Effect of Maalox and omeprazole on the bioavailability of trovafloxacin

Association Between Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Urinary Tract Infection in Adults: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

To study the association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and the risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL).

Patients and Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted between October 2018 and September 2019. Adults with ESBL-UTIs were compared to adults with UTIs caused by gram-negative bacteria (GNB) and those with UTIs caused by miscellaneous organisms. The association between ESBL infection and PPI use was assessed.

Results

A total of 117 of 277 ESBL cases, 229 of 679 non-ESBL GNB controls, and 57 of 144 non-ESBL miscellaneous controls were exposed to PPIs within 3 months prior to admission. The univariate analysis indicated unadjusted odds ratio for PPI exposure with ESBL infection versus the GNB controls was 1.43 (95% CI 1.07-1.90, P = 0.015) while the odds ratio for PPI exposure with ESBL infection versus miscellaneous organisms was 1.10 (95% CI 0.73-1.67, P = 0.633) indicating positive association (PPI exposure increases risk of ESBL infection). Multivariate analysis revealed a positive association between ESBL infection and PPI use versus the GNB controls with an odds ratio of 1.74 (95% CI 0.91-3.31). While Esomeprazole was positively associated with ESBL infection, particularly compared with the miscellaneous group (adjusted OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.47-3.88), Lansoprazole was inversely associated (adjusted OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.18-1.24 and adjusted OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.11-1.41 for ESBL versus GNB controls and ESBL versus miscellaneous organisms, respectively).

Conclusion

Exposure to PPIs in the preceding 3 months showed an association with increased risk of ESBL-UTI. While Esomeprazole showed a positive association, Lansoprazole had an inverse association for ESBL-UTI. Restricting the use of PPIs may be beneficial in the fight against antimicrobial resistance.

Risk factors for resistance to ciprofloxacin in community-acquired urinary tract infections due to Escherichia coli in an elderly population

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance to ciprofloxacin is rising worldwide, especially in bacteria causing urinary tract infections (UTIs). Prudent use of current antibiotic drugs is therefore necessary.

OBJECTIVES

We analysed (modifiable) risk factors for ciprofloxacin-resistant Escherichia coli.

METHODS

Urinary cultures of UTIs caused by E. coli were collected from participants in the Rotterdam Study, a prospective cohort study in an elderly population, and analysed for susceptibility to ciprofloxacin. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to investigate several possible risk factors for resistance.

RESULTS

Ciprofloxacin resistance in 1080 E. coli isolates was 10.2%. Multivariate analysis showed that higher age (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.00-1.05) and use of two (OR 5.89; 95% CI 3.45-10.03) and three or more (OR 3.38; 95% CI 1.92-5.97) prescriptions of fluoroquinolones were associated with ciprofloxacin resistance, while no association between fluoroquinolone use more than 1 year before culture and ciprofloxacin resistance could be demonstrated. Furthermore, a high intake of pork (OR 3.68; 95% CI 1.36-9.99) and chicken (OR 2.72; 95% CI 1.08-6.85) and concomitant prescription of calcium supplements (OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.20-5.22) and proton pump inhibitors (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.18-3.51) were associated with ciprofloxacin resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Ciprofloxacin resistance in community-acquired UTI was associated with a high intake of pork and chicken and with concomitant prescription of calcium supplements and proton pump inhibitors. Modification of antibiotic use in animals as well as temporarily stopping the prescription of concomitant calcium and proton pump inhibitors need further evaluation as strategies to prevent ciprofloxacin resistance.

Interaction Characteristics and Thermodynamic Behaviour of Gatifloxacin by Aluminium Hydroxide

The interaction pattern of gatifloxacin was temperature-dependent Langmuir isotherm, and the Langmuir coefficients increased as the temperature was raised. The perturbation experiment conducted on this system showed that the nature of interaction was irreversible. The enthalpy change is a positive value, indicating the existence of increased activation energy as the temperature is raised. The entropy value, 24.21 e.u. obtained in this system, indicated that the hydration shells of the ions were rather tightly bound. Intestinal permeation study also revealed the decreased bioavailability of gatifloxacin relatively to the presence of aluminium hydroxide. The strong adsorption of gatifloxacin by aluminium hydroxide is due to formation of complexes with cations of aluminium hydroxide through carboxyl and carbonyl groups of gatifloxacin.

