Nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity of aztreonam versus aminoglycoside therapy in seriously ill nonneutropenic patients

Assessing Clinician Utilization of Next-Generation Antibiotics Against Resistant Gram-Negative Infections in U.S. Hospitals : A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The U.S. antibiotic market failure has threatened future innovation and supply. Understanding when and why clinicians underutilize recently approved gram-negative antibiotics might help prioritize the patient in future antibiotic development and potential market entry rewards.

OBJECTIVE

To determine use patterns of recently U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved gram-negative antibiotics (ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, plazomicin, eravacycline, imipenem-relebactam-cilastatin, and cefiderocol) and identify factors associated with their preferential use (over traditional generic agents) in patients with gram-negative infections due to pathogens displaying difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR; that is, resistance to all first-line antibiotics).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

619 U.S. hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult inpatients.

MEASUREMENTS

Quarterly percentage change in antibiotic use was calculated using weighted linear regression. Machine learning selected candidate variables, and mixed models identified factors associated with new (vs. traditional) antibiotic use in DTR infections.

RESULTS

Between quarter 1 of 2016 and quarter 2 of 2021, ceftolozane-tazobactam (approved 2014) and ceftazidime-avibactam (2015) predominated new antibiotic usage whereas subsequently approved gram-negative antibiotics saw relatively sluggish uptake. Among gram-negative infection hospitalizations, 0.7% (2551 [2631 episodes] of 362 142) displayed DTR pathogens. Patients were treated exclusively using traditional agents in 1091 of 2631 DTR episodes (41.5%), including "reserve" antibiotics such as polymyxins, aminoglycosides, and tigecycline in 865 of 1091 episodes (79.3%). Patients with bacteremia and chronic diseases had greater adjusted probabilities and those with do-not-resuscitate status, acute liver failure, and Acinetobacter baumannii complex and other nonpseudomonal nonfermenter pathogens had lower adjusted probabilities of receiving newer (vs. traditional) antibiotics for DTR infections, respectively. Availability of susceptibility testing for new antibiotics increased probability of usage.

LIMITATION

Residual confounding.

CONCLUSION

Despite FDA approval of 7 next-generation gram-negative antibiotics between 2014 and 2019, clinicians still frequently treat resistant gram-negative infections with older, generic antibiotics with suboptimal safety-efficacy profiles. Future antibiotics with innovative mechanisms targeting untapped pathogen niches, widely available susceptibility testing, and evidence demonstrating improved outcomes in resistant infections might enhance utilization.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

U.S. Food and Drug Administration; NIH Intramural Research Program.

Rational use of aminoglycosides--review and recommendations by the Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics (SRGA)

The Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics (SRGA) has carried out a risk-benefit analysis of aminoglycoside treatment based on clinical efficacy, antibacterial spectrum, and synergistic effect with beta-lactam antibiotics, endotoxin release, toxicity, and side effects. In addition, SRGA has considered optimal dosage schedules and advice on serum concentration monitoring, with respect to variability in volume of drug distribution and renal clearance. SRGA recommends that aminoglycoside therapy should be considered in the following situations: (1) progressive severe sepsis and septic shock, in combination with broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics, (2) sepsis without shock, in combination with broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics if the infection is suspected to be caused by multi-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, (3) pyelonephritis, in combination with a beta-lactam or quinolone until culture and susceptibility results are obtained, or as monotherapy if a serious allergy to beta-lactam or quinolone antibiotics exists, (4) serious infections caused by multi-resistant Gram-negative bacteria when other alternatives are lacking, and (5) endocarditis caused by difficult-to-treat pathogens when monotherapy with beta-lactam antibiotics is not sufficient. Amikacin is generally more active against extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing and quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli than other aminoglycosides, making it a better option in cases of suspected infection caused by multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Based on their resistance data, local drug committees should decide on the choice of first-line aminoglycoside. Unfortunately, aminoglycoside use is rarely followed up with audiometry, and in Sweden we currently have no systematic surveillance of adverse events after aminoglycoside treatment. We recommend routine assessment of adverse effects, including hearing loss and impairment of renal function, if possible at the start and after treatment with aminoglycosides, and that these data should be included in hospital patient safety surveillance and national quality registries.

