Rethinking disease eradication: putting countries first

Trachoma

Trachoma is a neglected tropical disease caused by infection with conjunctival strains of Chlamydia trachomatis. It can result in blindness. Pathophysiologically, trachoma is a disease complex composed of two linked chronic processes: a recurrent, generally subclinical infectious-inflammatory disease that mostly affects children, and a non-communicable, cicatricial and, owing to trichiasis, eventually blinding disease that supervenes in some individuals later in life. At least 150 infection episodes over an individual's lifetime are needed to precipitate trichiasis; thus, opportunity exists for a just global health system to intervene to prevent trachomatous blindness. Trachoma is found at highest prevalence in the poorest communities of low-income countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa; in June 2021, 1.8 million people worldwide were going blind from the disease. Blindness attributable to trachoma can appear in communities many years after conjunctival C. trachomatis transmission has waned or ceased; therefore, the two linked disease processes require distinct clinical and public health responses. Surgery is offered to individuals with trichiasis and antibiotic mass drug administration and interventions to stimulate facial cleanliness and environmental improvement are designed to reduce infection prevalence and transmission. Together, these interventions comprise the SAFE strategy, which is achieving considerable success. Although much work remains, a continuing public health problem from trachoma in the year 2030 will be difficult for the world to excuse.

Preferences of Persons with or at Risk for Hepatitis C for Long-Acting Treatments

BACKGROUND

Whereas safe, curative treatments for hepatitis C virus (HCV) have been available since 2015, there are still 58 million infected persons worldwide, and global elimination may require new paradigms. We sought to understand the acceptability of long-acting HCV treatment approaches.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, 43-question survey was administered to 1457 individuals with HCV or at risk of HCV at 28 sites in 9 countries to assess comparative interest in a variety of long-acting strategies in comparison to oral pills.

RESULTS

Among HCV-positive participants, 37.7% most preferred an injection, 5.6% an implant, and 6% a gastric residence device, as compared to 50.8% who stated they would most prefer taking 1 to 3 pills per day. When compared directly to taking pills, differences were observed in the relative preference for an injection based on age (p<0.001), location (p<0.001), and prior receipt of HCV treatment (p=0.005), but not sex. When an implant was compared to pills, greater preference was represented by women (p=0.01) and adults of younger ages (p=0.012 per 5 years). Among participants without HCV, 49.5% felt that injections are stronger than pills, and 34.7% preferred taking injections to pills. Among those at-risk participants who had received injectable medications in the past, 123 out of 137 (89.8%) expressed willingness to receive one in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

These data point to high acceptability of long-acting treatments, which for a substantial minority, might even be preferred to pills for the treatment of HCV infection. Long-acting treatments for HCV infection might contribute to global efforts to eliminate hepatitis C.