Pfhrp2 Deletions in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Evidence of Absence, or Absence of Evidence?

Malaria diagnosis challenges and pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene deletions using pregnant women as sentinel population in Nanoro region, Burkina Faso

Malaria in pregnancy causes adverse consequences and prompt and accurate diagnosis is essential for case management. In malaria endemic countries, diagnosis is mainly based on rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) and microscopy. However, increasing reports of false negatives caused by low parasitemia and pfhrp2/3 deletions raise concerns about HRP2-based RDT usefulness. This study aimed to assess RDT and microscopy performance and to describe pfhrp2/3 deletions in a cohort of 418 pregnant women in Burkina Faso. Malaria was diagnosed using RDT and microscopy and blood samples were collected during antenatal care visits. Diagnostic results were compared to PCR as gold standard. Pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletions were characterized for patients with confirmed P. falciparum infection. RDT had better sensitivity (76%) but lower specificity (83%) than microscopy (sensitivity = 57%; specificity = 98%). Low parasitemia (<150 parasites/µL), especially in multigravidae, was the principal factor causing false negatives by both methods. Moreover, pfhrp2 deletion frequency among overall false negatives by RDT was 21.43%. Higher frequency of deletions was found among all samples, independently of RDT result, for example around 2% of samples had double deletions meaning that the majority of deletions had no effect on RDT testing. Finally, it was found higher pfhrp2 deletion in women with lower uterine height during the first trimester. Wider and National surveillance study of deletions is recommended among pregnant women and in Burkina Faso.

Low prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum parasites lacking pfhrp2/3 genes among asymptomatic and symptomatic school-age children in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo

Background

Loss of efficacy of diagnostic tests may lead to untreated or mistreated malaria cases, compromising case management and control. There is an increasing reliance on rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria diagnosis, with the most widely used of these targeting the Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP2). There are numerous reports of the deletion of this gene in P. falciparum parasites in some populations, rendering them undetectable by PfHRP2 RDTs. The aim of this study was to identify P. falciparum parasites lacking the P. falciparum histidine rich protein 2 and 3 genes (pfhrp2/3) isolated from asymptomatic and symptomatic school-age children in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.

Methods

The performance of PfHRP2-based RDTs in comparison to microscopy and PCR was assessed using blood samples collected and spotted on Whatman 903™ filter papers between October and November 2019 from school-age children aged 6–14 years. PCR was then used to identify parasite isolates lacking pfhrp2/3 genes.

Results

Among asymptomatic malaria carriers (N = 266), 49%, 65%, and 70% were microscopy, PfHRP2_RDT, and pfldh-qPCR positive, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of RDTs compared to PCR were 80% and 70% while the sensitivity and specificity of RDTs compared to microscopy were 92% and 60%, respectively. Among symptomatic malaria carriers (N = 196), 62%, 67%, and 87% were microscopy, PfHRP2-based RDT, pfldh-qPCR and positive, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of RDTs compared to PCR were 75% and 88%, whereas the sensitivity and specificity of RDTs compared to microscopy were 93% and 77%, respectively. Of 173 samples with sufficient DNA for PCR amplification of pfhrp2/3, deletions of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 were identified in 2% and 1%, respectively. Three (4%) of samples harboured deletions of the pfhrp2 gene in asymptomatic parasite carriers and one (1%) isolate lacked the pfhrp3 gene among symptomatic parasite carriers in the RDT positive subgroup. No parasites lacking the pfhrp2/3 genes were found in the RDT negative subgroup.

Conclusion

Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2/3 gene deletions are uncommon in the surveyed population, and do not result in diagnostic failure. The use of rigorous PCR methods to identify pfhrp2/3 gene deletions is encouraged in order to minimize the overestimation of their prevalence.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-022-04153-2.

Impact of Plasmodium falciparum pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene deletions on malaria control worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Deletion of pfhrp2 and/or pfhrp3 genes cause false negatives in malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and threating malaria control strategies. This systematic review aims to assess the main methodological aspects in the study of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene deletions and its global epidemiological status, with special focus on their distribution in Africa; and its possible impact in RDT.

