In vitro interaction of isavuconazole and anidulafungin against azole-susceptible and azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus isolates

Reassessment of the role of combination antifungal therapy in the current era

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Given the high mortality and morbidity associated with invasive fungal diseases (IFDs), the use of combination antifungal therapies is often considered despite the dearth of data. This review aims to summarize the current state of literature of combination antifungal therapies, discussing the potential roles of newer antifungal combinations and key considerations for their clinical use.

RECENT FINDINGS

In infections other than cryptococcal meningitis or in the setting of empirical treatment for suspected azole-resistant Aspergillus infections, the utility of the combination antifungal approaches remains controversial given the paucity of well designed randomized controlled trials. Data on potential combined antifungal treatments have been primarily limited to in-vitro studies, animal models, case reports and/or observational studies. With availability of novel antifungal agents (e.g. ibrexafungerp, fosmanogepix), combination therapy to treat mould infections should be re-visited. A phase 2 clinical trial of ibrexafungerp combined with voriconazole to treat invasive pulmonary aspergillosis is on-going.

SUMMARY

There is a need to investigate the use of combination antifungal agents. This includes delineating the indication of these combined antifungal therapies and determining how to use them most appropriately in the clinical setting.

Safety and effectiveness of isavuconazole in real-life non-neutropenic patients

OBJECTIVES

Information is scarce on clinical experiences with non-neutropenic patients with invasive fungal infection (IFI) receiving isavuconazole. We aimed to report the safety and effectiveness of this drug as a first-line treatment or rescue in real life.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational multicentric study of non-neutropenic patients who received isavuconazole as an IFI treatment at 12 different university hospitals (January 2018-2022). All patients met criteria for proven, probable or possible IFI according to EORTC-MSG.

RESULTS

A total of 238 IFIs were treated with isavuconazole during the study period. Combination therapy was administered in 27.7% of cases. The primary IFI was aspergillosis (217, 91.2%). Other IFIs treated with isavuconazole were candidemia (n = 10), mucormycosis (n = 8), histoplasmosis (n = 2), cryptococcosis (n = 2), and others (n = 4). Median time of isavuconazole treatment was 29 days. Only 5.9% (n = 14) of cases developed toxicity, mainly hepatic-related (10 patients, 4.2%). Nine patients (3.8%) had treatment withdrawn. Successful clinical response at 12 weeks was documented in 50.5% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Isavuconazole is an adequate treatment for non-neutropenic patients with IFIs. Toxicity rates were low and its effectiveness was comparable to other antifungal therapies previously reported.

Isavuconazole for the Treatment of Invasive Mold Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Study on Efficacy and Safety in Real-life Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Isavuconazole has theoretical advantages over other mold-active triazoles for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis after solid organ transplantation (SOT). The available clinical experience, nevertheless, is scarce.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study including all adult SOT recipients with proven or probable invasive mold disease (IMD) that received isavuconazole for ≥24 h as first-line or salvage therapy at 10 Spanish centers between September 2017 and November 2021. The primary efficacy outcome was clinical response (complete or partial resolution of attributable symptoms and findings) by weeks 6 and 12. Safety outcomes included the rates of treatment-emergent adverse events and premature isavuconazole discontinuation.

RESULTS

We included 81 SOT recipients that received isavuconazole for a median of 58.0 days because of invasive aspergillosis (n = 71) or mucormycosis (n = 10). Isavuconazole was used as first-line (72.8%) or salvage therapy due because of previous treatment-emergent toxicity (11.1%) or refractory IMD (7.4%). Combination therapy was common (37.0%), mainly with an echinocandin or liposomal amphotericin B. Clinical response by weeks 6 and 12 was achieved in 53.1% and 54.3% of patients, respectively, and was more likely when isavuconazole was administered as first-line single-agent therapy. At least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event occurred in 17.3% of patients, and 6.2% required premature discontinuation. Daily tacrolimus dose was reduced in two-thirds of patients by a median of 50.0%, although tacrolimus levels remained stable throughout the first month of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Isavuconazole is a safe therapeutic option for IMD in SOT recipients, with efficacy comparable to other patient groups.