The Effect of Omeprazole on the Bioavailability and Safety of Garenoxacin in Healthy Volunteers

The effect of coadministration of omeprazole on the bioavailability of oral garenoxacin was evaluated in an open-label study in 14 healthy subjects. Single-dose pharmacokinetics of garenoxacin were determined with and without steady-state omeprazole. Following an oral dose of garenoxacin 600 mg on day 1, serial blood samples were obtained over the next 72 hours. Omeprazole 40 mg once daily was administered from days 4 to 10. A second pharmacokinetic assessment of garenoxacin was conducted on day 8. Geometric means for the maximum observed concentration and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity were 9.6 microg/mL (18.2%) and 132.0 microg.h/mL (18.9%), respectively, for garenoxacin alone and 9.3 microg/mL (21.6%) and 140.4 microg.h/mL (22.1%), respectively, for coadministered garenoxacin and omeprazole. The 90% confidence interval for the ratio of geometric means (with/without omeprazole) for both variables was contained within 0.80 to 1.25, and the bioavailability of garenoxacin was not affected by the concomitant administration of omeprazole.

Gemifloxacin for the treatment of respiratory tract infections: in vitro susceptibility, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, and safety

Gemifloxacin is a synthetic fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent exhibiting potent activity against most gram-negative and gram-positive organisms, such as the important community-acquired respiratory pathogens Streptococcus pneumoniae (including multidrug-resistant S. pneumoniae), Haemophilus influenzae , and Moraxella catarrhalis . The agent's mechanism of action involves dual targeting of two essential bacterial enzymes: DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV. Gemifloxacin was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in April 2003 for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. The drug has an oral bioavailability of approximately 71%. Approximately 20-35% of gemifloxacin is excreted unchanged in the urine after 24 hours. The elimination half-life of gemifloxacin is 6-8 hours in patients with normal renal function, supporting once-daily dosing. The 24-hour free-drug area under the plasma concentration-time curve:minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (fAUC(0-24):MIC) associated with efficacy, based on results from in vitro and animal models of infection, is approximately 30. With a mean fAUC(0-24) of approximately 3 microg*hour/ml (35% of total AUC(0-24) of 8.4) and a median S. pneumoniae MIC for 90% of tested strains of 0.03, a fAUC(0-24):MIC ratio of 100 would be expected after standard dosing (320 mg once/day). In clinical studies involving both hospitalized and outpatient populations, gemifloxacin has been highly effective in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. Clinical success rates ranged from 93.9-95.9% in patients with community-acquired pneumonia and 96.1-97.5% in those with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. Gemifloxacin is well tolerated; the frequency of adverse events with this agent is low. Most adverse events are mild-to-moderate in severity, with diarrhea (< 4%), nausea and rash (< 3%), and headache (< 2%) most commonly reported. Drug interactions with gemifloxacin are not common, although absorption is greatly reduced when given with divalent and trivalent cation-containing compounds, such as antacids. Due to its potent activity against many common gram-positive and gram-negative respiratory pathogens, its proven clinical efficacy, and its favorable safety profile, gemifloxacin is a highly effective empiric treatment for community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections.

Effect of omeprazole on oral and intravenous RS-methadone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the rat

The effect of omeprazole on oral and intravenous (iv) RS-methadone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics was studied in awake, freely moving rats, which were divided in four groups: oral RS-methadone (3 mg/kg) was given (a) to a control group (CO(oral)) (n = 65) and (b) to an omeprazole pretreated group (OP(oral)) (n = 77), and iv RS-methadone (0.35 mg/kg) was administered (c) to a control group (CO(iv)) (n = 86) and (d) to an omeprazole pretreated group (OP(iv)) (n = 86). Omeprazole (2 mg/kg) was given iv 2 h before RS-methadone. Plasma concentrations of RS-methadone (Cp) were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography and analgesic response by tail flick for 0-180 min (oral) and 0-120 min (iv). RS-Methadone rate of absorption (mean +/- SE) was faster in OP(oral) (k(01) = 0.31 +/- 0.04 min(-1)) than in CO(oral) (k(01) = 0.05 +/- 0.007 min(-1)), consequently plasma peak concentrations (C(max)) were greater (197.41 +/- 33.70 ng/mL versus 83.54 +/- 7.97 ng/mL) and the time to reach C(max) (t(max)) was shorter (11.23 +/- 1.32 min versus 39.18 +/- 1.74 min). Mean area under the Cp-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) and hence bioavailability of oral RS-methadone were increased by omeprazole without significant changes in the elimination. Omeprazole did not affect the pharmacokinetics of iv RS-methadone. The changes of the analgesic effect of RS-methadone as a function of time were similar in all four groups. In the CO(oral) group, Cp and analgesic effect were defined by the E(max) model. The relationship between Cp and drug effect in the OP(oral) group showed a counterclockwise hysteresis (k(e0) of 0.018 +/- 0.006 min(-1)). For the iv groups (CO(iv) and OP(iv)), the Cp-analgesic effect relationship was described by an E(max) sigmoid model and omeprazole did not affect the pharmacodynamic parameters. It is concluded that omeprazole causes an increase in the bioavailability of oral RS-methadone without modifying the analgesic response but affecting the Cp-effect relationship.