Methods

The systematic review was conducted by examining the principal issues of study design and methodological workflow of studies addressing pfhrp2 deletion. Meta-analysis was applied to represent reported prevalences of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 single and double deletion in the World Health Organization (WHO) region. Pooled-prevalence of deletions was calculated using DerSimonnian-Laird random effect model. Then, in-deep analysis focused on Africa was performed to assess possible variables related with these deletions. Finally, the impact of these deletions in RDT results was analysed combining reported information about RDT sensitivity and deletion prevalences.

Results

49 articles were included for the systematic review and 37 for the meta-analysis, 13 of them placed in Africa. Study design differs significantly, especially in terms of population sample and information reported, resulting in high heterogeneity between studies that difficulties comparisons and merged conclusions. Reported prevalences vary widely in all the WHO regions, significantly higher deletion were reported in South-Central America, following by Africa and Asia. Pfhrp3 deletion is more prevalent (43% in South-Central America; 3% in Africa; and 1% in Asia) than pfhrp2 deletion (18% in South-Central America; 4% in Africa; and 3% in Asia) worldwide. In Africa, there were not found differences in deletion prevalence by geographical or population origin of samples. The prevalence of deletion among false negatives ranged from 0 to 100% in Africa, but in Asia and South-Central America was only up to 90% and 48%, respectively, showing substantial relation between deletions and false negatives.

Conclusion

The concerning prevalence of pfhrp2, pfhrp3 and pfhrp2/3 gene deletions, as its possible implications in malaria control, highlights the importance of regular and systematic surveillance of these deletions. This review has also outlined that a standardized methodology could play a key role to ensure comparability between studies to get global conclusions.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-021-03812-0.

Laboratory Detection of Malaria Antigens: a Strong Tool for Malaria Research, Diagnosis, and Epidemiology

The identification and characterization of proteins produced during human infection with Plasmodium spp. have guided the malaria community in research, diagnosis, epidemiology, and other efforts. Recently developed methods for the detection of these proteins (antigens) in the laboratory have provided new types of data that can inform the evaluation of malaria diagnostics, epidemiological investigations, and overall malaria control strategies. Here, the focus is primarily on antigens that are currently known to be detectable in human specimens and on their impact on the understanding of malaria in human populations. We highlight historical and contemporary laboratory assays for malaria antigen detection, the concept of an antigen profile for a biospecimen, and ways in which binary results for a panel of antigens could be interpreted and utilized for different analyses. Particular emphasis is given to the direct comparison of field-level malaria diagnostics and laboratory antigen detection for the development of an external evaluation scheme. The current limitations of laboratory antigen detection are considered, and the future of this developing field is discussed.

Analysis of false-negative rapid diagnostic tests for symptomatic malaria in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

The majority of Plasmodium falciparum malaria diagnoses in Africa are made using rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) that detect histidine-rich protein 2. Increasing reports of false-negative RDT results due to parasites with deletions of the pfhrp2 and/or pfhrp3 genes (pfhrp2/3) raise concern about existing malaria diagnostic strategies. We previously identified pfhrp2-negative parasites among asymptomatic children in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), but their impact on diagnosis of symptomatic malaria is unknown. We performed a cross-sectional study of false-negative RDTs in symptomatic subjects in 2017. Parasites were characterized by microscopy; RDT; pfhrp2/3 genotyping and species-specific PCR assays; a bead-based immunoassay for Plasmodium antigens; and/or whole-genome sequencing. Among 3627 symptomatic subjects, 427 (11.8%) had RDT-/microscopy + results. Parasites from eight (0.2%) samples were initially classified as putative pfhrp2/3 deletions by PCR, but antigen testing and whole-genome sequencing confirmed the presence of intact genes. 56.8% of subjects had PCR-confirmed malaria. Non-falciparum co-infection with P. falciparum was common (13.2%). Agreement between PCR and HRP2-based RDTs was satisfactory (Cohen's kappa = 0.66) and superior to microscopy (0.33). Symptomatic malaria due to pfhrp2/3-deleted P. falciparum was not observed. Ongoing HRP2-based RDT use is appropriate for the detection of falciparum malaria in the DRC.

