Activity of ceftaroline versus ceftobiprole against staphylococci and pneumococci in the UK and Ireland: analysis of BSAC surveillance data

Antibiotic Resistance to Molecules Commonly Prescribed for the Treatment of Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Positive Pathogens: What Is Relevant for the Clinician?

Antibiotic resistance in Gram-positive pathogens is a relevant concern, particularly in the hospital setting. Several antibiotics are now available to treat these drug-resistant pathogens, such as daptomycin, dalbavancin, linezolid, tedizolid, ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, and fosfomycin. However, antibiotic resistance can also affect these newer molecules. Overall, this is not a frequent phenomenon, but it is a growing concern in some settings and can compromise the effectiveness of these molecules, leaving few therapeutic options. We reviewed the available evidence about the epidemiology of antibiotic resistance to these antibiotics and the main molecular mechanisms of resistance, particularly methicillin-resistant Sthaphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. We discussed the interpretation of susceptibility tests when minimum inhibitory concentrations are not available. We focused on the risk of the emergence of resistance during treatment, particularly for daptomycin and fosfomycin, and we discussed the strategies that can be implemented to reduce this phenomenon, which can lead to clinical failure despite appropriate antibiotic treatment. The judicious use of antibiotics, epidemiological surveillance, and infection control measures is essential to preserving the efficacy of these drugs.

Antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole and comparator agents when tested against gram-positive and -negative organisms collected across China (2016-2018)

BACKGROUND

Ceftobiprole is a fifth-generation cephalosporin which has been reported to have broad antibacterial spectrum when tested against bacteria collected from other countries except China. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of ceftobiprole in comparison with other comparators against clinically significant isolates collected across from China.

RESULTS

Susceptibility testing of ceftobiprole and comparators against 1163 clinically isolated Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria was performed with broth micro dilution method following the CLSI guidelines. All 110 S. aureus were susceptible to ceftobiprole with MIC_50/90 of 1/2 mg/L for MRSA and 0.5/1 mg/L for MSSA. For Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), MIC_50/90 of ceftobiprole for MRCNS and MSCNS was 1/2 mg/L and 0.25/0.5 mg/L. Ceftobiprole demonstrated good potency against E. faecalis (MIC_50/90 of 0.5/1 mg/L) but limited activity against E. faecium (MIC_50/90 of > 32/ > 32 mg/L). Ceftobiprole demonstrated potent activity against all 39 β-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. with MIC_50/90 ≤ 0.015/ ≤ 0.015-2 mg/L and 110 of PSSP with 98.2% susceptibility. Ceftobiprole inhibited all isolates of H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis at ≤ 1 mg/L. 91.8% and 98.2% of the ESBL-negative E. coli and K. pneumoniae were susceptible to ceftobiprole, but most of the ESBL-positive or carbapenem-resistant strains were also resistant to ceftobiprole. Ceftobiprole inhibited 84.2% of carbapenem-susceptible P. aeruginosa and 94.1% of carbapenem-susceptible A. baumannii at ≤ 8 mg/L, but only 52.6% of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and 5.3% of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii.

CONCLUSION

Ceftobiprole demonstrated good in vitro activity against a broad range of clinically relevant contemporary Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial isolates.

Update on the Management of Surgical Site Infections

Surgical site infections are an increasingly important issue in nosocomial infections. The progressive increase in antibiotic resistance, the ever-increasing number of interventions and the ever-increasing complexity of patients due to their comorbidities amplify this problem. In this perspective, it is necessary to consider all the risk factors and all the current preventive and prophylactic measures which are available. At the same time, given multiresistant microorganisms, it is essential to consider all the possible current therapeutic interventions. Therefore, our review aims to evaluate all the current aspects regarding the management of surgical site infections.

