical Education, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Steven Aaron Ellis
- Department of Medical Education, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Antonio Eduardo Martin-Ucar
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Luis Hernandez
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, United Kingdom
- Correspondence: Luis Hernandez
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Erwin PA, Lee AC, Ahmad U, Antonoff M, Arndt A, Backhus L, Berry M, Birdas T, Cassivi SD, Chang AC, Cooke DT, Crabtree T, DeCamp M, Donington J, Fernandez F, Force S, Gaissert H, Hofstetter W, Huang J, Kent M, Kim AW, Lin J, Martin LW, Meyerson S, Mitchell JD, Molena D, Odell D, Onaitis M, Puri V, Putnam JB, Reddy R, Schipper P, Seder CW, Shrager J, Tong B, Veeramachaneni N, Watson T, Whyte R, Ferguson MK. Consensus for Thoracoscopic Lower Lobectomy: Essential Components and Targets for Simulation. Ann Thorac Surg 2022; 114:1895-1901. [PMID: 34688617 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.09.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite demonstration of its clear benefits relative to open approaches, a video-assisted thoracic surgery technique for pulmonary lobectomy has not been universally adopted. This study aims to overcome potential barriers by establishing the essential components of the operation and determining which steps are most useful for simulation training. METHODS After randomly selecting experienced thoracic surgeons to participate, an initial list of components to a lower lobectomy was distributed. Feedback was provided by the participants, and modifications were made based on anonymous responses in a Delphi process. Components were declared essential once at least 80% of participants came to an agreement. The steps were then rated based on cognitive and technical difficulty followed by listing the components most appropriate for simulation. RESULTS After 3 rounds of voting 18 components were identified as essential to performance of a video-assisted thoracic surgery for lower lobectomy. The components deemed the most difficult were isolation and division of the basilar and superior segmental branches of the pulmonary artery, isolation and division of the lower lobe bronchus, and dissection of lymphovascular tissue to expose the target bronchus. The steps determined to be most amenable for simulation were isolation and division of the branches of the pulmonary artery, the lower lobe bronchus, and the inferior pulmonary vein. CONCLUSIONS Using a Delphi process a list of essential components for a video-assisted thoracic surgery for lower lobectomy was established. Furthermore 3 components were identified as most appropriate for simulation-based training, providing insights for future simulation development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip A Erwin
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Andy C Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Usman Ahmad
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Mara Antonoff
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas
| | - Andrew Arndt
- Department of Surgery Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Leah Backhus
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Mark Berry
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Thomas Birdas
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - Andrew C Chang
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - David T Cooke
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, California
| | - Traves Crabtree
- Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois
| | - Malcolm DeCamp
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | | | - Seth Force
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Henning Gaissert
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Wayne Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas
| | - James Huang
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York
| | - Michael Kent
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anthony W Kim
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jules Lin
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Linda W Martin
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Shari Meyerson
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - John D Mitchell
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Aurora, Colorado
| | - Daniela Molena
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York
| | - David Odell
- Department of Surgery Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mark Onaitis
- Department of Surgery, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Varun Puri
- Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Joe B Putnam
- Department of Surgery, Baptist MD Anderson Cancer Center, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Rishindra Reddy
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Paul Schipper
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - Joseph Shrager
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Betty Tong
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Thomas Watson
- Department of Surgery, Beaumont Health-Detroit, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Richard Whyte
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mark K Ferguson
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hussein N, Van den Eynde J, Callahan C, Guariento A, Gollmann-Tepeköylü C, Elbatarny M, Loubani M. The use of objective assessments in the evaluation of technical skills in cardiothoracic surgery: a systematic review. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2022; 35:6651070. [PMID: 35900153 PMCID: PMC9403301 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivac194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES With reductions in training time and intraoperative exposure, there is a need for objective assessments to measure trainee progression. This systematic review focuses on the evaluation of trainee technical skill performance using objective assessments in cardiothoracic surgery and its incorporation into training curricula. METHODS Databases (EBSCOHOST, Scopus and Web of Science) and reference lists of relevant articles for studies that incorporated objective assessment of technical skills of trainees/residents in cardiothoracic surgery were included. Data extraction included task performed; assessment setting and tool used; number/level of assessors; study outcome and whether the assessments were incorporated into training curricula. The methodological rigour of the studies was scored using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). RESULTS Fifty-four studies were included for quantitative synthesis. Six were randomized-controlled trials. Cardiac surgery was the most common speciality utilizing objective assessment methods with coronary anastomosis the most frequently tested task. Likert-based assessment tools were most commonly used (61%). Eighty-five per cent of studies were simulation-based with the rest being intraoperative. Expert surgeons were primarily used for objective assessments (78%) with 46% using blinding. Thirty (56%) studies explored objective changes in technical performance with 97% demonstrating improvement. The other studies were primarily validating assessment tools. Thirty-nine per cent of studies had established these assessment tools into training curricula. The mean ± standard deviation MERSQI score for all studies was 13.6 ± 1.5 demonstrating high validity. CONCLUSIONS Despite validated technical skill assessment tools being available and demonstrating trainee improvement, their regular adoption into training curricula is lacking. There is a need to incorporate these assessments to increase the efficiency and transparency of training programmes for cardiothoracic surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabil Hussein
- Hull-York-Medical-School, University of York, York, UK.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK
| | | | - Connor Callahan
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Alvise Guariento
- Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Malak Elbatarny
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mahmoud Loubani
- Hull-York-Medical-School, University of York, York, UK.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|