Multiple primaries in pancreatic cancer patients: indicator of a genetic predisposition?

Successful Outcome of a Patient with Concomitant Pancreatic and Renal Carcinoma Receiving Secoisolariciresinol Diglucoside Therapy Alone: A Case Report

Introduction

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is among the deadliest malignancies. Kidney cancer (KC) is a common malignancy globally. Chemo- or radio-therapies are not very effective to control PC or KC, and overdoses often cause severe site reactions to the patients. As a result, novel treatment strategies with high efficacy but without toxic side effects are urgently desired. Secoisolariciresinol diglucoside (SDG) belongs to plant lignans with potential anticancer activities, but clinical evidence is not available in PC or KC treatment.

Patient Concerns

We report a rare case of an 83-year-old female patient with pancreatic and kidney occupying lesions that lacked the conditions to receive surgery or chemo- or radiotherapy.

Diagnosis

Pancreatic and kidney cancers.

Interventions

We gave dietary SDG to the patient as the only therapeutics.

Outcomes

SDG effectively halted progression of both PC and KC. All clinical manifestations, including bad insomnia, loss of appetite, stomach symptoms, and skin itching over the whole body, all disappeared. The initial massive macroscopic hematuria became microscopic and infrequent, and other laboratory results also gradually returned to normal. Most of the cancer biomarkers, initially high such as CEA, CA199, CA724, CA125, came down rapidly, among which CA199 changed most radically. This patient has had progression-free survival of one year so far.

Conclusion

These results demonstrate the potent inhibitory effects of SDG on PC and KC of this patient and provide promising novel therapeutics for refractory malignant tumors.

Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of synchronous renal mass and pancreatic mass: a review

Objective:

Synchronous renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and pancreatic tumors are rare clinical events and have been described scarcely in the literature. Our institution has recently encountered one case. This review aims to summarize and present the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches that have been presented in the literature for these synchronous solid malignancies.

Methods:

After reviewing the literature using PubMed, 16 papers were collected that showed a total of 21 patients with a synchronous solid renal and pancreatic mass. The diagnostic and treatment data were then evaluated and analyzed.

Results:

Overall, 13 patients (59%) had two independent primary malignancies consisting of RCC and a pancreatic tumor, seven (31%) were diagnosed with primary RCC with synchronous metastasis to pancreas, one (5%) was found to have a primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma with synchronous metastasis to the kidney, and one (5%) was diagnosed with primary RCC with a benign solid pancreatic lesion. Of the 22 patients that were treated, 18 (81%) underwent surgery, one (5%) had no treatment, and three (14%) underwent chemotherapy without surgery. In the cohort of patients with surgical treatment 12 (66%) had no adjuvant therapy, one (6%) had adjuvant chemotherapy, four (22%) had adjuvant immunotherapy, and one (6%) had adjuvant radiation treatment.

Conclusions:

The occurrence of synchronous malignancies of the kidney and pancreas is rare. No clear guidelines have evolved in the literature in regard to diagnostics and treatment of these patients. This review presents recommended diagnostic and treatment guidelines for these rare clinical cases.

Level of evidence:

Not applicable for this multicenter review.

Synchronous double primary malignancies of the pancreatic body and extrahepatic bile duct treated with pancreatoduodenectomy and splenic artery resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel: a case report

BACKGROUND

Primary pancreatic cancer with synchronous primary tumors in other organs is a rare condition, and its treatment largely depends on the progression of pancreatic cancer. Here, we describe a rare case of double primary malignancies involving borderline resectable pancreatic body and extrahepatic bile duct cancers that were successfully resected after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), subsequently avoiding total pancreatectomy.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 61-year-old Japanese male was referred to our hospital by his general practitioner after presenting with elevated liver enzymes during a routine check-up for type 2 diabetes mellitus. He was diagnosed with synchronous borderline resectable pancreatic cancer in the body of the pancreas and lower extrahepatic bile duct cancer with obstructive jaundice. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) confirmed a hypovascular mass in the pancreatic body with partial encasement of the common hepatic artery, left gastric artery, celiac artery, and splenic artery and invasion of the splenic vein. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and bile duct biopsy confirmed lower bile duct cancer. Following multidisciplinary discussion, endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage was performed, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy comprising gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (GEM + nab-PTX) was administered. After a total of seven cycles of chemotherapy, follow-up CT showed that the size of the pancreatic lesion reduced, following which the patient underwent pancreatoduodenectomy with splenic artery resection. The postoperative course was uneventful without any surgical complications or intensive hypoglycemic treatment. The pathological diagnosis was pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (ypT3N1aM0 ypStage IIB/UICC 8th) with synchronous extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ypT2N1M0 ypStage IIB/UICC 8th). R0 pancreatic resection was performed with an Evans grade III response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The patient was followed up and had no tumor recurrence at 22 months after surgery with adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy, however, died after 32 months after surgery due to multiple liver metastasis and para-aortic lymph node metastasis despite salvage GEM + nab-PTX chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