Commonly used antibacterial and antifungal agents for hospitalised paediatric patients: implications for therapy with an emphasis on clinical pharmacokinetics

Due to normal growth and development, hospitalised paediatric patients with infection require unique consideration of immune function and drug disposition. Specifically, antibacterial and antifungal pharmacokinetics are influenced by volume of distribution, drug binding and elimination, which are a reflection of changing extracellular fluid volume, quantity and quality of plasma proteins, and renal and hepatic function. However, there is a paucity of data in paediatric patients addressing these issues and many empiric treatment practices are based on adult data. The penicillins and cephalosporins continue to be a mainstay of therapy because of their broad spectrum of activity, clinical efficacy and favourable tolerability profile. These antibacterials rapidly reach peak serum concentrations and readily diffuse into body tissues. Good penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has made the third-generation cephalosporins the agents of choice for the treatment of bacterial meningitis. These drugs are excreted primarily by the kidney. The carbapenems are broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibacterials which can potentially replace combination regimens. Vancomycin is a glycopeptide antibacterial with gram-positive activity useful for the treatment of resistant infections, or for those patients allergic to penicillins and cephalosporins. Volume of distribution is affected by age, gender, and bodyweight. It diffuses well across serous membranes and inflamed meninges. Vancomycin is excreted by the kidneys and is not removed by dialysis. The aminoglycosides continue to serve a useful role in the treatment of gram-negative, enterococcal and mycobacterial infections. Their volume of distribution approximates extracellular space. These drugs are also excreted renally and are removed by haemodialysis. Passage across the blood-brain barrier is poor, even in the face of meningeal inflammation. Low pH found in abscess conditions impairs function. Toxicity needs to be considered. Macrolide antibacterials are frequently used in the treatment of respiratory infections. Parenteral erythromycin can cause phlebitis, which limits its use. Parenteral azithromycin is better tolerated but paediatric pharmacokinetic data are lacking. Clindamycin is frequently used when anaerobic infections are suspected. Good oral absorption makes it a good choice for step-down therapy in intra-abdominal and skeletal infections. The use of quinolones in paediatrics has been restricted and most information available is in cystic fibrosis patients. High oral bioavailability is also important for step-down therapy. Amphotericin B has been the cornerstone of antifungal treatment in hospitalised patients. Its metabolism is poorly understood. The half-life increases with time and can be as long as 15 days after prolonged therapy. Oral absorption is poor. The azole antifungals are being used increasingly. Fluconazole is well tolerated, with high bioavailability and good penetration into the CSF. Itraconazole has greater activity against aspergillus, blastomycosis, histoplasmosis and sporotrichosis, although it's pharmacological and toxicity profiles are not as favourable.

Fluoroquinolone adverse effects and drug interactions

Extensive pharmacologic and clinical development of quinolone antimicrobial agents has resulted in improved antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic features, toxicity, and drug-drug interaction profiles. Nalidixic acid and other early quinolones had limited use due to poor pharmacokinetics, relatively narrow antimicrobial spectrum of activity, and frequent adverse effects. Beginning with the development of fluoroquinolones, such as norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin, in the 1980s, the agents assumed a greatly expanded clinical role because of their broad antimicrobial spectrum of action, improved pharmacokinetic properties, and more acceptable safety profile. Although the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of the drugs have improved significantly, a major area of continued emphasis is to further reduce the frequency and severity of adverse events and drug-drug interactions. Older agents such as ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin are still extensively prescribed, but the focus of this article is on the newer fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin and other drugs that have been approved or have been under investigation since approximately 1997).