Combination therapy for treatment of infections with gram-negative bacteria

Combination antibiotic therapy for invasive infections with Gram-negative bacteria is employed in many health care facilities, especially for certain subgroups of patients, including those with neutropenia, those with infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, those with ventilator-associated pneumonia, and the severely ill. An argument can be made for empiric combination therapy, as we are witnessing a rise in infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms. The wisdom of continued combination therapy after an organism is isolated and antimicrobial susceptibility data are known, however, is more controversial. The available evidence suggests that the greatest benefit of combination antibiotic therapy stems from the increased likelihood of choosing an effective agent during empiric therapy, rather than exploitation of in vitro synergy or the prevention of resistance during definitive treatment. In this review, we summarize the available data comparing monotherapy versus combination antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of infections with Gram-negative bacteria.

Decision-Making Analysis for Selection of Antibiotic Treatment in Intra-Abdominal Infection Using Preference Measurements

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial therapy of abdominal infections is important to the prognosis of affected patients. The choice of antimicrobial therapy must consider effectiveness, safety, cost, and antibiotic resistance, among numerous factors. However, in reality, decisions are made assuming bioequivalence between regimens, without considering the specific attributes of any particular regimen. The objective was to determine the best antibiotic regimen for patients with community-acquired abdominal infection on the basis of a decision analysis that included effectiveness as well as safety, measured as adverse effects.

METHODS

A decision tree was built using information from a systematic review of the literature on the effectiveness of antimicrobial regimens tested in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and the frequency and severity of adverse effects. The quality of the articles was assessed with the Oxford criteria for RCTs. The main outcome was preferences reported by surgeons, measured on a numeric scale. Preferences were obtained using a standard survey that reported each adverse effect with its respective intensity, reversibility, sequelae, duration of symptoms, and necessity for change of antibiotic. Each of the surgeons had to assign a value blindly from 0 to 10, where 10 was the most severe. A sensitivity analysis was conducted varying the frequency of adverse effects.

RESULTS

The regimens analyzed were amikacin-metronidazole, amikacin-clindamycin, ciprofloxacin-metronidazole, ampicillin-sulbactam, ceftriaxone-metronidazole, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ertapenem. The perceived severity of adverse effects reported were: Acute neuromuscular blockade (8.0), severe allergic reaction (7.5), ototoxicity (7.4), nephrotoxicity (7.1), antibiotic-associated colitis (7.0), peripheral neuropathy (5.3), general neurological symptoms (4.9), gastrointestinal symptoms (3.1), and other general symptoms (2.6). Favored regimens were ceftriaxone-metronidazole (1.15), ampicillin-sulbactam (1.24), piperacillin-tazobactam (1.27) and ertapenem (1.28). These strategies dominated the other therapeutic schemes. Sensitivity analysis showed no changes in the dominance reported when the frequency of adverse effects was maintained in the known clinical range.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic regimens that contain aminoglycosides are not bioequivalent to those without aminoglycosides when effectiveness and adverse effects are considered simultaneously. Antibiotic regimens that do not use aminoglycosides must be the first line of treatment for abdominal sepsis acquired in the community.

Application of Bayes theorem to aminoglycoside-associated nephrotoxicity: comparison of extended-interval dosing, individualized pharmacokinetic monitoring, and multiple-daily dosing

The objective of this study was to examine the incidence of aminoglycoside-associated nephrotoxicity related to extended-interval dosing, individualized pharmacokinetic monitoring, and multiple-daily dosing by applying Bayes theorem. An electronic literature search of MEDLINE (1966-2003) and a manual search of references from published meta-analyses and review articles were performed. Studies using extended-interval dosing, individualized pharmacokinetic monitoring, or multiple-daily dosing and reported aminoglycoside-associated nephrotoxicity for patients > or = 16 years of age were included. Quality scores were assigned based on the rigor of definition of aminoglycoside-associated nephrotoxicity, duration of therapy, and length of follow-up of renal function after completion of therapy. Inclusion criteria were then based on these quality scores. Quantitative data on the incidence of aminoglycoside-associated nephrotoxicity were abstracted. Twelve extended-interval dosing studies (n = 916), 10 individualized pharmacokinetic monitoring studies (n = 2066), and 27 multiple-daily dosing studies (n = 4251) met the inclusion criteria. Prior probabilities of aminoglycoside-associated nephrotoxicity were derived from a combination of a review of published studies and expert judgment. The maximum densities for the final posterior probabilities of aminoglycoside-associated nephrotoxicity for extended-interval dosing, individualized pharmacokinetic monitoring, and multiple-daily dosing were located at 12% to 13%, 10% to 11%, and 13% to 14%, respectively. Application of Bayes theorem demonstrates that aminoglycoside dosing by individualized pharmacokinetic monitoring results in less aminoglycoside-associated nephrotoxicity than extended-interval dosing or multiple-daily dosing.

