1
|
Boru TM, Tefera EG, Bulto GA, Doba YS, Wakgari N, Roga EY, Ganfure G, Geda GM, Erena MM. Maternity waiting home utilization among women who gave birth in the pastoralist communities of Borana Zone, Ethiopia: A community-based mixed-method study design. Heliyon 2024; 10:e32925. [PMID: 38988556 PMCID: PMC11234036 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Maternity Waiting Home (MWH) utilization is valuable for enhancing maternal and neonatal health service utilization. Although few studies have been conducted in non-pastoral areas, more evidence is needed from pastoralist communities. Hence, the study aimed to assess the utilization of MWH and its associated factors among women in pastoralist communities in Ethiopia. Methods A concurrent mixed-method design was conducted from 10 Augustto15 September 2021. The cluster sampling technique was used to select the study participants. Qualitative data was collected through focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. Multivariable logistic regression analysis is used to identify significant factors. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed and triangulated with quantitative findings. Results Only 13 % (95%CI:10.5-15.6) of women had utilized MWHs. Husbands participation in antenatal care (AOR = 5.54, 95%CI: 2.14-14.35), having caregivers at home (AOR = 2.59, 95%CI: 1.14-4.86), attending pregnant-women conferences (AOR = 5.01, 95%CI: 2.17-11.49), the husband received information about MWH (AOR = 3.6, 95%CI: 1.54-8.49), favorable attitude towards MWH (AOR = 3.15, 95%CI:1.47-6.77), birth during the rainy season (AOR = 0.35, 95%CI: 0.15-0.81) and residing within 10 km of a health center (AOR = 0.15,95%CI:0.04-0.58) were significantly associated with MWH utilization. The main themes that emerged as barriers to MWH utilization were lack of awareness, availability and accessibility of the services, norms and perceptions, lack of decision-making power, family support and women's workload. Conclusion The study found low utilization of MWHs. Husbands' involvement, having information about MWHs, a favorable attitude, the season of birth, and distance were significantly associated. Lack of transportation access, norms, and limited awareness of MWH were also found to be barriers to service utilization. Health education to raise awareness about the importance of MWHs, enabling transportation access, husbands' involvement, and encouraging women to take an active role in household decision-making are crucial to boosting MWH utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eden Girmaye Tefera
- Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia
| | - Gizachew Abdissa Bulto
- Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia
| | - Yonas Sagni Doba
- Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hosana, Ethiopia
| | - Negash Wakgari
- Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia
| | - Ephrem Yohannes Roga
- Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia
| | - Gemechu Ganfure
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia
| | - Gonfa Moti Geda
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia
| | - Maru Mossisa Erena
- Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tilahun D, Shaka MF, Belay MM. Determinants of maternity waiting home utilization among women who gave birth in public health facilities in the Gedeo Zone, southern Ethiopia: an unmatched case-control study. Front Glob Womens Health 2023; 4:1170843. [PMID: 37654684 PMCID: PMC10465344 DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1170843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Maternal mortality remains unacceptably high in Ethiopia, although most of its causes are preventable. One way of tackling this problem is by establishing a maternal waiting home (MWH) close to a health facility. Although the benefits of an MWH have been well-documented, the determinants of its use have not been well-studied. This study aims to identify the determinants of utilization of an MWH among women who gave birth in public health facilities in the Gedeo Zone, southern Ethiopia. Methods A facility-based unmatched case-control study was conducted between January 2020 and February 2020) among 129 patients belonging to the case group and 257 belonging to the control group. The data were entered into the Epi-Data version 3.1 and exported to the SPSS version 20 statistical package for analysis. Descriptive statistics such as frequency, means, and standard deviations were computed. The association between variables was checked using logistic regression analysis, and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to determine the strength of this association. A p-value of < 0.05 was used as a cutoff point to measure statistical significance. Result A total of 378 respondents (126 cases and 252 controls) were included in the study, successfully achieving a response rate of 97.9%. The mean age of the participants was 27.4 (±5.6 SD) years, which was 28.4 (±5.5 SD) years for case group patients and 26.9 (±5.69 SD) years for control group patients. The educational status of women [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 8.49, 95% CI: 2.91-24.7], travel time (AOR: 2.92, 95% CI:1.41-4.67), antenatal care visits (AOR: 3.54, 95% CI: 1.33-9.38), those having more than two children under the age of 5 years (AOR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.06-0.26), those with a history of complications in previous childbirths (AOR: 4.52 95% CI: 2.41-8.47), previous place of delivery (AOR: 6.30, 95% CI: 2.71-14.78), and a lack of awareness (AOR: 5.8, 95% CI: 2.23-15.2) were all significantly associated with the utilization of an MWH. Conclusion Educational status, antenatal care follow-up, number of children under 5 years old in the household, previous place of delivery, lack of awareness regarding maternal waiting home service, and travel time were all determinants of MWH use. This implies that interventions focusing on promoting antenatal care visits, institutional delivery, and raising awareness of the benefits of MWHs are important for improving their rate of utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Moges Mareg Belay
- Department of Reproductive Health, Dilla University College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Dilla, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Braam EJ, McRae DN, Portela AG, Stekelenburg J, Penn-Kekana L. Stakeholders' perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of maternity waiting homes: a qualitative synthesis. Reprod Health 2023; 20:101. [PMID: 37407983 PMCID: PMC10324180 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-023-01615-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maternity waiting homes (MHWs) are recommended to help bridge the geographical gap to accessing maternity services. This study aimed to provide an analysis of stakeholders' perspectives (women, families, communities and health workers) on the acceptability and feasibility of MWHs. METHODS A qualitative evidence synthesis was conducted. Studies that were published between January 1990 and July 2020, containing qualitative data on the perspectives of the stakeholder groups were included. A combination of inductive and deductive coding and thematic synthesis was used to capture the main perspectives in a thematic framework. RESULTS Out of 4,532 papers that were found in the initial search, a total of 38 studies were included for the thematic analysis. Six themes emerged: (1) individual factors, such as perceived benefits, awareness and knowledge of the MWH; (2) interpersonal factors and domestic responsibilities, such as household and childcare responsibilities, decision-making processes and social support; (3) MWH characteristics, such as basic services and food provision, state of MWH infrastructure; (4) financial and geographical accessibility, such as transport availability, costs for MWH attendance and loss of income opportunity; (5) perceived quality of care in the MWH and the adjacent health facility, including regular check-ups by health workers and respectful care; and (6) Organization and advocacy, for example funding, community engagement, governmental involvement. The decision-making process of women and their families for using an MWH involves balancing out the gains and losses, associated with all six themes. CONCLUSION This systematic synthesis of qualitative literature provides in-depth insights of interrelating factors that influence acceptability and feasibility of MWHs according to different stakeholders. The findings highlight the potential of MWHs as important links in the maternal and neonatal health (MNH) care delivery system. The complexity and scope of these determinants of utilization underlines the need for MWH implementation strategy to be guided by context. Better documentation of MWH implementation, is needed to understand which type of MWH is most effective in which setting, and to ensure that those who most need the MWH will use it and receive quality services. These results can be of interest for stakeholders, implementers of health interventions, and governmental parties that are responsible for MNH policy development to implement acceptable and feasible MWHs that provide the greatest benefits for its users. Trial registration Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO 2020, CRD42020192219.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daphne N McRae
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Anayda G Portela
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child, and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jelle Stekelenburg
- Department of Health Sciences, Global Health Unit, University Medical Centre Groningen/University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeuwarden Medical Centre, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Loveday Penn-Kekana
- Department of Maternal Health and Health Systems, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Benefits, barriers and enablers of maternity waiting homes utilization in Ethiopia: an integrative review of national implementation experience to date. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:675. [PMID: 36056301 PMCID: PMC9438264 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04954-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Though Ethiopia has expanded Maternity Waiting Homes (MWHs) to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality, the utilization rate is low. To maximize the use of MWH, policymakers must be aware of the barriers and benefits of using MWH. This review aimed to describe the evidence on the barriers and benefits to access and use of MWHs in Ethiopia. Methods Data were sourced from PubMed, Google Scholars and Dimensions. Thirty-one studies were identified as the best evidence for inclusion in this review. We adopted an integrative review process based on the five-stage process proposed by Whittemore and Knafl. Results The key themes identified were the benefits, barriers and enablers of MWH utilization with 10 sub-themes. The themes about benefits of MWHs were lower incidence rate of perinatal death and complications, the low incidence rate of maternal complications and death, and good access to maternal health care. The themes associated with barriers to staying at MWH were distance, transportation, financial costs (higher out-of-pocket payments), the physical aspects of MWHs, cultural constraints and lack of awareness regarding MWHs, women’s perceptions of the quality of care at MWHs, and poor provider interaction to women staying at MWH. Enablers to pregnant women to stay at MWHs were availability of MWHs which are attached with obstetric services with quality and compassionate care. Conclusion This study synthesized research evidence on MWH implementation, aiming to identify benefits, barriers, and enablers for MWH implementation in Ethiopia. Despite the limited and variable evidence, the implementation of the MWH strategy is an appropriate strategy to improve access to skilled birth attendance in rural Ethiopia. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04954-y.
