Outcomes after early or late timing of surgery for infective endocarditis with ischaemic stroke: a retrospective cohort study

Early Valve Surgery for Endocarditis After Acute Embolic Stroke

BACKGROUND

Patients with active endocarditis often suffer acute stroke, with increased risk for hemorrhagic conversion at the time of valve repair or replacement. Controversy persists about timing of operative intervention.

METHODS

An institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database of all patients with endocarditis was reviewed for patients undergoing valve surgery (2016-2024). Electronic medical records were reviewed for detailed stroke information and longitudinal follow-up. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival curves evaluated outcomes and survival.

RESULTS

Operations for acute active infective endocarditis were performed in 656 patients. Preoperative stroke occurred in 98 patients (14.9%); 86 strokes (87.8%) were embolic, and 16 patients (18.6%) had microhemorrhagic and 12 (12.2%) had hemorrhagic strokes. Median time between preoperative stroke diagnosis and surgery was 5.5 days. The overall incidence of postoperative stroke was 2.1% (14 of 656), with no statistically significant difference in postoperative stroke between patients with vs without preoperative stroke (n = 4 of 98 [4.1%] vs n = 10 of 558 [1.8%]; P = .148). However, the proportion of patients with postoperative hemorrhagic strokes was higher in the preoperative stroke group (3.1% vs 0.5%, P = .016). Finally, of patients with preoperative stroke, early surgery ≤72 hours (n= 38 [38.8%]) was not associated with increased stroke (2.6% vs 5.0%, P = .564).

CONCLUSIONS

These contemporary data highlight the feasibility of an early valve surgery strategy for acute endocarditis in the setting of acute stroke, with noninferior postoperative stroke risk.

Comparing clinical outcomes of ARB and ACEi in patients hospitalized for acute COVID-19

Continued receipt of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone inhibitors in patients with COVID-19 has shown potential in producing better clinical outcomes. However, superiority between ACEi (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) and ARB (angiotensin II receptor blockers) regarding clinical outcomes in this setting remains unknown. We retrospectively collected data on patients hospitalized for acute COVID-19 using the nationwide administrative database (Diagnosis and Procedure Combinations, DPC). The DPC data covered around 25% of all acute care hospitals in Japan. Patient outcomes, with focus on inpatient mortality, were compared between patients previously prescribed ACEi and those prescribed ARB. Comparisons based on crude, multivariate and propensity-score adjusted analysis were conducted. We examined a total of 7613 patients (ARB group, 6903; ACEi group 710). The ARB group showed lower crude in-hospital mortality, compared to the ACEi group (5% vs 8%; odds ratio, 0.65; 95% CI 0.48-0.87), however not in the multivariate-adjusted model (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% CI 0.69-1.3) or propensity-score adjusted models (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI 0.63-1.2). ARB shows potential in reducing hospital stay duration over ACEi in patients admitted for COVID-19, but does not significantly reduce in-hospital mortality. Further prospective studies are needed to draw a definitive conclusion, but continuation of either of these medications is warranted to improve clinical outcomes.

Adding Fuel to the Fire: Infective Endocarditis and the Challenge of Cerebrovascular Complications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Infective endocarditis is a deadly disease and made more deadly by neurologic complications. We review the cerebrovascular complications of infective endocarditis and focus our discussion on medical and surgical management.

RECENT FINDINGS

While management of stroke in the setting of infective endocarditis differs from standard stroke treatment, mechanical thrombectomy has proven safe and successful. Optimal timing of cardiac surgery in the setting of stroke remains an area of debate, but additional observational studies continue to add more detail to the discussion. Cerebrovascular complications in the setting of infective endocarditis remain a high stakes clinical challenge. Timing of cardiac surgery in IE complicated by stroke exemplifies these dilemmas. While more studies have suggested that earlier cardiac surgery is likely safe for those with small ischemic infarcts, there remains a need for more data defining optimal timing of surgery in all forms of cerebrovascular involvement.

Does Quality of Life in Survivors of Surgery for Acute Left-Sided Infective Endocarditis Differ from Non-Endocarditis Patients?

Surgery for left-sided infective endocarditis (IE) has been demonstrated to improve patients' survival rates but information about quality of life (QoL) after surgery is scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the postoperative outcomes and QoL after surgery for IE patients compared to patients undergoing cardiac surgery for non-IE indications. Adult patients with definite acute left-sided IE were matched 1:1 to patients who underwent cardiac surgery for non-endocarditic purposes from 2014 to 2019. QoL was assessed using the SF-36 survey at the last follow-up. A total of 105 patients were matched. The IE group had higher rates of preoperative stroke (21% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.005) and higher stages of NYHA class (p < 0.001), EuroSCORE II (12.3 vs. 3.0, p < 0.001) and blood cell count abnormalities (p < 0.001). The IE group had higher incidence of low cardiac output syndrome (13.3% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.029), dialysis (10.5% vs 1.0%, p = 0.007) and prolonged mechanical ventilation (16.2% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.002) after surgery. At the last follow-up, subcomponents of the SF-36 QoL survey were not different between the groups. Patients who underwent cardiac surgery for IE demonstrated a higher risk profile with a higher rate of postoperative complications. Once recovered from the acute phase of the disease, the reported QoL at follow-up was comparable to that of matched cardiac patients operated for non-IE purposes.