In our case, neoadjuvant chemotherapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and function-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (R0 resection) for double primary malignancies achieved balanced patient survival and postoperative quality of life.

A Rare Case of Synchronous Esophageal and Pancreatic Malignancy

The incidence of double primary tumors has been rising over the past few decades. Synchronous pancreatic and esophageal carcinomas are rarely reported in the literature. In this case report, we present an 86-year-old man who developed synchronous double cancers of the pancreas and esophagus. He has a past medical history of hypertension and prior nicotine dependence and was admitted for abdominal pain and weight loss. Laboratory data on admission were normal except for the serum carbonic anhydrase 19-9 (54 U/mL, reference range: 0-34 U/mL) and carcinoembryonic antigen (712.4 ng/mL, reference range: less than <5.0 ng/mL). Abdominal ultrasonography revealed a 2.3 cm lesion at the head of the pancreas. A CT scan with contrast was highly suspicious for pancreatic head malignancy. The patient underwent endoscopical ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) that showed a large non-obstructing ulcerating mass at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) as well as a pancreatic head mass. Histological findings from the obtained tissue demonstrated pancreatic adenocarcinoma and intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the esophagus with an invasion of lamina propria, and diagnosis of double cancers of the pancreas and esophagus was made. In conclusion, our case report represents the fifth documented case of dual primary malignancy of the esophagus and pancreas. This highlights that, despite their rarity, primary distant malignancies in patients with pancreatic cancer is an entity that clinicians should be more cognizant about especially among the male smoker/ex-smoker patient population, specifically given that the current data demonstrate that the prognosis of double cancers primarily depends on the prognosis of the pancreatic carcinoma.

Clinical features of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with a history of other primary malignancies: A retrospective analysis

Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) that have a history of other primary malignancies are not well documented. The current study therefore aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with PDAC with or without a history of other primary malignancies. A total of 102 patients with surgically treated PDAC that presented with or without a history of other primary malignancies were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 25 patients (24.5%) had a history of other primary malignancies (age, with history of other primary malignancy vs. without, 74.2 vs. 68.9 years; P=0.005) and the reason for consultation (P<0.001) differed significantly between the groups with a history of other primary malignancies [HoM(+)] and without a history of other primary malignancies [HoM(-)]. Incidental indications during malignancy follow-up was the most common reason for the diagnosis of PDAC in the HoM(+) group. Conversely, there were no significant differences in the resectability (P=0.645), complete resection rate (P=0.774) and final stage (P=0.474) between the two groups. Disease-free survival was also not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.184). However, overall survival was significantly poorer in the HoM(+) group compared with the HoM(-) group (P=0.003). A history of other primary malignancies was also an independent predictor of poor overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.416; 95% confidence interval, 1.324-4.406; P=0.004). In conclusion, patients with PDAC and a history of other primary malignancies had significantly poorer overall survival than their counterparts, despite no differences in disease-free survival.

[Results of pancreatic surgery from the perspective of patients: a cross-sectional study of the support group "Arbeitskreis der Pankreatektomierten e. V."]

BACKGROUND

 The support group "Arbeitskreis der Pankreatektomierten e. V. (AdP)" was founded in 1976 and is the largest group of individuals affected by pancreatic disease in Germany. Members of the AdP support patients with pancreatic disease. This patient-initiated, cross-sectional study intends to present the results of pancreatic surgery from the perspective of patients.

METHODS

 Since March the 3 rd, 2018, members of the AdP received a questionnaire with eleven categories of questions concerning their medical history. This data was gathered in a medical database and analysed.