Collapse
|
5
|
Planning for Maternity Waiting Home Bed Capacity: Lessons from Rural Zambia. Ann Glob Health 2022; 88:37. [PMID: 35651969 PMCID: PMC9138814 DOI: 10.5334/aogh.3691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Maternity waiting homes (MWH) allow pregnant women to stay in a residential facility close to a health center while awaiting delivery. This approach can improve health outcomes for women and children. Health planners need to consider many factors in deciding the number of beds needed for an MWH. Objective: The objective of the study is to review experience in Zambia in planning and implementing MWHs, and consider lessons learned in determining optimal capacity. Methods: We conducted a study of 10 newly built MWH in Zambia over 12 months. For this case study analysis, data on beds, service volume, and catchment area population were examined, including women staying at the homes, bed occupancy, and average length of stay. We analyzed bed occupancy by location and health facility catchment area size, and categorized occupancy by month from very low to very high. Findings: Most study sites were rural, with 3 of the 10 study sites rural-remote. Four sites served small catchment areas (<9 000), 3 had medium (9 000–11 000), and 3 had large (>11 000) size populations. Annual occupancy was variable among the sites, ranging from 13% (a medium rural site) to 151% (a large rural-remote site). Occupancy higher than 100% was accommodated by repurposing the MWH postnatal beds and using extra mattresses. Most sites had between 26–69% annual occupancy, but monthly occupancy was highly variable for reasons that seem unrelated to catchment area size, rural or rural-remote location. Conclusion: Planning for MWH capacity is difficult due to high variability. Our analysis suggests planners should try to gather actual recent monthly birth data and estimate capacity using the highest expected utilization months, anticipating that facility-based deliveries may increase with introduction of a MWH. Further research is needed to document and share data on MWH operations, including utilization statistics like number of beds, mattresses, occupancy rates and average length of stay.
Collapse
|
6
|
Dereje S, Yenus H, Amare G, Amare T. Maternity waiting homes utilization and associated factors among childbearing women in rural settings of Finfinnee special zone, central Ethiopia: A community based cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0265182. [PMID: 35298504 PMCID: PMC8929623 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Maternity waiting home (MWH) is one of the strategies designed for improved access to comprehensive obstetric care for pregnant women living far from health facilities. Hence, it is vital to promote MWHs for pregnant women in Ethiopia, where most people reside in rural settings and have a high mortality rate. Therefore, this study aimed to assess MWHs utilization and associated factors among women who gave birth in the rural settings of Finfinnee special zone, central Ethiopia. Methods A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from 15th October to 20th November 2019 among women who gave birth in the last six months before data collection. Multistage random sampling was employed among 636 women from six rural kebeles to collect data through a face-to-face interview. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was fitted, and a 95% confidence level with a p-value <0.05 was used to determine the level and significance of the association. Results Overall, MWHs utilization was 34.0% (30.3% - 37.7%). The higher age (AOR: 4.77; 95% CI: 2.76–8.24), career women (AOR: 0.39 95% CI: 0.20–0.74), non-farmer husband (AOR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.14–0.55), rich women (AOR:1.84; 95% CI: 1.12–3.02), living greater than 60 minutes far from a health facility (AOR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.16–2.80), and four and more livebirths (AOR: 5.72; 95% CI: 1.53–21.35) significantly associated with MWHs utilization. The common services provided were latrine, bedding, and health professional checkups with 98.2%, 96.8%, and 75.4%, respectively. Besides, feeding service was provided by 39.8%. The primary reason not to use MWHs was the absence of enough information on MWHs. Conclusion One-third of the women who delivered within the last six months utilized MWHs in the Finfinnee special zone. Our results support the primary purpose of MWHs, that women far from the health facility are more likely to utilize MWHs, but lack of adequate information is the reason not to use MWHs. Therefore, it is better to promote MWHs to fill the information gap among women with geographical barriers to reach health facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surafel Dereje
- Maternal and child health office, Finfinnee special zone health department, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Hedija Yenus
- Department of Reproductive Health, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Getasew Amare
- Department of Health Systems and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Tsegaw Amare
- Department of Health Systems and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Smith S, Henrikson H, Thapa R, Tamang S, Rajbhandari R. Maternity Waiting Home Interventions as a Strategy for Improving Birth Outcomes: A Scoping Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Glob Health 2022; 88:8. [PMID: 35087708 PMCID: PMC8782095 DOI: 10.5334/aogh.3496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Over 300 000 women worldwide die due to pregnancy-related complications annually, with most occurring in developing countries where access to skilled obstetric care is limited. Maternity waiting homes (MWHs) are one intervention designed to increase access to skilled prenatal care in resource-limited settings. MWHs are defined as accommodations at or near a health facility where pregnant women can stay in the final weeks of their pregnancy so they can be easily transferred to the health facility to give birth. While MWHs have existed for decades, evidence regarding their effectiveness in reducing adverse birth outcomes has been mixed. The objective of this study is to comprehensively assess all available MWH research reporting quantitative maternal and childbirth data to determine whether MWHs are an effective maternal health strategy in resource-limited settings. METHODOLOGY We conducted a scoping review and meta-analysis of existing literature on MWHs according to PRISMA guidelines. Descriptive statistics and odds ratios were calculated for the following birth outcomes: maternal mortality, perinatal mortality, and caesarian section. Quantitative analysis was conducted in RStudio and Stata Version 16. RESULTS One hundred seventy-one records were retrieved from our initial database search, of which 66 were identified as relevant. Only 15 of these records reported quantitative data on the health outcomes of interest and therefore met inclusion criteria for our meta-analysis. All studies reporting maternal mortality demonstrated a protective effect of MWHs (aggregate OR: 0.19 [0.10, 0.40]), as did all studies reporting perinatal mortality (aggregate OR: 0.29 [0.16, 0.53]). Studies reporting caesarian section were more varied and indicated less of a protective effect (aggregate OR: 1.80 [1.18, 2.75]). CONCLUSIONS There is some indication that MWHs are an effective strategy for reducing maternal and perinatal mortality in resource-limited settings. However, our analysis was constrained by the observational design of most prior MWH studies. More rigorous MWH evaluations, ideally in the form of randomized-control trials, are needed to better determine MWH effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Smith
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Department of Medicine, Division of Global Health Equity, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hannah Henrikson
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Department of Medicine, Division of Global Health Equity, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rita Thapa
- Nick Simons Institute, Sanepa, Lalitpur, Nepal
| | | | - Ruma Rajbhandari