Evaluation of the influence of antacids and H2 antagonists on the absorption of moxifloxacin after oral administration of a 400mg dose to healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of concomitant administration of the antacid Maalox 70 or the histamine H2 receptor antagonist ranitidine on the bioavailability of moxifloxacin.

DESIGN

These were nonblinded, randomised, crossover studies performed in healthy volunteers.

PARTICIPANTS

24 healthy males aged 22 to 39 years (study 1; n = 12) and 24 to 43 years (study 2; n = 12) were included in these studies.

METHODS

In study 1, 12 participants received ranitidine 150mg twice daily during a 3-day pretreatment phase and 1 tablet of ranitidine together with a single 400mg dose of moxifloxacin on the profile day. In study 2, 12 participants received a single 400mg dose of moxifloxacin alone (treatment A), simultaneously with Maalox 70 10ml (treatment B), or with Maalox 70 10ml given 4 hours before (treatment C) or 2 hours after (treatment D) the fluoroquinolone. In treatments B, C and D, administration of the antacid (10ml, 1 hour after each meal) was continued for 2 days. Plasma and urine samples were obtained for determination of the pharmacokinetic parameters of moxifloxacin.

RESULTS

Coadministration of moxifloxacin with ranitidine showed lack of interaction for area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinfinity) [35.5 versus 34.3 mg/L x h with versus without ranitidine; relative bioavailability 103%, 90% confidence interval (CI) 97.7 to 109.3%] and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) [2.98 versus 2.76 mg/L with versus without ranitidine; ratio 107.9%, 90% CI 90.5 to 128.6%]. When moxifloxacin was given simultaneously with Maalox 70, AUCinfinity ( 14.7 mg/L x h) and Cmax (1.00 mg/L) were reduced by approximately 60%. When the antacid was given 4 hours before or 2 hours after the fluoroquinolone, AUCinfinity values (28.0 and 26.7 versus 34.3 mg/L x h) were moderately reduced (by <27%), terminal elimination half-life values declined by approximately 24% (9.4 and 9.3 versus 12.3 hours) compared with moxifloxacin alone and Cmax values were almost unchanged (2.55 and 2.38 versus 2.57 mg/L). The mean bioavailabilities corrected for the elimination rate constants (lambdaz) were 101% (antacid given 4 hours before moxifloxacin) and 98% (antacid given 2 hours after moxifloxacin), indicating that Maalox 70 may interfere with the gastrointestinal recirculation of moxifloxacin.

CONCLUSIONS

The bioavailability of moxifloxacin is not affected by concurrent administration of ranitidine. Absorption of moxifloxacin is impaired by concomitant administration of aluminium- and magnesium-containing antacids and administration of these agents should be staggered. An interval of 2 hours before or 4 hours after taking the antacid ensures that the effect of the interaction is not clinically relevant.

Comparative in vitro activity and pharmacodynamics of five fluoroquinolones against clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare in vitro activity and pharmacodynamics of five fluoroquinolones against clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

DESIGN

In vitro analysis.

SETTING

University research laboratory.

INTERVENTION

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for penicillin and five fluoroquinolones by E test for 201 S. pneumoniae isolates. Serum concentration-time profiles were simulated for the following regimens: ciprofloxacin 750 mg orally every 12 hours and 400 mg intravenously every 8 hours; levofloxacin 500 mg orally and intravenously every 24 hours; trovafloxacin 200 mg orally and intravenously every 24 hours; gatifloxacin 400 mg orally and intravenously every 24 hours; and clinafloxacin 200 mg orally and intravenously every 12 hours.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Free 24-hour areas under the serum concentration-time curves (AUC0-24) were calculated using the trapezoidal rule, and the average AUC0-24:MIC ratio was calculated for each regimen. Differences in ratios among agents were determined by analysis of variance (Scheffe post hoc test, p < 0.05). For intravenous dosing, the average AUC0-24:MIC for gatifloxacin, clinafloxacin, trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin was 146, 142, 122, 71, and 61, respectively. For both oral and intravenous regimens, gatifloxacin and clinafloxacin ratios were significantly greater than those for trovafloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin (p < or = 0.007). Ratios for trovafloxacin were significantly greater than those for levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin (p < 0.0001), and levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin ratios were not significantly different from each other.