Optimal Timing for Cardiac Surgery in Infective Endocarditis with Neurological Complications: A Narrative Review

In patients with infective endocarditis and neurological complications, the optimal timing for cardiac surgery is unclear due to the varied risk of clinical deterioration when early surgery is performed. The aim of this review is to summarize the best evidence on the optimal timing for cardiac surgery in the presence of each type of neurological complication. An English literature search was carried out from June 2018 through July 2022. The resulting selection, comprising observational studies, clinical trials, systematic reviews and society guidelines, was organized into four sections according to the four groups of neurological complications: ischemic, hemorrhagic, infectious, and asymptomatic complications. Cardiac surgery could be performed without delay in cases of ischemic vascular neurological complication (provided the absence of severe damage, which can be avoided with the performance of mechanical thrombectomy in cases of major stroke), as well as infectious or asymptomatic complications. In the presence of intracranial hemorrhage, a delay of four weeks is recommended for most cases, although recent studies have suggested that performing cardiac surgery within four weeks could be a suitable option for selected cases. The findings of this review are mostly in line with the recommendations of the current European and American infective endocarditis guidelines.

Preoperative stroke before cardiac surgery does not increase risk of postoperative stroke

The optimal time when surgery can be safely performed after stroke is unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate how cardiac surgery timing after stroke impacts postoperative outcomes between 2011–2017 were reviewed. Variables were extracted from the institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database, statewide patient registry, and medical records. Subjects were classified based upon presence of endocarditis and further grouped by timing of preoperative stroke relative to cardiac surgery: Recent (stroke within two weeks before surgery), Intermediate (between two and six weeks before), and Remote (greater than six weeks before). Postoperative outcomes were compared amongst groups. 157 patients were included: 54 in endocarditis and 103 in non-endocarditis, with 47 in Recent, 26 in Intermediate, and 84 in Remote. 30-day mortality and postoperative stroke rate were similar across the three subgroups for both endocarditis and non-endocarditis. Of patients with postoperative stroke, mortality was 30% (95% CI 4.6–66). Timing of cardiac surgery after stroke occurrence does not seem to affect postoperative stroke or mortality. If postoperative stroke does occur, subsequent stroke-related mortality is high.

Guidelines on prosthetic heart valve management in infective endocarditis: a narrative review comparing American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and European Society of Cardiology guidelines

Infective endocarditis (IE) represented over the last year a growing medical and surgical concern. The changes in etiology and demographic of the disease, which now includes also a large proportion of iatrogenic conditions, has prompted new studies and updates in the guideline for IE treatment. The increasing use of intravascular and intracardiac devices has introduced new challenges in terms of both antibiotic resistance and surgical treatment of prosthetic endocarditis. Also, patients with complex congenital heart diseases, intravenous drug abusers and patients with chronic renal failure under hemodialysis have been added to the list of high-risk subjects for IE. Important aspects concerning the establishment of the endocarditis team, the clinical management, the optimal medical therapy and the indication and timing for surgery are arguments of debate and controversy across the literature. In particular, the most adequate strategy to be adopted in the context of concomitant neurological complication remains greatly debated. Despite attempts to standardize the practice in IE, the lack of powered randomized clinical evidence prevented the achievement of a univocal consensus in several aspects of the management of IE. This situation reflects in some differences in the recommendation promoted by the European Society of Cardiology and American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology. In this review, we will compare the European Society of Cardiology and the American Heart Association guidelines and discuss important aspects related to clinical management and indications of for treatment.

Valve surgery for infective endocarditis complicated by stroke: surgical timing and perioperative neurological complications

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Ischaemic and hemorrhagic strokes are dreaded complications of infective endocarditis (IE). The timing of valve surgery for IE patients with stroke remains uncertain. The aim was to study perioperative neurological complications in relation to surgical timing.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of patients diagnosed with acute IE from January 2010 to December 2016. Early surgery was defined as valve surgery within 14 days of IE diagnosis, and late surgery as after 14 days. Neurological complications that occurred within 14 days post-surgery were considered perioperative and classified as new ischaemic stroke or hemorrhagic stroke, expansion of an existing intracranial hemorrhage and new-onset seizures. Perioperative neurological complications were compared by surgical timing and other variables, including pre-surgical imaging.

RESULTS

Overall, 183 patients underwent valve surgery: 92 had early surgery at a median of 8 days (interquartile range 6-11); 91 had late surgery at a median of 28 days (interquartile range 19-50). Twenty patients (10.9%) had 24 complications: 11 ischaemic, six intraparenchymal hemorrhages, three subarachnoid hemorrhages (SAHs) and four new-onset seizures. Rates of neurological complications were similar for early and late surgery groups (10.9% vs. 11%). Enterococcal IE was more common amongst patients with perioperative neurological complications (35% vs. 12.3%, P < 0.01). An acute infarct was present on pre-surgical magnetic resonance imaging of 134 patients (74%) and was not associated with perioperative neurological complications. Thirty-five patients (19.3%) had intracranial hemorrhage on pre-surgical imaging. SAH on pre-surgical imaging was associated with developing SAH perioperatively (66.7% vs. 13.5%, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Early valve surgery for patients with IE complicated by stroke was not associated with perioperative neurological complications.