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Department of Medicine, Division of Global Health Equity, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Mount Auburn Hospital, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Aden M, Azale T, Tadie C. Intention to Use and Predictors of Use of Maternity Waiting Home among Pregnant Women in Hargeisa City Health Centers, Somaliland. Patient Prefer Adherence 2022; 16:1595-1603. [PMID: 35795009 PMCID: PMC9252294 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s358952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maternity waiting homes (MWHs) can help women receive the necessary obstetric care and referral if needed. However, there is a lack of evidence on whether women have the desire to stay away from their homes and the sociocultural predictors of their decision in Somaliland. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to measure predictors of the intention of women to stay in MWHs using the theory of planned behavior in Hargeisa city, Somaliland. METHODS A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from in April 2021 in Hargeisa health facilities among 422 randomly selected participants using an interviewer-administered and structured questionnaire. Data were transferred to Epi Data 4.6 and exported to SPSS 20 for further analysis. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were used. ORs with 95% CIs were used to assess associations, and statistical significance was set at P<0.05. RESULTS A total of 245 (58%, 95% CI 53.1%-62.8%) pregnant women intended to use an MWH. Multivariate analysis revealed that education (AOR 5.40, 95% CI 3.01-9.69), experience of using an MWH (AOR 3.80, 95% CI 2.32-6.27), multigravidity (AOR 2.2, 95% CI 1.16-4.29), subjective norms (AOR 1.8, 95% CI 1.05-3.11), indirect attitudes toward use of MWHs (AOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.01-3.92), and indirect subjective norms (AOR 2.0, 95% CI 1.16-3.60) were significantly associated with intention to use an MWH. CONCLUSION Using an MWH is not the preference of many women. Personal characteristics, such as education, multigravidity, and perceived social pressure are important predictors of intention to use MWHs. It is important to raise the awareness of women and the community about the benefits of using MWHs in the early management of obstetric complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Aden
- Ministry of Plan and National Development, Hargeisa, Somaliland
| | - Telake Azale
- Department of Health Education and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
- Correspondence: Telake Azale, Email
| | - Chalie Tadie
- Department of Health Systems and Policy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Horton R, Lee H, Perosky JE, Kofa A, Lori JR. Comparison of quality, birth outcomes, and service utilization between health facilities with and without maternity waiting homes in Liberia. Midwifery 2021; 105:103235. [PMID: 34959000 PMCID: PMC8811480 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE 1) To assess the quality of health facilities associated with functional Maternity Waiting Homes and health facilities without functional maternity waiting homes in Liberia. 2) To examine birth outcomes and care utilization amongst health facilities with and without functional maternity waiting homes in Liberia. DESIGN Secondary analysis design using data from a facility capacity checklist and Liberia's Health Management Information System. SETTING 71 health facilities associated with functional maternity waiting homes and 14 health facilities without functional maternity waiting homes across 14 counties of Liberia. PARTICIPANTS No human participants were used in this study. METHODS Independent t-test, Pearson chi-square test, and logistic regression were performed to assess quality, birth outcomes, and service utilization between health facilities with and without functional maternity waiting homes. FINDINGS The overall health facility quality was not significantly different between health facilities associated with functional maternity waiting homes and those without. However, health facilities with functional maternity waiting homes had better infection control with the presence of soap and sharps boxes. Health facilities with functional maternity waiting homes were also more likely to have parenteral oxytocic drugs and were better able to perform assisted vaginal deliveries. The presence of functional maternity waiting homes were not significantly associated with health facility quality, birth outcomes, or care utilization. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS Health facilities with functional MWHs were better prepared to prevent infection and manage complicated deliveries. This study further highlights specific areas for quality improvement amongst these health facilities, including labor complications management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Horton
- Undergraduate Student, University of Michigan, School of Nursing, 400 North Ingalls, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, United States.
| | - Haeun Lee
- Graduate Student, University of Michigan, School of Nursing, 400 North Ingalls, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, United States.
| | - Joseph E Perosky
- Resident Physician, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, 400 North Ingalls, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, United States.
| | | | - Jody R Lori
- Professor & Associate Dean for Global Affairs, University of Michigan, School of Nursing, 400 North Ingalls, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tayebwa E, Kalisa R, Ndibaza AF, Cornelissen L, Teeselink EK, Kim YM, van Dillen J, Stekelenburg J. Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes among Maternity Waiting Home Users and Non-Users in Rural Rwanda. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph182111211. [PMID: 34769730 PMCID: PMC8583170 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182111211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Most maternal and perinatal deaths could be prevented through timely access to skilled birth attendants. Women should access appropriate obstetric care during pregnancy, labor, and puerperium. Maternity waiting homes (MWHs) permit access to emergency obstetric care when labor starts. This study compared maternal and perinatal outcomes among MWH users and non-users through a retrospective cohort study. Data were collected through obstetric chart reviews and analyzed using STATA version 15. Of the 8144 deliveries reported between 2015 and 2019, 1305 women had high-risk pregnancies and were included in the study. MWH users had more spontaneous vaginal deliveries compared to non-users (38.6% versus 16.8%) and less cesarean sections (57.7% versus 76.7%). Maternal morbidities such as postpartum hemorrhage occurred less frequently among users than non-users (2.13% versus 5.64%). Four women died among non-users while there was no death among users. Non-users had more stillbirths than users (7.68% versus 0.91%). The MWH may have contributed to the observed differences in outcomes. However, many women with high risk pregnancies did not use the MWH, indicating a probable gap in awareness, usefulness, or their inability to stay due to other responsibilities at home. Use of MWHs at scale could improve maternal and perinatal outcomes in Rwanda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwin Tayebwa
- University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Health Sciences, Global Health, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands;
- Correspondence: (E.T.); (R.K.)
| | - Richard Kalisa
- IntraHealth International, Kigali 6639, Rwanda;
- School of Public Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali 3286, Rwanda
- Correspondence: (E.T.); (R.K.)
| | | | - Lisa Cornelissen
- Gelre Hospital, Albert Schweitzerlaan 31, 7334 DZ Apeldoorn, The Netherlands;
| | - Eefje Klein Teeselink
- Amalia Children’s Hospital, Radboudumc Nijmegen, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (E.K.T.); (J.v.D.)
| | - Young-Mi Kim
- Jhpiego, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA;
| | - Jeroen van Dillen
- Amalia Children’s Hospital, Radboudumc Nijmegen, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (E.K.T.); (J.v.D.)