RESULTS

 625 members were operated upon, with 57.5 % receiving pancreaticoduodenectomy, 15.5 % distal pancreatectomy, 23.2 % total pancreatectomy, and 4.0 % another or unknown operation. 37.9 % were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, 38.2 % with another type of pancreatic tumour, 25 % with pancreatitis, 4 % with autoimmune pancreatitis and 2.7 % with other rare entities.82 patients of 237 pancreatic cancer patients survived more than 5 years. 24.5 % of the 237 patients reported have a second primary malignancy and 13.9 % have close family members with pancreatic cancer.Weight loss after pancreatic surgery was dependant on the type of operation with the greatest after pancreatectomy (17.8 ± 9.5 kg). The prevalence of diabetes was 54.1 %, the incidence of new onset perioperative diabetes 33.3 %. 91.5 % needed pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, on average 189 417 IE/day. The reported quality of life was independent from type of surgery received.

CONCLUSION

 Following complex pancreatic surgery, patients are confronted with daily lifelong challenges. AdP members offering their shared experiences offer meaningful support to newly affected patients. Individuals affected by pancreatic disease could be an important but underutilised resource to studying these diseases.

Molecular Characterization of a Long-Term Survivor Double Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Treated with Gefitinib in Combination with Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel and mFOLFOX6 as First and Second Line Therapy

The management of multiple primary cancers, an event not so infrequent in oncology practice, is a critical issue due to the lack of literature. In this study, we reported the case of a patient with non-small cell metastatic lung cancer (NSCLC) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who received gefitinib in combination with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and with mFOLFOX6 in first and second line, respectively. It achieved a progression-free survival and a28-months overall survival (OS) for NSCLC and PFS-1 and OS of 20 and 13 months, respectively for PDAC. Moreover, the combination of gefitinib and chemotherapy treatmentsshowed a good safety profile. Given the insignificant frequency of this case, we performed a molecular characterization of both neoplasms with the aim to investigate the existence of particular activated pathways and/or similar immunological mutations. It is interesting to note that two neoplasms shared a common mutation ofthe B7-H3 gene, with the consecutive impairment of its expressed protein. In both PDAC and NSCLC, the expression of this protein was associated with a worse survival rate. Since B7-H3 is an anti-apoptotic protein, the reduction of its expression or function should justify a pro-apoptotic activity with a leading justification of the long survival of the patient considered in this report.

Incidence and Mortality Rates of Second Pancreatic Cancer Among Survivors of Digestive Cancers: A Nationwide Population-Based Study

OBJECTIVES

We analyzed the incidence and mortality rates of second pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) among survivors of digestive cancers in South Korea.

METHODS

We evaluated data from the Korea National Health Insurance to identify individuals with digestive cancers in 2005 to 2015. The standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of second PDACs and survival rates were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 772,534 patients with first digestive cancers, 1696 (0.22%) developed second PDACs. The incidence of second PDACs increased until 10 years since the first cancer diagnosis. Patients with biliary tract cancers (BTCs) showed a higher incidence of second PDACs than did those with gastrointestinal cancers or hepatocellular carcinoma. In ages 20 to 49 years, SIRs (95% confidence interval) were higher in survivors of hepatocellular carcinoma (3.08; 1.04-3.08), gastric cancer (3.40; 1.90-3.40), colorectal cancer (5.00; 2.75-5.00), gallbladder cancer (58.52; 11.81-58.52), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (86.99; 1.73-86.99), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (89.41; 27.42-89.41), and ampulla of Vater cancer (156.78; 48.08-156.78). In ages 50 to 64 years, colorectal cancer (1.42; 1.04-1.42), gastric cancer (1.66; 1.29-1.66), and BTCs revealed higher SIRs. In ages more than 65 years, SIR was increased only in BTCs. Second PDACs revealed a more favorable prognosis than first PDACs.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful surveillance for second PDACs after curative treatment of BTCs and colorectal cancers should be considered.

Genetic analysis of subsequent second primary malignant neoplasms in long-term pancreatic cancer survivors suggests new potential hereditary genetic alterations

Background

The principal aim of this report was to study second primary malignant neoplasms (SMNs) in long-term survivors of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with regard to the germline genetic background.

Patients and methods

A total of 118 PDAC patients after a curative-intent surgery who were treated between 2006 and 2011 were analyzed. Of the 22 patients surviving for >5 years, six went on to develop SMNs. A genetic analysis of 219 hereditary cancer-predisposition and candidate genes was performed by targeted next-generation sequencing in germline DNA from 20 of these patients.

Results

Of all the radically resected PDAC patients, six patients went on to subsequently develop SMNs, which accounted for 27% of the long-term survivors. The median time to diagnosis of SMNs, which included two cases of rectal cancer, and one case each of prostate cancer, malignant melanoma, breast cancer, and urinary bladder cancer, was 52.5 months. At the time of analysis, none of these patients had died as a result of PDAC progression. We identified four carriers of germline pathogenic mutations in 20 analyzed long-term survivors. One carrier of the CHEK2 mutation was found among four analyzed patients who developed SMNs. Of the remaining 16 long-term PDAC survivors, 3 patients (19%) carried germline mutation(s) in the MLH1+ ATM, CHEK2, and RAD51D gene, respectively.

Conclusion

This retrospective analysis indicates that SMNs in PDAC survivors are an important clinical problem and may be more common than has been acknowledged to be the case. In patients with good performance status, surgical therapy should be considered, as the SMNs often have a favorable prognosis.

Prognosis of Pancreatic Cancer Patients with Synchronous or Metachronous Malignancies from Other Organs Is Better than Those with Pancreatic Cancer Only

PURPOSE

Pancreatic cancer associated double primary tumors are rare and their clinicopathologic characteristics are not well elucidated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinicopathologic factors of 1,352 primary pancreatic cancers with or without associated double primary tumors were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of resected primary pancreatic cancers, 113 (8.4%) had associated double primary tumors, including 26 stomach, 25 colorectal, 18 lung, and 13 thyroid cancers. The median interval between the diagnoses of pancreatic cancer and associated double primary tumors was 0.5 months. Overall survival (OS) of pancreatic cancer patients with associated double primary tumors was longer than those with pancreatic cancer only (median, 23.1 months vs. 17.0 months, p=0.002). Patients whose pancreatic cancers were resected before the diagnosis of metachronous tumors had a better OS than patients whose pancreatic cancer resected after the diagnosis of metachronous tumors (48.9 months and 13.5 months, p=0.001) or those whose pancreatic cancers were resected synchronously with non-pancreas tumors (19.1 months, p=0.043). The OS of pancreatic cancer patients with stomach (33.9 months, p=0.032) and thyroid (117.8 months, p=0.049) cancers was significantly better than those with pancreas cancer only (17.0 months).

CONCLUSION

About 8% of resected pancreatic cancers had associated double primary tumors, and those from the colorectum, stomach, lung, and thyroid were common. Patients whose pancreatic cancer was resected before the diagnosis of metachronous tumors had better OS than those resected after the diagnosis of metachronous tumors or those resected synchronously.

Synchronous primary adenocarcinoma of the lung and pancreas: a case series and review of the literature

Aim

The frequency of pancreatic cancer in association with cancer of other organs ranges from 1 to 20%, with the most common ones being gastric, colon, thyroid and genitourinary. The presence of synchronous lung and pancreatic cancers is extremely rare.

Case series

Two patients with extensive smoking history and variable presentations were found to have simultaneous lung and pancreatic masses both lesions being different histologically and on immunohistochemical staining. After individualized treatment plans, the first patient remains free of disease and the second patient is being treated with a palliative intent.

Conclusion

The early recognition and treatment is important as there exists a significant survival difference in patients who have synchronous primaries as opposed to those with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Risk of second primary malignancies in women with breast cancer: Results from the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC)

Women with a diagnosis of breast cancer are at increased risk of second primary cancers, and the identification of risk factors for the latter may have clinical implications. We have followed-up for 11 years 10,045 women with invasive breast cancer from a European cohort, and identified 492 second primary cancers, including 140 contralateral breast cancers. Expected and observed cases and Standardized Incidence Ratios (SIR) were estimated using Aalen-Johansen Markovian methods. Information on various risk factors was obtained from detailed questionnaires and anthropometric measurements. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the role of risk factors. Women with breast cancer had a 30% excess risk for second malignancies (95% confidence interval-CI 18-42) after excluding contralateral breast cancers. Risk was particularly elevated for colorectal cancer (SIR, 1.71, 95% CI 1.43-2.00), lymphoma (SIR 1.80, 95% CI 1.31-2.40), melanoma (2.12; 1.63-2.70), endometrium (2.18; 1.75-2.70) and kidney cancers (2.40; 1.57-3.52). Risk of second malignancies was positively associated with age at first cancer, body mass index and smoking status, while it was inversely associated with education, post-menopausal status and a history of full-term pregnancy. We describe in a large cohort of women with breast cancer a 30% excess of second primaries. Among risk factors for breast cancer, a history of full-term pregnancy was inversely associated with the risk of second primary cancer.