Early vs Late Surgery for Patients With Endocarditis and Neurological Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical timing in infective endocarditis (IE) with preoperative neurological events remains controversial. The relevant society guidelines are each on the basis of a small number of observational studies. This meta-analysis was designed to search the available literature broadly and assess the weight of available evidence as comprehensively as possible.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE to April 2018 for studies that compared mortality or neurological exacerbation in early vs late surgery for IE complicated by neurological events. Random effects meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven observational studies (25 unadjusted, n = 879; 2 adjusted, n = 451) met inclusion criteria. Using early and late thresholds defined in each study (7 or 14 days), early surgery in ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke was associated with elevated perioperative mortality vs late surgery (pooled relative risk [RR], 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-2.25; P < 0.0001; I² = 0%) and greater neurological exacerbation (RR, 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-3.32; P = 0.002; I² = 33%). In subgroup analysis, for ischemic stroke, early surgery before 7 vs before 14 days exhibited similar perioperative mortality and neurological exacerbation. For hemorrhagic stroke, performing surgery before 21 vs before 28 days showed trends toward perioperative mortality (RR, 1.77 vs 0.63, interaction P = 0.14) and neurological (RR, 2.02 vs RR, 0.44; interaction P = 0.11) exacerbation. There was no difference in long-term mortality but reporting was sparse. Early surgery was often performed for clinical deterioration, negatively biasing outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Available observational data support delaying surgery by 7-14 days if possible in IE complicated by ischemic stroke and > 21 days in hemorrhagic stroke to decrease perioperative mortality and neurological exacerbation rates. Randomized trials are needed for definitive guidance.

Surgical Management of Infective Endocarditis Complicated by Embolic Stroke: Practical Recommendations for Clinicians

There has been an overall improvement in surgical mortality for patients with infective endocarditis (IE), presumably because of improved diagnosis and management, centered around a more aggressive early surgical approach. Surgery is currently performed in approximately half of all cases of IE. Improved survival in surgery-treated patients is correlated with a reduction in heart failure and the prevention of embolic sequelae. It is reported that between 20% and 40% of patients with IE present with stroke or other neurological conditions. It is for these IE patients that the timing of surgical intervention remains a point of considerable discussion and debate. Despite evidence of improved survival in IE patients with earlier surgical treatment, a significant proportion of patients with IE and preexisting neurological complications either undergo delayed surgery or do not have surgery at all, even when surgery is indicated and guideline endorsed. Physicians and surgeons are caught in a common conundrum where the urgency of the heart operation must be balanced against the real or perceived risks of neurological exacerbation. Recent data suggest that the risk of neurological exacerbation may be lower than previously believed. Current guidelines reflect a shift toward early surgery for such patients, but there continue to be important areas of clinical equipoise. Individualized clinical assessment is of major importance for decision making, and, as such, we emphasize the need for the functioning of an endocarditis team, including cardiac surgeons, cardiologists, infectious diseases specialists, neurologists, neurosurgeons, and interventional neuroradiologists. Here, we present 2 illustrative cases, critically review contemporary data, and offer conceptual and practical suggestions for clinicians to address this important, common, and often fatal cardiac condition.

A Meta-Analysis of Early versus Delayed Surgery for Valvular Infective Endocarditis Complicated by Embolic Ischemic Stroke

Objective

An embolic ischemic stroke occurs in 10% to 40% of patients with valvular infective endocarditis (IE) and confers significant morbidity. The optimal timing of valve surgery in this population is not well defined.

Methods

With the use of PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, and Cochrane databases, a systematic review identified 14 studies through October 2015 that compared early versus delayed surgery for valvular IE complicated by an ischemic stroke. Early surgery was defined as 3 days or less in one, 7 days or less in eight, and 14 days or less in five studies. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated by the Mantel-Haenszel method under a fixed- or random-effects model, for the outcomes of perioperative stroke, operative mortality, and 1-year survival.

Results

A total of 833 patients (early surgery, 330; delayed surgery, 503) were included. The majority of operations were for aortic and/or mitral valve IE, with prosthetic valve IE present in 0% to 60%. Infection with Staphylococcus aureus ranged from 19% to 66%, and heart failure prevalence at the time of operation was 24% to 66%. Early surgery was associated with an increased risk of operative mortality (RR, 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27–2.34; P = 0.0005), which was significant regardless of surgery within the first 7 days (RR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.45–3.31; P = 0.0002) or 14 days (RR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.12–2.64; P = 0.01) after stroke. Surgical timing did not affect the risk of perioperative ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or 1-year survival.

Conclusions

In patients with valvular IE complicated by ischemic stroke, early surgery is associated with an increased risk of operative mortality, with no observed benefit in 1-year survival.