A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Safety and Efficacy Study of Ridinilazole Versus Vancomycin for Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection: Clinical Outcomes With Microbiome and Metabolome Correlates of Response

BACKGROUND

Exposure to antibiotics predisposes to dysbiosis and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) that can be severe, recurrent (rCDI), and life-threatening. Nonselective drugs that treat CDI and perpetuate dysbiosis are associated with rCDI, in part due to loss of microbiome-derived secondary bile acid (SBA) production. Ridinilazole is a highly selective drug designed to treat CDI and prevent rCDI.

METHODS

In this phase 3 superiority trial, adults with CDI, confirmed with a stool toxin test, were randomized to receive 10 days of ridinilazole (200 mg twice daily) or vancomycin (125 mg 4 times daily). The primary endpoint was sustained clinical response (SCR), defined as clinical response and no rCDI through 30 days after end of treatment. Secondary endpoints included rCDI and change in relative abundance of SBAs.

RESULTS

Ridinilazole and vancomycin achieved an SCR rate of 73% versus 70.7%, respectively, a treatment difference of 2.2% (95% CI: -4.2%, 8.6%). Ridinilazole resulted in a 53% reduction in recurrence compared with vancomycin (8.1% vs 17.3%; 95% CI: -14.1%, -4.5%; P = .0002). Subgroup analyses revealed consistent ridinilazole benefit for reduction in rCDI across subgroups. Ridinilazole preserved microbiota diversity, increased SBAs, and did not increase the resistome. Conversely, vancomycin worsened CDI-associated dysbiosis, decreased SBAs, increased Proteobacteria abundance (∼3.5-fold), and increased the resistome.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ridinilazole did not meet superiority in SCR, ridinilazole greatly reduced rCDI and preserved microbiome diversity and SBAs compared with vancomycin. These findings suggest that treatment of CDI with ridinilazole results in an earlier recovery of gut microbiome health. Clinical Trials Registration.Ri-CoDIFy 1 and 2: NCT03595553 and NCT03595566.

Genetic determinants of resistance to antimicrobial therapeutics are rare in publicly available Clostridioides difficile genome sequences

OBJECTIVES

To determine the frequencies and clonal distributions of putative genetic determinants of resistance to antimicrobials applied for treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), as documented in the genomic record.

METHODS

We scanned 26 557 C. difficile genome sequences publicly available from the EnteroBase platform for plasmids, point mutations and gene truncations previously reported to reduce susceptibility to vancomycin, fidaxomicin or metronidazole, respectively. We measured the antimicrobial susceptibility of 143 selected C. difficile isolates.

RESULTS

The frequency of mutations causing reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and metronidazole, respectively, increased strongly after 2000, peaking at up to 52% of all sequenced C. difficile genomes. However, both mutations declined sharply more recently, reflecting major changes in CDI epidemiology. We detected mutations associated with fidaxomicin resistance in several major genotypes, but found no evidence of international spread of resistant clones. The pCD-METRO plasmid, conferring metronidazole resistance, was detected in a single previously unreported C. difficile isolate, recovered from a hospital patient in Germany in 2008. The pX18-498 plasmid, putatively associated with decreased vancomycin susceptibility, was confined to related, recent isolates from the USA. Phenotype measurements confirmed that most of those genetic features were useful predictors of antibiotic susceptibility, even though ranges of MICs typically overlapped among isolates with and without specific mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Genomic data suggested that resistance to therapeutic antimicrobial drugs is rare in C. difficile. Public antimicrobial resistance marker databases were not equipped to detect most of the genetic determinants relevant to antibiotic therapy of CDI.

In Vitro Activity of Dalbavancin and Fourteen Other Antimicrobial Agents Against Toxigenic Clostridioides Difficile Clinical Isolates in a Greek Tertiary-Care Hospital

OBJECTIVE

Clostridioides difficile is a major cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea worldwide. For years, metronidazole and vancomycin were considered the standard treatment for C. difficile infection (CDI). However, they are increasingly being associated with treatment failure and recurrence. In this study we investigated the in vitro activity of dalbavancin and fourteen other antimicrobials against 155 toxigenic C. difficile isolates originating from patients with C. difficile-associated diarrhea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated by the MIC Test Strip and the results were interpreted using both the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints.