| | - Jelle Stekelenburg
- University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Health Sciences, Global Health, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands;
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeuwarden Medical Centre, 8934 AD Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Erickson AK, Abdalla S, Serenska A, Demeke B, Darmstadt GL. Association between maternity waiting home stay and obstetric outcomes in Yetebon, Ethiopia: a mixed-methods observational cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21:482. [PMID: 34217232 PMCID: PMC8254337 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03913-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A strategy for reducing adverse pregnancy outcomes is the expanded implementation of maternity waiting homes (MWHs). We assessed factors influencing MWH use, as well as the association between MWH stay and obstetric outcomes in a hospital in rural Ethiopia. Methods Data from medical records of the Glenn C. Olson Memorial Primary Hospital obstetric ward were cross matched with records from the affiliated MWH between 1 and 2011 to 31 March 2014. Poisson regression with robust variance was conducted to estimate the relative risk (RR) of childbirth complications associated with MWH use vs. non-use. Five key informant interviews of a convenience sample of three MWH staff and two users were conducted and a thematic analysis performed of social, cultural, and economic factors underlying MWH use. Results During the study period, 489 women gave birth at the hospital, 93 of whom were MWH users. Common reasons for using the MWH were post-term status, previous caesarean section/myomectomy, malposition/malpresentation, and low-lying placenta, placenta previa, or antepartum hemorrhage, and hypertension or preeclampsia. MWH users were more likely than non-users to have had a previous caesarean Sec. (15.1 % vs. 5.3 %, p < 0.001) and to be post-term (21.5 % vs. 3.8 %, p < 0.001). MWH users were also more likely to undergo a caesarean Sec. (51.0 % vs. 35.4 %, p < 0.05) and less likely (p < 0.05) to have a spontaneous vaginal delivery (49.0 % vs. 63.6 %), obstructed labor (6.5 % vs. 14.4 %) or stillbirth (1.1 % vs. 8.6 %). MWH use (N = 93) was associated with a 77 % (adjusted RR = 0.23, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) 0.12–0.46, p < 0.001) lower risk of childbirth complications, a 94 % (adjusted RR = 0.06, 95 % CI 0.01–0.43, p = 0.005) lower risk of fetal and newborn complications, and a 73 % (adjusted RR = 0.27, 95 % CI 0.13–0.56, p < 0.001) lower risk of maternal complications compared to MWH non-users (N = 396). Birth weight [median 3.5 kg (interquartile range 3.0-3.8) vs. 3.2 kg (2.8–3.5), p < 0.001] and 5-min Apgar scores (adjusted difference = 0.25, 95 % CI 0.06–0.44, p < 0.001) were also higher in offspring of MWH users. Opportunity costs due to missed work and need to arrange for care of children at home, long travel times, and lack of entertainment were suggested as key barriers to MWH utilization. Conclusions This observational, non-randomized study suggests that MWH usage was associated with significantly improved childbirth outcomes. Increasing facility quality, expanding services, and providing educational opportunities should be considered to increase MWH use. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-03913-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne K Erickson
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.,Present address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Safa Abdalla
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Gary L Darmstadt
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
McRae DN, Bergen N, Portela AG, Muhajarine N. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of maternity waiting homes in low- and middle-income countries. Health Policy Plan 2021; 36:1215-1235. [PMID: 34179952 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czab010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Maternity waiting homes (MWHs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) provide women with accommodation close to a health facility to enable timely access to skilled care at birth. We examined whether MWH use and availability compared with non-use/unavailability were associated with facility birth, birth with a skilled health professional, attendance at postnatal visit(s) and/or improved maternal and newborn health, in LMICs. We included (non-)randomized controlled, interrupted time series, controlled before-after, cohort and case-control studies published since 1990. Thirteen databases were searched with no language restrictions. Included studies (1991-2020) were assessed as either moderate (n = 9) or weak (n = 10) on individual quality using the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool. Quality was most frequently compromised by selection bias, confounding and blinding. Only moderate quality studies were analyzed; no studies examining maternal morbidity/mortality met this criterion. MWH users had less relative risk (RR) of perinatal mortality [RR 0.65, 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 0.48, 0.87] (3 studies) and low birthweight (RR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.20, 0.59) (2 studies) compared with non-users. There were no significant differences between MWH use and non-use for stillbirth (RR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.47, 1.18) (3 studies) or neonatal mortality (RR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.25, 1.02) (2 studies). Single study results demonstrated higher adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for facility birth (aOR 5.8, 95% CI: 2.6, 13.0) and attendance at all recommended postnatal visits within 6 weeks of birth (aOR 1.99, 95% CI: 1.30, 3.07) for MWH users vs. non-users. The presence vs. absence of an MWH was associated with a 19% increase in facility birth (aOR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.29). The presence vs. absence of a hospital-affiliated MWH predicted a 47% lower perinatal mortality rate (P < 0.01), but at a healthcare centre-level a 13 higher perinatal mortality rate (P < 0.01). Currently, there remains a lack of robust evidence supporting MWH effectiveness. We outline a six-point strategy for strengthening the evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne N McRae
- Saskatchewan Population Health and Evaluation Research Unit, University of Saskatchewan, 104 Clinic Place, Saskatoon SK, S7N 2Z4, Canada
| | - Nicole Bergen
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Montpetit Hall, 125 University, Ottawa ON, K1N 6N5, Canada
| | - Anayda G Portela
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child, and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202 Genève, Switzerland
| | - Nazeem Muhajarine
- Saskatchewan Population Health and Evaluation Research Unit, University of Saskatchewan, 104 Clinic Place, Saskatoon SK, S7N 2Z4, Canada.,Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, 107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon SK, S7N 5E5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dalla Zuanna T, Fonzo M, Sperotto M, Resti C, Tsegaye A, Azzimonti G, Manenti F, Putoto G, Bertoncello C. The effectiveness of maternity waiting homes in reducing perinatal mortality: a case-control study in Ethiopia. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:bmjgh-2020-004140. [PMID: 33863756 PMCID: PMC8055136 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development aims to reduce neonatal mortality to at least 12 per 1000 live births. Most of the causes can be prevented or cured. Access to quality healthcare during pregnancy and labour is the key to reduce perinatal deaths, and maternity waiting homes (MWHs) may have an impact, especially for women who live far from the healthcare system. We conducted a case–control study to evaluate the effectiveness of MWH in reducing perinatal mortality in a secondary hospital in Ethiopia. Methods We did a nested case–control study from January 2014 through December 2017. The enrolled cases were mothers whose childbirth resulted in stillbirth or early neonatal death. The controls were mothers with an alive baby at 7 days or with an alive baby on discharge. We collected demographic, anamnestic, pregnancy-related and obstetric-related data. The effectiveness of the MWH on perinatal death was assessed by a logistic regression model, adjusted for all other variables investigated as potential confounders. We also did a sensitivity analysis to explore the role of twin pregnancies. Results We included 1175 cases and 2350 controls. The crude analysis showed a protective effect of the MWH towards perinatal mortality (OR=0.700; 95% CI: 0.505 to 0.972), even more protective after adjustment for confounders (adjusted OR (AOR)=0.452; 95% CI: 0.293 to 0.698). Sensitivity analyses showed a consistent result, even excluding twin pregnancies (AOR=0.550; 95% CI: 0.330 to 0.917). Conclusion MWHs appear to reduce perinatal mortality by 55%. Our findings support the decision to invest in MWH to support pregnant women with higher quality and more comprehensive healthcare strategy, including quality antenatal care in peripheral primary care clinics, where risk factors can be recognised and women can be addressed for admission to MWH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Dalla Zuanna