Clinical and pathologic features of familial pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Inherited predisposition to pancreatic cancer contributes significantly to its incidence and presents an opportunity for the development of early detection strategies. The genetic basis of predisposition remains unexplained in a high proportion of patients with familial PC (FPC).

METHODS

Clinicopathologic features were assessed in a cohort of 766 patients who had been diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PC). Patients were classified with FPC if they had ≥1 affected first-degree relatives; otherwise, they were classified with sporadic PC (SPC).

RESULTS

The prevalence of FPC in this cohort was 8.9%. In FPC families with an affected parent-child pair, 71% in the subsequent generation were 12.3 years younger at diagnosis. Patients with FPC had more first-degree relatives who had an extrapancreatic malignancy (EPM) (42.6% vs 21.2; P<.0001), particularly melanoma and endometrial cancer, but not a personal history of EPM. Patients with SPC were more likely to be active smokers, have higher cumulative tobacco exposure, and have fewer multifocal precursor lesions, but these were not associated with differences in survival. Long-standing diabetes mellitus (>2 years) was associated with poor survival in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

FPC represents 9% of PC, and the risk of malignancy in kindred does not appear to be confined to the pancreas. Patients with FPC have more precursor lesions and include fewer active smokers, but other clinicopathologic factors and outcome are similar to those in patients with SPC. Furthermore, some FPC kindreds may exhibit anticipation. A better understanding of the clinical features of PC will facilitate efforts to uncover novel susceptibility genes and the development of early detection strategies.

Renal tumors and second primary pancreatic tumors: a relationship with clinical impact?

Background

The occurrence of synchronous or metachronous renal cell carcinoma and pancreatic tumors has been described only in a few cases in the scientific literature. The study of double primary cancers is important because it might provide understanding of a shared genetic basis of different solid tumors and to detect patients at risk for secondary malignancy.

Methods

In a combined analysis of patient registries from University Departments of Urology and Visceral Surgery, 1178 patients with pancreatic tumors and 518 patients with renal cell carcinoma treated between 2001 and 2008 were evaluated,

Results

Overall 16 patients with renal cancer and synchronous (n = 6) or metachronous (n = 10) primary pancreatic tumors were detected. The median survival of all patients was 12.6 months, for the patients with synchronous resections 25.7 months and for the patients with metachronous resections 12.2 months, respectively.

Conclusions

The association between these two etiologies of malignancy demands more detailed epidemiological and molecular investigation. Clinical outcomes would support a resection as a recommended clinically valid option.

Improved survival of left-sided pancreas cancer after surgery

OBJECTIVE

Resective therapeutic strategy for left-sided pancreatic adenocarcinoma is open to debate. The post-resection outcomes and factors influencing post-resection survival for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas were analyzed to determine the effectiveness of surgery.

METHODS

A total of 73 patients with adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas who underwent resection between 1994 and June 2007 were evaluated for overall survival.

RESULTS

Multiple malignancies were present in 34 of 73 patients (47%). Overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates after surgery were 79%, 34%, and 30%, respectively. Presence of symptoms, multiple cancers and level of preoperative tumor marker did not influence post-resection survival. As for tumor characteristics, tumor size, histological tumor differentiation, retroperitoneal invasion, status of residual tumor and UICC staging represented significant prognostic indicators by univariate analysis. Gemcitabine, when administered as an adjuvant settings, strongly worked for improving post-resection outcome (5-year survival rate = 51%). Factors shown to have independent prognostic significance on multivariate analysis were tumor size (<3 vs. >or=3 cm), status of residual tumor (R0 vs. R1, 2), and postoperative administration of gemcitabine.

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate patient selection and accurate surgical technique with postoperative adjuvant therapy could benefit survival of patients with carcinoma of the pancreas body and tail.

Multiple primary malignancies in patients with sporadic pancreatic endocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

To investigate the appearance of multiple primary malignancies in patients with sporadic neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors (NEPTs).

METHODS

One hundred forty-five patients with NEPTs were treated at the Department of Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg. Multiple primary malignancies included tumors that were not considered to be a metastasis, invasion, or recurrence of NEPTs. Data on sex, age at diagnosis of cancer, follow-up time after diagnosis, and death rate were collected.