RESULTS

C. difficile isolates were fully susceptible to metronidazole, vancomycin, amoxicillin/ clavulanate, piperacillin/tazobactam, and tigecycline. All isolates were dalbavancin susceptible by the CLSI breakpoint (≤ 0.25 μg/ml) compared with 97.4% susceptibility by the EUCAST breakpoint (≤ 0.125 μg/ml). Dalbavancin demonstrated significantly lower MIC50 and MIC90 values compared to vancomycin (0.047 vs. 0.38 and 0.125 vs. 0.5, respectively, p < 0.001). Resistance rates to penicillin, ampicilin, cefoxitin, imipenem, meropenem, clindamycin, moxifloxacin, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline were 20%, 14.2% , 100%, 75.5%, 0.6%, 51%, 36.1%, 3.2%, and 14.8%, respectively. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotypes were detected among 41.3% of the isolates.

CONCLUSION

Dalbavancin exhibited potent activity against the isolates tested. As C. difficile is an important healthcare-associated pathogen, continued surveillance is required to monitor for development of resistance.

Fecal Pharmacokinetics and Gut Microbiome Effects of Oral Omadacycline Versus Vancomycin in Healthy Volunteers

BACKGROUND

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a common healthcare-associated infection with limited treatment options. Omadacycline, an aminomethylcycline tetracycline, has potent in vitro activity against C difficile and a low propensity to cause CDI in clinical trials. We aimed to assess fecal pharmacokinetics and gut microbiome effects of oral omadacycline compared to oral vancomycin in healthy adults.

METHODS

This was a phase 1, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial conducted in healthy volunteers aged 18-40 years. Subjects received a 10-day course of omadacycline or vancomycin. Stool samples were collected at baseline, daily during therapy, and at follow-up visits. Omadacycline and vancomycin stool concentrations were assessed, and microbiome changes were compared.

RESULTS

Sixteen healthy volunteers with a mean age of 26 (standard deviation [SD], 5) years were enrolled; 62.5% were male, and participants' mean body mass index was 23.5 (SD, 4.0) kg/m2. Omadacycline was well tolerated with no safety signal differences between the 2 antibiotics. A rapid initial increase in fecal concentrations of omadacycline was observed compared to vancomycin, with maximum concentrations achieved within 48 hours. A significant difference in alpha diversity was observed following therapy in both the omadacycline and vancomycin groups (P < .05). Bacterial abundance and beta diversity analysis showed differing microbiome changes in subjects who received omadacycline versus vancomycin.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects given omadacycline had high fecal concentrations with a distinct microbiome profile compared to vancomycin.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT06030219.

Antibiotic Resistances of Clostridioides difficile

The rapid evolution of antibiotic resistance in Clostridioides difficile and the consequent effects on prevention and treatment of C. difficile infections (CDIs) are a matter of concern for public health. Antibiotic resistance plays an important role in driving C. difficile epidemiology. Emergence of new types is often associated with the emergence of new resistances, and most of the epidemic C. difficile clinical isolates is currently resistant to multiple antibiotics. In particular, it is to worth to note the recent identification of strains with reduced susceptibility to the first-line antibiotics for CDI treatment and/or for relapsing infections. Antibiotic resistance in C. difficile has a multifactorial nature. Acquisition of genetic elements and alterations of the antibiotic target sites, as well as other factors, such as variations in the metabolic pathways or biofilm production, contribute to the survival of this pathogen in the presence of antibiotics. Different transfer mechanisms facilitate the spread of mobile elements among C. difficile strains and between C. difficile and other species. Furthermore, data indicate that both genetic elements and alterations in the antibiotic targets can be maintained in C. difficile regardless of the burden imposed on fitness, and therefore resistances may persist in C. difficile population in absence of antibiotic selective pressure.