CONCLUSION

Gatifloxacin and clinafloxacin achieve significantly higher AUC0-24:MIC ratios for S. pneumoniae than trovafloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. Large comparative studies are necessary to determine the clinical significance of these findings.

Pharmacokinetics of gatifloxacin and interaction with an antacid containing aluminum and magnesium

The pharmacokinetics of gatifloxacin (400 mg orally) and the influence of the antacid aluminum magnesium hydroxide (20 ml of Maalox 70) on the bioavailability of gatifloxacin in 24 healthy volunteers were assessed. In an open, randomized, six-period crossover study, the volunteers received either gatifloxacin alone (treatments A and D); aluminum magnesium hydroxide concomitant with gatifloxacin (treatment C); or aluminum magnesium hydroxide 2 h before (treatment B), 2 h after (treatment E), or 4 h after gatifloxacin administration (treatment F). Gatifloxacin concentrations were measured by a validated bioassay and high-performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetics of a single 400-mg dose of gatifloxacin alone were characterized as follows (mean +/- standard deviation): peak concentration (Cmax), 3.8 +/- 0. 5 (treatment A) and 3.4 +/- 0.9 (treatment D) microgram/ml; time to Cmax, 1.4 +/- 0.8 (treatment A) and 1.7 +/- 0.7 (treatment D) h; area under the curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity), 33. 5 +/- 5.9 (treatment A) and 31.4 +/- 3.4 (treatment D) microgram. h/ml; urine recovery, (83 +/- 6)% (treatment A) and (84 +/- 8)% (treatment D). Comparison of the results obtained by bioassay showed a good correlation. Aluminum magnesium hydroxide administration 2 h before (treatment B) or concomitant with (treatment C) gatifloxacin decreased the Cmax by 45% (2.1 +/- 1.2 microgram/ml) or even 68% (1.2 +/- 0.4 microgram/ml) highly significantly (P < 0.01). AUC0-infinity was significantly reduced from 33.5 +/- 5.9 to 19.4 +/- 6.9 microgram. h/ml (by 42%) or even to 11.9 +/- 3.3 microgram. h/ml (by 64%) (P < 0. 01). If aluminum magnesium hydroxide was given 2 h after gatifloxacin (treatment E), there was no significant reduction of concentration in serum but AUC0-infinity was significantly reduced from 31.4 +/- 3.4 to 25.9 +/- 5.3 microgram. h/ml (18%) (P < 0.01). Aluminum magnesium hydroxide given 4 h after gatifloxacin (treatment F) showed no influence on the gatifloxacin pharmacokinetics. Therefore, the optimal time between gatifloxacin application and the intake of an aluminum-containing antacid should be 4 h.

The new fluoroquinolones: A critical review

OBJECTIVE

This paper reviews the literature available on the new fluoroquinolones - clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin - to compare these agents with each other and contrast them with ciprofloxacin, an older fluoroquinolone.

DATA SELECTION

Published papers used were obtained by searching MEDLINE for articles published between 1994 and 1998, inclusive. References of published papers were also obtained and reviewed. Abstracts from scientific proceedings were reviewed.

DATA EXTRACTION

Due to the limited data available on several of the agents, criteria for study inclusion in the in vitro, pharmacokinetics and in vivo sections were not restrictive.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The new fluoroquinolones offer excellent Gram-negative bacillary activity and improved Gram-positive activity (eg, against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus) over ciprofloxacin. Clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin display improved activity against anaerobes (eg, Bacteriodes fragilis). All of the new fluoroquinolones have a longer serum half-life than ciprofloxacin (allowing for once daily dosing), and several are eliminated predominantly by nonrenal means. No clinical trials are available comparing the new fluoroquinolones with each other. Clinical trials comparing the new fluoroquinolones with standard therapy have demonstrated good efficacy in a variety of infections. Their adverse effect profile is similar to that of ciprofloxacin. Clinafloxacin and sparfloxacin cause a high incidence of phototoxicity (1.5% to 14% and 2% to 11.7%, respectively), grepafloxacin causes a high incidence of taste perversion (9% to 17%) and trovafloxacin causes a high incidence of dizziness (11%). They all interact with metal ion-containing drugs (eg, antacids), and clinafloxacin and grepafloxacin interact with theophylline. The new fluoroquinolones are expensive; however, their use may result in savings in situations where, because of their potent and broad spectrum of activity, they can be used orally in place of intravenous antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

The new fluoroquinolones offer advantages over ciprofloxacin in terms of improved in vitro activity and pharmacokinetics. Whether these advantages translate into improved clinical outcomes is presently unknown. The new fluoroquinolones have the potential to emerge as important therapeutic agents in the treatment of respiratory tract and genitourinary tract infections.