RESULTS

Of 115 patients with sporadic NEPTs, 15 (13.0%) patients were identified with at least one malignant tumor, other than a NEPT. The median age at diagnosis of the associated tumor(s) was 57 years (range, 10-72 years). Two of the 15 patients had insulinomas, 5 had gastrinomas and 8 had non-functioning NEPTs, respectively. The risk of developing multiple cancers was the highest for patients with gastrinoma (21.7%), followed by patients with non-functioning NFPTs (20.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with NEPTs multiple primary malignancies are found more frequently than in the general population. The etiology of the increased risk of other primaries is not clearly defined, but it may be the result of accumulated growth stimulation by the secreted hormones or a genetic alteration that leads to tumorogenesis in these patients.

Prevalence of familial pancreatic cancer in Germany

Based on several case-control studies, it has been estimated that familial aggregation and genetic susceptibility play a role in up to 10% of patients with pancreatic cancer, although conclusive epidemiologic data are still lacking. Therefore, we evaluated the prevalence of familial pancreatic cancer and differences to its sporadic form in a prospective multicenter trial. A total of 479 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were prospectively evaluated regarding medical and family history, treatment and pathology of the tumour. A family history for pancreatic cancer was confirmed whenever possible by reviewing the tumour specimens and medical reports. Statistical analysis was performed by calculating odds ratios, regression analysis with a logit-model and the Kaplan-Meier method. Twenty-three of 479 (prevalence 4.8%, 95% CI 3.1-7.1) patients reported at least 1 first-degree relative with pancreatic cancer. The familial aggregation could be confirmed by histology in 5 of 23 patients (1.1%, 95% CI 0.3-2.4), by medical records in 9 of 23 patients (1.9%, 95% CI 0.9-3.5) and by standardized interviews of first-degree relatives in 17 of 23 patients (3.5%, 95% CI 2.1-5.6), respectively. There were no statistical significant differences between familial and sporadic pancreatic cancer cases regarding sex ratio, age of onset, presence of diabetes mellitus and pancreatitis, tumour histology and stage, prognosis after palliative or curative treatment as well as associated tumours in index patients and families, respectively. The prevalence of familial pancreatic cancer in Germany is at most 3.5% (range 1.1-3.5%) depending on the mode of confirmation of the pancreatic carcinoma in relatives. This prevalence is lower than so far postulated in the literature. There were no significant clinical differences between the familial and sporadic form of pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and infiltrating adenocarcinoma: analysis of progression and recurrence by DPC4 immunohistochemical labeling

Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) is thought to be a precursor lesion of infiltrating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (IPA). DPC4 is a tumor-suppressor gene on chromosome 18q21.1 and is inactivated in approximately 55% of IPAs. Recently, immunohistochemical labeling using a monoclonal antibody to the Dpc4 protein has been shown to mirror DPC4 genetic status in invasive adenocarcinomas of the pancreas. In the present study, we examined the role of Dpc4 loss in neoplastic progression and recurrence. Two cases in which a PanIN clinically progressed to an invasive adenocarcinoma and a third of a patient with IPA of the head of the pancreas who later developed invasive adenocarcinoma in the tail of the pancreas were studied using Dpc4 immunolabeling. The first patient underwent pancreatic resection, which revealed PanIN-3 that lacked Dpc4 expression, and the patient developed an invasive pancreatic ductal carcinoma 10 years later that shared this loss of expression. The second patient had a pancreaticoduodenectomy for recurrent pancreatitis, and the resected pancreas contained PanIN-3 with intact Dpc4 expression. Seventeen months later, the patient developed an invasive adenocarcinoma of the distal pancreas that also had intact Dpc4 expression. In the third case, the patient underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for an invasive ductal adenocarcinoma with negative margins. This carcinoma lacked Dpc4 expression. Three years later, resection of the pancreatic tail showed a second invasive adenocarcinoma. The cancer in the tail of the gland showed intact Dpc4 expression, suggesting it represented a second primary tumor, not a recurrence. We conclude that Dpc4 expression in PanIN can be predictive of Dpc4 expression in the subsequent invasive ductal adenocarcinoma. Additionally, Dpc4 expression can be used to differentiate recurrent or persistent adenocarcinoma from a second primary adenocarcinoma.