Insights into the Evolving Epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile Infection and Treatment: A Global Perspective

Clostridioides difficile remains an important public health threat, globally. Since the emergence of the hypervirulent strain, ribotype 027, new strains have been reported to cause C. difficile infection (CDI) with poor health outcomes, including ribotypes 014/020, 017, 056, 106, and 078/126. These strains differ in their geographic distribution, genetic makeup, virulence factors, and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, which can affect their ability to cause disease and respond to treatment. As such, understanding C. difficile epidemiology is increasingly important to allow for effective prevention measures. Despite the heightened epidemiological surveillance of C. difficile over the past two decades, it remains challenging to accurately estimate the burden and international epidemiological trends given the lack of concerted global effort for surveillance, especially in low- and middle-income countries. This review summarizes the changing epidemiology of C. difficile based on available data within the last decade, highlights the pertinent ribotypes from a global perspective, and discusses evolving treatments for CDI.

Clostridioides difficile resistance to antibiotics, including post-COVID-19 data

INTRODUCTION

Updating data on Clostridioides difficile antibiotic resistance is important for treatment improvement of C. difficile infections (CDIs).

AREAS COVERED

Results from 20 countries were included. The mean resistance to 2 mg/l vancomycin, 2 mg/l metronidazole, 4 mg/l moxifloxacin, and 4 mg/l clindamycin was 4.7% (0 to ≥ 26% in two studies), 2.6% (0 to ≥ 40% in 3 studies), 34.9% (6.6->80%), and 61.0% (30->90%), respectively. Resistance to erythromycin (>60-88%), rifampin (>23-55.0%), imipenem (0.6 to > 78% in a clone), tigecycline (0-<5.0%), and fidaxomicin (0-2%) was also found. Resistance to ≥ 5 antibiotics of different classes was reported in some countries. High resistance and multidrug resistance were observed in hypervirulent and epidemic strains. Although only 1% of COVID-19 patients had CDIs, the proportion might be underestimated.

EXPERT OPINION

C. difficile antimicrobial susceptibility varied by country/region, study period, and circulating ribotypes. For CDI treatment, fidaxomicin (preferably) or vancomycin is recommended, while metronidazole is suitable for mild infections. New approaches, including biotherapeutics (Rebyota), strains, antibiotics (ridinilazole and ibezapolstat), and monoclonal antibodies/cocktails merit further evaluation. Because of the resistance rate variations, C. difficile antibiotic susceptibility should be regularly monitored. Post-COVID-19 resistance should be separately presented. Some discrepancies between vancomycin and metronidazole results need to be clarified.

Reference Susceptibility Testing and Genomic Surveillance of Clostridioides difficile, United States, 2012-17

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is not routinely performed for Clostridioides difficile and data evaluating minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) are limited. We performed AST and whole genome sequencing (WGS) for 593 C. difficile isolates collected between 2012 and 2017 through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Emerging Infections Program.

METHODS

MICs to 6 antimicrobial agents (ceftriaxone, clindamycin, meropenem, metronidazole, moxifloxacin, and vancomycin) were determined using the reference agar dilution method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Whole genome sequencing was performed on all isolates to detect the presence of genes or mutations previously associated with resistance.

RESULTS

Among all isolates, 98.5% displayed a vancomycin MIC ≤2 μg/mL and 97.3% displayed a metronidazole MIC ≤2 μg/mL. Ribotype 027 (RT027) isolates displayed higher vancomycin MICs (MIC50: 2 μg/mL; MIC90: 2 μg/mL) than non-RT027 isolates (MIC50: 0.5 μg/mL; MIC90: 1 μg/mL) (P < .01). No vanA/B genes were detected. RT027 isolates also showed higher MICs to clindamycin and moxifloxacin and were more likely to harbor associated resistance genes or mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated MICs to antibiotics used for treatment of C. difficile infection were rare, and there was no increase in MICs over time. The lack of vanA/B genes or mutations consistently associated with elevated vancomycin MICs suggests there are multifactorial mechanisms of resistance. Ongoing surveillance of C. difficile using reference AST and WGS to monitor MIC trends and the presence of antibiotic resistance mechanisms is essential.