- Hygiene and Public Health Unit, Department of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Marco Fonzo
- Hygiene and Public Health Unit, Department of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Milena Sperotto
- Hygiene and Public Health Unit, Department of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Ademe Tsegaye
- Addis Ababa Coordination Office, Doctors with Africa CUAMM, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | | | - Fabio Manenti
- Headquarters, Doctors with Africa CUAMM, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Bertoncello
- Hygiene and Public Health Unit, Department of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kurji J, Hackett K, Wild K, Lassi Z. The effect of maternity waiting homes on perinatal mortality is inconclusive: a critical appraisal of existing evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Res Notes 2021; 14:86. [PMID: 33750459 PMCID: PMC7942174 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-021-05501-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the appropriateness of the statistical methodology used in a recent meta-analysis investigating the effect of maternity waiting homes (MWHs) on perinatal mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa. RESULTS A recent meta-analysis published in BMC Research Notes used a fixed-effect model to generate an unadjusted summary estimate of the effectiveness of MWHs in reducing perinatal mortality in Africa using ten observational studies (pooled odds ratio 0.15, 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.17). The authors concluded that MWHs reduce perinatal mortality by over 80% and should be incorporated into routine maternal health care services. In the present article, we illustrate that due to the contextual and methodological heterogeneity present in existing studies, the authors' conclusions about the effectiveness of MWHs in reducing perinatal mortality were likely overstated. Additionally, we argue that because of the selection bias and confounding inherent in observational studies, unadjusted pooled estimates provide little causal evidence for effectiveness. Additional studies with robust designs are required before an appropriately designed meta-analysis can be conducted; until then, the ability to draw causal inferences regarding the effectiveness of MWHs in reducing perinatal mortality is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaameeta Kurji
- School of Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, ON, K1G 5Z3, Canada
| | - Kristy Hackett
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Kayli Wild
- Judith Lumley Centre and Institute for Human Security & Social Change, La Trobe University, Plenty Road, Bundoora, Melbourne, 3086, Australia
| | - Zohra Lassi
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Helen Mayo North, 30 Frome Street, Adelaide, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gurara MK, Van Geertruyden JP, Gutema BT, Draulans V, Jacquemyn Y. Maternity waiting homes as component of birth preparedness and complication readiness for rural women in hard-to-reach areas in Ethiopia. Reprod Health 2021; 18:27. [PMID: 33531033 PMCID: PMC7856798 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01086-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In rural areas of Ethiopia, 57% of births occur at home without the assistance of skilled birth attendants, geographical inaccessibility being one of the main factors that hinder skilled birth attendance. Establishment of maternity waiting homes (MWH) is part of a strategy to improve access to skilled care by bringing pregnant women physically close to health facilities. This study assessed barriers to MWHs in Arba Minch Zuria District, Southern Ethiopia. Methods A community-based cross-sectional study was undertaken from February 01 to 28, 2019. Study participants were selected by computer-generated random numbers from a list of women who gave birth from 2017 to 2018 in Arba Minch Health and Demographic Surveillance System site. Data were collected using a pre-tested and interviewer-administered questionnaire. Stata software version-15 was used for data management and analysis, and variables with p-values ≤ 0.2 in bivariate analysis were considered for multivariable logistic regression analysis. Level of statistical significance was declared at a p-value < 0.05. Qualitative data were analyzed manually based on thematic areas. Results MWH utilization was found to be 8.4%. Wealth index (lowest wealth quintile aOR 7.3; 95% CI 1.2, 42), decisions made jointly with male partners (husbands) for obstetric emergencies (aOR 3.6; 95% CI 1.0, 12), birth preparedness plan practice (aOR 6.5; 95% CI 2.3, 18.2), complications in previous childbirth (aOR 3; 95% 1.0, 9), history of previous institutional childbirth (aOR 12; 95% CI 3.8, 40), residence in areas within two hours walking distance to the nearest health facility (aOR 3.3; 95% CI: 1.4, 7.7), and ease of access to transport in obstetric emergencies (aOR 8.8; 95% CI: 3.9, 19) were factors that showed significant associations with MWH utilization. Conclusions A low proportion of women has ever used MWHs in the study area. To increase MWH utilization, promoting birth preparedness practices, incorporating MWH as part of a personalized birth plan, improving access to health institutions for women living far away and upgrading existing MWHs are highly recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mekdes Kondale Gurara
- Department of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Arba Minch University, P.O. Box 21, Arba Minch, Ethiopia. .,Global Health Institute, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
| | | | - Befikadu Tariku Gutema
- Department of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Arba Minch University, P.O. Box 21, Arba Minch, Ethiopia
| | - Veerle Draulans
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Centre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Yves Jacquemyn
- Global Health Institute, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kurji J, Gebretsadik LA, Wordofa MA, Morankar S, Bedru KH, Bulcha G, Bergen N, Kiros G, Asefa Y, Asfaw S, Mamo A, Endale E, Thavorn K, Labonte R, Taljaard M, Kulkarni MA. Effectiveness of upgraded maternity waiting homes and local leader training on improving institutional births: a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Jimma, Ethiopia. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:1593. [PMID: 33092565 PMCID: PMC7583173 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09692-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Maternity waiting homes (MWHs), residential spaces for pregnant women close to obstetric care facilities, are being used to tackle physical barriers to access. However, their effectiveness has not been rigorously assessed. The objective of this cluster randomized trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of functional MWHs combined with community mobilization by trained local leaders in improving institutional births in Jimma Zone, Ethiopia. Methods A pragmatic, parallel arm cluster-randomized trial was conducted in three districts. Twenty-four primary health care units (PHCUs) were randomly assigned to either (i) upgraded MWHs combined with local leader training on safe motherhood strategies, (ii) local leader training only, or (iii) usual care. Data were collected using repeat cross-sectional surveys at baseline and 21 months after intervention to assess the effect of intervention on the primary outcome, defined as institutional births, at the individual level. Women who had a pregnancy outcome (livebirth, stillbirth or abortion) 12 months prior to being surveyed were eligible for interview. Random effects logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of the interventions. Results Data from 24 PHCUs and 7593 women were analysed using intention-to-treat. The proportion of institutional births was comparable at baseline between the three arms. At endline, institutional births were slightly higher in the MWH + training (54% [n = 671/1239]) and training only arms (65% [n = 821/1263]) compared to usual care (51% [n = 646/1271]). MWH use at baseline was 6.7% (n = 256/3784) and 5.8% at endline (n = 219/3809). Both intervention groups exhibited a non-statistically significant higher odds of institutional births compared to usual care (MWH+ & leader training odds ratio [OR] = 1.09, 97.5% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 1.75; leader training OR = 1.37, 97.5% CI 0.85 to 2.22). Conclusions Both the combined MWH+ & leader training and the leader training alone intervention led to a small but non-significant increase in institutional births when compared to usual care. Implementation challenges and short intervention duration may have hindered intervention effectiveness. Nevertheless, the observed increases suggest the interventions have potential to improve women’s use of maternal healthcare services. Optimal distances at which MWHs are most beneficial to women need to be investigated. Trial registration The trial was retrospectively registered on the Clinical Trials website (https://clinicaltrials.gov) on 3rd October 2017. The trial identifier is NCT03299491.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaameeta Kurji
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario, K1G 5Z3, Canada.