Phenotypic and genotypic detection methods for antimicrobial resistance in ESKAPE pathogens (Review)

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a growing public health problem worldwide. Infections with such bacteria lead to longer hospitalization times, higher healthcare costs and greater morbidity and mortality. Thus, there is a greater need for rapid detection methods in order to limit their spread. The ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter spp.) are a series of epidemiologically-important microorganisms of great concern due to their high levels of resistance. This review aimed to update the background information on the ESKAPE pathogens as well as to provide a summary of the numerous phenotypic and molecular methods used to detect their AMR mechanisms. While they are usually linked to hospital acquired infections, AMR is also spreading in the veterinary and the environmental sectors. Yet, the epidemiological loop closes with patients which, when infected with such pathogens, often lack therapeutic options. Thus, it was aimed to give the article a One Health perspective.

Susceptibility of Ceftobiprole against Gram-positive and Gram-negative Clinical Isolates from 2019 from different European territories

BACKGROUND

Ceftobiprole is approved for use in treatment of hospital-associated and community-acquired pneumonia in 16 different European countries and is currently undergoing clinical trials in the USA.

METHODS

Isolates were collected from hospital laboratories from 16 European countries during 2019 as part of an ongoing post-marketing surveillance study. MICs were determined using EUCAST broth microdilution methodology and interpreted using 2020 EUCAST breakpoints.

RESULTS

Ceftobiprole was active (MIC, ≤2 mg/L) against 100% and 99.3% of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA isolates collected in 2019. Against S. pneumoniae, ceftobiprole was active (MIC, ≤0.5 mg/L) against 98.4% of isolates. Overall, 77.4% of Enterobacterales were susceptible though isolate numbers in certain countries were notably low. In addition, based on non-species related PK/PD breakpoints, 69.7% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to ceftobiprole. Analysis of data by geographical regions showed that susceptibility to ceftobiprole by region or country was not significantly varied though MRSA, S. pneumoniae, Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. Isolates from Italy had lower susceptibilities to ceftobiprole: 98% of MRSA, 94% of S. pneumoniae and 61% of Enterobacterales isolates were susceptible to ceftobiprole.

CONCLUSIONS

The data for ceftobiprole for isolates from 2019 are encouragingly very similar to studies performed on isolates from earlier years showing that susceptibility to ceftobiprole has not changed and importantly that resistance emergence remains low throughout Europe.

OUP accepted manuscript

Objectives

To evaluate the susceptibility to ceftobiprole of clinical bacterial isolates obtained from hospitalized patients in Europe.

Methods

A total of 20 000 non-duplicate bacterial isolates were collected in 2016–19 from patients with documented infections at medical centres located in 17 countries in Europe. Bacterial identification was confirmed and susceptibility to ceftobiprole and comparator agents was tested using the EUCAST broth microdilution methodology and interpretive criteria by a central microbiology laboratory.

Results

Of the 20 000 isolates, 10 007 (50.0%) were Gram-positive and 9993 (50.0%) were Gram-negative. The most common species was Staphylococcus aureus (35.0%), followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae (15.0%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (11.1%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (11.0%), Escherichia coli (9.7%) and Haemophilus influenzae (3.0%). Overall, 99.7% (6981/7000) of S. aureus, including 99.5% (3483/3502) of MRSA, 97.8% (2941/3007) of S. pneumoniae, 100% (605/605) of H. influenzae and 76.3% (5492/7197) of Enterobacterales isolates were susceptible to ceftobiprole. Susceptibility to ceftobiprole was higher for isolates from northern and western Europe as compared with eastern and southern Europe.

Conclusions

Ceftobiprole continues to exhibit potent and broad-spectrum activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative clinical isolates from Europe, and as expected, with a slight north-to-south and west-to-east susceptibility gradient.

