1
|
Study Management Group, Varghese C, McGuinness M, Wells CI, Elliott BM, Gunawardene A, Edwards M, Expert Advisory Group, Vohra R, Griffiths EA, Connor S, Poole GH, Windsor JA, Wright D, Harmston C, Collaborating Authors, Wang JHS, Windsor J, Chen E, Ghate K, Lal S, Lekamalage B, Ratnayake M, Bansal A, Windsor J, von Keisenberg S, Hemachandran A, Singhal M, Joseph N, Bhat S, Rossaak J, Carson D, Dubey N, Pan M, Ferguson L, Watt I, Choi J, Mclauchlan J, Connor S, Nicholas E, Al-Busaidi I, Wood D, Haran C, Lin A, Fagan P, Bathgate A, Patel S, Mak J, Espiner E, Poole G, Hassan S, Javed Z, Randall M, Clough S, Cook W, Clark S, Finlayson C, Poole G, Bahl P, Singh S, Lin C, Wang C, Kittaka R, Morreau M, Ing A, Logan S, Guest S, Sutherland K, Lewis A, Roberts J, Watson B, Tietjens J, Teague R, Su'a B, Modi A, Modi V, Williams Y, Morreau J, Khoo C, Desmond B, Young M, Christmas R, Holm T, Harmston C, Long K, Garton B, Niki kau, Barber L, Amer M, Haddow J, Amer M, Fearnley-Fitzgerald C, Suresh K, Zeng E, Young-Gough A, Skeet J, El-Haddawi F, Alvarez M, Nguyen S, King J, Crichton J, Welsh F, Edwards M, Tan J, Luo J, Banker K, Field X, Allan P, Rennie S, Ratnayake CB, Srinivasa S, Gloria Kim JH, Bradley S, Singh N, Kang G, Xu W, Srinivasa S, Cook H, Mistry V, Dabla K, de Oca AM, Yoganandarajah V, Lill M, Lu J, Bonnet LA, Uiyapat T. Variation in the practice of cholecystectomy for benign biliary disease in Aotearoa New Zealand: a population-based cohort study. HPB (Oxford) 2023:S1365-182X(23)00128-4. [PMID: 37198069 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cholecystectomy for benign biliary disease is common and its delivery should be standardised. However, the current practice of cholecystectomy in Aotearoa New Zealand is unknown. METHODS A prospective, national cohort study of consecutive patients having cholecystectomy for benign biliary disease was performed between August and October 2021 with 30-day follow-up, through STRATA, a student- and trainee-led collaborative. RESULTS Data were collected for 1171 patients from 16 centres. 651 (55.6%) had an acute operation at index admission, 304 (26.0%) had delayed cholecystectomy following a previous admission, and 216 (18.4%) had an elective operation with no preceding acute admissions. The median adjusted rate of index cholecystectomy (as a proportion of index and delayed cholecystectomy) was 71.9% (range 27.2%-87.3%). The median adjusted rate of elective cholecystectomy (as proportion of all cholecystectomies) was 20.8% (range 6.7%-35.4%). Variations across centres were significant (p < 0.001) and inadequately explained by patient, operative, or hospital-factors (index cholecystectomy model R2 = 25.8, elective cholecystectomy model R2 = 50.6). CONCLUSIONS Notable variation in the rates of index and elective cholecystectomy exists in Aotearoa New Zealand not attributable to patient, operative or hospital factors alone. National quality improvement efforts to standardise availability of cholecystectomy are needed.
Collapse
|
2
|
Thapar VB, Thapar PM, Goel R, Agarwalla R, Salvi PH, Nasta AM, Mahawar K, Karthik A, Lakshman A, Amit A, Rishabh A, Manas A, Anmol A, Varadaraj AK, Murtaza A, Temsula A, Reddy AD, Srinivas A, Rambabu B, Rajendra B, Sarfaraz B, Manish B, Lovenish B, Lal BB, Rajandeep B, Rajesh B, Sharath B, Somendra B, Akshay B, Sonali B, Bhavneet B, Jatin B, Siddhartha B, Rajesh B, Bisht SD, Arjun B, Pankaj B, Vijay B, Prashanta B, Chandra BR, Chitra C, Kanhaiyya C, Sakthivel C, Bitan C, Shamita C, Tamonas C, Madeswaran CVC, Shreya C, Aditya C, Sourav C, Supriya C, Pradeep C, H CA, Ashwani D, Usha D, Abhay D, Chitta D, Ram DG, kumar DJ, Arupabha D, Rupjyoti D, Kunal D, Ashish D, Sumanta D, Monika D, Nilesh D, Poornima DB, Sanjay D, Easwaramoorthy S, Nishith E, Reddy EV, Naima G, Amitabh G, Apoorv G, Deep G, Thakut G, Pankaj G, Achal G, Rajkumar G, Rahul G, Shalu G, Shardool G, Lokesh HM, Nisar H, Sarath H, Bhaskar H, Vikas H, Srikantaiah H, Hariharasaran I, Mohammad I, Chaidul I, Samsul I, Mohammed I, Amit J, Mohit J, Parakash J, Sumita J, Advait J, Nikita J, Samrat J, James J, Yashpaul J, Abhijit J, Praveen J, Rejana J, Pooja K, Prasad K, Anirudhan K, Vishakha K, Adityakalyan K, Manmohan K, Abhimanyu K, Mayank K, Rohan K, Jaspreet K, Hosni K, Archana K, Ajay K, Khandelwal RG, Subhash K, Shashi K, Elbert K, Rajesh K, Suhail K, Shashank K, Uttam K, Shyam K, Prakash KC, Jyotsna K, Anil K, Bhartendu K, Durgesh K, Jitendra K, Shashidhar K, Saurabh K, Kshitiz K, Puneet K, Ranjith K, Hampher K, Krishnaswamy L, Suchitra L, Kona L, Nishanth L, Pawan L, Samuel L, Alfred L, Manjusha L, Lancelot L, Sushil L, Temsutoshi L, MuniReddy M, Vijaykumar M, Sivakumar M, Deepak M, Singh MM, Prasad MBV, Kumar MN, Suman M, Parth M, Shresth M, Faiz M, Alok M, Noushif M, Sadananda M, Magan M, Diksha M, Senthil M, Prakash MG, Lalan M, Subhash M, Taher M, Tarun M, kushal M, Rajan M, Abhiram M, Erbaz M, Rajashekar M, Ramya M, Khalid M, Sheetal AM, Majid M, Dileep N, Nikhil N, Ramprasanna NN, Madhavi N, Anand N, Govind N, Kumar NB, Barun N, Darshan N, Manjunath N, Rohit N, Ashok NO, Prabha O, Aashutosh