| | - Lakew Abebe Gebretsadik
- Department of Health, Behaviour & Society, Jimma University, Jimma Town, Jimma Zone, Ethiopia
| | | | - Sudhakar Morankar
- Department of Health, Behaviour & Society, Jimma University, Jimma Town, Jimma Zone, Ethiopia
| | | | | | - Nicole Bergen
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario, K1G 5Z3, Canada
| | - Getachew Kiros
- Department of Health, Behaviour & Society, Jimma University, Jimma Town, Jimma Zone, Ethiopia
| | - Yisalemush Asefa
- Department of Health Economics, Management & Policy, Jimma University, Jimma Town, Jimma Zone, Ethiopia
| | - Shifera Asfaw
- Department of Health, Behaviour & Society, Jimma University, Jimma Town, Jimma Zone, Ethiopia
| | - Abebe Mamo
- Department of Health, Behaviour & Society, Jimma University, Jimma Town, Jimma Zone, Ethiopia
| | - Erko Endale
- Department of Health, Behaviour & Society, Jimma University, Jimma Town, Jimma Zone, Ethiopia
| | - Kednapa Thavorn
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute General Campus, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Ronald Labonte
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario, K1G 5Z3, Canada
| | - Monica Taljaard
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Civic Campus, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Manisha A Kulkarni
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario, K1G 5Z3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Intentions to use maternity waiting homes and associated factors in Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20:281. [PMID: 32393188 PMCID: PMC7216713 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-02982-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Maternity Waiting Homes (MWHs) are residential facilities located within hospitals or health centers to accommodate women in their final weeks of pregnancy to bridge the geographical gap in obstetric care. Little is known, however, about women’s intentions to use MWHs. Thus, this study aimed to assess pregnant women’s intentions to use MWHs and associated factors in East Bellesa district, northwest Ethiopia. Methods A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 525 pregnant women in East Bellesa district from March to May 2018. Study participants were selected using systematic random sampling. Binary logistic regression was used for analysis. Adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI), and p-value < 0.05 were used to identify factors associated with intentions to use MWHs. Results In the study area, 326/499 (65.3%) pregnant women had the intention to use MWHs. Pregnant women who had good knowledge about maternal healthcare and obstetric complications (aOR 6.40; 95% CI 3.6–11.5), positive subjective norms related to women’s perceptions of social pressure (aOR 5.14; 95% CI 2.9–9.2), positive perceived behavioral control of women on the extent to which women feel confident (aOR 4.74; 95% CI 2.7–8.4), rich wealth status (aOR 4.21; 95% CI 2.1–8.4), women who decided by themselves to use maternal services (aOR 2.74; 95% CI 1.2–6.2), attended antenatal care (aOR 2.24; 95% CI 1.2–4.1) and favorable attitudes towards women’s overall evaluation of MWHs (aOR 1.86; 95% CI 1.0–3.4) had higher odds of intentions to use MWHs. Conclusion Two thirds (65.3%) of pregnant women had intentions to use MWHs. Factors such as women’s knowledge, subjective norms related to women’s perceptions of social pressure, perceived behavioral control of women on the extent to which women feel confident to utilize, and wealth status, decision-making power, attending antenatal care and attitude towards women’s overall evaluation of MWHs were significantly associated with the intention to use MWHs. Therefore, improving women’s awareness by providing continuous health education during antenatal care visits, devising strategies to improve women’s wealth status, and strengthening decision-making power may enhance their intention to use MWHs.
Collapse
|
18
|
Bonawitz R, McGlasson KL, Kaiser JL, Ngoma T, Fong RM, Biemba G, Bwalya M, Hamer DH, Scott NA. Quality and utilization patterns of maternity waiting homes at referral facilities in rural Zambia: A mixed-methods multiple case analysis of intervention and standard of care sites. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0225523. [PMID: 31774838 PMCID: PMC6881034 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Maternity waiting homes, defined as residential lodging near a health facility, are recommended by the WHO. An improved MWH model, responsive to community standards for functionality and comfort, was implemented at two purposively selected health facilities in rural Zambia providing comprehensive emergency obstetric and neonatal care (CEmONC) services (intervention MWHs), and compared to three existing standard-of-care MWHs (comparison MWHs) at other CEmONC sites in the same districts. METHODS We used a mixed-methods time-series design for this analysis. Quantitative data including MWH quality, MWH utilization, and demographics of women utilizing MWHs were collected from September 2016 through May 2018 to capture pre-post intervention trends. Qualitative data were obtained from two focus group discussions conducted with pregnant women at intervention MWHs in August 2017 and May 2018. The primary outcomes were quality scoring of the MWHs and maternal utilization of the MWHs. RESULTS MWH quality was similar at all sites during the pre-intervention time period, with a significant change in overall quality scores between intervention (mean score 83.8, SD 12) and comparison (mean score 43.1, SD 10.2) sites after the intervention (p <0.0001). Women utilizing intervention and comparison MWHs at all time points had very similar demographics. After implementation of the intervention, there were marked increases in MWH utilization at both intervention and comparison sites, with a greater percentage increase at one of two intervention sites. CONCLUSIONS An improved MWH model can result in measurably improved quality scores for MWHs, and can result in increased utilization of MWHs at rural CEmONC facilities. MWHs are part of the infrastructure that might be needed for health systems to provide high quality "right place" maternal care in rural settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Bonawitz
- Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Saint Christopher’s Hospital for Children, Philadelphia PA, United States of America
- Department of Pediatrics, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
- * E-mail: , ,
| | - Kathleen L. McGlasson
- Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Jeanette L. Kaiser
- Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Thandiwe Ngoma
- Department of Research, Right to Care Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Rachel M. Fong
- Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Godfrey Biemba
- National Health Research Authority, Pediatric Centre of Excellence, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Misheck Bwalya
- Department of Research, Right to Care Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Davidson H. Hamer
- Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Nancy A. Scott
- Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Getachew B, Liabsuetrakul T, Gebrehiwot Y. Association of maternity waiting home utilization with women's perceived geographic barriers and delivery complications in Ethiopia. Int J Health Plann Manage 2019; 35:e96-e107. [PMID: 31691379 DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study is to identify the influence of perceived geographic barriers to the utilization of maternity waiting homes (MWHs) and to explore factors associated with current delivery complications among MWH users and nonusers. METHODS An observational cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2017 and June 2018 in eight health facilities with MWH in the Gurage zone of Ethiopia. The associated factors were identified by using the combination of a directed acyclic graph (DAG) concept and multiple logistic regression for data analysis. RESULTS A total of 716 women were included in the study, of whom 358 were MWH users. MWH users had lower odds of having delivery complications. Lower odds of delivery complications were found among women who gave birth in non-cesarean section (CS) facilities. Women with pregnancy complications and did not used MWH were more likely to develop delivery complications. Women with delivery complications had higher odds of undergoing cesarean delivery and neonatal death. CONCLUSIONS Geographic barriers influenced the utilization of MWH. The women who used MWH had lower delivery complications. This study strengthens the evidence of MWH utilization as a useful strategy to overcome geographic barriers and lower delivery complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biniam Getachew
- Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand
| | | | - Yirgu Gebrehiwot