Characterization and Clonal Diffusion of Ceftaroline Non-Susceptible MRSA in Two Hospitals in Central Italy

Background: Ceftaroline represents a novel fifth-generation cephalosporin to treat infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Methods: Ceftaroline susceptibility of 239 MRSA isolates was assessed by disk diffusion and a MIC test strip following both EUCAST and CLSI guidelines. Non-susceptible isolates were epidemiologically characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, spa typing, and multilocus sequence typing, and further investigated by PCR and whole genome sequencing to detect penicillin-binding protein (PBP) mutations as well as antibiotic resistance and virulence genes. Results: Fourteen isolates out of two hundred and thirty-nine (5.8%) were non-susceptible to ceftaroline (MIC > 1 mg/L), with differences between the EUCAST and CLSI interpretations. The characterized isolates belonged to seven different pulsotypes and three different clones (ST228/CC5-t041-SCCmecI, ST22/CC22-t18014-SCCmecIV, and ST22/CC22-t022-SCCmecIV), confirming a clonal diffusion of ceftaroline non-susceptible strains. Mutations in PBPs involved PBP2a for ST228-t041-SCCmecI strains and all the other PBPs for ST22-t18014-SCCmecIV and ST22-t022-SCCmecIV clones. All isolates harbored antibiotic resistance and virulence genes with a clonal distribution. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that ceftaroline non-susceptibile isolates belonged not only to ST228 strains (the most widespread clone in Italy) but also to ST22, confirming the increasing role of these clones in hospital infections.

Surveillance of ceftobiprole against Gram-positive and Gram-negative clinical isolates from 2018 from different European territories

OBJECTIVES

Ceftobiprole is approved for the treatment of hospital-acquired and community-acquired pneumonia in 17 different European countries and is currently undergoing clinical trials in the USA.

METHODS

In this study, isolates were collected from hospital laboratories from 15 European countries during 2018 as part of an ongoing post-marketing surveillance study. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) broth microdilution methodology and were interpreted using 2019 EUCAST breakpoints.

RESULTS

Ceftobiprole was active (MIC, ≤2 mg/L) against 100% and 98.9% of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) from 2018, respectively. Only six MRSA isolates (1.1%) were resistant to ceftobiprole and originated from four countries. Against Streptococcus pneumoniae, ceftobiprole was active (MIC, ≤0.5 mg/L) against 98.7% of isolates. Overall, 75.6% of Enterobacterales were susceptible, although isolate numbers in certain countries were notably low. In addition, based on non-species-related pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints, 63.2% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to ceftobiprole.

CONCLUSION

Data for ceftobiprole for isolates from 2018 are very similar to studies performed on isolates from earlier years, showing that susceptibility to ceftobiprole has remained high.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of single- and multiple-dose intravenous ceftobiprole in healthy Chinese participants

Background

Ceftobiprole is a novel β-lactam cephalosporin with activity against Gram-positive and -negative bacteria. The aim of the present study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), safety and tolerance of ceftobiprole in Chinese participants, to evaluate this dosage regimen for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in China.

Methods

The use of ceftobiprole was investigated in a single-center, open-label, single- and multiple-dose study using 12 healthy Chinese participants (6 males and 6 females). Ceftobiprole plasma and urine concentrations were analyzed using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. The PK/PD characteristics of 500 mg ceftobiprole every 8 h at 1.5-, 2-, 3-, or 4-h infusion time were analyzed by Monte Carlo simulations (MCS).

Results

The maximum plasma concentration of ceftobiprole was observed 2 h after dosage; its terminal half-life was about 3 h. Ceftobiprole was predominantly eliminated in urine, and the cumulative excretion in 24 h was >90%. There was no accumulation after multiple dosing. Both single and multiple doses were well tolerated, with no severe or serious adverse events (AEs). PK/PD analysis indicated that Staphylococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) were sensitive to ceftobiprole. About half of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) non-producing Enterobacteriaceae are sensitive to ceftobiprole, according to PK/PD results of ceftobiprole. For Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), no regimen was found to be effective against strains.

Conclusions

The PK/PD results indicated that 500 mg ceftobiprole every 8 h at 2-h infusion time is expected to achieve good microbiological efficacy in the treatment of CAP and HAP in China.