Antifungal Resistance and the Role of New Therapeutic Agents

Purpose of Review

Advances in health care over time have led to an evolution in the epidemiology of invasive fungal infections. There is an increasing concern for antifungal resistance and emergence of less common fungal species for which optimal therapies are not well defined. The purpose of this review is to describe mechanisms of antifungal resistance and to evaluate the modern role of new and investigational antifungals.

Recent Findings

Isavuconazole and ibrexafungerp represent the two newest antifungal agents. Evidence from in vivo and in vitro studies has been published recently to help define their place in therapy and potential roles in treating resistant fungi. Isavuconazole is a broad-spectrum triazole antifungal with evidence to support its use in invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis. Its utility in treating voriconazole-resistant Candida should be confirmed with susceptibility testing if available. Ibrexafungerp is an oral glucan synthase inhibitor with little cross-resistance among currently available antifungals, including echinocandins. It is a promising new agent for invasive candidiasis, including azole-resistant Candida species, and in combination therapy with voriconazole for aspergillosis. Multiple antifungals, some with novel mechanisms, are in development, including rezafungin, oteseconazole, olorofim, fosmanogepix, and opelconazole.

Summary

Both isavuconazole and ibrexafungerp are welcome additions to the arsenal of antifungals, and the prospect of more antifungal options in the future is encouraging. Such an array of antifungals will be important as antifungal resistance continues to expand alongside evolving medical practices. However, managing resistant fungal infections will grow in complexity as the unique role of each new agent is defined.

Augmenting Azoles with Drug Synergy to Expand the Antifungal Toolbox

Fungal infections impact the lives of at least 12 million people every year, killing over 1.5 million. Wide-spread use of fungicides and prophylactic antifungal therapy have driven resistance in many serious fungal pathogens, and there is an urgent need to expand the current antifungal arsenal. Recent research has focused on improving azoles, our most successful class of antifungals, by looking for synergistic interactions with secondary compounds. Synergists can co-operate with azoles by targeting steps in related pathways, or they may act on mechanisms related to resistance such as active efflux or on totally disparate pathways or processes. A variety of sources of potential synergists have been explored, including pre-existing antimicrobials, pharmaceuticals approved for other uses, bioactive natural compounds and phytochemicals, and novel synthetic compounds. Synergy can successfully widen the antifungal spectrum, decrease inhibitory dosages, reduce toxicity, and prevent the development of resistance. This review highlights the diversity of mechanisms that have been exploited for the purposes of azole synergy and demonstrates that synergy remains a promising approach for meeting the urgent need for novel antifungal strategies.

Echinocandins - structure, mechanism of action and use in antifungal therapy

With increasing number of immunocompromised patients as well as drug resistance in fungi, the risk of fatal fungal infections in humans increases as well. The action of echinocandins is based on the inhibition of β-(1,3)-d-glucan synthesis that builds the fungal cell wall. Caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin and rezafungin are semi-synthetic cyclic lipopeptides. Their specific chemical structure possess a potential to obtain novel derivatives with better pharmacological properties resulting in more effective treatment, especially in infections caused by Candida and Aspergillus species. In this review we summarise information about echinocandins with closer look on their chemical structure, mechanism of action, drug resistance and usage in clinical practice. We also introduce actual trends in modification of this antifungals as well as new methods of their administration, and additional use in viral and bacterial infections.

[Systemic antifungal drugs]

Invasive fungal infections have increased over the last decades and the therapeutic choices to treat them are limited. The antifungal agents currently available are useful and have optimal in vitro activity; however, their activity can be lowered due to the development of fungal resistance. The increase in primary or secondary resistance to some antifungal drugs has led to the search of alternatives such as the combination of drugs or the development of new antifungals. In this paper, the activity of the main families of antifungal drugs, polyenes, azoles, echinocandins, 5-fluorocytosine and other new antifungal drugs, are reviewed. The main resistance mechanisms developed by fungi are also described.