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kurji J, Gebretsadik LA, Wordofa MA, Sudhakar M, Asefa Y, Kiros G, Mamo A, Bergen N, Asfaw S, Bedru KH, Bulcha G, Labonte R, Taljaard M, Kulkarni M. Factors associated with maternity waiting home use among women in Jimma Zone, Ethiopia: a multilevel cross-sectional analysis. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e028210. [PMID: 31467047 PMCID: PMC6720516 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify individual-, household- and community-level factors associated with maternity waiting home (MWH) use in Ethiopia. DESIGN Cross-sectional analysis of baseline household survey data from an ongoing cluster-randomised controlled trial using multilevel analyses. SETTING Twenty-four rural primary care facility catchment areas in Jimma Zone, Ethiopia. PARTICIPANTS 3784 women who had a pregnancy outcome (live birth, stillbirth, spontaneous/induced abortion) 12 months prior to September 2016. OUTCOME MEASURE The primary outcome was self-reported MWH use for any pregnancy; hypothesised factors associated with MWH use included woman's education, woman's occupation, household wealth, involvement in health-related decision-making, companion support, travel time to health facility and community-levels of institutional births. RESULTS Overall, 7% of women reported past MWH use. Housewives (OR: 1.74, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.52), women with companions for facility visits (OR: 2.15, 95% CI 1.44 to 3.23), wealthier households (fourth vs first quintile OR: 3.20, 95% CI 1.93 to 5.33) and those with no health facility nearby or living >30 min from a health facility (OR: 2.37, 95% CI 1.80 to 3.13) had significantly higher odds of MWH use. Education, decision-making autonomy and community-level institutional births were not significantly associated with MWH use. CONCLUSIONS Utilisation inequities exist; women with less wealth and companion support experienced more difficulties in accessing MWHs. Short duration of stay and failure to consider MWH as part of birth preparedness planning suggests local referral and promotion practices need investigation to ensure that women who would benefit the most are linked to MWH services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaameeta Kurji
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Morankar Sudhakar
- Department of Health, Behaviour and Society, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
| | - Yisalemush Asefa
- Department of Health Economics, Management and Policy, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
| | - Getachew Kiros
- Department of Health, Behaviour and Society, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
| | - Abebe Mamo
- Department of Health, Behaviour and Society, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
| | - Nicole Bergen
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shifera Asfaw
- Department of Health, Behaviour and Society, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
| | | | | | - Ronald Labonte
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Manisha Kulkarni
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tiruneh GT, Getu YN, Abdukie MA, Eba GG, Keyes E, Bailey PE. Distribution of maternity waiting homes and their correlation with perinatal mortality and direct obstetric complication rates in Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19:214. [PMID: 31238909 PMCID: PMC6593553 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2356-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Ethiopia has been expanding maternity waiting homes to bridge geographical gaps between health facilities and communities in order to improve access to skilled care. In 2015, the Ministry of Health revised its national guidelines to standardize the rapid expansion of waiting homes. Little has been done to document their distribution, service availability and readiness. This paper addresses these gaps as well as their association with perinatal mortality and obstetric complication rates. Methods We utilized data from the 2016 national Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care assessment, a census of 3804 public and private health facilities. Data were collected between May and December 2016 through interviews with health care workers, record reviews, and observation of infrastructure. Descriptive statistics describe the distribution and characteristics of waiting homes and linear regression models examined the correlation between independent variables and institutional perinatal and peripartum outcomes. Results Nationally, about half of facilities had a waiting home. More than two-thirds of facilities in Amhara and half of the facilities in SNNP and Oromia had a home while the region of Gambella had none. Highly urbanized regions had few homes. Conditions were better among homes at hospitals than at health centers. Finished floors, electricity, water, toilets, and beds with mattresses were available at three (or more) out of four hospital homes. Waiting homes in pastoralist regions were often at a disadvantage. Health facilities with waiting homes had similar or lower rates of perinatal death and direct obstetric complication rates than facilities without a home. The perinatal mortality was 47% lower in hospitals with a home than those without. Similarly, the direct obstetric complication rate was 49% lower at hospitals with a home compared to hospitals without. Conclusions The findings should inform regional maternal and newborn improvement strategies, indicating gaps in the distribution and conditions, especially in the pastoralist regions. The impact of waiting homes on maternal and perinatal outcomes appear promising and as homes continue to expand, so should efforts to regularly monitor, refine and document their impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gizachew Tadele Tiruneh
- The Last Ten Kilometers (L10K) Project, JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
| | | | | | | | - Emily Keyes
- FHI 360, 359 Blackwell Street, Suite 200, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Getachew B, Liabsuetrakul T. Health care expenditure for delivery care between maternity waiting home users and nonusers in Ethiopia. Int J Health Plann Manage 2019; 34:e1334-e1345. [PMID: 30924204 DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Revised: 03/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the health care expenditures between maternity waiting home (MWH) users and nonusers in Ethiopia. METHODS A cross-sectional study was done in Ethiopia between December 2017 and June 2018. The study setting included eight health facilities in the Gurage zone of Ethiopia. Health expenditure for delivery care was the outcome variable that was then classified into out-of-pocket (OOP) payments, women's costs, total costs, and overall costs. Those health expenditures were then compared among MWH users and nonusers. OOP payments were further analyzed using quantile regression to explore associated factors. RESULTS A total of 812 postpartum women were included in this study of whom half were MWH users. Significantly higher OOP payment, women's costs, total costs, and overall cost were found among MWH users compared with nonusers regardless of duration of MWH stay. The MWH users were more likely to have higher OOP payment compared with MWH nonusers in linear and quantile regressions for both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Higher OOP payments were observed for longer distance traveled and cesarean section (CS) delivery women at the 75th and 90th quantiles of expenditure. Using public transportation was significantly associated with higher OOP payment in all quantile levels. CONCLUSION Utilization of MWH incurred higher OOP payments, total costs, women's costs, and overall costs compared with MWH nonusers. Higher OOP payments for delivery care among MWH users were observed in all quantiles of expenditure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biniam Getachew
- Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Tippawan Liabsuetrakul
- Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bekele BB, Dadi TL, Tesfaye T. The significant association between maternity waiting homes utilization and perinatal mortality in Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Res Notes 2019; 12:13. [PMID: 30642355 PMCID: PMC6332606 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-019-4056-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A proper uptake of maternity waiting homes (MWHs) is important to improve maternal and child health (MCH). The aim of this review is to generate the best existing evidences concerning the MWHs utilization and its impact on perinatal mortality (PNM) among pregnant mothers in Africa. Both relevant quantitative and qualitative studies, investigated and reported from databases were explored. Meta-analysis of the studies was displayed by tables and forest plots. The Stata version 14 was used with the fixed effect model and 95% confidence interval. RESULTS In this review, a total of 68,805 births were recorded in this review. About 1.6% and 7.2% PNM occurred among non-exposed and exposed mothers respectively. Fifty percent of the studies showed there is a significant association between MWHs use and PNM. Meta-analysis revealed that utilizing MWHs have a significant effect in a reducing PNM by 82.5% (80.4%-84.5%), I2 = 96.5%. Therefore, use of MWHs has a potential to reduce PNM among pregnant mothers. The review revealed that MWHs relevance to achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs) concerning reducing newborn mortality. Therefore, the utilization rate of MWHs must be enhanced to achieve SDGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bayu Begashaw Bekele
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Mizan Tepi University, Mizan Aman Street, 260, Mizan Aman, Ethiopia
| | - Tegene Legese Dadi
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Mizan Tepi University, Mizan Aman Street, 260, Mizan Aman, Ethiopia
| | - Thomas Tesfaye
- Arba Minch College of Health Sciences, Arba Minch, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Singh K, Speizer IS, Kim ET, Lemani C, Tang JH, Phoya A. Evaluation of a maternity waiting home and community education program in two districts of Malawi. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018; 18:457. [PMID: 30470256 PMCID: PMC6251123 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-2084-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The implementation of Maternity Waiting Homes (MWHs) is a strategy to bring vulnerable women close to a health facility towards the end of their pregnancies. To date, while MWHs are a popular strategy, there is limited evidence on the role that MWHs play in reaching women most in need. This paper contributes to this topic by examining whether two program-supported MWHs in Malawi are reaching women in need and if there are changes in women reached over time. METHODS Two rounds of exit interviews (2015 and 2017) were conducted with women within 3 months of delivery and included both MWH users and non-MWH users. These exit interviews included questions on sociodemographic factors, obstetric risk factors and use of health services. Bivariate statistics were used to compare MWH users and non-MWH users at baseline and endline and over time. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine what factors were associated with MWH use, and Poisson regression was used to study factors associated with HIV knowledge. Descriptive data from discharge surveys were used to examine satisfaction with the MWH structure and environment over time. RESULTS Primiparous women were more likely to use a MWH compared to women of parity 2 (p < 0.05). Women who were told they were at risk of a complication were more likely to use a MWH compared to those who were not told they were at risk (p < 0.05). There were also significant findings for wealth and time to a facility, with poorer women and those who lived further from a facility being more likely to use a MWH. Attendance at a community event was associated with greater knowledge of HIV (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS MWHs have a role to play in efforts to improve maternal health and reduce maternal mortality. Education provided within the MWHs and through community outreach can improve knowledge of important health topics. Malawi and other low and middle income countries must ensure that health facilities affiliated with the MWHs offer high quality services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kavita Singh
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Ilene S. Speizer
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Eunsoo Timothy Kim
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Clara Lemani
- UNC Project-Malawi, c/o Kamuzu Central Hospital, 100 Mzimba Road, Private Bag, A-104 Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Jennifer H. Tang
- UNC Project-Malawi, c/o Kamuzu Central Hospital, 100 Mzimba Road, Private Bag, A-104 Lilongwe, Malawi
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Ann Phoya
- UNC Project-Malawi, c/o Kamuzu Central Hospital, 100 Mzimba Road, Private Bag, A-104 Lilongwe, Malawi
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kebede AS, Muche AA, Alene AG. Factors associated with adverse pregnancy outcome in Debre Tabor town, Northwest Ethiopia: a case control study. BMC Res Notes 2018; 11:820. [PMID: 30454020 PMCID: PMC6245821 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-3932-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2018] [Accepted: 11/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to assess the socioeconomic and demographic factors on adverse pregnancy outcomes. Result The mean age of cases was 42.2 (± 13.26) years and the mean age of controls was 34.5 (± 12.23) years. Advanced maternal age, low educational status, and early sexual debut showed a significant association with an adverse pregnancy outcome. Mothers in the age group 35–44 years, AOR 2.54 (95% CI 1.27, 5.06), 35–44 years, AOR 2.79 (95% CI 1.27, 6.16) and Mothers with age 55 years and above AOR 4.18 (95% CI 1.73, 9.13) were more likely to have an adverse pregnancy outcome compared to mothers in the age group ≤ 24 years. The low educational status was also found to have an implication on adverse pregnancy outcome. Those mothers with no formal education were two times more likely to develop adverse pregnancy outcome AOR 2.15 (95% CI 1.41, 2.81) and those in primary education AOR 1.6 (95% CI 1.06, 4.6) times more likely compared to those in higher education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abraham Sahilemichael Kebede
- Pan Africa University Life and Earth Sciences Institute (PAULESI), University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. .,1000 Days Plus Project, Department of Reproductive and Health Service Management, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
| | - Achenef Asmamaw Muche
- Pan Africa University Life and Earth Sciences Institute (PAULESI), University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Amelework Getinet Alene
- Pan Africa University Life and Earth Sciences Institute (PAULESI), University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.,Amhara Public Health Institute, Public Health Emergency Management Directorate, Bahirdar, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Vermeiden T, Schiffer R, Langhorst J, Klappe N, Asera W, Getnet G, Stekelenburg J, van den Akker T. Facilitators for maternity waiting home utilisation at Attat Hospital: a mixed-methods study based on 45 years of experience. Trop Med Int Health 2018; 23:1332-1341. [PMID: 30286267 DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe facilitators for maternity waiting home (MWH) utilisation from the perspectives of MWH users and health staff. METHODS Data collection took place over several time frames between March 2014 and January 2018 at Attat Hospital in Ethiopia, using a mixed-methods design. This included seven in-depth interviews with staff and users, three focus group discussions with 28 users and attendants, a structured questionnaire among 244 users, a 2-week observation period and review of annual facility reports. The MWH was built in 1973; consistent records were kept from 1987. Data analysis was done through content analysis, descriptive statistics and data triangulation. RESULTS The MWH at Attat Hospital has become a well-established intervention for high-risk pregnant women (1987-2017: from 142 users of 777 total attended births [18.3%] to 571 of 3693 [15.5%]; range 142-832 users). From 2008, utilisation stabilised at on average 662 women annually. Between 2014 and 2017, total attended births doubled following government promotion of facility births; MWH utilisation stayed approximately the same. Perceived high quality of care at the health facility was expressed by users to be an important reason for MWH utilisation (114 of 128 MWH users who had previous experience with maternity services at Attat Hospital rated overall services as good). A strong community public health programme and continuous provision of comprehensive emergency obstetric and neonatal care (EmONC) seemed to have contributed to realising community support for the MWH. The qualitative data also revealed that awareness of pregnancy-related complications and supportive husbands (203 of 244 supported the MWH stay financially) were key facilitators. Barriers to utilisation existed (no cooking utensils at the MWH [198/244]; attendant being away from work [190/244]), but users considered these necessary to overcome for the perceived benefit: a healthy mother and baby. CONCLUSIONS Facilitators for MWH utilisation according to users and staff were perceived high-quality EmONC, integrated health services, awareness of pregnancy-related complications and the husband's support in overcoming barriers. If providing high-quality EmONC and integrating health services are prioritised, MWHs have the potential to become an accepted intervention in (rural) communities. Only then can MWHs improve access to EmONC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tienke Vermeiden
- Butajira General Hospital, Butajira, Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples' Region, Ethiopia.,Department of Health Sciences, Global Health, University Medical Centre/University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Rita Schiffer
- Attat Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic Primary Hospital, Welkite, Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples' Region, Ethiopia
| | - Jorine Langhorst
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University Medical Centre/University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Neel Klappe
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University Medical Centre/University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Wolde Asera
- Attat Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic Primary Hospital, Welkite, Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples' Region, Ethiopia
| | - Gashaw Getnet
- Butajira General Hospital, Butajira, Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples' Region, Ethiopia
| | - Jelle Stekelenburg
- Department of Health Sciences, Global Health, University Medical Centre/University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeuwarden Medical Centre, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas van den Akker
- Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|