Trovafloxacin: a new fluoroquinolone

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety of trovafloxacin.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (January 1966-April 1998) was conducted for relevant literature using the terms CP-99,219, CP-116,519, trovafloxacin, and alatrofloxacin. Abstracts published by the American Society of Microbiology during 1995-1997 meetings were also reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All in vitro, animal, and human studies were reviewed for the antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of trovafloxacin.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Trovafloxacin is a new fluoroquinolone with enhanced activity against gram-positive and anaerobic microorganisms. The oral bioavailability under fasting conditions is approximately 88%. The elimination half-life of trovafloxacin is approximately 10 hours. Less than 10% of trovafloxacin is eliminated unchanged in the urine. Trovafloxacin is effective in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and nosocomial pneumonia with cure rates of > 90% and 77%, respectively. Trovafloxacin is comparable with ceftriaxone in the treatment of meningococcal meningitis in children; each produces a cure rate of approximately 90%. In treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection, both ciprofloxacin and trovafloxacin achieve an eradication rate of > or = 93%. Trovafloxacin is similar to ofloxacin in the treatment of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, with clinical success in 97% of patients with each drug. The common adverse effects of trovafloxacin include dizziness, headache, and gastrointestinal intolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

The advantages of once-daily dosing and enhanced activity of trovafloxacin against gram-positive and anaerobic organisms may expand its use over available fluoroquinolones. Further studies are needed to define its role in the treatment of various infectious diseases.

Trovafloxacin: an overview

Trovafloxacin, a new synthetic naphthyridine fluoroquinolone antibiotic, is a broad-spectrum agent available orally and intravenously. It was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of selected pulmonary, surgical, intraabdominal, gynecologic, pelvic, skin, and urinary tract infections. Its spectrum of activity includes aerobic gram-positive and gram-negative organisms as well as anaerobic pathogens. It is rapidly absorbed after oral administration, achieves good tissue and cerebrospinal fluid penetration, and has a half-life that allows once-daily dosing. It is hepatically metabolized, and dosage adjustments are necessary for patients with severe hepatic dysfunction but not for those with mild or moderate dysfunction or renal dysfunction. The drug has a favorable safety profile, and a high tendency for transient first-dose dizziness and/or lightheadedness in young women. Similar to other quinolones, trovafloxacin should not be taken with antacids that contain aluminum or magnesium, sucralfate, or ferrous sulfate. Trovafloxacin may prove beneficial as it allows for oral or intravenous monotherapy against indicated infections that normally require multidrug, broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage.

The bioavailability of nasogastric versus tablet-form oral trovafloxacin in healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

Patients in the hospital, as well as those in home care settings, often require nutritional supplementation with enteral feeding solutions. In addition, patients with serious infections who are clinically unstable often cannot maintain adequate intake by mouth and may require an alternative to oral antibiotic administration. However, delivery of crushed oral formulations of drugs via nasogastric tubes is often carried out without adequate bioavailability data, and this method of administration may not always be equivalent to oral drug delivery.

METHODS

In an open-label, randomized, four-period, four-treatment, cross-over study, 24 healthy volunteers were given one dose of each of the following treatments, with a 7-day wash-out between dosing periods: Treatment A: two 100-mg trovafloxacin tablets given orally with 240 mL water; Treatment B: two crushed 100-mg trovafloxacin tablets suspended in water and administered through a nasogastric tube into the stomach; Treatment C: two crushed 100-mg trovafloxacin tablets suspended in water and administered through a nasogastric tube into the duodenum; or Treatment D: two crushed 100-mg trovafloxacin tablets suspended in water and given through a nasogastric tube into the stomach concomitantly with an enteral feeding solution (240 mL full-strength Osmolite).