P, Niranjan P, Hirak P, Chirag P, Roy P, Rakeshkumar P, Danesh P, Deepak P, Tejas P, Tanmaye P, Soumen P, Pratik P, Anshuman P, Pankaj P, Anand P, Arun P, Pallawi P, Gaurav P, Puneet P, Durai R, Santhosh R, Prashant R, Mohsinur R, Mahesh R, Ramesh BS, Gordon R, Prashanth R, Arshad R, Sandip R, Udipta R, Sameer R, Shyam R, Rajendar R, Anand S, ArunKumar S, DineshKumar S, Viswanath S, Amit S, Sajeesh S, Vishal S, Anurag S, Sauradeep S, Ankush S, Snehasish S, Harsh S, Shrenik S, Anil S, Abadhesh S, Meenakshi S, Varsha S, Nikhil S, Harsh S, Pravin S, Vikram SS, Ankur S, Pranav S, Arvind S, Abhishek S, Abhiyutthan S, Chandrapal S, Charan S, Gurbhaij S, Gurbachan S, Saurav S, Harmanmeet S, Pal SS, Kumar SN, Aalok S, Vandana S, Sanjai S, Sushama S, Pravin S, Om T, Fahad T, Ashwin T, Anuroop T, Abhishek T, K TS, Pradeep T, Lohith U, Peeyush V, Ashish V, Ravindra V, Kumar VR, Arunima V, Soumil V, Ajaz W, Sachin W, Amit Y, Kumar YA, Raghu Y, Mohammed Y. Evaluation of 30-day morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter prospective observational Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (IAGES) Study. Surg Endosc 2022; 37:2611-2625. [PMID: 36357547 PMCID: PMC9648883 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09659-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard of care for benign gallstone disease. There are no robust Indian data on the 30-day morbidity and mortality of this procedure. A prospective multicentre observational study was conducted by the Indian Association of Gastro-Intestinal Endo Surgeons (IAGES) to assess the 30-day morbidity and mortality of LC in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participating surgeons were invited to submit data on all consecutive LCs for benign diseases performed between 09/12/2020 and 08/03/2021 in adults. Primary outcome measures were 30-day morbidity and mortality. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables significantly associated with primary outcomes. RESULTS A total of 293 surgeons from 125 centres submitted data on 6666 patients. Of these, 71.7% (n = 4780) were elective. A total LC was carried out in 95% (n = 6331). Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy was performed in 1.9% (n = 126) and the procedure were converted to open in 1.4% of patients. Bile duct injury was seen in 0.3% (n = 20). Overall, 30-day morbidity and mortality were 11.1% (n = 743) and 0.2% (n = 14), respectively. Nature of practice, ischemic heart disease, emergency surgery, postoperative intensive care, and postoperative hospital stay were independently associated with 30-day mortality. Age, weight, body mass index, duration of symptoms, nature of the practice, history of Coronavirus Disease-2019, previous major abdominal surgery, acute cholecystitis, use of electrosurgical or ultrasonic or bipolar energy for cystic artery control; use of polymer clips for cystic duct control; conversion to open surgery, subtotal cholecystectomy, simultaneous common bile duct exploration, mucocele, gangrenous gall bladder, dense adhesions, intraoperative cholangiogram, and use of drain were independently associated with 30-day morbidity. CONCLUSION LC has 30-day morbidity of 11.1%, 30-day mortality of 0.2%, conversion to open rate of 1.4%, and bile duct injury rate of 0.3% in India.
Collapse
|
3
|
Boyd K, Bradley NA, Cannings E, Shearer C, Wadhawan H, Wilson MSJ, Crumley A. Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy; change in practice over a 10-year period. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:759-763. [PMID: 34776369 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy is a recognised safe, alternative strategy when a critical view of safety cannot be obtained. This study audits the change in practice at a District General Hospital following the adoption of subtotal cholecystectomy in 2013. METHODS Retrospective case series included consecutive cholecystectomies over a ten-year period in a single institution. Cases were divided into subgroups based on operation date. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients undergoing laparoscopic total cholecystectomy, laparoscopic subtotal and laparoscopic converted to open cholecystectomy. Secondary outcomes included incidence of bile leak, complication rate, return to theatre, and length of stay. RESULTS There were 4217 cases: 1381 in Group A (pre-adoption of subtotal cholecystectomy 2009-2012), and 2836 in Group B (post-adoption of subtotal cholecystectomy 2013-2019). The rate of laparoscopic total cholecystectomy was higher in Group A than Group B (95.4% vs. 92.8%, p < 0.001). In the subtotal group (n = 114, 14 (12.3%) patients had bile leak, 6 (5.3%) underwent re-laparoscopy, and median length of stay was 2 days. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy appears to be an acceptable alternative technique at this centre, reducing the rate of open conversion and length of stay, with a low reintervention rate for bile leak.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten Boyd
- Department of General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, UK.
| | | | | | | | - Himanshu Wadhawan
- Department of General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, UK
| | | | - Andrew Crumley
- Department of General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
de'Angelis N, Catena F, Memeo R, Coccolini F, Martínez-Pérez A, Romeo OM, De Simone B, Di Saverio S, Brustia R, Rhaiem R, Piardi T, Conticchio M, Marchegiani F, Beghdadi N, Abu-Zidan FM, Alikhanov R, Allard MA, Allievi N, Amaddeo G, Ansaloni L, Andersson R, Andolfi E, Azfar M, Bala M, Benkabbou A, Ben-Ishay O, Bianchi G, Biffl WL, Brunetti F, Carra MC, Casanova D, Celentano V, Ceresoli M, Chiara O, Cimbanassi S, Bini R, Coimbra R, Luigi de'Angelis G, Decembrino F, De Palma A, de Reuver PR, Domingo C, Cotsoglou C, Ferrero A, Fraga GP, Gaiani F, Gheza F, Gurrado A, Harrison E, Henriquez A, Hofmeyr S, Iadarola R, Kashuk JL, Kianmanesh R, Kirkpatrick AW, Kluger Y, Landi F, Langella S, Lapointe R, Le Roy B, Luciani A, Machado F, Maggi U, Maier RV, Mefire AC, Hiramatsu K, Ordoñez C, Patrizi F, Planells M, Peitzman AB, Pekolj J, Perdigao F, Pereira BM, Pessaux P, Pisano M, Puyana JC, Rizoli S, Portigliotti L, Romito R, Sakakushev B, Sanei B, Scatton O, Serradilla-Martin M, Schneck AS, Sissoko ML, Sobhani I, Ten Broek RP, Testini M, Valinas R, Veloudis G, Vitali GC, Weber D, Zorcolo L, Giuliante F, Gavriilidis P, Fuks D, Sommacale D. 2020 WSES guidelines for the detection and management of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. World J Emerg Surg 2021; 16:30. [PMID: 34112197 PMCID: PMC8190978 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-021-00369-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Bile duct injury (BDI) is a dangerous complication of cholecystectomy, with significant postoperative sequelae for the patient in terms of morbidity, mortality, and long-term quality of life. BDIs have an estimated incidence of 0.4-1.5%, but considering the number of cholecystectomies performed worldwide, mostly by laparoscopy, surgeons must be prepared to manage this surgical challenge. Most BDIs are recognized either during the procedure or in the immediate postoperative period. However, some BDIs may be discovered later during the postoperative period, and this may translate to delayed or inappropriate treatments. Providing a specific diagnosis and a precise description of the BDI will expedite the decision-making process and increase the chance of treatment success. Subsequently, the choice and timing of the appropriate reconstructive strategy have a critical role in long-term prognosis. Currently, a wide spectrum of multidisciplinary interventions with different degrees of invasiveness is indicated for BDI management. These World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) guidelines have been produced following an exhaustive review of the current literature and an international expert panel discussion with the aim of providing evidence-based recommendations to facilitate and standardize the detection and management of BDIs during cholecystectomy. In particular, the 2020 WSES guidelines cover the following key aspects: (1) strategies to minimize the risk of BDI during cholecystectomy; (2) BDI rates in general surgery units and review of surgical practice; (3) how to classify, stage, and report BDI once detected; (4) how to manage an intraoperatively detected BDI; (5) indications for antibiotic treatment; (6) indications for clinical, biochemical, and imaging investigations for suspected BDI; and (7) how to manage a postoperatively detected BDI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola de'Angelis
- Unit of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Digestive Surgery, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli", Strada Prov. 127 Acquaviva - Santeramo Km. 4, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti BA, Bari, Italy. .,Unit of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, CARE Department, Henri Mondor University Hospital (AP-HP), and Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Creteil, France.
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery of the University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli", Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Aleix Martínez-Pérez
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | - Oreste M Romeo
- Trauma, Burn, and Surgical Care Program, Bronson Methodist Hospital, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Service de Chirurgie Générale, Digestive, et Métabolique, Centre hospitalier de Poissy/Saint Germain en Laye, Saint Germain en Laye, France
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Raffaele Brustia
- Unit of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, CARE Department, Henri Mondor University Hospital (AP-HP), and Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Creteil, France
| | - Rami Rhaiem
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncologic Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Tullio Piardi
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncologic Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France.,Department of Surgery, HPB Unit, Troyes Hospital, Troyes, France
| | - Maria Conticchio
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli", Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Marchegiani
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Nassiba Beghdadi
- Unit of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, CARE Department, Henri Mondor University Hospital (AP-HP), and Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Creteil, France
| | - Fikri M Abu-Zidan
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Ruslan Alikhanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Shosse Enthusiastov, 86, 111123, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Niccolò Allievi
- 1st Surgical Unit, Department of Emergency, Papa Giovanni Hospital XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Giuliana Amaddeo
- Service d'Hepatologie, APHP, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Creteil, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Creteil, France
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- General Surgery, San Matteo University Hospital, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Enrico Andolfi
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, San Donato Hospital, 52100, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Mohammad Azfar
- Department of Surgery, Al Rahba Hospital, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Miklosh Bala
- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Unit, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Amine Benkabbou
- Surgical Oncology Department, National Institute of Oncology, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Offir Ben-Ishay
- Department of General Surgery, Rambam Healthcare Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Giorgio Bianchi
- Unit of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Digestive Surgery, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli", Strada Prov. 127 Acquaviva - Santeramo Km. 4, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti BA, Bari, Italy
| | - Walter L Biffl
- Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Francesco Brunetti
- Unit of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, CARE Department, Henri Mondor University Hospital (AP-HP), and Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Creteil, France
| | | | - Daniel Casanova
- Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - Valerio Celentano
- Colorectal Unit, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Marco Ceresoli
- Emergency and General Surgery Department, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Osvaldo Chiara
- General Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST Niguarda Milano, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Cimbanassi
- General Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST Niguarda Milano, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Bini
- General Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST Niguarda Milano, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Raul Coimbra
- Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Comparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center - CECORC and Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, USA
| | - Gian Luigi de'Angelis
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Francesco Decembrino
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli", Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Andrea De Palma
- General, Emergency and Trauma Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Philip R de Reuver
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Carlos Domingo
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano "Umberto I", Turin, Italy
| | - Gustavo P Fraga
- Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Federica Gaiani
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Federico Gheza
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Angela Gurrado
- Unit of General Surgery "V. Bonomo", Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Ewen Harrison
- Department of Clinical Surgery and Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Stefan Hofmeyr
- Division of Surgery, Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Tygerberg Academic Hospital, University of Stellenbosch Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Roberta Iadarola
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery of the University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Jeffry L Kashuk
- Department of Surgery, Tel Aviv University, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Reza Kianmanesh
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncologic Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Andrew W Kirkpatrick
- Department of Surgery, Critical Care Medicine and the Regional Trauma Service, Foothills Medical Center, Calgari, Alberta, Canada
| | - Yoram Kluger
- Department of General Surgery, Rambam Healthcare Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Filippo Landi
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Hospital Clínic, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Serena Langella
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano "Umberto I", Turin, Italy
| | - Real Lapointe
- Department of HBP Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Bertrand Le Roy
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Alain Luciani
- Unit of Radiology, Henri Mondor University Hospital (AP-HP), Creteil, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Creteil, France
| | - Fernando Machado
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Hospital de Clínicas, School of Medicine UDELAR, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Umberto Maggi
- General Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca'Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ronald V Maier
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Alain Chichom Mefire
- Department of Surgery and Obstetrics/Gynecologic, Regional Hospital, Limbe, Cameroon
| | - Kazuhiro Hiramatsu
- Department of General Surgery, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, Toyohashi, Aichi, Japan
| | - Carlos Ordoñez
- Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Fundacion Valle del Lili, Universidad del Valle Cali, Cali, Colombia
| | - Franca Patrizi
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Manuel Planells
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | - Andrew B Peitzman
- Department of Surgery, UPMC, University of Pittsburg, School of Medicine, Pittsburg, USA
| | - Juan Pekolj
- General Surgery, Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Fabiano Perdigao
- Liver Transplant Unit, APHP, Unité de Chirurgie Hépatobiliaire et Transplantation hépatique, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Bruno M Pereira
- Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Visceral and Digestive Surgery, IHU mix-surg, Institute for Minimally Invasive Image-Guided Surgery, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Michele Pisano
- 1st Surgical Unit, Department of Emergency, Papa Giovanni Hospital XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Juan Carlos Puyana
- Trauma & Acute Care Surgery - Global Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Sandro Rizoli
- Trauma and Acute Care Service, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Luca Portigliotti
- Chirurgia Epato-Gastro-Pancreatica, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Raffaele Romito
- Chirurgia Epato-Gastro-Pancreatica, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Boris Sakakushev
- General Surgery Department, Medical University, University Hospital St George, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Behnam Sanei
- Department of Surgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Liver Transplant Unit, APHP, Unité de Chirurgie Hépatobiliaire et Transplantation hépatique, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Mario Serradilla-Martin
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón, Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Anne-Sophie Schneck
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Guadeloupe, Pointe-À-Pitre, Les Avymes, Guadeloupe, France
| | - Mohammed Lamine Sissoko
- Service de Chirurgie, Hôpital National Blaise Compaoré de Ouagadougou, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Iradj Sobhani
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Creteil, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Creteil, France
| | - Richard P Ten Broek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mario Testini
- Unit of General Surgery "V. Bonomo", Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Roberto Valinas
- Department of Surgery "F", Faculty of Medicine, Clinic Hospital "Dr. Manuel Quintela", Montevideo, Uruguay
| | | | - Giulio Cesare Vitali
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Dieter Weber
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Luigi Zorcolo
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Unit, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Paschalis Gavriilidis
- Division of Gastrointestinal and HBP Surgery, Imperial College HealthCare, NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - David Fuks
- Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Daniele Sommacale
- Unit of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, CARE Department, Henri Mondor University Hospital (AP-HP), and Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Creteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Quality performance indicators for hepato-pancreatico-biliary procedures: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1-10. [PMID: 33158749 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Revised: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review was undertaken to define and summarize existing, proposed quality performance indicators (QPI) for hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) procedures. METHODS A systematic literature review identified studies reporting on quality indicators for cholecystectomy, hepatectomy, pancreatectomy and complex biliary surgical procedures. The databases searched were MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and SCOPUS, with all literature available until the search date of 1 May 2020 included. The reference lists of all included papers, as well as related review articles, were manually searched to identify further relevant studies. RESULTS Forty-five publications report quality indicators for pancreatectomy (n = 22), hepatectomy (n = 7), HPB resections in general (n = 12), and cholecystectomy (n = 6). No publications proposed QPI for complex biliary surgery. The 45 papers used national audit (n = 18), consensus methodology (n = 5), state-wide audit (n = 3), unit audit (n = 9), review methodology (n = 9), and survey methodology (n = 1). Sixty-one QPI were reported for pancreatectomy, 22 reported for hepatectomy, and 14 reported for HPB resections in general, in domains of infrastructure, provider, and documentation. Fourteen infrastructure and provider-based QPI were reported for cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS There are few internationally agreed QPI for HPB procedures that allow global comparison of provider performance and that set aspirational goals for patient care and experience.
Collapse
|
6
|
Bamber JR, Stephens TJ, Cromwell DA, Duncan E, Martin GP, Quiney NF, Abercrombie JF, Beckingham IJ. Effectiveness of a quality improvement collaborative in reducing time to surgery for patients requiring emergency cholecystectomy. BJS Open 2019; 3:802-811. [PMID: 31832587 PMCID: PMC6887703 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 08/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Acute gallstone disease is a high-volume emergency general surgery presentation with wide variations in the quality of care provided across the UK. This controlled cohort evaluation assessed whether participation in a quality improvement collaborative approach reduced time to surgery for patients with acute gallstone disease to fewer than 8 days from presentation, in line with national guidance. Methods Patients admitted to hospital with acute biliary conditions in England and Wales between 1 April 2014 and 31 December 2017 were identified from Hospital Episode Statistics data. Time series of quarterly activity were produced for the Cholecystectomy Quality Improvement Collaborative (Chole-QuIC) and all other acute National Health Service hospitals (control group). A negative binomial regression model was used to compare the proportion of patients having surgery within 8 days in the baseline and intervention periods. Results Of 13 sites invited to join Chole-QuIC, 12 participated throughout the collaborative, which ran from October 2016 to January 2018. Of 7944 admissions, 1160 patients had a cholecystectomy within 8 days of admission, a significant improvement (P < 0·050) from baseline performance. This represented a relative change of 1·56 (95 per cent c.i. 1·38 to 1·75), compared with 1·08 for the control group. At the individual site level, eight of the 12 Chole-QuIC sites showed a significant improvement (P < 0·050), with four sites increasing their 8-day surgery rate to over 20 per cent of all emergency admissions, well above the mean of 15·3 per cent for control hospitals. Conclusion A surgeon-led quality improvement collaborative approach improved care for patients requiring emergency cholecystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. R. Bamber
- Practicality ConsultingQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| | - T. J. Stephens
- William Harvey Research InstituteQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| | - D. A. Cromwell
- Department of Health Services Research and PolicyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK
| | - E. Duncan
- Department of Professional StandardsRoyal College of Surgeons of EnglandLondonUK
| | - G. P. Martin
- The Healthcare Improvement Studies (THIS) InstituteUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - N. F. Quiney
- Department of AnaesthesiaRoyal Surrey County HospitalGuildfordUK
| | | | - I. J. Beckingham
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic SurgeryQueen's Medical CentreNottinghamUK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Surgical management of acute cholecystitis in a nationwide Danish cohort. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2019; 404:589-597. [DOI: 10.1007/s00423-019-01802-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
8
|
Mak MHW, Chew WL, Junnarkar SP, Woon WWL, Low JK, Huey TCW, Shelat VG. Patient reported outcomes in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2019; 23:20-33. [PMID: 30863804 PMCID: PMC6405362 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.2019.23.1.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2018] [Revised: 09/21/2018] [Accepted: 09/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims Traditional outcome measures (e.g., length of hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality) are used to determine the quality of care, but these may not be most important to patients. It is unclear which outcomes matter to patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC). We aim to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) which patients undergoing ELC valued most. Methods A 45-item questionnaire with Four-point Likert-type questions developed from prior literature review, prospectively administered to patients treated with ELC at a tertiary institution in Singapore. Results Seventy-five patients participated. Most essential factors were technical skill and experience level of a surgeon, long-term quality of life (QoL), patient involvement in decision-making, communication skill of a surgeon, cleanliness of the ward environment, and standards of nursing care. Least important factors were hospitalization leave duration, length of hospital stay, a family's opinion of the hospital, and scar cosmesis. Employed patients were more likely to find hospitalization leave duration (p<0.001) and procedure duration (p=0.042) important. Younger patients (p=0.048) and female gender (p=0.003) were more likely to perceive scar cosmesis as important. Conclusions Patients undergoing ELC value long-term QoL, surgeon technical skill and experience level, patient involvement in decision-making, surgeon communication skill, cleanliness of the ward environment, and nursing care standards. Day-case surgery, medical leave, family opinion of hospital, and scar cosmesis were least important. Understanding what patients value will help guide patient-centric healthcare delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malcolm H W Mak
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Woon Ling Chew
- School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | | | - Winston W L Woon
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Jee-Keem Low
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Terence C W Huey
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
de Luca U, Mangia G, Tesoro S, Martino A, Sammartino M, Calisti A. Guidelines on pediatric day surgery of the Italian Societies of Pediatric Surgery (SICP) and Pediatric Anesthesiology (SARNePI). Ital J Pediatr 2018. [PMID: 29530049 PMCID: PMC5848546 DOI: 10.1186/s13052-018-0473-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The Italian Society of Pediatric Surgery (SICP) together with The Italian Society of Pediatric Anesthesia (SARNePI) through a systematic analysis of the scientific literature, followed by a consensus conference held in Perugia on 2015, have produced some evidence based guidelines on the feasibility of day surgery in relation to different pediatric surgical procedures. The main aspects of the pre-operative assessment, appropriacy of operations and discharge are reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugo de Luca
- Day Surgery Unit, Santobono-Pausilipon Pediatric Hospital, Napoli, Italy.
| | - Giovanni Mangia
- Department of Anesthesiology, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Roma, Italy
| | - Simonetta Tesoro
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perugia University, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Maria Sammartino
- Department of Anesthesiology, Policlinico A. Gemelli, Roma, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nimptsch U, Mansk T. Deaths Following Cholecystectomy and Herniotomy: An Analysis of Nationwide German Hospital Discharge Data From 2009 to 2013. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2016; 112:535-43. [PMID: 26334981 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2014] [Revised: 04/29/2015] [Accepted: 04/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2010, 158 000 cholecystectomies and 207 000 herniotomies (without bowel surgery) were performed in Germany as inpatient procedures, generally on a routine, elective basis. Deaths following such operations are rare events. We studied the potential association of death after cholecystectomy or herniotomy with risk factors that could have been detected beforehand, and we examined the types of complications that were documented in these cases. METHODS Using nationwide hospital discharge data (DRG statistics) for the years 2009-2013, we analyzed the characteristics of patients who died in the hospital after undergoing a cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis or the repair of an inguinal, femoral, umbilical, or abdominal wall hernia. We compared these data with those of patients who survived and studied the impact of the coded comorbidities on the risk of death. RESULTS In Germany, in the years 2009-2013, there were 2957 deaths after a total of 731 000 cholecystectomies (in-hospital mortality, 0.4%) and 1316 deaths after a total of 1 023 000 herniotomies without bowel surgery (0.13%). The patients who died were markedly older than those who did not, and they more commonly had comorbidities. Factors associated with a higher risk of death were age over 65 years, and comorbidities such as congestive heart failure, chronic pulmonary or hepatic disease, or poor nutritional status. Complications were coded much more often for the patients who died than for those who did not. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that there is potential for improvement in preoperative risk identification, complication avoidance, and the early recognition and treatment of complications, as well as in safe surgical technique. Measures to lower the mortality associated with herniotomy and cholecystectomy would lessen patients' individual risk and thereby improve patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrike Nimptsch
- Department of Structural Advancement and Quality Management in Health Care, Technische Universität Berlin
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Postoperative Use of Anti-TNF-α Agents in Patients with Crohn's Disease and Risk of Reoperation-A Nationwide Cohort Study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2016; 22:599-606. [PMID: 26650149 DOI: 10.1097/mib.0000000000000647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 80% of patients with Crohn's disease will require surgery. Surgery for Crohn's disease is not curative, and recurrence is typical. In this cohort study, based on nationwide Danish registries, we examined the association between postoperative treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNF-α) agents and reoperation. METHODS The association was examined in cohort 1 = patients not treated with anti-TNF-α agents within 6 months before operation, cohort 2 = patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents within 6 months before operation. Within both cohorts, we defined postoperative exposure to anti-TNF-α agents as at least 1 treatment within 6 months after the first operation and the reference cohorts were those not treated. Patients were followed from 6 months after operation and until 5 years. We used Cox proportional-hazards regression to compute adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS In cohort 1, 31 (1.3%) were treated with anti-TNF-α agents within 6 months after operation and compared with those not treated, the adjusted hazard ratio of reoperation among those treated with anti-TNF-α agents was 3.53 (95% confidence interval: 1.61-7.72). In cohort 2, 63 (16.3%) were treated with anti-TNF-α agents within 6 months after operation, and the corresponding adjusted hazard ratio of reoperation was 2.16 (95% confidence interval: 1.11-4.18). CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that anti-TNF-α treatment within 6 months after the first operation is not associated with a reduction in the need for subsequent operation. Uncontrolled confounding might have influenced our results, and, furthermore, future studies are warranted to clarify whether our study population is different from populations most often associated with postoperative anti-TNF-α treatment.
Collapse
|
12
|
El-Dhuwaib Y, Slavin J, Corless DJ, Begaj I, Durkin D, Deakin M. Bile duct reconstruction following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England. Surg Endosc 2016; 30:3516-25. [PMID: 26830413 PMCID: PMC4956705 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4641-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2015] [Accepted: 10/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To determine the incidence of bile duct reconstruction (BDR) following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and to identify associated risk factors. Background Major bile duct injury (BDI) requiring reconstruction is a serious complication of cholecystectomy. Methods All LC and attempted LC operations in England between April 2001 and March 2013 were identified. Patients with malignancy, a stone in bile duct or those who underwent bile duct exploration were excluded. This cohort of patients was followed for 1 year to identify those who underwent BDR as a surrogate marker for major BDI. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the need for reconstruction. Results In total, 572,223 LC and attempted LC were performed in England between April 2001 and March 2013. Five hundred (0.09 %) of these patients underwent BDR. The risk of BDR is lower in patient that do not have acute cholecystitis [odds ratio (OR) 0.48 (95 % CI 0.30–0.76)]. The regular use of on-table cholangiography (OTC) [OR 0.69 (0.54–0.88)] and high consultant caseload >80 LC/year [OR 0.56 (0.39–0.54)] reduced the risk of BDR. Patients who underwent BDR were 10 times more likely to die within a year than those who did not require further surgery (6 vs. 0.6 %). Conclusions The rate of BDR following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England is low (0.09 %). The study suggests that OTC should be used more widely and provides further evidence in support of the provision of LC services by specialised teams with an adequate caseload (>80).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y El-Dhuwaib
- The Institute for Science and Technology in Medicine, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - J Slavin
- The Institute for Science and Technology in Medicine, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.,Department of Surgery, Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Crewe, UK
| | - D J Corless
- Department of Surgery, Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Crewe, UK
| | - I Begaj
- Health Informatics Department, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - D Durkin
- Department of Surgery, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 6RG, UK
| | - M Deakin
- The Institute for Science and Technology in Medicine, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK. .,Department of Surgery, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 6RG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
|
14
|
Tiong L, Oh J. Safety and efficacy of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the morbid and super obese patients. HPB (Oxford) 2015; 17:600-4. [PMID: 25906816 PMCID: PMC4474507 DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2014] [Accepted: 02/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard treatment for symptomatic cholelithiasis, its safety and efficacy in the morbidly/super obese patients is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of an elective LC in the morbid/super obese patients. METHODS A retrospective review of the hospital electronic database and medical records was conducted searching for all elective LC from 2010 to 2013. The data collected included patient demographics and body mass index (BMI), length of hospital stay (LOS), duration of surgery (DOS), intra- and post-operative complications, bile duct injuries, performance of an intra-operative cholangiogram, the incidence of open conversion and the seniority of the operator. RESULTS A total of 799 patients (76% female) with a mean age of 46 years and BMI of 31 were included in this study. There were significant differences in the median DOS between the three BMI groups; BMI < 26 [64 min; interquartile range (IQR) 54-83]; BMI 26-40 (72 min, IQR 58-91) and BMI > 40 (82 min, IQR 63-104), P < 0.001. There were no statistically significant differences in the LOS, peri-operative complication rates, open conversions or bile duct injuries among the BMI groups. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that LC can be performed safely in the morbid/super obese patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leong Tiong
- Department of Surgery, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Jaewook Oh
- Department of Surgery, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sandblom G, Videhult P, Crona Guterstam Y, Svenner A, Sadr-Azodi O. Mortality after a cholecystectomy: a population-based study. HPB (Oxford) 2015; 17:239-43. [PMID: 25363135 PMCID: PMC4333785 DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2014] [Accepted: 09/22/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The trade-off between the benefits of surgery for gallstone disease for a large population and the risk of lethal outcome in a small minority requires knowledge of the overall mortality. METHODS Between 2007 and 2010, 47 912 cholecystectomies for gallstone disease were registered in the Swedish Register for Cholecystectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (GallRiks). By linkage to the Swedish Death Register, the 30-day mortality after surgery was determined. The age- and sex-standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was estimated by dividing the observed mortality with the expected mortality rate in the Swedish general population 2007. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was estimated by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes retrieved from the National Patient Register. RESULTS Within 30 days after surgery, 72 (0.15%) patients died. The 30-day mortality was close [SMR = 2.58; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.02-3.25] to that of the Swedish general population. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, predictors of 30-day mortality were age >70 years [odds ratio (OR) 7.04, CI: 2.23-22.26], CCI > 2 (OR 1.93, CI: 1.06-3.51), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) > 2 (OR 13.28, CI: 4.64-38.02), acute surgery (OR 10.05, CI:2.41-41.95), open surgical approach (OR 2.20, CI: 1.55-4.69) and peri-operative complications (OR 3.27, CI: 1.74-6.15). DISCUSSION Mortality after cholecystectomy is low. Co-morbidity and peri-operative complications may, however, increase mortality substantially. The increased mortality risk associated with open cholecystectomy could be explained by confounding factors influencing the decision to perform open surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Sandblom
- Division of Surgery, Institution of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska InstituteStockholm, Sweden,Correspondence, Gabriel Sandblom, Institution of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden. Tel.: +46 8 58 58 00 00. Fax: +46 8 58 58 23 40. E-mail:
| | - Per Videhult
- Department of Surgery, Västerås HospitalVästerås, Sweden
| | | | - Annika Svenner
- Division of Surgery, Institution of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska InstituteStockholm, Sweden
| | - Omid Sadr-Azodi
- Division of Surgery, Institution of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska InstituteStockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Viste A, Horn A, Øvrebø K, Christensen B, Angelsen JH, Hoem D. Bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Scand J Surg 2015; 104:233-7. [PMID: 25700851 DOI: 10.1177/1457496915570088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2014] [Accepted: 12/12/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Bile duct injuries occur rarely but are among the most dreadful complications following cholecystectomies. METHODS Prospective registration of bile duct injuries occurring in the period 1992-2013 at a tertiary referral hospital. RESULTS In total, 67 patients (47 women and 20 men) with a median age of 55 (range 14-86) years had a leak or a lesion of the bile ducts during the study period. Total incidence of postoperative bile leaks or bile duct injuries was 0.9% and for bile duct injuries separately, 0.4%. Median delay from injury to repair was 5 days (range 0-68 days). In 12 patients (18%), the injury was discovered intraoperatively. Bile leak was the major symptom in 59%, and 52% had a leak from the cystic duct or from assumed aberrant ducts in the liver bed of the gall bladder. Following the Clavien-Dindo classification, 39% and 45% were classified as IIIa and IIIb, respectively, 10% as IV, and 6% as V. In all, 31 patients had injuries to the common bile duct or hepatic ducts, and in these patients, 71% were treated with a hepaticojejunostomy. Of patients treated with a hepaticojejunostomy, 56% had an uncomplicated event, whereas 14% later on developed a stricture. Out of 36 patients with injuries to the cystic duct/aberrant ducts, 30 could be treated with stents or sphincterotomies and percutaneous drainage. CONCLUSION Half of injuries following cholecystectomies are related to the cystic duct, and most of these can be treated with endoscopic or percutaneous procedures. A considerable number of patients following hepaticojejunostomy will later on develop a stricture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Viste
- Department of Acute and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway Department of Clinical Medicine K1, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - A Horn
- Department of Acute and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - K Øvrebø
- Department of Acute and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - B Christensen
- Department of Acute and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - J-H Angelsen
- Department of Acute and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - D Hoem
- Department of Acute and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fry DE, Pine M, Pine G. Ninety-day postdischarge outcomes of inpatient elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 2014; 156:931-6. [PMID: 25239349 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2014] [Accepted: 06/20/2014] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little information is available about postdischarge adverse events after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS Inpatient and 90-day postdischarge adverse events were identified for Medicare patients discharged in 2009-2010 after undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy on day 0, 1, or 2 of hospitalization at facilities that performed 20 or more laparoscopic cholecystectomies during the study period. A predictive length of stay (LOS) linear regression model was derived and used to identify patients with prolonged LOS (prLOS) whose risk-adjusted LOS exceeded a 3σ upper limit on a moving average control chart. Rates of inpatient and 90-day fatal and nonfatal adverse events and interrelationships among different outcomes and alternative outcome measures were explored. RESULTS Of 89,639 study cases, 0.7% died during their index hospitalization, and 1.3% died within 90 days of discharge. Of live discharges, 8.0% had prLOS, and 42.1% had coded complication. In the 90 days after discharge, 9,416 (10.6%) were readmitted. Patients who were prLOS outliers were more likely to die or be readmitted than nonoutliers (P < .0001; χ(2)). CONCLUSION More than 18% of Medicare patients undergoing presumably low-risk elective inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy died, had a severe inpatient complication, or were readmitted within 90 days of discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald E Fry
- Michael Pine and Associates, Chicago, IL; Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM.
| | - Michael Pine
- Michael Pine and Associates, Chicago, IL; Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Langballe KO, Bardram L. Cholecystectomy in Danish children--a nationwide study. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49:626-30. [PMID: 24726126 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2013] [Revised: 11/20/2013] [Accepted: 12/04/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An increase in the frequency of cholecystectomy in children has been described during the last decades. Part of the reason is that more cholecystectomies in children are performed for dyskinesia of the gallbladder and not only for gallstone disease. We conducted the first nationwide study to describe outcome of cholecystectomies performed in children in Denmark by using data from the national Danish Cholecystectomy Database (DCD). METHODS In the DCD, two data sources were combined: administrative data from the National Patient Registry (NPR) and clinical data entered into the secure Web site by the surgeon immediately after the operation. In the present analysis, we have included children ≤ 15 years from the five year period January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2010. RESULTS In the study period 35,444 patients were operated with a cholecystectomy. Of these, 196 (0.5%) were ≤ 15 years. The median age was 14 years, and 82% were girls. Predisposing medical factors for gallstones (despite obesity) were found in only 5%. More than 50% were overweight, and one third were obese. Ninety-seven percent of the operations were completed laparoscopically, and the conversion rate was 0. 5%. Nearly half of the operations (45%) were performed as same day surgery, and 80% of the children stayed in hospital 0-1 day without readmission. 91% were discharged within 3 days and not readmitted. Morbidity was low, and no bile duct lesions occurred. The 30 day mortality was zero. CONCLUSION Our nationwide outcome results indicate good quality with 91% of the patients discharged within 3 days without readmission, no bile duct injuries, and no mortality. All patients except two were operated for symptomatic gallstone disease in accordance to the Danish national guidelines. We have not experienced a demand or a need to expand the indications for cholecystectomy beyond gallstone disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Oline Langballe
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Linda Bardram
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cholecystectomy for the elderly: no hesitation for otherwise healthy patients. Surg Endosc 2013; 28:171-7. [PMID: 23996332 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3144-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2013] [Accepted: 07/22/2013] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of Danish inhabitants older than 65 years is increasing, and cholecystectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed for this age group. This study aimed to analyze the role of age as an independent predictor of outcome for elderly cholecystectomy patients. METHODS Data from the Danish Cholecystectomy Database (2006-2010) were used. The outcomes of interest were conversion rate for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, outpatient rate, postoperative hospital length of stay, readmission rate, and frequency of additional procedures and death within 30 days postoperatively. RESULTS In this study, 697 patients 80 years of age or older and 4,915 patients ages 65-70 years were compared with 8,805 patients ages 50-64 years. Significantly more patients age 80 years or older underwent surgery for acute cholecystitis, and the conversion rate from laparoscopic to open surgery was significantly higher in the oldest group. The older patients had longer postoperative hospital stays, but nearly 30 % of the patients age 80 years or older were admitted for only 0-1 day and not readmitted, and nearly half of the patients were admitted for only 0-3 days without readmission. Also, the mortality rate and the number of patients who underwent additional procedures within 30 days were higher in the oldest group (6 vs 0.1 and 28 vs 15 %, respectively). A subanalysis of the patients age 80 years or older classified as American Society of Anesthesiology 1 and 2 without acute cholecystitis showed that 44 % left the hospital within 1 day and 63 % within 3 days without readmission and that the 30-day mortality rate was only 2 %. CONCLUSIONS Age is an independent predictor for worse outcome after cholecystectomy. However, among otherwise healthy patients age 80 years or older who underwent surgery before acute inflammatory complications occurred, 63 % had a fast and uncomplicated course. Thus, it seems fair to recommend elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy when repeated gallstone symptoms have occurred also for the older patient, particularly before the patient experiences acute cholecystitis.
Collapse
|
20
|
Prevention and treatment of bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 2012; 26:3003-39. [PMID: 23052493 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2511-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2012] [Accepted: 07/29/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in Europe (and the world) and has become the standard procedure for the management of symptomatic cholelithiasis or acute cholecystitis in patients without specific contraindications. Bile duct injuries (BDI) are rare but serious complications that can occur during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Prevention and management of BDI has given rise to a host of publications but very few recommendations, especially in Europe. METHODS A systematic research of the literature was performed. An international expert panel was invited to appraise the current literature and to develop evidence-based recommendations. Statements and recommendations were drafted after a consensus development conference in May 2011, followed by presentation and discussion at the annual congress of the EAES held in Torino in June 2011. Finally, full guidelines were consented and adopted by the expert panel via e-mail and web conference. RESULTS A total of 1,765 publications were identified through the systematic literature search and additional submission by panellists; 671 publications were selected as potentially relevant. Only 46 publications fulfilled minimal methodological criteria to support Clinical Practice Guidelines recommendations. Because the level of evidence was low for most of the studies, most statements or recommendations had to be based on consensus of opinion among the panel members. A total of 15 statements and recommendations were developed covering the following topics: classification of injuries, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, and management of BDI. CONCLUSIONS Because BDI is a rare event, it is difficult to generate evidence for prevention, diagnosis, or the management of BDI from clinical studies. Nevertheless, the panel has formulated recommendations. Due to the currently limited evidence, a European registry should be considered to collect and analyze more valid data on BDI upon which recommendations can be based.
Collapse
|