One-step PCR: A novel protocol for determination of pfhrp2 deletion status in Plasmodium falciparum

Histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2) detecting rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have played an important role in enabling prompt malaria diagnosis in remote locations. However, emergence of pfhrp2 deleted parasites is threatening the efficacy of RDTs, and the World Health Organization (WHO) has highlighted surveillance of these deletions as a priority. Nested PCR is used to confirm pfhrp2 deletion but is costly and laborious. Due to spurious amplification of paralogue pfhrp3, the identity of nested exon 1 PCR product must be confirmed by sequencing. Here we describe a new one-step PCR method for detection of pfhrp2. To determine sensitivity and specificity, all PCRs were performed in triplicate. Using photo-induced electron transfer (PET) PCR detecting 18srRNA as true positive, one-step had comparable sensitivity of 95.0% (88.7–98.4%) to nested exon 1, 99.0% (94.6–99.9%) and nested exon 2, 98.0% (93.0–99.8%), and comparable specificity 93.8% (69.8–99.8%) to nested exon 1 100.0% (79.4–100.0%) and nested exon 2, 100.0% (74.4–100.0%). Sequencing revealed that one step PCR does not amplify pfhrp3. Logistic regression models applied to measure the 95% level of detection of the one-step PCR in clinical isolates provided estimates of 133p/μL (95% confidence interval (CI): 3-793p/μL) for whole blood (WB) samples and 385p/μL (95% CI: 31–2133 p/μL) for dried blood spots (DBSs). When considering protocol attributes, the one-step PCR is less expensive, faster and more suitable for high throughput. In summary, we have developed a more accurate PCR method that may be ideal for the application of the WHO protocol for investigating pfhrp2 deletions in symptomatic individuals presenting to health care facilities.

Global analysis of Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein-2 (pfhrp2) and pfhrp3 gene deletions using whole-genome sequencing data and meta-analysis

Many rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) used on suspected malaria cases are based on the detection of the protein encoded by the Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein-2 (pfhrp2) gene, which shares a high sequence homology with pfhrp3 in the 3D7 reference genome. Parasite isolates showing pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene deletions have been emerging over the years, but a comprehensive genetic analysis of these variants is still lacking. With this purpose, genomic data from experimental P. falciparum genetic crosses between different laboratory lines (3D7, HB3, DD2, 7G8 and GB4) were first analysed (n = 98). The frequency of pfhrp2 deletions was consistent with a Mendelian prediction in HB3 × DD2 (56.7%; 95%CI = (39.5%-72.9%)). Moreover, the pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletions segregated independently of each other in the same genetic cross. Analysis of 3D7 × HB3 and 7G8 × GB4 estimated the probability of spontaneously generating a pfhrp2 deletion during sexual recombination to be up to 6.2%. Next, whole genome sequence data from 1970 P. falciparum isolates collected globally were analysed. Nine samples displayed depth of coverage consistent with pfhrp2 deletions (0.5%), but the corresponding split-read analysis could not confirm deletions in seven of these samples. Twenty-eight isolates had evidence of pfhrp3 deletions (1.4%), which are widespread in Southeast Asia. Finally, a meta-analysis of published data revealed a positive mean association between the frequencies of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletions in Africa and South America. This result suggested a shared selective pressure acting on these genetic variants. In conclusion, evidence of genetic selection on both pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletions was presented, but experimental crosses do not provide evidence of a fitness cost of these variants. Further work is urgently needed to accurately determine the prevalence and the degree of association between these genetic variants, and the respective impact on diagnostic accuracy of many in-use RDT.