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetic analyses showed that the bioavailability of trovafloxacin after administration of crushed tablets into the stomach with or without concomitant enteral feeding was not significantly different from that of the orally administered whole tablets: the 90% confidence limits of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) for Treatment B versus Treatment A (91.3%, 109.5%) and Treatment D versus Treatment A (91.6%, 109.9%) were well within the bioequivalence criteria of 80% to 125%. Results of analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated no significant sequence, period, or treatment-by-period interaction effects. Administration of trovafloxacin into the duodenum (Treatment C) resulted in reduced systemic exposure to trovafloxacin, with a 31% decrease in AUC(0-infinity) and a 30% decrease in peak serum concentration (Cmax) compared to oral administration. Time to peak serum concentration (Tmax) was 1.7 hours after oral administration of trovafloxacin and 1.1 hours after administration directly into the stomach or duodenum through a nasogastric tube in the absence of concomitant enteral feeding. All four treatments were well tolerated; no participant discontinued the study due to adverse events and no serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

These results showed that administration of crushed trovafloxacin tablets through a nasogastric tube into the stomach, with or without concomitant enteral feeding, achieves absorption and tolerability comparable to those of orally administered trovafloxacin tablets.

Treatment of acute gynecologic infections with trovafloxacin. Trovafloxacin Surgical Group

BACKGROUND

Trovafloxacin, a broad-spectrum fourth-generation quinolone with gram-positive and gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic bacterial activity, is available in oral and intravenous formulations. The objective of this prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized study was to compare the efficacy of trovafloxacin with that of cefoxitin, an approved drug for treatment of acute gynecologic infections, together with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid as oral follow-on treatment.

METHODS

Patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute pelvic infection received either intravenous alatrofloxacin with oral trovafloxacin follow-on (trovafloxacin) or a combined regimen of cefoxitin followed by amoxicillin/clavulanic acid for a maximum of 14 days. The primary endpoint was clinical response to therapy on follow-up at day 30.

RESULTS

Clinical success rates were comparable between the trovafloxacin (n = 107) and comparative (n = 119) groups at study end (90% vs. 86%, respectively; 95% confidence interval, -4.5, 12.5). Among clinically evaluable patients, clinical success rates for infections involving Enterococcus species were higher with trovafloxacin than with the comparative regimen at the end of treatment (96% and 85%) and at study end (96% and 86%).

CONCLUSION

Intravenous alatrofloxacin followed by oral trovafloxacin for a maximum of 14 days of total therapy was efficacious in the treatment of acute pelvic infections.

Oral trovafloxacin compared with intravenous cefoxitin in the prevention of bacterial infection after elective vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy for nonmalignant disease. Trovafloxacin Surgical Group

BACKGROUND

Trovafloxacin is a new fourth-generation fluoroquinolone whose pharmacokinetics and in vitro activity suggest that it is well suited for antibiotic prophylaxis in elective hysterectomy.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, parallel groups of women 18 years of age or older received either 200 mg trovafloxacin by mouth and intravenous (i.v.) placebo or 2 g cefoxitin by i.v. infusion and placebo by mouth before elective vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy for nonmalignant disease.

RESULTS

In the 103 and 97 patients in the trovafloxacin and cefoxitin groups, respectively, who were evaluable for efficacy, the prophylactic success rates at hospital discharge (96% in both groups) and 30 +/- 6 days after hysterectomy (88% and 91% in the trovafloxacin and cefoxitin groups, respectively) were statistically equivalent. Both antibiotics were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

A single oral 200 mg dose of trovafloxacin is as effective and safe as a standard cefoxitin parenteral regimen in the prevention of primary bacterial infection after elective vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy for nonmalignant disease.

Trovafloxacin

Trovafloxacin is a fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent with a broad spectrum of activity. Trovafloxacin has similar or 2-fold lower activity than ciprofloxacin against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Against Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis, trovafloxacin has similar activity to ciprofloxacin. Other susceptible Gram-negative pathogens include Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and mycoplasmas. The drug is active against Gram-positive bacteria and consistently displayed greater activity (2- to 8-fold) than ciprofloxacin against all staphylococci and streptococci tested; activity included methicillin-resistant staphylococci and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Trovafloxacin has some activity against vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Anaerobes such as Bacteroides and Clostridium spp. are also susceptible to trovafloxacin. Preliminary clinical data suggest that trovafloxacin is effective in the treatment of patients with upper and lower respiratory tract and uncomplicated urinary tract infections and infections caused by C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoeae. The most frequently noted adverse event with trovafloxacin is dizziness which is reported in 11% of patients versus 3% of those receiving comparator agents. Other commonly reported events (> 1% of patients) are nausea, headache, vomiting, vaginitis and diarrhoea.