Molecular mechanism of hydrogen peroxide conversion and activation by Cu(II)-amikacin complexes

The interactions between Cu(II)-amikacin complexes [Cu(II)-Ami] and hydrogen peroxide were studied by spectroscopy (EPR, UV-vis, CD, XAS) and cyclic voltammetry. A monomer-dimer equilibrium was detected at complex concentrations above 5 mM (log K(dim) = 1.84 +/- 0.03). The dimeric complex undergoes easy, although irreversible oxidation (ca. 0.5-0.6 V) to a Cu(III) species on platinum electrode. However, the monomeric complexes are able to catalyze hydrogen peroxide disproportionation reaction at pH 7.4 in a multistep process, mediated by hydroxyl radicals and involving both Cu(I)/Cu(II) and Cu(II)/Cu(III) redox pairs.

Hearing loss in critical care: an unappreciated phenomenon

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this article are to review the physiology of hearing; identify acute pathologic and perceived causes of hearing loss in the adult critically ill patient; and to discuss its evaluation, treatment, and prevention.

DATA SOURCES

Computerized bibliographic search of MEDLINE from 1966 to the present of all relevant articles in all languages on acute hearing loss in the adult population.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data gathered from studies and reports of acute hearing loss as relates or potentially relates to the peri-intensive care unit (ICU) period.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Hearing loss is an infrequent but potentially serious complication associated with critical illness. The causes of hearing loss in the ICU patient include mechanical or accidental trauma, administration of ototoxic medications, local or systemic infections, vascular and hematologic disorders, autoimmune diseases, and environmental noise. Patients who are elderly, have coexisting liver or renal failure, or who are receiving concomitantly administered ototoxic drugs are particularly at risk for developing hearing loss. A thorough assessment of potential causes of hearing loss and audiological examination should be undertaken on all ICU patients suspected of hearing loss. Mechanical, pharmacologic, and environmental strategies are available to decrease the incidence of hearing loss in this patient population.

CONCLUSIONS

Hearing loss should be recognized as a potential clinical problem by intensivists. Its causes should be identified and appropriate evaluation and therapy initiated. High risk populations should be identified for preventive measures.

Aminoglycoside-associated nephrotoxicity in extrahepatic obstructive jaundice

Experimental data demonstrate that biliary obstruction increases renal sensitivity to gentamicin. In the present study the incidence of and risk factors for aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity were prospectively studied in patients with extrahepatic obstructive jaundice. Two hundred and thirty-seven hospitalized adult patients were classified into three groups. Group I consisted of 84 patients with extrahepatic obstructive jaundice, who received aminoglycoside (gentamicin or tobramycin). Group II consisted of 81 patients with extrahepatic obstructive jaundice, who received either antibiotics other than aminoglycoside or no antimicrobial therapy. Group III consisted of 72 noncholestatic patients receiving aminoglycosides for different disorders. Nephrotoxicity developed in 27 patients (32%) in group I vs 9 patients (11%) in group II and 4 patients (5.6%) in group III (p < 0.00001). In group I, a comparison of patients with and without nephrotoxicity revealed significantly higher values in the former for mean serum bilirubin concentration, initial steady-state trough aminoglycoside concentration and estimated half-life. Stepwise multivariate analysis with nephrotoxicity status as the dependent variable determined that the most significant variable for predicting nephrotoxicity was serum total bilirubin level. In extrahepatic cholestasis a high serum bilirubin level is a distinct factor predisposing to aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity.