Guatemala City youth: an analysis of health indicators through the lens of a clinical registry

Mental Health, Quality of Life and Violence Exposure in Low-Socioeconomic Status Children and Adolescents of Guatemala

Growing up in vulnerable conditions has an impact on children and adolescents’ mental health and well-being outcomes. However, this evidence has rarely been obtained in middle and low-income countries like Guatemala, where food insecurity and exposure to violence frequently threaten childhood development. The aim of this study was to analyse the relations that sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors have with psychological adjustment of low-socioeconomic status (SES) Guatemalan children and adolescents, and how these relations were mediated by food insecurity and exposure to violence. A total of 185 participants (50.8% girls; aged between 6 to 17, M = 11.82, SD = 3.7) from three vulnerable schools located in rural and urban areas of Guatemala were assessed. The results indicated that exposure to violence significantly moderates the effect of sociodemographic and socioeconomic variables in measures of depression, anxiety and health-related quality of life. Adolescents more exposed to violence reported higher levels of depression and anxiety, as well as lower levels of health-related quality of life. In contrast, food insecurity did not seem to influence psychological adjustment outcomes in this low-SES sample. These findings highlight the relevance of exposure to violence for mental health and well-being, and is a factor that should be considered when designing public health policies to promote children and adolescents’ welfare.

Perspectives on the use of a health surveillance system for Guatemalan youth: a stakeholder analysis

In Guatemala, adolescent health indicators are collected using the Sistema Informático del Adolescente (SIA), a clinical survey developed by the Pan-American Health Organization. Recent analysis revealed significant gaps in data, limiting the ability of clinicians and policy makers to effectively address health disparities. Our objective was to explore adolescent health stakeholders' perceptions of the SIA. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 clinic personnel recruited from six adolescent health clinics throughout Guatemala. Stakeholders included multi-disciplinary providers and key database personnel. Interviews were conducted in Spanish, recorded and transcribed; a coding scheme was developed using a phenomenological approach, and Dedoose was used for analysis. Four major themes emerged: (1) Collecting baseline adolescent health data was useful for prevention, diagnosis and treatment of adolescent health issues. (2) The SIA was instrumental in streamlining clinical care and informing the psychosocial needs of patients. (3) The questionnaire was time-intensive, repetitive and often problematic for data input/extraction. (4) Condensing the survey and using a web-based version may improve the system for future use. Our findings show that despite the use of a standardized system, multiple barriers contribute to gaps in comprehensive data collection in Guatemala. Refining the system may enhance adolescent health surveillance and improve quality of care in this vulnerable population.