Influence of Binary Toxin Gene Detection and Decreased Susceptibility to Antibiotics among Clostridioides difficile Strains on Disease Severity: a Single-Center Study

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the fifth leading cause of death from nonmalignant gastrointestinal disease in the United States. The contribution of resistance to C. difficile-active antibiotics to the outcomes of CDI is unclear. We evaluated the antimicrobial susceptibility of C. difficile isolates in a U.S. hospital and determined associations of clinical variables and binary toxin positivity with antibiotic resistance. C. difficile spores were cultured from fecal specimens of adult patients with CDI for genotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility assay (for clindamycin [CLI], fidaxomicin [FDX], metronidazole [MTZ], moxifloxacin [MXF], tigecycline [TGC], and vancomycin [VAN]). Electronic medical records were reviewed for clinical data extraction. Ninety-seven of 130 (75%) fecal samples grew toxigenic C. difficile in culture. Most of the isolates were tcdA⁺ tcdB⁺ cdtB^- (80.4%), and 18.6% and 1% were tcdA⁺ tcdB⁺ cdtB⁺ and tcdA^-tcdB⁺ cdtB⁺, respectively. Susceptibility to VAN, MTZ, FDX, TGC, MXF, and CLI was 96%, 94%, 100%, 100%, 8%, and 79%, respectively. Six isolates, all cdtB positive and belonging to the 027 ribotype, were resistant to VAN and/or MTZ. Higher MICs were found in isolates with a mutation in the VAN-related resistance gene vanR, but not vanS. In addition, cdtB⁺ isolates exhibited higher MICs of VAN, MTZ, TGC, CLI, and MXF compared to cdtB^- strains. Patients with greater intestinal inflammation or severe disease were more likely to be infected with cdtB⁺ strains. Decreased susceptibility to antibiotics is not directly associated with either severe or recurrent CDI. However, antimicrobial susceptibility of C. difficile is decreased in strains positive for the binary toxin gene.

Diversity of Circulating Clostridioides difficile Ribotypes in Mexico and Susceptibility to Fidaxomicin, Vancomycin, and Metronidazole

In this study, we report the results of the epidemiological analysis of Clostridioides difficile ribotypes (RTs) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Most isolates were RT027, representing 73% (84/115) of isolates. No isolates with reduced susceptibility to fidaxomicin were found; however, 38 (33.04%) isolates had reduced susceptibility to metronidazole, and 7 isolates (6.1%) had reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. These findings highlight the need for continuous surveillance of C. difficile RTs and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Direct Clostridioides difficile ribotyping from stool using capillary electrophoresis

Clostridioides difficile(C. difficile) genotyping is essential for surveillance of emerging strains, transmissions, and outbreak investigations, but culture is lengthy and may not be routinely performed, which necessitates culture-independent genotyping methods. We aimed to develop a direct from stool C. difficile PCR ribotyping algorithm using capillary electrophoresis. Ribotypes were generated directly from 66.8% of stools with 33.2% requiring broth enrichment. 16S and tcdB cycle thresholds (Ct) were significantly lower (P< 0.001) in directly ribotyped stools compared to enriched stools, and Ct correlated with direct ribotyping (area under the curve: 0.97 and 0.96, respectively). Direct and isolate ribotypes were 94.7% concordant. Mixed C. difficile ribotypes were presumptively identified in 14 (7.5%) samples with 12 (6.4%) mixtures confirmed. We have developed a rapid PCR ribotyping algorithm allowing for direct C. difficile genotyping from stool using capillary electrophoresis with occasional detection of mixed C. difficile populations in stool, which is a limitation of conventional isolate genotyping.